Prase Jesus Christ for your work and keep telling people how to get saved also hope you get to meet Dr Stephen Meyer have enjoyed both of your videos prase Jesus
I graduated from Whitworth College in Physics a year after Dr. Meyer and we both graduated from Whitworth with dual Science degrees. This speaker, Dr. Lisle means well and I'm glad he is a Christian, but telling people the Earth is 6000 years old and we lived with Dinosaurs is just rediculous!! Dr. Stephen Meyer and I are both OLD EARTH CREATIONIST CHRISTIANS!! Both of us understand the Earth is 4.5 Billion years old! Please keep in mind EVOLUTION doesn't follow from an OLD EARTH. I graduated with a dual BS in PHYSICS and CHEMISTRY and I understand just how impossible ABIOGENENESIS really is. God created LIFE on Earth and life is INCREDIBLY COMPLICATED from a biochemical basis and in our GENETICS. God created life, and God created life to evolve. Evolution doesn't mean LIFE started randomly because the Biochemistry doesn't support this Worldview. The BIOLOGICAL IMAGING is showing over and over that GOD Created life and life is incredibly COMPLEX!! I don't have all the answers, but then again neither does Dr. Lisle. I suggest all my Christian students to focus on Jesus Christ and his Life, Death, and RESSURECTION!! His RESSURECTION was recorded on the first XRAY that recorded the SHROUD of TURIN and this PROVES JESUS and GOD was real and only GOD can raise us from the Dead!! I don't have anything to sell you, I just want people to know the TRUTH!! GOD Bless
@philipbuckley759 I don't believe in or push "thiestic" evolution. That said, the ONLY theistic understanding we MUST grasp is the fact GOD created everything seen and unseen. This is our only bedrock of Faith, and the fact JESUS is the Messiah promised in the old testament and he fulfilled Scripture and was RESSURECTED. I love the fact that if Athiests desire "material" proof we do have the SHROUD of TURIN to point them to. As a PhD level Physicist I measuring particle accelerator radiations and nuclear weapons radiations for a living for 34 years and contributed to the medical field in terms of radiation detectors used all over the developed World. The SHROUD image is only 1 part in a thousand of the diameter of a human hair deep on the topmost microfibers of the burial linen. It's AD superficial as it gets and no technique in Science, Photography, or Art can duplicate that superficial of darkening EXCEPT ELECTRON BEAM and PARTICLE ACCELERATORS used in the Hugh technology industry since the 1980s. We can duplicate the SHROUD even with millions of dollars and modern technology. The SHROUD matches the PASSION STORY in the GOSPELS and that's wonderful!! All this said I understand how dating works in terms of the Earth and Universe and besides all those dating techniques agreeing the Earth is EXTREMELY OLD 4.5 billion years old there are multitudes of age indicators all over the World and ALL of these are in agreement with what I just said. Next we have the issue of WHY WOULD OUR GOD that we love and is TRUTH, make an Earth and Universe that just APPEARS OLD just to LIE TO US and FOOL US. There simply isn't any reliable data or theory that supports a young Earth and anyone that buys into the YOUNG EARTH hasn't followed the multitudes of evidence that reaches that Conclusion. Secondly, there are massive numbers of skeletons of ancient man that show a progression towards modern man. At a minimum you have to address the fossil records and all the bones that aptly demonstrate this progression. Thirdly, there are HALITE mineral deposits all over the CRUST and upper MANTLE of the Earth that are formed by seas and Oceans that dry up and leave these salt deposits. You also have all the different types of rocks all over the place that tell the Story of the ROCK CYCLE. Teach Earth Science like I do and immerse yourself into the subject and you will realize quickly we are on an ancient planet. Finally look at all the dang GALAXIES all over!! The UNIVERSE is super massive and it just HAILS TO OUR POWERFUL GOD and his Son JESUS CHRIST!! I don't have many answers but I praise God and marvel at all his handiwork. Evolution or not GOD is an amazing CREATOR and his SON JESUS is my Savior!!
Poland has a legend of a fire throwing dragon living in a cave under a castle Wawel in Cracow.. that dragon was given young maidens as offerings. Was also killed by a brave young man , who married the king’s daughter as a reward.
Legends had yo come from somewhere. People nowadays assume incorrectly, that people just made up legends out if their imaginations, but we see more, and more, that there's truth behind these legends.
The fall of humanity was catastrophic. Flies in the ointment that contaminated God's creation led to death. "The heaven, even the heavens, are the Lord's, but the earth He has given to the children of men." God gave us the title deed to this planet, and we gave it away and allowed evil into the world. "Whence then is evil?"
We are always told Noah only brought two of each type of animal onto the Ark, but he was told to bring 9 of each. Gen 7:2-3 tells us God told Noah to collect 7 clean animals of each kind and two unclean animals of each kind. "Take with you seven pairs of all clean animals, the male and his mate; and a pair of the animals that are not clean, the male and his mate; and seven pairs of the birds of the air also, male and female, to keep their kind alive upon the face of all the earth."
The geology does suggest that the earth was divided in the days of Peleg (divided) which came to mean "as the waters flow" in the later Aramaic. There are glacial striations going from south to north in all of the continents that were connected at the South Pole including South America, Africa, India, Australia. The flood sediments and fossils line up between the continents suggesting that the deposition occurred first and then broke apart. It also explains how all of the mammoths, lions, bears wolves and other animals were frozen and buried enmass from the continents that moved north and got shoved into the Arctic causing tsunamis and instant climate change. It's the only possible explanation. Jaguars were separated from leopards, honey badgers were separated from the South American greater grison, camels were separated, crocodiles were separated, tapirs were separated, possums and opossums were separated and many other animals. The people never crossed from Africa to South America because they were busy building the Tower of Babel when the earth was divided. The lifespan of humans was cut in half a second time as a result. There was magnetic pole reversals recorded on the ocean floor as the continents spread apart. The mechanism was basic centrifugal force once the out of balance continents broke apart possibly from another asteroid or something. It was a second catastrophic event which caused people to isolate into family groups so that they began speaking their own languages. ...and now you know the rest of the story.
Aztecshad dinosaur sculptures,so did egiptians and more recent the gobekli tepe (unknown creators) "temples"have stone carvings depicting dinosaurs,so TRUE
I was a Christian for the first 45 years of my life and fell away. I wanted desperately to get back to God so I prayed and I read and studied the Bible and how it was written and wanted to believe so incredibly bad but I just can’t get past the facts that I’ve learned such as the fundamental stories are based on older ancient writings and it therefore cannot be solely “God’s Word”. There’s a much earlier creation account in the Enuma Elish, the flood story, there’s a much earlier version in the Epic of Gilgamesh. There are even other people who were said to have done the same things as Jesus, both doing miracles and dying and living again. I promise I’m not trying to be argumentative, I’m just simply trying to find someone who can help me comprehend how it’s possible to believe what seems so obviously just another take on the earlier myths.
If you are truly interested in finding the truth can I suggest you look up the cosmic codes videos on youtube by Chuck Missler. There are 9 of them. The first one to watch would be Cosmic Codes Sampler: Various Bible Codes followed by Cosmic Codes #1 and so on to Cosmic Codes #8 If you don't want to or are not interested then I don't believe you are interested in even looking into any other evidence and are being willingly ignorant of the truth of the Creator and author of the Bible.
I see no way there can be redemption from the effects of the fall without a historic Adam. The Patriarchs, Prophets, Apostles and Christ taught the Old Testament as history. There can be no second Adam without the first.
The oil industry uses secular knowledge based on old earth geology and evolution and it works wonderfully well to find and extract oil… wonder why young earthers don’t have the same success…
The leviathan would more likely be a deinosuchus. Especially when describing the double coat of armor, and the back row of shields tightly sealed together.
@@sinjinbritt3371 I think that’s more complicated that an actual creature that can just be described by the writer rather than invented and described by the writer
@truthovertea then you're saying you worship the Babylonian gods, since they described it first? Interesting. Or can you just admit that making it up, or even plagiarizing, is nothing more, nothing less than writing a description of a fictional fire-breathing water dragon.... that we both know isn't real.
I think one of the main reasons evolutionists fight so hard against the creationists is because their authority and their training is on the line, if they are proven wrong by creationists then their authority is undermined, not to mention all of the training and degrees in the scientific fields they are in. they have a lot riding on this issue, because we are essentially challenging what they have gotten their various degrees in. there is pride involved, they paid a big chunk of change and a good bit of time to get their degrees, if proven wrong then everything they worked for is undone, so they have a lot riding on this issue.
No, it is because as scientists we value truth and scientific reasoning above nearly all else. The promotion of creationism in the face of vast and extensive contrary evidence directly violates some of our dearest virtues.
@@SchnTgaiSpock what virtues? If we are nothing but evolved pond scum you have no reason for virtue, law, or order, but rather the law of the jungle, survival of the fittest, you have no reason for virtue law and order. Oh wait, we do not even exist anyway, we are boltzmann brains, its either that or we are part of a multilevel simulation on some alien computer. Its hard for nature to make whole universes but much easier to make a naked brain, oh and those memories you have, well the matter in the brain had to be arranged someway and what you think you remember or perceive even now are false. That is where the math of the big bang ultimately leads to as a super star cosmologist has said, that it is infinitely unlikely that we are normal brains. A.G.
No, it's simply the fact that society runs on good science. Your car, your phone, nuclear power, all require the methodologies in the sciences to work and be effective. In the end everything is just simple statistical analysis and data crunching, and creationists mainly reject modern technology, even if they do 'use' it'.
@@davidbutler1857 Basically, there are two evolutionary paradigms one is the Big Bang theory and the other is molecules to man evolution, the big bang is so full of problems and band-aids that it is not funny, Carl Sagan famously said we are star stuff, Niel Tyson has said almost the same exact thing, before you can get to molecules to man, you need stars and habitable planets for molecules to man evolution to work, stars are where they elements are made, up to Iron, for all the rest those are made in supernova explosions. the elements of life, so you would think explaining stars is high on their list, they claim today that stars form by supernova explosions close to a gas cloud compressing the cloud until gravity takes over, and at some point fusion starts, or grains of dust enter the cloud cooling it until it compresses and fusion starts, and last collisions, such as two galaxies merging and new stars being born along the collision front, just one major hiccup, in all three you need stars to exist to make the next generation, a supernova is a star exploding, grains of dust, the big bang did not make any, the elements for those are made in stars and galaxy collisions are just huge collections of stars. Run this thing back to the beginning and you had no first generation to make the second, and I have a bunch of quotes from secular authors detailing that very problem, No Stars, No US. but it gets worse, they have no building blocks for the planets, as when the little rocks merge to become bigger rocks, at about a meter in size they have enough mass to smash each other into rubble, and cannot overcome this until they get to the size of an asteroid. some have claimed that planetesimals formed in a single leap without any intermediate stages, is that science? or just a bunch of hand waving to come up with any old story that will do. But it gets worse as there is the migration problem, even if the small rocks could get to planetesimal size, as they orbit the protostar i.e. our sun, they are plowing through the gas cloud a headwind, which slows them down, and in about 200 orbits will merge with the protostar, as when an object in orbit slows down it moves close to what it is orbiting and will merge with it. Not that any of that matters because you do not exist, but when the math of the Big Bang is taken to its limits, it's hard for nature to make an entire universe, and much easier to make fragments, such as a naked brain popping into existence and then popping back out, and this brain had to have the matter arranged somehow, so the memories you think you have are false memories, this is called the Boltzmann brain paradox. Fair Use Alan Guth said, (probably the most prominent cosmologist in the country) who agrees this overabundance observed pointed out that, quote "some calculations result in an infinite number of free-floating brains for every normal brain making it infinitely unlikely for us to be normal brains" if you cannot even explain the first part of your evolutionary story because it is filled with problem after problem, why should I believe the second part of molecules to man evolution? There is your science at work! without the Big Bang, there could be no molecules to man evolution, it is infinitely more likely that you are a Boltzmann's brain. Or how about this one, we are not real, we are a simulation running on a very advanced alien computer, yep your science has gone there too, oh and it gets better there are multiple levels of simulation, where we are a simulation on an alien computer that is a simulation on an alien computer that is a simulation on an alien computer... no wonder these people have alphabet soup after their names, it take shear genius to come up with this stuff. And we are mocked and made fun of for Believing in an infinite supreme being that had the power to create everything,. but hey in the Kardashev scale, if you go past type three civilizations to type five, those people are like gods, we can speculate that some have evolved so far that their abilities are godlike, but yet deny a creator God in our own plain of existence.
