Fireworks At UN As Russia Vetoes Vote On Nuclear Weapons In Space; U.S. Asks ‘What’s Russia Hiding?’

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 24 кві 2024
  • On Wednesday, Russia vetoed a U.N. resolution, co-sponsored by the United States and Japan, urging nations to prevent a nuclear arms race in space. Russia criticized it as biased, singling out nuclear weapons while ignoring other armaments. The Security Council vote saw 13 in favor, Russia against, and China abstaining. The resolution aimed to prohibit the development or deployment of nuclear weapons and other mass destruction arms in space, in line with a 1967 treaty involving the U.S. and Russia, and stressed the importance of verification for compliance. Watch the full video to know more.
    INTERNATIONAL NEWS
    #unitednations #unsc #us #russia #china #putin #joebiden #unsecuritycouncil #nuclearweapons #arms #ammunation #latestnews #globalaffairs
    Hindustan Times Videos brings all the News for the Global Indian under one umbrella. We break down news from across the globe from the unique lens of a Rising India. Tune in for Explainers, Opinions, Analysis and a 360 degree view of big events in India and the World which impact your present and future.
    Follow the Hindustan Times Channel on WhatsApp for News Alerts, Top Stories and Editor picks. Join Us Today - www.bit.ly/3PQ4kSv
    Subscribe to the Hindustan Times YT channel and press the bell icon to get notified when we go live.
    Visit our website www.hindustantimes.com/
    Follow us on Twitter / httweets
    Follow us on Facebook / hindustantimes

КОМЕНТАРІ • 814

  • @ismaildiedericks9964
    @ismaildiedericks9964 9 днів тому +366

    Russia is right. Enough of this hypocrisy

    • @thewesternworld9695
      @thewesternworld9695 9 днів тому +1

      Two parties compete each other's their goals

    • @bagonza9593
      @bagonza9593 9 днів тому +6

      so its okay to deploy nuclear weapons in space.right?

    • @BenedictaLove
      @BenedictaLove 9 днів тому

      @@bagonza9593if that’s not okay how is using nuclear bombs okay ? Are you stupid ?

    • @barryallen6240
      @barryallen6240 9 днів тому

      @bagonza9593 would it be great if they continuously spy on you with their satellites? They are hiding this with their WMD resolution.

    • @constructiveeconomics6733
      @constructiveeconomics6733 9 днів тому +4

      Do not accept hypocrites who seemingly seek to have dominion over all realms of human spaces but will never accept that reality for themselves.

  • @Equal2u
    @Equal2u 9 днів тому +299

    The US should not always get what the wanted! Well done Russia!

    • @linkmeforfun
      @linkmeforfun 9 днів тому +10

      If the US thinks that it is okay to surround Russia's neighborhood with nuclear weapons, why would Russia think it is not hypocritical for the US to prevent nuclear weapons in space? In any case, the US has proven that Treaties and UN Resolutions are not worth the paper they are written on.

    • @vanpeters9751
      @vanpeters9751 9 днів тому +9

      as an american i agree

    • @niburu1508
      @niburu1508 9 днів тому

      They should be downgraded to the third world country they have become before they destroy thecworld

    • @turbitturbit2781
      @turbitturbit2781 9 днів тому

      Alien right

    • @JackBackman-rd1uw
      @JackBackman-rd1uw 9 днів тому +2

      @@linkmeforfun You say this like the US isn't capable of putting nuclear weapons in space lmao. Russia gets no advantage from this, the world just loses.

  • @user-xi1in8hf9c
    @user-xi1in8hf9c 9 днів тому +155

    if US uses veto against Palestinians,,,thence Russia has the right to veto,,,

    • @SonderDAzeX-nc6vg
      @SonderDAzeX-nc6vg 9 днів тому

      I mean, U.S and Russia both have veto power as permanent members.

    • @unreal4good367
      @unreal4good367 9 днів тому +7

      facts

    • @SonderDAzeX-nc6vg
      @SonderDAzeX-nc6vg 9 днів тому

      Well U.S and Russia are both Permanent members with Veto power. . . soo

    • @philipnyebaza9943
      @philipnyebaza9943 9 днів тому +8

      The two vetoes are in no way to be compared. The Russia-China amendment should have been more welcomed by all UN security members because it is more comprehensive. I guess then that the movers of the initial draft US and Japan were not in good faith. Why do they want any weapons at all in outer space? EYES ON YOU.

    • @Kobs23
      @Kobs23 9 днів тому +1

      @@philipnyebaza9943 Why not?

  • @user-ff1xf9ds7f
    @user-ff1xf9ds7f 9 днів тому +192

    GOOD MOVE RUSSIA WE ARE NOT THE PUPPETS OF THE WEST....

    • @NafoDato
      @NafoDato 9 днів тому

      This is a terrible move. Put aside your hatred and hubris for one second to understand this has implications for humanity, not just select countries.

  • @devacore477
    @devacore477 9 днів тому +38

    Congrats to Russia for standing up against the evil empire.

