God's word is never wrong. This is absolutely fascinating to learn about! EVERYTHING in this video makes so much sense. So glad God led me to your video!
Until you look at the evidence of why the temple was NOT in the "city of David" proper, as we know it today.. ... David bought the ground that was the threshing floor of Joash .. Threshing floors would NEVER be placed near, over, on our around a spring... it would severely contaminate the water ... Solomon built the temple on the ground David purchased. Which was up on Mt. Moriah .. He then built an aqueduct system six miles like from Hebron by Bethlehem that went to giant cisterns under the temple. Those are still evident today. And they do not branch off into the city. They go straight to the cisterns under the temple mount... The reservoirs that the water was taken from are still there to this day, and very full all the time... The water coming from Hebron was under hydrostatic pressure and flowed downhill into the cisterns. The water from the Gihon spring would have had to be pumped up into the temple to wash away the massive blood from the sacrifice ... This is just one obvious reason that the temple was not in the place this video supposed.. There are a thousand reasons more..
I always found that interesting because the Bible said there shall not be one stone upon another and yet they go pray at a whole wall. I was watching a Jewish man walking the wall a few years ago talking about it being the temple and i just kept thinking, that doesn't make sense. The Bible is nothing if not perfectly literal and if God says no stone upon another, than I'm pretty sure there isn't going to be a whole section of wall. Great video!
@@ryankilgore6647 it’s not even that… what you call the retaining wall is the retaining wall of the Roman Fortress…. The Word also days we will plow the field where the temple once stood. Go and look up old pictures and see for yourself.
"Great is the Lord, and greatly to be praised in the City of our God, in the mountain of His Holiness. BEAUTIFUL FOR SITUATION, the joy of the whole earth, is Mt. Zion on the sides of the north, the City of the great King. I have loved this song for 37 years and now discover why!!!!!
Bob Cornuke. I just talked with Dave. He had such a wonderful time with you this past week. He was so impressed with you. He spoke very highly. I agree with what you’ve said here. Hope that some day we can visit and talk about these things. Good luck and God a less and protect you and yours.
What Cornuke is stating is NOT the truth. He builds is claims on that of Earnest Martin and both men are wrong. They have misquoted the Bible,, historians and ignored archaeological evidence. Do your own research into the subject starting with Biblical truth. You can also watch Derek Walker and Michael Rood on the subject for clarification.
@Elaine Kilgore The "renown biblical archaeologists" that the revisionists rely upon to assert such drivel (Ernst Martin was a meteorologist who knew nothing about academic archeology and the same goes for Robert Cornuke) clearly have not studied Charles Warren, Eilat Mazar, Conrad Schick, Barclay and Willson. Dr. Martin's theory was disproved by the experts already in the early 1990's. The Giḥon spring only fed the residents' needs for water. Conversely, multiple cisterns and water sources are found on the Temple Mount. The Temple Mount has over 20 cisterns and conduits which were plenty of water for the services (I have seen for myself their capped openings on Har haBayit) . One cistern could hold over 2 million gallons and another around 700,000 gallons. This is verified history.On top of this, Jewish records show that there was an aqueduct that brought water in abundance to the Temple Mt. from the Pools of Solomon at Etan near Bethlehem (not to be confused with the aqueduct that Pilot later built). Cornuke and his ilk really do not know what they are talking about. The building of the Ophel south of the wall was actually the Akra which was built by Antiochus IV and destroyed by Shimon the Macabee. The City of David is not wide enough to place the 740 x 740 feet that made the 500 x 500 cubits of Temple Mt. Bad scholarship by these people using Ernest Martin's book which was discredited a while back. Ernest Martin is not a credible resource but Dr Benjamin Mazar, Dr. Eilat Mazar, Captain Charles Warren, Conrad Schick, Lee Ritmeyer and others are, and they all agree Mt. Moriah is the Temple Mount. By the way, the Fort of Antonia was around 40 cubits high on a high ground. The 10th legion only came to Jerusalem after the siege of Jerusalem and a cohort is 500-600 soldiers. According to Josephus the Antonia fortress was razed to the ground by the Romans in order to access the Temple Mt during the destruction of the 2nd Temple. This is only one of many points that I can give to why Dr. Martin's theory can not hold water and why Bob Cornuke is fooling thousands of gullible people who do not know any better. The headquarters for the Roman soldiers was in Caesarea by the sea. The Antonia was not new, it was a fort that was constructed by Solomon and then rebuilt by Nehemia and called the Baris. Herod later expanded the area by filling in the fosse found on the north of the Temple and it was according to Josephus 60 feet deep and 250 wide as protection for the Temple from the north. Herod filled it up and expanded beyond the 500 cubits starting from the offset stone called the Persian stone from Nehemia's time. The experts of the City of David excavations and around the Temple Mt., who work daily to reveal the history of ancient Jerusalem, have found nothing to date that suggests the Temple Mt. was the Antonia fortress. Anyway, Herod expanded to the north, west and south and those are retaining walls which were not part of the biblical measurements. By the way, no credible recognized archeologist says the Temple was south of the Temple Mount. For example, all these archaeologists from the 1800's and 1900's who had access to the site said the same thing about the Temple being on the Temple Mt.: DeVougue 1864, Ferguson 1878, Warren 1880, Conder 1884, Schick 1896, Watson 1896, Mommert 1903, Dalman 1909, Hollis 1934, Simons 1952, Vincent 1954, Ritmeyer 1985. And Josephus must be studied in unity with the Mishnah, Tosefta and the works of Conrad Schick topographical work of the Temple Mount. Josephus whom Martin and Cornuke both falsely quote, never said the Temple was in the city of David nor did he ever say an entire legion of Roman soldiers and their hangers on was permanently living in Jerusalem. He used the word "Tema" which means a lesser amount. Cornuke also doctors excerpts from the Jewish Bible so that they fit the claims he attempts to hawk. He has even lied that Israeli archaeologist Eli Shoukrun claimed that the Holy Temples stood in the City of David, whereas Shoukrun insists on the traditional site's location. The Jewish tradition about the Temple Mount's location boasts anecdotal contiguity since the early AD 70's. Evidently, Josephus was aware of Jews who had begun returning daily to the Mount a mere 2-3 days after the Holy Temple had been sacked. This presence continues among others through early rabbis who ascended to it and was punctuated only for a few years in the Bar-Kokhvah revolt of 132-135 AD until the Byzantine era, when Jews were permitted to go there only one day a year. It is then, intriguingly, in the 4th century, that two gentile authors attest to this Jewish presence and note how the Jews would come up to the giant Foundation Stone and brush it with oil. Daily Jewish presence is renewed during the Persian occupation of the early 7th century and shortly afterward with the Arab Muslim occupation of 638, a presence that was pretty uninterrupted until the First Crusade of 1099. To even suggest we Jews are so dumb that we managed to forget our holiest site along the way since the AD70 Destruction is preposterous and offensive; and utterly arrogant when stated by non-Jews. So this tradition is rock solid, and none of the Christians who attempt to defy it can provide convincing answers that bear scrutiny to the question of when the Jews forgot the supposed original site.
Aquila one day he will be with us in the New Jereslem and will be our ruler and King David will be our shepherd.belive the and the will be peace all the time there will be not haters and racists lier, theft, I could go on but only the rightous will be there believe that.
He dwell in our hearts now if we are truly bornagain believers but one day God is going to dwell in the New Jereslem we all sinners are destroyed form this land.. didn't you know that there will be one big happy family of all races and colors and greeds no more war, fighting, killing, it will be peace, peace, for ever more all bad people's will be in the lake of 🔥 for ever ever more. Believe that.
Its so obvious that the temple mount used to be Fortress Antionia,if you have seen one Roman Castrum you have seem them all,they are all built to the same specs.
"We go by our traditions" they say. ...nothing hath changed since the days Messiah walked that land and were rejected by the religious crowd. Sad to see. ...but it is just how it has always been. God alone can put an end to that. And He shall. ......soon I believe. Oh happy day.
@Becky Evans But the deity in your religion is firstly "God the Father", which all Christians, except for you, insist is the same Father/God the Jews worship. This means you insist that your coreligionists believe in a divine liar. People expressing your kind of view cannot be taken seriously in the least, if they are Christian. This is why we dismiss you as a l-u-n-a-t-i-c.
Bert Graef because we know from Paul’s writings that God is not done with Israel, we, were grafted into their broken branches, but they are still to be honored for Salvation is of the Jews even as Jesus was a Jew (not the religion but the blood line). That’s why.
Psalm 2 where God says I have installed my King on Zion, my holy hill. Keyword Zion! Thank you very much for sharing and God Bless All. Take care kiddos:)
Claudio I don't understand why you have no time for her just because she no she wasn't a Jew because if you go to Heaven you all will be together there why not get a lone now it won't be no bull crap in Heaven that's for sure haha
Don’t be fooled. The “tradition” you refer to is fully supported by the Bible. This film is using part of Scripture, not all. The total of Scripture actually shows Mr. Cornuke to be badly misled.
Moses had horns in the early bibel translations. Not anymore, but in the same chapter the 2 altars still have Horn. Now moses has Sun rays in his face , and the two altars should also have the translation :Ray.. The altar for the sun has sun ray , the moon altar has moon ray. It all fits. ua-cam.com/video/KjaUt5vU0-w/v-deo.html
SHANAYA STAR , YOU ARE THE IGNORANT ONE !! THE ONE * LORD ALMIGHTY * GOD YAHWEH , THE * LORD YESHUA / JESUS * CHRIST / THE * SON OF * GOD / THE * SON OF THE MOST HIGH / THE * HOLY SPIRIT ( THE HOLY , DIVINE , RIGHTEOUS , MAJESTIC ( GODHEAD ) THE SCRIPTURES --- THE WRITTEN * WORD OF * GOD !! FOR HE * CHRIST IS THE * WORD OF * GOD IN THE FLESH / HUMAN --- YET WITHOUT SIN !! ---- THE * LORD SPOKE THROUGH HIS PROPHETS OF OLD & IN THESE LAST DAYS HAS SPOKEN THROUGH HIS * SON YESHUA / JESUS -- THE * CHRIST / THE * FATHER'S ANOINTED ONE !! YES , THE SCRIPTURES WERE NOT WRITTEN BY MAN'S WISDOM , WILL OR INTELLECT BUT BY THE WILL OF THE * LORD !! --- READ / SEE THE OLD TESTAMENT PROPHECIES AS RE. THE * LORD & HIS FIRST COMING INTO THIS FALLEN SINFUL WORLD TO SAVE SINNERS FROM ETERNAL DEATH , FORGIVENESS OF YOUR , MY , OUR SINS !! ---- YES , THE SINLESS * SON OF * GOD WENT TO THE CROSS / TREE AT CALVARY / GOLGOTHA / THE SHEDDING OF HIS PRECIOUS BLOOD FOR YOU , ME , US ---- ALL MANKIND !! 1 CORINTHIANS 15 VS. 1 ------ 4 -------- YES , PROPHECIES AS RE. HIS SUFFERING ON THE CROSS / TREE !! ISAIAH 53 , THE PSALMS . FORTOLD ONE THOUSAND YEARS BEFORE CRUCIFIXION WAS KNOWN & USED AS PUNISHMENT !! -- YES , THERE IS NO OTHER NAME GIVEN UNDER HEAVEN WHEREBY WE MUST BE SAVED !! ACTS 4 V.12. ---- TURN FROM YOUR SIN OF UNBELIEF -- A CHANGE OF MIND ?! -- TURN AWAY FROM WHATEVER THAT YOU HAVE PUT YOUR HOPE & TRUST IN - YOUR IDOLATRY / IDOLS & TURN TO THE * LORD YESHUA / JESUS * CHRIST & RECEIVE HIM INTO YOUR LIFE / LIVES AS YOUR * LORD & * SAVIOUR -- THUS BE SAVED FOR ETERNITY !! --- AS HE STATED THAT A PERSON MUST BE ( BORN AGAIN ) THIS IS GIVEN TO ALL THOSE THAT TRUST IN HIM & WHAT HE HAS DONE FOR THEM AT CALVARY / GOLGOTHA. THIS IS A SPIRITUAL RE.BIRTH. -- YOU / WE CANNOT SAVE OURSELVES !! ---- FOR THOSE THAT DO RESPOND TO HIS CALLING -- READ / SEE -- JOHN 1 V.12 , 3 V.16 , EPHESIANS 2 VS. 8.9.10. ---- READ / SEE -- ACTS 16 VS. 27 ------------ 32----------- JOHN 14 V.6. -------- JOHN UK.
Has anyone noticed that whenever they quote 2 Chronicles 3:1, they miss out the words "on Mount Moriah" ? 2 Chronicles 3:1 "Now Solomon began to build the house of the Lord at Jerusalem on MOUNT MORIAH, where the Lord had appeared to his father David, at the place that David had prepared on the threshing floor of Ornan the Jebusite."
I would love to hear what Amir Tsarfati has to say. He lives in Jerusalem and I know he does not think the temple has to interfere with the dome of the rock.
48lilyofthevalley. It is most likely that Amir is a Mossad agent. One must be careful following his teaching since it comes with a strong political slant. Amir says the Psalm 83 war is past tense. Can not be since none of the nations in Ezekiel 38 are the same ones listed in Psalm 83. The inner circle of nations and people groups will attack first and then the Ezekiel 38 group. Amir also teaches that Saudia Arabia is now a friend of Israel. Nothing could be further from the truth. SA hates Israel and the bible more than any nation on earth. Saudia Arabia has purchased US$300 billion of weapons from America, approved by president Trump, whom Amir supports. Something is definitely not right with Amir's teachings.
BlueSky; Amir teaches that the Temple Mount is the site of the previous temples. In 2 Chronicles 3:1 we read: “Now Solomon began to build the temple at the house of the Lord at Jerusalem…at the place that David had prepared on the threshing floor of Ornan the Jebusite.” This verse conclusively says that the temple will be built in the strict boundary of the City of David at the place of the threshing floor bought from the Jebusite. That can only be in the City of David and this makes it impossible for the Temples to have been on the Temple Mount. This what scriptures say.
Why do you misquote 2 chronicles 3:1? It plainly states in the authorized, in the NKJV and in the NIV that Solomon began to build the house of the Lord at Jerusalem ON MOUNT MORIAH, where the Lord had appeared to his father David...
Guts oh I guess that’s okay then. They omitted the part that makes their whole argument fall to the ground. My Bibles already mentioned say “on” not “in”. If you’re going to argue something at least cite your source.
This is a very well presented film that would appear to give clear evidence of the Temple's actual location. Starting with the Biblical verses and archeological evidence, everything points to the Temple's actual location being in the City of David.
The documentary has used the statement by Jesus "Not one stone would be left upon another." and Josephus " It was thoroughly laid even with the ground by those that dug it up to the foundation, that there was left nothing to make those that came thither believe it had ever been inhabited". These statements have been used in the video to disprove that the Western wall could be part of the remains of the temple. But later on it shows remains of a wall in David's city with holes in it and claims these could have been where animals were tied before getting slaughtered. Clearly the same statement used to disprove the western wall also disproves that this wall with holes could have been left standing.
