Dear tested tutor, MASSIVE SHOUTOUT AND THANKYOU! Gave my GRE today(2nd attempt) 169Q, 158V, 327 Overall Previously got 314 (148V, 166Q) As a non-native speaker, i found it really tough to do verbal section before, LITERALLY all the types of questions seemed HARD. My honest comment : You made it all better, I cannot say I became a pro, it still seems really difficult, but your take on the questions helped a LOTTTTTTTTT! THANKS AGAIN, PLEASE CONTINUE WHAT YOU'RE DOING I'll say it again, MOST UNDERRATED CHANNEL FOR GRE, guys this man needs to reach to every student possible, cause they deserve it and more IMPORTANTLY, HE DESERVES IT!
@@tommyshelby2020 hey tommy I have my gre scheduled on 15th nov. Please can you help me with some tips. I am getting around 162 in quant and 150 in verbal. I need to boost my score. How to contact you and how can we get these materials you mentioned above?
This was great. You can also use the shortcut formula WORK= no.of people performing the work x rate x time. Rate is constant so find the rate and substitute in the new equation with given work and number of people to find the time.
Thank you so much sir. I just gave my GRE Exam and got as much score as I needed. Solely relied on your videos and mock tests for preparation. The videos helped me lot. You are doing great work.
you are, hands down, the best teacher, EVER! i am not even exaggerating. huge respect. i want to say a lot of things abt how helpful your videos have been, but i think a thank you from the bottom of my heart would suffice! THANK YOU FOR EVERYTHING U DO!!!
Great pleasure to find that video during my practice for GMAT. You are the best tutor as I have ever met. By watching your videos I realized that to be a teacher that could teach in the correct way is the most Nobel job in the world. Looking forward for your new videos or even super-platform for teaching GMAT/GRE and maybe IELTS and TOEFL. Bless you God.
Hey Philip. Had a doubt in Question 3. The question specifies that they are working simultaneously and independently which infers that they can work on one parcel at a time and cannot interfere in other's work. Thinking logically, at time 0s they start labelling. The target is to label 3 parcels. Denisa completes at 10s and starts working on the next as she's faster in labeling than dhwani. So her labeling will end at 20s. By that time dhwani would completed labeling her first parcel in 12s. So the least time to complete labeling of 3 parcels should be 20s. What are your thoughts on this approach?
I agree. It's a qualitatively different task from painting walls. He should have used painting or mowing instead if he wanted to illustrate the usual work-rate method.
Hey, Philip. I took my GRE today and scored 312 (which should get me into all my target colleges). Prepared for the last 3 weeks by only watching your videos on quants and verbal. I owe this completely to you. Thank you soo much, and keep going with the great content :))
A perfect warm up before final mock test :D . Thanks Philip for your seamless efforts and amazing techniques. Alternative Way if you want to avoid fractions ;) for Q3( can be used ubiquitously) :-> Useful formula=> Work Done = Time x Efficiency LCM of 12 and 10 ------ 120 Now Dhwani takes 12 seconds , Efficiency of Dhwani = 120/12=10 Denisa takes 10 seconds , Efficiency of Denisa = 120/10=12 (which can be inferred as Denisa is taking lesser time so her working efficiency must be greater than Dhwani) Now, for 1 parcel , if they both work simultaneously , => 120/(12+10) = 120/22 For 3 parcels = (3x120)/22 = 16.36 Hope that helps ;).
The MAD technique is amazing. Got the 2nd question right thanks to it. Thank you so much for the work you put into these videos. They have been extremely helpful. Always looking forward for more of your amazing content!!
Dear tested tutor, thank you so much for your videos. Your quant and verbal videos very quite helpful, although I got only 320 (169, 151), I am happy with my results and you played a vital role in that :)
@@TheTestedTutor Again thank you, hope I get into a good university. I will make sure that more of peers come across your channel and your channel gets the recognition it deserves :)
Glad to see you return :), hope to see the remaining quant questions from you There is a short-cut in the last question, if you input y=5 and z=100, you should get 12 and the only option that satisfies the constraint is the first one.
Hey Philip, I Recently got my official GRE scores back from ETS. I got 327(170Q, 157V). I watched a lot of your videos both verbal and quant. Thanks a lot for your playlists. Although I am from engineering background, your videos helped me brush up on some quant basics. I particularly enjoyed the trap questions videos playlist. Please keep it up! Thank you once again. 😊
Hello, Vishnu, I gave my GRE few days ago. Although my quant was very good, my verbal score was embarrassing any tips? plz... I do not have much time and I am giving 2nd attempt in a month. So, plz tell how to increase my marks in verbal?