    • @wendelldig591
      @wendelldig591 9 днів тому +2

      Russian evil empire

    • @pisablavatsky-cb3dd
      @pisablavatsky-cb3dd 9 днів тому

      the fact is that if countries can place WMD in outer space, all will become equal coz today US is encircling Russia and china with placing nukes in its vassals states around both countries. If WMD is allowed in outer space, US advantage would become useless because distance of WMD from each countries will become equal which US wants to avoid. China and Russia should veto all kind of hidden agenda moves of nezi US

    • @BrakeDenzo
      @BrakeDenzo 6 днів тому

      ​@@wendelldig591everybody knows USA is an evil empire

  • @m.r.ansari2946
    @m.r.ansari2946 9 днів тому +233

    US wants every country on the planet Earth must be without WMD except US😂😂

    • @Riceoncodm
      @Riceoncodm 9 днів тому

      You’re an idiot if that’s what you think

    • @thewesternworld9695
      @thewesternworld9695 9 днів тому +9

      Third-world countries must choose between Russia interest or USA interest

    • @constructiveeconomics6733
      @constructiveeconomics6733 9 днів тому +12

      Do not accept hypocrites who seemingly seek to have dominion over all realms of human spaces but will never accept that reality for themselves.

    • @niburu1508
      @niburu1508 9 днів тому

      Owned by wealthy mental retards

    • @abduljaleel4467
      @abduljaleel4467 9 днів тому +17

      ​@@thewesternworld9695we choose russia

  • @ismailmookadam2612
    @ismailmookadam2612 9 днів тому +122

    US only wants WMDs not to be in space, but other weapons are ok.

    • @KenshinPhoenix
      @KenshinPhoenix 9 днів тому +4

      DEWs

    • @MuantanamoMobile
      @MuantanamoMobile 9 днів тому +4

      theUS vetoed the Sino-Russo resolution that banned ALL weapons (including WMDs) in space, and came up with the mealy mouthed one, because Ru has better nuke delivery vehicles like the SARMAT, and Hypersonic, they want to use other weapons against Ru but are only afraid of the nukes.

    • @RacingPoint-io8yk
      @RacingPoint-io8yk 9 днів тому +1

      @@MuantanamoMobile thats the point .

    • @NYSTilek
      @NYSTilek 7 днів тому +1

      ​@@MuantanamoMobile Indeed, why not ban something my competitor is good at.

  • @hindhtvaterrorism4559
    @hindhtvaterrorism4559 9 днів тому +53

    Russia should veto anything America wants , this is the right thing to do, don't give them anything without getting anything back in return.

    • @Soundsinthevoid
      @Soundsinthevoid 9 днів тому +3

      that would lead to no decision of anything anymore... Who would benefit from that?

    • @iMeanWell857
      @iMeanWell857 9 днів тому +4

      @@Soundsinthevoid that would make America humble… they will rarely veto anything again

    • @Soundsinthevoid
      @Soundsinthevoid 9 днів тому +4

      @@iMeanWell857 They could do the same and veto everything that russia wants, so how exactly?

    • @iMeanWell857
      @iMeanWell857 9 днів тому

      @@Soundsinthevoidwell, let’s see who wins then… we both know Russia doesn’t go about asking for things to be done in a certain way or propose resolutions as much as USA… everyone knows UN has been a tool for USA, let’s see how you use your tool when people veto resolution as a revenge!

    • @iMeanWell857
      @iMeanWell857 9 днів тому

      Nobody makes more resolutions than USA at the UN… let’s see how uncomfortable USA will be at the UN going forward

  • @aaronrule333
    @aaronrule333 9 днів тому +91

    If America is saying not to put nukes in space they most likely are when has America followed any international rules😂

    • @hurricanenigel5111
      @hurricanenigel5111 9 днів тому +3

      Same thing for russia

    • @shaneobrien148
      @shaneobrien148 9 днів тому +9

      @@hurricanenigel5111no

    • @constructiveeconomics6733
      @constructiveeconomics6733 9 днів тому +1

      Do not accept hypocrites who seemingly seek to have dominion over all realms of human spaces but will never accept that reality for themselves.

    • @lazyguy4825
      @lazyguy4825 9 днів тому +2

      @@constructiveeconomics6733 touch some grass dudes. even india has nuclear weapons there. india china russia america and maybe britiane they all do. space power is the new superpower. days of airforce are gone

    • @pisablavatsky-cb3dd
      @pisablavatsky-cb3dd 9 днів тому

      the fact is that if countries can place WMD in outer space, all will become equal coz today US is encircling Russia and china with placing nukes in its vassals states around both countries. If WMD is allowed in outer space, US advantage would become useless because distance of WMD from each countries will become equal which US wants to avoid. China and Russia should veto all kind of hidden agenda moves of nezi US

  • @minimovies7815
    @minimovies7815 9 днів тому +47

    5:21 don't pretend that you care about opinion of rest of the council. The same council voted for a UN seat for Palestine, US vetoed it remember.

  • @KenshinPhoenix
    @KenshinPhoenix 9 днів тому +75

    If you think the US doesn't have them in space already I have a bridge to sell you.

    • @NafoDato
      @NafoDato 9 днів тому

      If you honestly believe that, then I have some prime real estate on Mars to offer you at a bargain price!

  • @Ryan-ms3fk
    @Ryan-ms3fk 9 днів тому +24

    Why not just ban all weapons in space like russia and china wanted to

    • @NafoDato
      @NafoDato 9 днів тому

      That is possible, but vetoing this ban serves no purpose than to inflame tensions and make other resolutions for arms control less likely to pass.

    • @BrakeDenzo
      @BrakeDenzo 6 днів тому +1

      Because that's against USA NATO interest.

  • @huzib.8623
    @huzib.8623 9 днів тому +94

    America has gone crazy. Better you people just migrate to Mars

    • @awesomejob4209
      @awesomejob4209 9 днів тому +10

      Nowhere is suitable for Americans and Europeans.

    • @luclasnier7147
      @luclasnier7147 9 днів тому +1

      Et que dire des 13 autres pays qui ont voté pour la résolution.

