I would like to point out the maus and ifv puma could theoretically be used in the same line up only .6 of a BR separates them and 1 rank that means a WW2 super heavy can be in the same battle as a modern still in production IFV which in reality are sepereated by 54 years based on design starts
@@axeavier it has too much armor for that BR though if the game gave you the option to spawn a maus after getting a certain amount of kills then it would make a bit more sense
What's funny that it is still missing *even more* armor, lol. And most subsystems are still broken. It should be at least 10.3+ Funnily enough, with the right AMAP Armor inserts, it should be resistant to 120mm APFSDS over the frontal arc, at least thats what the manufacturer say, lol. Probably the only vehicle in the world that is currently better protected than the is T-14/T-15, lol. It is fucking nuts. I will just copy my list of whats broken from my comment under spookstons video, because i am not typing that again lol. Hopefully they fix this stuff and move it up. ost of it has been bug reported, as far as i am aware of. Here is the list: -2 layers of armor on the UFP are missing (Edit: Seems fixed now) -The frontal "exterior fuel tanks" are actually AMAP Armor inserts that can be taken out to lower weight for transport in a A400M -LFP is wrong -Sides are missing additional armor under the ERA and on the lower hull sides -The front corner boxes are also armor (not sure if ERA or passive) not 5mm structural steel -The back is missing armor (should be protected against russian 14.5mm) -Turret is missing NERA armor plates -CLARA ERA is missing its KE protection -CLARA ERA on the Puma is only triggered by EFPs and insensitve to other attacks(such as KE), so it should only explode when hit by HEAT (More sensitive CLARA exists but is not used) -Transmission is wrong, should be 6/6 not 10/5 -Reverse is wrong. It is not capped at -30kmh -Thermals are still wrong (i think ?) should be gen3 (the forums found the actual resolution+zoom and angle) -Commander optics is missing zoom -MUSS is broken, should provide 360° by 70° protection -MUSS directional auto smoke is missing -Helicopter warning is missing -PMC308 HETF should be KETF -FCS for the KETF Ammo is missing, (makes it act like proxy fuze, can Auto track & lead Helis) -Ammo feed is wrong. Should be 200 rounds contious feed, then reload from Hull ammo -Gun feed is wrong, it is open bolt double fed. There is no delay between ammo switching -Name is wrong, ffs. Should be "Spz. Puma" not "PUMA". Edits: updated / fixed some spelling
@@fabianhenrich4697 I wish :P I bet they have some cool stuff there. But no this is all publicly available info, as most of the subsystems can be bought seperatly to integrate in your own tank. The manufacturer literally offer you the data and spec sheets for download. And most of the armor info is from the ERA testing reports, industry articles written by the manufacturer or from pictures during production, maintanace or air lift, as you can get a clear look at the armor beneath the external stuff there. It is all on youtube.
I mean I'm not surprised by the warthunder version of this vehicle missing so many features, just reading that list of missing features & incorrectly modelled stuff that are actually fitted to standard Bundeswehr vehicles makes it 10.3 BR worthy right off the bat. Not to mention like 3/4 of the MBT's in the game wish they had even a quarter of those missing features...
Hey Odd.... maybe consider checking out the biggest gun mounted on a plane, the one on the P.108? The AP belts alone costs 100 sp, it's honestly a challenge video idea
yesterday I was watching Bo Time playing this and I thought "That's the kind of vehicle Odd would definitely get a nuke". And here we are today. Well done!
Odd could we get a video on the Turm 3? I’m interested to see what you could pull off with it and I feel like if anyone could pull off a spectacular game in it, it would be you. Have a good day Odd.
@@OddBawZ Jokes on you Scottish man gaijin says the money well has dried up they're to busy swimming in their disgusting premium a10 money to pay you... 😁
i trued it in the test drive and its coax 30mm was insane enough to ammo rack the rear of a T10s turret and as a japan main i know it can ammo rack the side of an IS4 as you can with a Type 87 RCV. I think high tier germany just got mad OP
So many people want to this going up in br witch i compleatly agree. But so should BMP-2M. If they are going to put PUMA to 9.3 they should do the same to the BMP-2M witch has lot more going for that the PUMA. Less pen in the autocannon but has 8 1200mm penning tandem missles. But we will most likely see the PUMA going 9.3 while Russian IFVs staying at the same br.