Please make video on Linear equation where the equation of y values corresponding to the x values lowest. Btw your videos really help me out in quant section, thanks a lot.
Denisa can label 2 parcels in 20 seconds. Within that twenty second time frame Dhwani can complete one parcel and have 8 seconds free time. Thus, at the end of 20 seconds you will have 3 parcels labeled. How am I misunderstanding the question?
10:45 it isn't told that working together told that working simulataneously anf independently. Therefore it should take 20 mins - at 10 min -1st by at Denis 12 th min 2nd by Dwani and at 20th min 3rd by Denis again. feel free to correct me if I am wrong.
I gave my GRE today and scored just 300, my English was really poor in there, and somehow I was able to solve almost all Math problems, but still I didn’t score as much as I thought I would
In the 2nd last question, it said they worked simultaneously and independently. So shouldn’t it take 20 seconds for them to complete? As the first lable was done in 10 sec and 2nd is done 2 sec later by the other person as they were working *simultaneously and independently*. Assuming no time wasted in between the 3rd label should have been done after 8 more sec by the person who did his first labeling in 10 sec?
in Q3: wouldn't solving 60/11 first and then multiplying by 3 yield the same result as solving 180/11... it doesnt make a difference if you convert or not at the first place before multiplying by no of parcels
Hello! Thank you for your video. I've been watching all of your Quant videos for several days preparing myself for the exam. However, I do not quite understand example 3. So Dhwani and Denisa work independently, right? As we can see, Denisa is faster. So it will take Denisa 10 seconds for the first parcel and 12 seconds for Dhwani for the second parcel. Since they work independently, Denisa will be the first to finish labeling the third parcel (20 seconds). Because if we talk about real things. I understand that at this point of 16 seconds that we'll complete some percents of their work that would add up to 100 making it the third parcel. But if we look at the parcels at this point, we cannot say that they have labelled 3 parcels in total. I hope that everything that I have written is understandable.
It's not about when they independently finish a third, it is when they combined finish that third parcel. So after 12 seconds there are like 2.2 parcels done total. In the next 4 seconds about 0.7 parcels are done (adding their rates together). So to the nearest second it takes 16 seconds. I get what you are saying but this question assumes you can fractionally label something. :)
@The Tested Tutor I couldn't understand the logic behind the steps. In Q1, don't 6 machine take total 72hrs ? Why we are multiplying machine*time then?
@@TheTestedTutor Thank you for your response. In q1, "6 identical machine take 12s to complete a job". Is 12s cumulative time taken by these 6 machines or individual time taken for a single machine?
Hey, Philip sorry that this is unrelated to the video. Just wanted to get your attention. I have been using your strategy of slow reading and fast answering for the verbal section and it does work for me. But I am not able to stop myself from re-reading to understand the sentences better. Is that okay? Coz I am in a dilemma, and my GRE is in a day. I am aiming for a 155V. I got 154V in PP2.
How can we contact you ? Is there any email or instagram handle cause we really need some advice regarding the sops n lors and right now you are the only person we trust.
Dear tested tutor,
MASSIVE SHOUTOUT AND THANKYOU!
Gave my GRE today(2nd attempt)
169Q, 158V, 327 Overall
Previously got 314 (148V, 166Q)
As a non-native speaker, i found it really tough to do verbal section before, LITERALLY all the types of questions seemed HARD.
My honest comment : You made it all better, I cannot say I became a pro, it still seems really difficult, but your take on the questions helped a LOTTTTTTTTT!
THANKS AGAIN, PLEASE CONTINUE WHAT YOU'RE DOING
I'll say it again, MOST UNDERRATED CHANNEL FOR GRE, guys this man needs to reach to every student possible, cause they deserve it and more IMPORTANTLY, HE DESERVES IT!
Thank you so much tommy and well done on your amazing improvement
Hey @tommy shelby can you please tell what resources did you use
Like share and subscribe :)
@@tommyshelby2020 hey tommy I have my gre scheduled on 15th nov. Please can you help me with some tips. I am getting around 162 in quant and 150 in verbal. I need to boost my score. How to contact you and how can we get these materials you mentioned above?
@@tommyshelby2020 please tommy can you share the dets. Would be a big big help.
IDK, how gracefully you come up with these incredible methods
Your videos never fail to show me a faster and less error prone method of solving Quant problems. I appreciate the effort you've put into these
Philip strikes again with the mind-blowing, time-saving tips !!!!!!!! THANK YOU !!!