@@davidbutler1857 Basically, there are two evolutionary paradigms one is the Big Bang theory and the other is molecules to man evolution, the big bang is so full of problems and band-aids that it is not funny, Carl Sagan famously said we are star stuff, Niel Tyson has said almost the same exact thing, before you can get to molecules to man, you need stars and habitable planets for molecules to man evolution to work, stars are where they elements are made, up to Iron, for all the rest those are made in supernova explosions. the elements of life, so you would think explaining stars is high on their list, they claim today that stars form by supernova explosions close to a gas cloud compressing the cloud until gravity takes over, and at some point fusion starts, or grains of dust enter the cloud cooling it until it compresses and fusion starts, and last collisions, such as two galaxies merging and new stars being born along the collision front, just one major hiccup, in all three you need stars to exist to make the next generation, a supernova is a star exploding, grains of dust, the big bang did not make any, the elements for those are made in stars and galaxy collisions are just huge collections of stars. Run this thing back to the beginning and you had no first generation to make the second, and I have a bunch of quotes from secular authors detailing that very problem, No Stars, No US. but it gets worse, they have no building blocks for the planets, as when the little rocks merge to become bigger rocks, at about a meter in size they have enough mass to smash each other into rubble, and cannot overcome this until they get to the size of an asteroid. some have claimed that planetesimals formed in a single leap without any intermediate stages, is that science? or just a bunch of hand waving to come up with any old story that will do. But it gets worse as there is the migration problem, even if the small rocks could get to planetesimal size, as they orbit the protostar i.e. our sun, they are plowing through the gas cloud a headwind, which slows them down, and in about 200 orbits will merge with the protostar, as when an object in orbit slows down it moves close to what it is orbiting and will merge with it. Not that any of that matters because you do not exist, but when the math of the Big Bang is taken to its limits, it's hard for nature to make an entire universe, and much easier to make fragments, such as a naked brain popping into existence and then popping back out, and this brain had to have the matter arranged somehow, so the memories you think you have are false memories, this is called the Boltzmann brain paradox. Fair Use Alan Guth said, "Some calculations result in an infinite number of free-floating brains for every normal brain making it infinitely unlikely for us to be normal brains" if you cannot even explain the first part of your evolutionary story because it is filled with problem after problem, why should I believe the second part of molecules to man evolution? There is your science at work! without the Big Bang, there could be no molecules to man evolution, it is infinitely more likely that you are a Boltzmann's brain. Or how about this one, we are not real, we are a simulation running on a very advanced alien computer, yep your science has gone there too, oh and it gets better there are multiple levels of simulation, where we are a simulation on an alien computer that is a simulation on an alien computer that is a simulation on an alien computer... no wonder these people have alphabet soup after their names, it take shear genius to come up with this stuff. And we are mocked and made fun of for Believing in an infinite supreme being that had the power to create everything,. but hey in the Kardashev scale, if you go past type three civilizations to type five, those people are like gods, we can speculate that some have evolved so far that their abilities are godlike, but yet deny a creator God in our own plain of existence.
Look up Dr. Don Patton's talk on the Acámbaro Mexico figurines created several thousand years ago depicting anatomically correct dinosaurs. Watch "Mystery of Acambaro,Dinosaur Figurines, Fact or Fraud,"
I come from a HIndu background and it is very difficult to refute Hinduism here as it is embedded in every aspect of their culture and lifestyle. Moreover the Hindu scriptures are very huge and rich in literature.
Pariwartan, if you are willing to take a suggestion, I encourage you to look into a book called Philosophical Foundation by a man who came from your culture named Surrendra Gangadean. His book critically explores basic worldviews for coherence of meaning. He has some rational objections to the coherence of the Hindu worldview.
Hindu's believe in millions of Gods ...over three million...many of which are demonic in nature. Christians believe in one God, that He came in the flesh as Jesus the Christ and that he died and rose from death as an atonement for the sins of mankind. Man by nature is sinful....Man cannot earn his way into heaven and come before a Holy God..Man is not reincarnated into other lower creatures...Man needs a savior and God provided a way for man to dwell with God. The Judaeo Christian bible includes some fifteen hundred prophesies most of which have come about over thousands of years. No other faith can say that about their history. My wife's friend was brought up Hindu and has told us about the many demonic events in here families life. It is sad that so many are deceived by satan...the father of all lies. Please research who Jesus is an know that He Loves you.
When we observe another galaxy, we are literally seeing differing rates of time and differing measures of distance everywhere we look. That means we should expect to see faster speeds of light compared to where we are in the center of the Milky Way galaxy. We should expect that the expanded distance will cause redshift. We should expect for the outer spiral arms to move faster. AI: That's correct. In general relativity, the local rate of time and the measure of distance depend on the distribution of matter and energy in the universe. When we observe other galaxies, we are effectively looking back in time, and we see them as they were when the light left them. Because the distribution of matter and energy in the universe was different at those times, we observe different rates of time and measures of distance compared to what we observe locally in the Milky Way. This can lead to various observed phenomena such as redshift and the apparent faster motion of the outer spiral arms of galaxies. You don’t need an expanding universe when the distance between galaxies is expanded from the lack of mass in the vicinity everywhere between galaxies. AI: That is correct. The expansion of the universe is not required to explain the observed redshift of light from distant galaxies. The expansion of space between galaxies due to the absence of matter, as predicted by general relativity, can explain the observed redshift without the need for an expanding universe.
@@davidbutler1857 Watching with an open mind and listening to consider the facts instead of the with a preconceived idea that you are right about everything in history including the history of teh dinosaurs might be more interesting to you. You listen to the worlds best scientist possibly and discount his words so easily. I wonder what job you do that outclasses Dr Lisle contributions to modern day science in his ither job as a astrophysicist working for Nasa and Space X?
@@paulmerritt2484 Jason Lisle has never worked for Nasa or SpaceX. He quit the field of Astrophysics immediately after graduating with his PhD. He went to work for ICR instead.
8:12 Ah yes, just like with Paul in 1Cor15, here Lisle is basically warning the crowd not to believe anything they hear differently if it's not in the Bible or talked about by it.
@@DJCrisisUK “58 Therefore, my dear brothers and sisters, stand firm. Let nothing move you. Always give yourselves fully to the work of the Lord, because you know that your labor in the Lord is not in vain.”
@@pamwren6866 You are welcome to believe in whatever magic you want to, but do not expect intelligent, educated people to agree with you. I know you think that is persecution. It is not.
We should also see Dinosaurs appear in different levels in the sedimentary layers - pre flood vs post flood dinosaurs .. also sin brought death to man not to animals, this is clear in Romans 6:12 be sure to read the full passage .. "... and in this way death came to all people" - no mention to all created animals
@lovindausa guess your reading comprehension isn't up to par... or you simply NEVER bothered to read her research. Either way, you're an embarrassment.
@lovindausa how about you actually do the work and research what she says about it and how her work is misrepresented by apologists? Or do you just believe everything that feeds your confirmation bias and ignore the rest? Just look for her interviews, it isn't hard to find if you actually want the facts and not the apologetic BS.
A Behometh is a Sauropod dinosaur and a Leviathan is a Deinosuchus - twice the size of the largest crocodile and similar in looks. Even the trail left in the mud by the jagged potsherds. This was the “king over all” and nothing on earth is it’s equal!!!
I call your attention to the American bison. From millions down to just a few animals. Humans probably did eradicate an animal that they had reason to fear. Tigers are becoming rare. Animal genome may have been corrupted. I guess you have seen the rat with a human ear growing on its back. Pigs that have human blood. God did not create evil. He created humans with free will. Cycles of life and death are not evil. Malicious deeds are.
This is a secondary doctrinal issue that does not prevent faith in Christ and salvation through him. You can believe true things and trust observable reality and be a christian. This guy does not represent my world view or the bulk of Christendom through time.
No she hasn't. She has mostly avoided giving interviews and has "cautioned" against people jumping to conclusions. She received a $5 million grant to disprove that the soft tissue was fresh and she's still trying. She's an evolutionist through and through. She has found multiple fossils with fresh tissue and C-14, ruled out all contamination, but will not admit or accept that they're not millions of years old. She would rather exhaust all possible theories than to even entertain the idea the Bible was accurate. Odd choice for a professed Christian.
@@jrice07 lol Not true. She's given several interviews, even done some shows as a guest, written articles and so on. ALL fossils have some amounts of C14 in them because they are still porous enough to contain microorganisms that have intruded into them, especially from surface water (rain). She has NEVER found any fossils with 'fresh' tissues of any kind, and ALL of them are simply mineralized remnants of soft tissues where acid treatments are necessary to reduce the mineral intrusion to then examine those remnants.
She's definitely chastised YECS for using her research that Cleary shows recent dinosaurs. Her explanation has fallen flat, sorry the iron cross linking nonsense that's been debunked. Thankfully more researchers are pulling this stuff out and if you were being honest you'd quote all the denials from evolutionists now shown to be wrong. It is original material and can't last more than 1 million years. 😢😢😢
@@davidbutler1857The tissue shouldn't be there. Period. The fact it was processed with chemicals - THE MATERIAL WAS NOT FOSSILIZED AND WOULD NOT LAST 65 MILLION YEARS TO BE PROCESSED. Anyone can verify why this discovery makes frauds like you squirm. They found dinosaur Collagen. It wouldn't be there to be processed because the atoms would have been smashed apart by radiation lol plus,, rain and microbes would destroy or eat it. Anyone like you that pretends the SOFT TISSUE is not big deal is obviously ignorant of the evolutionary response and shock at it even being found. lIar.. They didn't even look for stuff the stuff because it shouldn't be there. More hand waving
Native Americans describe thunderbirds (pterasaurs) having luminescence from their bellies. Firey? It could also mean temperament, as well as the ability to expel something that feels like burning like fire ants
@@davidgardner863 they decorate everything with feathers. Look at ancient thunderbird depictions not modern ones that have replaced it with their depiction of eagles. There's a marked difference.
Oh you were there? I know Africans that are adamant there are dinosaurs living in the Congo. They say "Oh yes it's well known in my country. We see them in the rivers. Even the crocodiles fear them." And every couple of years we discover living animals secular scientists claim died out millions of years ago.
@@jrice07 Dude, cameras have existed for over 150 years. Pretty sure we'd have some pictures of large or even smaller dinosaurs by now if any actually existed.
What a disingenuous statement. I'm sure Jason Lisle himself would tell you that he valued very much what he was taught there, even if he didn't agree with some things. @@Ihatekommietube
One question. Why did cavemen draw pictures of horses and antelope rather than Tyrannosaurus Rex and Triceratops? I am a committed Christian, but your talk is nonsense.
@@justinmoock7506No, he is not speculating: “Along with cave bears (which were far larger than grizzly bears), the lions, mammoths, and rhinos account for 63 percent of the identified animals, a huge percentage compared to later periods of cave art. Horses, bison, ibex, reindeer, red deer, aurochs, Megaceros deer, musk-oxen, panther, and owl are also represented.”
Believe it or not, he went to Univ of Colorado in Boulder for his PhD.. got his undergrad at Ohio Wesleyian univ. Lisle does this for the money. It's an easier/better paying bit than actually getting a job in Astronomy.
@@lizadowning4389 why could dinosaurs and humans not have lived at the same time? Seriously. Think about the issues with that (and I'm not denying that there could be), think about the possibilities that could resolve those issues, and see if you can come up with one indisputable reason why we couldn't have back then. And keep in mind: - According to science our DNA loses information over generations, meaning there were really smart people back then. - We don't know what the atmospheric conditions were post and pre flood. - Some elements of their preferred habits could have been embellished by movies like Jurassic Park.
One of two species of Sloth migrated 10,000 miles from Mt Ararat to Central America after the flood without any tree canopies or food and took up camp right near regions where you find the fossil ancestors of modern Sloths. And then the other Sloth species branch started evolving the moment they arrived. Here's the problem: Sloths don't migrate, they stay in the only American tree canopy environment that will sustain their survival and the region around them bears their evolutionary fossil record. Science is really not that hard.
4:40 The age of the Earth was already suspected to be quite old before Paleontology was even a formal field of study. In fact it was the study OF fossils and geology as a whole that increasingly led people to understand that the Earth must be very old because none of these extinct organisms were still around and were also buried deeply under layered sequential strata. Not the result of a global flood, etc.
