Hi Allie. I have an episode suggestion for your. Budgeting. I think a lot of women are the budgeters in the family and it would be nice to see an episode discussing debt, saving etc from a biblical view.
@@WithMyOwnEars of course it’s a practical skill I didn’t say otherwise but with economy an episode on this topic would be very encouraging and not all people have this practical skill.Saving, budgeting, debt etc aligned with scripture and what it says can be super encouraging. A young listener, newly weds someone with lots of debt could find an episode like this helpful.
I don’t know that Allie is a certified financial planner or has the credentials to discuss finances like that. There are Christian financial advisers you can UA-cam if you want that type of guidance.
@@noelleleader 😂 of course I know she’s not a financial planner!! Hello…she can invite a guest. It’s just a suggestion, Geeze some people take things tooooo literal. 😅 have a good day and try to smile and relax.
Marry a WISE man. My father paid for my mother to go to law school in case he died she would be able to financially support herself and their 3 kids. When he died she was able to take care of herself and her kids.
I wanted a baby and had failed IVF. It ended up being a relief. God provided a baby to adopt. As a Christian, I MUST wait on God and His perfect plan. We can't let our desires overpower God's will. He will make it right. He has the best way.🙏
My husband and I are “open womb” people lol! We are just Christians, not Catholics. We don’t believe in preventing or trying, we just love freely! We have had three children, and hope for more ◡̈ babies are blessings! One thing that is also really eye opening about this lifestyle is that you could have 20 kids or 0 kids and still be “open womb”. The whole point is surrendering your fertility, timing, and duration of growing your family to God. It has personally shown our family that God will provide for all of the needs of your children and you and your spouse. Despite being very low income for the first 5/6 years of marriage, we always had enough, and honestly more than we need. One of my husband’s fav verses: “But there are some things that you cannot be sure of. You must take a chance. If you wait for perfect weather, you will never plant your seeds. If you are afraid that every cloud will bring rain, you will never harvest your crops.” Ecclesiastes 11:4
I think if you're open to having as many kids as you can that's just great for you, you love kids, you're having a great time, you're probably young. But I don't think this belief should be placed onto others (not saying you are just speaking generally). For example I'm 41, I have 4 children, and I'm done. The thought of another pregnancy and going back to that new born phase is terrifying to me. I don't want to take the risk of having another child at my age when I already have 4 children and am really really struggling to keep my head above water as it is. God has given me the ability to choose whether or not to have more children to a certain degree, so I'm choosing not to have more.
We were too, until we weren’t 😁, my husband decided to stop at 5, I would have kept going but I totally understand his decision, he’s also older than me and we had our children when we were a bit older, but I’m glad we received these many blessings from the Lord, even when it’s challenging
Hey AllieBeth, I know you're well-known for doing "deep dives" into movements that claim Biblically sound doctrines. I'd really love to see you do one specifically on the "quiverfull" and "open womb" movements. It's very important to understand why these movements started, and the severe misconstrued intreprations of scripture within. Speaking as someone with degree in Theology & Biblical Studies. My main area of study was on legalistic abuse of scripture within the church. I took special interest in areas of families/mothers. Now, here is my soap box: These are not new movements, and have been taught to the church for decades (based off misconstrued scripture and influence of the Catholic church). I can give many specific examples. I'll note at the end of this comment. I'm a "product" of these movements, (the youngest of 9 here) I've witnessed these bad doctrines destroy mothers and children. I can list a dozen names of mothers I PERSONALLY know who abandoned their families of 7+ children (and some of them even turning from Christ altogether) due to mental, emotional, and physical health deterioration. Mothers that ended up commiting suicide, or mental hospitals/straight jackets due to severe ongoing postpartum depression. Mothers that became unable to care, nurture, educate, or even give regular eye-contact to their younger children. These mothers were good women, just depeleted beyond functioning, unable to thrive as mothers (Some of them had tyrannical, abusive, and legalistic husbands. Some had good, loving and responsive husbands. I witnessed more negative than positives. But I don't see each of those mothers/childrens lives fully, only God does. I can only go off what I witnessed, studied, and worked with in 13 years of children/teens/college age ministry) I witnessed the "parentification" of older siblings to take responsibility they were never meant to have, to "raise" their younger siblings... which caused their sibling relationship to be highly dysfunctional for the rest of their adulthood. It affected their marriages in how they operated with their spouses. I witnessing them face severe issues when they became parents themselves, due to a lack of a healthy role model, being unwanted children, or their mothers "giving up" long before they were born. That is taken directly into later life, psychologically. (Now if the mother was heavily supported by grandparents or other family, that often turned the tide significantly) I've witnessed even witnessed these mothers in later years. For some of the mothers that were in "better situations" they were still theologically unprepared for pre-menopause... I know multiple women that were totally unprepared for multiple miscarriages in their 40's. But had already built their identity around the "open womb" teachings. I have more than one example, but I remember working with a 50 yr old woman, who had 12 children. This woman had 13-17 miscarriages in the span of 5 years... this caused her body to deteriorate heavily, her mental state barely sustainable, her spiritual state a wreck. Her reproductive system literally prolapsing out of her body, chronic fatiuge, digestive disfunction, severe inflammation issues from the stress & hormone fluxes, had gained 180 lbs, ect ect. Her ignorant husband just kept telling her the Lord "would allow which baby should live, and take the others to heaven" Or, "Abraham and Sarah had a baby in their old age" I could have strangled him... total disregard for the disenergration of his wife's body, mental health, and spiritual health. (Also, a total misconstrued application of scripture). He was not fulfilling his Biblical role of ensuring his wife was flourishing. He just got s*x whenever he wanted, how he wanted.. he wasn't a bad man, he was just brainwashed by bad doctrine. Each miscarriage she had, her body was in an even worse state. When I worked with her, she could no longer carry a baby past 8 weeks. I was able to guide her through scripture for this topic, show her what was happening for her body, and a book on natural family planning. I told her what to discuss with her husband. 10 months later, she had dropped 115lbs, was in excellent health, had tons more energy for her young children and first grandchild. Her mental and spiritual state was shockingly better. All because no more miscarriages, they started family planning and let her body finish menopause. She actually began having a significantly better relationship with her husband & children too! (Note from earlier: Gen 38:9-11. The catholic church taught he was killed for "preventing life" and influenced the Chrisitan church. This createdba major root for both bad doctrines. But by context as a whole, and the Jewish cultural context, he was killed for refusing to uphold responsibilities to his dead brother via levirate marriage. It wasn't the specifically the act of "birth control" he was killed for, it was for disobeying Gods command and dishonoring Jewish custom/law. But it's easy to twist this scrupture to blame "birth control" exclusively to appear as the only offense to God. This simply is NOT true. These a ton of other examples like this, where scripture is taken out of context. We also have to note, rhe men of scripture that had 8+ children were equivalent to multi millionaires for their time. They often had more than one wife AND dozens of servants to care for the children. They could provide for, feed, and protect their numerous children. Many other men in scripture had few or even no children. Jospeh only had 2 children, was he any less favored, blessed, or loved by God for it? No. But those examples are conviently forgotten about. Proverbs is where much of these doctrines pull from, but it is a book of "wisdom & disciplines" NOT Biblical commandments. As Christ followers, we to follow commands in the Old Testament IF they are repeated by Jesus in the New Testament. Jesus does NOT say to "be fruitful and multiply" he commands to "go out and make disciplines". We see this displayed directly in the lives of his 12 Disciples, most are recorded to have only 1-3 children, some remained unmarried.) I'm not anti-big family, there are a FEW families I saw do big families well... But it seriously peeves be that both "open womb" and "quiverfull" movements imply that you are more spiritual, more faithful to God the more children you have. The implication is you'l should be "more respected" by the church, and if you have a small family you are "less than" (tell that to women with multiple miscarriages, who wanted more kids). I've watched this play out to create highly legalistic & spiritually, emotionally, and physiologically abusive scenarios within the church & famlies. Treating children as means to boost ones own ego, and treating their wives like a "breeder" slave... I'm not even exaggerating. That is unbiblical. That is no better than how pagan religions allow their wives to be treated. That is a direct representation of the Curse from the Fall of Adam and Eve.
I appreciate your comments. A lot of these pro life stances are rooted in Roman Catholic teaching. I had a friend who nuanced having my tubes tied after #6 was like a abortion. Btw I went to a natural birth control tracking the fertile/non fertile cycle with green, yellow, and red stickers. It was taught by an RC nun. Using that system I had #5.
@@Susan-f5u I appreciate you mentioning that! It's so important as Christians to realize how much we need to separate Roman Catholic influence from Christian Doctrine. As much of the Catholic influence directs us to live by "works" rather than living by the Grace Jesus Christ, and his atonement for us.
@@MJ-jw8nb Do you have any links to anything you have written on this subject? I read years ago that the RC church in Italy taught that women were not to be given pain relief during childbirth because the Lord said they would have pain and sorrow in childbirth due to Eve’s sin in disobedience. But I noticed in the NT that Jesus had compassion and healed people as not only a sign of His miraculous deity, but also the character of God’s compassion.
@@Susan-f5u I'm so sad, because I had a thoughtful and in-depth response for you!! But when I went back, the comment had disappeared! :'( Perhaps you could check your email for the notification? Since UA-cam will send email notifications and the written comment responses, it should still appear there, even if UA-cam erased it here.
I’m not sure I entirely agree about DACA. Lots of kids were brought here as young children. The US is the only home many of them have ever known. I think it’s cruel to deport automatically those in that situation. I think the system should prioritize helping those youth with their path to citizenship. A child can’t help that their parent broke the law.
Sorry but they need to realize they can't just come here with their kids or have kids and be anchored. The cycle continues. You have to no longer have the incentives.
@@jgal6620 Jesus' earliest years were then, according to the Gospel of Matthew, spent as a refugee in a foreign land, and then as a displaced person in a village a long way from his family's original home. Would it not be better then to try to understand the predicament as humans and as children especially to help better them instead of despise them?
Women generally change their mind as their brains change by the process of becoming a mother. Thankfully, getting married older, we did have that discussion and I was very open that a baby = retirement for me. Husband was fully on board.
I have DACA I came to the US at the age of 7. I don't take Allie's point personal and still choose to listen to her. So demure and mindful of me lol. I love listening to her biblical take on different topics. You're awesome for not backing down Allie!
Narrowing to property ownership?!? That’s ridiculous!!! What about all the millennials who are saving hard but are in their 30s and still can’t buy a house due to our insane economy?
Hey Allie, I’m a 59 year old preachers wife who didn’t own a house/property until 6 years ago. Surely you don’t think people like me who didn’t have the money to buy a house shouldn’t be able to vote?!! You said “property owners.” That should not be the qualification for voting.
I wholeheartedly agree! My 18 year old son and 20 year old daughter are engaged in politics and current issues but they don’t own property yet. Their vote should count because they are of age and are a legal citizen of this country with an ID to prove it.
Yes! This episode by far is one of the most simple minded things I think I’ve ever heard Allie say. I watch most of her episodes and she went too far with this one. Women and all US citizens have the right to vote!
In the past it was property owners. I believe she means to say household vote. Whether or not you own a property, I would agree that a household vote makes more sense than allowing every individual over 18 to vote.
Allie, I am utterly disappointed in your comments regarding DACA. It is evident from your comments that you know very little about the issue or have a very narrow-minded perspective on it. I am a DACA recipient, and here's my story. My mother came to the United States after my father abandoned her, my brother, and me. The home in which she was staying was abusive and toxic, so she fled with my brother, who was two years old at the time, and I was six months old. She came to the United States hoping to provide for and protect her children. Once here, she worked long days and nights without ever having to apply for food stamps or government assistance. She always told me, "I came here seeking an opportunity, not to become someone else's charity case." Growing up, I did not go to dentist appointments, doctor visits, or annual exams. We did not have health insurance, nor could we afford it. Despite all these hardships, my mother's top priority was ensuring my brother and I did well in school, had enough food and a roof over our heads. I'm 24 years old now, and have known no other home other than my hometown in Kansas City. I went to college, graduated with a Bachelor's degree in Data Analytics, and am going back to school for my Master's in the spring. My brother decided not to go to College but instead, went to Barber school, got his license, and is self-employed. I'm aware not every DACA recipient's situation is the same as mine. However, that is exactly my point. The particular example you shared does not speak to situations like mine. I also believe you showed no empathy for people like me. I had no say in the matter. I was simply brought here, but I am so grateful that I was. Allie, I'm not saying not to talk about this issue. There are a lot of problems currently with it. However, it's not as black and white as you paint it to be. And it's completely misleading of you to discuss a topic with very little knowledge to your large audience. Tell me, honestly, that you would not leave a corrupt country, an abusive household, travel across dry land and across rivers if that meant you had a chance to provide a better life for your children? If, after reading this, your opinion has not changed, then tell me honestly, where would you like me to go? Where should I call home?