This is phenomenal and I finally understand this concept. Thank you SO much. All your videos are ABSOLUTE GOLD :D.
So glad Dee
This was great. You can also use the shortcut formula WORK= no.of people performing the work x rate x time. Rate is constant so find the rate and substitute in the new equation with given work and number of people to find the time.
Thank you so much sir. I just gave my GRE Exam and got as much score as I needed. Solely relied on your videos and mock tests for preparation. The videos helped me lot. You are doing great work.
Thank you Aishwarya and well done! Great job
This trick of inverse proportionality is Just awesome ✨✨✨
you are, hands down, the best teacher, EVER! i am not even exaggerating. huge respect. i want to say a lot of things abt how helpful your videos have been, but i think a thank you from the bottom of my heart would suffice! THANK YOU FOR EVERYTHING U DO!!!
Eager to sit for GRE on January.
Till I follow you from last year.
Great pleasure to find that video during my practice for GMAT.
You are the best tutor as I have ever met.
By watching your videos I realized that to be a teacher that could teach in the correct way is the most Nobel job in the world.
Looking forward for your new videos or even super-platform for teaching GMAT/GRE and maybe IELTS and TOEFL.
Bless you God.
Hey Philip. Had a doubt in Question 3. The question specifies that they are working simultaneously and independently which infers that they can work on one parcel at a time and cannot interfere in other's work.
Thinking logically, at time 0s they start labelling. The target is to label 3 parcels.
Denisa completes at 10s and starts working on the next as she's faster in labeling than dhwani. So her labeling will end at 20s.
By that time dhwani would completed labeling her first parcel in 12s.
So the least time to complete labeling of 3 parcels should be 20s.
What are your thoughts on this approach?
I agree. It's a qualitatively different task from painting walls. He should have used painting or mowing instead if he wanted to illustrate the usual work-rate method.
Hey, Philip. I took my GRE today and scored 312 (which should get me into all my target colleges). Prepared for the last 3 weeks by only watching your videos on quants and verbal. I owe this completely to you. Thank you soo much, and keep going with the great content :))
Well done Anand!!
god bless you man i was struggling with these machine problems a lot, no more.
Life saving. Thanks for tutoring.
A perfect warm up before final mock test :D . Thanks Philip for your seamless efforts and amazing techniques.
Alternative Way if you want to avoid fractions ;) for Q3( can be used ubiquitously) :->
Useful formula=> Work Done = Time x Efficiency
LCM of 12 and 10 ------ 120
Now Dhwani takes 12 seconds , Efficiency of Dhwani = 120/12=10
Denisa takes 10 seconds , Efficiency of Denisa = 120/10=12
(which can be inferred as Denisa is taking lesser time so her working efficiency must be greater than Dhwani)
Now, for 1 parcel , if they both work simultaneously , => 120/(12+10) = 120/22
For 3 parcels = (3x120)/22 = 16.36
Hope that helps ;).
Thanks a lot for this lecture. Looking forward to more of your amazing time saving tricks.
I appreciate you. Thanks for everything.
Amazing method sir 👏
I got the 2nd and last question right. Informative videos; tricky concept explained in simplest way. Thank you.
Thanks Philip ! The last question was super tough.
The MAD technique is amazing. Got the 2nd question right thanks to it. Thank you so much for the work you put into these videos. They have been extremely helpful. Always looking forward for more of your amazing content!!
I think you went a bit MAD
Dear tested tutor, thank you so much for your videos. Your quant and verbal videos very quite helpful, although I got only 320 (169, 151), I am happy with my results and you played a vital role in that :)
Well done Hirmay!
@@TheTestedTutor Again thank you, hope I get into a good university. I will make sure that more of peers come across your channel and your channel gets the recognition it deserves :)
Best Tutor on GRE ❤. Love from Bangladesh .
such an incredible trick.
Glad to see you return :), hope to see the remaining quant questions from you
There is a short-cut in the last question, if you input y=5 and z=100, you should get 12 and the only option that satisfies the constraint is the first one.
Btw Your videos have been really helpful in my prep, For you doing such a munificent job we students are really grateful 🙏 Love from India 🇮🇳
Is the questions is same difficulty in India
A general formula for this: amount = no of machines x work rate x time
(or) a = nrt
This is brilliant, thank you so much!
Thank you Sir.
Keep it up, Phillip :)
Incredible one, thanks :)
Hey Philip,
I Recently got my official GRE scores back from ETS.
I got 327(170Q, 157V). I watched a lot of your videos both verbal and quant.
Thanks a lot for your playlists. Although I am from engineering background, your videos helped me brush up on some quant basics.