    • @JackBackman-rd1uw
      @JackBackman-rd1uw 9 днів тому +1

      @@awesomejob4209 Alienating an entire continent and most of a second continent. Good plan🙄

    • @NafoDato
      @NafoDato 9 днів тому

      @@awesomejob4209 Well, nowhere may be suitable for close-minded individuals. But for those who embrace and appreciate diverse cultures and experiences, the entire world is a playground waiting to be explored.

    • @depressedgamer1017
      @depressedgamer1017 9 днів тому

      ​@NafoDato you mean destroyed by the evil white colonizers and imperialists usa 🇺🇸 and europe 🇪🇺, the evil white colonizers and imperialists usa created plastics that is choking the planet earth 🌏, and the fish have small particles of plastic as well they digest and the evil white colonizers and imperialists created the evil Dow chemicals and pesticides. The evil white colonizers and imperialists that slaughtereand over 100 million Native Americans and kick started in 1492 Climate Change with deforestation and brutally enslaved, killed and enslaved Black's now have Climate Change to look forward to, the ice glaciers melting and rising temperatures and wildfires and Floods and the earthquakes and water crisis, the dying ecosystems and marine life all this to rule and control Black's and Hispanics and Arabic's and Asians. We 👊🏿👊🏾👊🏽👊🏼 Are United against evil white supremacy and imperialism

  • @user-lf9mt3ry3b
    @user-lf9mt3ry3b 9 днів тому +72

    Russia has the right to defend itself

    • @wendelldig591
      @wendelldig591 9 днів тому +3

      Lol why defend with nuclear in space?

    • @PriSharma-ix3gd
      @PriSharma-ix3gd 9 днів тому

      America vetoed the state for Palestine resolution...let them taste their own medicine​@@wendelldig591

    • @RacingPoint-io8yk
      @RacingPoint-io8yk 9 днів тому +2

      @@wendelldig591 why not ?

    • @NafoDato
      @NafoDato 9 днів тому

      @@RacingPoint-io8yk Are you a misanthrope?

    • @MGB2408
      @MGB2408 9 днів тому

      @@wendelldig591 Because USA is the equivalent of cancer

  • @sashimongba9163
    @sashimongba9163 9 днів тому +66

    US is deploying nuclear weapons every where in the world, but how come it is against deploying the same in the space by others.If the US is serious then it must first recall all it's nuclear weapons deployed in other countries.

    • @Sebrof3
      @Sebrof3 9 днів тому

      Russia is the only one threatening everyone with them all the time!

    • @constructiveeconomics6733
      @constructiveeconomics6733 9 днів тому +4

      Do not accept hypocrites who seemingly seek to have dominion over all realms of human spaces but will never accept that reality for themselves.

    • @linkmeforfun
      @linkmeforfun 9 днів тому +5

      If the US thinks that it is okay to surround Russia's neighborhood with nuclear weapons, why would Russia think it is not hypocritical for the US to prevent nuclear weapons in space? In any case, the US has proven that Treaties and UN Resolutions are not worth the paper they are written on.

    • @pisablavatsky-cb3dd
      @pisablavatsky-cb3dd 9 днів тому

      the fact is that if countries can place WMD in outer space, all will become equal coz today US is encircling Russia and china with placing nukes in its vassals states around both countries. If WMD is allowed in outer space, US advantage would become useless because distance of WMD from each countries will become equal which US wants to avoid. China and Russia should veto all kind of hidden agenda moves of nezi US

    • @mazlanbashah85
      @mazlanbashah85 9 днів тому +3

      should US be attacked by having WMD? because US attacked Iraq for that..

  • @FlamespeedyAMV
    @FlamespeedyAMV 9 днів тому +47

    Its hilarious we are constantly told how war crazed Russia is, yet they are the first to veto this

    • @shamshershahi9880
      @shamshershahi9880 9 днів тому +3

      do you want anyone to put bomb in space?

    • @FlamespeedyAMV
      @FlamespeedyAMV 9 днів тому +5

      @@shamshershahi9880 Not really, especially America.

    • @al-adeelah2507
      @al-adeelah2507 9 днів тому

      I did not watch this in detail but I think the title is confusing with it double negatives.
      I think what it mean is ( US saying no weapons in space. and Russia saying. haha. no. )
      the country that sell the most weapons and start the most wars at the last years want others not to have weapons. ha ha ... no ...

    • @jimmyc974
      @jimmyc974 9 днів тому +4

      @@shamshershahi9880 There is already a treaty in place with 114 nations signed to it , perhaps some research or simple education would assist!

    • @shamshershahi9880
      @shamshershahi9880 9 днів тому

      @@jimmyc974 but why we need bomb in space? isn't it enough bombarding the earth? if they can have agreement putting bombs can't they agree on global peace?

  • @gentasman
    @gentasman 9 днів тому +49

    Why is the ceasefire in palastine is so difficult for US?

    • @NafoDato
      @NafoDato 9 днів тому

      Why is sticking to this specific topic so difficult for you?

    • @user-tl4qp9vm1x
      @user-tl4qp9vm1x 9 днів тому +1

      ​@@NafoDato brain rot

    • @apadia8447
      @apadia8447 8 днів тому

      because US are hypocrisy

  • @user-ho2vq5mc1k
    @user-ho2vq5mc1k 9 днів тому +28

    ❤❤Russia from South Africa

    • @NafoDato
      @NafoDato 9 днів тому

      I think you should be more concerned about SA keeping its lights on than mindlessly rooting for Russia.