The Temple Institute claims that artifacts found on the Temple Mount prove that it is the true Temple location. But the Romans did more than destroy the Temple, the Romans tried to remove it's memory by destroying all records and scattering it's artifacts everywhere around. Therefore an artifact location is actually proof that the Temple was not at that location. The second Jewish Temple was completely rebuilt by the Maccabees, due to it's desecration by a capturing military, thus it is also the third Temple.
Thy words were found, and I did eat them; and thy word was unto me the joy and rejoicing of mine heart: for I am called by thy name, O Lord God of hosts... For the Lord of hosts, that planted thee, hath pronounced evil against thee, for the evil of the house of Israel and of the house of Judah, which they have done against themselves to provoke me to anger in offering incense unto Baal. And the Lord hath given me knowledge of it, and I know it: then thou shewedst me their doings. But I was like a lamb or an ox that is brought to the slaughter; and I knew not that they had devised devices against me, saying, Let us destroy the tree with the fruit thereof, and let us cut him off from the land of the living, that his name may be no more remembered... Trust ye not in lying words, saying, The temple of the Lord, The temple of the Lord, The temple of the Lord, are these. Thus saith the Lord of hosts, the God of Israel; Put your burnt offerings unto your sacrifices, and eat flesh. For I spake not unto your fathers, nor commanded them in the day that I brought them out of the land of Egypt, concerning burnt offerings or sacrifices: But this thing commanded I them, saying, Obey my voice, and I will be your God, and ye shall be my people: and walk ye in all the ways that I have commanded you, that it may be well unto you... thus saith the Lord. Amen
Could orthodox Jews ever admit that they've been risking their lives to pray at the base of a pagan fortress/temple while their backs are turned to Solomon's Temple? What would it take for them to see that they've become the butt of a cosmic joke? More than evidence, I think...
Pretty interesting, although the evidence being underground seems a bit odd to me, unless say that was more of a logistics area where things were held/prepared, and outside was the temple itself (of which I could see blood pouring through the floor and needing channels to keep it from getting everywhere). It would be a super pain to do everything needed if the water source was further away, and to fill the laver and such. This "fixes" the fight over the dome of the rock, although I think poses delay in the 3rd temple's construction just due to ground work needing to be done. With most everything else prepared, I suppose they would approve any non-Shabbat overtime needed to "make it happen". With this being 5 yrs ago, I wonder if there is anything more updated on the matter. Last I had heard, everybody was still pointing to the dome of the rock, and trying to determine if the temple and the mosque could perhaps lay side by side or the whole situation where some Muslims are indicating that that site isn't the most important, but rather Mecca, SA is their place of highest importance (something I was hearing when the first Abraham Accords were fresh).
In my Buganda culture or tradition the first Temple on earth known as EKISWA means Anthill or Anthill termites was first built by the Red ants or termites known as "Enkuyege" and their King living in KISWA or Anthill was known as NAMUNSWA and when it comes to King Solomon is a similar story because while Solomon was building a Temple for Ghosts the Red ants or termites ate his stick and Solomon fell down and died and was the reason why his Temple was named after the red ants known as Swa which ate his stick came to be named Al'Aqswa
Why not quoting the complete verse of II Cro 3:1? "Then Solomon began to build the house of the LORD at Jerusalem in mount Moriah, where the LORD appeared unto David his father, in the place that David had prepared in the threshingfloor of Ornan the Jebusite. "
Isaiah 2 -And it shall come to pass in the last days, that the mountain of the LORD'S house shall be established in the top of the mountains, and shall be exalted above the hills; Sounds like the city of David will rise above the dome of the rock. Earthquake perhaps.
Seems weird that they would've built the temple in a place undefendable during a siege rather than inside the walls of Zion. The City of David just makes more sense to me for all the reasons named as well as logistically.
I think details are important. Yes the crusaders took of the crescent moon of this building on the temple mount. But what we know about the history of this location is highly debatable as well. It is clearly a Byzantine style and thereby Christian, building. People say it has been build by the first-Christians and then taken by the muslims. The design is the same as the dome of the Church of the Holy Sepulchre but it is on a higher ground and it is gold. And it has blasphemous lyrics from the quran on it. And never forget, the crusades were a reaction on the (still on going) jihad of islam. There were nine crusades, but thousands of attacks of muslims on Christians, and it is still on going.
Let me prove how silly it is to say, that Solomon's Temple was not built on the huge, almost flat plateau of Temple Mount, where some couple of hundreds of thousands or more, of people, virtually the whole nation, who were OBLIGED to come together every year, to attend at least one of three important religious festivities, could congregate around God's Temple. You are trying to tell us, that, instead, Solomon has built the Temple on the steep slopes of Mt Zion, where it was absolutely out of the question, that those huge masses of people could congregate, plus those money changers, and those who were selling sacrificial animals to those thousands of pilgrims etc... Apart from this, everybody knows, that when Solomon built the Temple, more than 900 BC, the Romans did not even exist yet! Italy belonged to Etruscans. The very small city of Rome was only established some 200 years (Allegedly 753 BC), about 200 years after Solomon built the Temple. The Romans first arrived in Jerusalem in 64 BC, which means, that it was long after the Second Temple was already standing for 500 years, on the same spot of Solomon's Temple, which was destroyed by Babylonians in about 567 BC. And you are trying to make us believe, that the huge plateau of Temple Mount, the place ideal to build the Temple, and accommodate hundreds of thousands of pilgrims, gathered together for the national religious festivities, was waiting empty for about 700 years, for the Romans, to come and build there their fortress Antonia! By the way, the fortress Antonia was not built by the Romans, but by Herod the Great, just beyond the northern end of the Temple Mount plateau, just adjacent to it, and it was called Baris! Only later, he renamed it to Antonia, after Roman general Mark Antony. Anyway, it is a complete nonsense to say that the Solomon's as well as the Second Temple were built anywhere else, than on the Temple Mount. Why, now, on the very spot of Solomon's Temple, stands Muslims' "Dome of the Rock" and because of that's the Temple cannot ever be rebuilt, is just another story, but the answer is obvious and is also in the Bible.
Fully agree Jerzi - Except 'The Dome' is on the peak of the mountain - not the flat Threshing Floor where building and sacrifice could be carried out. Plus The Dome is not in line with The Golden Gate and the Ascention Point on the Mount of Olives. So we don't need to remove the Dome to make Way for 'the temple'. Do we?
I find it odd, that Christians wanting/wishing/desirous for the rebuilding of the Jewish Third Temple would be so concerned as to where its location ought to be. After all, if Christians are hoping for this Temple to be rebuilt for the sole purpose of their Messiah to come back (which would induce the 'End of Days'), then having it built on Al-Aqsa or Haram al-Sharif or the City of David shouldn't matter, should it? After all, according to Revelations, Messiah can't/won't come back until all of humanity attempts to wipe itself out anyways, so shouldn't Christians be eager for this fight?
rebuilding the temple is blasphemy and christians who want it are idolators. jesus comes back to jerusalem on the mount of olives and destroys the city
The prophet Micah writes; "Zion will be ploughed like a field, Jerusalem will become a heap of rubble. the temple hill a mound overgrown with thickets." (Micah @) Where are the thickets on the current site of the supposed Temple Mount? It is built on solid rock. The Temple Mount lies covered with thickets in the City of David and as yet has to be discovered. The Millennial Temple will be built in the City of David on the original site of the Temple, not where the Dome of the Rock Mosque is situated. @t
The Roman Fortress was on the "temple mount sight". It was the only place large enough to hold that many soldiers(& everything else involved with a Army). The Crusaders later built a church on this same location as they too occupied the Fortress. The Muslims, when they conquered Jerusalem took over that crusader church, The Fort & established a Victory Mosque(Still there today) . The Temple is in Zion/CityofDavid, near the spring. Josephus gives the location. Id say the jews are just being greedy but that would be anti-semitic....
Finally, truth published. Romans 3:3-5 3 For what if some did not believe? Will their unbelief make the faithfulness of God without effect? 4 Certainly not! Indeed, let God be true but every man a liar. As it is written: “That You may be justified in Your words, And may overcome when You are judged.”
Lorraine Green: Namecalling coupled with the logical fallacies of attributing to the Jews construction endeavors they never undertook, plus implying that Cornuke's lie that the entire 10th legion was there is true is not a rebuttal.
The Bible clearly states that the temple stood on Mt. Moriah which we know as the temple mount area. Jewish historians and others agree with scripture. Mt. Moriah was not in the old city of David but further north. Refer to Derek Walker and Michael Rood on the subject. Cornuke is presenting flimsy evidence basing it on Earnest Martin's claims and neither are correct.
"they will say no more, ‘The ark of the covenant of the Lord.’ It shall not come to mind, nor shall they remember it, nor shall they visit it, nor shall it be made anymore." [Jeremiah 3:16] ANYONE OUT THERE IN THE DIGITAL REALM WHO CAN POINT OUT ANY SCRIPTURE VERSE/S THAT PUTS THIS INTO A TIME FRAME? (after the 3rd temple is destroyed maybe?) "“Then it shall come to pass, when you are multiplied and increased in the land in those days,” says the Lord, “that they will say no more, ‘The ark of the covenant of the Lord.’ It shall not come to mind, nor shall they remember it, nor shall they visit it, nor shall it be made anymore.
It was Dr. Ernest L Martin Ph. D. who wrote the book "The Temples that Jerusalem forgot" by ASK Publications, in 2000, that really got me interested about the true location of the Temple. This video by Robert Cornuke really makes this subject come alive as never before. This is a first class production that should be viewed by the whole world. NO MORE GAMES FOLKS! It takes courage to show people the truth, verses tradition. Robert does just that. I was told years ago by a friend that, the best place to hide something is, right under a persons nose. And here in Jerusalem is evidence right under the peoples nose, and they don't get it - - yet! I hope the blinders come off peoples eyes soon and the whole world finally gets it. In closing, great production, and I hope more people see this video.
What did the Roman historian Tacitus say about a "spring of never-failing water" at the temple in section 12 below? The Jews Book Five (1-13) of The Histories by Tacitus 11. So after encamping, as I have said, before the walls of Jerusalem, he paraded his legions in formation before the eyes of the enemy. The Jews, marshalled close under their walls, were in a position to venture further out if they were successful and had a place of refuge ready at hand in case of defeat. Titus sent against them cavalry and some cohorts in battle order, but the encounter was indecisive. Then the enemy gave ground, and for some days thereafter fought a succession of engagements just in front of the gates. Finally, repeated losses drove them behind the walls. The Romans then concentrated on an assault. After all, it seemed beneath them to wait for hunger to do its work on the enemy, and the troops actually asked to be allowed to risk their lives. Some did so because they had real courage, many from mere bravado and a desire for rewards. As for Titus, his imagination dwelt on Rome, wealth and pleasure: it would be long before these dreams were realized if Jerusalem were destined not to fall in the immediate future. But the city occupied a commanding position, and it had been reinforced by engineering works so massive that they might have rendered even a flat site impregnable. Two lofty hills were enclosed by walls skilfully staggered and forming re-entrant angles designed to expose the flank of an attacker. At the edge of the crags was a sharp drop, and a series of towers dominated the scene, 105 feet high where the rising ground helped, and 135 or 120 feet high on the lower contours. (19) These presented an impressive appearance, and to the distant observer seemed to be on a level. There were further walls inside around the palace, and a conspicuous landmark was the lofty castle of Antonia, so named by Herod in honour of Mark Antony. 12. The Temple was like a citadel and had its own walls, which had been even more laboriously and skilfully constructed than the rest. The porticoes around it constituted in themselves an excellent defensive position. To these advantages must be added a spring of never-failing water, chambers cut in the living rock, and tanks and cisterns for the storage of rainwater. Its builders had foreseen only too well that the strange practices of the Jews would lead to continual fighting. Hence everything was available for a siege, however long. Moreover, after Pompey's capture of Jerusalem, fear and experience taught them many lessons. So taking advantage of the money-grubbing instincts of the Claudian period, they purchased permission to fortify the city, and in the days of peace built walls meant for war. Already the home of a motley concourse, its population had been swollen by the fall of the other Jewish cities, for the most determined partisan leaders escaped to the capital, and thereby added to the turmoil. There were three different leaders and three armies. The long outer perimeter of the walls was held by Simon, the central part of the city by John, and the Temple by Eleazar. John and Simon could rely on numbers and equipment, Eleazar on his strategic position. But it was upon each other that they turned the weapons of battle, ambush and fire, and great stocks of corn went up in flames. Then John sent off a party of men, ostensibly to offer sacrifice but in reality to cut Eleazar and his followers to pieces, thus gaining possession of the Temple. Hence-forward, therefore, Jerusalem was divided between two factions, until, on the approach of the Romans, fighting the foreigner healed the breach between them. 13. Prodigies had occurred, but their expiation by the offering of victims or solemn vows is held to be unlawful by a nation which is the slave of superstition and the enemy of true beliefs. In the sky appeared a vision of armies in conflict, of glittering armour. A sudden lightning flash from the clouds lit up the Temple. The doors of the holy place abruptly opened, a superhuman voice was heard to declare that the gods were leaving it, and in the same instant came the rushing tumult of their departure. Few people placed a sinister interpretation upon this. The majority were convinced that the ancient scriptures of their priests alluded to the present as the very time when the Orient would triumph and from Judaea would go forth men destined to rule the world. This mysterious prophecy really referred to Vespasian and Titus, but the common people, true to the selfish ambitions of mankind, thought that this mighty destiny was reserved for them, and not even their calamities opened their eyes to the truth. We are told that the number of the besieged, old and young, men and women, amounted to 600,000. All who could bear arms did so, and more than their numbers warranted had the courage necessary. They displayed an inflexible determination, women no less than men, and the thought that they might be compelled to leave their home made them more afraid of living than of dying. This, then, was the city and nation which Titus faced. Since a headlong assault and the element of surprise were ruled out by the lie of the ground, he proposed to employ earthworks and mantlets. Each legion had its allotted task, and there was a lull in the fighting while they pushed on with the construction of every conceivable device for storming Cities, whether invented long ago or due to the ingenuity of modern times.
@@whoelseeverdiedforyou1737 nope. I believe the 2 Witnesses are the Word of God and the People Of God. BOTH of which the AntiChrist Roman Emperors tried to wipe out, and BOTH of which came back to life!
Great presentation. The work of Bob Cornuke and others on this topic confirms the prior research of Ernest L. Martin who also came to the same conclusion re the location of the Temple.
False! Cornuke has only borrowed from Martin's work to support his own fractured claims and both men are wrong. Both have misquoted the Bible and historians and ignored professional archaeologists who have lived in Israel and work there for years. Martin and Cornuke are only giving a false easy answer to an age old dilemma. The scriptures, Historians and archaeology have proven that the temples stood on what we know as the temple mount area known as Mt. Moriah. It is a falsehood to place all that God commanded in regard to Mt. Moriah as happening in the old city of David. You can also refer to Derek Walker and Michael Rood who shed viable light on the issue.