I grew up in a country where my family always followed the immigration laws. I was never without a visa and alien residence permit. That country still never provided me with a pathway to citizenship. Even to obtain permanent residence there I would have to leave as an adult and come back for a job that would employ me as a non-citizen. Is it unjust of that country to not give me a way to become a citizen even though I never chose to be born there and spend all my life growing up there? Maybe, but it's how countries all around the world run things. I recognize it's the law and that order is necessary for fairness to exist. I'd like to see that country allow people like me who grew up there and always followed the immigration laws to become citizens, but I also recognize that not following the law in that area would never help my case. Some countries like the US are much more flexible and generous than others in that area, and in some ways the DACA situation is a result of the US' flexibility there and failure to uphold fair order all over again after the amnesty under Reagan. Whatever the solution, I think we do need to make sure that order exists for fairness and that laws are meant to uphold order for that reason. Bypassing or undermining the law is not the solution.
I’m glad your mom escaped that situation, and I’m glad you are a productive member of our country. However you must understand that no country can withstand the onslaught of tens of millions of people moving here illegally, especially in a short period of time. There are big incentives which drive this migration, and DACA is just one of many of these incentives. The areas in my state with high migrant populations are socially and fiscally devastated; school systems and health systems overrun, property taxes out of control, American citizens pushed out of work, etc. I work in a hospital in a town with a very large migrant population, and we struggle financially to stay open because so many of the patients we treat can’t pay. And, perhaps the most troubling, the number of American citizens who are now alcoholics or drug addicted is staggering. These people’s jobs have either been shipped overseas or shifted to migrants. You have to understand that the large corporations and billionaires are taking advantage of this situation in order to benefit from cheap labor, rather than paying people livable wages. This cycle perpetuates the wealth gap in this country.
If I’m hungry, it is still wrong to steal. My experience is my husband’s business struggling and being forced out of California because we can’t compete with the cheap labor from undocumented immigrants. Mind you they were HARD workers who did great work. But because they were paid under the table, they harm other hard working people. How did your mom work all of those years? If her employment was not through legal means, I guarantee it hurt other people. No one thinks about the other business who do things right and pay workman’s comp and payroll taxes and are constantly under bid. The issue is you feel your mom was completely justified in all of her actions and there is zero remorse. It is a messy situation because my compassionate heart wants to be generous to the children, but the kids don’t realize it’s the parents who put them in this cruel situation.
@@dv9360 DACA, in its current state, is not a pathway to citizenship. I must renew my application every two years and pay $600; I recognize I will always remain with a DACA status unless the law changes. I shared my story with Allie not to raise the question of what is fair and what isn't; my main goal was to lay out my particular situation that demonstrates this is not a black-and-white issue as she's painting it to be.
@@MFPWM2010 Trust me, I hear you. I agree with your point here. No country should simply ignore mass immigration. I recognize a country must enforce its laws to maintain a functioning society and to keep its citizens safe. My main goal in sharing my story is to bring a real-life scenario of a recipient of DACA to show that it's not as black and white as Allie states in her words here, "I don't like it. I think it's a whole horrible system that we have put in place. We're talking about 17-year-old boys. We're not talking about 3-year-old toddlers; we're talking about 17-year-old boys considered minors, and they get to come here and not get deported because of DACA. First of all, I think how it was decided and how it was implemented was completely unconstitutional, and I do not believe that any illegal alien should be allowed in the United States, I don't." (Allie Beth Stuckey 2024, time 19:24) She's wrong in saying: "they get to come here and not get deported." Someone who does not know the requirements of DACA might interpret that as saying, a 17-year-old boy from Mexico or anywhere else can come to the US, apply for DACA, and avoid deportation when that is not the case at all. Here are the requirements for DACA: a.) You must have been under the age of 31 on June 15, 2012 (which is when the program first started.) b.) You must have entered the country before your 16th birthday. c.) Must have lived continuously in the United States from June 15, 2007, up until the current present time. You have to prove your physical presence. d.) Have completed high school or a GED, have been honorably discharged from the armed forces, or are enrolled in school. e.) Have not been convicted of a felony or a serious misdemeanor and do not otherwise pose a threat to national security or public safety. The majority of us DACA recipients were brought here by our parents; the US is the only home we've ever known. I'm open to discussing why a country must have laws on immigration. That's great and all, but let's also have the difficult conversation that this affects individuals like me; individuals who have built their whole lives here. I don't appreciate that Allie dehumanizes DACA recipients. That's not Christ-like at all, if she wants to have a true discussion on her podcast, she must get informed or bring someone with background and experience on the topic.
It would be very unfair to allow those who only own property to vote. I do agree you need to be a citizen to vote and I think showing ID to vote is absolutely valid. Politics matter because policies matter because people matter
I was thinking the same thing. I live in California and am blessed to be a property owner, but there is a huge population of my church and our whole state who can’t afford to own property here, but are good citizens, paying taxes and being a benefit to society. I would love Allie to explain her position and hopefully rethink that idea.
@@mrsjennym yes, II have a problem with that. I rent. So does that mean that I shouldn't be allowed to vote? And many elderly people sell their property and no longer own property, so does that mean they shouldn't vote?
The concept of having to own property to vote is not a bad one. But, I think we need to change the concept to be only tax payers that are actual citizens. This way, those U.S. citizens that rent their homes will have a say with their vote. If a person pays into the tax system, they should have a say in how that money is being used and who will represent them. So, same concept with a modified application.
I believe just a kind of citisenship test or voter license would be good. To make sure someone understand about basics principles of the politics and the country, being of sound mind, etc, similar to a license to drive
I've cocluded a good model of devision making might be: 1. talk about a decision/ vision/ idea. 2. Pray about it together and or separately. 3. Come back together to talk. Husband decides. I fell into a philosophy I heard thru Dr. Phil "two messes, one no". I didn't recognize that was giving me tie breaker/veto power. I could shoot down anything I didn't like. That means I'm in charge as the woman.
@@jamesg3808 Paul never tells husbands to lead or have authority over their wives; he tells them to love their wives. He uses the word “love” 6 times when addressing husbands in Ephesians 5. Leadership is not mentioned, and I think we’ve poorly understood the verses that mention submission. Marg Mowzcko.
So here is my take on birth control as a 30 year old mom who has four kids five and under: during my last c section with my now 9 month old son, I got a tubal ligation done. It was something that my husband and I prayerfully considered and felt was the right choice for our family. I’ve been pregnant and breastfeeding non stop for 6 years now and my OB told me that he is concerned about potentially doing a fifth c section on me, especially because we have babies so close together. This was an emotional decision for me because I love being pregnant, I love babies, I love my children. But we’re okay with being done and I don’t think that we have sinned in our decision. So this issue is not black and white. I think choosing to limit the number of children you have is a matter of conscience in the liberty of the believer and it depends person to person.
@@Just.A.Little.Gem.exactly. It’s sinful to separate sex from the procreative aspect. That is why God made sex! You can practice abstinence during the times when you could become pregnant. That would be good for you spiritually.
Aside from it being generally imprudent to make such a permanent decision at a time of total fatigue, it is indeed sinful to directly and intentionally destroy the gift of fertility through sterilization. It doesn’t mean that every couple is required to have as many children as possible (my husband and I only have two because of health reasons), but we cannot intentionally thwart the marital act, therefore perverting (in the true meaning of the word) Gods natural law.
I really liked the portion about having doubts. I would even like an episode on this. I think we all go through this but get self concious to admit it and talk about it, and felt a real connection hearing about it from someone else. Thank you for being honest and candid and not ashamed!
I grew up in a religion called Laestadian Lutheran. They don't allow birth control or any family planning whatsoever. I'm from a family of 12kids. Families of 9-18 are the norm. Let me just say there are alot of dysfunctional families there and most people have some sort of attachment disorder. It is very difficult for a mother who is perpetually pregnant to meet the needs of the child. She may love them all the same but from my own experience, the parents can not fully take care of all the emotional and spiritual needs of the child. Many of these people are not actually choosing this lifestyle, it's being chosen for them so they are not intentional about raising their kids. My husband and I left that church a long time ago but I always laugh when people who have no experience at all of living in a family of an "open womb" think it's just fine and dandy.
@@avaglynn1 I believe it's controlling and abusive to teach it's a sin to use contraception. You give up your own free will and sometimes your health to your community.
I'm disabled so... NO you shouldn't have to own property or pay taxes. There were yrs I worked and owned a home, but don't punish me because I'm sick and live under the poverty level.
This was a good episode! I appreciate her continuing to speak out against IVF! How we treat the least of these matters to the Lord. I have yet to see someone defend IVF from the perspective of the children who are sentenced to a process in which they have a very little chance of surviving.
In that respect, how is it any different than getting pregnant naturally? Most pregnancies end in miscarriage, often before the woman even knows she is pregnant. There is a high chance of the fertilized egg not being able to successfully grow and survive, but women still knowingly try to get pregnant. What is the difference?
Simple answer: "Wives, submit to your husbands as to The Lord. For the husband is head of the wife, as Christ is head of the church...." Ephesians 5:22-23.
I appreciate your simplicity, but unfortunately it's not simple: "But God said to him, “Do not be so distressed about the boy and your slave woman. Listen to whatever Sarah tells you, because it is through Isaac that your offspring[a] will be reckoned." Genesis 21:12
@@aloe704 That passage is not addressing a saved born-again believer who is part of the church age-which if you are saved you are a part of. Many of the epistles have instruction for saved born-again believers on how to live a spirit filled life to have a victorious Christian life. You can’t just pull any verse out of any book and assume it’s addressing you today. That makes for very bad doctrine. 2 Timothy 2:16 Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth.
Happy to narrow voting rights exclusively to property owners?!? You’re wild for that one,Allie 😭🤦♀️🙃. 65%+ of military members are renters- they can die for our country but not vote 🗳️
I know she didn't elaborate, but everyone I've ever heard go in-depth on supporting limited franchise also supports service-based voting rights. The intention is to prevent people who haven't demonstrated a stake in the long-term future of the country from voting and there are a lot of dimensions we could filter on to accomplish that: property ownership, marriage and children, military service, etc.
@lukedornon7799 that seems like a huge undertaking for our society. Every person would have to fill out a questionnaire to determine their eligibility and then provide documentation or proof. Then there's obviously room for fraud. Seems like too much of a hassle in my opinion.
@@camillemitchell301 You do realize we already have systems in place to verify people's eligibility to vote, right? Something being a hassle isn't much of an argument by itself for why we shouldn't do it.
Narrowing voting to property owners is the stupidest thing I have ever heard. As the economy worsens, fewer people own homes and have to rent. This opinion is very poorly thought out, then again I am reminded that Allie used to work for Fox News
I don’t think she truly thinks that’s the answer, but clearly she knows the history of voting. And actually when only property owners did vote in the past and the proposition for women to vote was made, most women were against the idea. They wanted men to take the lead. Of course we can’t go backwards and I don’t think that is necessarily the answer nor do I really think Allie thinks that’s the answer but I bet you she knows the depth of the history behind that comment and that’s why she said it.
You mean, "What some old men, 1500 years ago, gathered into a book, excluding things that didn't support a strong central church, you believe and support." There, fixed it for you.
@@confuse3671 First of all, they were not all old men. It is a book authored by many people over many hundreds of years. Furthermore it is considered to be the Word of God. To many many people. A guiding light for many. Just because you don’t believe in God or His Son Jesus Christ doesn’t make it any less true.