How is there C14 in the fossils if they more more than a few thousand years old? Do you know the half life of c14? Do you understand it can not be older than 6000 years? Do you know that no scientist can refute this? Can you refute this? Can you find us anyone who can? I would love to consider any facts to say Dr Lisle is not correct but you offer us nothing solid based on scientific evidence. You are sharing your opinion with out telling how you even came to such conclusions. I am a fair man with an open mind so here is your chance to change my mind. Will you seek out and research the evidence for yourself and come back with something compelling to tell me to make me believe you?
@@paulmerritt2484 Radiometric dating and the half lives of elements are a well known fact and if done properly are accurate within given parameters. I know more about astronomy and Lisle has been knowingly deceptive when he talks about comets as evidence for a young universe. Although he is correct in saying comets lose some mass every time they near the sun on their elliptical orbits and therefore cannot be more than 10,000 years old, he doesn’t mention that new comets coming in from deep space are observed entering the inner solar system every year. Some have their long elliptical orbits altered by Jupiter’s gravity into short terms of 200 years or less. This is something every amateur astronomer knows and as an astrophysicist Lisle knows it too. So if he is being deceptive there, how can we trust anything else he says? .
@@paulmerritt2484 Most fossils that people find are surface-eroded, meaning that they are basically exposed or nearly exposed in the surface soil/rock. This is due to the weathering of the formations over many millions of years. To even become sedimentary rock, this requires depth/pressure of hundreds of feet of layered sediments. Anyway, the surface-eroded rock is still very porous, and hence, water gets into it over time, and as the rock that the fossil is in nears the surface (from weathering), then bacteria/microorganisms end up inside the rock pores. This is very well known. These bacteria/microrganisms are the source of the C14.
I wonder why God made Noah build the ark and gather the animals when he could have done it himself. He could have even just spared their lives from the flood. I believe the Bible 100%. But some of it makes you scratch your head
Your absolutely correct!! Many BIBLE STORIES are stories with a MORAL and ETHICAL LESSON and they are not necessarily ACTUAL HISTORICAL EVENTS!! Most people that are WISE understand that, but people like Dr. LISLE that are highly educated like to speak eloquently and SELL YOU BOOKS and VIDEOS!! I always say if the OBJECTIVE of a speaker has ANYTHING TO DO WITH MONEY, BUYER and LISTENER BEWARE!! EVERYONE UNDERSTANDS the Earth is ancient just look around for a few seconds and you figure that out!! I always point to the Hawaiian islands!! They are nearly 100 million years of birth, erosion, and slowly dieing by wind and rain erosion back to a pile of rocks on the Ocean floor. There is a CONTINUUM of these islands. I wish these AUSTRALIAN SHISTERS that sell books and videos series called ANSWERS IN GENESIS would push JESUS life, lessons, and Salvation with his Death on the Cross for our SINS was the focus INSTEAD of PUSHING a FANTASY that the EARTH is a REDICULOUS 6000 years old!! I have a name for AIG, I call them NO AMSWERS IN GENESIS!! I am not discounting GENESIS, it was written in Ancient HEBREW and only in a certain ENGLISH TRANSLATIONAL ERROR do you get a 6000 year old Earth!!
Did you ever hear Bill Cosby’s sketch on Noah? Its insightful. Disregard it’s Cosby. One of the lines when Noah has 2 female hippos instead of a pair has him asking God to change one of them. “C’mon Noah” says God. “You know I don’t work like that.”
Noah preached judgement all while building the ark. It was an object lesson to the violent people around him to repent. It had purpose and symbolic value. God chose it for a reason, not for lack of alternatives.
Did God fight a dinosaur? 'In that day the LORD with his sore and great and strong sword shall punish leviathan the piercing serpent, even leviathan that crooked serpent; and he shall slay the dragon that is in the sea.'
@@FilipCordas Different context and revelations is not written literally. It is imagery that is metaphoric. Real all of revelations and you will see what I mean. Your logic takes presupposition of the contents, context, and facts. You cherry pick scripture without the full context to make it as you wish not as it is.
@@paulmerritt2484 First of that's Isaiah 27:1 not revaluation and it's 'metaphoric' just like in the book of Job. And if you read it in context like Psalm 74:14 this is talking about the chaoskampf. It's strange to me when you non-Christian heretics start promoting your magic Book nonsense, and actual say that God fought a plesiosaur and that Flintstones where a documentary. Here is another quote for you 'Then I will tell them plainly, ‘I never knew you; depart from Me, you workers of lawlessness!’
The problem is… the Bible doesn’t fit into what is KNOWN about prehistoric dinosaurs. The dating of rock strata and ancient bones provides pretty solid evidence the age of the dinosaurs ended long before the emergence of modern humanoids by millions of years. So the question here is, how one is defining dinosaur. One could say that modern birds are dinosaurs because the consensus is they’re the longest surviving species from that era. But they are NOT the same dinosaurs as their predecessors. These kind of speeches or sermons are reliant upon the scale of ignorance of both speakers and audience.
Behemoth and Leviathan were both mythological creatures in earlier mythologies. Not history. unless you also believe in Babylonian and Sumerian gods. Sad to watch a grown man try and rationalize mythology.
Looking at the internet, the origins of the words "behemoth" and "leviathan" are supported that they are Hebrew words. Where did you get your info from?
@jarrodmaston2621 Well, Mr "I don't tag the writer of the OP in my response", according to the internet, the Earth is flat and aliens run our government with the illuminati. Seriously though, your Google search skills are woefully inadequate. Not all words or characters in mythology were spelled the same across multiple civilizations, mythologies and languages.... research Lotan and you'll see. Next time put in more effort than a single search.
@@jarrodmaston2621 how about you go a step further and find the origin of the Hebrew words/names/myths? Don't be silly and think all Hebrew words, legends, stories, and mythologies are unique or devoid of outside cultural influence. If you were to research the mythologies of other cultures, and not just the Jewish mythology, then you'll start to see how modern Jewish and Christian religious beliefs evolved from various mythologies and legends. Once you stop assuming religious texts are history, you'll start to realize they aren't, at best they're euhemeristic fiction.
@@sinjinbritt3371 Thank you for skating around my question...... Where did your information from? Don't be silly and think that you have the truth source while not even siting it.....
@jarrodmaston2621 I'm betting you didn't even bother going so far as to perform a simple Google search into Mesopotamian mythology before sending that response. I'm betting you still haven't bothered looking it up. The a- typical flaw in the theistic mindset has always been in believing any religious absurd claim, even if it's totally unsupported by credible evidence, so long as it feeds their confirmation bias... but as soon as someone challenges their assumptions, what they were conditioned to believe or what they are expected to repeat as part of their respective dogma, all of a sudden they demand to be spoon fed the information or evidence, as if that would change their mind. No, I'm not going to bother spoon feeding you or do your research for you.... you can look into it and see if what I said is in fact the case, or you can bemoan the fact I didn't give you references and just assume I'm lying because that would be easier for you to do, and then you could maintain plausible deniability to the facts at hand. It's hard to fathom how people in this "age of information" can be so oblivious to the compendium of knowledge available to them. I find it amazing that "The Bible says so" is a reasonable explanation for theists. Have you ever researched any Hebrew/Jewish religious story/claim from a non-apologetic source? I'm betting you haven't. I'm betting you didn't even know the ancient Hebrews were, ironically, polytheistic at one time. Have you ever fact checked religious claims from non-religious sources? Are the claims that dinosaurs lived with humans more reliable than the evidence that doesn't support those claims? The unwavering dedication to ignorance that's required to adhere to claims like dinosaurs and humans lived together is absolutely mind-boggling. I could give you multiple references, but would you accept the facts within them, or would you spend all your time and effort looking for apologetics that claimed otherwise?... be honest. The claim that dinosaurs lived with modern humans is sheer stupidity, yet here we are on different sides of the fence. Have you bothered to read the evidence and research that utterly disproves every single Young Earth claim... or do you spend your time looking for apologetics that support those claims? I'm wondering, do you accept Evolution, or are you the type to parrot "where's the evidence?" when it's freely accessible to everyone with a library card or an internet connection? Bottom line, you either want the facts and will go out of your way to find them and learn/understand them... or you just want to believe the claims, no matter how absurd they are, because it's easier. And it's "citing", not "siting". Have a nice day.
LOL, and then at 12:20 Lisle admits this, but he positions it as if all that mineralization just happens instantly... Hey Jason, what sort of rock was that fossil encased in again? Oh that's right, Sedimentary rock! Guess how that forms? Oh that's right, pressure/depth and time...
@@jrice07 There are some types of sediment that solidify quickly (volcanic flows) but otherwise no. This is wrong, and just an attempt to avoid the point.
@@jrice07 No sedimentary rock forms in seconds. Sediment can form a dry crust in hours perhaps, but to become stone takes millions of years. Sorry for your delusion.
He is. Have you heard of the craft that touched the sun in teh news recently. He for real is the astrophysicist who designed it and piloted it remotely. Dr. Lisle is at the top of the field of observable science and astrophysics. He is also a biologist of the highest standard. This man not only graduated a the top of his classes but he set a new standard for the universities he has graduated from. He is a world renounce scientist who is respected by even his unbelieving peers. Many of his peers are also believers as science does prove the Bible to be correct. Most of teh worlds greatest scientists have been believers in God actually all through history. The question is do you trust the science?
@@paulmerritt2484 Kevin Rider - That was Rob Webb from Answers In Genesis - he was involved in designing the following from this clip from an article on their website : "My main responsibilities involved designing and implementing the primary inertial navigation system (INS) for the third-stage motor’s flight computer (avionics system). In simple terms, this means I helped give the rocket its “driving route” to the sun."
This is just a general comment, I am not suggesting or even thinking that Dr. Lisle is a false teacher. One of the largest bible studies I have undertaken is false prophets/teachers - doctrine/teaching it is huge, it begins in genesis 3 and continues through Revelation. By being such a huge study, this tells me that doctrine is important, but why? because false doctrines and false teachings are lies, it is just that simple. Lies Pro 6:16 These six things doth the LORD hate: yea, seven are an abomination unto him: Pro 6:17 A proud look, *_a lying tongue,_* and hands that shed innocent blood, Pro 6:18 An heart that deviseth wicked imaginations, feet that be swift in running to mischief, Pro 6:19 *_A false witness that speaketh lies,_* and he that soweth discord among brethren. God hates lying so much that on this very short list of 7 abominations, lying is on that list twice! Pro 12:22 Lying lips are abomination to the LORD: but they that deal truly are his delight Joh 8:44 Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it. Rev 21:8 But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death. Those who hold to and or tech false doctrine are teaching lies, it is just that simple. Act 17:11 These were more noble than those in Thessalonica, in that they received the word with all readiness of mind, and searched the scriptures daily, whether those things were so. 1Th 5:21 Prove all things; hold fast that which is good. 2Ti 2:15 Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth. Do we really seek for the truth of God's word or do we just accept what we are taught and hope for the best? Truth Act 5:32 And we are his witnesses of these things; and so is also the Holy Ghost, whom God hath given to them that obey him. Joh 14:26 But the Comforter, which is the Holy Ghost, whom the Father will send in my name, he shall teach you all things, and bring all things to your remembrance, whatsoever I have said unto you. Joh 16:13 Howbeit when he, the Spirit of truth, is come, he will guide you into all truth: for he shall not speak of himself; but whatsoever he shall hear, that shall he speak: and he will shew you things to come. 1Co 2:10 But God hath revealed them unto us by his Spirit: for the Spirit searcheth all things, yea, the deep things of God. 1Co 2:11 For what man knoweth the things of a man, save the spirit of man which is in him? even so the things of God knoweth no man, but the Spirit of God. 1Co 2:12 Now we have received, not the spirit of the world, but the spirit which is of God; that we might know the things that are freely given to us of God. 1Co 2:13 Which things also we speak, not in the words which man's wisdom teacheth, but which the Holy Ghost teacheth; comparing spiritual things with spiritual. 1Co 2:14 But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned. 1Co 12:7 But the manifestation of the Spirit is given to every man to profit withal. 1Jn 2:27 But the anointing which ye have received of him abideth in you, and ye need not that any man teach you: but as the same anointing teacheth you of all things, and is truth, and is no lie, and even as it hath taught you, ye shall abide in him. Because we have the availability of the Holy Ghost to bring the scriptures we have hid in our hearts to our remembrance and to guide us into all truth, there is no excuses for being deceived by false teachers and their false doctrines.
