Це відео не доступне.
Перепрошуємо.
Are Intel Arc GPUs Good? Arc A750 vs 1080p & 1440p
Вставка
- Опубліковано 19 гру 2023
- SPONSOR: GVGMALL Christmas Sale 25% off code: YAM
Windows 11 Pro ($23): gvgmall.com/gv...
Windows 10 Pro ($16): gvgmall.com/gv...
Windows 11 Home ($21): gvgmall.com/gv...
Windows 10 Home ($14): gvgmall.com/gv...
Office 2016 Pro Plus ($27): gvgmall.com/gv...
Office 2019 Pro Plus ($49): gvgmall.com/gv...
#GVGMALL#Windows11#Christmas
Intel Arc graphics cards have been on the market for more than a year. How does the Arc A750 fare in gaming after 1 year of driver improvements? Let's see its 1080p and 1440p gaming performance!
Testing System Specs:
i5 12400F: amzn.to/45MZ2wj
Noctua NH-U12S: amzn.to/3RXY8cM
32GB 3200MHz DDR4: amzn.to/3qJIEhs
MSI Pro B660M-A (DDR4): amzn.to/45q5Cck
1TB Sabrent Gen 3 NVMe: amzn.to/3qJIEhs
Corsair RM850e (better alternative to my PSU): amzn.to/45usreZ
DeepCool CC360 ARGB: amzn.to/4anzM34
Links to my socials:
TikTok: / proyamyampc
Twitter: / proyamyampc
Instagram: / proyamyampc
Background music:
Streambeats by Harris Heller: www.streambeat...
Editing PC Specs:
Intel Core i7 13700K: amzn.to/3KNfhBn
Thermalright Contact Frame (LGA 1700): amzn.to/3sKjkZs
RTX 4070 (newer alternative to my RTX 3080): amzn.to/3QSYrVA
Patriot Viper 32GB DDR5: amzn.to/3qIhRlm
MSI Z790 Gaming Pro (newer alternative): amzn.to/3E4FTu3
Samsung 980 Pro 1TB: amzn.to/3E723vL
Be quiet! Straight Power 12: amzn.to/4apLY37
NZXT H7 Flow (better alternative for my H700): amzn.to/47Bt6g5
Corsair H150i 360mm AIO: amzn.to/3KNh5dS
My Video Gear:
Camera body (Sony A7 IV): amzn.to/49C3Jf8
Main lens (Sigma 24-70 f2.8): amzn.to/45gieCW
Photo lens (Sony FE 50mm f1.8): amzn.to/3GbpJ31
Audio Gear:
Main mic (DJI Wireless Mic): amzn.to/47rGpiM
Lav mic: amzn.to/3sUcl05
My PC mic: amzn.to/40WRvtO
Recording accessories:
Ring light: amzn.to/3EgWbRb
Camera cage (for A7 IV/A7S III): amzn.to/3upivWG
RGB video light: amzn.to/41gIdIX
DISCLAIMER: All Amazon links are affiliate links. This means that if you purchase a product via these links, I will make a small commission. This is at no extra cost to you.
If you would like to kindly support the channel, purchasing gear through these links or even leaving a Super Thanks helps out massively!
Great review! I hope Intel keeps releasing GPUs and develop their tech. Having a 3rd player on the GPU world is great for us the consumers
Thank you mate! If Intel keeps at it (and it looks like they are), it's a massive win for the GPU market as a whole!
@@ProYamYamPCAwesome review! Thanks for pointing out it need PCI-E 4.0. I acually just have 3.0 on this mb so thats a deal breaker. But to be honest im running the old but gold i7 3770K CPU and not really gaming alot on pc nowadays, and my EVGA GTX 770 just died. Will just use the intels iGpu to power the monitor & save bucks for an upcoming PS5 Pro instead. As a gfx card in a console never died on me. But the ones on pc does! My philosophy anyways! 😉
I waded into the shallow end of the Arc pool - my secondary gaming PC is always experimental, and unlike my wife, is where I usually game. It's current iteration is the a380 paired with a Pentium g7400. I didn't skimp on the other parts, as it is meant to upgrade - so it has good DDR5 Ram and high speed SSD/NVME capabilities. I'm also using a business class motherboard, for durability and because I really, really like the sleeper aesthetic of green motherboards...
It is solid, not great, not an insane machine by any stretch - but it is (mostly) stable and consistent. I can vouch that the Arc cards work with CRTs with an adapter, BTW (it's a sleeper build, with a sleepy modern layout, LOL).
I'm starting to seriously consider upgrading my RX6600 to a higher end Arc card, maybe waiting for BattleMage... I am wholeheartedly backing Intel as the underdog here because I am very tired of the duopoly - and very, very concerned about Nvidia and their goals going forward...
All the reviews on UA-cam have generally been very positive. I think the market needed another big name to try and keep prices grounded. Also intel seem to be aiming their GPU at the lower to mid tear GPU market.
I think Intel are doing all of the right things. They're constantly pushing drivers out for Arc cards. I think targeting the low to mid tier for now is the smartest option, until their drivers are rock solid.