Maybe because the PUMA can actually ignore/survive a few hits from almost everything while the BMP goes poof if hit by anything? The PUMA’s current BR is embarrassingly low considering the APFSDS belt and ridiculous armor.
I wait to watch your videos until I don't feel great. The laughter and amusement at blowing stuff up in WarThunder always puts a smile on my face. Thanks BawZ, glad to see you back
its gonna be 13.7 by the time we unlock it cause wallet warriors who been point and clicking won't know how to kill it and make gaijin put it higher (and the hate German Tech gets from the average playerbase)
@@CarryPotter007 or the opposite, although unlikely effect of the german average player being too damn stupid to do anything but die when using it Resulting in a downtier lmao
The first time I saw this thing I legit thought it was a hacker. He drove out of cover in front of our team, killed a bunch of us, and when he finally got lit on fire he put it out and just drove away.
Odd: *Plays a German IFV* Also Odd: *Gets a nuke* I think I'd like to issue you a challenge master Bawz: Get a nuke with all IFVs that you haven't gotten one with. They seem to be ideally suited for the task.
@@CallmeRoth and? You had to pay anyway, so it is just 'pay more'. I don't have to pay for the PUMA, equal playingfield for everyone to get it. Tell me how I get the PT 76-57 without paying again?
Honestly if this thing got all it’s bells and whistles it would fit in at 11.0 It’s very strange that the worlds first Ana’s most recent IFVs are in the same br range
@@JoviaI1 nah, if it still had the aphe I’d agree with you, although the SAP-HE is pretty nice because I’ve over pressured a lot of Soviet mbts just by spamming from 1000m lol. But if it still had the aphe which could one shot anything from the sides short of a is6 it def would deserve the 9.3+ br
@@averagedaredevilenjoyer5733 ypu gotta remember the proxy shell alone warrents 9.0. If the fucking york has to be 9.0 so should the vehicle that can kill legit everything.
Yeah I've been fighting them with my 8.0 bradley and it's a struggle only way to fight it Is in the front is by disabling the gun and active protection
Best tip: Use APFSDS from the front to take out the engine or if you get a side shot it will most likely kill all of its crew, I run T-72AV Turms T and this is my biggest enemy since I’m always out in matches against germany
Fabulous video. As a low level player ( 5 lol) the one lesson I learned from you and Fly-dayly is, just like real-estate, the most important thing is location, location, location 😉
Not gonna play WT until it goes up. 8.3 is now germany vs rest of the world and still they win. There are only Pumas and Begleits now, sometimes a lonely TAM. 8.3 is unplayable in every other nation than germany and this IFV is doing well even at 11.0... Funny thing to see this modern IFV with cold war shit aside
2 of the vehicles you mentioned are 8.7 but we can let that slide. The secret to killing the Puma is the turret... all the ammo goes woosh, and they cant fire back until they get to a cap and rearm
Hey @OddBawz - I'm late to the party on VFW video, but is there any chance for you to endorse the suggestion of "final version" of VFW on the forums? There was historically a unit which was sent to italy to fight along flak trucks and it had the same gun as the flak truck. If gaijin made it as another event vehicle, or even better a premium, more people could have it. And for the record, I have VFW and it's glorious, but it's also something that teaches shooting in the game really well.
As soon as it hit's 9.3, which will happen in the next BR Update, it's survivability won't be a thing anymore. I will probably never play this thing since I don't want to do a stock grind with this shit stock belt it has. And when it's at 9.3 or even higher there is practically no reason anymore to do a stock grind on this thing.
I get that its got less pen than the strf 9040b, is almost as big as maus, slower than average fire rate, and no missiles. But why did you think it would suck?
@@JoviaI1 has more armor than the marder 1a3 (which can already stop 30mm apds frontaly almost point blank), has era, nera, and external fuel tanks lining the sides, has an unmanned turret, has a massive amount of dead space in the back, and has a frontaly mounted engine(well known for tanking shots in war thunder). Tell me how no one thought this ifv which has more armor than any other ifv in game wouldnt have the best survivability of any ifv in game.