Minniebell , you’re right. Just see the collection of verses from the scriptures which I have posted in my public comment. Cornuke is carried away by a misunderstanding of the word Zion, which actually in many places denote the character of God as a spiritual dwelling place.
If we believe God’s word that no stones would be left standing from the temple as if it never existed then why do the foundation walls (Western Wall) still stand? The City of David truly gives pause for thought.
Just started watching... im excited to see this! I believe, you may be correct! Matt 24 is accurate!! Thank you so much for making this video! Maranatha! He's coming!
Who cares what the world thinks?! Keep the commandments of the God of Israel and do what he says! You think God would be ok with a "dome of Baal" right next to his temple?! No, repent, and do as the Lord says.
Col 2:8 Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition of men, after the rudiments of the world, and not after Christ. It is no doubt thru philosophy and traditions of men many have been blinded to simple truth. The Bible is the final authority and is forever settled in heaven. I think it is good to search for these buried truths however our main focus should not be on any 3rd temple, for the body of Jesus His eklessia is the 3rd temple. His Spirit dwells in man and not in man made buildings. 1Co 3:16 Know ye not that ye are the temple of God, and that the Spirit of God dwelleth in you? Act 7:48 Howbeit the most High dwelleth not in temples made with hands; as saith the prophet, Act 17:24 God that made the world and all things therein, seeing that he is Lord of heaven and earth, dwelleth not in temples made with hands;
Where did we hear this before? Traditions was the wise Leaders of the Temple stumbling stone. Giving ordinary believers all these man made rules & Traditions. Jesus told them that they were too tied up with traditions, & that hindered them from understanding his coming as prophesied all over the Torah. When someone puts anything above the Torah, then there is confusion & a loss of blessings. Twelve Apostles were picked for a reason. Very much explained in the new Testament. "Strangers will sit at Abrahams Table", & "they will take your place". The third Temple will be built as prophesied in Daniel. Antichirst will reign from there, until Jesus returns to judge all. Jesus was a Priest & a King. First coming was a priest, Second Coming will be as a King. We welcome all our Jewish Brothers & Sisters to join in worship, as our Jewish Messiah rules all the earth. A true Monarchy established on Earth, once & for all. And we all said AMEN!!!
The enemy is the father of all lies. He struggles to suppress the truth. That is how still there are peoples who don't believe in the Messiah, Yeshua, Jesus Christ.
It grieves me to reveal this, but at the 16:18-17:26 mark of this video, Bob says the Ark of the Covenant was taken out from the City of David for a festival and then taken back into the City of David. This is a total twisting and misleading of what Scripture says. Scripture actually says that after Solomon built the temple, he would bring up the Ark of the Covenant out of the City of David to the temple on Mt. Moriah. 2 Chronicles 5:2: "Then Solomon assembled to Jerusalem the elders of Israel and all the heads of the tribes, the leaders of the fathers’ households of the sons of Israel, to bring up the ark of the covenant of the Lord out of the City of David, which is Zion." Then from this point on, the Ark of the Covenant would reside permanently in the temple that Solomon built, which is also referred to as the house of the Lord. 2 Chronicles 6:10-11 Solomon states: “Now the Lord has fulfilled His word which He spoke; for I have risen in place of my father David and sit on the throne of Israel, as the Lord [e]promised, and have built the house for the name of the Lord, the God of Israel. 11 There I have placed the ark in which is the covenant of the Lord, which He made with the sons of Israel.” Please read 1 Kings chapters 7 and 8, and 2 Chronicles 4 and 5 to see for yourself that the Ark of the Covenant was taken out of the City of David and permanently placed in the temple of Solomon. Also, at the 26:43 mark of this video, when quoting 2 Chronicles 3:1, they leave out, "on Mt. Moriah." Nowhere in Scripture is the City of David referred to as Mt. Moriah. It appears they have left this part of the verse out because it doesn't fit with their theory. While they claim to be biblical, they actually twist and omit Scripture. They will give an account one day before the Lord for misleading people by twisting God's Word.
Amazing that people refuse to believe that the western wall is part of the Roman Fort. Josephus stated that after Jerusalem was destroyed and that the soldiers dug up even the very foundations of the Temple looking for the melted gold that had seeped into the crevices of the rocks and that all that was left was rubble that you would never had known that a city once stood there. Roman troops broke into the city via the northern wall of their fort and fought through to the causeway and broke down the walls into the Temple which they totally flattened and every house of the citizenry. Fort Antonia was the only structure left standing. You deniers should rejoice in this because it means that when archeologist finally locate the exact location of the Temple in the old City they will have the place to build the Temple again without touching the Islamic site. It was in 2004 when archeologists finally located the true site of the pool of Siloam, after many years of believing it was at another location.
I was Just there, iv'e seen all these digs. and more is being uncovered by the day. They will find this evidence if they continue. Even though The Word of God expresses the truth, Jews always demand a sign and they will get one soon.
@@viking670 From what I've learned (I'm not going to repeat everything) and got from decent sources (and not death sea scrolls) it was certainly NOT inside/under Fort Antonia, IF there was a last temple to be destroyed (Titus - Josephus 70 AD), it would have been rather small and OUTSIDE the fort.
If we use the Bible as our ultimate authority, it tells us clearly that the temple was not in the City of David, but upon Mt. Moriah, where the Temple Mount is today. David purchased the threshing floor from Araunah, the Jebusite 2 Samuel 24:24-25: However, the king said to Araunah, “No, but I will certainly buy it from you for a price; for I will not offer burnt offerings to the Lord my God that cost me nothing.” So David bought the threshing floor and the oxen for fifty shekels of silver. 25 Then David built there an altar to the Lord, and he offered burnt offerings and peace offerings. And the Lord responded to prayer for the land, and the plague was withdrawn from Israel. The Temple Solomon built was on Mt. Moriah. The City of David is not Mt. Moriah. 2 Chronicles 3:1-2: Then Solomon began to build the house of the Lord in Jerusalem on Mount Moriah, where the Lord had appeared to his father David, at the place that David had prepared on the threshing floor of Ornan the Jebusite. 2 He began to build on the second day in the second month of the fourth year of his reign. After Solomon built the temple, then he would bring up the Ark of the Covenant out of the City of David to the temple on Mt. Moriah. 2 Chronicles 5:2: "Then Solomon assembled to Jerusalem the elders of Israel and all the heads of the tribes, the leaders of the fathers’ households of the sons of Israel, to bring up the ark of the covenant of the Lord out of the City of David, which is Zion." Then from this point on, the Ark of the Covenant would reside permanently in the temple that Solomon built, which is also referred to as the house of the Lord. 2 Chronicles 6:10-11 Solomon states: “Now the Lord has fulfilled His word which He spoke; for I have risen in place of my father David and sit on the throne of Israel, as the Lord [e]promised, and have built the house for the name of the Lord, the God of Israel. 11 There I have placed the ark in which is the covenant of the Lord, which He made with the sons of Israel.” These verses clearly state that the Ark of the Covenant was brought out of the City of David to be placed permanently in the House of the Lord that Solomon built upon Mt. Moriah.
Do you really think the Romans would allow the Temple above or equal to their for? No their fort would tower over the temple to show who was the boss and king.
READ ISAIAH 66:1 ACTS 7:48 /17:24-26 1COR 3:16/6:19 Eph 2:21_22 The church is the ROC(YESHUA)MADE OF LIVING STONE, BUILT BY HIMSELF.THAT THE ENNEMI CANNOT DESTROY!GOD DOES NOT LIVE IN MANMADE TEMPLE.
Many facts have been disregarded for this video., for example: The many Mikva’s located outside of the south wall of the temple. The mikva’s beside the westernwall in the tunnels. Obviously there was water irrigation beside the Gihon spring. Not to mention water even on the other side (north) of the temple in the pool of the Bethesda Second the excavations in the large parking lot in the site of the city of David have found Roman courtyards and homes. Which is basically in the spot of your renderings of the temple. That’s a large spot of land in a relatively small space to begin with. Then what about the discovery of the pilgrim road that was recently discovered at the base of the city of David. You know, by the Pool of Siloam... Where does it lead??? The Temple Mount. The gutter underneath the road connects to the bottom. Not to some new place for the temple. What the threshing floor?? Why would David buy a piece of property inside the city walls of a city he’s conquered??? I mean we’re taking about 9 - 12 acres top. He would have already owned that land. But the area of the Temple Mount was outside of his City, making a lot more since. Last, what about the excavation of the Solomons gates at Ophel?? Just outside of where?? The Southern wall of the Temple Mount. The direction of his gates direct you where??? The Temple Mount. The OPPOSITE direction of the City of David.
Amen Joel - a good catalogue of Facts. I'm often finding that people are really not interested in Facts. But the prophet Joel said this, "In the last days, I will pour out My Spirit on all flesh, and your sons and daughters will prophecy, and your old men shall dream dreams."
God himself called them a "stiffnecked people" . That has been a saving thing gave them their determination to survive But as most realize it is detrimental to them changing their "traditions" that's why WE have to stir them to jealousy. As I know you well know.
what is Ironic is that they believed the Christian crusaders said it was the temple of god in the 11th century but now has not time to lose with you now.
John Grybakk, What's so strange is that these idiots hate those who practice the religion of their savior. The Bible is clear on one thing - Jesus was an observant, Orthodox Jew and never thought of starting a new religion. He said repeatedly that the most important thing was attitude to god and the Jewish Law. (I heard a nutty preacher the other day say Jesus didn't mean it - LOLOL)
How can anything be a higher Authority than YAHSHUA Hamashiach. This is nothing but a distraction. Our SAVIOUR taught the we, the saints, are the Temple. Read you Bibles and lean not on the way of man for your understanding. Trust in the Holy Spirit, for HE will teach you all things! Those are the words of our Saviour.
You admit this is the Temple from the days of our SAVIOUR. Our SAVIOUR referred to it as the HOUSE OF THE MOST HIGH. Now, you lowly and sinful man wish to correct our SAVIOUR! Shame on you for distracting and confusing the new to salvation! Quit wasting your time and start witnessing about the Gospel!
@@dwh5512 Not ALL history! Josephus contradicts this modern idea as do other ancients. Who would know better what happened back then, eyewitnesses or modern people?
What did Roman historian Tacitus say about a "spring of never-failing water" at the temple in section 12 below? He was a teenager when the temple was destroyed during 70AD. The Jews Book Five (1-13) of The Histories by Tacitus 11. So after encamping, as I have said, before the walls of Jerusalem, he paraded his legions in formation before the eyes of the enemy. The Jews, marshalled close under their walls, were in a position to venture further out if they were successful and had a place of refuge ready at hand in case of defeat. Titus sent against them cavalry and some cohorts in battle order, but the encounter was indecisive. Then the enemy gave ground, and for some days thereafter fought a succession of engagements just in front of the gates. Finally, repeated losses drove them behind the walls. The Romans then concentrated on an assault. After all, it seemed beneath them to wait for hunger to do its work on the enemy, and the troops actually asked to be allowed to risk their lives. Some did so because they had real courage, many from mere bravado and a desire for rewards. As for Titus, his imagination dwelt on Rome, wealth and pleasure: it would be long before these dreams were realized if Jerusalem were destined not to fall in the immediate future. But the city occupied a commanding position, and it had been reinforced by engineering works so massive that they might have rendered even a flat site impregnable. Two lofty hills were enclosed by walls skilfully staggered and forming re-entrant angles designed to expose the flank of an attacker. At the edge of the crags was a sharp drop, and a series of towers dominated the scene, 105 feet high where the rising ground helped, and 135 or 120 feet high on the lower contours. (19) These presented an impressive appearance, and to the distant observer seemed to be on a level. There were further walls inside around the palace, and a conspicuous landmark was the lofty castle of Antonia, so named by Herod in honour of Mark Antony. 12. The Temple was like a citadel and had its own walls, which had been even more laboriously and skilfully constructed than the rest. The porticoes around it constituted in themselves an excellent defensive position. To these advantages must be added a spring of never-failing water, chambers cut in the living rock, and tanks and cisterns for the storage of rainwater. Its builders had foreseen only too well that the strange practices of the Jews would lead to continual fighting. Hence everything was available for a siege, however long. Moreover, after Pompey's capture of Jerusalem, fear and experience taught them many lessons. So taking advantage of the money-grubbing instincts of the Claudian period, they purchased permission to fortify the city, and in the days of peace built walls meant for war. Already the home of a motley concourse, its population had been swollen by the fall of the other Jewish cities, for the most determined partisan leaders escaped to the capital, and thereby added to the turmoil. There were three different leaders and three armies. The long outer perimeter of the walls was held by Simon, the central part of the city by John, and the Temple by Eleazar. John and Simon could rely on numbers and equipment, Eleazar on his strategic position. But it was upon each other that they turned the weapons of battle, ambush and fire, and great stocks of corn went up in flames. Then John sent off a party of men, ostensibly to offer sacrifice but in reality to cut Eleazar and his followers to pieces, thus gaining possession of the Temple. Hence-forward, therefore, Jerusalem was divided between two factions, until, on the approach of the Romans, fighting the foreigner healed the breach between them.
This video misled the information regarding the Temple on the basis of the Gihon Spring which was a strong hypothesis of the speakers or the chief narrator of this video. If we read the Bible carefully in 2 Chronicles 3:1 it was clearly mentioned that Solomon began to build the House of the LORD in Jerusalem on Mount Moriah (hammoriyyah in Hebrew).
Michele Bryant oh wow. are you new to k-house? it's incredible. it's the best place to learn intellectually about our faith. " cosmic codes" is one of the most profound books you'll ever read
Hi Ben! Yes, so happy to have found this site! Thanks for the recommendation. I will check out "Cosmic Codes" Very much appreciate the recommendation. This site has re-kindled a fire!
Michele Bryant wow I'm jealous! it's not easy, after k-house, to get fed intellectually and spiritually. I remember first reading the small magazine my Dad got ("update") and even with post graduate degree I was blown away
Nice thought. Remember what Paul told the Corinthians "Has not God made foolish the wisdom of this world? Read the whole context (1Cor. 1:18 -29) And one must admit, there is a lot of foolishness in this world.
This speaks volumes to me! “If we’re ever going to find the Temple, I think we’re going to have to use the Bible, and the Bible is telling me that the Temple HAS To be in the City of David, In the Strong Hold of Zion, and the luring pole of Oral Traditions needs to be ignored.”
Yes we open bible and more often we open Quran and guess what.. we get answers and further knowledge of what is going to happen under the final days signs. Prophet Essa (jesus) and Imam Mehdi would be resurrected. And Dajjal (third eye) would be unveiled.. and truth will be revealed! That there is Only One God!