You know you can own property in USA without being a citizen - hardly a qualification to vote. Also, the US supreme court has already ruled that denying the right to vote based on property ownership was a violation of the 14th Amendments equal protect clause. Asked and answered - you are wrong.
@@alex43223 What case do you think involved the Supreme Court deciding on the 3/5ths rule? There is no such case. And the 14th Amendment explicitly repealed the rule, so that's another level on which your argument does not make sense.
@@kamarwashington it does not flip flop on basic things such as whether black people count as full people or states can require literacy tests to limit who can vote
@@allyjmjm They ruled that abortion was protected under the 14th amendment and now it’s not. This is evidence that similar precedents can be set or unset involving the 14th amendment. I’m sure you can agree that this was a rather significant change. This is why they aren’t necessarily a standard for what ought to be.
"Only home owners allowed to vote" really? I think you should expand on that statement a LOT more. Please, make your reasoning behind believing this, make sense. Tia.
I'm so disappointed. I think Ally has shown some colour that I don't agree with. Her type of 'Christianity' is borderline snobery! I'm hurting saying that.
My biggest gripe with deliverance ministries, alongside what you just said, is they do not properly prepare their congregation or individuals for the snare of divination and mysticism. So often do I see people involved in them glorify the manifestations they have seen. I have seen them, myself. I don't want to tell stories about what I have seen, I want to tell the good news about how Jesus has saved me.
Can you be born again more than once? Asking for those Christians living in sin. I have had demons inside me. I have felt them. I'm a Christian. I felt the shift between me & them looking thru me. And I heard them in my thoughts.
It’s a secondary issue but I don’t think it should be outright dismissed. There’s a book by Rebecca Brown called He Came to Set the Captives Free. She helped a high ranking satanist leave satanism after 2 decades being involved in it. Although, she (ex satanist) accepted Jesus she still needed deliverance from all the demons and “protectors” which took a while. That didn’t make her any less of a real Christian.
Read your Bible 🙏🏽 Clear your mind of what you *think* deliverance means, and read the Word. Pray about it beforehand, seek the Lord. He will reveal it to you 🥰
Ok, but what rights are you referring to? Women have had the right to vote for over 100 years,, own property for over 150. Women have had the right to divorce their husbands since 1937 and as of today very sadly, there are still states where women can get a late term abortion. Women can fight in combat, women can own firearms. What conditions and from when are you talking about?
I disagree with saying it’s a submit to your husband issue. Husbands are also called to submit to their wives. If he is forcing her to stay at home, that is not love. If she is being stubborn and unwavering, that is not loving either. They need to pray about this together. And seek wise, biblical counsel if necessary.
Sorry, my bad. It doesn’t say that. But it still calls the man to love. And forcing a woman to be a stay at home mom when she doesn’t want to, is not love.
@@emilygodwin4480 Yes, the man should love his wife, and the wife should submit to him. The ideal situation is for the wife to prioritize caring for the home and the children over a job or career outside the home. If she does not want to stay at home, there is a reason for that, and she should ask herself what that reason is. Sometimes, there is economic stress where the wife may temporarily work a job to help financially, which is unfortunate but a common situation. However, if the wife wants to prioritize a long-term career because she wants to prove that she "can do anything a man can do" and "does not need a man" then her desire is coming from a place of arrogance, and she needs to change her heart.
@emilygodwin4480 Possibly, but it's not about them. It's about the kids. About what the Lord. What's best for the kids. If they are Christian, the husband would have consulted God & then decided that it is indeed better for the kids & family for her to be a sahm.... she must submit & does NOT mean he is unloving. It's actually the opposite.
Ephesians is filled with military terminology (ex. putting on the armor of God), and the command for wives to submit to their husbands is no different. As I understand it, the submissive position on the battlefield is the position holding the shields so that the dominant positions can focus on effectively using their spears. The one holding the shield is no less valuable than the one holding the spear, but rather, the two work together. The shield defends while the spear attacks.
No, Ephesians is not filled with military terminology. Yes, there is the illustration of putting on the full armor of God but there is zero military thought in instructions of wives being subject to their husbands.
Why…it is a very recent thing in the course of human history. The Bible does not say “women shall have the right to vote.” I can understand your disagreement with it, but that doesn’t make it crazy.
It actually was not crazy. The voting system back then was based on a household vote (with the man voting because he was seen as the head of the household) rather than an individual vote, which is what we are familiar with today. I highly encourage you to actually research the history of voting in the U.S. and understand why things were the way they were, rather than arrogantly assuming that everyone back then was "crazy" while you are somehow more "enlightened."
Not crazy at all. Logical. If women run the world and want to be boss over men in general, of course what follows is voting rights, equal rights, and unfortunately even wanting to transition to being male or acting like a male. None of it is Gods best for us or His original design. How we feel about it doesn’t matter actually. The world doesn’t work very well recently and that’s a fact.
I thought so too but hear me out: I believe Allie is coming from the context that if a husband and wife are married and living by the Word, they are one. This means they most likely share the same stance on who to vote for. Therefore her husband’s stance is also her stance, it’s just under his name. Historically, women have been covered by their husband, thus they were known as Mr and Mrs (last name) or sometimes even Mr and Mrs (husbands first and last name). This obviously has a bunch of context to it that we don’t live in a society anymore but I think that’s where she was coming from 🤷🏽♀️ in an ideal world where women are not devalued
I'm curious as to who watches Allie's kids while she's at work doing her show? Her husband? A nanny? Why isn't she a SAHM? She seems to want the rest of us to be.
Not all deliverance takes place as you described. There are pastors and missionaries who humbly practice deliverance. May not agree with you on all issues, but really love your podcast! ❤
I believe we are meant to submit to our heads (women to their husbands, men to their elders, ect.) unless they are leading you into sin. So basically submit to whose above you, knowing that God is above everyone so if they want you to do something in disobedience to God you can and should not follow them.
Ok-very interesting voting opinions 🤔. I am in favor limiting to taxpayers since it’s our money that is paying for all of these programs and who gets to pocket those dollars. It’ll incentivize everyone to contribute, be a part of this country and it’s moving parts. But I 1000% disagree with limiting to property owners. They are also affected by decisions on healthcare, job security due to immigration and border controls, ideology, Supreme Court justice picks, and much more.
The entire point of our system was to give everyone a voice. When property owners decide the policies, it becomes MUCH harder to become a property owner.
@@JesusSaves-JohnKJB Really? There are Christian men (or any men) who are OK with their wives and daughters submitting to any man, including predatory men?
@JesusSaves-JohnKJB this is why feminists use the term "patriarchy", with "toxic masculinity" in tandem. Because of the fundamentalist patriarchal view of biblical living is very toxic for women.
My husband effectively has two votes instead of one. He is much more theologically and politically knowledgeable that I am and I trust his judgement when I vote. Not to mention, voting for different candidates basically cancels our votes out. We do NFP to prevent pregnancy since we've only recently been married but once we are ready to start having kids, we will stop all birth control unless it would be harmful for me to get pregnant at some point. The main reason is that we want a large family and once we're in the childbearing stage of our marriage, we figure just bring it on!
A home just like a corporation runs far better with a designated leader. The designer and maker of the universe and all life should know what he is talking about.
There are different meanings for “head” in the koine Greek. In Koine Greek, the language of the New Testament, the word kephalē (“head”) also has metaphorical meanings; however “a person in authority over others” is not usually one of them. Nevertheless, many Christians have assumed that the Greek word kephalē refers to authority in the New Testament. Paul’s main point in the passage where this verse comes from (Col. 1:15-18) is to show that Jesus is the creator, origin, and beginning of everything in the universe. This includes Jesus being the “author” of the Church. Paul used the word kephalē (head) in this context-the context of origin and beginning or, as some say, “source.”[1] One compelling piece of evidence that kephalē did not usually refer to authority in first-century Koine Greek (or in Greek of previous centuries), is that LSJ’s lexicon, one of the most exhaustive lexicons of Ancient Greek, does not include any definition of kephalē that approximates “leader” or “person in authority.” [The entire LSJ entry on kephalē is here.] I can’t take credit for another’s work this is Marg Mowzcko and scholar who studies all women’s issues in scripture, who speaks and reads Greek and can read the Septuagint, the main source for the Apostles. God has given us all brains. He didn’t give men bigger or smarter brains. If God gave me a brain to use as he see fit, to learn, to make decisions, to judge then by all means it was meant to use in all these forms. He didn’t just give me a brain to eat, or wash clothes……so we are all made in his image and should reflect his intentions for us to carry out his example set for us by Christ. Like paying taxes as Jesus did, I’m sure the civic duty to vote is also in order. By using the intelligence and conviction he gives I will vote my own choice. For whomever I think will do a better job. I’m not American and not tied to a certain party in my country. So my vote fluctuates based on what the basis the party can give the country what it needs in that point of time.
Fascinatingly, the 10,000 words for women and less words from men has been recently debunked. Although it does seem that women tend to want to communicate more often generally.
I did a tiny, nonscientific study of men and women and their use of words. I sat down with about 6 men and 6 women, one a a time, and asked them several open ended questions. The women hands down used way more words. It was 1987 so I can't remember details, but the women would give me paragraph answers and the men would give me 2 yo 3 words or a sentence or two. I even cheated and asked the men if they wanted to add more. Nope.
@letfreedomring7330 There are exceptions to every rule. I can remember Amy Grant saying she was talking to strangers on her honeymoon with Gary Chapman because Gary wasn't talking. Then she got remarried to Vince Gill, and they make jokes about his two sentences per day quota or something like that.
I feel like everything at 5:00 is directed at me. My husband is reading the bible for the first time, and I'm finding it hard to not try and explain things away or downplay things that sound bad at first blush. This is why you should marry someone with the same religious views, though I do feel that I am learning and growing through this process too. It's really hard trying to be a good example of christianity to the one person you are supposed to be able to share your worst thoughts with. My husband saw all the evil in the world today, and wanted to go the complete oppsite direction.
Over the past year my husband and I decided on an open womb. We don’t prevent in any way OR try. This is not something my heart naturally desired 😅 BUT I was convicted about it over and over for several years. I kept trying to avoid the concept but He kept bringing it back to me and eventually, I surrendered my womb. I don’t hear enough people discuss the “why” in depth so I think I’m going to make a video about it. I know many Christians don’t like to talk about it because they want to hold on to their NFP but still; worth the conversation 🙏🏽
Same here for my husband and I, being open to children without prevention (unless medically necessary) is even frowned upon now amongst other Christian’s.We got married two years ago and planned on waiting a long time for kids and were convicted after a year and a half,we are now expecting our first baby and are so excited and at peace with not preventing even if we end up with a large family.Abby halbersat (I don’t that that’s the correct spelling) from the M is for Mama podcast is a really great example of a mother open to children with a large family who has managed to make it work
What needs to be shouted from the rooftop is the wonderful blessing children are. People get so focused on the issue of prevention and how many children to have- causing so much anxiety today today.
I've had multiple men on christian fb forums use scripture out of context, telling me to "submit" and "keep quiet" because I disagreed with their theology or politics and also a woman. The only men I will submit to are Christ, my husband, and church elders (though elders are only in the matters of church)... Not some random guy on fb. If he thinks he has the same authority in my life as my husband, he's being delusional.
I don’t think Christians are required to have children necessarily. Some Christian’s don’t want children or don’t see children as part of their life. There are other Christians who won’t find having children easy and don’t want to be upset trying if it doesn’t work out for them. Some Christians can’t afford to have children due their work or finances. There are some Christians who have a medical condition or genetic condition which would impact the child and that’s another reason some people choose not to have children . I also think churches should talk about it fostering or adopting more too. Please don’t get me wrong it’s lonely and exciting when peope have children but not all Christian couples will have children.
I think the issue lies in this - if God told them to have children despite all these things, would they? If not, they’re prioritizing convenience and comfort over a calling on their life. Anyone and everyone can make an excuse about why they shouldn’t have a child right now, can’t have a child right now, are done having kids, etc. But my first statement is something to ponder 🙏🏽
To say only property owners can vote is horrible. Corporations are buying up all the properties to rent out… Most Americans rent. Isn't affordable to buy a home.