I like it, but Type 89 is still much better, since you can also engage frontally because it has missiles. Similar pen on the gun and fire rate. They nerfed the turret speed though with this update :(
You completely forgot one of the best things about the puma, it has EXTREMELY good ERA and overall protection. It in many situations has better armour than MBTs
I think MUSS is not working correctly for now. Devblog mentioned auto detection of inbound ATGM, and it seem to be not working now. This will be even more survivable when that IRCM works as intended.
No reason for this vehicle facing 7.3s Put it at 9.0. Sabot can barely pen the thing, not even mentioning heat which can’t touch it. No clue what Gaijin was thinking with this one
I know the T34 and King Tiger were uptiering themselves since this thing is 8.3 - but I really feel like RB needs to be balanced based on the years the tank was deployed instead of BR based on some weird assumption of its lethality (ie 1950-1955 MM instead of BR 7.2 [6.2-8.2 MM]). All of these tanks had their place in the threatscape of their time but the way Gaijin sets up the BRs you end up with tanks from an era where computers took up warehouses fighting things slinging shells and missiles with computers in the shell. It will be a PITA finding a system for the paper tanks and prototypes but I think overall it would be well worth the effort.
This takes more shots to kill than an MBT, it took 3 shots to finally kill this thing, if only them ammo actually exploded when hit would make it fightable when it's Hull down
@@CarryPotter007 dont quote me on this but it might have more ammo in the hull, as when I charged it after hitting ammo I had gotten shot, could be someone else shooting me tho idk
I wonder if and when they will add the spike ATGM to this, also if they will make it a separate vehicle or just add it to this vehicle and change the tech tree?
Im pretty sure the MUSS aps system is broken because normally the sensors on the puma would detect the ATGM and then the jammer above the commander's optic is supposed to swing around to face the ATGM without you having to turn the turret
They done it on purpose this thing would have perfect on 9.3-9.7 but now they sure now have public support the nerf the fuck out of it. That basically means MORE REPAIR COST, COULD NERF THE APFSD BELT at the same time increasing the br. Well played gaijin well played.
TBH it is OP and not OP. You can ammo rack this thing VERY fast. THe armor is quite nice on it but when i played it i knew that they eventually raise this thing in BR. Im guessing 9.3 or even 10.7
How can you ammo rack it when your barrel got Wile E Coyote'd in .5 seconds from it having line of sight of you while the Puma was on the move because it's stabilized and you're in a tank designed in 1944?
@@CyberneticArgumentCreator tanks from 1944 can't face the puma those are at max 6.7 while the PUMA is at 8.3, though I do agree that the PUMA should go up to 8.7/9.0
@@GBR9794 In what universe are you living in where a WWII tank can realistically have better situational awareness on the battlefield than something with gen 3 thermals?
Oddballs another great video, my take on the puma is atm it's a must have vehicle. I wonder how long it's going to be before you start getting games with 80%+ being pumas.
Idk why that thing is 8.3.. I couldn't kill it with T-54 1951 , T-54 1947 or BMP-1. It survived every shell. It even absorbs APHE. It didnt even kill the crew. Direct hit made crew turn only yellow.
HOW MUCH DO YOU HATE THIS THING? LOL
Yay
its horrible but playing it is the best
I actually quite like it... when its me using it
None at all, been having a blast killing them by the truck load
Meanwhile me playing with the 1942 t-34
I would like to point out the maus and ifv puma could theoretically be used in the same line up only .6 of a BR separates them and 1 rank that means a WW2 super heavy can be in the same battle as a modern still in production IFV which in reality are sepereated by 54 years based on design starts
*DO NOT QUESTION GAIJIN'S MONEY MAKING STRATS*
@@CarryPotter007 gaijin owning the whiners with fac… oh wait nvm random bullshit with no basis in reality
And Puma might survive more hits lol.