  • @VoiceSriLanka
    @VoiceSriLanka 9 днів тому +10

    Russia 🇷🇺 is correct in saying *There shouldn’t be any weapons in the space*
    Why US is only talking about WMDs not any other weapons being stationed in the orbit ?

    • @NafoDato
      @NafoDato 9 днів тому

      It's funny how some people try to create this image of Russia being a victim of NATO and Western aggression only looking for peace while Russia tries their hardest to act like a generic supervillain--threatening to nuke other countries, threatening to march their troops across Europe, threatens an arms race in space.

  • @ITZMELIFE.
    @ITZMELIFE. 9 днів тому +57

    GLORY TO RUSSIA!🇷🇺💪🤝👊🇵🇭

    • @NafoDato
      @NafoDato 9 днів тому

      Ah yes, because nothing says glory like government corruption and human rights violations. Enjoy your vodka-soaked nationalism, comrade. 🥂🇷🇺

  • @businessmogul4026
    @businessmogul4026 9 днів тому +54

    How can they Even be Debating this, How foolish can Humans be to even bring this Up as a Topic

    • @marcusdosh408
      @marcusdosh408 9 днів тому +3

      EGOTISTICAL People....

    • @nirajshrestha5621
      @nirajshrestha5621 9 днів тому +1

      Russia and China proposed an amendment to the resolution that sought to prevent the placement of weapons of any kind in space. The two countries have for years promoted a treaty that would ban placing weapons of any kind in space.

    • @businessmogul4026
      @businessmogul4026 9 днів тому

      @@nirajshrestha5621 Russia and China have assassination intents towards oppositions for making that proposal. Being able to Kill people from out of space will poss a huge Nightmare to humanity

    • @nirajshrestha5621
      @nirajshrestha5621 9 днів тому +1

      Russia has valid point you cannot make such biased video, cherry pick what Russia did.
      Russia already mentioned it is banned on Outer Space Treaty. These agreements include the Partial Test Ban Treaty (1963), the Outer Space Treaty (1967), and the Moon Agreement (1979). Notably, the Outer Space Treaty prohibits states parties from placing nuclear weapons or any other WMD in orbit, on celestial bodies, or stationing them in outer space in any other manner.
      On top of that, Russia proposed even better amendments.Russia and China proposed an amendment to the resolution that sought to prevent the placement of weapons of any kind in space. The two countries have for years promoted a treaty that would ban placing weapons of any kind in space, an approach the United States and many other Western nations have opposed

    • @NafoDato
      @NafoDato 9 днів тому

      @@nirajshrestha5621 There is already a treaty in place with 114 nations signed to it , perhaps some research or simple education would assist!

  • @Tubytuty
    @Tubytuty 9 днів тому +61

    Victory to Russia from phil

    • @NafoDato
      @NafoDato 9 днів тому

      I honestly doubt you're from Philly.

  • @Equal2u
    @Equal2u 9 днів тому +33

    Seems like the US and UK probably already have WMD in space! Given this suprisingly random UN Resolution attempt!

    • @pisablavatsky-cb3dd
      @pisablavatsky-cb3dd 9 днів тому

      the fact is that if countries can place WMD in outer space, all will become equal coz today US is encircling Russia and china with placing nukes in its vassals states around both countries. If WMD is allowed in outer space, US advantage would become useless because distance of WMD from each countries will become equal which US wants to avoid. China and Russia should veto all kind of hidden agenda moves of nezi US

    • @NafoDato
      @NafoDato 9 днів тому

      Oh please, if the US and UK had WMD in space, do you really think they would need a "surprisingly random UN Resolution attempt" to reveal it? Let's try to keep our conspiracy theories at least somewhat grounded in reality, shall we?

    • @Equal2u
      @Equal2u 8 днів тому

      @@NafoDato Says the nafo Fifth Column Collaborator!

    • @pisablavatsky-cb3dd
      @pisablavatsky-cb3dd 8 днів тому

      @@NafoDato nezi west parrot?

  • @Equal2u
    @Equal2u 9 днів тому +63

    Seems likely that the US already has Nukes in Space!

    • @Sebrof3
      @Sebrof3 9 днів тому +1

      FAFO! We definitely have a little something something waiting for whoever wants to make a major mistake…they’re about as long as a telephone pole and no explosives involved, just good old kinetic energy.

    • @constructiveeconomics6733
      @constructiveeconomics6733 9 днів тому

      Do not accept hypocrites who seemingly seek to have dominion over all realms of human spaces but will never accept that reality for themselves.

    • @marcusdosh408
      @marcusdosh408 9 днів тому

      The US will like Israel will take zero notice of the UN... EGO has totally taken over the minds of the US

    • @niburu1508
      @niburu1508 9 днів тому +1

      @@Sebrof3 is that the Dream.?

    • @pisablavatsky-cb3dd
      @pisablavatsky-cb3dd 9 днів тому

      the fact is that if countries can place WMD in outer space, all will become equal coz today US is encircling Russia and china with placing nukes in its vassals states around both countries. If WMD is allowed in outer space, US advantage would become useless because distance of WMD from each countries will become equal which US wants to avoid. China and Russia should veto all kind of hidden agenda moves of nezi US

  • @danielsergeshokano8007
    @danielsergeshokano8007 9 днів тому +19

    It's seem like the world is fed up with the WEST double game I'm in the side of RUSSIA on this matter the deployment of any type of weapons in space should be banned that will close the door for this kind of subject for a more reasonable period of time

    • @NafoDato
      @NafoDato 9 днів тому +1

      Because we all know that Russia is the pinnacle of honesty and transparency when it comes to their military actions. Let's ignore the decades of espionage, cyber warfare, and aggression they've engaged in and just blindly trust them to play fair in space. Brilliant strategy, truly brilliant.