Allie, you’d support only property owners being allowed to vote? 😳 What about those who rent? Thats 34% of the population who you’d not want to vote? Home ownership is no longer a realistic American Dream for most due to numerous factors. Some of the most hard working Americans aren’t able to purchase homes.
😊 we can communicate with her about it. My husband and I are now in out 40s but still don't own. A few years back we were in the market. But then it got really insane. People from CA who already owned sold their homes and were able to offer way over asking and win all the battles. Now the interest rates are SO HIGH. So we live on my friend's homestead And waiting on the Lord . I'm sure others can share their stories as well. We must trust the Lord . Also, please Christians, let's not make it our idol to have a home, farm or whatever. Keep God in his rightful place.
When you talked about deliverance ministries and how there's a special place in hell for those giving people false promises: this is really a blatant breach of the second commandment. They are abusing the Lord's name, and as it's written "for the LORD will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain". This is the serious meaning of this commandment.
Allie, I disagree with you that only property owners should have the right to vote. I just don’t understand the reasoning behind that line of thinking. You also didn’t really answer the question should women submit to voting the way their husbands vote. You said “one vote per family,” but that doesn’t answer the question. Personally, I don’t think it’s a biblical matter at all and while wives should submit to their husbands, voting should certainly be a personal choice. Submission can be taken to a silly extreme and voting choice is definitely that extreme. Should we also only listen to the music our husbands listen to or do only the hobbies our husbands like? Some things the Bible just doesn’t speak to and taking a biblical matter like submission to such an extreme can border on cultish. Love your show
1 Corinthians 5:12-14 But now I have written unto you not to keep company, if any man that is called a brother be a fornicator, or covetous, or an idolator, or a railer, or a drunkard, or an extortioner; with such an one no not to eat. 12 For what have I to do to judge them also that are without? do not ye judge them that are within? 13 But them that are without God judgeth. Therefore put away from among yourselves that wicked person. There are a lot of different types/kinds of judging that the Bible speaks of.
Another important note: the Bible is clear that judgment must first begin in the church, amongst His church. This means edifying in love to one another in the body and allowing God to bring us to conviction and repentance in private.
@alliebethatuckey someone told me I shouldn’t vote since I don’t understand why campaigns cost hundreds of millions of dollars. Do you agree with that too?
The podcast versus pastoral practice having to do with the preaching of sermons on behalf of God. That is an issue that is important. The sacramental issues are what make a wall of separation around pastor's issues that separate their words from podcast words. Sacraments can't be distributed over the internet, no matter how people would like to make that so for controlling and suffocating the Church on behalf of the Beast of Babylon.
Allie i enjoyed your programs, but I have a little bit of problem with the esv translation because Omitt some Bible verses compared to kjv and some are very important can you help me to understand why plz, thank you for all you do prayer for you and your family
Good answers, Allie! Love your podcast. ❤ May God bless you and your family, and this podcast. Have you ever heard of Folksandhymns? She plays guitar and sings, and does a great job. Who's your favorite singer? Women should be able to vote; they are important. It would be awful if babies were frozen forever. They are people. If a dude is in a ladies room, then he needs to get a spanking. Hippo and owl skeletons are scary. I don't support Trump, but I like Harris less.
Very careful about the submitting to your husband about staying home. It could have good intentions and he wants her to stay home to care for the kids instead of a daycare and he is ready to bare the burden of sole financial responsibility. That’s one possibility. But there are also evil men who want their wives to stay home so that they can have financial control over them and forcibly keep them in an abusive situation. Please be careful with your words. You can be using God to make a woman believe that she needs to stay in an abusive relationship. That is not Godly. Also, your statement about hormonal birth control is scientifically flawed. Hormonal birth control prevents ovulation from occurring and also thickens the cervix to prevent sperm from passing through. If taken as directed there is no egg to fertilize. Now your statement is correct when speaking about the copper iud. However that is not hormonal birth control. That does prevent an embryo from implanting. But again that is non hormonal. Please make sure you fully understand the science before you influence many women on something that is inherently incorrect.
Unfortunately you're wrong about this. Hormonal birth control fails quite frequently, and in those cases the hormones often prevent implantation which causes an abortion. This isn't new news, it's actually included in the drug facts that come with your birth control pills.
Allie is speaking from a biblical perspective and the underlying assumption is that this person is married to a Christian man who is following the guidance of the Holy Spirit and understands his role as the leader in his home. The bible clearly says that men need to love their wives as Jesus loves the church. That kind of love is not at all what you are talking about.
@@dana8208 then she needs to clarify that. Many times the Bible is used against women and this is why people is positions of influence need to be careful
If your stance is against homosexuals raising children, if that's your problem with IVF then you should probably start with the adoption system before IVF.
Use your time of singleness to seek the Lord. It’s a blessing that you can use this time. Also, reflect on yourself not just what you want in a wife. Are you preparing yourself to be a husband? Or just seeking a wife? Where are you looking for a wife? You will attract someone who is living a similar lifestyle, so think about how that’s been playing out in your life. There are many Christian women seeking to be married. You just haven’t met them yet 🙏🏽
Everything else OK, like even if I don't always agree, I get where things make sense from your perspective, but restricting voting to property owners? My parents were in the military. My first husband was in the military. None of them ever owned property. Ok so say of course military members can vote, regardless. What about me? I wasn't in the military. There are many many good responsible citizens who don't own their homes. They're still contributing to the economyby paying rent. What about people in retirement homes? What about people who live with family, or disabled people? This was kind of a not very well thought out statement. Not only is it elitist but it would also be a giant headache and huge expense to implement. It sounds so British (like 200 years ago). I own my home but I 100% support the voting rights of the renters who live in my neighborhood as long as they are citizens.
Disagree on property owner for voting for all of the obvious reasons of needing to poor and vulnerable to be considered as well as having their voices heard plus more and more you don't need to be poor in order to not afford a home. However taxpayers and ID... YES
After you had Mike ( the charlatan) Gendron on and not holding him accountable for the bull he was spewing about the Catholic faith , you showed me and many many others that you’re limited.
Not just the 19th. We need to be much closer to where the Founders started. Every person being able to vote to take things from other people is a disaster.
Stay at home, open womb, And many other things. Frankly, that's something that should be talked about before you put rings on your finger. I would also like to say that.Yeah, a woman should vote. If a woman ask me directions to the voting place if I know she's a leftist, I would probably give her the wrong directions.
I’m sorry, but telling girls that they don’t have to be nice to trans people? 🧐 And that they should ignore them? That does not sound Christ-like to me. Dehumanizing people you disagree with, especially when they are children, is doing so much damage to Christians’ witness.
@@wendymtzc It is not our responsibility to bully people out of their gender dysphoria. With attitudes like this so prevalent, it is little wonder more and more people are leaving their churches.
@@noelleleader6212 you don’t want that kind of people at church anyways, please read Romans 1 and see for yourself why they embrace that lifestyle and what God thinks about it
@@kamarwashington Kindness is. Love is. Peace is. Goodness is. Gentleness is. Is it any wonder that more Americans are eschewing Christianity when Christians are openly rationalizing away showing the same love to others that Christ shows to us? How can we both proclaim the transformative power of the Gospel and then refuse to transform how we treat others we disagree with? I weep for the non-believers who will read these types of comments and see their worst suspicions confirmed about what Christians are actually like. 😢
Suggest this hostess learn about Natural Family Planning (NFP) as taught by tge Catholic Church as part of education to young women and engaged and married couples. The topic is treated with respect and dignity of married couples as persons worthy of relational pepple with important roles in life..
You are not a Christian when you pick and choose what you want to follow or not follow. Jesus said you love me by keeping my commandments! 2 Timothy 3:16 All scripture is God breathed! That you must follow. Obediance is greater than sacrifice. King Saul found out the hard way
Hi Allie. I have an episode suggestion for your. Budgeting. I think a lot of women are the budgeters in the family and it would be nice to see an episode discussing debt, saving etc from a biblical view.
Love this idea. My husband brings home the bacon, and I take care of all budgeting and bills.
@@mfigueroa2079 why do you need a biblical view when it's a practical skill issue
@@WithMyOwnEars of course it’s a practical skill I didn’t say otherwise but with economy an episode on this topic would be very encouraging and not all people have this practical skill.Saving, budgeting, debt etc aligned with scripture and what it says can be super encouraging. A young listener, newly weds someone with lots of debt could find an episode like this helpful.
I don’t know that Allie is a certified financial planner or has the credentials to discuss finances like that. There are Christian financial advisers you can UA-cam if you want that type of guidance.
@@noelleleader 😂 of course I know she’s not a financial planner!! Hello…she can invite a guest. It’s just a suggestion, Geeze some people take things tooooo literal. 😅 have a good day and try to smile and relax.
Marry a WISE man. My father paid for my mother to go to law school in case he died she would be able to financially support herself and their 3 kids. When he died she was able to take care of herself and her kids.
I wanted a baby and had failed IVF. It ended up being a relief. God provided a baby to adopt. As a Christian, I MUST wait on God and His perfect plan. We can't let our desires overpower God's will. He will make it right. He has the best way.🙏
Amen.
Would you suggest that IVF is immoral now
My husband and I are “open womb” people lol! We are just Christians, not Catholics.
We don’t believe in preventing or trying, we just love freely! We have had three children, and hope for more ◡̈ babies are blessings!
One thing that is also really eye opening about this lifestyle is that you could have 20 kids or 0 kids and still be “open womb”. The whole point is surrendering your fertility, timing, and duration of growing your family to God.
It has personally shown our family that God will provide for all of the needs of your children and you and your spouse. Despite being very low income for the first 5/6 years of marriage, we always had enough, and honestly more than we need.
One of my husband’s fav verses:
“But there are some things that you cannot be sure of. You must take a chance. If you wait for perfect weather, you will never plant your seeds. If you are afraid that every cloud will bring rain, you will never harvest your crops.”
Ecclesiastes 11:4
I think if you're open to having as many kids as you can that's just great for you, you love kids, you're having a great time, you're probably young. But I don't think this belief should be placed onto others (not saying you are just speaking generally). For example I'm 41, I have 4 children, and I'm done. The thought of another pregnancy and going back to that new born phase is terrifying to me. I don't want to take the risk of having another child at my age when I already have 4 children and am really really struggling to keep my head above water as it is. God has given me the ability to choose whether or not to have more children to a certain degree, so I'm choosing not to have more.
We were too, until we weren’t 😁, my husband decided to stop at 5, I would have kept going but I totally understand his decision, he’s also older than me and we had our children when we were a bit older, but I’m glad we received these many blessings from the Lord, even when it’s challenging
We were open womb until I tried a vbac with my 2nd and my uterus ruptured.
Hey AllieBeth, I know you're well-known for doing "deep dives" into movements that claim Biblically sound doctrines. I'd really love to see you do one specifically on the "quiverfull" and "open womb" movements. It's very important to understand why these movements started, and the severe misconstrued intreprations of scripture within. Speaking as someone with degree in Theology & Biblical Studies. My main area of study was on legalistic abuse of scripture within the church. I took special interest in areas of families/mothers.
Now, here is my soap box:
These are not new movements, and have been taught to the church for decades (based off misconstrued scripture and influence of the Catholic church). I can give many specific examples. I'll note at the end of this comment.