Maus should be at 5.0 so it can be with WW2
@@axeavier it has too much armor for that BR though
if the game gave you the option to spawn a maus after getting a certain amount of kills then it would make a bit more sense
What's funny that it is still missing *even more* armor, lol. And most subsystems are still broken. It should be at least 10.3+ Funnily enough, with the right AMAP Armor inserts, it should be resistant to 120mm APFSDS over the frontal arc, at least thats what the manufacturer say, lol. Probably the only vehicle in the world that is currently better protected than the is T-14/T-15, lol. It is fucking nuts. I will just copy my list of whats broken from my comment under spookstons video, because i am not typing that again lol. Hopefully they fix this stuff and move it up. ost of it has been bug reported, as far as i am aware of. Here is the list:
-2 layers of armor on the UFP are missing (Edit: Seems fixed now)
-The frontal "exterior fuel tanks" are actually AMAP Armor inserts that can be taken out to lower weight for transport in a A400M
-LFP is wrong
-Sides are missing additional armor under the ERA and on the lower hull sides
-The front corner boxes are also armor (not sure if ERA or passive) not 5mm structural steel
-The back is missing armor (should be protected against russian 14.5mm)
-Turret is missing NERA armor plates
-CLARA ERA is missing its KE protection
-CLARA ERA on the Puma is only triggered by EFPs and insensitve to other attacks(such as KE), so it should only explode when hit by HEAT (More sensitive CLARA exists but is not used)
-Transmission is wrong, should be 6/6 not 10/5
-Reverse is wrong. It is not capped at -30kmh
-Thermals are still wrong (i think ?) should be gen3 (the forums found the actual resolution+zoom and angle)
-Commander optics is missing zoom
-MUSS is broken, should provide 360° by 70° protection
-MUSS directional auto smoke is missing
-Helicopter warning is missing
-PMC308 HETF should be KETF
-FCS for the KETF Ammo is missing, (makes it act like proxy fuze, can Auto track & lead Helis)
-Ammo feed is wrong. Should be 200 rounds contious feed, then reload from Hull ammo
-Gun feed is wrong, it is open bolt double fed. There is no delay between ammo switching
-Name is wrong, ffs. Should be "Spz. Puma" not "PUMA".
Edits: updated / fixed some spelling
The insider from the Wehrtechnische Dienststelle 91 has spoken. :D
@@fabianhenrich4697 I wish :P I bet they have some cool stuff there.
But no this is all publicly available info, as most of the subsystems can be bought seperatly to integrate in your own tank. The manufacturer literally offer you the data and spec sheets for download. And most of the armor info is from the ERA testing reports, industry articles written by the manufacturer or from pictures during production, maintanace or air lift, as you can get a clear look at the armor beneath the external stuff there. It is all on youtube.
I mean I'm not surprised by the warthunder version of this vehicle missing so many features, just reading that list of missing features & incorrectly modelled stuff that are actually fitted to standard Bundeswehr vehicles makes it 10.3 BR worthy right off the bat. Not to mention like 3/4 of the MBT's in the game wish they had even a quarter of those missing features...
My apfds from Xm1 crhysler bounces off the front of the puma
@@genchar692
F for your poor Apfsds Round. Maybe it lacked coffee? In its current state, that should be happening. I guess you got gajin'd.
Hey Odd.... maybe consider checking out the biggest gun mounted on a plane, the one on the P.108? The AP belts alone costs 100 sp, it's honestly a challenge video idea
he already did one
here is the link: ua-cam.com/video/oENoXRXjoXE/v-deo.html
He already did one
Because of the guns poor accuracy it's really not that great in ground rb
May be good in naval though
yesterday I was watching Bo Time playing this and I thought "That's the kind of vehicle Odd would definitely get a nuke". And here we are today. Well done!
Odd could we get a video on the Turm 3? I’m interested to see what you could pull off with it and I feel like if anyone could pull off a spectacular game in it, it would be you. Have a good day Odd.
I’ll buy it when I get paid!