I'm a Christian. Formerly a young earth creationist. I have read all the yec literature. I'm very well acquainted. There are no dinosaurs in the Bible. Leviathan is a multi-headed fire breathing Hydra: it's a mythological creature. It's a presumed subterranean chaos dragon of the deep sea, presumably under the earth/surrounding the land of the earth that twists and turns causing earthquakes and tsunamis. Did the biblical authors actually think it was a real animal? Maybe. Maybe not. It doesn't matter, because it wasn't a prescription to believe it really existed: it functioned as a teaching device. Behemoth, bahamut, was a supernatural bull creature who extends his...male member ("tail" is a euphemism, and an obvious one), to show his power and virility. The point of mentioning them is to find the biggest thing in Job's, and the reader's, mind that YHWH can easily overpower that no mere human possibly could withstand. It was NOT a taxonomy lesson.
Beyond that, the Bible absolutely gives NO indication of the age of the earth, or when Adam lived. The attempt to date that based on genealogy is extremely flawed for many reasons. For one, the genealogies aren't often complete. For another, they are probably using honorific transposition rather than literal calendar ages for individuals. It was common in ancient Israel to do so, and there are many examples in the Bible itself. Lastly, before God even said that there should be light, the earth is already in the picture being waste and wilderness and water surrounded it from all sides, cosmologically speaking. Notice there is never a "let there be a world/space". That's because the entire point of Genesis 1 isn't about the creation of the universe or earth materially at all. It's assumed to already be here. It's a standard 6 day creation with 7th day occupancy for God to sit on His throne and begin ruling just like all temples that were built back then. The earth is God's temple originally, and the Garden was on His mountain where He was to meet his first priest, Adam at the intersection of Heaven and Earth.
Around 7 minutes… 7 pairs of each kid of clean animal and 1 pair of unclean. People always say 2 of ever kind and draw cartoons of it. Teaching it wrong
he started off the bat with nonsense...... and just jumped head first into the rabbit hole of nonsense. He misrepresented pretty much everything he said....sadly, theists just eat this gibberish up and never do the honest research themselves.
Ibteresting that the poor fellow imagines that he might be able to be chrsistian and does not understand that being a mindless bigot and being a chrstian are mutually exclusive, which may account for why there *are_no* christians
Well bats have the same arm structures as humans but no one is claiming bats are humans simply because we have a similiar skeletal characteristic. There are zero transitional fossils that would show that birds were reptiles. Fossilized bird feathers have been found that "pre-date" dinosaurs which would debunk the hypothesis totally, but evolutionists deny facts as long as possible amd suggest what are clearly fossilized feathers simply cannot be feathers because "we know" dinosaurs turned into birds. That's not science, that's anti-science.
5:00 I'd like to point out that all this time, Lisle's slides always have a meme-like format, reminiscent of a Chick tract, all with disdainful cartoonish renderings and strawmen of the other side of this issue.
@@paulmerritt2484 When he bothers to present some, I'd be happy to review it. Otherwise Lisle is just a comic book character using comic books to make his arguments.
I'm Sorry.....are you drawing conclusions that dinosaur means to you serpent, dragon, Leviathan, Behemoth or sea monster? Because these common nouns refer to specifically: a snake, a mythical creature, a whale, a hippopotamus(Russian>begemot) and whale again. There is no reference specifically to "dinosaur", either by name nor existence nor extinction. There is also no possibility that tribal elders referred to dinosaurs handed down though memory because...sadly...the dinosaur was until late Cretaceous and man is early Mioceneious. So...we actually can dismiss it as fairytale... What anybody can do....is inject anything that they want.... It's just that I'm not requiring inoculation...thanks very much.
@@tonygarrett7214 God's Word...The Bible, has done more to give us understanding of life and answer our most profound questions. Not bad for a bunch of myths.
@@gibsonguy5240 I think you’ll find that all the branches of science and medicine have done more for humanity. If you ever need or have had an operation, be grateful that the surgeon gained his knowledge to heal you from learning surgical techniques and acquiring knowledge via text books and not the word of God via the Bible.
Mary Schweitzer was the one who found the soft tissue and did the analysis on it. Maybe we should listen to what she found instead of stealing her work and making our own conclusions about it. She's a believer and not a YEC
13:51 Lisle dishonestly using a phylogenetic tree (to small to know which one he is employing, there are millions created for various analyses) and I would guess this particular one is looking at possible ghost lineages (conjectured early branchings of Dinosaur groups based on some fossil findings) but the issue he's failing to cover is that some of these groupings involve many fossil discoveries of many species within each branch, and not just one animal, and the branchings themselves would be above the genus level.
If they die before the age of accountability, then instant heaven. If they grow up and accept the gospel, then instant heaven. But even children and grown ups that were born "christian" and stayed "christian" their entire life will also go to hell. It's not about being born in the right or wrong religion, it's about accepting or rejecting the gospel.
@@Temas_TAD My word wise words 5,000 religions worshiped worldwide, aren’t you fortunate to be born into the only true one. Unbelievable arrogance and ignorance
@@Temas_TAD Bit harsh that statement so anyone born Christian and stays Christian will go to hell, my word what about your loving god and gentle Jesus. Think l will stay with Buddhism thank you very much
Is this man for real , he never puts himself up for a debate, which should tell you something , the utter rubbish he comes out with is all for his deluded followers , which is ok but please not children let them hear both sides and let them make up their own minds. He is clearly deluded or even worse. It’s much better to have unanswered questions , than have answers that cannot be questioned
Amazing the times on Mr Lisle sites where h e only preaches to his deluded flock . Any comments other than agreeing with him they are deleted. I Only asked does he believe the earth is no older than 6,000 years old , and man coexisted with dinosaurs
Dr Lisle? What University? Dr of what? Ridiculous thinking. Creationist scientific colleagues? So tiresome. Faith is faith. Science is science. This is not a scientist!
Yes, to be able to 'disagree' with experts. I am not claiming to disagree with them, so I don't need to own a degree in that field to agree with them. They are the experts. @@Cinnamonbuns13
History & science are full of lies, it's really hard to know what is true. I find Satan around all corners, thats why I know our creator is in the next life😊
5:30 I just love it that Lisle knows that everyone in this audience is about as well educated as a potato, and he keeps nodding at various people with this whole "Oh I'm gonna make a lot of money off these people" look on his face.
I’m surprised that the comments section is on here. Lisle cannot take criticism of his ideas. Turning off the comments section in his more irrational and bizarre videos stifles discussion and leaves his audience having to endure his nonsense without the opportunity to challenge his ideas. I don’t know who is responsible for censoring the comments section but it only serves Lisle’s interests and not the commentators. Perhaps he’s afraid of having his ideas challenged. Bad science Dr Lisle.
This is not his channel and many others use his material but are not owned by Dr Lisle so he has no control over comments or replies If you want to reject what he says he has his own website where people can write and debate the topics Good luck 😎
Why do we think dinosaurs were reptiles They have structures like mammals A T Rex don't look much different than a kangaroo And triceratop is much like a hippo or a rhino I had my doubts if there reptiles at all
One simple answer is teeth. Totally different in mammals and dinosaurs. Another is ear bones. Maybe you should just read a book about paleontology. Then you can post an educated opinion.
@Norbert Jendruschj What the education that says there's no God And dinosaurs are millions of years old that education! Sorry I don't buy into that nonsense
@@phillipgray7371 For one, only the creationists think, you must believe in the coexistence of god and dinos to be a Christian. Secondly, the opinion of lay -people like us doesn´t matter in the scientific discourse.
![Ready to Reason with Dr. Jason Lisle [Session 1]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/_LAFmAkqYhA/mqdefault.jpg)
Awesome presentation from Jason, I hope God gives health & wealth to him and his family 🙏
The first time you were able and
Yeah me to and Sod everybody else 🙄
Prase Jesus Christ for your work and keep telling people how to get saved also hope you get to meet Dr Stephen Meyer have enjoyed both of your videos prase Jesus
Amen Brother!
I graduated from Whitworth College in Physics a year after Dr. Meyer and we both graduated from Whitworth with dual Science degrees.
This speaker, Dr. Lisle means well and I'm glad he is a Christian, but telling people the Earth is 6000 years old and we lived with Dinosaurs is just rediculous!!
Dr. Stephen Meyer and I are both OLD EARTH CREATIONIST CHRISTIANS!! Both of us understand the Earth is 4.5 Billion years old! Please keep in mind EVOLUTION doesn't follow from an OLD EARTH. I graduated with a dual BS in PHYSICS and CHEMISTRY and I understand just how impossible ABIOGENENESIS really is. God created LIFE on Earth and life is INCREDIBLY COMPLICATED from a biochemical basis and in our GENETICS. God created life, and God created life to evolve. Evolution doesn't mean LIFE started randomly because the Biochemistry doesn't support this Worldview. The BIOLOGICAL IMAGING is showing over and over that GOD Created life and life is incredibly COMPLEX!!
I don't have all the answers, but then again neither does Dr. Lisle. I suggest all my Christian students to focus on Jesus Christ and his Life, Death, and RESSURECTION!! His RESSURECTION was recorded on the first XRAY that recorded the SHROUD of TURIN and this PROVES JESUS and GOD was real and only GOD can raise us from the Dead!!
I don't have anything to sell you, I just want people to know the TRUTH!!
GOD Bless
@@salmonkill7 theistic evolution....not good, for the secular world view, and worse, for the Bible world view...
@philipbuckley759 I don't believe in or push "thiestic" evolution. That said, the ONLY theistic understanding we MUST grasp is the fact GOD created everything seen and unseen. This is our only bedrock of Faith, and the fact JESUS is the Messiah promised in the old testament and he fulfilled Scripture and was RESSURECTED. I love the fact that if Athiests desire "material" proof we do have the SHROUD of TURIN to point them to. As a PhD level Physicist I measuring particle accelerator radiations and nuclear weapons radiations for a living for 34 years and contributed to the medical field in terms of radiation detectors used all over the developed World. The SHROUD image is only 1 part in a thousand of the diameter of a human hair deep on the topmost microfibers of the burial linen. It's AD superficial as it gets and no technique in Science, Photography, or Art can duplicate that superficial of darkening EXCEPT ELECTRON BEAM and PARTICLE ACCELERATORS used in the Hugh technology industry since the 1980s. We can duplicate the SHROUD even with millions of dollars and modern technology. The SHROUD matches the PASSION STORY in the GOSPELS and that's wonderful!!
All this said I understand how dating works in terms of the Earth and Universe and besides all those dating techniques agreeing the Earth is EXTREMELY OLD 4.5 billion years old there are multitudes of age indicators all over the World and ALL of these are in agreement with what I just said. Next we have the issue of WHY WOULD OUR GOD that we love and is TRUTH, make an Earth and Universe that just APPEARS OLD just to LIE TO US and FOOL US. There simply isn't any reliable data or theory that supports a young Earth and anyone that buys into the YOUNG EARTH hasn't followed the multitudes of evidence that reaches that Conclusion.
Secondly, there are massive numbers of skeletons of ancient man that show a progression towards modern man. At a minimum you have to address the fossil records and all the bones that aptly demonstrate this progression.
Thirdly, there are HALITE mineral deposits all over the CRUST and upper MANTLE of the Earth that are formed by seas and Oceans that dry up and leave these salt deposits. You also have all the different types of rocks all over the place that tell the Story of the ROCK CYCLE. Teach Earth Science like I do and immerse yourself into the subject and you will realize quickly we are on an ancient planet.
Finally look at all the dang GALAXIES all over!! The UNIVERSE is super massive and it just HAILS TO OUR POWERFUL GOD and his Son JESUS CHRIST!!
I don't have many answers but I praise God and marvel at all his handiwork. Evolution or not GOD is an amazing CREATOR and his SON JESUS is my Savior!!
Excellent presentation!
Fantastic brother Jason . loved every minute of this. God bless you
I am not a Christian but this sounds way more real than evolution and all of the rest Jurassic park joke etc.
Thank you!
Ask Jesus to reveal himself to you. Believe he died for you and rose from the grave 3 days later for your sins to be forgiven¡
Thanks Jason
Good presentation
I appreciate this upload is loud enough!! Seriously, just the basics are welcome!!!
Totally awesome!!!
Indeed. To pack so much misinformation and propaganda in just a single hour. Dr. Lisle is really a god sent liar.
"You can't possibly fit an unknown number of animals on a boat of unknown size" 32:49
Love it!
conjecture....