WAIT! Does Micah say "'Mountain' of the temple"? Catch that? "Mountain". I see a high place NEXT to the City of David. It is the only geographical feature in the area that could be called a mountain, certainly not the City of David. Micah certainly does not support Mr. Cornuke's theory. Also, who's to say that what we refer to now as the Temple Mount was not regarded as being a part of the City of David and Jerusalem and Zion when the temples existed. Uh-oh, 1 Kings 8:1 "bring up the ark of the Lord’s covenant from Zion, the City of David." "Bring up"....where? Into the temple. Based on 1 Kings 8, the The temple is "UP" from the City of David". Again, not a good verse to support his theory. Reading ALL of 1 Kings 8 it is clear that the festival and dedication and sacrifices were all performed in the same area that Mr. Cornuke proclaims had to be a very large area; too large to have been in The City of David, His own admission. The end of this chapter finishes with "On the following day he sent the people away. They blessed the king and then went home, joyful and glad in heart for all the good things the Lord had done for his servant David and his people Israel" 1 Kings 8:66.
Did you watch the whole video? They talked about 1 Kings 8:1 at 6:23 and answered that point before you made it. Regarding "Mountain" in Micah, it doesn't say "summit of the mountain". Furthermore, the city of David was called "Mount Zion". Micah 4:2 even uses "Mountain of the LORD" and "Zion" interchangeably. In short, the passages that you pointed out do NOT support your notion.
@@aChristian4RonPaul The Bible's pretty obvious unless someone is looking to establish something other than what it actually indicates, however, all one has to do is muddle up verses, cause a bit of confusion and insert one's own answer to a question that he/she created. I suggest you read 1 Kings 8:8 to help clear things up. It describes how things were "to this day" - AFTER the furnishings were brought "UP" from the City Of David and placed into the Temple.
Micah’s prophecy is set in the Messianic Age, when the topography of Israel will be different. The area from Geba to Rimmon will become a plain. The Mount of Olives will be split in two by an earthquake as Messiah’s feet touches it. Jerusalem most likely will be pushed up above its present location , thus a higher mountain on which Ezekiel’s Temple will be built.
This theory makes complete sense, especially when taken into account their data. So the Temple was in the City of David Yes, the Temple was in Zion Yes, the Temple was on mount Moriah yes at the lower slope, connecting to David's City at the Ophel and the area that would be in the area of Orlan's threshing floor. Tick tick tick.
Didn't Josephus write that the sanctuary of the temple, the east gate and the summit of the mount of olives all lined up perfectly east to west? That would seem to contradict this theory?
The Eastern Gate which is there today was built in the 5th or 6th century, and not there at the time of Temple. Any Biblical references (or those by Josephus) to an Eastern Gate would therefore be speaking of something which existed prior to the current gate, the exact location of which would be speculative.
@@Gutslinger I didn't say Josephus was speculative. I said the exact location of that about which Josephus was speaking can only be speculative, as the gate which stands there today was built five or six hundred years *after* the gate which Josephus described. We have no way of knowing whether the present gate was built on the same location of the previous gate, which had been gone for half a millennia before the current gate was built.
Spot on Kotic1033. You can even see it from the Lutheran Tower that he spoke from. I've been there - tremendous panoramas. Well worth the climb of about 117 steps. It's all about "Being Inline With The Word of God"
And for some strange reason, Cornuke has always seemed to be reluctant to give the credit and recognition to Ron that Ron deserves. I find that dissatisfying to say the least.
Ron Wyatt is a fraud. He have zero evidence. Exactly as you said Ron Wyatt is the greatest archeologist of all time, he found more than anybody else and his findings are more important than other's. Except he have exactly zero evidence and his story lack logic.
great video! May we keep in mind that ANYONE who builds a 3rd temple will be doing so for the antiChrist to stand in the midst and declare himself to be God, not for Messiah. A temple will be built. We should take no part in helping that along. shalom
John Eli How could it not be holy if the abomonation of desolation can stand in the holy place? Matt 24:15, Mark 13:14 and 2 Thess 2:1-4 and Rev 11:1-2
Fascinating! I certainly believe we are in the end times, and there is nothing hid that will not be shown. I used to believe the Bible was contradictory, but with further study over the years, I find it is not contradictory at all, but is, as our Heavenly Father intended, a true story that leads us straight to Him!!! Ahmein
Josephus had acted as a mediator for the Romans and, when negotiations failed, witnessed the siege and aftermath. He wrote: Now as soon as the army had no more people to slay or to plunder, because there remained none to be the objects of their fury (for they would not have spared any, had there remained any other work to be done), [Titus] Caesar gave orders that they should now demolish the entire city and Temple, but should leave as many of the towers standing as they were of the greatest eminence; that is, Phasaelus, and Hippicus, and Mariamne; and so much of the wall enclosed the city on the west side. This wall was spared, in order to afford a camp for such as were to lie in garrison [in the Upper City], as were the towers [the three forts] also spared, in order to demonstrate to posterity what kind of city it was, and how well fortified, which the Roman valor had subdued; but for all the rest of the wall [surrounding Jerusalem], it was so thoroughly laid even with the ground
it is also interesting to note in matthew 24:1-2 Jesus says "not a stone will be left upon another", looking at the western wall, these stones are clearly still upon one another. Therefore the city of david (where there is no appearance of walls/stacked stones) fits this description, and what is considered the temple mount by most, does not.
Its such an interesting statement that at the time seemed dramatic but now seems (is) prophetic. Why make that statement in the way He did. He is accountable to all His creation to be exactly right in His judgment. And we will be judged on what He has revealed.
Some BS , The Temple Had a Water Source , There's only one Water Source , Do Not get the Place you rebuild Wrong , and the Lord God Said He No Longer Needs your burnt Offerings , The Masiha was Christ who has come and Gone already but is to return , Do Not be a Backward People :( है।🙏💐 QC
Thanks for your insight and research. Wish I could visit the City of David and the Gihon spring, the true site of the temple. As a kid I always wondered about the western wall and Jesus prophecy of no stone left upon another. Now I know the truth.
When you open your heart to the world and love everything God has created The same way you love yourself God will open the heaven for you King David 7🔯שלום
The "renown biblical archaeologists" the revisionists rely upon to assert such drivel (Ernst Martin was a meteorologist who knew nothing about academic archeology and the same goes for Robert Cornuke) clearly have not studied Charles Warren, Eilat Mazar, Conrad Schick, Barclay and Willson. Dr. Martin's theory was disproved by the experts already in the early 1990's. The Giḥon spring only fed the residents' needs for water. Conversely, multiple cisterns and water sources are found on the Temple Mount. The Temple Mount has over 20 cisterns and conduits which were plenty of water for the services (I have seen for myself their capped openings on Har haBayit) . One cistern could hold over 2 million gallons and another around 700,000 gallons. This is verified history.On top of this, Jewish records show that there was an aqueduct that brought water in abundance to the Temple Mt. from the Pools of Solomon at Etan near Bethlehem (not to be confused with the aqueduct that Pilot later built). Cornuke and his ilk really do not know what they are talking about. The building of the Ophel south of the wall was actually the Akra which was built by Antiochus IV and destroyed by Shimon the Macabee. The City of David is not wide enough to place the 740 x 740 feet that made the 500 x 500 cubits of Temple Mt. Bad scholarship by these people using Ernest Martin's book which was discredited a while back. Ernest Martin is not a credible resource but Dr Benjamin Mazar, Dr. Eilat Mazar, Captain Charles Warren, Conrad Schick, Lee Ritmeyer and others are, and they all agree Mt. Moriah is the Temple Mount. By the way, the Fort of Antonia was around 40 cubits high on a high ground. The 10th legion only came to Jerusalem after the siege of Jerusalem and a cohort is 500-600 soldiers. According to Josephus the Antonia fortress was razed to the ground by the Romans in order to access the Temple Mt during the destruction of the 2nd Temple. This is only one of many points that I can give to why Dr. Martin's theory can not hold water and why Bob Cornuke is fooling thousands of gullible people like them, who do not know any better. The headquarters for the Roman soldiers was in Caesarea by the sea. The Antonia was not new, it was a fort that was constructed by Solomon and then rebuilt by Nehemia and called the Baris. Herod later expanded the area by filling in the fosse found on the north of the Temple and it was according to Josephus 60 feet deep and 250 wide as protection for the Temple from the north. Herod filled it up and expanded beyond the 500 cubits starting from the offset stone called the Persian stone from Nehemia's time. The experts of the City of David excavations and around the Temple Mt., who work daily to reveal the history of ancient Jerusalem, have found nothing to date that suggests the Temple Mt. was the Antonia fortress. Anyway, Herod expanded to the north, west and south and those are retaining walls which were not part of the biblical measurements. By the way, no credible recognized archeologist says the Temple was south of the Temple Mount. For example, all these archaeologists from the 1800's and 1900's who had access to the site said the same thing about the Temple being on the Temple Mt.: DeVougue 1864, Ferguson 1878, Warren 1880, Conder 1884, Schick 1896, Watson 1896, Mommert 1903, Dalman 1909, Hollis 1934, Simons 1952, Vincent 1954, Ritmeyer 1985. And Josephus must be studied in unity with the Mishnah, Tosefta and the works of Conrad Schick topographical work of the Temple Mount. Josephus whom Martin and Cornuke both falsely quote, never said the Temple was in the city of David nor did he ever say an entire legion of Roman soldiers and their hangers on was permanently living in Jerusalem. He used the word "Tema" which means a lesser amount. Cornuke also doctors excerpts from the Jewish Bible so that they fit the claims he attempts to hawk. He has even lied that Israeli archaeologist Eli Shoukrun claimed that the Holy Temples stood in the City of David, whereas Shoukrun insists on the traditional site's location. The Jewish tradition about the Temple Mount's location boasts anecdotal contiguity since the early AD 70's. Evidently, Josephus was aware of Jews who had begun returning daily to the Mount a mere 2-3 days after the Holy Temple had been sacked. This presence continues among others through early rabbis who ascended to it and was punctuated only for a few years in the Bar-Kokhvah revolt of 132-135 AD until the Byzantine era, when Jews were permitted to go there only one day a year. It is then, intriguingly, in the 4th century, that two gentile authors attest to this Jewish presence and note how the Jews would come up to the giant Foundation Stone and brush it with oil. Daily Jewish presence is renewed during the Persian occupation of the early 7th century and shortly afterward with the Arab Muslim occupation of 638, a presence that was pretty uninterrupted until the First Crusade of 1099. To even suggest we Jews are so dumb that we managed to forget our holiest site along the way since the AD70 Destruction is preposterous and offensive; and utterly arrogant when stated by non-Jews. So this tradition is rock solid, and none of the Christians who attempt to defy it can provide convincing answers that bear scrutiny to the question of when the Jews forgot the supposed original site.
@@ZviJ1 God will have His temple built wherever He wills it. This is a good thing. I personally don't think the site will be the mount. I think it'll be built in Shiloh. As I said, we'll soon find out.
God's word is never wrong. This is absolutely fascinating to learn about! EVERYTHING in this video makes so much sense. So glad God led me to your video!
Until you look at the evidence of why the temple was NOT in the "city of David" proper, as we know it today.. ... David bought the ground that was the threshing floor of Joash .. Threshing floors would NEVER be placed near, over, on our around a spring... it would severely contaminate the water ... Solomon built the temple on the ground David purchased. Which was up on Mt. Moriah .. He then built an aqueduct system six miles like from Hebron by Bethlehem that went to giant cisterns under the temple. Those are still evident today. And they do not branch off into the city. They go straight to the cisterns under the temple mount... The reservoirs that the water was taken from are still there to this day, and very full all the time... The water coming from Hebron was under hydrostatic pressure and flowed downhill into the cisterns. The water from the Gihon spring would have had to be pumped up into the temple to wash away the massive blood from the sacrifice ... This is just one obvious reason that the temple was not in the place this video supposed.. There are a thousand reasons more..
I always found that interesting because the Bible said there shall not be one stone upon another and yet they go pray at a whole wall. I was watching a Jewish man walking the wall a few years ago talking about it being the temple and i just kept thinking, that doesn't make sense. The Bible is nothing if not perfectly literal and if God says no stone upon another, than I'm pretty sure there isn't going to be a whole section of wall. Great video!
That’s the retaining wall they pray at….not the actual temple wall stones.
@@ryankilgore6647 it’s not even that… what you call the retaining wall is the retaining wall of the Roman Fortress…. The Word also days we will plow the field where the temple once stood. Go and look up old pictures and see for yourself.
"Great is the Lord, and greatly to be praised in the City of our God, in the mountain of His Holiness. BEAUTIFUL FOR SITUATION, the joy of the whole earth, is Mt. Zion on the sides of the north, the City of the great King. I have loved this song for 37 years and now discover why!!!!!
I sang this song this morning! Psalm 48:1-2. I miss Chuck Missler too.
Bob Cornuke. I just talked with Dave. He had such a wonderful time with you this past week. He was so impressed with you. He spoke very highly.
I agree with what you’ve said here. Hope that some day we can visit and talk about these things. Good luck and God a less and protect you and yours.
I was blessed today to know this truth. Thank you Lord! The time is near!
What Cornuke is stating is NOT the truth. He builds is claims on that of Earnest Martin and both men are wrong. They have misquoted the Bible,, historians and ignored archaeological evidence. Do your own research into the subject starting with Biblical truth. You can also watch Derek Walker and Michael Rood on the subject for clarification.
Minniebell, what causes you to believe the temple was not built in the City of David? I’m quite interested.
Closer today. Even so, Come Lord Jesus.
@PRINCE SHAMIYAH144 the heathens are many.&time is short.
@Elaine Kilgore
The "renown biblical archaeologists" that the revisionists rely upon to assert such drivel (Ernst Martin was a meteorologist who knew nothing about academic archeology and the same goes for Robert Cornuke) clearly have not studied Charles Warren, Eilat Mazar, Conrad Schick, Barclay and Willson. Dr. Martin's theory was disproved by the experts already in the early 1990's.
The Giḥon spring only fed the residents' needs for water. Conversely, multiple cisterns and water sources are found on the Temple Mount. The Temple Mount has over 20 cisterns and conduits which were plenty of water for the services (I have seen for myself their capped openings on Har haBayit) . One cistern could hold over 2 million gallons and another around 700,000 gallons. This is verified history.On top of this, Jewish records show that there was an aqueduct that brought water in abundance to the Temple Mt. from the Pools of Solomon at Etan near Bethlehem (not to be confused with the aqueduct that Pilot later built). Cornuke and his ilk really do not know what they are talking about.
The building of the Ophel south of the wall was actually the Akra which was built by Antiochus IV and destroyed by Shimon the Macabee. The City of David is not wide enough to place the 740 x 740 feet that made the 500 x 500 cubits of Temple Mt.
Bad scholarship by these people using Ernest Martin's book which was discredited a while back.
Ernest Martin is not a credible resource but Dr Benjamin Mazar, Dr. Eilat Mazar, Captain Charles Warren, Conrad Schick, Lee Ritmeyer and others are, and they all agree Mt. Moriah is the Temple Mount. By the way, the Fort of Antonia was around 40 cubits high on a high ground. The 10th legion only came to Jerusalem after the siege of Jerusalem and a cohort is 500-600 soldiers. According to Josephus the Antonia fortress was razed to the ground by the Romans in order to access the Temple Mt during the destruction of the 2nd Temple. This is only one of many points that I can give to why Dr. Martin's theory can not hold water and why Bob Cornuke is fooling thousands of gullible people who do not know any better.
