Edward Edinger The psyche in antiquity

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 14 чер 2021
  • Gnosticism-and-Early-Christianity-Lecture-1

КОМЕНТАРІ • 22

  • @Liyah-encyclopedia333
    @Liyah-encyclopedia333 3 місяці тому

    Thank you for uploading!

  • @gphilipvirgil355
    @gphilipvirgil355 3 роки тому +3

    Another awesome Edinger lecture!!! 🙏 Thank you

  • @frankporter6169
    @frankporter6169 3 роки тому +3

    Thank you.

  • @RebecaEigen
    @RebecaEigen 2 роки тому +1

    Thank you so much!

  • @henryfate7170
    @henryfate7170 3 роки тому +10

    Excellent upload. Thank you very much. Great 12 part lecture series given by Dr. Edinger in 1994. This, plus the original 1993 12 part series of lectures, Part One of "The Psyche In Antiquity, The Greek Philosophers" are available at the Los Angeles Jung Bookstore, along with several other Edinger lecture series. Do you have the remaining 11 parts of this series?

    • @SiriusSimon
      @SiriusSimon  3 роки тому +5

      Yes I purchased them from said bookstore and I do have the remaining lectures.

    • @stevendiaz2095
      @stevendiaz2095 Рік тому

      @@SiriusSimon where can we purchase these lectures?

    • @SiriusSimon
      @SiriusSimon  Рік тому

      @@stevendiaz2095 here. junginla.org/

    • @SiriusSimon
      @SiriusSimon  Рік тому

      @@stevendiaz2095 here. junginla.org/

  • @jbinmoeller6285
    @jbinmoeller6285 11 місяців тому +1

    Thank you for uploading this great video. How excellent it is and how thoughtful of you to share it with all of us. Is there any way I can convince you to upload any of the remaining videos in this lecture series? Perhaps this video's viewers might also like and enjoy them. I would be eternally grateful if there is any way you could find time to upload any of what looks like 11 more vids to this wonderful series of lectures. Alternatively, would you happen to know any way I could find or buy any of the remaining lectures? Thank you again!

  • @BrotherLaymanPaul
    @BrotherLaymanPaul 3 роки тому +4

    Thank you for uploading. Having difficulty through a google search finding these lectures for purchase/download though (would love to know how to)… Do you intend to upload the rest? Hope so! Thanks again . Good timing

    • @SiriusSimon
      @SiriusSimon  3 роки тому +4

      Hi
      You can purchase the lectures from the Jungian institute of Los Angeles.
      I may upload the last lecture (its a 12 part series) just because its so poignant to our current collective climate.
      junginla.org/product-category/audio-streaming/

    • @frankporter6169
      @frankporter6169 3 роки тому +5

      Yes, plus "The New God Image", my favorite "Transformation of the God Image" ( lectures on "Answer To Job", "Aion Lectures", "The New God Image", and the first in the series of the "Psyche In Antiquity", on the Greek Philosophers...all aavilable at the Los Angeles Jung Bookstore.

  • @Liyah-encyclopedia333
    @Liyah-encyclopedia333 3 місяці тому

    Edinger!

  • @Andruiu
    @Andruiu Рік тому

    I wish Jungians would understand the state of today's situation and the urgency for us as humanity to become more conscious. Hiding such valuable teachings behind a paywall is definitely not what should happen. There are dozens of valueless things out there, for free, while these critically important teachings are still kept behind closed doors.

    • @Andruiu
      @Andruiu Рік тому

      @@bellakrinkle9381 these lectures are not about what you seem to have understood. These are not theological.

  • @bellakrinkle9381
    @bellakrinkle9381 Рік тому

    What is the goal of this group? Achieving knowledge of Consciousness or achieving knowledge of one's individual Unconscious? And all that remains hidden there? Spirituality comes alive as our unconscious self becomes known.
    The only ancient history of relevance is in one's family origins, if the goal is Individualism.
    Is this early Jung? There is absolutely nothing of interest to me, here. Apologies for interrupting!

    • @TobiasC-mg4zk
      @TobiasC-mg4zk 3 місяці тому +1

      Individuation has nothing to do with individualism.
      So much of what lies beneath the appearance of our individual self is collective.

  • @paulksycki
    @paulksycki Рік тому

    That's a lot of circular rationalization to say the suffering cause by empires caused people to stupidly hope for the next one to be a good just king the "good shepherd". And Constantine seeing the solution to this and the fact that he had a hard time ruling since he just about conquered the whole known world, decided if only petty empires didn't fight each other, if only he was the triple crowned temporal ruler of the planet, then their would be no more suffering right? The war to end all wars. The Pontificus Maximus shining like a star on top of the pyramid of power. A One World Government...... This is all king worship brainwashing same as has enslaved all humanity all through our existence. The trinity is just the Capitoline Triad of Zeus, Juno, and their daughter repackaged and renamed yet again.

    • @matthewkopp2391
      @matthewkopp2391 Рік тому

      That is a very un-scholarly perspective when there is a lot of written record in regards to the Trinity. The primary written record in regards to the concept could be scene in both Philo and Origen of Alexandria who were both Neo-Pythagorean. And the story of Pythagoras is that he studied with Jews both in Egypt and Mount Carmel. The first three letter/numbers in Hebrew correspond to the Trinity as does the Pythagorean meaning of the numbers one, two and three. The Pythagoreans did not consider one and two as the first numbers, three was consider the first real number and the hidden number behind Creation.
      Syncretism of religious ideas was a very common endeavor in the Hellenized world and the practice carried over to the Romans. And the practice was dominated by Pythagoreans who also wrote mystery religions such as the Orphic mysteries. And there were many Jewish Pythagoreans such as the Essenes and Alexandrian scholars.
      There certainly were Roman Pagan influences but the origins of the syncretism is Pythagorean.
      And you can see Pythagorean references in the Gospels which include the counting of fishes and “Joseph was a carpenter” as well as many basic sayings of Jesus are nearly identical to Pythagoras.

  • @publiusovidius7386
    @publiusovidius7386 2 роки тому +7

    Unfortunately Edinger, like Jung, begin with a falsely negative view of the cultural and spiritual world of imperial Rome, based mostly on later Christian slanders and anti-pagan propaganda. It's a cartoonish view of the ancient Romans. Most Roman emperors were hard-working civically devoted administrators as were many members of the upper class. Their belief in their gods was sincere. As was their belief in the civilizing mission of the empire. Christianity prevailed not because of its mythological structure but because Early Christians formed a highly efficient secondary welfare system that supplemented that of the Roman government. Burial societies, supplementary food rations, care for widows and orphans, natural disaster relief. That's what helped them compete against the rival mystery cults (Isis, Mithras, Eleusinian Mysteries, Dionysus) which like Christianity offered a personal relationship with a deity and a promise of eternal life. The everyday Romans believed in their gods just as most people in Christendom believed in Jesus. Nothing cynical about it. The Romans had a healthier, more realistic attitude toward sexuality than the Christians. That's why they were slanderously portrayed as licentious in Christian propaganda. The epigraphic and papyrological evidence shows that Romans had the same tender and devoted feelings toward their spouses as people today. But they were realistic and divorce was easier. As far as slavery, the Christians continued to justify the enslavement of non-Christians all the way into the late nineteenth century. So to talk of the morally corrosive effects of slavery as a strike against pagan Rome is hypocrisy. Ancient philosophers argued against slavery. Those arguments were freely available to Christians and yet they chose to ignore them for two thousand years.