@@OddBawZ sounds good
@@OddBawZ Jokes on you Scottish man gaijin says the money well has dried up they're to busy swimming in their disgusting premium a10 money to pay you... 😁
i trued it in the test drive and its coax 30mm was insane enough to ammo rack the rear of a T10s turret and as a japan main i know it can ammo rack the side of an IS4 as you can with a Type 87 RCV. I think high tier germany just got mad OP
@@notsoracistraspberry4168 tried*
I have been playing the Puma at 11.3 and it still slaps people its amazing
So many people want to this going up in br witch i compleatly agree. But so should BMP-2M. If they are going to put PUMA to 9.3 they should do the same to the BMP-2M witch has lot more going for that the PUMA. Less pen in the autocannon but has 8 1200mm penning tandem missles. But we will most likely see the PUMA going 9.3 while Russian IFVs staying at the same br.
Maybe because the PUMA can actually ignore/survive a few hits from almost everything while the BMP goes poof if hit by anything? The PUMA’s current BR is embarrassingly low considering the APFSDS belt and ridiculous armor.
@@daniel_f4050 and once uptiered all the ERA will be useless since no one is shooting HEAT-FS, and the atgms that u see wont get stopped by MUSS 😂
@@FinalBossNunu Good the wehraboo's deserve to cry and be salty...
I absolutely agree. The BMP-2M and many others are a complete menace. I’m so sick of seeing whole teams of light tanks coming out of spawn! Lol
My beautiful BMP-2M can straight up go to 11.0 comfortablely.
Test question : Sunday + oddbawz
Hmmm carry the o.. subtract the s.. add a f..
Answer: FUNDAY! 🤓
"Looks like a pack of PUMAs heading your way, better prepare yourself"
Me playing war thunder's newest mode, deep rock germany
the fact this was 8.3 was a crime against humanity
look at that 8.3 puma, I miss it
I wait to watch your videos until I don't feel great. The laughter and amusement at blowing stuff up in WarThunder always puts a smile on my face.
Thanks BawZ, glad to see you back
Been grinding to 8.3 as fast as i could since i heard of the Puma coming, 120k rp left on it, incredibly excited to be able to play it
u better hurry up before they uptier in a few days after people slow down on buying it.
You better hope you can get it's APFSDS before the inevitable uptier
its gonna be 13.7 by the time we unlock it cause wallet warriors who been point and clicking won't know how to kill it and make gaijin put it higher (and the hate German Tech gets from the average playerbase)
@@CarryPotter007 or the opposite, although unlikely effect of the german average player being too damn stupid to do anything but die when using it
Resulting in a downtier lmao
@@OvercastCoob yeah that only really mostly happens to 5.3 players or premium/event vehicle players. so your analogy doesn't hold well.
Makes sense why i havent had too many issues facing this thing, holy cow that stock grind is definitely gnarly.
Puma with missiles..."I have become Death, Destroyer of worlds."
The first time I saw this thing I legit thought it was a hacker. He drove out of cover in front of our team, killed a bunch of us, and when he finally got lit on fire he put it out and just drove away.
First time I heard that thing's cannon and saw what it was doing, I was very happy to be a German main.
Odd: *Plays a German IFV*
Also Odd: *Gets a nuke*
I think I'd like to issue you a challenge master Bawz: Get a nuke with all IFVs that you haven't gotten one with. They seem to be ideally suited for the task.
I'll start getting it today and it will be 9.3 and nerfed by the end of the week. Good to see how powerful it could have been.
Germany can't have nice things because other nations will instantly cry
@@GameZocker22 Germany has consistently the most undertiered things in war thunder. What version are you playing? xD
cc2099 what does br matter when everything germany has is a tin can using a straw gun with spitball ammunition?
Still feel less hate towards this, than the PT 76-57
2 of the most broken vehicles im War Thunder. Gaijin knows why to do it. People rush to research both of them paying money to grind faster...
@@joaquincimas1707 76-57 wasn't in research tree.
@@jasonvorhees1795 still had a pay to get faster option
@@CallmeRoth and? You had to pay anyway, so it is just 'pay more'. I don't have to pay for the PUMA, equal playingfield for everyone to get it.
Tell me how I get the PT 76-57 without paying again?
Odd is such a war thunder chad he doesn't even use his laser rangefinder.