The headquarters for the Roman soldiers was in Caesarea by the sea. The Antonia was not new, it was a fort that was constructed by Solomon and then rebuilt by Nehemia and called the Baris. Herod later expanded the area by filling in the fosse found on the north of the Temple and it was according to Josephus 60 feet deep and 250 wide as protection for the Temple from the north. Herod filled it up and expanded beyond the 500 cubits starting from the offset stone called the Persian stone from Nehemia's time.
The experts of the City of David excavations and around the Temple Mt., who work daily to reveal the history of ancient Jerusalem, have found nothing to date that suggests the Temple Mt. was the Antonia fortress.
Anyway, Herod expanded to the north, west and south and those are retaining walls which were not part of the biblical measurements.
By the way, no credible recognized archeologist says the Temple was south of the Temple Mount. For example, all these archaeologists from the 1800's and 1900's who had access to the site said the same thing about the Temple being on the Temple Mt.: DeVougue 1864, Ferguson 1878, Warren 1880, Conder 1884, Schick 1896, Watson 1896, Mommert 1903, Dalman 1909, Hollis 1934, Simons 1952, Vincent 1954, Ritmeyer 1985.
And Josephus must be studied in unity with the Mishnah, Tosefta and the works of Conrad Schick topographical work of the Temple Mount. Josephus whom Martin and Cornuke both falsely quote, never said the Temple was in the city of David nor did he ever say an entire legion of Roman soldiers and their hangers on was permanently living in Jerusalem. He used the word "Tema" which means a lesser amount. Cornuke also doctors excerpts from the Jewish Bible so that they fit the claims he attempts to hawk. He has even lied that Israeli archaeologist Eli Shoukrun claimed that the Holy Temples stood in the City of David, whereas Shoukrun insists on the traditional site's location.
The Jewish tradition about the Temple Mount's location boasts anecdotal contiguity since the early AD 70's. Evidently, Josephus was aware of Jews who had begun returning daily to the Mount a mere 2-3 days after the Holy Temple had been sacked. This presence continues among others through early rabbis who ascended to it and was punctuated only for a few years in the Bar-Kokhvah revolt of 132-135 AD until the Byzantine era, when Jews were permitted to go there only one day a year. It is then, intriguingly, in the 4th century, that two gentile authors attest to this Jewish presence and note how the Jews would come up to the giant Foundation Stone and brush it with oil. Daily Jewish presence is renewed during the Persian occupation of the early 7th century and shortly afterward with the Arab Muslim occupation of 638, a presence that was pretty uninterrupted until the First Crusade of 1099. To even suggest we Jews are so dumb that we managed to forget our holiest site along the way since the AD70 Destruction is preposterous and offensive; and utterly arrogant when stated by non-Jews. So this tradition is rock solid, and none of the Christians who attempt to defy it can provide convincing answers that bear scrutiny to the question of when the Jews forgot the supposed original site.
Excellent. Thank you Bob Carnuke.and Koinonia House.
Traditions are for men with pride, the word of God is for salvation🙏
The Most High dwelleth not in Temples made with hands!
Aquila one day he will be with us in the New Jereslem and will be our ruler and King David will be our shepherd.belive the and the will be peace all the time there will be not haters and racists lier, theft, I could go on but only the rightous will be there believe that.
He dwell in our hearts now if we are truly bornagain believers but one day God is going to dwell in the New Jereslem we all sinners are destroyed form this land.. didn't you know that there will be one big happy family of all races and colors and greeds no more war, fighting, killing, it will be peace, peace, for ever more all bad people's will be in the lake of 🔥 for ever ever more. Believe that.
Finally Wise man
Its so obvious that the temple mount used to be Fortress Antionia,if you have seen one Roman Castrum you have seem them all,they are all built to the same specs.
"We go by our traditions" they say. ...nothing hath changed since the days Messiah walked that land and were rejected by the religious crowd. Sad to see. ...but it is just how it has always been. God alone can put an end to that. And He shall. ......soon I believe. Oh happy day.
Right and keeping Christmas, Easter, Halloween, Valentine's Day and Sunday is what Jesus practiced...
We’ve been told a lot of lies. A broken and contrite spirit God will
Not despise!
@@beckyevans1154So why do so many Christians keep blessing and promoting these liars and their false Israel?
@Becky Evans But the deity in your religion is firstly "God the Father", which all Christians, except for you, insist is the same Father/God the Jews worship. This means you insist that your coreligionists believe in a divine liar. People expressing your kind of view cannot be taken seriously in the least, if they are Christian.
This is why we dismiss you as a l-u-n-a-t-i-c.
Bert Graef because we know from Paul’s writings that God is not done with Israel, we, were grafted into their broken branches, but they are still to be honored for Salvation is of the Jews even as Jesus was a Jew (not the religion but the blood line). That’s why.
Fascinating. Thank you Koinonia House, thank you Rod, and thank you God
Psalm 2 where God says I have installed my King on Zion, my holy hill. Keyword Zion!
Thank you very much for sharing and God Bless All. Take care kiddos:)
wrong. The builders rejected the chief cornerstone. You people are simply following the blind Jews into the ditch they have been in for 2000 years.
What a down to earth question, and down to earth answer: are you a Jew? No. It have no time to loose with you. Oil an vinegar don’t mix.
Claudio I don't understand why you have no time for her just because she no she wasn't a Jew because if you go to Heaven you all will be together there why not get a lone now it won't be no bull crap in Heaven that's for sure haha
They are better than you....they believe.
Didnt that warm your heart?
Great documentary; possibly the best I have seen on the temple location!
I'm with you 100%, The Holy Bibles does NOT lie,.
dumb! it is written by a human!
Don’t be fooled. The “tradition” you refer to is fully supported by the Bible. This film is using part of Scripture, not all. The total of Scripture actually shows Mr. Cornuke to be badly misled.
@@RapidFire829 All books are written by humans. what's your point?So- where all so called science books
Moses had horns in the early bibel translations. Not anymore, but in the same chapter the 2 altars still have Horn. Now moses has Sun rays in his face , and the two altars should also have the translation :Ray.. The altar for the sun has sun ray , the moon altar has moon ray. It all fits. ua-cam.com/video/KjaUt5vU0-w/v-deo.html
SHANAYA STAR , YOU ARE THE IGNORANT ONE !! THE ONE * LORD ALMIGHTY * GOD YAHWEH , THE * LORD YESHUA / JESUS * CHRIST / THE * SON OF * GOD / THE * SON OF THE MOST HIGH / THE * HOLY SPIRIT ( THE HOLY , DIVINE , RIGHTEOUS , MAJESTIC ( GODHEAD ) THE SCRIPTURES --- THE WRITTEN * WORD OF * GOD !! FOR HE * CHRIST IS THE * WORD OF * GOD IN THE FLESH / HUMAN --- YET WITHOUT SIN !! ---- THE * LORD SPOKE THROUGH HIS PROPHETS OF OLD & IN THESE LAST DAYS HAS SPOKEN THROUGH HIS * SON YESHUA / JESUS -- THE * CHRIST / THE * FATHER'S ANOINTED ONE !! YES , THE SCRIPTURES WERE NOT WRITTEN BY MAN'S WISDOM , WILL OR INTELLECT BUT BY THE WILL OF THE * LORD !! --- READ / SEE THE OLD TESTAMENT PROPHECIES AS RE. THE * LORD & HIS FIRST COMING INTO THIS FALLEN SINFUL WORLD TO SAVE SINNERS FROM ETERNAL DEATH , FORGIVENESS OF YOUR , MY , OUR SINS !! ---- YES , THE SINLESS * SON OF * GOD WENT TO THE CROSS / TREE AT CALVARY / GOLGOTHA / THE SHEDDING OF HIS PRECIOUS BLOOD FOR YOU , ME , US ---- ALL MANKIND !! 1 CORINTHIANS 15 VS. 1 ------ 4 -------- YES , PROPHECIES AS RE. HIS SUFFERING ON THE CROSS / TREE !! ISAIAH 53 , THE PSALMS . FORTOLD ONE THOUSAND YEARS BEFORE CRUCIFIXION WAS KNOWN & USED AS PUNISHMENT !! -- YES , THERE IS NO OTHER NAME GIVEN UNDER HEAVEN WHEREBY WE MUST BE SAVED !! ACTS 4 V.12. ---- TURN FROM YOUR SIN OF UNBELIEF -- A CHANGE OF MIND ?! -- TURN AWAY FROM WHATEVER THAT YOU HAVE PUT YOUR HOPE & TRUST IN - YOUR IDOLATRY / IDOLS & TURN TO THE * LORD YESHUA / JESUS * CHRIST & RECEIVE HIM INTO YOUR LIFE / LIVES AS YOUR * LORD & * SAVIOUR -- THUS BE SAVED FOR ETERNITY !! --- AS HE STATED THAT A PERSON MUST BE ( BORN AGAIN ) THIS IS GIVEN TO ALL THOSE THAT TRUST IN HIM & WHAT HE HAS DONE FOR THEM AT CALVARY / GOLGOTHA. THIS IS A SPIRITUAL RE.BIRTH. -- YOU / WE CANNOT SAVE OURSELVES !! ---- FOR THOSE THAT DO RESPOND TO HIS CALLING -- READ / SEE -- JOHN 1 V.12 , 3 V.16 , EPHESIANS 2 VS. 8.9.10. ---- READ / SEE -- ACTS 16 VS. 27 ------------ 32----------- JOHN 14 V.6. -------- JOHN UK.
Has anyone noticed that whenever they quote 2 Chronicles 3:1, they miss out the words "on Mount Moriah" ? 2 Chronicles 3:1 "Now Solomon began to build the house of the Lord at Jerusalem on MOUNT MORIAH, where the Lord had appeared to his father David, at the place that David had prepared on the threshing floor of Ornan the Jebusite."
Maranatha!
Thank you Brother Robert...and as they say these days...Freakin' Awesome! Jesus' grace be multiplied unto you. Amen in Christ.
I would love to hear what Amir Tsarfati has to say. He lives in Jerusalem and I know he does not think the temple has to interfere with the dome of the rock.
48lilyofthevalley. It is most likely that Amir is a Mossad agent. One must be careful following his teaching since it comes with a strong political slant. Amir says the Psalm 83 war is past tense. Can not be since none of the nations in Ezekiel 38 are the same ones listed in Psalm 83. The inner circle of nations and people groups will attack first and then the Ezekiel 38 group. Amir also teaches that Saudia Arabia is now a friend of Israel. Nothing could be further from the truth. SA hates Israel and the bible more than any nation on earth. Saudia Arabia has purchased US$300 billion of weapons from America, approved by president Trump, whom Amir supports. Something is definitely not right with Amir's teachings.
BlueSky; Amir teaches that the Temple Mount is the site of the previous temples. In 2 Chronicles 3:1 we read: “Now Solomon began to build the temple at the house of the Lord at Jerusalem…at the place that David had prepared on the threshing floor of Ornan the Jebusite.” This verse conclusively says that the temple will be built in the strict boundary of the City of David at the place of the threshing floor bought from the Jebusite. That can only be in the City of David and this makes it impossible for the Temples to have been on the Temple Mount. This what scriptures say.
Why do you misquote 2 chronicles 3:1? It plainly states in the authorized, in the NKJV and in the NIV that Solomon began to build the house of the Lord at Jerusalem ON MOUNT MORIAH, where the Lord had appeared to his father David...
**In** Mount Moriah.. Not "on."
They didn't misquote, either. They just omitted that part.
Guts oh I guess that’s okay then. They omitted the part that makes their whole argument fall to the ground. My Bibles already mentioned say “on” not “in”. If you’re going to argue something at least cite your source.
Right ON Donner - "IT PLAINLY STATES - ON Mount Moriah - On the threshing floor." But not on the peak - only the M's would be daft enough to do that.
This is a very well presented film that would appear to give clear evidence of the Temple's actual location. Starting with the Biblical verses and archeological evidence, everything points to the Temple's actual location being in the City of David.
No it doesn't.
The documentary has used the statement by Jesus "Not one stone would be left upon another." and Josephus " It was thoroughly laid even with the ground by those that dug it up to the foundation, that there was left nothing to make those that came thither believe it had ever been inhabited". These statements have been used in the video to disprove that the Western wall could be part of the remains of the temple. But later on it shows remains of a wall in David's city with holes in it and claims these could have been where animals were tied before getting slaughtered. Clearly the same statement used to disprove the western wall also disproves that this wall with holes could have been left standing.
Why do Christians obsess over the temple yet ignore what Jesus said about how to treat people?
Thank you!
A GREAT Thanks for the Research and ALL that you have Given US....
The Temple Institute claims that artifacts found on the Temple Mount prove that it is the true Temple location. But the Romans did more than destroy the Temple, the Romans tried to remove it's memory by destroying all records and scattering it's artifacts everywhere around. Therefore an artifact location is actually proof that the Temple was not at that location. The second Jewish Temple was completely rebuilt by the Maccabees, due to it's desecration by a capturing military, thus it is also the third Temple.
???? the western wall is not part of the temple ...how silly..i have no problem with the western wall being part of the roman fort
Soo...why the people of Israel still consider it as Holy wall...?????
Thy words were found, and I did eat them; and thy word was unto me the joy and rejoicing of mine heart: for I am called by thy name, O Lord God of hosts... For the Lord of hosts, that planted thee, hath pronounced evil against thee, for the evil of the house of Israel and of the house of Judah, which they have done against themselves to provoke me to anger in offering incense unto Baal. And the Lord hath given me knowledge of it, and I know it: then thou shewedst me their doings. But I was like a lamb or an ox that is brought to the slaughter; and I knew not that they had devised devices against me, saying, Let us destroy the tree with the fruit thereof, and let us cut him off from the land of the living, that his name may be no more remembered... Trust ye not in lying words, saying, The temple of the Lord, The temple of the Lord, The temple of the Lord, are these. Thus saith the Lord of hosts, the God of Israel; Put your burnt offerings unto your sacrifices, and eat flesh. For I spake not unto your fathers, nor commanded them in the day that I brought them out of the land of Egypt, concerning burnt offerings or sacrifices: But this thing commanded I them, saying, Obey my voice, and I will be your God, and ye shall be my people: and walk ye in all the ways that I have commanded you, that it may be well unto you... thus saith the Lord. Amen
This is very fascinating...
Could orthodox Jews ever admit that they've been risking their lives to pray at the base of a pagan fortress/temple while their backs are turned to Solomon's Temple? What would it take for them to see that they've become the butt of a cosmic joke? More than evidence, I think...
Pretty interesting, although the evidence being underground seems a bit odd to me, unless say that was more of a logistics area where things were held/prepared, and outside was the temple itself (of which I could see blood pouring through the floor and needing channels to keep it from getting everywhere). It would be a super pain to do everything needed if the water source was further away, and to fill the laver and such. This "fixes" the fight over the dome of the rock, although I think poses delay in the 3rd temple's construction just due to ground work needing to be done. With most everything else prepared, I suppose they would approve any non-Shabbat overtime needed to "make it happen". With this being 5 yrs ago, I wonder if there is anything more updated on the matter. Last I had heard, everybody was still pointing to the dome of the rock, and trying to determine if the temple and the mosque could perhaps lay side by side or the whole situation where some Muslims are indicating that that site isn't the most important, but rather Mecca, SA is their place of highest importance (something I was hearing when the first Abraham Accords were fresh).