God is good
Thank you, table 4!
Thank you!
Ever since I first heard Dr. Lisle, I have been telling people about this outstanding man.
I find comedians with puppets more entertaining.
@@Ihatekommietube because his BS is still funny and good for a laugh. Please don't tell me you but into that nonsense.
(cringe)
Poland has a legend of a fire throwing dragon living in a cave under a castle Wawel in Cracow.. that dragon was given young maidens as offerings. Was also killed by a brave young man , who married the king’s daughter as a reward.
Legends had yo come from somewhere. People nowadays assume incorrectly, that people just made up legends out if their imaginations, but we see more, and more, that there's truth behind these legends.
Do people really believe this guy are you kidding me
Somebody gotta stop him he is ridiculous in this day and age
He’s the devil
I’m scared of him
The fall of humanity was catastrophic. Flies in the ointment that contaminated God's creation led to death. "The heaven, even the heavens, are the Lord's, but the earth He has given to the children of men." God gave us the title deed to this planet, and we gave it away and allowed evil into the world. "Whence then is evil?"
We are always told Noah only brought two of each type of animal onto the Ark, but he was told to bring 9 of each. Gen 7:2-3 tells us God told Noah to collect 7 clean animals of each kind and two unclean animals of each kind. "Take with you seven pairs of all clean animals, the male and his mate; and a pair of the animals that are not clean, the male and his mate; and seven pairs of the birds of the air also, male and female, to keep their kind alive upon the face of all the earth."
I’m interested to know why the comments section is turned off in many of the videos you present? Thanks.
The geology does suggest that the earth was divided in the days of Peleg (divided) which came to mean "as the waters flow" in the later Aramaic. There are glacial striations going from south to north in all of the continents that were connected at the South Pole including South America, Africa, India, Australia. The flood sediments and fossils line up between the continents suggesting that the deposition occurred first and then broke apart. It also explains how all of the mammoths, lions, bears wolves and other animals were frozen and buried enmass from the continents that moved north and got shoved into the Arctic causing tsunamis and instant climate change. It's the only possible explanation. Jaguars were separated from leopards, honey badgers were separated from the South American greater grison, camels were separated, crocodiles were separated, tapirs were separated, possums and opossums were separated and many other animals. The people never crossed from Africa to South America because they were busy building the Tower of Babel when the earth was divided. The lifespan of humans was cut in half a second time as a result. There was magnetic pole reversals recorded on the ocean floor as the continents spread apart. The mechanism was basic centrifugal force once the out of balance continents broke apart possibly from another asteroid or something. It was a second catastrophic event which caused people to isolate into family groups so that they began speaking their own languages. ...and now you know the rest of the story.
I believe days of Peleg refers to the dispersion after the Tower of Babel ....the Earth's people were divided.
Aztecshad dinosaur sculptures,so did egiptians and more recent the gobekli tepe (unknown creators) "temples"have stone carvings depicting dinosaurs,so TRUE
I was a Christian for the first 45 years of my life and fell away. I wanted desperately to get back to God so I prayed and I read and studied the Bible and how it was written and wanted to believe so incredibly bad but I just can’t get past the facts that I’ve learned such as the fundamental stories are based on older ancient writings and it therefore cannot be solely “God’s Word”. There’s a much earlier creation account in the Enuma Elish, the flood story, there’s a much earlier version in the Epic of Gilgamesh. There are even other people who were said to have done the same things as Jesus, both doing miracles and dying and living again. I promise I’m not trying to be argumentative, I’m just simply trying to find someone who can help me comprehend how it’s possible to believe what seems so obviously just another take on the earlier myths.
If you are truly interested in finding the truth can I suggest you look up the cosmic codes videos on youtube by Chuck Missler. There are 9 of them. The first one to watch would be
Cosmic Codes Sampler: Various Bible Codes
followed by
Cosmic Codes #1
and so on to Cosmic Codes #8
If you don't want to or are not interested then I don't believe you are interested in even looking into any other evidence and are being willingly ignorant of the truth of the Creator and author of the Bible.
He is a God loving man and just because the audience aren’t doctors doesn’t mean they are equivalent in intelligence with produce
Him being God loving doesn´t mean he is right.
@@norbertjendruschj9121 , it doesn't mean that he is wrong either
@@orahouse7479 That´s correct. The evidence is what refutes him.
@@norbertjendruschj9121 what evidence are you referring to? Give me some details
@@orahouse7479 Come on, you find the details in each and every serious geology, paleontology or biology book.
I see no way there can be redemption from the effects of the fall without a historic Adam. The Patriarchs, Prophets, Apostles and Christ taught the Old Testament as history. There can be no second Adam without the first.
Someone once asked me where did he keep the fish 🤭🤭🤭
The oil industry uses secular knowledge based on old earth geology and evolution and it works wonderfully well to find and extract oil… wonder why young earthers don’t have the same success…
6,000 years IS NOT YOUNG!!!!!😮
@@lewiscarey1593 Well, yes it is. The Pyramids alone are nearly 4800 years old.
The leviathan would more likely be a deinosuchus. Especially when describing the double coat of armor, and the back row of shields tightly sealed together.
Job 41:19-23
What about how it could breathe fire?
It's a creature from Babylonian mythology, incorporated into Jewish mythology..... it needn't be more complicated than that.
@@sinjinbritt3371 I think that’s more complicated that an actual creature that can just be described by the writer rather than invented and described by the writer
@truthovertea
then you're saying you worship the Babylonian gods,
since they described it first?
Interesting.
Or can you just admit that making it up, or even plagiarizing, is nothing more, nothing less than writing a description of a fictional fire-breathing water dragon.... that we both know isn't real.
I think one of the main reasons evolutionists fight so hard against the creationists is because their authority and their training is on the line, if they are proven wrong by creationists then their authority is undermined, not to mention all of the training and degrees in the scientific fields they are in. they have a lot riding on this issue, because we are essentially challenging what they have gotten their various degrees in. there is pride involved, they paid a big chunk of change and a good bit of time to get their degrees, if proven wrong then everything they worked for is undone, so they have a lot riding on this issue.
No, it is because as scientists we value truth and scientific reasoning above nearly all else. The promotion of creationism in the face of vast and extensive contrary evidence directly violates some of our dearest virtues.
@@SchnTgaiSpock what virtues? If we are nothing but evolved pond scum you have no reason for virtue, law, or order, but rather the law of the jungle, survival of the fittest, you have no reason for virtue law and order. Oh wait, we do not even exist anyway, we are boltzmann brains, its either that or we are part of a multilevel simulation on some alien computer. Its hard for nature to make whole universes but much easier to make a naked brain, oh and those memories you have, well the matter in the brain had to be arranged someway and what you think you remember or perceive even now are false. That is where the math of the big bang ultimately leads to as a super star cosmologist has said, that it is infinitely unlikely that we are normal brains. A.G.
No, it's simply the fact that society runs on good science. Your car, your phone, nuclear power, all require the methodologies in the sciences to work and be effective. In the end everything is just simple statistical analysis and data crunching, and creationists mainly reject modern technology, even if they do 'use' it'.
@@davidbutler1857
Basically, there are two evolutionary paradigms one is the Big Bang theory and the other is molecules to man evolution, the big bang is so full of problems and band-aids that it is not funny, Carl Sagan famously said we are star stuff, Niel Tyson has said almost the same exact thing, before you can get to molecules to man, you need stars and habitable planets for molecules to man evolution to work, stars are where they elements are made, up to Iron, for all the rest those are made in supernova explosions. the elements of life, so you would think explaining stars is high on their list, they claim today that stars form by supernova explosions close to a gas cloud compressing the cloud until gravity takes over, and at some point fusion starts, or grains of dust enter the cloud cooling it until it compresses and fusion starts, and last collisions, such as two galaxies merging and new stars being born along the collision front, just one major hiccup, in all three you need stars to exist to make the next generation, a supernova is a star exploding, grains of dust, the big bang did not make any, the elements for those are made in stars and galaxy collisions are just huge collections of stars.
Run this thing back to the beginning and you had no first generation to make the second, and I have a bunch of quotes from secular authors detailing that very problem, No Stars, No US. but it gets worse, they have no building blocks for the planets, as when the little rocks merge to become bigger rocks, at about a meter in size they have enough mass to smash each other into rubble, and cannot overcome this until they get to the size of an asteroid. some have claimed that planetesimals formed in a single leap without any intermediate stages, is that science? or just a bunch of hand waving to come up with any old story that will do.
But it gets worse as there is the migration problem, even if the small rocks could get to planetesimal size, as they orbit the protostar i.e. our sun, they are plowing through the gas cloud a headwind, which slows them down, and in about 200 orbits will merge with the protostar, as when an object in orbit slows down it moves close to what it is orbiting and will merge with it.
Not that any of that matters because you do not exist, but when the math of the Big Bang is taken to its limits, it's hard for nature to make an entire universe, and much easier to make fragments, such as a naked brain popping into existence and then popping back out, and this brain had to have the matter arranged somehow, so the memories you think you have are false memories, this is called the Boltzmann brain paradox.
Fair Use
Alan Guth said, (probably the most prominent cosmologist in the country) who agrees this overabundance observed pointed out that,
quote "some calculations result in an infinite number of free-floating brains for every normal brain making it infinitely unlikely for us to be normal brains"
if you cannot even explain the first part of your evolutionary story because it is filled with problem after problem, why should I believe the second part of molecules to man evolution?
There is your science at work! without the Big Bang, there could be no molecules to man evolution, it is infinitely more likely that you are a Boltzmann's brain.
Or how about this one, we are not real, we are a simulation running on a very advanced alien computer, yep your science has gone there too, oh and it gets better there are multiple levels of simulation, where we are a simulation on an alien computer that is a simulation on an alien computer that is a simulation on an alien computer... no wonder these people have alphabet soup after their names, it take shear genius to come up with this stuff. And we are mocked and made fun of for Believing in an infinite supreme being that had the power to create everything,. but hey in the Kardashev scale, if you go past type three civilizations to type five, those people are like gods, we can speculate that some have evolved so far that their abilities are godlike, but yet deny a creator God in our own plain of existence.
@@davidbutler1857
Basically, there are two evolutionary paradigms one is the Big Bang theory and the other is molecules to man evolution, the big bang is so full of problems and band-aids that it is not funny, Carl Sagan famously said we are star stuff, Niel Tyson has said almost the same exact thing, before you can get to molecules to man, you need stars and habitable planets for molecules to man evolution to work, stars are where they elements are made, up to Iron, for all the rest those are made in supernova explosions. the elements of life, so you would think explaining stars is high on their list, they claim today that stars form by supernova explosions close to a gas cloud compressing the cloud until gravity takes over, and at some point fusion starts, or grains of dust enter the cloud cooling it until it compresses and fusion starts, and last collisions, such as two galaxies merging and new stars being born along the collision front, just one major hiccup, in all three you need stars to exist to make the next generation, a supernova is a star exploding, grains of dust, the big bang did not make any, the elements for those are made in stars and galaxy collisions are just huge collections of stars.
Run this thing back to the beginning and you had no first generation to make the second, and I have a bunch of quotes from secular authors detailing that very problem, No Stars, No US. but it gets worse, they have no building blocks for the planets, as when the little rocks merge to become bigger rocks, at about a meter in size they have enough mass to smash each other into rubble, and cannot overcome this until they get to the size of an asteroid. some have claimed that planetesimals formed in a single leap without any intermediate stages, is that science? or just a bunch of hand waving to come up with any old story that will do.
But it gets worse as there is the migration problem, even if the small rocks could get to planetesimal size, as they orbit the protostar i.e. our sun, they are plowing through the gas cloud a headwind, which slows them down, and in about 200 orbits will merge with the protostar, as when an object in orbit slows down it moves close to what it is orbiting and will merge with it.
Not that any of that matters because you do not exist, but when the math of the Big Bang is taken to its limits, it's hard for nature to make an entire universe, and much easier to make fragments, such as a naked brain popping into existence and then popping back out, and this brain had to have the matter arranged somehow, so the memories you think you have are false memories, this is called the Boltzmann brain paradox.
Fair Use
Alan Guth said, "Some calculations result in an infinite number of free-floating brains for every normal brain making it infinitely unlikely for us to be normal brains"
if you cannot even explain the first part of your evolutionary story because it is filled with problem after problem, why should I believe the second part of molecules to man evolution?
There is your science at work! without the Big Bang, there could be no molecules to man evolution, it is infinitely more likely that you are a Boltzmann's brain.