Gaijin dropping one over powered IFV after another into the game. It's astonishing
Honestly if this thing got all it’s bells and whistles it would fit in at 11.0
It’s very strange that the worlds first Ana’s most recent IFVs are in the same br range
you the man Odd! Glad you’re back and feeling better brother!
Winters over need to replace hoodies with odd swim trunks.
10:18 You pronounced Rooikat perfectly!
Awesome content as usual. The work you put into your editing is well invested. A joy to watch!
Good to see you back Odd ... Hope you can stay happy and healthy
Had a match last 30seconds ( pretty much 30 seconds ) because the enemy team pushed the high ground with like 4 pumas and a begal
Was insane to watch
As a german I am glad that the Puma at least does well in War Thunder. Maybe it will in reality too, if Gajin got some classified info again :)
Wow! You sure bounced a lot of shots. I expected it to be about as survivable as the WWII Puma. Your vid really showcased this vehicle’s strengths.
Puma made me realize how OP would be T-14 Armata if it ever got introduced.
This is 10.0 now and i cant belive it was 8,3 at one point!
Between this and the stab on the begal, germany won the patch. I think the Puma stole the show, way more fun than the A-10
And the Turm III which is actually great. The begal still being at 8.7 after the buff is a crime though. Both it and the PUMA belong at 9.3
@@JoviaI1 nah, if it still had the aphe I’d agree with you, although the SAP-HE is pretty nice because I’ve over pressured a lot of Soviet mbts just by spamming from 1000m lol. But if it still had the aphe which could one shot anything from the sides short of a is6 it def would deserve the 9.3+ br
@@averagedaredevilenjoyer5733 ypu gotta remember the proxy shell alone warrents 9.0. If the fucking york has to be 9.0 so should the vehicle that can kill legit everything.
@@jonathanallen3688 it literally only gets 10rounds
@@stigerking9838 LoL, it literally does not. I can carry full kit of which ever ammo I want. I also have auto purchase ammo turned on.
I'd say put it at 9.3
Its really strong. I was already struggeling in my BMP-2 before.. now its just a turkey shoot for german teams
Bmp-2 counters this thing tho? Faster 30mm cannon with atgm
Yeah I've been fighting them with my 8.0 bradley and it's a struggle only way to fight it Is in the front is by disabling the gun and active protection
I agree this thing should be at 9.3
@@ln7929 how many missiles did you put Into the puma with the Bradley
@@joestueckrath5275 i try to shoot under the gun
12:37 Mr No Breach....must be a James Bond villain ;)
BMP-1s having to fight this thing was the real april fool's gag this year.
You should play the PUMA again since it’s at 9.3 now, it’s gotten a lot tougher to use now with all the APSFDS being widely used in that BR.
I've been talking to myself with a thick Scottish accent since i found your channel last week. its hillarious.
That's wicked fast dart slingin
Actual PUMA gameplay
Look to the enemy and TUC,TUC,TUC,TUC,TUC
*Target detroyed*
Got killed by this thing today, definitely feels untouchable no matter how many shots u get on it
It'd be absolutely on fire with this thing! I laughed when you ignored the fact that his was pulling 63lm/h on snow.. That is absolutely insane!
Best tip: Use APFSDS from the front to take out the engine or if you get a side shot it will most likely kill all of its crew, I run T-72AV Turms T and this is my biggest enemy since I’m always out in matches against germany
Fabulous video. As a low level player ( 5 lol) the one lesson I learned from you and Fly-dayly is, just like real-estate, the most important thing is location, location, location 😉
Like for pronouncing rooikat correctly:)
Good to have you back in action Odd
Not gonna play WT until it goes up. 8.3 is now germany vs rest of the world and still they win. There are only Pumas and Begleits now, sometimes a lonely TAM. 8.3 is unplayable in every other nation than germany and this IFV is doing well even at 11.0... Funny thing to see this modern IFV with cold war shit aside
2 of the vehicles you mentioned are 8.7 but we can let that slide. The secret to killing the Puma is the turret... all the ammo goes woosh, and they cant fire back until they get to a cap and rearm
why not play it?