In my Buganda culture or tradition the first Temple on earth known as EKISWA means Anthill or Anthill termites was first built by the Red ants or termites known as "Enkuyege" and their King living in KISWA or Anthill was known as NAMUNSWA and when it comes to King Solomon is a similar story because while Solomon was building a Temple for Ghosts the Red ants or termites ate his stick and Solomon fell down and died and was the reason why his Temple was named after the red ants known as Swa which ate his stick came to be named Al'Aqswa
Why not quoting the complete verse of II Cro 3:1? "Then Solomon began to build the house of the LORD at Jerusalem in mount Moriah, where the LORD appeared unto David his father, in the place that David had prepared in the threshingfloor of Ornan the Jebusite. "
For all the doubters, explain where all the water came from for cleaning up after all the animal sacrifices.
Isaiah 2 -And it shall come to pass in the last days, that the mountain of the LORD'S house shall be established in the top of the mountains, and shall be exalted above the hills;
Sounds like the city of David will rise above the dome of the rock. Earthquake perhaps.
So exciting !!!!
Seems weird that they would've built the temple in a place undefendable during a siege rather than inside the walls of Zion. The City of David just makes more sense to me for all the reasons named as well as logistically.
3:13, old man has the wrong mindset for his culture, my god. xD
I think details are important. Yes the crusaders took of the crescent moon of this building on the temple mount. But what we know about the history of this location is highly debatable as well. It is clearly a Byzantine style and thereby Christian, building. People say it has been build by the first-Christians and then taken by the muslims. The design is the same as the dome of the Church of the Holy Sepulchre but it is on a higher ground and it is gold. And it has blasphemous lyrics from the quran on it.
And never forget, the crusades were a reaction on the (still on going) jihad of islam. There were nine crusades, but thousands of attacks of muslims on Christians, and it is still on going.
Let me prove how silly it is to say, that Solomon's Temple was not built
on the huge, almost flat plateau of Temple Mount, where some couple of
hundreds of thousands or more, of people, virtually the whole nation,
who were OBLIGED to come together every year, to attend at least one of
three important religious festivities, could congregate around God's
Temple.
You are trying to tell us, that, instead, Solomon has built the Temple
on the steep slopes of Mt Zion, where it was absolutely out of the
question, that those huge masses of people could congregate, plus those
money changers, and those who were selling sacrificial animals to those
thousands of pilgrims etc...
Apart from this, everybody knows, that when Solomon built the Temple,
more than 900 BC, the Romans did not even exist yet! Italy belonged to
Etruscans.
The very small city of Rome was only established some 200 years
(Allegedly 753 BC), about 200 years after Solomon built the Temple.
The Romans first arrived in Jerusalem in 64 BC, which means, that it was
long after the Second Temple was already standing for 500 years, on the
same spot of Solomon's Temple, which was destroyed by Babylonians in
about 567 BC.
And you are trying to make us believe, that the huge plateau of Temple
Mount, the place ideal to build the Temple, and accommodate hundreds of
thousands of pilgrims, gathered together for the national religious
festivities, was waiting empty for about 700 years, for the Romans, to
come and build there their fortress Antonia!
By the way, the fortress Antonia was not built by the Romans, but by
Herod the Great, just beyond the northern end of the Temple Mount
plateau, just adjacent to it, and it was called Baris! Only later, he
renamed it to Antonia, after Roman general Mark Antony.
Anyway, it is a complete nonsense to say that the Solomon's as well as
the Second Temple were built anywhere else, than on the Temple Mount.
Why, now, on the very spot of Solomon's Temple, stands Muslims' "Dome
of the Rock" and because of that's the Temple cannot ever be rebuilt, is
just another story, but the answer is obvious and is also in the
Bible.
look at all these people being deceived that its in the city of david...sad
I think you are right..
Fully agree Jerzi - Except 'The Dome' is on the peak of the mountain - not the flat Threshing Floor where building and sacrifice could be carried out. Plus The Dome is not in line with The Golden Gate and the Ascention Point on the Mount of Olives. So we don't need to remove the Dome to make Way for 'the temple'. Do we?
I find it odd, that Christians wanting/wishing/desirous for the rebuilding of the Jewish Third Temple would be so concerned as to where its location ought to be. After all, if Christians are hoping for this Temple to be rebuilt for the sole purpose of their Messiah to come back (which would induce the 'End of Days'), then having it built on Al-Aqsa or Haram al-Sharif or the City of David shouldn't matter, should it? After all, according to Revelations, Messiah can't/won't come back until all of humanity attempts to wipe itself out anyways, so shouldn't Christians be eager for this fight?
rebuilding the temple is blasphemy and christians who want it are idolators. jesus comes back to jerusalem on the mount of olives and destroys the city
Apparently mosques were aligned towards Petra before being aligned towards Mecca.
Temple Mount = Antonio Fortress
The prophet Micah writes; "Zion will be ploughed like a field, Jerusalem will become a heap of rubble. the temple hill a mound overgrown with thickets." (Micah @) Where are the thickets on the current site of the supposed Temple Mount? It is built on solid rock. The Temple Mount lies covered with thickets in the City of David and as yet has to be discovered. The Millennial Temple will be built in the City of David on the original site of the Temple, not where the Dome of the Rock Mosque is situated. @t
The Roman Fortress was on the "temple mount sight". It was the only place large enough to hold that many soldiers(& everything else involved with a Army). The Crusaders later built a church on this same location as they too occupied the Fortress. The Muslims, when they conquered Jerusalem took over that crusader church, The Fort & established a Victory Mosque(Still there today) . The Temple is in Zion/CityofDavid, near the spring. Josephus gives the location. Id say the jews are just being greedy but that would be anti-semitic....
Finally, truth published.
Romans 3:3-5
3 For what if some did not believe? Will their unbelief make the faithfulness of God without effect? 4 Certainly not! Indeed, let God be true but every man a liar. As it is written:
“That You may be justified in Your words,
And may overcome when You are judged.”
Before concluding the Ophel was where the Temple stood please watch this: ua-cam.com/video/l-k38U1-HLY/v-deo.html
Lorraine Green: Namecalling coupled with the logical fallacies of attributing to the Jews construction endeavors they never undertook, plus implying that Cornuke's lie that the entire 10th legion was there is true is not a rebuttal.
Take the SCALES oFF , Rebuild the LAST TEMPLE NOW over the GIHON SPRING, this Film is TRUE
It's kind of stuped to think that Solomon would build his timple down in a hole an then call it Mount.... Zion
Agreed Charles de Gaul. It's kind a stupid - but then "That's people"
Interesting.
BINGO!
Just go google this article out of Israel these days >>>
King David’s Jerusalem Wasn’t Where We Thought, New Study Argues
Matthew 24:1-2...not one stone will be left upon another.
I agree that the Wailing wall is not a part of any temple but where does the Bible mention that it was in the City of David as presented here?
The Bible clearly states that the temple stood on Mt. Moriah which we know as the temple mount area. Jewish historians and others agree with scripture. Mt. Moriah was not in the old city of David but further north. Refer to Derek Walker and Michael Rood on the subject. Cornuke is presenting flimsy evidence basing it on Earnest Martin's claims and neither are correct.
"they will say no more, ‘The ark of the covenant of the Lord.’ It shall not come to mind,
nor shall they remember it, nor shall they visit it, nor shall it be made anymore." [Jeremiah 3:16]
ANYONE OUT THERE IN THE DIGITAL REALM WHO CAN POINT OUT ANY SCRIPTURE VERSE/S THAT PUTS THIS INTO A TIME FRAME? (after the 3rd temple is destroyed maybe?)
"“Then it shall come to pass, when you are multiplied and increased in the land in those days,” says the Lord, “that they will say no more, ‘The ark of the covenant of the Lord.’ It shall not come to mind, nor shall they remember it, nor shall they visit it, nor shall it be made anymore.
Maybe the building it on the Temple Mount will be the abomination of desolation!
It was Dr. Ernest L Martin Ph. D. who wrote the book "The Temples that Jerusalem forgot" by ASK Publications, in 2000, that really got me interested about the true location of the Temple. This video by Robert Cornuke really makes this subject come alive as never before. This is a first class production that should be viewed by the whole world. NO MORE GAMES FOLKS! It takes courage to show people the truth, verses tradition. Robert does just that. I was told years ago by a friend that, the best place to hide something is, right under a persons nose. And here in Jerusalem is evidence right under the peoples nose, and they don't get it - - yet! I hope the blinders come off peoples eyes soon and the whole world finally gets it. In closing, great production, and I hope more people see this video.
I have news for them the two witnesses will tell them where it was built
What did the Roman historian Tacitus say about a "spring of never-failing water" at the temple in section 12 below?
The Jews
Book Five (1-13) of The Histories by Tacitus
11. So after encamping, as I have said, before the walls of Jerusalem, he paraded his legions in formation before the eyes of the enemy. The Jews, marshalled close under their walls, were in a position to venture further out if they were successful and had a place of refuge ready at hand in case of defeat. Titus sent against them cavalry and some cohorts in battle order, but the encounter was indecisive. Then the enemy gave ground, and for some days thereafter fought a succession of engagements just in front of the gates. Finally, repeated losses drove them behind the walls. The Romans then concentrated on an assault. After all, it seemed beneath them to wait for hunger to do its work on the enemy, and the troops actually asked to be allowed to risk their lives. Some did so because they had real courage, many from mere bravado and a desire for rewards. As for Titus, his imagination dwelt on Rome, wealth and pleasure: it would be long before these dreams were realized if Jerusalem were destined not to fall in the immediate future.
But the city occupied a commanding position, and it had been reinforced by engineering works so massive that they might have rendered even a flat site impregnable. Two lofty hills were enclosed by walls skilfully staggered and forming re-entrant angles designed to expose the flank of an attacker. At the edge of the crags was a sharp drop, and a series of towers dominated the scene, 105 feet high where the rising ground helped, and 135 or 120 feet high on the lower contours. (19) These presented an impressive appearance, and to the distant observer seemed to be on a level. There were further walls inside around the palace, and a conspicuous landmark was the lofty castle of Antonia, so named by Herod in honour of Mark Antony.
12. The Temple was like a citadel and had its own walls, which had been even more laboriously and skilfully constructed than the rest. The porticoes around it constituted in themselves an excellent defensive position. To these advantages must be added a spring of never-failing water, chambers cut in the living rock, and tanks and cisterns for the storage of rainwater. Its builders had foreseen only too well that the strange practices of the Jews would lead to continual fighting. Hence everything was available for a siege, however long. Moreover, after Pompey's capture of Jerusalem, fear and experience taught them many lessons. So taking advantage of the money-grubbing instincts of the Claudian period, they purchased permission to fortify the city, and in the days of peace built walls meant for war. Already the home of a motley concourse, its population had been swollen by the fall of the other Jewish cities, for the most determined partisan leaders escaped to the capital, and thereby added to the turmoil. There were three different leaders and three armies. The long outer perimeter of the walls was held by Simon, the central part of the city by John, and the Temple by Eleazar. John and Simon could rely on numbers and equipment, Eleazar on his strategic position. But it was upon each other that they turned the weapons of battle, ambush and fire, and great stocks of corn went up in flames. Then John sent off a party of men, ostensibly to offer sacrifice but in reality to cut Eleazar and his followers to pieces, thus gaining possession of the Temple. Hence-forward, therefore, Jerusalem was divided between two factions, until, on the approach of the Romans, fighting the foreigner healed the breach between them.
13. Prodigies had occurred, but their expiation by the offering of victims or solemn vows is held to be unlawful by a nation which is the slave of superstition and the enemy of true beliefs. In the sky appeared a vision of armies in conflict, of glittering armour. A sudden lightning flash from the clouds lit up the Temple. The doors of the holy place abruptly opened, a superhuman voice was heard to declare that the gods were leaving it, and in the same instant came the rushing tumult of their departure. Few people placed a sinister interpretation upon this. The majority were convinced that the ancient scriptures of their priests alluded to the present as the very time when the Orient would triumph and from Judaea would go forth men destined to rule the world. This mysterious prophecy really referred to Vespasian and Titus, but the common people, true to the selfish ambitions of mankind, thought that this mighty destiny was reserved for them, and not even their calamities opened their eyes to the truth.
We are told that the number of the besieged, old and young, men and women, amounted to 600,000. All who could bear arms did so, and more than their numbers warranted had the courage necessary. They displayed an inflexible determination, women no less than men, and the thought that they might be compelled to leave their home made them more afraid of living than of dying.
This, then, was the city and nation which Titus faced. Since a headlong assault and the element of surprise were ruled out by the lie of the ground, he proposed to employ earthworks and mantlets. Each legion had its allotted task, and there was a lull in the fighting while they pushed on with the construction of every conceivable device for storming Cities, whether invented long ago or due to the ingenuity of modern times.
They won't be here when the 2 witnesses appear.
The two witness already do.....they are the old and new testaments of the Bible.
@@whoelseeverdiedforyou1737 nope. I believe the 2 Witnesses are the Word of God and the People Of God. BOTH of which the AntiChrist Roman Emperors tried to wipe out, and BOTH of which came back to life!
They already have! The 2 Witnesses are the Word of God and the People Of God. 🙌🏼
Great presentation. The work of Bob Cornuke and others on this topic confirms the prior research of Ernest L. Martin who also came to the same conclusion re the location of the Temple.
False! Cornuke has only borrowed from Martin's work to support his own fractured claims and both men are wrong. Both have misquoted the Bible and historians and ignored professional archaeologists who have lived in Israel and work there for years. Martin and Cornuke are only giving a false easy answer to an age old dilemma. The scriptures, Historians and archaeology have proven that the temples stood on what we know as the temple mount area known as Mt. Moriah. It is a falsehood to place all that God commanded in regard to Mt. Moriah as happening in the old city of David. You can also refer to Derek Walker and Michael Rood who shed viable light on the issue.
Minniebell , you’re right. Just see the collection of verses from the scriptures which I have posted in my public comment. Cornuke is carried away by a misunderstanding of the word Zion, which actually in many places denote the character of God as a spiritual dwelling place.
MInniebell, Cornuke merely built upon Martin's work much like say Albert Einstein built upon Newton's scientific ideas.
Before concluding the Ophel was where the Temple stood please watch this: ua-cam.com/video/l-k38U1-HLY/v-deo.html
If we believe God’s word that no stones would be left standing from the temple as if it never existed then why do the foundation walls (Western Wall) still stand? The City of David truly gives pause for thought.
Fascinating. Great job. Excellent work.
its the stupid crusades all over again. Only the weapons are exponentially far more devastating. You stupid stupid people. :(
Just started watching... im excited to see this! I believe, you may be correct! Matt 24 is accurate!! Thank you so much for making this video! Maranatha! He's coming!