I particularly enjoyed the trap questions videos playlist.
Please keep it up!
Thank you once again. 😊
Well done Vishnu!!
Hello, Vishnu, I gave my GRE few days ago. Although my quant was very good, my verbal score was embarrassing any tips? plz... I do not have much time and I am giving 2nd attempt in a month. So, plz tell how to increase my marks in verbal?
Its very helpfull, thank you.
Glad to hear that Nayma!
Can you please make videos on algebra related problems?
An awesome video
Superb video tysm & really helpful, could you also share how frequent are these topics in gre??
Once per test maybe
Respects to you sir❤️
Please make video on Linear equation where the equation of y values corresponding to the x values lowest. Btw your videos really help me out in quant section, thanks a lot.
In the last question, options (A) and (B) are correct. Which one should we pick?
Denisa can label 2 parcels in 20 seconds. Within that twenty second time frame Dhwani can complete one parcel and have 8 seconds free time.
Thus, at the end of 20 seconds you will have 3 parcels labeled. How am I misunderstanding the question?
Yes I have solved the same way, even I am confused why we are finding combined rate when they are supposed to be working independently
When you do the math,Math looks so easy ❤
10:45 it isn't told that working together told that working simulataneously anf independently. Therefore it should take 20 mins - at 10 min -1st by at Denis 12 th min 2nd by Dwani and at 20th min 3rd by Denis again.
feel free to correct me if I am wrong.
I gave my GRE today and scored just 300, my English was really poor in there, and somehow I was able to solve almost all Math problems, but still I didn’t score as much as I thought I would
In the 2nd last question, it said they worked simultaneously and independently. So shouldn’t it take 20 seconds for them to complete? As the first lable was done in 10 sec and 2nd is done 2 sec later by the other person as they were working *simultaneously and independently*. Assuming no time wasted in between the 3rd label should have been done after 8 more sec by the person who did his first labeling in 10 sec?
Hi Philip,what is the difference between identical work rate and normal?
In first question there are 6 machines, are they working at same time or in sequential order . As per question I think they are sequential.
Hi, I do not get the first. I would do 6 machines:12seconds=x machines:9 seconds which means 6*9/12 according to the proportions rules?
in Q3: wouldn't solving 60/11 first and then multiplying by 3 yield the same result as solving 180/11... it doesnt make a difference if you convert or not at the first place before multiplying by no of parcels
Hello! Thank you for your video. I've been watching all of your Quant videos for several days preparing myself for the exam. However, I do not quite understand example 3. So Dhwani and Denisa work independently, right? As we can see, Denisa is faster. So it will take Denisa 10 seconds for the first parcel and 12 seconds for Dhwani for the second parcel. Since they work independently, Denisa will be the first to finish labeling the third parcel (20 seconds). Because if we talk about real things. I understand that at this point of 16 seconds that we'll complete some percents of their work that would add up to 100 making it the third parcel. But if we look at the parcels at this point, we cannot say that they have labelled 3 parcels in total. I hope that everything that I have written is understandable.
It's not about when they independently finish a third, it is when they combined finish that third parcel. So after 12 seconds there are like 2.2 parcels done total. In the next 4 seconds about 0.7 parcels are done (adding their rates together). So to the nearest second it takes 16 seconds.
I get what you are saying but this question assumes you can fractionally label something. :)
awesome
Like is a much as you do 💪
@The Tested Tutor I couldn't understand the logic behind the steps. In Q1, don't 6 machine take total 72hrs ? Why we are multiplying machine*time then?
It is 72 machines-hours, not 72 hours. This is why we must divide later
@@TheTestedTutor Thank you for your response. In q1, "6 identical machine take 12s to complete a job". Is 12s cumulative time taken by these 6 machines or individual time taken for a single machine?
@@moontahafarin9305 cumulative time
@@TheTestedTutor Thanks a bunch for your effort and time.
Hey, Philip sorry that this is unrelated to the video. Just wanted to get your attention. I have been using your strategy of slow reading and fast answering for the verbal section and it does work for me. But I am not able to stop myself from re-reading to understand the sentences better. Is that okay? Coz I am in a dilemma, and my GRE is in a day. I am aiming for a 155V. I got 154V in PP2.
All I hope is you yelled out Eureka once you pieced this method altogether
why the number of hours 5 is used as dividing number
Can you pls tell me if the gre exams in India is this much difficulty or is it more different
This much
How can we contact you ? Is there any email or instagram handle cause we really need some advice regarding the sops n lors and right now you are the only person we trust.