Or how about this one, we are not real, we are a simulation running on a very advanced alien computer, yep your science has gone there too, oh and it gets better there are multiple levels of simulation, where we are a simulation on an alien computer that is a simulation on an alien computer that is a simulation on an alien computer... no wonder these people have alphabet soup after their names, it take shear genius to come up with this stuff. And we are mocked and made fun of for Believing in an infinite supreme being that had the power to create everything,. but hey in the Kardashev scale, if you go past type three civilizations to type five, those people are like gods, we can speculate that some have evolved so far that their abilities are godlike, but yet deny a creator God in our own plain of existence.
Where does God live?
anyone seen the Flintstones movie.😀
Any feedback on the distant starlight theory?
He gives an answer to this in other videos
12:34 “it was an evolutionist that discovered that” as if that means anything. She is also a Christian.
why don't we find dinosaur fossils in the same rock strata as human beings?
Good question .. I used to be a Young Earther, but too much evidence for an old earth
He talks about fossilization rate, but you should check out the genesis apologetics channel for more answers
Look up Dr. Don Patton's talk on the Acámbaro Mexico figurines created several thousand years ago depicting anatomically correct dinosaurs. Watch "Mystery of Acambaro,Dinosaur Figurines, Fact or Fraud,"
I come from a HIndu background and it is very difficult to refute Hinduism here as it is embedded in every aspect of their culture and lifestyle. Moreover the Hindu scriptures are very huge and rich in literature.
Pariwartan, if you are willing to take a suggestion, I encourage you to look into a book called Philosophical Foundation by a man who came from your culture named Surrendra Gangadean. His book critically explores basic worldviews for coherence of meaning. He has some rational objections to the coherence of the Hindu worldview.
@@AlixPrappas Thank you so much, I appreciate. Looking for more such aids.
Hindu's believe in millions of Gods ...over three million...many of which are demonic in nature. Christians believe in one God, that He came in the flesh as Jesus the Christ and that he died and rose from death as an atonement for the sins of mankind. Man by nature is sinful....Man cannot earn his way into heaven and come before a Holy God..Man is not reincarnated into other lower creatures...Man needs a savior and God provided a way for man to dwell with God. The Judaeo Christian bible includes some fifteen hundred prophesies most of which have come about over thousands of years. No other faith can say that about their history. My wife's friend was brought up Hindu and has told us about the many demonic events in here families life. It is sad that so many are deceived by satan...the father of all lies. Please research who Jesus is an know that He Loves you.
When we observe another galaxy, we are literally seeing differing rates of time and differing measures of distance everywhere we look. That means we should expect to see faster speeds of light compared to where we are in the center of the Milky Way galaxy. We should expect that the expanded distance will cause redshift. We should expect for the outer spiral arms to move faster.
AI: That's correct. In general relativity, the local rate of time and the measure of distance depend on the distribution of matter and energy in the universe. When we observe other galaxies, we are effectively looking back in time, and we see them as they were when the light left them. Because the distribution of matter and energy in the universe was different at those times, we observe different rates of time and measures of distance compared to what we observe locally in the Milky Way. This can lead to various observed phenomena such as redshift and the apparent faster motion of the outer spiral arms of galaxies.
You don’t need an expanding universe when the distance between galaxies is expanded from the lack of mass in the vicinity everywhere between galaxies.
AI: That is correct. The expansion of the universe is not required to explain the observed redshift of light from distant galaxies. The expansion of space between galaxies due to the absence of matter, as predicted by general relativity, can explain the observed redshift without the need for an expanding universe.
@@Ihatekommietube Clocks run at different rates of time, different speeds.
❤❤❤
Id imagine a lot of the big dinosaurs went extinct is because they tasted good !! 😋😋☺️☺️😆
9:02 Ah, 'Creation Week'... Day 6 for Dinosaurs. Got it.
You might actually learn something if you watch the whole video. You: 🙈🙉 what you should be:🙊
@@seanvogel8067 I did, hence my comments with time stamps
@@davidbutler1857 Watching with an open mind and listening to consider the facts instead of the with a preconceived idea that you are right about everything in history including the history of teh dinosaurs might be more interesting to you. You listen to the worlds best scientist possibly and discount his words so easily. I wonder what job you do that outclasses Dr Lisle contributions to modern day science in his ither job as a astrophysicist working for Nasa and Space X?
@@paulmerritt2484 Jason Lisle has never worked for Nasa or SpaceX. He quit the field of Astrophysics immediately after graduating with his PhD. He went to work for ICR instead.
8:12 Ah yes, just like with Paul in 1Cor15, here Lisle is basically warning the crowd not to believe anything they hear differently if it's not in the Bible or talked about by it.
😲wow I hope you aren't serious.
@@DJCrisisUK “58 Therefore, my dear brothers and sisters, stand firm. Let nothing move you. Always give yourselves fully to the work of the Lord, because you know that your labor in the Lord is not in vain.”
@@davidbutler1857 He is giving word for word account of the bible. No reason to disagree with his teaching here if this is what you mean.
@@paulmerritt2484 It means that Paul is telling his flock not to listen to anyone else. This is a classic propaganda tactic.
I’m now gonna drop a “Isn’t that interesting?” In every apologetics conversation now 😅
Why would Noah put fully grown adults on the Ark?
It is easier to believe in magic and folklore than it is to understand science.
Yes. True. So sad to be mentally challenged.
Your parents are monkeys. 🤣
So you believe that the 'magic' of our fine tuned universe and planet without a magician.
No, it is much harder to be a creationist in a world that does not allow any deviation from received secular dogma.
@@pamwren6866
You are welcome to believe in whatever magic you want to, but do not expect intelligent, educated people to agree with you. I know you think that is persecution. It is not.
We should also see Dinosaurs appear in different levels in the sedimentary layers - pre flood vs post flood dinosaurs .. also sin brought death to man not to animals, this is clear in Romans 6:12 be sure to read the full passage .. "... and in this way death came to all people" - no mention to all created animals
Vinigaroons in west Texas are amazing! I have seen them!
Chemical defences!
I did not see a calculation of how much food and water was needed to feed all of the animals .. that would also take up space
I have a very simple explanation for this if anyone would like to know
Who was it that discovered the blood cells in the dinosaur femur?
Many people have now
They weren't blood cells. They were perminerlized remains OF possible blood cells. Rock.
Dr Schweizer. She says all the time that theists misrepresent her work, and it in fact does nothing to support biblical claims.
@lovindausa guess your reading comprehension isn't up to par... or you simply NEVER bothered to read her research.
Either way, you're an embarrassment.
@lovindausa how about you actually do the work and research what she says about it and how her work is misrepresented by apologists?
Or do you just believe everything that feeds your confirmation bias and ignore the rest? Just look for her interviews, it isn't hard to find if you actually want the facts and not the apologetic BS.
A Behometh is a Sauropod dinosaur and a Leviathan is a Deinosuchus - twice the size of the largest crocodile and similar in looks. Even the trail left in the mud by the jagged potsherds. This was the “king over all” and nothing on earth is it’s equal!!!
@40:10 46.8% is a huge problem when talking about living space. Think about that for more than two seconds.
I'm so upset to discover that mankind killed of all the dragons, and animals committed sins so God wiped them out. Yeah, makes sense to me.
I call your attention to the American bison. From millions down to just a few animals. Humans probably did eradicate an animal that they had reason to fear. Tigers are becoming rare. Animal genome may have been corrupted. I guess you have seen the rat with a human ear growing on its back. Pigs that have human blood. God did not create evil. He created humans with free will. Cycles of life and death are not evil. Malicious deeds are.
Desperate stuff.
Nice laptop.
Think because they watched the flintstones they think man coexisted with dinosaurs
Young earth creationism is the only model that fits with reality.
And the Bible
😂😂😂
Who’s reality?
well, bless your heart
@@davidgardner863 Yours and mine
Dr. Dino
This is a secondary doctrinal issue that does not prevent faith in Christ and salvation through him. You can believe true things and trust observable reality and be a christian. This guy does not represent my world view or the bulk of Christendom through time.
12:44 Mary Schweitzer is also a Christian, and she has repeatedly rebuked people like Lisle for misstating her findings.
No she hasn't. She has mostly avoided giving interviews and has "cautioned" against people jumping to conclusions. She received a $5 million grant to disprove that the soft tissue was fresh and she's still trying. She's an evolutionist through and through. She has found multiple fossils with fresh tissue and C-14, ruled out all contamination, but will not admit or accept that they're not millions of years old. She would rather exhaust all possible theories than to even entertain the idea the Bible was accurate. Odd choice for a professed Christian.
@@jrice07 lol Not true. She's given several interviews, even done some shows as a guest, written articles and so on.
ALL fossils have some amounts of C14 in them because they are still porous enough to contain microorganisms that have intruded into them, especially from surface water (rain). She has NEVER found any fossils with 'fresh' tissues of any kind, and ALL of them are simply mineralized remnants of soft tissues where acid treatments are necessary to reduce the mineral intrusion to then examine those remnants.
She's definitely chastised YECS for using her research that Cleary shows recent dinosaurs. Her explanation has fallen flat, sorry the iron cross linking nonsense that's been debunked. Thankfully more researchers are pulling this stuff out and if you were being honest you'd quote all the denials from evolutionists now shown to be wrong. It is original material and can't last more than 1 million years. 😢😢😢
@@davidbutler1857The tissue shouldn't be there. Period. The fact it was processed with chemicals - THE MATERIAL WAS NOT FOSSILIZED AND WOULD NOT LAST 65 MILLION YEARS TO BE PROCESSED. Anyone can verify why this discovery makes frauds like you squirm. They found dinosaur Collagen. It wouldn't be there to be processed because the atoms would have been smashed apart by radiation lol plus,, rain and microbes would destroy or eat it. Anyone like you that pretends the SOFT TISSUE is not big deal is obviously ignorant of the evolutionary response and shock at it even being found. lIar.. They didn't even look for stuff the stuff because it shouldn't be there. More hand waving
What if all the dinosaurs were baby T Rex's...for example...
Every animal, plant, dinosaur, and person would fit. All they needed to carry was the DNA.
So how did all the plants of the world get to the ark?
Loch Ness monster ??
Native Americans describe thunderbirds (pterasaurs) having luminescence from their bellies. Firey? It could also mean temperament, as well as the ability to expel something that feels like burning like fire ants
American natives depicted them as birds with feathers. Pterosaurs didn’t have feathers and look nothing like birds.
@@davidgardner863 they decorate everything with feathers. Look at ancient thunderbird depictions not modern ones that have replaced it with their depiction of eagles. There's a marked difference.
14:43 Humans never lived with dinosaurs. Unless you count Birds.
Oh you were there? I know Africans that are adamant there are dinosaurs living in the Congo. They say "Oh yes it's well known in my country. We see them in the rivers. Even the crocodiles fear them." And every couple of years we discover living animals secular scientists claim died out millions of years ago.
@@jrice07 Dude, cameras have existed for over 150 years. Pretty sure we'd have some pictures of large or even smaller dinosaurs by now if any actually existed.
15:25 Dear god I hope these people don't vote at all.
And they reproduce too.
Where did you graduate? Dude would run circles around you in a debate
@@dronefooty7311From a college just like Lisle did. I even majored originally in Astronomy and physics.
They definitely didn’t teach what he’s spewing
What a disingenuous statement. I'm sure Jason Lisle himself would tell you that he valued very much what he was taught there, even if he didn't agree with some things. @@Ihatekommietube
One question. Why did cavemen draw pictures of horses and antelope rather than Tyrannosaurus Rex and Triceratops? I am a committed Christian, but your talk is nonsense.
How do u know everything cavemen drew pictures of? Or are u just speculating?
Also,I think u need to watch the entire video. U will see that ur comment was very ignorant and dumb.
@@justinmoock7506No, he is not speculating:
“Along with cave bears (which were far larger than grizzly bears), the lions, mammoths, and rhinos account for 63 percent of the identified animals, a huge percentage compared to later periods of cave art. Horses, bison, ibex, reindeer, red deer, aurochs, Megaceros deer, musk-oxen, panther, and owl are also represented.”
Where did this “Dr” got his PhD in biology from?
Believe it or not, he went to Univ of Colorado in Boulder for his PhD.. got his undergrad at Ohio Wesleyian univ.
Lisle does this for the money. It's an easier/better paying bit than actually getting a job in Astronomy.