Intel hasn't even figured out efficiency on their _CPUs._ Fixing their GPU efficiency would be a case of misplaced priorities when the thing they're _known_ for is even worse
To be fair you have a point. And I should know as I have a 13700K in my main PC😂
Even if it's more inefficient, most people would still buy Intel/Nvidia over AMD/AMD
You buy AMD you find out bruh, I've done the same mistake and guess what I'm back to Intel
hes full of crap a 13700k is well worth it over any amd chip, ever. @@ProYamYamPC
Great video! I have an ARC770 16GB LE (beautiful card and RGB) on my daily PC, which I use for editing, work, CS2, DOTA, etc. No issues and driver updates are very often. For older WinXP gaming, my i7 3770 + Quadro K620 2GB + Audigy2 are still fun. 🤗👽
do you edit photogrphy 4k video editing? or streams? how is it doing?
am interested in one of these
Great review!
The use case for these cards is a little better in the US, since it is significantly cheaper, hovering between $180 and $220 (£145-£175)
GPUs in the UK cost more than the GPUs in the US
Interesting how the A750 keeps being bottlecked by 1080p. This is a 1440p card and does not scale like the competition.
I got my A750 for what now is equall to £156 and that includes 25% VAT, and it pairs well with my Ryzen 5600.
I'm not an Arc shill or anything and I own a RTX3080, but it does slightly annoy me when reviewers mention resizable bar support with a negative slant, I know Arcs price category could attract users of older systems, but Intel have to draw a line in the sand somewhere to start development from. They probably just started with current technology standards, which includes having the full address space of the video card memory available to the CPU, this has been a thing for the last 6 years even some 200 series boards have it; a bit extreme but its kind of like me complaining complaining my 3080 isn't performing great on and a core 2 duo with PCIE Gen 1.
Warning, Bro Science: It could be said its partly the Intel CPU departments fault, for stagnating the processor market for a number of years until Ryzen got decent, this probably had negative ramifications across the game development space, and it might of been that no one would even consider using a 8 year old processor as it would just old for games today, but you reap what you sow I guess!
I got one of these for £179.99 last month and I really like it. I just wish The Last of Us ran better on Arc cards - if so, I'd be over the moon as that's such a low price for a good amount of power
Thanks. Without RB you can expect a ~40% drop in performances (gaming). Another good thing is taking advantage of the deeplink, having the intel integrated graphics card (if you don't have a "F" CPU of course) working together with the GPU. Another thing to take into account is its wide bus (256 bit) which has no competitor in the same price range, and this makes this card an excellent budget option for content creation and productivity programs, outside the gaming activities (excluding Adobe After Effects and 3d professional renderings where nVidia still has no rivals).
ps: for those who aren't scared about some minimal "hacking", games running on old directX 11 and 9 can take a significant boost by using the Vulkan DLLs installed in the game directory, above all with a great corrective effect on the lowest 1% and 0.1% values of fps.
Appreciate your adding ARC content to the channel. 👍
Testing with an old platform that doesn't support rebar is going to be a trainwreck. Frame pacing will be horrific depending on the title. And as you are discovering, CPU driver overhead is even higher than Nvidia's. But hey, it's for science so have fun and try not to cringe too hard.
Hardware XeSS is quite good, considerably better than FSR, you should test it. It would have changed your 1440p experience in Cyberpunk for the better. Witcher 3 as well.
You didn't provide any context for why you consider God of War performance poor. Compared to what? It'll spank the more expensive RTX 3050. It can hang with the other under $200 option here in the U.S. the RX 6600, and I think it's actually faster at 1440p using DXVK. Here in the U.S. you can get various A750 models for as little as $180 and it's bundled with Assassins Creed Mirage and another game.
It's your first content with ARC, and this is meant as a constructive critique. So...now you have done the basic - is it for casuals? content. Time to dig deeper homie. Because if you want to give ARC a fair shake? You have to test the hardware upscaling and test out what happens when you drop the DXVK files into the game folder of underperforming DX11 titles.
I have the same A750 LE, and an ASRock Challenger A380 I like to mess around with. I tell everyone ARC is the box of chocolates; you never know what you're gonna get.
Thank you for the tips mate! You've given me a lot of content to think about. I also totally forgot about the DXVK for older DirectX API games lol. I'm also looking to source some similarly priced GPUs (RX 6600/XT, etc.) to compare against the Arc A750 too.
But as always mate, thank you for pointing this out to me!
Fancied trying one for a while but will wait for their next gen and maybe grab one for testing next year. Good to have a third player in the mainstream dGPU market.
Fairs mate. I saw this one on eBay so I thought I'd get it to see what they're like and for the content too. Lots more planned with this one!
Make sure your PC supports rebar. I had to order a ryzen 5600 because the 2600 doesn’t support it. This card is useless without rebar.
With Arc you definitely need a beefy CPU to brute force some of the CPU overhead in the drivers. I have an A770 LE with a 12700K and have very few issues, although i enjoy messing around and troubleshooting it. I also wouldn't recommend Arc for anyone who just wants plug and play with all games
for price which are lower then those Nvidia utter shit rtx 3050 seems that Arc are pretty fine gpu
The Arc A750 is incredibly underrated. I’ve used it a lot more since this review and it only gets better.