    • @kgosisimanyana
      @kgosisimanyana 2 дні тому

      America is the king of lying 😂😂​@@NafoDato

  • @mdmehemoodalam
    @mdmehemoodalam 9 днів тому +37

    Support to Russia 🇮🇳🇮🇳🇷🇺🇷🇺

  • @shahaaqib7935
    @shahaaqib7935 9 днів тому +9

    Russia have a point
    There should be ban on all kinds of weapons proliferation in outer space not just WMD

    • @NafoDato
      @NafoDato 9 днів тому

      OK, so let's ban nuclear weapons first and then others later.

  • @PicassoView
    @PicassoView 9 днів тому +10

    The only nation capable of doing that is Russia. That's why they proposed the resolution.

  • @desinetizen
    @desinetizen 9 днів тому +11

    Keep veto any resolution brought by this hypocrite..

    • @NafoDato
      @NafoDato 9 днів тому

      Then America should veto any resolution brought by this warmongering nation.

  • @rizanawaz2723
    @rizanawaz2723 9 днів тому +22

    Dont ask anything from USA

    • @niburu1508
      @niburu1508 9 днів тому +2

      What cult are the beggars from%.?

    • @Aurxa09
      @Aurxa09 9 днів тому

      Ok Indian then why American tourists visit India

  • @monimojumdar6228
    @monimojumdar6228 9 днів тому +9

    Shame on USA,Respect Russia.

    • @NafoDato
      @NafoDato 9 днів тому

      Shame on Russia.

  • @andrewwale7002
    @andrewwale7002 9 днів тому +8

    The American and Japanese delegations behaves like school childrens🤣😂🤣

    • @NafoDato
      @NafoDato 9 днів тому

      Are you sure you aren't talking about the Russian or Chinese delegations?

    • @yummytummy88
      @yummytummy88 4 дні тому

      It is clear that the master and sub servant has fear of equal mutual destruction option should US has ANY funny business of attacking Russia or China if they don't bow down to the empire.

  • @sunnychew905
    @sunnychew905 9 днів тому +7

    Russia learning from the us-cuba nuclear crisis well 😂😂

  • @mvpstarchannelff3095
    @mvpstarchannelff3095 9 днів тому +59

    🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺

  • @MGB2408
    @MGB2408 9 днів тому +5

    Coming from the states is laughable 😂😂😂😂😂 Who really trust them now?

    • @NafoDato
      @NafoDato 9 днів тому

      Oh please, coming from a country with such a rich history of political scandals and corruption, I think we can take criticism from Russia with a grain of salt. Trusting anyone in politics these days is a risky game regardless of nationality. Let's focus on the issues at hand rather than pointing fingers based on geography.

  • @kuidezso8465
    @kuidezso8465 9 днів тому +4

    Super Congratulation RUSSSIA ❤🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉❤

    • @NafoDato
      @NafoDato 9 днів тому

      Russia vetoes UN vote on stopping arms race in outer space admits it's a terrorist state.

  • @user-gc4om5vf3f
    @user-gc4om5vf3f 9 днів тому +34

    Looks like Japan didn't learn from it's past

    • @user-ux9br2sg5b
      @user-ux9br2sg5b 9 днів тому

      Sushi nation still hoping for a revival of its dream of a Nippon Empire in the East while Emperor Biden controls the West

    • @pisablavatsky-cb3dd
      @pisablavatsky-cb3dd 9 днів тому +2

      Nuked and humiliated samurais are now slaves of its nuke master😂😂

    • @zehrag3781
      @zehrag3781 9 днів тому

      They've become a colonial outpost of US...thst was the deal.made.

    • @luclasnier7147
      @luclasnier7147 9 днів тому

      Laissez ce pays dans sa merde. Le pays le plus honteux de la planète. Pas de fierté, pas d'honneur, des lâches au pouvoir depuis la fin de la 2e guerre mondiale. Vassal parmi les vassaux des USA.

    • @NafoDato
      @NafoDato 9 днів тому

      @@pisablavatsky-cb3dd Japan the 4th largest economy in the entire world and a leader in technological advancements because of its so-called "nuke master".

  • @sorayaessakjee1397
    @sorayaessakjee1397 9 днів тому +4

    She looks shocked, that someone else does not agree with her

  • @unreal4good367
    @unreal4good367 9 днів тому +5

    The us got the taste of their own medicine after vetoing the Palestinian statehood resolution a few days ago.

    • @NafoDato
      @NafoDato 9 днів тому

      Russia vetoing this resolution is a disservice to humanity. Vetoing statehood for Palestine is nowhere similar to vetoing ban nuclear weapons in space.

  • @Babuka54
    @Babuka54 9 днів тому +3

    Как сказал знаменитый Отто фон Бисмарк - "Не надейтесь, что единожды воспользовавшись слабостью России, вы будете получать дивиденды вечно. Русские всегда приходят за своими деньгами. И когда они придут - не надейтесь на подписанные вами иезуитские соглашения, якобы вас оправдывающие. Они не стоят той бумаги, на которой написаны. Поэтому с русскими стоит или играть честно, или вообще не играть."

  • @aymanghaibeh8589
    @aymanghaibeh8589 9 днів тому +3

    The Russian Ambassador needled the American ambassador to get her to admit the US already weaponized space. She tried to change the topic to no nukes in space. But what about all the other weapons?