I'm a "product" of these movements, (the youngest of 9 here) I've witnessed these bad doctrines destroy mothers and children. I can list a dozen names of mothers I PERSONALLY know who abandoned their families of 7+ children (and some of them even turning from Christ altogether) due to mental, emotional, and physical health deterioration. Mothers that ended up commiting suicide, or mental hospitals/straight jackets due to severe ongoing postpartum depression. Mothers that became unable to care, nurture, educate, or even give regular eye-contact to their younger children. These mothers were good women, just depeleted beyond functioning, unable to thrive as mothers (Some of them had tyrannical, abusive, and legalistic husbands. Some had good, loving and responsive husbands. I witnessed more negative than positives. But I don't see each of those mothers/childrens lives fully, only God does. I can only go off what I witnessed, studied, and worked with in 13 years of children/teens/college age ministry)
I witnessed the "parentification" of older siblings to take responsibility they were never meant to have, to "raise" their younger siblings... which caused their sibling relationship to be highly dysfunctional for the rest of their adulthood. It affected their marriages in how they operated with their spouses. I witnessing them face severe issues when they became parents themselves, due to a lack of a healthy role model, being unwanted children, or their mothers "giving up" long before they were born. That is taken directly into later life, psychologically. (Now if the mother was heavily supported by grandparents or other family, that often turned the tide significantly)
I've witnessed even witnessed these mothers in later years. For some of the mothers that were in "better situations" they were still theologically unprepared for pre-menopause... I know multiple women that were totally unprepared for multiple miscarriages in their 40's. But had already built their identity around the "open womb" teachings.
I have more than one example, but I remember working with a 50 yr old woman, who had 12 children. This woman had 13-17 miscarriages in the span of 5 years... this caused her body to deteriorate heavily, her mental state barely sustainable, her spiritual state a wreck. Her reproductive system literally prolapsing out of her body, chronic fatiuge, digestive disfunction, severe inflammation issues from the stress & hormone fluxes, had gained 180 lbs, ect ect. Her ignorant husband just kept telling her the Lord "would allow which baby should live, and take the others to heaven" Or, "Abraham and Sarah had a baby in their old age" I could have strangled him... total disregard for the disenergration of his wife's body, mental health, and spiritual health. (Also, a total misconstrued application of scripture). He was not fulfilling his Biblical role of ensuring his wife was flourishing. He just got s*x whenever he wanted, how he wanted.. he wasn't a bad man, he was just brainwashed by bad doctrine. Each miscarriage she had, her body was in an even worse state. When I worked with her, she could no longer carry a baby past 8 weeks. I was able to guide her through scripture for this topic, show her what was happening for her body, and a book on natural family planning. I told her what to discuss with her husband. 10 months later, she had dropped 115lbs, was in excellent health, had tons more energy for her young children and first grandchild. Her mental and spiritual state was shockingly better. All because no more miscarriages, they started family planning and let her body finish menopause. She actually began having a significantly better relationship with her husband & children too!
(Note from earlier: Gen 38:9-11. The catholic church taught he was killed for "preventing life" and influenced the Chrisitan church. This createdba major root for both bad doctrines. But by context as a whole, and the Jewish cultural context, he was killed for refusing to uphold responsibilities to his dead brother via levirate marriage. It wasn't the specifically the act of "birth control" he was killed for, it was for disobeying Gods command and dishonoring Jewish custom/law. But it's easy to twist this scrupture to blame "birth control" exclusively to appear as the only offense to God. This simply is NOT true. These a ton of other examples like this, where scripture is taken out of context.
We also have to note, rhe men of scripture that had 8+ children were equivalent to multi millionaires for their time. They often had more than one wife AND dozens of servants to care for the children. They could provide for, feed, and protect their numerous children. Many other men in scripture had few or even no children. Jospeh only had 2 children, was he any less favored, blessed, or loved by God for it? No. But those examples are conviently forgotten about.
Proverbs is where much of these doctrines pull from, but it is a book of "wisdom & disciplines" NOT Biblical commandments.
As Christ followers, we to follow commands in the Old Testament IF they are repeated by Jesus in the New Testament. Jesus does NOT say to "be fruitful and multiply" he commands to "go out and make disciplines". We see this displayed directly in the lives of his 12 Disciples, most are recorded to have only 1-3 children, some remained unmarried.)
I'm not anti-big family, there are a FEW families I saw do big families well... But it seriously peeves be that both "open womb" and "quiverfull" movements imply that you are more spiritual, more faithful to God the more children you have. The implication is you'l should be "more respected" by the church, and if you have a small family you are "less than" (tell that to women with multiple miscarriages, who wanted more kids). I've watched this play out to create highly legalistic & spiritually, emotionally, and physiologically abusive scenarios within the church & famlies. Treating children as means to boost ones own ego, and treating their wives like a "breeder" slave... I'm not even exaggerating. That is unbiblical. That is no better than how pagan religions allow their wives to be treated. That is a direct representation of the Curse from the Fall of Adam and Eve.
I appreciate your comments. A lot of these pro life stances are rooted in Roman Catholic teaching. I had a friend who nuanced having my tubes tied after #6 was like a abortion. Btw I went to a natural birth control tracking the fertile/non fertile cycle with green, yellow, and red stickers. It was taught by an RC nun. Using that system I had #5.
@@Susan-f5u I appreciate you mentioning that! It's so important as Christians to realize how much we need to separate Roman Catholic influence from Christian Doctrine. As much of the Catholic influence directs us to live by "works" rather than living by the Grace Jesus Christ, and his atonement for us.
@@MJ-jw8nb Do you have any links to anything you have written on this subject? I read years ago that the RC church in Italy taught that women were not to be given pain relief during childbirth because the Lord said they would have pain and sorrow in childbirth due to Eve’s sin in disobedience. But I noticed in the NT that Jesus had compassion and healed people as not only a sign of His miraculous deity, but also the character of God’s compassion.
@@Susan-f5u I'm so sad, because I had a thoughtful and in-depth response for you!! But when I went back, the comment had disappeared! :'( Perhaps you could check your email for the notification? Since UA-cam will send email notifications and the written comment responses, it should still appear there, even if UA-cam erased it here.
@@MJ-jw8nb I checked e-mail and spam and did not receive it. Over a year ago Google had me set up new account and I changed address.
I’m not sure I entirely agree about DACA. Lots of kids were brought here as young children. The US is the only home many of them have ever known. I think it’s cruel to deport automatically those in that situation. I think the system should prioritize helping those youth with their path to citizenship. A child can’t help that their parent broke the law.
Wholeheartedly agree.
Sorry but they need to realize they can't just come here with their kids or have kids and be anchored. The cycle continues. You have to no longer have the incentives.
And a lot of them are “Americanized”. I know some who don’t completely speak the language of their country of origin.
@@jgal6620 yeah but that’s just penalizing children who had no choice in the matter. Penalize the parents who actually did the crime knowingly.
@@jgal6620 Jesus' earliest years were then, according to the Gospel of Matthew, spent as a refugee in a foreign land, and then as a displaced person in a village a long way from his family's original home. Would it not be better then to try to understand the predicament as humans and as children especially to help better them instead of despise them?
There are some issues that should be discussed before getting married. Whether you are a stay at home mom or you are in the workforce is one of them.
Women generally change their mind as their brains change by the process of becoming a mother. Thankfully, getting married older, we did have that discussion and I was very open that a baby = retirement for me. Husband was fully on board.
I have DACA I came to the US at the age of 7. I don't take Allie's point personal and still choose to listen to her. So demure and mindful of me lol. I love listening to her biblical take on different topics. You're awesome for not backing down Allie!
Narrowing to property ownership?!? That’s ridiculous!!! What about all the millennials who are saving hard but are in their 30s and still can’t buy a house due to our insane economy?
Only the men who owned property could vote before the 19th amendment
@@TheRinergirl I know that. That was then and this is now. What's your point?
Hey Allie, I’m a 59 year old preachers wife who didn’t own a house/property until 6 years ago. Surely you don’t think people like me who didn’t have the money to buy a house shouldn’t be able to vote?!! You said “property owners.” That should not be the qualification for voting.
Thank you for saying this!
I wholeheartedly agree! My 18 year old son and 20 year old daughter are engaged in politics and current issues but they don’t own property yet. Their vote should count because they are of age and are a legal citizen of this country with an ID to prove it.
Yes! This episode by far is one of the most simple minded things I think I’ve ever heard Allie say. I watch most of her episodes and she went too far with this one. Women and all US citizens have the right to vote!
In the past it was property owners. I believe she means to say household vote. Whether or not you own a property, I would agree that a household vote makes more sense than allowing every individual over 18 to vote.
@@raquelw8124 i believe only having an id is why we are where we are, but okie.
Allie, I am utterly disappointed in your comments regarding DACA. It is evident from your comments that you know very little about the issue or have a very narrow-minded perspective on it. I am a DACA recipient, and here's my story. My mother came to the United States after my father abandoned her, my brother, and me. The home in which she was staying was abusive and toxic, so she fled with my brother, who was two years old at the time, and I was six months old. She came to the United States hoping to provide for and protect her children. Once here, she worked long days and nights without ever having to apply for food stamps or government assistance. She always told me, "I came here seeking an opportunity, not to become someone else's charity case." Growing up, I did not go to dentist appointments, doctor visits, or annual exams. We did not have health insurance, nor could we afford it.
Despite all these hardships, my mother's top priority was ensuring my brother and I did well in school, had enough food and a roof over our heads. I'm 24 years old now, and have known no other home other than my hometown in Kansas City. I went to college, graduated with a Bachelor's degree in Data Analytics, and am going back to school for my Master's in the spring. My brother decided not to go to College but instead, went to Barber school, got his license, and is self-employed. I'm aware not every DACA recipient's situation is the same as mine. However, that is exactly my point. The particular example you shared does not speak to situations like mine. I also believe you showed no empathy for people like me. I had no say in the matter. I was simply brought here, but I am so grateful that I was.
Allie, I'm not saying not to talk about this issue. There are a lot of problems currently with it. However, it's not as black and white as you paint it to be. And it's completely misleading of you to discuss a topic with very little knowledge to your large audience.
Tell me, honestly, that you would not leave a corrupt country, an abusive household, travel across dry land and across rivers if that meant you had a chance to provide a better life for your children? If, after reading this, your opinion has not changed, then tell me honestly, where would you like me to go? Where should I call home?
I grew up in a country where my family always followed the immigration laws. I was never without a visa and alien residence permit. That country still never provided me with a pathway to citizenship. Even to obtain permanent residence there I would have to leave as an adult and come back for a job that would employ me as a non-citizen. Is it unjust of that country to not give me a way to become a citizen even though I never chose to be born there and spend all my life growing up there? Maybe, but it's how countries all around the world run things. I recognize it's the law and that order is necessary for fairness to exist. I'd like to see that country allow people like me who grew up there and always followed the immigration laws to become citizens, but I also recognize that not following the law in that area would never help my case. Some countries like the US are much more flexible and generous than others in that area, and in some ways the DACA situation is a result of the US' flexibility there and failure to uphold fair order all over again after the amnesty under Reagan. Whatever the solution, I think we do need to make sure that order exists for fairness and that laws are meant to uphold order for that reason. Bypassing or undermining the law is not the solution.
I’m glad your mom escaped that situation, and I’m glad you are a productive member of our country. However you must understand that no country can withstand the onslaught of tens of millions of people moving here illegally, especially in a short period of time. There are big incentives which drive this migration, and DACA is just one of many of these incentives. The areas in my state with high migrant populations are socially and fiscally devastated; school systems and health systems overrun, property taxes out of control, American citizens pushed out of work, etc. I work in a hospital in a town with a very large migrant population, and we struggle financially to stay open because so many of the patients we treat can’t pay. And, perhaps the most troubling, the number of American citizens who are now alcoholics or drug addicted is staggering. These people’s jobs have either been shipped overseas or shifted to migrants. You have to understand that the large corporations and billionaires are taking advantage of this situation in order to benefit from cheap labor, rather than paying people livable wages. This cycle perpetuates the wealth gap in this country.
If I’m hungry, it is still wrong to steal. My experience is my husband’s business struggling and being forced out of California because we can’t compete with the cheap labor from undocumented immigrants. Mind you they were HARD workers who did great work. But because they were paid under the table, they harm other hard working people. How did your mom work all of those years? If her employment was not through legal means, I guarantee it hurt other people. No one thinks about the other business who do things right and pay workman’s comp and payroll taxes and are constantly under bid. The issue is you feel your mom was completely justified in all of her actions and there is zero remorse. It is a messy situation because my compassionate heart wants to be generous to the children, but the kids don’t realize it’s the parents who put them in this cruel situation.
