Is this Why the Universe Makes No Sense At All?
Вставка
- Опубліковано 2 лип 2024
- Join Territory to get access to perks:
/ @territoryspace
For more than twenty years, physicists and astronomers have been trying to create a mathematical model that explains the apparent inconsistencies of the theory of general relativity.
Now, a new theory proposes some major tweaks to Albert Einstein's General Theory of Relativity, by measuring for the inconsistencies observed in gravity when the universe is observed from vast distances.
Scientists are calling this inconsistency in Relativity 'a cosmic glitch' where gravity becomes around one percent weaker when dealing with distances in the billions of light years.
This cosmic glitch model modifies and extends Einstein's mathematical formulas in a way that resolves the inconsistency of some of the cosmological measurements without affecting existing successful uses of general relativity.
Subscribe to take a deep dive into the unknown with Territory - / @territoryspace
Instagram - territoryspace - Наука та технологія
Dark matter and dark energy is the scientific equivalent of the punch-line, "And then a miracle happened".
Without a doubt, "dark matter" and "dark energy" are there to just fix some other misunderstanding... I don't have a scientific explanation to throw here, only: they just don't make any sense. Whatever they're trying to explain, is almost certainly caused by something else - wrong numbers from some measurements or something similiar. Neither one has ever been detected, because the reason they "exist" is imagination. There's some error somewhere else, something has been misunderstood.
The Hubble tension and the discovery by the JWT of large galaxies in the very early universe are two substantial problems in cosmology today. The Hubble constant measurements from CMB analysis and from Type 1A supernovae analysis are so precise that they suggest perhaps a fundamental assumption is incorrect. One assumption is that time has elapsed at a rate of 1 sec/sec since the beginning. Is it possible that time and space are related in such a way that, as space expands, time elapses at a slower rate? Like the person in an elevator who cannot distinguish between sitting still on the ground and being accelerated at 1 g by a rocket ship in outer space, we cannot distinguish between space expanding and time elapsing at a slower rate. If at some point in the future it takes longer to go from point A to point B, relative to today, it could be because space has expanded and there is farther to go, or because time has slowed down, or both. If space was not expanding but time was elapsing more slowly over eons then a photon released billions of years ago and detected today would, like an audio recording played at a slower speed, seem to have a lower frequency, or be red shifted. This could affect late universe measurements of the Hubble constant because these are based on analyzing the red shift of photons released billions of years ago. Part of the red shift could be due to a reduction in the rate at which time is elapsing between when they were generated and the present and space might not be expanding as fast as thought. Also, when the universe was smaller, time could have been elapsing at a greater rate and the universe could actually be much, much older than 13.8 billion years. This would allow enough time for the formation of very large galaxies sooner than is thought possible. Now this is just a thought from a retired biologist. Maybe someone else can do the math.
Considering that no one has ever shown conclusively the existence of dark matter maybe we should be looking elsewhere. It was conceived as a theory to explain certain aspects of the universe, but doesn't seem to answer a lot of questions and seems to beg more. So maybe it doesn't exist and it, as a theory, is just impeding other explanations that may help us better understand the nature of the universe.
Just as even Einstein was skeptical about quantum mechanics, because it was so different from the physics of things on a familiar scale, I can't help but wonder if there is another category of physics, yet to be deciphered, that deals with things on a very, very large scale. Is the Doppler effect we seem to see in far-away stars and galaxies real? Does what seems to be Doppler effect really mean those objects are moving away, and even accelerating away, or is there something different at work affecting the wavelength of light reaching us? I may sound stupid to a cosmologist, but even Einstein did not foresee quantum mechanics. If the universe is not expanding, don't a lot of mysteries go away, like dark matter, dark energy and the mystery of the expansion accelerating, rather than slowing, as you might expect? Sorry if I'm just naive.
Chaos. The nature of the universe is chaos.
If we applied math to humans we would all be identical. You can not look at life from the logic we are using. There is another layer of life inside of us. Why are we not inside of more life? It explains a lot. And... we all know that life is imperfect. The math must account for this.
Tired light destroys dark energy
As photon ages it undergoes a red shift. If this is true then the universe isn't speeding up.
I'm not entirely sure that the universe could be said to have made 'sense' at any point in our scientific understanding. It's bit like being able to understand how a car mechanically works, but without understanding the concept of communication, or the structure of motorways, or even how nice it is to have a new car. There are clearly some major things going on, that are far more massive than galaxies sprinting off into infinite space
The only thing that is fundamentally wrong is the assumption that the gravitational constant G never varied in time. According to M-theory, there was originally one 11-d space-time in which the 10th dimension of space was a circle. Then it straightened into a line segment with a 10-d space-time sheet at each end of the segment, with a gap that determined the strength of gravity. Each sheet contained either dark matter (E8-singlet sector of E8xE8') or ordinary matter (E8'-singlet sector of E8xE8'). The two sheets moved apart, weakening the force of gravity over time, so that galaxies formed quickly at first, then more and more slowly as G decreased to its value measured in the lab. This explains why galaxies have been seen by James Webb Telescope that are too large and complex to have been formed for their age - the much stronger force of gravity initiated gravitational condensation and nucleosynthesis much more quickly near the beginning of the universe.
@@stephenphillips4984 Or…. or it could be because our science is wrong and “science advances one funeral at the time”.
Very nice theme "Territory", one of your best topics!
Everything is fine in our universe, only our human perspective is wrong.
According to quantum mechanical processes, everything around us and of course in the cosmos is moving, everything is constantly in motion and this means even more: without movement there is no evolution and development!
And our entire universe is subject to these processes and this also explains the constantly changing shape of our gigantic cosmos.
We have been talking about the Big Bang for 50 years and have been wrong for 50 y.!
Welcome to the reality of the cyclically self-renewing universe, welcome to the logical evolution and natural consciousness of the cosmos...
The Vatican Observatory's Fr. Georges Lemaître proposed the Big Bang Theory. Have they published anything about these tensions in Cosmology?
Is mass the only source of gravity? What if the collapsed timespace around a black hole stretches a sphere of timespace many times the size of the Milky Way ? In the sphere a quasi gravity that is uniform in distribution would eliminate dark matter.
The Big Bang was a joke by Fred Hoyle.
We can figure out the cosmos but we can't lower the price of a can of chunky can of soup. Today it cost $3.67 a can. Common Canada do better
We can't figure out the cosmos... or who knows - maybe this mysterious "dark force" is indeed real, and endlessly keeps on expanding prices aswell, as it expands the whole universe...
Was no big bang
Ok professor…
The term " Big Bang" is really misleading for sure.
Explain then the cosmic background microwave radiation? Can't? Thought so. Back to the Big Bang.
To see a Univers back în Time i e distorted from presence, to not aply quantum correlation at all scales, space Time îs a quantum structure of objects which carry all fields, something that is quantum ether like, a suport medium for fields, worm holes, superior dimensions that exchange Information and energy with our phisical world, to many things unknow.
The clumpiness is more at large distances. So we are facing our big crunch. Acc to Q.FFF THEORY.
Relax bro
Wtf are you taking the universe makes no sense at all? Stupid clock bait?
It makes very much sense!
Also, the sites galaxies move away each other due to expansion is NOT limited by the sites of light.
Make your homework before creating a video about stuff you don't understand.
First!
First is the new last