  • @tausifkhan6928
    @tausifkhan6928 9 днів тому +3

    When US unable do it, they ban others of doing same.

    • @yummytummy88
      @yummytummy88 4 дні тому

      You mean like the current new term "over capacity" for affordable good make in China that US hate. As a consumer in the US, why wouldn't anyone want good that NOT too expensive, especially these days with the inflation. The elected politicians is actually working against its citizen, by making things so expensive at home with inflation, self inflicted by the means of Ukraine special operation and heavy tariffs against Chinese goods.

  • @thuweinmassoud9062
    @thuweinmassoud9062 9 днів тому +24

    long life russia

    • @NafoDato
      @NafoDato 9 днів тому

      "Live" not life.

  • @truthisthevictory9278
    @truthisthevictory9278 9 днів тому +4

    We've had nukes in space since Regan era star wars program.

    • @NafoDato
      @NafoDato 9 днів тому

      That's a lie. President Ronald Reagan's "Star Wars" program was not aimed at placing nuclear weapons in space. It was a proposed missile defense system meant to protect the United States from nuclear attacks by intercepting and destroying incoming missiles.

  • @user-hs8wt5ou4d
    @user-hs8wt5ou4d 9 днів тому +3

    This women has played so many games. She should not be allowed through the UN doors. She should be vetoed out of the UN.

    • @tashalorm4313
      @tashalorm4313 9 днів тому

      It isn't about the woman, it is about US policy. The whole US State Department is deceptive.

  • @thorpedersen8868
    @thorpedersen8868 9 днів тому +2

    Normally when the US asks for permission to do something its because they have already done it.

  • @redted366
    @redted366 9 днів тому +5

    DID YANKEE LAND FORGET HIROSHIMA NAGASAKI

    • @NafoDato
      @NafoDato 9 днів тому

      So? Should we all not come together to ban nuclear weapons in space? Why is Russia refusing peace? Are more Russians about to suffer because of their government? Sad.

  • @andrejpetrovic8240
    @andrejpetrovic8240 9 днів тому +2

    The atmosphere is boiling in that room!

  • @gentasman
    @gentasman 9 днів тому +4

    U S should allow Russian inspectors to inspect their facilities first to be sure what they are really doing. While they don't stop ask others to comply

    • @NafoDato
      @NafoDato 9 днів тому

      Russia should allow American inspectors to inspect their facilities first to be sure what they are really doing.

  • @singularity-6339
    @singularity-6339 9 днів тому +4

    Well if US would be in a position to deploy nukes in space, it would be no problem at all.

  • @mytorment
    @mytorment 9 днів тому +4

    If you don't think every nuclear power already has nukes floating in orbit then youre insane

  • @aliciakennedy8138
    @aliciakennedy8138 9 днів тому +2

    It is too late Usa for any cooperation

  • @user-ti3qs1oo6x
    @user-ti3qs1oo6x 9 днів тому +4

    Russia is going to do it no matter what the un vote is

  • @kenprice2877
    @kenprice2877 9 днів тому +3

    It’s only because America is so far behind Russia in space 😂

    • @NafoDato
      @NafoDato 9 днів тому

      Well, I guess it's a good thing we don't measure our greatness by how quickly we can launch things into outer space. Last time I checked, America is leading the world in plenty of other areas that actually matter.

  • @user-or3gb7fh9f
    @user-or3gb7fh9f 9 днів тому +3

    Stupid council will soon fall

  • @evanbuarao1982
    @evanbuarao1982 9 днів тому +2

    With one cruel dictator

  • @BATTLECATT00
    @BATTLECATT00 9 днів тому +2

    I agree with the Ru, If such a active treaty restriction already exist, makes no sense to create another. There must be alternative motive to this.

    • @pisablavatsky-cb3dd
      @pisablavatsky-cb3dd 9 днів тому

      the fact is that if countries can place WMD in outer space, all will become equal coz today US is encircling Russia and china with placing nukes in its vassals states around both countries. If WMD is allowed in outer space, US advantage would become useless because distance of WMD from each countries will become equal which US wants to avoid. China and Russia should veto all kind of hidden agenda moves of nezi US

    • @NafoDato
      @NafoDato 9 днів тому

      This ban is to reaffirm the current, active restrictions treaty. There have been plenty of resolutions like this before. So there must be an ulterior motive for Russia to veto this.

    • @BATTLECATT00
      @BATTLECATT00 9 днів тому +1

      @@NafoDato , Nah, there is no such thing as reaffirm anything. That is like saying, "We have this law for speeding, so we want to make another law for speeding, even tho we have one already, and it is very odd you don't agree with us doing another law on speeding even tho the same law is already active and exist". And this makes sense to you? U.S. already jumped out of every agreement with the Ru except for the last one for Nuke inspection, and Ru ended that. U.S. doesn't keep their word anyway, it's all about what they can make work for themselves. Agreements only work with both sides work together. There for, to come up with some none sense restriction for a existing restriction already enforced, is VERY, very suspicious.

    • @pisablavatsky-cb3dd
      @pisablavatsky-cb3dd 8 днів тому

      Why is nezi west run yt deleting my comments? This is nezi west free speech

  • @sunnykhanx8730
    @sunnykhanx8730 9 днів тому +2

    Irony is only US have ever conducted nuclear test in space 😂

    • @NafoDato
      @NafoDato 9 днів тому

      That was 1962 and before Outer Space Treaty (1967). Let's stick to today.