@@dv9360 DACA, in its current state, is not a pathway to citizenship. I must renew my application every two years and pay $600; I recognize I will always remain with a DACA status unless the law changes. I shared my story with Allie not to raise the question of what is fair and what isn't; my main goal was to lay out my particular situation that demonstrates this is not a black-and-white issue as she's painting it to be.
@@MFPWM2010 Trust me, I hear you. I agree with your point here. No country should simply ignore mass immigration. I recognize a country must enforce its laws to maintain a functioning society and to keep its citizens safe. My main goal in sharing my story is to bring a real-life scenario of a recipient of DACA to show that it's not as black and white as Allie states in her words here, "I don't like it. I think it's a whole horrible system that we have put in place. We're talking about 17-year-old boys. We're not talking about 3-year-old toddlers; we're talking about 17-year-old boys considered minors, and they get to come here and not get deported because of DACA. First of all, I think how it was decided and how it was implemented was completely unconstitutional, and I do not believe that any illegal alien should be allowed in the United States, I don't." (Allie Beth Stuckey 2024, time 19:24)
She's wrong in saying: "they get to come here and not get deported." Someone who does not know the requirements of DACA might interpret that as saying, a 17-year-old boy from Mexico or anywhere else can come to the US, apply for DACA, and avoid deportation when that is not the case at all. Here are the requirements for DACA:
a.) You must have been under the age of 31 on June 15, 2012 (which is when the program first started.)
b.) You must have entered the country before your 16th birthday.
c.) Must have lived continuously in the United States from June 15, 2007, up until the current present time. You have to prove your physical presence.
d.) Have completed high school or a GED, have been honorably discharged from the armed forces, or are enrolled in school.
e.) Have not been convicted of a felony or a serious misdemeanor and do not otherwise pose a threat to national security or public safety.
The majority of us DACA recipients were brought here by our parents; the US is the only home we've ever known. I'm open to discussing why a country must have laws on immigration. That's great and all, but let's also have the difficult conversation that this affects individuals like me; individuals who have built their whole lives here. I don't appreciate that Allie dehumanizes DACA recipients. That's not Christ-like at all, if she wants to have a true discussion on her podcast, she must get informed or bring someone with background and experience on the topic.
It would be very unfair to allow those who only own property to vote. I do agree you need to be a citizen to vote and I think showing ID to vote is absolutely valid. Politics matter because policies matter because people matter
I was thinking the same thing. I live in California and am blessed to be a property owner, but there is a huge population of my church and our whole state who can’t afford to own property here, but are good citizens, paying taxes and being a benefit to society. I would love Allie to explain her position and hopefully rethink that idea.
@@mrsjennym yes, II have a problem with that. I rent. So does that mean that I shouldn't be allowed to vote? And many elderly people sell their property and no longer own property, so does that mean they shouldn't vote?
The concept of having to own property to vote is not a bad one. But, I think we need to change the concept to be only tax payers that are actual citizens. This way, those U.S. citizens that rent their homes will have a say with their vote. If a person pays into the tax system, they should have a say in how that money is being used and who will represent them. So, same concept with a modified application.
I believe just a kind of citisenship test or voter license would be good. To make sure someone understand about basics principles of the politics and the country, being of sound mind, etc, similar to a license to drive
Can you vote without showing an ID in the States??
Your husband should value your wishes. Blind obedience is not biblical submission to your spouse.
Certainly it depends on the wishes and the circumstances. Not any wish.
I've cocluded a good model of devision making might be: 1. talk about a decision/ vision/ idea. 2. Pray about it together and or separately. 3. Come back together to talk. Husband decides.
I fell into a philosophy I heard thru Dr. Phil "two messes, one no". I didn't recognize that was giving me tie breaker/veto power. I could shoot down anything I didn't like. That means I'm in charge as the woman.
What do you think is biblical submission to your husband?
@@jamesg3808 Paul never tells husbands to lead or have authority over their wives; he tells them to love their wives. He uses the word “love” 6 times when addressing husbands in Ephesians 5. Leadership is not mentioned, and I think we’ve poorly understood the verses that mention submission. Marg Mowzcko.
Submission means obedience. Just as when the church submits to God, it means obeying God in all things
So here is my take on birth control as a 30 year old mom who has four kids five and under: during my last c section with my now 9 month old son, I got a tubal ligation done. It was something that my husband and I prayerfully considered and felt was the right choice for our family. I’ve been pregnant and breastfeeding non stop for 6 years now and my OB told me that he is concerned about potentially doing a fifth c section on me, especially because we have babies so close together. This was an emotional decision for me because I love being pregnant, I love babies, I love my children. But we’re okay with being done and I don’t think that we have sinned in our decision. So this issue is not black and white. I think choosing to limit the number of children you have is a matter of conscience in the liberty of the believer and it depends person to person.
It's called Natural Family Planning.
@@Just.A.Little.Gem.exactly. It’s sinful to separate sex from the procreative aspect. That is why God made sex! You can practice abstinence during the times when you could become pregnant. That would be good for you spiritually.
It is not sinful! Are you serious!? The Bible never says sex is only for having children!
@alishamashburn412 we didn't say that. It serves two purposes and you cannot divorce one from the other. Bonding and babies,
Aside from it being generally imprudent to make such a permanent decision at a time of total fatigue, it is indeed sinful to directly and intentionally destroy the gift of fertility through sterilization. It doesn’t mean that every couple is required to have as many children as possible (my husband and I only have two because of health reasons), but we cannot intentionally thwart the marital act, therefore perverting (in the true meaning of the word) Gods natural law.
I really liked the portion about having doubts. I would even like an episode on this. I think we all go through this but get self concious to admit it and talk about it, and felt a real connection hearing about it from someone else. Thank you for being honest and candid and not ashamed!
I grew up in a religion called Laestadian Lutheran. They don't allow birth control or any family planning whatsoever. I'm from a family of 12kids. Families of 9-18 are the norm. Let me just say there are alot of dysfunctional families there and most people have some sort of attachment disorder. It is very difficult for a mother who is perpetually pregnant to meet the needs of the child. She may love them all the same but from my own experience, the parents can not fully take care of all the emotional and spiritual needs of the child. Many of these people are not actually choosing this lifestyle, it's being chosen for them so they are not intentional about raising their kids. My husband and I left that church a long time ago but I always laugh when people who have no experience at all of living in a family of an "open womb" think it's just fine and dandy.
@@avaglynn1 I believe it's controlling and abusive to teach it's a sin to use contraception. You give up your own free will and sometimes your health to your community.
I'm disabled so... NO you shouldn't have to own property or pay taxes. There were yrs I worked and owned a home, but don't punish me because I'm sick and live under the poverty level.
This was a good episode! I appreciate her continuing to speak out against IVF! How we treat the least of these matters to the Lord. I have yet to see someone defend IVF from the perspective of the children who are sentenced to a process in which they have a very little chance of surviving.
In that respect, how is it any different than getting pregnant naturally? Most pregnancies end in miscarriage, often before the woman even knows she is pregnant. There is a high chance of the fertilized egg not being able to successfully grow and survive, but women still knowingly try to get pregnant. What is the difference?
@@noelleleaderOne’s natural and one isn’t. That’s the difference. Children shouldn’t be commoditized out of selfish desires.
Simple answer:
"Wives, submit to your husbands as to The Lord. For the husband is head of the wife, as Christ is head of the church...."
Ephesians 5:22-23.
I appreciate your simplicity, but unfortunately it's not simple: "But God said to him, “Do not be so distressed about the boy and your slave woman. Listen to whatever Sarah tells you, because it is through Isaac that your offspring[a] will be reckoned." Genesis 21:12
Considering that you just posted verses that say nothing about voting or the political order, this means little without further interpretation.
@@jahnvantuttlesma8215 They clearly did it for attention.
@@aloe704 That passage is not addressing a saved born-again believer who is part of the church age-which if you are saved you are a part of. Many of the epistles have instruction for saved born-again believers on how to live a spirit filled life to have a victorious Christian life. You can’t just pull any verse out of any book and assume it’s addressing you today. That makes for very bad doctrine.
2 Timothy 2:16 Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth.
@@JesusSaves-JohnKJB The same could be applied
Happy to narrow voting rights exclusively to property owners?!? You’re wild for that one,Allie 😭🤦♀️🙃.
65%+ of military members are renters- they can die for our country but not vote 🗳️
I know she didn't elaborate, but everyone I've ever heard go in-depth on supporting limited franchise also supports service-based voting rights. The intention is to prevent people who haven't demonstrated a stake in the long-term future of the country from voting and there are a lot of dimensions we could filter on to accomplish that: property ownership, marriage and children, military service, etc.
@lukedornon7799 that seems like a huge undertaking for our society. Every person would have to fill out a questionnaire to determine their eligibility and then provide documentation or proof. Then there's obviously room for fraud. Seems like too much of a hassle in my opinion.
@@camillemitchell301 You do realize we already have systems in place to verify people's eligibility to vote, right? Something being a hassle isn't much of an argument by itself for why we shouldn't do it.
Narrowing voting to property owners is the stupidest thing I have ever heard. As the economy worsens, fewer people own homes and have to rent. This opinion is very poorly thought out, then again I am reminded that Allie used to work for Fox News
I don’t think she truly thinks that’s the answer, but clearly she knows the history of voting.
And actually when only property owners did vote in the past and the proposition for women to vote was made, most women were against the idea. They wanted men to take the lead.
Of course we can’t go backwards and I don’t think that is necessarily the answer nor do I really think Allie thinks that’s the answer but I bet you she knows the depth of the history behind that comment and that’s why she said it.
Allie has had a lot of poorly thought-out takes lately, the quality of the show has declined.
This is what the Bible teaches and I believe and support.
You mean, "What some old men, 1500 years ago, gathered into a book, excluding things that didn't support a strong central church, you believe and support." There, fixed it for you.
@@confuse3671
First of all, they were not all old men. It is a book authored by many people over many hundreds of years. Furthermore it is considered to be the Word of God. To many many people. A guiding light for many. Just because you don’t believe in God or His Son Jesus Christ doesn’t make it any less true.
Lol which interpretation?
You know you can own property in USA without being a citizen - hardly a qualification to vote.
Also, the US supreme court has already ruled that denying the right to vote based on property ownership was a violation of the 14th Amendments equal protect clause. Asked and answered - you are wrong.
Interesting. How do you feel about the 3/5ths rule as the Supreme Court decided it? Asked and answered, eh?
@@alex43223 What case do you think involved the Supreme Court deciding on the 3/5ths rule? There is no such case. And the 14th Amendment explicitly repealed the rule, so that's another level on which your argument does not make sense.
@@allyjmjmThe Supreme Court flip flops on decisions all the time. They aren’t necessarily a standard for how things ought to be.
@@kamarwashington it does not flip flop on basic things such as whether black people count as full people or states can require literacy tests to limit who can vote
@@allyjmjm They ruled that abortion was protected under the 14th amendment and now it’s not. This is evidence that similar precedents can be set or unset involving the 14th amendment. I’m sure you can agree that this was a rather significant change. This is why they aren’t necessarily a standard for what ought to be.
"Only home owners allowed to vote" really? I think you should expand on that statement a LOT more. Please, make your reasoning behind believing this, make sense. Tia.
Before the 19th amendment only the men who owned property could vote.
@@TheRinergirl before the old testament only sacrifice was law.
I'm so disappointed. I think Ally has shown some colour that I don't agree with. Her type of 'Christianity' is borderline snobery! I'm hurting saying that.
She hasn't replied. Enough said.
My biggest issue with deliverance ministries is that they claim Christians who are born again can have demons inside them.
My biggest gripe with deliverance ministries, alongside what you just said, is they do not properly prepare their congregation or individuals for the snare of divination and mysticism. So often do I see people involved in them glorify the manifestations they have seen. I have seen them, myself. I don't want to tell stories about what I have seen, I want to tell the good news about how Jesus has saved me.
Can you be born again more than once? Asking for those Christians living in sin.
I have had demons inside me. I have felt them. I'm a Christian.
I felt the shift between me & them looking thru me. And I heard them in my thoughts.
