Have you considered trying to mount a gimble camera under as well for reconnaissance while flying an autonomous mission? Would be cool and could actually help people.
cool to see auto missions, Arduplane with mission planner can do very sophisticated ones, and easy to use once set up. I sometimes am curious about Inav, but Arduplane does everything I need, so never taken the time to try it.
@@FPVREVIEWS Comparing the two: Ardu has all kinds of little-used options for weird things, and good support for redundancy. Redundant sensors, redundant receivers, etc. Ardu is a good fit if your company or university has a team of four or more people setting all this up on a $100,000 aircraft. INAV is about 10X easier to set up and fly. INAV is well suited when there are one or two people setting up and flying an aircraft that costs maybe $100-$4,000, and probably has one receiver, one GPS, etc.
@@senseisecurityschool9337 Hmm. I would disagree. I have been using Arduplane for the hobby by myself since 2015 and find it relatively quick to set up. I have made my own notes, and follow them, to ensure continuity, and I usually set it up on the very first flight. It has saved a couple of my aircraft from other failures on the maiden flight, so I actually see it as a safety advantage. I think the real problem is that most people assume it is more complex than it actually is to setup. of course all of those advanced features are available if you choose to use them, but they do not get in the way of an amateur builder. I write like it myself, but it was intimidating not knowing before I tried it.
Greetings, great video. I have a mission scheduled behind the mountains, I will surely lose TX signal, I will use the parameter failsafe_mission_delay = -1 so that the mission continues using the GPS. But what happens if I also lose the GPS? What function would this parameter do in the mission failsafe_gps_fix_estimation_delay = -1 ?. Would it be better to activate the failsafe_gps_fix_estimation_delay = 7 ? Would this activate the FS even if I have the ailsafe_mission_delay = -1 ?
By "fins", do you mean ailerons? Elevons? Rudders? Elevators? Landing flaps? In general, if you have two flight control surfaces that do the same thing, simply connect the two servos to the same output. Two rudders would both be connected to the rudder output. Where you want the surfaces to move opposite one another such as for ailerons, mount the servos mirror-image, the tops of both servos pointed toward the center of the plane, or both pointed outward. By mounting the servos as mirror-image, the movement will be equal and opposite. With INAV, the transmitter only needs to send throttle, pitch, roll, and yaw. Plus Arm. It's then up to *INAV* to control motors, ailerons, rudders, elevators, etc.
yes, you only need 5 to control the aircraft, 4 for the main flight controls, 1 for arming, if you do not have physical arming switch, or arm remotely using a telemetry radio. then the last for a mode switch, but not absolutely neccesary if you already have the aircraft set up and do not need to switch modes. but most radios have 6 channels, so you are good to go.
New upload, fuck yeah man. Found your channel recently, love your stuff. Def the best of Autonomous UAV channels atm imo!
Have you considered trying to mount a gimble camera under as well for reconnaissance while flying an autonomous mission? Would be cool and could actually help people.
Waypoint missions are the always the best!
What a beautiful launch.
cool to see auto missions, Arduplane with mission planner can do very sophisticated ones, and easy to use once set up. I sometimes am curious about Inav, but Arduplane does everything I need, so never taken the time to try it.
@@FPVREVIEWS
Comparing the two:
Ardu has all kinds of little-used options for weird things, and good support for redundancy. Redundant sensors, redundant receivers, etc. Ardu is a good fit if your company or university has a team of four or more people setting all this up on a $100,000 aircraft.
INAV is about 10X easier to set up and fly. INAV is well suited when there are one or two people setting up and flying an aircraft that costs maybe $100-$4,000, and probably has one receiver, one GPS, etc.
@@senseisecurityschool9337 Hmm. I would disagree. I have been using Arduplane for the hobby by myself since 2015 and find it relatively quick to set up. I have made my own notes, and follow them, to ensure continuity, and I usually set it up on the very first flight. It has saved a couple of my aircraft from other failures on the maiden flight, so I actually see it as a safety advantage. I think the real problem is that most people assume it is more complex than it actually is to setup. of course all of those advanced features are available if you choose to use them, but they do not get in the way of an amateur builder. I write like it myself, but it was intimidating not knowing before I tried it.
Greetings, great video. I have a mission scheduled behind the mountains, I will surely lose TX signal, I will use the parameter failsafe_mission_delay = -1 so that the mission continues using the GPS. But what happens if I also lose the GPS? What function would this parameter do in the mission failsafe_gps_fix_estimation_delay = -1 ?. Would it be better to activate the failsafe_gps_fix_estimation_delay = 7 ? Would this activate the FS even if I have the ailsafe_mission_delay = -1 ?
Спасибо большое за выпуск.
Why wont you invest in a digital fpv system?
can you make a video about the program or code/sofware that control the autonomous of the vehicle ? that would be great
thankyou
Nice!
Nice bro
Nice can it carry a Molotov fire bomb?
Nive video.. Why is the sun black?? Nasa's sun simulator maybe??
Is it possible to explain the wing spar overall because I didn’t understand it?
Wing span is 1700mm
@@Dr-RC-Plane123I mean the wing spar which connects the wings to fuselage because I have the question how the wings don’t come off during the flight
At the which mode did you flight?
Why was the first upload deleted?
No audio
Is the slow speed for optimal performance?
Optimal efficiency - It's meant to fly missions at 4.5-5.5A cruise throttle, which gives best results in flight time & trip distance.
Did you have to do any paper work for autonomous flight, or was that moot because it remained with visual line of sight?
ขอบคุณมากครับกับสาระดีที่น่าสนใจติดตามเช่นเคย❤❤❤
Hi, is it possible to operate twin fins by a 6 channel transmitter? If yes, kindly advise how to do that. Thanks and Regards
By "fins", do you mean ailerons? Elevons? Rudders? Elevators? Landing flaps?
In general, if you have two flight control surfaces that do the same thing, simply connect the two servos to the same output. Two rudders would both be connected to the rudder output.
Where you want the surfaces to move opposite one another such as for ailerons, mount the servos mirror-image, the tops of both servos pointed toward the center of the plane, or both pointed outward. By mounting the servos as mirror-image, the movement will be equal and opposite.
With INAV, the transmitter only needs to send throttle, pitch, roll, and yaw. Plus Arm.
It's then up to *INAV* to control motors, ailerons, rudders, elevators, etc.
yes, you only need 5 to control the aircraft, 4 for the main flight controls, 1 for arming, if you do not have physical arming switch, or arm remotely using a telemetry radio. then the last for a mode switch, but not absolutely neccesary if you already have the aircraft set up and do not need to switch modes. but most radios have 6 channels, so you are good to go.