    • @sunnykhanx8730
      @sunnykhanx8730 8 днів тому

      @@NafoDato
      You cannot dictate others about something you did once anyway you cannot talk peace and US in same sentence.

  • @heavyraintumbagaodin7402
    @heavyraintumbagaodin7402 9 днів тому +2

    only US allowed to orbit nuclear weapons in outer space😅

    • @NafoDato
      @NafoDato 9 днів тому

      Not true. Don't spread misinformation.

  • @andreweadon-dale6613
    @andreweadon-dale6613 9 днів тому +5

    Who can you believe!!!

    • @Equal2u
      @Equal2u 9 днів тому +3

      Not the US

    • @pisablavatsky-cb3dd
      @pisablavatsky-cb3dd 9 днів тому

      the fact is that if countries can place WMD in outer space, all will become equal coz today US is encircling Russia and china with placing nukes in its vassals states around both countries. If WMD is allowed in outer space, US advantage would become useless because distance of WMD from each countries will become equal which US wants to avoid. China and Russia should veto all kind of hidden agenda moves of nezi US

  • @theautoman22
    @theautoman22 9 днів тому +1

    When has the US ever went along with a treaty like this with Russia? I think never, they always break the treaty!!

    • @NafoDato
      @NafoDato 9 днів тому

      I hate to break it to you, but the US has actually followed through on numerous treaties with Russia in the past. It's not exactly fair to lump all agreements together and paint the US as a habitual treaty-breaker. Maybe it's time to brush up on your history before making such bold claims.

  • @user-ys9dj1xq4b
    @user-ys9dj1xq4b 9 днів тому +4

    Russia will build this kind of weapons

    • @NafoDato
      @NafoDato 9 днів тому

      The USA will follow suit.

  • @ahmedadan5393
    @ahmedadan5393 9 днів тому +2

    Rassia learnt from US. No difference from vetoing palastinian state.

    • @NafoDato
      @NafoDato 9 днів тому

      Yes, there is a huge difference vetoing Palestinian statehood and banning nukes in space.

    • @DeBattousai
      @DeBattousai 8 днів тому

      ​​@@NafoDatoyou just a retard who support the west

  • @mhartzbagundang4429
    @mhartzbagundang4429 9 днів тому

    "Ensuring that states do not go to dark path"
    A word from someone with no moral grounds

  • @TokitoRen5633
    @TokitoRen5633 9 днів тому +6

    theres a reason why russia is so good in making nukes and other wmds the only reason why there oil is still safe i guess

    • @luclasnier7147
      @luclasnier7147 9 днів тому

      ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ

  • @user-tt5tq9jx6c
    @user-tt5tq9jx6c 9 днів тому +1

    Russia has been asking for space not to be militarised for decates . Now the US remembered it all of a sudden ?? Whats wrong ?? they are not capable to sent wapons up there so if they cannot do it nobody else should ??

    • @pisablavatsky-cb3dd
      @pisablavatsky-cb3dd 9 днів тому

      the fact is that if countries can place WMD in outer space, all will become equal coz today US is encircling Russia and china with placing nukes in its vassals states around both countries. If WMD is allowed in outer space, US advantage would become useless because distance of WMD from each countries will become equal which US wants to avoid. China and Russia should veto all kind of hidden agenda moves of nezi US

  • @user-xz6ot7wf4j
    @user-xz6ot7wf4j 8 днів тому

    What happened with the Minsk agreements showed how much the US values its agreements.

  • @rossiammery6815
    @rossiammery6815 9 днів тому +1

    I mean, if us can, why other cannot

  • @cristinaj9882
    @cristinaj9882 7 днів тому

    It's a plea: Please, do not place nuclear weapons in the space, too. We not allow any competition, live us alone.
    And now, because of the Russian veto, they will admit that they simply had to do it, because of the threat...because preemptive... because.

  • @livondiramerian6999
    @livondiramerian6999 9 днів тому +1

    All nuclear weapons should be banned.

  • @As-cc2xz
    @As-cc2xz 9 днів тому +4

    I can't believe they want to wipe space too😅😅

  • @shahadathkadir
    @shahadathkadir 9 днів тому +2

    Vetoing the vetoer makes me laugh !

    • @NafoDato
      @NafoDato 9 днів тому

      The same can be said when the U.S. vetos Russian resolutions.

  • @eclanzeus2404
    @eclanzeus2404 9 днів тому +1

    Focus first on earth and water

  • @nicholasanthonyothienoabin8994
    @nicholasanthonyothienoabin8994 9 днів тому +1

    If America had the ability to hide nuclear weapons even in mars they would have done it.

  • @veranjankurululasuriya7843
    @veranjankurululasuriya7843 9 днів тому

    Not even if all those who are alive on this earth today agree, should anyone be allowed to put any kind of weapons in outer space; that space is for all humanity including those who are not yet born.

  • @naymatunc-rc6vs
    @naymatunc-rc6vs 7 днів тому +1

    What goes around comes around

  • @user-ks4yn4qq7m
    @user-ks4yn4qq7m 9 днів тому +2

    The Enemies of my Enemies are my Friends

  • @rgb8013
    @rgb8013 8 днів тому

    US just realized that veto is double edge sword.

  • @sentinelOO7
    @sentinelOO7 9 днів тому +2

    Let me translate, Russia says, US of Israel can get to F***.

    • @NafoDato
      @NafoDato 9 днів тому

      That makes no sense at all.