It’s a secondary issue but I don’t think it should be outright dismissed. There’s a book by Rebecca Brown called He Came to Set the Captives Free. She helped a high ranking satanist leave satanism after 2 decades being involved in it. Although, she (ex satanist) accepted Jesus she still needed deliverance from all the demons and “protectors” which took a while. That didn’t make her any less of a real Christian.
@@opinionbytriz www.gotquestions.org/Christian-demon-possessed.html
Read your Bible 🙏🏽 Clear your mind of what you *think* deliverance means, and read the Word. Pray about it beforehand, seek the Lord. He will reveal it to you 🥰
IF WOMEN WERE in THE SAME CONDITION AS WHEN WOMEN HAD NO RIGHTS ALLEY BETH STUCKEY WOULD NOT HAVE HER SHOW!!!!!!!!!
THANK YOU 👏🏼
Ok, but what rights are you referring to? Women have had the right to vote for over 100 years,, own property for over 150. Women have had the right to divorce their husbands since 1937 and as of today very sadly, there are still states where women can get a late term abortion. Women can fight in combat, women can own firearms. What conditions and from when are you talking about?
I disagree with saying it’s a submit to your husband issue. Husbands are also called to submit to their wives. If he is forcing her to stay at home, that is not love. If she is being stubborn and unwavering, that is not loving either. They need to pray about this together. And seek wise, biblical counsel if necessary.
Where does it say that husbands should submit to their wives 🤔
Where in the Bible does it specifically address men to "submit to their wives?"
Sorry, my bad. It doesn’t say that. But it still calls the man to love. And forcing a woman to be a stay at home mom when she doesn’t want to, is not love.
@@emilygodwin4480 Yes, the man should love his wife, and the wife should submit to him. The ideal situation is for the wife to prioritize caring for the home and the children over a job or career outside the home. If she does not want to stay at home, there is a reason for that, and she should ask herself what that reason is. Sometimes, there is economic stress where the wife may temporarily work a job to help financially, which is unfortunate but a common situation. However, if the wife wants to prioritize a long-term career because she wants to prove that she "can do anything a man can do" and "does not need a man" then her desire is coming from a place of arrogance, and she needs to change her heart.
@emilygodwin4480 Possibly, but it's not about them. It's about the kids. About what the Lord. What's best for the kids. If they are Christian, the husband would have consulted God & then decided that it is indeed better for the kids & family for her to be a sahm.... she must submit & does NOT mean he is unloving. It's actually the opposite.
My husband and I are living with my daughter. She is taking care of us. Without her we would not be able to live at home. God bless you.
"Please don't equate a podcast.. to combat" I LOVE YOU
Humans have free will for a reason.
Submission is a freewill act, not an enforced one.
Ephesians is filled with military terminology (ex. putting on the armor of God), and the command for wives to submit to their husbands is no different. As I understand it, the submissive position on the battlefield is the position holding the shields so that the dominant positions can focus on effectively using their spears. The one holding the shield is no less valuable than the one holding the spear, but rather, the two work together. The shield defends while the spear attacks.
No, Ephesians is not filled with military terminology. Yes, there is the illustration of putting on the full armor of God but there is zero military thought in instructions of wives being subject to their husbands.
@@dpastor6631 Perhaps you need to go back and give it another read... perhaps use a concordance to assist as you try to increase your understanding
I am shocked that the question about women's right to vote even came up!!!!! I understand submitting but this is crazy
Why…it is a very recent thing in the course of human history. The Bible does not say “women shall have the right to vote.” I can understand your disagreement with it, but that doesn’t make it crazy.
It actually was not crazy. The voting system back then was based on a household vote (with the man voting because he was seen as the head of the household) rather than an individual vote, which is what we are familiar with today. I highly encourage you to actually research the history of voting in the U.S. and understand why things were the way they were, rather than arrogantly assuming that everyone back then was "crazy" while you are somehow more "enlightened."
Not crazy at all. Logical. If women run the world and want to be boss over men in general, of course what follows is voting rights, equal rights, and unfortunately even wanting to transition to being male or acting like a male. None of it is Gods best for us or His original design. How we feel about it doesn’t matter actually. The world doesn’t work very well recently and that’s a fact.
I thought so too but hear me out: I believe Allie is coming from the context that if a husband and wife are married and living by the Word, they are one. This means they most likely share the same stance on who to vote for. Therefore her husband’s stance is also her stance, it’s just under his name. Historically, women have been covered by their husband, thus they were known as Mr and Mrs (last name) or sometimes even Mr and Mrs (husbands first and last name). This obviously has a bunch of context to it that we don’t live in a society anymore but I think that’s where she was coming from 🤷🏽♀️ in an ideal world where women are not devalued
@Madreministry my husband and I voted differently. I'm so thankful I get to have my own vote.
I'm curious as to who watches Allie's kids while she's at work doing her show? Her husband? A nanny? Why isn't she a SAHM? She seems to want the rest of us to be.
I'm a 64 yr old single woman with no children and I like to watch your podcast and agree with you on most everything you say.
Not all deliverance takes place as you described. There are pastors and missionaries who humbly practice deliverance.
May not agree with you on all issues, but really love your podcast! ❤
My husband doesn’t want me to stay home with the children, but I do. Is that a submit to your husband issue?
Yup, he's da boss 😂
I believe we are meant to submit to our heads (women to their husbands, men to their elders, ect.) unless they are leading you into sin. So basically submit to whose above you, knowing that God is above everyone so if they want you to do something in disobedience to God you can and should not follow them.
Need more information about each of your reasons. You should get some wise cousel on this from the elders in your church
Is it because of money? 😒 Because if that's the case, I understand why he wouldn't want you to. Children are expensive, objectively.
@HeatherShelton-yq1il where does it say that elders are the head of a husband?
Canon+ not only has a huge selection of children’s material such as books and videos but, it also has wonderful material for the whole family!!!
The way of grace is for all!
Ok-very interesting voting opinions 🤔. I am in favor limiting to taxpayers since it’s our money that is paying for all of these programs and who gets to pocket those dollars. It’ll incentivize everyone to contribute, be a part of this country and it’s moving parts. But I 1000% disagree with limiting to property owners. They are also affected by decisions on healthcare, job security due to immigration and border controls, ideology, Supreme Court justice picks, and much more.
Her views are horrific and show priviledge mindset. She basically exludes poor people from voting.
The entire point of our system was to give everyone a voice. When property owners decide the policies, it becomes MUCH harder to become a property owner.
My thoughts exactly..
Wives submit to their husbands not to every man on earth.
No one in the history of mankind has ever taught that all women should submit to all men.
@@jamesg3808 Some men do believe that. I could name a specific channel where you can find thousands of men who think like that…but I won’t.
@@jamesg3808 Oh there are definitley "Christian" men that believe that. I've had them tell me that.
@@JesusSaves-JohnKJB Really? There are Christian men (or any men) who are OK with their wives and daughters submitting to any man, including predatory men?
@JesusSaves-JohnKJB this is why feminists use the term "patriarchy", with "toxic masculinity" in tandem. Because of the fundamentalist patriarchal view of biblical living is very toxic for women.
There are some great deliverance ministries out there. BUT very few. I’d say out of all of them I’ve found maybe a handful are legit. Possibly 3-4.
Who do you think is legit?
@@RCGWhoIsaiah Saldivar, Jenny Weaver, Vlad are the only ones I’ve really listened to.
@@lamariquita_those are not legit ministries. Those are hyper charismatic sensationalists who are extremely misinformed about the bible
@@Pearls_of_Graceyou don’t have to follow them. Go on your own way.
If your husband wants you to stay home, you are BLESSED! Accept what he is willing to do for you and your family as a gift ❤🎉
My husband effectively has two votes instead of one. He is much more theologically and politically knowledgeable that I am and I trust his judgement when I vote. Not to mention, voting for different candidates basically cancels our votes out.
We do NFP to prevent pregnancy since we've only recently been married but once we are ready to start having kids, we will stop all birth control unless it would be harmful for me to get pregnant at some point. The main reason is that we want a large family and once we're in the childbearing stage of our marriage, we figure just bring it on!
In the old testament, it was always the head of each household who would represent the family's interests.
@@nerychristianIn the old Testament they had kings!!!!!!!!!! There was No voting!
A home just like a corporation runs far better with a designated leader. The designer and maker of the universe and all life should know what he is talking about.
Husbands forcing women to do things is evil
There are different meanings for “head” in the koine Greek. In Koine Greek, the language of the New Testament, the word kephalē (“head”) also has metaphorical meanings; however “a person in authority over others” is not usually one of them. Nevertheless, many Christians have assumed that the Greek word kephalē refers to authority in the New Testament. Paul’s main point in the passage where this verse comes from (Col. 1:15-18) is to show that Jesus is the creator, origin, and beginning of everything in the universe. This includes Jesus being the “author” of the Church. Paul used the word kephalē (head) in this context-the context of origin and beginning or, as some say, “source.”[1] One compelling piece of evidence that kephalē did not usually refer to authority in first-century Koine Greek (or in Greek of previous centuries), is that LSJ’s lexicon, one of the most exhaustive lexicons of Ancient Greek, does not include any definition of kephalē that approximates “leader” or “person in authority.” [The entire LSJ entry on kephalē is here.]
I can’t take credit for another’s work this is Marg Mowzcko and scholar who studies all women’s issues in scripture, who speaks and reads Greek and can read the Septuagint, the main source for the Apostles.
God has given us all brains. He didn’t give men bigger or smarter brains. If God gave me a brain to use as he see fit, to learn, to make decisions, to judge then by all means it was meant to use in all these forms. He didn’t just give me a brain to eat, or wash clothes……so we are all made in his image and should reflect his intentions for us to carry out his example set for us by Christ. Like paying taxes as Jesus did, I’m sure the civic duty to vote is also in order. By using the intelligence and conviction he gives I will vote my own choice. For whomever I think will do a better job. I’m not American and not tied to a certain party in my country. So my vote fluctuates based on what the basis the party can give the country what it needs in that point of time.
Fascinatingly, the 10,000 words for women and less words from men has been recently debunked. Although it does seem that women tend to want to communicate more often generally.
I did a tiny, nonscientific study of men and women and their use of words. I sat down with about 6 men and 6 women, one a a time, and asked them several open ended questions. The women hands down used way more words. It was 1987 so I can't remember details, but the women would give me paragraph answers and the men would give me 2 yo 3 words or a sentence or two. I even cheated and asked the men if they wanted to add more. Nope.
Women talk way more than men. Men find is draining to talk a lot about personal things. But women seem to love talking about personal things.
@@nerychristian I often hear two things: 1. Women complaining he doesn't talk enough and 2. Men complaining that she talks too much.
My husband and I are flipped backwards on this issue. He talks more and uses way too many words.
@letfreedomring7330 There are exceptions to every rule.
I can remember Amy Grant saying she was talking to strangers on her honeymoon with Gary Chapman because Gary wasn't talking. Then she got remarried to Vince Gill, and they make jokes about his two sentences per day quota or something like that.
I feel like everything at 5:00 is directed at me. My husband is reading the bible for the first time, and I'm finding it hard to not try and explain things away or downplay things that sound bad at first blush. This is why you should marry someone with the same religious views, though I do feel that I am learning and growing through this process too. It's really hard trying to be a good example of christianity to the one person you are supposed to be able to share your worst thoughts with. My husband saw all the evil in the world today, and wanted to go the complete oppsite direction.
Over the past year my husband and I decided on an open womb. We don’t prevent in any way OR try. This is not something my heart naturally desired 😅 BUT I was convicted about it over and over for several years. I kept trying to avoid the concept but He kept bringing it back to me and eventually, I surrendered my womb. I don’t hear enough people discuss the “why” in depth so I think I’m going to make a video about it. I know many Christians don’t like to talk about it because they want to hold on to their NFP but still; worth the conversation 🙏🏽
Same here for my husband and I, being open to children without prevention (unless medically necessary) is even frowned upon now amongst other Christian’s.We got married two years ago and planned on waiting a long time for kids and were convicted after a year and a half,we are now expecting our first baby and are so excited and at peace with not preventing even if we end up with a large family.Abby halbersat (I don’t that that’s the correct spelling) from the M is for Mama podcast is a really great example of a mother open to children with a large family who has managed to make it work
What needs to be shouted from the rooftop is the wonderful blessing children are. People get so focused on the issue of prevention and how many children to have- causing so much anxiety today today.