He makes about $60k a year and lives alone in an apartment in Dallas, TX. @@Ihatekommietube
you're soo cute
What a sad little creature this guy is. Dinosaurs and men living together ... :)
What's sad obviously sad is your spiritual state.
@@shaun7156 You conflate spiritual state with magical and delusional thinking.
@@lizadowning4389 why could dinosaurs and humans not have lived at the same time? Seriously. Think about the issues with that (and I'm not denying that there could be), think about the possibilities that could resolve those issues, and see if you can come up with one indisputable reason why we couldn't have back then. And keep in mind:
- According to science our DNA loses information over generations, meaning there were really smart people back then.
- We don't know what the atmospheric conditions were post and pre flood.
- Some elements of their preferred habits could have been embellished by movies like Jurassic Park.
One of two species of Sloth migrated 10,000 miles from Mt Ararat to Central America after the flood without any tree canopies or food and took up camp right near regions where you find the fossil ancestors of modern Sloths. And then the other Sloth species branch started evolving the moment they arrived. Here's the problem: Sloths don't migrate, they stay in the only American tree canopy environment that will sustain their survival and the region around them bears their evolutionary fossil record. Science is really not that hard.
4:40 The age of the Earth was already suspected to be quite old before Paleontology was even a formal field of study. In fact it was the study OF fossils and geology as a whole that increasingly led people to understand that the Earth must be very old because none of these extinct organisms were still around and were also buried deeply under layered sequential strata. Not the result of a global flood, etc.
Why, then, are there fossils of sea life at the tops of many of the highest mountains?
@@mmarciniak, Plate tectonics, uplifting.
How is there C14 in the fossils if they more more than a few thousand years old? Do you know the half life of c14? Do you understand it can not be older than 6000 years? Do you know that no scientist can refute this? Can you refute this? Can you find us anyone who can? I would love to consider any facts to say Dr Lisle is not correct but you offer us nothing solid based on scientific evidence. You are sharing your opinion with out telling how you even came to such conclusions. I am a fair man with an open mind so here is your chance to change my mind. Will you seek out and research the evidence for yourself and come back with something compelling to tell me to make me believe you?
@@paulmerritt2484 Radiometric dating and the half lives of elements are a well known fact and if done properly are accurate within given parameters. I know more about astronomy and Lisle has been knowingly deceptive when he talks about comets as evidence for a young universe. Although he is correct in saying comets lose some mass every time they near the sun on their elliptical orbits and therefore cannot be more than 10,000 years old, he doesn’t mention that new comets coming in from deep space are observed entering the inner solar system every year. Some have their long elliptical orbits altered by Jupiter’s gravity into short terms of 200 years or less. This is something every amateur astronomer knows and as an astrophysicist Lisle knows it too. So if he is being deceptive there, how can we trust anything else he says?
.
@@paulmerritt2484 Most fossils that people find are surface-eroded, meaning that they are basically exposed or nearly exposed in the surface soil/rock. This is due to the weathering of the formations over many millions of years. To even become sedimentary rock, this requires depth/pressure of hundreds of feet of layered sediments. Anyway, the surface-eroded rock is still very porous, and hence, water gets into it over time, and as the rock that the fossil is in nears the surface (from weathering), then bacteria/microorganisms end up inside the rock pores. This is very well known. These bacteria/microrganisms are the source of the C14.
I wonder why God made Noah build the ark and gather the animals when he could have done it himself. He could have even just spared their lives from the flood. I believe the Bible 100%. But some of it makes you scratch your head
Your absolutely correct!! Many BIBLE STORIES are stories with a MORAL and ETHICAL LESSON and they are not necessarily ACTUAL HISTORICAL EVENTS!! Most people that are WISE understand that, but people like Dr. LISLE that are highly educated like to speak eloquently and SELL YOU BOOKS and VIDEOS!! I always say if the OBJECTIVE of a speaker has ANYTHING TO DO WITH MONEY, BUYER and LISTENER BEWARE!!
EVERYONE UNDERSTANDS the Earth is ancient just look around for a few seconds and you figure that out!!
I always point to the Hawaiian islands!! They are nearly 100 million years of birth, erosion, and slowly dieing by wind and rain erosion back to a pile of rocks on the Ocean floor. There is a CONTINUUM of these islands.
I wish these AUSTRALIAN SHISTERS that sell books and videos series called ANSWERS IN GENESIS would push JESUS life, lessons, and Salvation with his Death on the Cross for our SINS was the focus INSTEAD of PUSHING a FANTASY that the EARTH is a REDICULOUS 6000 years old!!
I have a name for AIG, I call them NO AMSWERS IN GENESIS!!
I am not discounting GENESIS, it was written in Ancient HEBREW and only in a certain ENGLISH TRANSLATIONAL ERROR do you get a 6000 year old Earth!!
Flesh had to be carried out until Jesus Messiah was born. Nothing came easy in this world after the fall.
Did you ever hear Bill Cosby’s sketch on Noah? Its insightful. Disregard it’s Cosby. One of the lines when Noah has 2 female hippos instead of a pair has him asking God to change one of them. “C’mon Noah” says God. “You know I don’t work like that.”
Noah preached judgement all while building the ark. It was an object lesson to the violent people around him to repent. It had purpose and symbolic value. God chose it for a reason, not for lack of alternatives.
oh, and if you don't ask a carpenter for law advice, then you shouldn't ask an intellectually dishonest astrophysicist about dinosaurs.
why don't you make a direct accusation....or just insult.... you are a horrible person.... get saved.
So, someone who interprets information differently from your school of thought is automatically intellectually dishonest?
@pamwren6866
If they're speaking out of their field of expertise and have an agenda that has nothing to do with the specific topic.....
probably yes
Behemoth and Liviathan
Were dinodaurs.
The dinosaurs were called
Dragons
Did God fight a dinosaur? 'In that day the LORD with his sore and great and strong sword shall punish leviathan the piercing serpent, even leviathan that crooked serpent; and he shall slay the dragon that is in the sea.'
@@FilipCordas Different context and revelations is not written literally. It is imagery that is metaphoric. Real all of revelations and you will see what I mean. Your logic takes presupposition of the contents, context, and facts. You cherry pick scripture without the full context to make it as you wish not as it is.
@@paulmerritt2484 First of that's Isaiah 27:1 not revaluation and it's 'metaphoric' just like in the book of Job. And if you read it in context like Psalm 74:14 this is talking about the chaoskampf. It's strange to me when you non-Christian heretics start promoting your magic Book nonsense, and actual say that God fought a plesiosaur and that Flintstones where a documentary. Here is another quote for you 'Then I will tell them plainly, ‘I never knew you; depart from Me, you workers of lawlessness!’
The problem is… the Bible doesn’t fit into what is KNOWN about prehistoric dinosaurs. The dating of rock strata and ancient bones provides pretty solid evidence the age of the dinosaurs ended long before the emergence of modern humanoids by millions of years.
So the question here is, how one is defining dinosaur. One could say that modern birds are dinosaurs because the consensus is they’re the longest surviving species from that era. But they are NOT the same dinosaurs as their predecessors.
These kind of speeches or sermons are reliant upon the scale of ignorance of both speakers and audience.
Behemoth and Leviathan were both mythological creatures in earlier mythologies. Not history. unless you also believe in Babylonian and Sumerian gods. Sad to watch a grown man try and rationalize mythology.
Looking at the internet, the origins of the words "behemoth" and "leviathan" are supported that they are Hebrew words. Where did you get your info from?
@jarrodmaston2621
Well, Mr "I don't tag the writer of the OP in my response", according to the internet, the Earth is flat and aliens run our government with the illuminati.
Seriously though, your Google search skills are woefully inadequate.
Not all words or characters in mythology were spelled the same across multiple civilizations, mythologies and languages....
research Lotan and you'll see.
Next time put in more effort than a single search.
@@jarrodmaston2621 how about you go a step further and find the origin of the Hebrew words/names/myths? Don't be silly and think all Hebrew words, legends, stories, and mythologies are unique or devoid of outside cultural influence. If you were to research the mythologies of other cultures, and not just the Jewish mythology, then you'll start to see how modern Jewish and Christian religious beliefs evolved from various mythologies and legends. Once you stop assuming religious texts are history, you'll start to realize they aren't, at best they're euhemeristic fiction.
@@sinjinbritt3371 Thank you for skating around my question...... Where did your information from? Don't be silly and think that you have the truth source while not even siting it.....
@jarrodmaston2621 I'm betting you didn't even bother going so far as to perform a simple Google search into Mesopotamian mythology before sending that response. I'm betting you still haven't bothered looking it up. The a- typical flaw in the theistic mindset has always been in believing any religious absurd claim, even if it's totally unsupported by credible evidence, so long as it feeds their confirmation bias... but as soon as someone challenges their assumptions, what they were conditioned to believe or what they are expected to repeat as part of their respective dogma, all of a sudden they demand to be spoon fed the information or evidence, as if that would change their mind. No, I'm not going to bother spoon feeding you or do your research for you.... you can look into it and see if what I said is in fact the case, or you can bemoan the fact I didn't give you references and just assume I'm lying because that would be easier for you to do, and then you could maintain plausible deniability to the facts at hand. It's hard to fathom how people in this "age of information" can be so oblivious to the compendium of knowledge available to them. I find it amazing that "The Bible says so" is a reasonable explanation for theists. Have you ever researched any Hebrew/Jewish religious story/claim from a non-apologetic source? I'm betting you haven't. I'm betting you didn't even know the ancient Hebrews were, ironically, polytheistic at one time. Have you ever fact checked religious claims from non-religious sources? Are the claims that dinosaurs lived with humans more reliable than the evidence that doesn't support those claims? The unwavering dedication to ignorance that's required to adhere to claims like dinosaurs and humans lived together is absolutely mind-boggling. I could give you multiple references, but would you accept the facts within them, or would you spend all your time and effort looking for apologetics that claimed otherwise?... be honest. The claim that dinosaurs lived with modern humans is sheer stupidity, yet here we are on different sides of the fence. Have you bothered to read the evidence and research that utterly disproves every single Young Earth claim... or do you spend your time looking for apologetics that support those claims? I'm wondering, do you accept Evolution, or are you the type to parrot "where's the evidence?" when it's freely accessible to everyone with a library card or an internet connection? Bottom line, you either want the facts and will go out of your way to find them and learn/understand them... or you just want to believe the claims, no matter how absurd they are, because it's easier. And it's "citing", not "siting". Have a nice day.
A grown man in the 21st century believes in Noah’s Ark?!! How much ignorance and lies does that require?
LOL, and then at 12:20 Lisle admits this, but he positions it as if all that mineralization just happens instantly... Hey Jason, what sort of rock was that fossil encased in again? Oh that's right, Sedimentary rock! Guess how that forms? Oh that's right, pressure/depth and time...
Actually some sedimentary rock forms in seconds, so no, deep time isn't necessary for rock formation.
@@jrice07 There are some types of sediment that solidify quickly (volcanic flows) but otherwise no. This is wrong, and just an attempt to avoid the point.
@@davidbutler1857 flee devil. This is the 2nd video I've seen you under causing confusion.
@@diamondlucas5973 Correct me if I’m wrong otherwise buzz off back to the abyss with you
@@jrice07 No sedimentary rock forms in seconds. Sediment can form a dry crust in hours perhaps, but to become stone takes millions of years. Sorry for your delusion.
Are you for real
He is. Have you heard of the craft that touched the sun in teh news recently. He for real is the astrophysicist who designed it and piloted it remotely. Dr. Lisle is at the top of the field of observable science and astrophysics. He is also a biologist of the highest standard. This man not only graduated a the top of his classes but he set a new standard for the universities he has graduated from. He is a world renounce scientist who is respected by even his unbelieving peers. Many of his peers are also believers as science does prove the Bible to be correct. Most of teh worlds greatest scientists have been believers in God actually all through history. The question is do you trust the science?
@@paulmerritt2484 Kevin Rider - That was Rob Webb from Answers In Genesis - he was involved in designing the following from this clip from an article on their website : "My main responsibilities involved designing and implementing the primary inertial navigation system (INS) for the third-stage motor’s flight computer (avionics system). In simple terms, this means I helped give the rocket its “driving route” to the sun."
@@paulmerritt2484, This goes to show that even a highly educated person can be totally irrational.
This is just a general comment, I am not suggesting or even thinking that Dr. Lisle is a false teacher.
