9 Regression as an Orthogonal Projection

Поділитися
Вставка

КОМЕНТАРІ • 8

  • @chiarasacchetti8284
    @chiarasacchetti8284 2 місяці тому

    This video saved my life

  • @AlphansoEric
    @AlphansoEric Рік тому +4

    That's amazing video, Beautiful explanation of linear regression in terms of linear algebra.

  • @MrOndra31
    @MrOndra31 Рік тому +2

    Great content! This was the missing link between my linear algebra and econometrics courses :D

  • @asifzahir7512
    @asifzahir7512 Рік тому

    Amazing! cleared lots of confusions

  • @breathemath4757
    @breathemath4757 Рік тому

    This is just way too good. Thanks a lot!

  • @antonlinares2866
    @antonlinares2866 8 місяців тому

    Thank you so much, you made algebra and linear regression click for me

  • @teklehaimanotaman3150
    @teklehaimanotaman3150 Рік тому

    Very amazing lecture! thank you very much for your efforts. Is the line from the origin to the point y_hat the regression line please?

  • @sum1sw
    @sum1sw 9 місяців тому

    I'm not sure this is what I am looking for, if it is, then I missed it. I have an implicit function f(x,y,z)=0 (it is actually a model with adjustable parameters). I have an experimental data point (Xexp, Yexp, Zexp). You can probably see where I am heading with this. I want to know where a line, orthogonal/perpendicular to the surface, will intersect the surface. I'm calling this point of intersection Xcalc, Ycalc, Zcalc. How do I proceed?
    Based on other videos I watched, it looks like the first step is to linearize the surface using Taylor series. So, now I have a plane (in terms of partial derivatives and (Xcalc, Ycalc, Zcalc) which is still unknown. I want to know the point of intersection (Xcalc, Ycalc, Zcalc) of the orthogonal line from Xexp, Yexp, Zexp.
    At first, I thought is it a trial an error iterative procedure (I have to guess Xcalc, Ycalc, Zcalc) so I programmed that, but the answers I am getting do not seem to be correct. I'm also beginning to suspect that the solution can be direct, not iterative.
    Any thoughts?