Open Womb here
We were “open womb” people until my uterus ruptured during my attempted vbac.
With your wisdom he gave you a the freedom to make choices
I've had multiple men on christian fb forums use scripture out of context, telling me to "submit" and "keep quiet" because I disagreed with their theology or politics and also a woman. The only men I will submit to are Christ, my husband, and church elders (though elders are only in the matters of church)... Not some random guy on fb. If he thinks he has the same authority in my life as my husband, he's being delusional.
I don’t think Christians are required to have children necessarily.
Some Christian’s don’t want children or don’t see children as part of their life. There are other Christians who won’t find having children easy and don’t want to be upset trying if it doesn’t work out for them.
Some Christians can’t afford to have children due their work or finances. There are some Christians who have a medical condition or genetic condition which would impact the child and that’s another reason some people choose not to have children .
I also think churches should talk about it fostering or adopting more too. Please don’t get me wrong it’s lonely and exciting when peope have children but not all Christian couples will have children.
I think the issue lies in this - if God told them to have children despite all these things, would they? If not, they’re prioritizing convenience and comfort over a calling on their life. Anyone and everyone can make an excuse about why they shouldn’t have a child right now, can’t have a child right now, are done having kids, etc. But my first statement is something to ponder 🙏🏽
Ligonier ESV study bible is a wonderful resource to have in your arsenal!
As a follower of Jesus Christ my citizenship is in Heaven
@@davesgoldenduck6066 you're free to give up your rights if you like
To say only property owners can vote is horrible. Corporations are buying up all the properties to rent out…
Most Americans rent. Isn't affordable to buy a home.
Allie, you’d support only property owners being allowed to vote? 😳 What about those who rent? Thats 34% of the population who you’d not want to vote? Home ownership is no longer a realistic American Dream for most due to numerous factors. Some of the most hard working Americans aren’t able to purchase homes.
I don’t think Allie Beth has a problem owning a home..
😊 we can communicate with her about it. My husband and I are now in out 40s but still don't own. A few years back we were in the market. But then it got really insane. People from CA who already owned sold their homes and were able to offer way over asking and win all the battles. Now the interest rates are SO HIGH. So we live on my friend's homestead And waiting on the Lord . I'm sure others can share their stories as well. We must trust the Lord . Also, please Christians, let's not make it our idol to have a home, farm or whatever. Keep God in his rightful place.
When you talked about deliverance ministries and how there's a special place in hell for those giving people false promises: this is really a blatant breach of the second commandment. They are abusing the Lord's name, and as it's written "for the LORD will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain". This is the serious meaning of this commandment.
Great episode Allie! One thing....We are a constitutional republic
Allie, I disagree with you that only property owners should have the right to vote. I just don’t understand the reasoning behind that line of thinking. You also didn’t really answer the question should women submit to voting the way their husbands vote. You said “one vote per family,” but that doesn’t answer the question. Personally, I don’t think it’s a biblical matter at all and while wives should submit to their husbands, voting should certainly be a personal choice. Submission can be taken to a silly extreme and voting choice is definitely that extreme. Should we also only listen to the music our husbands listen to or do only the hobbies our husbands like? Some things the Bible just doesn’t speak to and taking a biblical matter like submission to such an extreme can border on cultish. Love your show
She has gotten lazy, she doesn't put much thought into her takes these days
The Holy Spirit convicts and God judges. Not my job. My job to love!
1 Corinthians 5:12-14
But now I have written unto you not to keep company, if any man that is called a brother be a fornicator, or covetous, or an idolator, or a railer, or a drunkard, or an extortioner; with such an one no not to eat.
12 For what have I to do to judge them also that are without? do not ye judge them that are within?
13 But them that are without God judgeth. Therefore put away from among yourselves that wicked person.
There are a lot of different types/kinds of judging that the Bible speaks of.
What is love?
Another important note: the Bible is clear that judgment must first begin in the church, amongst His church. This means edifying in love to one another in the body and allowing God to bring us to conviction and repentance in private.
Yes
@alliebethatuckey someone told me I shouldn’t vote since I don’t understand why campaigns cost hundreds of millions of dollars. Do you agree with that too?
Sort of random- but would love for you to have Justin Peters on your show!
God's Word WILL OFFEND ALL YOUTH
girls---allie is killing it with her make up game lately. she looks so beautiful
I keep wondering if she has a wig on lol why is her hair so nice and thick!! 🤣🫢 I love it. Cutie pie Allie.
How about we link voting to Selective Service registration?
Vote ?
The podcast versus pastoral practice having to do with the preaching of sermons on behalf of God. That is an issue that is important. The sacramental issues are what make a wall of separation around pastor's issues that separate their words from podcast words. Sacraments can't be distributed over the internet, no matter how people would like to make that so for controlling and suffocating the Church on behalf of the Beast of Babylon.
That was a great episode
Excellent podcast👍👌
And I also love the Lord Jesus Christ!
What’s your ethnicity Allie! Swedish? Dutch?
Allie i enjoyed your programs, but I have a little bit of problem with the esv translation because Omitt some Bible verses compared to kjv and some are very important can you help me to understand why plz, thank you for all you do prayer for you and your family
Good answers, Allie! Love your podcast. ❤ May God bless you and your family, and this podcast.
Have you ever heard of Folksandhymns? She plays guitar and sings, and does a great job. Who's your favorite singer?
Women should be able to vote; they are important. It would be awful if babies were frozen forever. They are people. If a dude is in a ladies room, then he needs to get a spanking. Hippo and owl skeletons are scary.
I don't support Trump, but I like Harris less.
Very careful about the submitting to your husband about staying home. It could have good intentions and he wants her to stay home to care for the kids instead of a daycare and he is ready to bare the burden of sole financial responsibility. That’s one possibility. But there are also evil men who want their wives to stay home so that they can have financial control over them and forcibly keep them in an abusive situation. Please be careful with your words. You can be using God to make a woman believe that she needs to stay in an abusive relationship. That is not Godly.
Also, your statement about hormonal birth control is scientifically flawed. Hormonal birth control prevents ovulation from occurring and also thickens the cervix to prevent sperm from passing through. If taken as directed there is no egg to fertilize. Now your statement is correct when speaking about the copper iud. However that is not hormonal birth control. That does prevent an embryo from implanting. But again that is non hormonal. Please make sure you fully understand the science before you influence many women on something that is inherently incorrect.
Unfortunately you're wrong about this. Hormonal birth control fails quite frequently, and in those cases the hormones often prevent implantation which causes an abortion. This isn't new news, it's actually included in the drug facts that come with your birth control pills.
Wisdom would have prevented her from advising submission .
Good points
Allie is speaking from a biblical perspective and the underlying assumption is that this person is married to a Christian man who is following the guidance of the Holy Spirit and understands his role as the leader in his home. The bible clearly says that men need to love their wives as Jesus loves the church. That kind of love is not at all what you are talking about.
@@dana8208 then she needs to clarify that. Many times the Bible is used against women and this is why people is positions of influence need to be careful
If your stance is against homosexuals raising children, if that's your problem with IVF then you should probably start with the adoption system before IVF.
As a single Christian man I have never met a single Christian woman looking for a husband, or in my case I am friend zoned 💯 of the time
Use your time of singleness to seek the Lord. It’s a blessing that you can use this time. Also, reflect on yourself not just what you want in a wife. Are you preparing yourself to be a husband? Or just seeking a wife? Where are you looking for a wife? You will attract someone who is living a similar lifestyle, so think about how that’s been playing out in your life. There are many Christian women seeking to be married. You just haven’t met them yet 🙏🏽
If all the women you meet are rejecting you, it may be you who is the problem, not all the women.
Everything else OK, like even if I don't always agree, I get where things make sense from your perspective, but restricting voting to property owners? My parents were in the military. My first husband was in the military. None of them ever owned property. Ok so say of course military members can vote, regardless. What about me? I wasn't in the military. There are many many good responsible citizens who don't own their homes. They're still contributing to the economyby paying rent. What about people in retirement homes? What about people who live with family, or disabled people? This was kind of a not very well thought out statement. Not only is it elitist but it would also be a giant headache and huge expense to implement. It sounds so British (like 200 years ago). I own my home but I 100% support the voting rights of the renters who live in my neighborhood as long as they are citizens.
❓ Should woman vote well that's stupid question
As a long time agnostic I'm starting to wonder even if I don't believe in God, God believes in me.
God wants your soul to be saved. But YOU have a choice to make 🙏🏽
@@Madreministrythank you, that is a beautiful statement that it took me 55 years to appreciate after hearing it so many times.
I’d love to have an episode from you with someone who knows NFP….id also love to be that person 😂
Disagree on property owner for voting for all of the obvious reasons of needing to poor and vulnerable to be considered as well as having their voices heard plus more and more you don't need to be poor in order to not afford a home. However taxpayers and ID... YES
Some of my closest friends have different beliefs than me.
If they die without Christ as Savior, what will that mean for them?
You do take part I'm some one lying to themselves
What does the Bible say’s? People should take their problems or disapproval of the Bible to God. You want blessings then obey the Word.
After you had Mike ( the charlatan) Gendron on and not holding him accountable for the bull he was spewing about the Catholic faith , you showed me and many many others that you’re limited.
Catholicism is a false religion. Repent and believe in the Lord Jesus Christ and His finished work on the cross
Not just the 19th. We need to be much closer to where the Founders started. Every person being able to vote to take things from other people is a disaster.
Stay at home, open womb, And many other things. Frankly, that's something that should be talked about before you put rings on your finger. I would also like to say that.Yeah, a woman should vote. If a woman ask me directions to the voting place if I know she's a leftist, I would probably give her the wrong directions.
I wish my husband wanted me to be a stay at home wife 😂
A girl can dream….
Birds are dinosaurs
All categorization is a manmade system from Adam on.
I eat dinosaur all the time
Birds aren't real.
@@Momofukudoodoowindu I have personally seen a bird before
With freedom come responsible so teach how to save money.
Property owner to vote? Wow. Im glad you have had a privileged life.
I’m sorry, but telling girls that they don’t have to be nice to trans people? 🧐 And that they should ignore them? That does not sound Christ-like to me. Dehumanizing people you disagree with, especially when they are children, is doing so much damage to Christians’ witness.
Maybe if they faced more rejection they would think it twice before adopting that lifestyle
@@wendymtzc It is not our responsibility to bully people out of their gender dysphoria. With attitudes like this so prevalent, it is little wonder more and more people are leaving their churches.
@@noelleleader6212 you don’t want that kind of people at church anyways, please read Romans 1 and see for yourself why they embrace that lifestyle and what God thinks about it
Niceness isn’t a fruit of the spirit
@@kamarwashington Kindness is. Love is. Peace is. Goodness is. Gentleness is. Is it any wonder that more Americans are eschewing Christianity when Christians are openly rationalizing away showing the same love to others that Christ shows to us? How can we both proclaim the transformative power of the Gospel and then refuse to transform how we treat others we disagree with? I weep for the non-believers who will read these types of comments and see their worst suspicions confirmed about what Christians are actually like. 😢
Unless they were in school it's free if not you pay rent it help you prepare for the real world
What do you think of John Piper's view that women should not be in leadership that is both personal and directive over men in the workplace?
He’s on crack.
I like nature family planing God gave you the wisdom to plan your family.
Never put no one before your God so tell the truth your God want me to tell you the truth
Suggest this hostess learn about Natural Family Planning (NFP) as taught by tge Catholic Church as part of education to young women and engaged and married couples. The topic is treated with respect and dignity of married couples as persons worthy of relational pepple with important roles in life..
You are not a Christian when you pick and choose what you want to follow or not follow. Jesus said you love me by keeping my commandments! 2 Timothy 3:16 All scripture is God breathed! That you must follow. Obediance is greater than sacrifice. King Saul found out the hard way
The first commandment God give to men was to be fruitful and multiply.