@@EnterTheFenix that doesn’t sound like killing at all. More like “counter it at least somehow”.
@@CarryPotter007 because I grind 3 nations with this br currently.... So yeah, I'm screwed
"The 'W' is strong with this vehicle!" Love it!
What br was the puma when this was filmed?????
Ever since I saw your vid on the 2500 I’ve been using in everyone of my lineups thanks
Absolutely amazing content Odd.. Love your commentary too! btw your "R" pronunciation is spot on for the Rooikat
Hey @OddBawz - I'm late to the party on VFW video, but is there any chance for you to endorse the suggestion of "final version" of VFW on the forums? There was historically a unit which was sent to italy to fight along flak trucks and it had the same gun as the flak truck. If gaijin made it as another event vehicle, or even better a premium, more people could have it. And for the record, I have VFW and it's glorious, but it's also something that teaches shooting in the game really well.
As soon as it hit's 9.3, which will happen in the next BR Update, it's survivability won't be a thing anymore. I will probably never play this thing since I don't want to do a stock grind with this shit stock belt it has. And when it's at 9.3 or even higher there is practically no reason anymore to do a stock grind on this thing.
I get that its got less pen than the strf 9040b, is almost as big as maus, slower than average fire rate, and no missiles. But why did you think it would suck?
Because nobody expected it to be the most survivable vehicle at it's BR. The survivability is what makes it. Not the auto-cannon or the speed.
@@JoviaI1 has more armor than the marder 1a3 (which can already stop 30mm apds frontaly almost point blank), has era, nera, and external fuel tanks lining the sides, has an unmanned turret, has a massive amount of dead space in the back, and has a frontaly mounted engine(well known for tanking shots in war thunder). Tell me how no one thought this ifv which has more armor than any other ifv in game wouldnt have the best survivability of any ifv in game.
@@subject204ghost3 Because it's not on the stat card.
@@JoviaI1 did you people forget the dev server existed?
@@JoviaI1 it’s more survivalable than some 10.0+mbt’s
I like it, but Type 89 is still much better, since you can also engage frontally because it has missiles. Similar pen on the gun and fire rate. They nerfed the turret speed though with this update :(
What are you smoking? That Puma is penning tanks the Type 89 can only dream of.
You completely forgot one of the best things about the puma, it has EXTREMELY good ERA and overall protection. It in many situations has better armour than MBTs
This thing is basically a pt 76 57 with heavy tank survivability
I’ve been playing with leo 1 marder and m48. getting uptiered is fun because i end up having like 3-4 pumas on my team
Are you also getting a 100% win rate now like I am? If there are PUMAs on my team, I'm winning.
Germany is raining with win rates rn, with Pumas and buffed Bagleitpanzer
And it can face the zachlam... Nice one gaijin
Puma 8.3: thermal yes, stabilizer yes, survivability yes
Typ 87RCV: ........
I love the puma 3rd day of using it and i have set a new high score of assists for myself and got a nuke what i never had perfect XD
Good to have you back my dude. Hope all is well! /thumbs up/
in that first game there was 3 hits where ping played a part, its not hard to queue to servers where you have fair ping
This devil of an ifv takes a painful amount of time to kill with the a10
I think MUSS is not working correctly for now. Devblog mentioned auto detection of inbound ATGM, and it seem to be not working now. This will be even more survivable when that IRCM works as intended.
I’m so glad our boy is back
Finally German gets an IFV with decent thermals
An IFV that should be in 9.3 at lower
@@joaquincimas1707
As so many more ...
@@mandernachluca3774 bmp 2m could be at 11.0 and still be fine
For the algorithm! For the content!! FOR ODDBAWZ!!!
Its the R3 T20 of top tier
Not remotely. The R3 could always be killed by sneezing in its general direction. This thing is undeadable.
And it didnt even have the spike system😂 Hope it comes soon
From the people who bring us up the "Maus" now here comes the Puma!
No reason for this vehicle facing 7.3s Put it at 9.0. Sabot can barely pen the thing, not even mentioning heat which can’t touch it. No clue what Gaijin was thinking with this one
Shooting sound of this thing is just insane
This thing's sick in a downtier, can't wait for its br increase
"I only have 80 rounds left." lol op tank.