One of the largest bible studies I have undertaken is false prophets/teachers - doctrine/teaching it is huge, it begins in genesis 3 and continues through Revelation.
By being such a huge study, this tells me that doctrine is important, but why? because false doctrines and false teachings are lies, it is just that simple.
Lies
Pro 6:16 These six things doth the LORD hate: yea, seven are an abomination unto him:
Pro 6:17 A proud look, *_a lying tongue,_* and hands that shed innocent blood,
Pro 6:18 An heart that deviseth wicked imaginations, feet that be swift in running to mischief,
Pro 6:19 *_A false witness that speaketh lies,_* and he that soweth discord among brethren.
God hates lying so much that on this very short list of 7 abominations, lying is on that list twice!
Pro 12:22 Lying lips are abomination to the LORD: but they that deal truly are his delight
Joh 8:44 Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.
Rev 21:8 But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death.
Those who hold to and or tech false doctrine are teaching lies, it is just that simple.
Act 17:11 These were more noble than those in Thessalonica, in that they received the word with all readiness of mind, and searched the scriptures daily, whether those things were so.
1Th 5:21 Prove all things; hold fast that which is good.
2Ti 2:15 Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth.
Do we really seek for the truth of God's word or do we just accept what we are taught and hope for the best?
Truth
Act 5:32 And we are his witnesses of these things; and so is also the Holy Ghost, whom God hath given to them that obey him.
Joh 14:26 But the Comforter, which is the Holy Ghost, whom the Father will send in my name, he shall teach you all things, and bring all things to your remembrance, whatsoever I have said unto you.
Joh 16:13 Howbeit when he, the Spirit of truth, is come, he will guide you into all truth: for he shall not speak of himself; but whatsoever he shall hear, that shall he speak: and he will shew you things to come.
1Co 2:10 But God hath revealed them unto us by his Spirit: for the Spirit searcheth all things, yea, the deep things of God.
1Co 2:11 For what man knoweth the things of a man, save the spirit of man which is in him? even so the things of God knoweth no man, but the Spirit of God.
1Co 2:12 Now we have received, not the spirit of the world, but the spirit which is of God; that we might know the things that are freely given to us of God.
1Co 2:13 Which things also we speak, not in the words which man's wisdom teacheth, but which the Holy Ghost teacheth; comparing spiritual things with spiritual.
1Co 2:14 But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned.
1Co 12:7 But the manifestation of the Spirit is given to every man to profit withal.
1Jn 2:27 But the anointing which ye have received of him abideth in you, and ye need not that any man teach you: but as the same anointing teacheth you of all things, and is truth, and is no lie, and even as it hath taught you, ye shall abide in him.
Because we have the availability of the Holy Ghost to bring the scriptures we have hid in our hearts to our remembrance and to guide us into all truth, there is no excuses for being deceived by false teachers and their false doctrines.
I'm a Christian. Formerly a young earth creationist. I have read all the yec literature. I'm very well acquainted.
There are no dinosaurs in the Bible. Leviathan is a multi-headed fire breathing Hydra: it's a mythological creature. It's a presumed subterranean chaos dragon of the deep sea, presumably under the earth/surrounding the land of the earth that twists and turns causing earthquakes and tsunamis. Did the biblical authors actually think it was a real animal? Maybe. Maybe not. It doesn't matter, because it wasn't a prescription to believe it really existed: it functioned as a teaching device.
Behemoth, bahamut, was a supernatural bull creature who extends his...male member ("tail" is a euphemism, and an obvious one), to show his power and virility.
The point of mentioning them is to find the biggest thing in Job's, and the reader's, mind that YHWH can easily overpower that no mere human possibly could withstand.
It was NOT a taxonomy lesson.
Beyond that, the Bible absolutely gives NO indication of the age of the earth, or when Adam lived. The attempt to date that based on genealogy is extremely flawed for many reasons. For one, the genealogies aren't often complete. For another, they are probably using honorific transposition rather than literal calendar ages for individuals. It was common in ancient Israel to do so, and there are many examples in the Bible itself.
Lastly, before God even said that there should be light, the earth is already in the picture being waste and wilderness and water surrounded it from all sides, cosmologically speaking. Notice there is never a "let there be a world/space". That's because the entire point of Genesis 1 isn't about the creation of the universe or earth materially at all. It's assumed to already be here. It's a standard 6 day creation with 7th day occupancy for God to sit on His throne and begin ruling just like all temples that were built back then. The earth is God's temple originally, and the Garden was on His mountain where He was to meet his first priest, Adam at the intersection of Heaven and Earth.
Around 7 minutes… 7 pairs of each kid of clean animal and 1 pair of unclean. People always say 2 of ever kind and draw cartoons of it. Teaching it wrong
T Rex ate water melons? Is he auditioning for Saturday Night Live?
he started off the bat with nonsense...... and just jumped head first into the rabbit hole of nonsense.
He misrepresented pretty much everything he said....sadly, theists just eat this gibberish up and never do the honest research themselves.
Ibteresting that the poor fellow imagines that he might be able to be chrsistian and does not understand that being a mindless bigot and being a chrstian are mutually exclusive, which may account for why there *are_no* christians
3:40 He forgets that BIRDS have the same leg structure as Theropod Dinosaurs. Naturally because they ARE dinosaurs, lol.
No
@@allstargaming5270 yes
Oh brother site your research please.
Well bats have the same arm structures as humans but no one is claiming bats are humans simply because we have a similiar skeletal characteristic. There are zero transitional fossils that would show that birds were reptiles. Fossilized bird feathers have been found that "pre-date" dinosaurs which would debunk the hypothesis totally, but evolutionists deny facts as long as possible amd suggest what are clearly fossilized feathers simply cannot be feathers because "we know" dinosaurs turned into birds. That's not science, that's anti-science.
Are you serious? You really don't know birds came from dinosaurs?
5:00 I'd like to point out that all this time, Lisle's slides always have a meme-like format, reminiscent of a Chick tract, all with disdainful cartoonish renderings and strawmen of the other side of this issue.
Why are you so determined not to trust the science?
@@paulmerritt2484 When he bothers to present some, I'd be happy to review it. Otherwise Lisle is just a comic book character using comic books to make his arguments.
I'm Sorry.....are you drawing conclusions that dinosaur means to you serpent, dragon, Leviathan, Behemoth or sea monster?
Because these common nouns refer to specifically: a snake, a mythical creature, a whale, a hippopotamus(Russian>begemot) and whale again.
There is no reference specifically to "dinosaur", either by name nor existence nor extinction.
There is also no possibility that tribal elders referred to dinosaurs handed down though memory because...sadly...the dinosaur was until late Cretaceous and man is early Mioceneious.
So...we actually can dismiss it as fairytale...
What anybody can do....is inject anything that they want....
It's just that I'm not requiring inoculation...thanks very much.
Oh goody, another Lisle video that actually has open comments.
Stand by people, this is gonna be fun. Comments to ensue....
We must stop referring to the bible as "stories".
You’re right. They are not stories. They are myths.
@@tonygarrett7214 God's Word...The Bible, has done more to give us understanding of life and answer our most profound questions. Not bad for a bunch of myths.
@@gibsonguy5240
I think you’ll find that all the branches of science and medicine have done more for humanity. If you ever need or have had an operation, be grateful that the surgeon gained his knowledge to heal you from learning surgical techniques and acquiring knowledge via text books and not the word of God via the Bible.
@@tonygarrett7214 I pay tremendous respect to and recognition for the medical advances. I take nothing from them. They are AMAZING!
@@tonygarrett7214 Myths that are scientifically and historically accurate? Odd.
Mary Schweitzer was the one who found the soft tissue and did the analysis on it. Maybe we should listen to what she found instead of stealing her work and making our own conclusions about it. She's a believer and not a YEC
Why does he talk so much about the Bible? He's an astronomer, not a theologian.
13:51 Lisle dishonestly using a phylogenetic tree (to small to know which one he is employing, there are millions created for various analyses) and I would guess this particular one is looking at possible ghost lineages (conjectured early branchings of Dinosaur groups based on some fossil findings) but the issue he's failing to cover is that some of these groupings involve many fossil discoveries of many species within each branch, and not just one animal, and the branchings themselves would be above the genus level.
What happens to children who have been born in the wrong religion
If they die before the age of accountability, then instant heaven. If they grow up and accept the gospel, then instant heaven. But even children and grown ups that were born "christian" and stayed "christian" their entire life will also go to hell. It's not about being born in the right or wrong religion, it's about accepting or rejecting the gospel.
@@Temas_TAD My word wise words 5,000 religions worshiped worldwide, aren’t you fortunate to be born into the only true one. Unbelievable arrogance and ignorance
@@Temas_TAD So all other religions know about these fictional gospels
@@Temas_TAD They are brainwashed about there own religious teaching . Try Buddhism not a crackpot religion , a beautiful philosophy
@@Temas_TAD Bit harsh that statement so anyone born Christian and stays Christian will go to hell, my word what about your loving god and gentle Jesus. Think l will stay with Buddhism thank you very much
Is this man for real , he never puts himself up for a debate, which should tell you something , the utter rubbish he comes out with is all for his deluded followers , which is ok but please not children let them hear both sides and let them make up their own minds. He is clearly deluded or even worse. It’s much better to have unanswered questions , than have answers that cannot be questioned
Amazing the times on Mr Lisle sites where h e only preaches to his deluded flock . Any comments other than agreeing with him they are deleted. I Only asked does he believe the earth is no older than 6,000 years old , and man coexisted with dinosaurs
Dr Lisle? What University? Dr of what? Ridiculous thinking. Creationist scientific colleagues? So tiresome. Faith is faith. Science is science. This is not a scientist!
Lol. Christians are adorable
?
They are aren’t they!!! They’ll come a day that you’ll wish you was one!!!
Yes- adorable and knowledgeable
@@arianam4208 facts
@@pedrohippocaus8488 facts
4:59 Oh he 'disagrees' with their interpretation of a fossil. Wonderful.
Where did Lisle get his Geology or Biology degrees from?
Where did you?
@@Cinnamonbuns13 I don’t need to have a degree in Geology to criticize Lisle who doesn’t have one
@@davidbutler1857 But you're critiquing his lack of degree....
Yes, to be able to 'disagree' with experts. I am not claiming to disagree with them, so I don't need to own a degree in that field to agree with them. They are the experts. @@Cinnamonbuns13
History & science are full of lies, it's really hard to know what is true. I find Satan around all corners, thats why I know our creator is in the next life😊
5:30 I just love it that Lisle knows that everyone in this audience is about as well educated as a potato, and he keeps nodding at various people with this whole "Oh I'm gonna make a lot of money off these people" look on his face.
Don’t project the sickness in your heart onto other people
@@seanvogel8067 The only sickness is Jason Lisle
Sure. Just look at how financially wealthy he looks and acts. You’re wrong, David Butler.
@@mmarciniak There are lots of con men who aren’t rich but make enough to make a living
@seanvogel8067 reality trumps your fairy tale, just because you don't like it doesn't change the fact you and the other delusional people are wrong.
I’m surprised that the comments section is on here. Lisle cannot take criticism of his ideas. Turning off the comments section in his more irrational and bizarre videos stifles discussion and leaves his audience having to endure his nonsense without the opportunity to challenge his ideas. I don’t know who is responsible for censoring the comments section but it only serves Lisle’s interests and not the commentators. Perhaps he’s afraid of having his ideas challenged. Bad science Dr Lisle.
This is why you never see Lisle do debates.
This is not his channel and many others use his material but are not owned by Dr Lisle so he has no control over comments or replies
If you want to reject what he says he has his own website where people can write and debate the topics
Good luck 😎
You have to sign up and all comments are moderated.@@letscatchthemall6862
Why do we think dinosaurs were reptiles They have structures like mammals A T Rex don't look much different than a kangaroo And triceratop is much like a hippo or a rhino I had my doubts if there reptiles at all
One simple answer is teeth. Totally different in mammals and dinosaurs. Another is ear bones.
Maybe you should just read a book about paleontology. Then you can post an educated opinion.
@Norbert Jendruschj What the education that says there's no God And dinosaurs are millions of years old that education! Sorry I don't buy into that nonsense
@@phillipgray7371 For one, only the creationists think, you must believe in the coexistence of god and dinos to be a Christian.
Secondly, the opinion of lay -people like us doesn´t matter in the scientific discourse.
The skin has scales. We have lots of samples of dinosaur skin.
@Paul Merritt If we have skin samples that's even more proof that the dinosaurs aint millions of years old