Awesome review! Thanks for pointing out it need PCI-E 4.0. I acually just have 3.0 on this mb so thats a deal breaker. But to be honest im running the old but gold i7 3770K CPU and not really gaming alot on pc nowadays, and my EVGA GTX 770 just died. Will save bucks for an upcoming PS5 Pro instead. As a gfx card in a console never died on me. But the ones on pc does! My philosophy anyways! 😉
Good work bro
please do medium,high and other balanced settings benchmarks for 1440p
Nice bro great job
Yo so i have a i3 9100f and was looking for a GPU upgrade from gtx 1650 should i go for this gpu as it only has 20% bottleneck where as the alternative like rtx 3050 or rx 6600 have 35-40% bottleneck
I need for after effects and medium 1080p gaming of new gen games any suggestions? On what should i do?
20% not soo bad I think you can research on it
@@Arijit_ i ended up deciding to get a 5600 amd processor and a new mobo and save the gpu for later cus if i am buying stuff might as well get long term
You don't need pcie gen 4. I run a ryzen 5800x in a x370 motherboard and my a770 16gig runs fine with no issue
Pcie gen 4 just makes the CPU and GPU and SSD run faster, you can still play games with pcie 3 but your capping your performance because of it. Also the 5800x is a very good CPU, I have a 5800x with a 4080 and I get 140fps+ in games at 1440p high settings
@@AssassinIsAfk I agree with you. I don't think the a770 is powerful enough to be handicapped by pcie gen 3. Now your 4080 will definitely be handicapped by pcie gen 3.
@@bryanwages3518 well yes until you hit 4k lol, 4k is handicapped by any CPU
Rebar is a must. idk about gen 4 though im running gen 3 with a ryzen 5 5500 rebar on and getting better fps than this benchmark.
Hi bro, what about power consumption ?
2:05 6 Gb ?
My bad, that slipped past my QC. No idea why I put 6GB😅
Hi! Do you know a probable release date for the battlemage GPU's?
I'm not too sure, but it's looking likely it will be at some point this year
Why did you not enable up scaling in Cyberpunk2077? These cards are Upscale cards just like the RTX 4060
I don’t test with upscaling. And even then, RT is not worth it on a card like this.
@@ProYamYamPC I use part path tracing and Ray tracing between 35 and 60 fps with xess on performance without fsr3 which would be higher in fact fsr2.1 equates a few more frames than xess at the expense of slightly less visual fidelity or clarity on performance 🫤 I have to completely disagree tbh btw name a card that can do all that for $200 😑 that’s also without fsr3 and ray reconstruction etc can be enabled which is what I do with mods
I wish to use the ARC 750 graphics card for a setup involving three 4K monitors (3840X2160) for a trading PC. I do not intend to use it for gaming. Will it work okay with my i5 14500 processor and MSI Pro B760M A DDR5 motherboard? I also plan to add another 4K monitor later. Will this graphics card be able to handle that without any problems? My alternative options are the NVIDIA T600 graphics card or a T1000. For comparison, I am getting them at the following prices in India - ARC750 8GB at INR 21199; T1000 4GB at INR 24900; T1000 8GB at INR 30600. I do not wish to spend more money than necessary to run my setup. Since it is the cheapest option, I would really appreciate some recommendations.
I find this hard to recommend over an RX 6600 which is $200 here in the US.
The 750 has nearly 50% more raytracing power, and the 6600 sees no land even in most rasterization titles. (s. Game Star Test)
RX6600 loses 10% when on PCIE 3.0, the A750 doesn't and traces rays much better.
@@magnusnilsson9792 That's not really an issue since every PC today uses 4.0.
Ray tracing is better, but still not great. You aren't going to be using it on the latest games.
Driver support is the main reason to go with AMD though.
@@chase7974 Mine only uses PCIE 3.0, due to a B350 MoBo, I don't want to spend $80 on a B550 and migrate for PCIE 4.0 alone.
I agree raytracing is useless before getting to 4k 60fps.
Driver support, sure Intel is not going to optimize non e-sport games already running okay at 60FPS, but regarding blackscreens and graphical bugs AMD nor Nvidia is not any better.
If you need DOSBox to work stay away from the Intel Arc cards. DOSBox quite working with Arc GPU's after driver 4676 almost 4 months ago, and Intel doesn't seem to want to fix it for some strange reason?
for me it good but i will pick 4060 for stability and low power consumption
That's fair enough. The 4060 is an extremely efficient card. Rock solid stable too.
Nigga, are you for real? 4060 is like 300$ and a750 is a sub 200$
Power consumption can be reduced drastically by outputting video over the motherboard. Lowering the clock and Powertarget of the A750 to 130-150W makes it only 20% slower, but 40% less power hungry.
You went for the 8GB version of the card? Silly cheapskate.
The A750 only comes with 8GB?
Was referring to the A770, mate! 8GB being sufficient is ancient history at this point, even with XeSS support which soon won't even be enough.@@ProYamYamPC
@@ProYamYamPCHe's thinking of the A770