I know the T34 and King Tiger were uptiering themselves since this thing is 8.3 - but I really feel like RB needs to be balanced based on the years the tank was deployed instead of BR based on some weird assumption of its lethality (ie 1950-1955 MM instead of BR 7.2 [6.2-8.2 MM]). All of these tanks had their place in the threatscape of their time but the way Gaijin sets up the BRs you end up with tanks from an era where computers took up warehouses fighting things slinging shells and missiles with computers in the shell. It will be a PITA finding a system for the paper tanks and prototypes but I think overall it would be well worth the effort.
The PUMA in its current state is easily a 9.7+ vehicle. Gaijin just really missed the mark by a tremendous margin with this thing.
Just got to love the German tech tree vehicles
This takes more shots to kill than an MBT, it took 3 shots to finally kill this thing, if only them ammo actually exploded when hit would make it fightable when it's Hull down
i mean... shoot the ammo and its basically knocked out until it restocks at a cap point (if it doesn't push and bother your team XD)
@@CarryPotter007 dont quote me on this but it might have more ammo in the hull, as when I charged it after hitting ammo I had gotten shot, could be someone else shooting me tho idk
@@thomasattard9821 Nah when you hit the ammo it only has 1 round left in the breech so after it shoots once after getting ammo racked its out of ammo
@@mainblue22 ah ok then, must have been another puma lmao
As usual gold tier content. Keep up the good work Odd
I was looking forward for this video!
Today, gentlemen, we witness the efficacy of violent action.
This thing is insane Oddz, you were ripping and tearing!
looks like its working as intended, i think its perfect where it is
Trust me man enough players are gonna cry cause puma to op them it gets nerfed and germany suffers again
I wonder if and when they will add the spike ATGM to this, also if they will make it a separate vehicle or just add it to this vehicle and change the tech tree?
ok maybe 8.7 is good but not any higher for god's sake, good line up for light tank players
Im pretty sure the MUSS aps system is broken because normally the sensors on the puma would detect the ATGM and then the jammer above the commander's optic is supposed to swing around to face the ATGM without you having to turn the turret
but ingame this doesn't seem to be the case
IS-2 vs PUMA-IFV: realistic, historical, very delicate balance...
Countries should use wt to determine which IFV to buy
This confirms it, gaijin can't balance modern IFVs
the pt-76-57 finally has some competition
What country is this tank from?
They done it on purpose this thing would have perfect on 9.3-9.7 but now they sure now have public support the nerf the fuck out of it. That basically means MORE REPAIR COST, COULD NERF THE APFSD BELT at the same time increasing the br. Well played gaijin well played.
Bf-109 G6 with 3 30mms would be awesome to see in a video
Lower BR's: F'in Puma. Higher BR's: F'in PUMA.
Cool sounding cannon.
TBH it is OP and not OP. You can ammo rack this thing VERY fast. THe armor is quite nice on it but when i played it i knew that they eventually raise this thing in BR. Im guessing 9.3 or even 10.7
How can you ammo rack it when your barrel got Wile E Coyote'd in .5 seconds from it having line of sight of you while the Puma was on the move because it's stabilized and you're in a tank designed in 1944?
@@CyberneticArgumentCreator get good and study peeker's advantage
kill it today front armor with no problem at all with object906 heat-fs round
@@CyberneticArgumentCreator tanks from 1944 can't face the puma those are at max 6.7 while the PUMA is at 8.3, though I do agree that the PUMA should go up to 8.7/9.0
@@GBR9794 In what universe are you living in where a WWII tank can realistically have better situational awareness on the battlefield than something with gen 3 thermals?
Full broadsiding on a puma is insane
Oddballs another great video, my take on the puma is atm it's a must have vehicle. I wonder how long it's going to be before you start getting games with 80%+ being pumas.
Idk why that thing is 8.3..
I couldn't kill it with T-54 1951 , T-54 1947 or BMP-1. It survived every shell. It even absorbs APHE. It didnt even kill the crew.
Direct hit made crew turn only yellow.