ToriMichele Morris Well according to 2 Chronicles 3:1 Solomon build the temple on Mount Moriah which is located in Jerusalem
MARANATHA!
Who cares what the world thinks?! Keep the commandments of the God of Israel and do what he says! You think God would be ok with a "dome of Baal" right next to his temple?! No, repent, and do as the Lord says.
Col 2:8 Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition of men, after the rudiments of the world, and not after Christ.
It is no doubt thru philosophy and traditions of men many have been blinded to simple truth. The Bible is the final authority and is forever settled in heaven. I think it is good to search for these buried truths however our main focus should not be on any 3rd temple, for the body of Jesus His eklessia is the 3rd temple. His Spirit dwells in man and not in man made buildings.
1Co 3:16 Know ye not that ye are the temple of God, and that the Spirit of God dwelleth in you?
Act 7:48 Howbeit the most High dwelleth not in temples made with hands; as saith the prophet,
Act 17:24 God that made the world and all things therein, seeing that he is Lord of heaven and earth, dwelleth not in temples made with hands;
Yes. ANTICHRIST dwells in temples made with hands.
Where did we hear this before? Traditions was the wise Leaders of the Temple stumbling stone. Giving ordinary believers all these man made rules & Traditions. Jesus told them that they were too tied up with traditions, & that hindered them from understanding his coming as prophesied all over the Torah. When someone puts anything above the Torah, then there is confusion & a loss of blessings. Twelve Apostles were picked for a reason. Very much explained in the new Testament. "Strangers will sit at Abrahams Table", & "they will take your place".
The third Temple will be built as prophesied in Daniel. Antichirst will reign from there, until Jesus returns to judge all. Jesus was a Priest & a King. First coming was a priest, Second Coming will be as a King.
We welcome all our Jewish Brothers & Sisters to join in worship, as our Jewish Messiah rules all the earth.
A true Monarchy established on Earth, once & for all.
And we all said AMEN!!!
So true! AMEN!
The enemy is the father of all lies. He struggles to suppress the truth. That is how still there are peoples who don't believe in the Messiah, Yeshua, Jesus Christ.
It grieves me to reveal this, but at the 16:18-17:26 mark of this video, Bob says the Ark of the Covenant was taken out from the City of David for a festival and then taken back into the City of David. This is a total twisting and misleading of what Scripture says. Scripture actually says that after Solomon built the temple, he would bring up the Ark of the Covenant out of the City of David to the temple on Mt. Moriah.
2 Chronicles 5:2: "Then Solomon assembled to Jerusalem the elders of Israel and all the heads of the tribes, the leaders of the fathers’ households of the sons of Israel, to bring up the ark of the covenant of the Lord out of the City of David, which is Zion."
Then from this point on, the Ark of the Covenant would reside permanently in the temple that Solomon built, which is also referred to as the house of the Lord.
2 Chronicles 6:10-11 Solomon states: “Now the Lord has fulfilled His word which He spoke; for I have risen in place of my father David and sit on the throne of Israel, as the Lord [e]promised, and have built the house for the name of the Lord, the God of Israel. 11 There I have placed the ark in which is the covenant of the Lord, which He made with the sons of Israel.”
Please read 1 Kings chapters 7 and 8, and 2 Chronicles 4 and 5 to see for yourself that the Ark of the Covenant was taken out of the City of David and permanently placed in the temple of Solomon. Also, at the 26:43 mark of this video, when quoting 2 Chronicles 3:1, they leave out, "on Mt. Moriah." Nowhere in Scripture is the City of David referred to as Mt. Moriah. It appears they have left this part of the verse out because it doesn't fit with their theory. While they claim to be biblical, they actually twist and omit Scripture. They will give an account one day before the Lord for misleading people by twisting God's Word.
Amazing that people refuse to believe that the western wall is part of the Roman Fort. Josephus stated that after Jerusalem was destroyed and that the soldiers dug up even the very foundations of the Temple looking for the melted gold that had seeped into the crevices of the rocks and that all that was left was rubble that you would never had known that a city once stood there.
Roman troops broke into the city via the northern wall of their fort and fought through to the causeway and broke down the walls into the Temple which they totally flattened and every house of the citizenry. Fort Antonia was the only structure left standing.
You deniers should rejoice in this because it means that when archeologist finally locate the exact location of the Temple in the old City they will have the place to build the Temple again without touching the Islamic site.
It was in 2004 when archeologists finally located the true site of the pool of Siloam, after many years of believing it was at another location.
I was Just there, iv'e seen all these digs. and more is being uncovered by the day. They will find this evidence if they continue. Even though The Word of God expresses the truth, Jews always demand a sign and they will get one soon.
@@Madigan0895 Madigan, be realistic. They won't find anything, because the Temple (even it had existed) was simply NOT there.
@@janverboven If its not there, where do you think it is ?
@@viking670 From what I've learned (I'm not going to repeat everything) and got from decent sources (and not death sea scrolls) it was certainly NOT inside/under Fort Antonia, IF there was a last temple to be destroyed (Titus - Josephus 70 AD), it would have been rather small and OUTSIDE the fort.
@@Madigan0895 They demand a sign? That makes them bigger than God?
God is a slave to their whims? Really now. Give your head a good shake.
If we use the Bible as our ultimate authority, it tells us clearly that the temple was not in the City of David, but upon Mt. Moriah, where the Temple Mount is today.
David purchased the threshing floor from Araunah, the Jebusite
2 Samuel 24:24-25: However, the king said to Araunah, “No, but I will certainly buy it from you for a price; for I will not offer burnt offerings to the Lord my God that cost me nothing.” So David bought the threshing floor and the oxen for fifty shekels of silver. 25 Then David built there an altar to the Lord, and he offered burnt offerings and peace offerings. And the Lord responded to prayer for the land, and the plague was withdrawn from Israel.
The Temple Solomon built was on Mt. Moriah. The City of David is not Mt. Moriah.
2 Chronicles 3:1-2: Then Solomon began to build the house of the Lord in Jerusalem on Mount Moriah, where the Lord had appeared to his father David, at the place that David had prepared on the threshing floor of Ornan the Jebusite. 2 He began to build on the second day in the second month of the fourth year of his reign.
After Solomon built the temple, then he would bring up the Ark of the Covenant out of the City of David to the temple on Mt. Moriah.
2 Chronicles 5:2: "Then Solomon assembled to Jerusalem the elders of Israel and all the heads of the tribes, the leaders of the fathers’ households of the sons of Israel, to bring up the ark of the covenant of the Lord out of the City of David, which is Zion."
Then from this point on, the Ark of the Covenant would reside permanently in the temple that Solomon built, which is also referred to as the house of the Lord.
2 Chronicles 6:10-11 Solomon states: “Now the Lord has fulfilled His word which He spoke; for I have risen in place of my father David and sit on the throne of Israel, as the Lord [e]promised, and have built the house for the name of the Lord, the God of Israel. 11 There I have placed the ark in which is the covenant of the Lord, which He made with the sons of Israel.”
These verses clearly state that the Ark of the Covenant was brought out of the City of David to be placed permanently in the House of the Lord that Solomon built upon Mt. Moriah.
Do you really think the Romans would allow the Temple above or equal to their for?
No their fort would tower over the temple to show who was the boss and king.
If this is true, I believe God is making the way for the return of His Son. I trust the Word of God, no matter man's traditions.
i concur with you.
God,
God's decision is final so let's just prepare for His comimg
Search for Ahmad Deedat
Before concluding the Ophel was where the Temple stood please watch this: ua-cam.com/video/l-k38U1-HLY/v-deo.html
READ ISAIAH 66:1
ACTS 7:48 /17:24-26
1COR 3:16/6:19
Eph 2:21_22
The church is the ROC(YESHUA)MADE OF LIVING STONE, BUILT BY HIMSELF.THAT THE ENNEMI CANNOT DESTROY!GOD DOES NOT LIVE IN MANMADE TEMPLE.
Many facts have been disregarded for this video., for example:
The many Mikva’s located outside of the south wall of the temple.
The mikva’s beside the westernwall in the tunnels. Obviously there was water irrigation beside the Gihon spring. Not to mention water even on the other side (north) of the temple in the pool of the Bethesda
Second the excavations in the large parking lot in the site of the city of David have found Roman courtyards and homes. Which is basically in the spot of your renderings of the temple. That’s a large spot of land in a relatively small space to begin with.
Then what about the discovery of the pilgrim road that was recently discovered at the base of the city of David. You know, by the Pool of Siloam... Where does it lead??? The Temple Mount. The gutter underneath the road connects to the bottom. Not to some new place for the temple.
What the threshing floor?? Why would David buy a piece of property inside the city walls of a city he’s conquered??? I mean we’re taking about 9 - 12 acres top. He would have already owned that land. But the area of the Temple Mount was outside of his City, making a lot more since.
Last, what about the excavation of the Solomons gates at Ophel?? Just outside of where?? The Southern wall of the Temple Mount. The direction of his gates direct you where??? The Temple Mount. The OPPOSITE direction of the City of David.
Amen Joel - a good catalogue of Facts. I'm often finding that people are really not interested in Facts. But the prophet Joel said this, "In the last days, I will pour out My Spirit on all flesh, and your sons and daughters will prophecy, and your old men shall dream dreams."
"You are Jew? I have no time to lose with you" - --- - sad to see people having learned nothing from their own terrible history.
God himself called them a "stiffnecked people" . That has been a saving thing gave them their determination to survive But as most realize it is detrimental to them changing their "traditions" that's why WE have to stir them to jealousy. As I know you well know.
what is Ironic is that they believed the Christian crusaders said it was the temple of god in the 11th century but now has not time to lose with you now.
John Grybakk, What's so strange is that these idiots hate those who practice the religion of their savior. The Bible is clear on one thing - Jesus was an observant, Orthodox Jew and never thought of starting a new religion. He said repeatedly that the most important thing was attitude to god and the Jewish Law. (I heard a nutty preacher the other day say Jesus didn't mean it - LOLOL)
smb12321 JESUS SAID THE MOST IMPORTANT THING WAS TO BELIEVE IN WHOM GOD HAS SENT!!
Because they not the Real Jews
www.evernote.com/shard/s421/sh/ba358b08-2ea2-4f63-a8f4-b1297fb0c84b/b22ed69ae2bc1638f01838078e8dd18f
BELIEVE THE SCRIPTURES NOT TRADITION
Believe our SAVIOUR he said the Temple was the House of the LORD! And ALL history says it was on the same Temple mount of our days.
How can anything be a higher Authority than YAHSHUA Hamashiach. This is nothing but a distraction. Our SAVIOUR taught the we, the saints, are the Temple. Read you Bibles and lean not on the way of man for your understanding. Trust in the Holy Spirit, for HE will teach you all things! Those are the words of our Saviour.
You admit this is the Temple from the days of our SAVIOUR. Our SAVIOUR referred to it as the HOUSE OF THE MOST HIGH. Now, you lowly and sinful man wish to correct our SAVIOUR! Shame on you for distracting and confusing the new to salvation! Quit wasting your time and start witnessing about the Gospel!
@@dwh5512 Not ALL history! Josephus contradicts this modern idea as do other ancients. Who would know better what happened back then, eyewitnesses or modern people?
*Believe this scripture:*
2 Chronicles 3:1
_"Then Solomon began to build the temple of the LORD in Jerusalem on _*_Mount Moriah_*_ ..."_
This is absolutely fascinating... I believe the Scriptures, and I believe this!
What did Roman historian Tacitus say about a "spring of never-failing water" at the temple in section 12 below?
He was a teenager when the temple was destroyed during 70AD.
The Jews
Book Five (1-13) of The Histories by Tacitus
11. So after encamping, as I have said, before the walls of Jerusalem, he paraded his legions in formation before the eyes of the enemy. The Jews, marshalled close under their walls, were in a position to venture further out if they were successful and had a place of refuge ready at hand in case of defeat. Titus sent against them cavalry and some cohorts in battle order, but the encounter was indecisive. Then the enemy gave ground, and for some days thereafter fought a succession of engagements just in front of the gates. Finally, repeated losses drove them behind the walls. The Romans then concentrated on an assault. After all, it seemed beneath them to wait for hunger to do its work on the enemy, and the troops actually asked to be allowed to risk their lives. Some did so because they had real courage, many from mere bravado and a desire for rewards. As for Titus, his imagination dwelt on Rome, wealth and pleasure: it would be long before these dreams were realized if Jerusalem were destined not to fall in the immediate future.
But the city occupied a commanding position, and it had been reinforced by engineering works so massive that they might have rendered even a flat site impregnable. Two lofty hills were enclosed by walls skilfully staggered and forming re-entrant angles designed to expose the flank of an attacker. At the edge of the crags was a sharp drop, and a series of towers dominated the scene, 105 feet high where the rising ground helped, and 135 or 120 feet high on the lower contours. (19) These presented an impressive appearance, and to the distant observer seemed to be on a level. There were further walls inside around the palace, and a conspicuous landmark was the lofty castle of Antonia, so named by Herod in honour of Mark Antony.
12. The Temple was like a citadel and had its own walls, which had been even more laboriously and skilfully constructed than the rest. The porticoes around it constituted in themselves an excellent defensive position. To these advantages must be added a spring of never-failing water, chambers cut in the living rock, and tanks and cisterns for the storage of rainwater. Its builders had foreseen only too well that the strange practices of the Jews would lead to continual fighting. Hence everything was available for a siege, however long. Moreover, after Pompey's capture of Jerusalem, fear and experience taught them many lessons. So taking advantage of the money-grubbing instincts of the Claudian period, they purchased permission to fortify the city, and in the days of peace built walls meant for war. Already the home of a motley concourse, its population had been swollen by the fall of the other Jewish cities, for the most determined partisan leaders escaped to the capital, and thereby added to the turmoil. There were three different leaders and three armies. The long outer perimeter of the walls was held by Simon, the central part of the city by John, and the Temple by Eleazar. John and Simon could rely on numbers and equipment, Eleazar on his strategic position. But it was upon each other that they turned the weapons of battle, ambush and fire, and great stocks of corn went up in flames. Then John sent off a party of men, ostensibly to offer sacrifice but in reality to cut Eleazar and his followers to pieces, thus gaining possession of the Temple. Hence-forward, therefore, Jerusalem was divided between two factions, until, on the approach of the Romans, fighting the foreigner healed the breach between them.
This video misled the information regarding the Temple on the basis of the Gihon Spring which was a strong hypothesis of the speakers or the chief narrator of this video. If we read the Bible carefully in 2 Chronicles 3:1 it was clearly mentioned that Solomon began to build the House of the LORD in Jerusalem on Mount Moriah (hammoriyyah in Hebrew).
The Gihon Spring is on the southern slope of Mt Moriah
I just love these videos...I learn so much about my Lord & Savior...Please make more!
New to this sight. THIS is amazing! It makes so much more sense and lines up beautifully. Thank you for sharing! BIG THUMBS UP!!!