  • @aliezhasa9490
    @aliezhasa9490 8 днів тому

    When the us envoy mentioned that "with the vote count, this is not what the council wanted", i was just thinking of all the US vetos on Palestinian state and the ceasefire which every other member voted for

  • @udayasampath3530
    @udayasampath3530 9 днів тому

    Russia❤❤❤from SriLanka

  • @braystuskibassa3842
    @braystuskibassa3842 9 днів тому +8

    U.S again what do you want to this world?

  • @legionsofheaven7853
    @legionsofheaven7853 9 днів тому +2

    Welp i guess the arms race is on now to see who can have the most wmd in space nice

  • @user-yw9kw3qv6x
    @user-yw9kw3qv6x 9 днів тому +1

    The only meaning of placing nuclear weapons in space is to deliver a nuclear strike that cannot be reflected and makes sense only in the case of the “first disarming strike” doctrine. Of the three countries dominant in nuclear weapons (Russia, China and the United States), only the United States professes this doctrine. The doctrine of the use of nuclear weapons is not something that can be changed with the stroke of a pen in a couple of minutes; it takes decades to change the doctrine. Ballistic missiles of the United States and Russia are fundamentally different from each other precisely because they profess different doctrines of use and changes in the doctrine will require changes in the missiles themselves. All Russian nuclear weapons were created with the condition that they would be used either as a retaliatory strike or as a counter strike. Russian missiles do not have sufficient accuracy to destroy enemy launch silos with missiles inside; they are initially designed to retaliate against enemy military bases and cities. At the time of their launch, the enemy’s launch silos will already be empty. Their low accuracy is not due to a technology defect, but to the earliest possible divergence of warheads from the launch vehicle after entering impact orbit. This is necessary to overcome the enemy’s layered missile defense in conditions when a significant part of your nuclear arsenal was destroyed on the ground by the enemy’s first strike. Warheads on US missiles are separated as late as possible, which ensures, on the one hand, maximum accuracy, and on the other hand, makes them maximally vulnerable to anti-missile defenses.
    By the way, theoretically, nuclear weapons located in space can be very effective for launching a “primary disarming strike” against an enemy who is unaware of the attack, leaving him with a few seconds to use missile defense systems and a few minutes to make a decision in a retaliatory strike. When attempting to use orbital nuclear weapons in a retaliatory strike, a country starting a global nuclear conflict can relatively easily destroy satellites with nuclear weapons in the first minutes of the conflict because they cannot be hidden (unlike submarines in the depths of the ocean). All orbital objects are cataloged and tracked, and it is not difficult for specialists to identify which satellite is carrying nuclear weapons.

  • @johngamerschlag7001
    @johngamerschlag7001 6 днів тому

    The USA started the military involved in space with the Space Force. Did they think China and Russia won’t be obliged to respond with their weapons in space as well.

  • @maikelele6513
    @maikelele6513 8 днів тому

    US thinks it has the exclusive right to veto

  • @allansmith3837
    @allansmith3837 9 днів тому +1

    Well done Russia 🇷🇺 good enough for America good enough for everyone else.

  • @ruzzputin
    @ruzzputin 6 днів тому

    The issue here is not nuclear weapons in space but what USA defines as a nuclear weapon in space. US view - "Anything nuclear belonging to NATO is not nuclear. Anything even non-nuclear by Russia is nuclear." This is what Russia vetoed. Well done. Now there is a level playing field.

  • @villavan
    @villavan 9 днів тому

    Imagine dropping a modern day version of tsar bomba from space 😂

  • @sheikhsirajulhaq9897
    @sheikhsirajulhaq9897 9 днів тому +2

    BLINDS WANTS TO GO SPACE

  • @220volt-u7
    @220volt-u7 9 днів тому +2

    what is the USa hiding in arena51? nuclear production?

    • @NafoDato
      @NafoDato 9 днів тому

      Experimental aircraft. Anything else?

  • @Nobleman707
    @Nobleman707 9 днів тому +2

    Which country was the first ever to use nuclear weapon?

    • @NafoDato
      @NafoDato 9 днів тому

      Why is that relevant in this discussion?

  • @cheefkeef8749
    @cheefkeef8749 5 днів тому

    Does the US not have anyone that can think for themselves to speak on these things. They even have DEI hires for the UN

  • @riazali3000
    @riazali3000 9 днів тому

    Atleast Russia is taking stand for what is right

  • @ragibsen3211
    @ragibsen3211 9 днів тому

    US way of saying : we have it but check it if someone has it. Russian way of saying : we don't want to cancel the proposition or prospects.

  • @seankano
    @seankano 9 днів тому +1

    Why are they scared,It is a deterrent

    • @NafoDato
      @NafoDato 9 днів тому

      Having nukes in space, nukes designed to terminate all satellites that supports our infrastructure. It's crazy how childish and stupid Russia is. Everyone knows it's backwards, it's a BAD IDEA. But yet here we are.

  • @presekkk
    @presekkk 9 днів тому +1

    Putin won't place WMD's rather MADW's(mutually assured destructive weapons)😂😂😂😂

  • @arashidosmannoorteeri8930
    @arashidosmannoorteeri8930 9 днів тому +1

    What Jabanese can do because they are still colonies by USA

  • @titusplank5628
    @titusplank5628 9 днів тому +1

    Queen Kong goes bananas at Russia and China.

    • @NafoDato
      @NafoDato 9 днів тому

      Reported for borderline racism.

  • @aimanfaysal1035
    @aimanfaysal1035 9 днів тому +1

    The UNSC has Fell apart.
    I'd accused only one Actor that is US