Michele Bryant oh wow. are you new to k-house? it's incredible. it's the best place to learn intellectually about our faith. " cosmic codes" is one of the most profound books you'll ever read
Hi Ben! Yes, so happy to have found this site! Thanks for the recommendation. I will check out "Cosmic Codes" Very much appreciate the recommendation. This site has re-kindled a fire!
Michele Bryant wow I'm jealous! it's not easy, after k-house, to get fed intellectually and spiritually. I remember first reading the small magazine my Dad got ("update") and even with post graduate degree I was blown away
Before concluding the Ophel was where the Temple stood please watch this: ua-cam.com/video/l-k38U1-HLY/v-deo.html
Fantastic video! Keep these coming. God says what he means and means what he says.
Bev Sivert So true! GOD'S WORD stays the same, HE NEVER changes, HE is the same YESTERDAY, TODAY & FOREVERMORE! 🤓❤💯👑👑👑
AMEN!
Before concluding the Ophel was where the Temple stood please watch this: ua-cam.com/video/l-k38U1-HLY/v-deo.html
I find this so exciting.....the evidence seems conclusive.....thanks for posting.
We are too intelligent that makes us arrogant. Pure heart and simple soul is needed to believe.
Nice thought. Remember what Paul told the Corinthians "Has not God made foolish the wisdom of this world? Read the whole context (1Cor. 1:18 -29) And one must admit, there is a lot of foolishness in this world.
This speaks volumes to me!
“If we’re ever going to find the Temple, I think we’re going to have to use the Bible, and the Bible is telling me that the Temple HAS To be in the City of David, In the Strong Hold of Zion, and the luring pole of Oral Traditions needs to be ignored.”
Yes we open bible and more often we open Quran and guess what.. we get answers and further knowledge of what is going to happen under the final days signs. Prophet Essa (jesus) and Imam Mehdi would be resurrected. And Dajjal (third eye) would be unveiled.. and truth will be revealed! That there is Only One God!
Rabia Sadaf why do you call anti christ “the third eye”
WAIT! Does Micah say "'Mountain' of the temple"? Catch that? "Mountain". I see a high place NEXT to the City of David. It is the only geographical feature in the area that could be called a mountain, certainly not the City of David.
Micah certainly does not support Mr. Cornuke's theory.
Also, who's to say that what we refer to now as the Temple Mount was not regarded as being a part of the City of David and Jerusalem and Zion when the temples existed.
Uh-oh, 1 Kings 8:1 "bring up the ark of the Lord’s covenant from Zion, the City of David." "Bring up"....where? Into the temple. Based on 1 Kings 8, the The temple is "UP" from the City of David". Again, not a good verse to support his theory.
Reading ALL of 1 Kings 8 it is clear that the festival and dedication and sacrifices were all performed in the same area that Mr. Cornuke proclaims had to be a very large area; too large to have been in The City of David, His own admission. The end of this chapter finishes with
"On the following day he sent the people away. They blessed the king and then went home, joyful and glad in heart for all the good things the Lord had done for his servant David and his people Israel" 1 Kings 8:66.
Did you watch the whole video? They talked about 1 Kings 8:1 at 6:23 and answered that point before you made it.
Regarding "Mountain" in Micah, it doesn't say "summit of the mountain". Furthermore, the city of David was called "Mount Zion". Micah 4:2 even uses "Mountain of the LORD" and "Zion" interchangeably.
In short, the passages that you pointed out do NOT support your notion.
@@aChristian4RonPaul The Bible's pretty obvious unless someone is looking to establish something other than what it actually indicates, however, all one has to do is muddle up verses, cause a bit of confusion and insert one's own answer to a question that he/she created.
I suggest you read 1 Kings 8:8 to help clear things up. It describes how things were "to this day" - AFTER the furnishings were brought "UP" from the City Of David and placed into the Temple.
@@tonekenny5225 Verse 8 is AFTER verse 6 when it says, "Then the priests brought the ark of the LORD to its place"
Wasn't aware that only a summit can be called a mount. Lol
Micah’s prophecy is set in the Messianic Age, when the topography of Israel will be different. The area from Geba to Rimmon will become a plain. The Mount of Olives will be split in two by an earthquake as Messiah’s feet touches it. Jerusalem most likely will be pushed up above its present location , thus a higher mountain on which Ezekiel’s Temple will be built.
But in all version in the bible I found it clearly says 2 chron. 3,1 on mount moriah. So what are you talking about??
I don't know where it's going to be but God will dwell among his people's.
You can be on a mountain with one step. Teresa Evans
PRIDE before the fall .. did u see the pride of men in this video
Their pride made the lose city in the first place if you know the true history
Some valid points. Something tells me I'll be examining all of this in more detail.
The TEMPLE also Served as a BANK, when it BURNED the GOLD MELTED and Run thru the Cracks, the Roman tore down the Stones to get the GOLD
This theory makes complete sense, especially when taken into account their data. So the Temple was in the City of David Yes, the Temple was in Zion Yes, the Temple was on mount Moriah yes at the lower slope, connecting to David's City at the Ophel and the area that would be in the area of Orlan's threshing floor. Tick tick tick.
Didn't Josephus write that the sanctuary of the temple, the east gate and the summit of the mount of olives all lined up perfectly east to west? That would seem to contradict this theory?
The Eastern Gate which is there today was built in the 5th or 6th century, and not there at the time of Temple. Any Biblical references (or those by Josephus) to an Eastern Gate would therefore be speaking of something which existed prior to the current gate, the exact location of which would be speculative.
@@jimalexander687 How would it be speculative in Josephus' case, since he was alive before and after it's destruction?
@@Gutslinger I didn't say Josephus was speculative. I said the exact location of that about which Josephus was speaking can only be speculative, as the gate which stands there today was built five or six hundred years *after* the gate which Josephus described. We have no way of knowing whether the present gate was built on the same location of the previous gate, which had been gone for half a millennia before the current gate was built.
Spot on Kotic1033. You can even see it from the Lutheran Tower that he spoke from. I've been there - tremendous panoramas. Well worth the climb of about 117 steps. It's all about "Being Inline With The Word of God"
This is a major great discovery but Ron Wyatt's discoveries are the greatest ever made, it's so sad that most people don't know about his work!
And for some strange reason, Cornuke has always seemed to be reluctant to give the credit and recognition to Ron that Ron deserves. I find that dissatisfying to say the least.
Ron Wyatt is a fraud. He have zero evidence. Exactly as you said Ron Wyatt is the greatest archeologist of all time, he found more than anybody else and his findings are more important than other's. Except he have exactly zero evidence and his story lack logic.
@@francisbusa1074 Because Ron Wyatt is a fraud. Everybody who give credit to him discredit himself.
Wow! Amazing historical finding.
It's now revealed as per Bible prophecy.
The time is now !
Maranatha! Look up for our redemption draws nigh.
💯🙌🙌🙌🙌🙌🙌🙌
Jews have been praying to a Roman fort for a very long time LMAO. Mark Antony trolling hard from the grave.
great video! May we keep in mind that ANYONE who builds a 3rd temple will be doing so for the antiChrist to stand in the midst and declare himself to be God, not for Messiah. A temple will be built. We should take no part in helping that along. shalom
Suzan Holland ...agreed, ....I see the parable of a fool building a house as symbolic of that false temple
John Eli How could it not be holy if the abomonation of desolation can stand in the holy place? Matt 24:15, Mark 13:14 and 2 Thess 2:1-4 and Rev 11:1-2
Interesting point ... ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Read Zechariah ch. 14. The millennial reign of True Messiah will be at this Temple Mount.
Suzan Holland the Pope has already done that!!!
Google the Northern Cross by Aquilla Fleetwood, youtube!
Fascinating! I certainly believe we are in the end times, and there is nothing hid that will not be shown. I used to believe the Bible was contradictory, but with further study over the years, I find it is not contradictory at all, but is, as our Heavenly Father intended, a true story that leads us straight to Him!!!
Ahmein
Josephus had acted as a mediator for the Romans and, when negotiations failed, witnessed the siege and aftermath. He wrote:
Now as soon as the army had no more people to slay or to plunder, because there remained none to be the objects of their fury (for they would not have spared any, had there remained any other work to be done), [Titus] Caesar gave orders that they should now demolish the entire city and Temple, but should leave as many of the towers standing as they were of the greatest eminence; that is, Phasaelus, and Hippicus, and Mariamne; and so much of the wall enclosed the city on the west side. This wall was spared, in order to afford a camp for such as were to lie in garrison [in the Upper City], as were the towers [the three forts] also spared, in order to demonstrate to posterity what kind of city it was, and how well fortified, which the Roman valor had subdued; but for all the rest of the wall [surrounding Jerusalem], it was so thoroughly laid even with the ground
Well spotted Sir. He was a Witness - and although the Readings are long - they are well worth toiling through.
it is also interesting to note in matthew 24:1-2 Jesus says "not a stone will be left upon another", looking at the western wall, these stones are clearly still upon one another. Therefore the city of david (where there is no appearance of walls/stacked stones) fits this description, and what is considered the temple mount by most, does not.
He hides it from the wise and proud and reveals it to the pure in heart. The Prophet Messiah Christ said not one stone left. Simple.
Its such an interesting statement that at the time seemed dramatic but now seems (is) prophetic. Why make that statement in the way He did. He is accountable to all His creation to be exactly right in His judgment. And we will be judged on what He has revealed.
Some BS , The Temple Had a Water Source , There's only one Water Source , Do Not get the Place you rebuild Wrong , and the Lord God Said He No Longer Needs your burnt Offerings , The Masiha was Christ who has come and Gone already but is to return , Do Not be a Backward People :( है।🙏💐 QC
Amen Charlie. The Temple had two Water sources (I've seen them on tours). One, the North End was cut off during the Herodian extention and rebuild.
Thanks for your insight and research. Wish I could visit the City of David and the Gihon spring, the true site of the temple. As a kid I always wondered about the western wall and Jesus prophecy of no stone left upon another. Now I know the truth.
When you open your heart to the world and love everything God has created The same way you love yourself God will open the heaven for you King David 7🔯שלום
Hand slaps forehead.....Of course it is in the City of David!!!!! This is brilliant!
The "renown biblical archaeologists" the revisionists rely upon to assert such drivel (Ernst Martin was a meteorologist who knew nothing about academic archeology and the same goes for Robert Cornuke) clearly have not studied Charles Warren, Eilat Mazar, Conrad Schick, Barclay and Willson. Dr. Martin's theory was disproved by the experts already in the early 1990's.
The Giḥon spring only fed the residents' needs for water. Conversely, multiple cisterns and water sources are found on the Temple Mount. The Temple Mount has over 20 cisterns and conduits which were plenty of water for the services (I have seen for myself their capped openings on Har haBayit) . One cistern could hold over 2 million gallons and another around 700,000 gallons. This is verified history.On top of this, Jewish records show that there was an aqueduct that brought water in abundance to the Temple Mt. from the Pools of Solomon at Etan near Bethlehem (not to be confused with the aqueduct that Pilot later built). Cornuke and his ilk really do not know what they are talking about.
The building of the Ophel south of the wall was actually the Akra which was built by Antiochus IV and destroyed by Shimon the Macabee. The City of David is not wide enough to place the 740 x 740 feet that made the 500 x 500 cubits of Temple Mt.
Bad scholarship by these people using Ernest Martin's book which was discredited a while back.
Ernest Martin is not a credible resource but Dr Benjamin Mazar, Dr. Eilat Mazar, Captain Charles Warren, Conrad Schick, Lee Ritmeyer and others are, and they all agree Mt. Moriah is the Temple Mount. By the way, the Fort of Antonia was around 40 cubits high on a high ground. The 10th legion only came to Jerusalem after the siege of Jerusalem and a cohort is 500-600 soldiers. According to Josephus the Antonia fortress was razed to the ground by the Romans in order to access the Temple Mt during the destruction of the 2nd Temple. This is only one of many points that I can give to why Dr. Martin's theory can not hold water and why Bob Cornuke is fooling thousands of gullible people like them, who do not know any better.
The headquarters for the Roman soldiers was in Caesarea by the sea. The Antonia was not new, it was a fort that was constructed by Solomon and then rebuilt by Nehemia and called the Baris. Herod later expanded the area by filling in the fosse found on the north of the Temple and it was according to Josephus 60 feet deep and 250 wide as protection for the Temple from the north. Herod filled it up and expanded beyond the 500 cubits starting from the offset stone called the Persian stone from Nehemia's time.
The experts of the City of David excavations and around the Temple Mt., who work daily to reveal the history of ancient Jerusalem, have found nothing to date that suggests the Temple Mt. was the Antonia fortress.
Anyway, Herod expanded to the north, west and south and those are retaining walls which were not part of the biblical measurements.
By the way, no credible recognized archeologist says the Temple was south of the Temple Mount. For example, all these archaeologists from the 1800's and 1900's who had access to the site said the same thing about the Temple being on the Temple Mt.: DeVougue 1864, Ferguson 1878, Warren 1880, Conder 1884, Schick 1896, Watson 1896, Mommert 1903, Dalman 1909, Hollis 1934, Simons 1952, Vincent 1954, Ritmeyer 1985.
And Josephus must be studied in unity with the Mishnah, Tosefta and the works of Conrad Schick topographical work of the Temple Mount. Josephus whom Martin and Cornuke both falsely quote, never said the Temple was in the city of David nor did he ever say an entire legion of Roman soldiers and their hangers on was permanently living in Jerusalem. He used the word "Tema" which means a lesser amount. Cornuke also doctors excerpts from the Jewish Bible so that they fit the claims he attempts to hawk. He has even lied that Israeli archaeologist Eli Shoukrun claimed that the Holy Temples stood in the City of David, whereas Shoukrun insists on the traditional site's location.
The Jewish tradition about the Temple Mount's location boasts anecdotal contiguity since the early AD 70's. Evidently, Josephus was aware of Jews who had begun returning daily to the Mount a mere 2-3 days after the Holy Temple had been sacked. This presence continues among others through early rabbis who ascended to it and was punctuated only for a few years in the Bar-Kokhvah revolt of 132-135 AD until the Byzantine era, when Jews were permitted to go there only one day a year. It is then, intriguingly, in the 4th century, that two gentile authors attest to this Jewish presence and note how the Jews would come up to the giant Foundation Stone and brush it with oil. Daily Jewish presence is renewed during the Persian occupation of the early 7th century and shortly afterward with the Arab Muslim occupation of 638, a presence that was pretty uninterrupted until the First Crusade of 1099. To even suggest we Jews are so dumb that we managed to forget our holiest site along the way since the AD70 Destruction is preposterous and offensive; and utterly arrogant when stated by non-Jews. So this tradition is rock solid, and none of the Christians who attempt to defy it can provide convincing answers that bear scrutiny to the question of when the Jews forgot the supposed original site.
@@ZviJ1 we'll find out soon....
@bearcubs9497 LOL If this delusion helps you cope with reality, go for it. It has zero effect on us in Israel anyway.
@@ZviJ1 it most certainly does.
@@ZviJ1 God will have His temple built wherever He wills it. This is a good thing. I personally don't think the site will be the mount. I think it'll be built in Shiloh. As I said, we'll soon find out.