Total War - What Your Favourite Title Says About YOU?
Вставка
- Опубліковано 9 вер 2024
- What does your favourite Total War Title say about your Personality?
Honestly, nothing at all... But I thought it would be a good laugh XD
From Shogun 1 to, Rome and Medieval 2, to Rome 2, Attila, Warhammer and the Sagas (imagine liking the Sagas XD).
Discord: / discord
Twitter: / melkor83677456
Enjoy : )
So, which one(s) are you?
Im so divisive in my mindset, But im probably a mash-up of Rome 2, Attila, Medieval 2 and empire. However the first total war game that i had played as a kid was The Original Medieval TW and have played every one since except for thrones of britannia and troy lol
I am between Attila and shogun 2
Attilla! Your description was perfect btw. I love the time period.
I'll admit it's Empire. And yes it's because of the time period.
I like Roma 2 it’s really improved since launch and the mods make it better.I prefer it over Rome 1 because of 2 mods and realism and the time period
Rome Total War: You hate Gauls (gods, you hate them). And your grandfather hates them too.
And you want to conquer the stinking world.
Even before they put out his eyes?
They take or little sons and turn them into little grandfathers
Even before they put out his eyes
My grandpa introduced me to rome, and we spent many hours hating gauls. Then they put out his eyes
"Empire Total War: you don't like Empire Total War"
Absolute kek.
Funni guns go pew pew
I've never seen a more accurate description of a reason to play Troy.
Actually i have its free
Reason to not play it: No mod support until steam🤷🏻♂️
Attila - You think Dark Souls is far too casual!
After this video, I spent a good 20 minutes looking for "Is there an Ultra Easy Mode Mod?" in the Atilla Workshop 😅
Oh shit
yup thats me ;-;
Now when i think of it : it was always me who was asking my friends to play these games, i've gifted 2-3 Attila games and a few of Souls games... My friends don't like these games as much as i do :( and i don't even play these games for chalenge, i just like them that much :(
@@VitalityTrixie same here ;-;
This. I play on hard. Most people ive met fan of TW, all say' Attila is too hard '
*sees medieval 2 description*
That's not me, is it?
*description continues*
Oh god, it might be?1
He said that Napoleon players have moved on to Paradox...while true for some.. Wouldn't that have been the same for Medevil 2 fans going into Crusader Kings. I love NAPOLEON but Victoria 2 or paradox are so limited...Most Napoleon fans switched over to HOLDFAST and Mount and Blade:Napoelonic. For me
Paradox games(Victoria 2) don't even compare to the genius of Napoleon. Napoleon is like watching the movie WATERLO 1970 , the MUSIC, the COLORS, the Tactics, the Beauty of a Square formation on a Cave Charge and full VOLLEY.
There is nothing like Napoleon, it's like listening to Wagner.
I guarantee that after you play napoleon online and play the Campaing of the Coalation and Napoleons campain, you will CRY when NAPOLEON says goodbye to the
OLD GUARD.
No video game has given me the feels. You control the legendary OLD GUARD, and you see them on film ..and ugh..the feels.
ua-cam.com/video/h5bW-YXZvOU/v-deo.html
@@robroux5059 Until recently Med2 was my favorite Total War game, but I wouldn't say that applies to me.
When you play Paradox games for a while you start realising how unimaginatively shallow they all are. Victoria 2 sits on top with its deep economy and POP systems which I love, but after too many hours I'm starting to feel the limitations of it. CK2 got ruined by DLC bloat and a turn from being a realistic nobility sim to a "lol so randumb xD" meme game, and the active avoidance to implement more complex feudal mechanics. Other Paradox games have been simplified down to become unplayable to me, compare HoI3 to Hoi4 or EU3 to EU4. Haven't played CK3 because I find the UI god-awful.
Definitely me. I'm 49. I started with Command & Conquer. Star Wars: Supremacy, Star Trek: BOTF & my first civ game being Civilization: Call to power before moving onto the official civ series. First TW was Rome: TW. Played all apart form 3K & Troy and now play Paradox games - my favourite being Stellaris as the others miss the real time battles I enjoy.
Me: looks at hours in steam library knowing full well that I have more from my old computer, “oh god that is me”.
Melkor, what’s your favourite thing in the world?
“ 5:53 “
I've never jumped down to a comment section faster then when I heard that. I was shook like... Did he really just say that!?!?!
When I wrote the script, I noticed nothing.
When I said it on camera, I noticed nothing.
I only noticed once I started editing and it was too late : (
@@MelkorGG I thought that was intentional, lol.
Medieval 2: For when you need to go on *just* one more Crusade
Crusades are a pain. The Popes a pain -"But they attacked ME" Mongols and Timurids are fun if you're playing at that side of the map.
@@antonycharnock2993 I took Rome then entire Italian peninsula as Venice, Pope still calling crusade against me when he owns no land lol
@@Aester I remember killing the pope and finding out that he respawns infinitely, and then killing him every turn afterwards out of spite.
You can crusade for the Lady on Arabie
Thrones of Britannia: Probably got sacked by a Viking a bit too hard
Melkor is a Viking. He's from Yorkshire. We're all Vikings here!
Cap no one likes that game
I’ve only ever played Rome Total war so idk if it qualifies as a favourite haha.
Lol same
I played rtw 10 years ago. Now I own all of the tw series on steam and still only play rtw. It's a good and simple game.
@@jorgeserna8411 dont forget shogun 2
@@danzo3376 it’s cool and all but, can’t compare to the European titles where each country has actual diverse units. Not just the same roster.
Me too.
My take on this:
Shogun 1: Probably has a virtual machine running Windows XP
Medieval 1: Either a very hardcore person or someone who enjoys the simpler times
Rome 1: Likely someone still disappointed in Rome 2's release
Medieval 2: A very fanatical person whose game rather not be talked negatively
Empire: Enjoys playing mods
Napoleon: Enjoys playing multiplayer
Shogun 2: Enjoys playing multiplayer (even more)
Rome 2: Someone's first TW game
Attila: Likely understands game design or is a history nerd
Thrones of Britannia: Likely got the head squeezed between the door
Warhammer 1/2: Enjoys fantasy settings
3K: Enjoys fantasy settings
Troy: Enjoys fantasy settings
XD Rome 1 is so true for me :)
@@MelkorGG DUM DA DA DUM. BOMMM BOM BOMM. Bom de de bom bom.....Watch Time Commanders from the early 00's when they showcased Rome: TW
Rome 2 is so accurate. The new players dont realize what they were missing in the golden age.
Apologies for a lack of understanding, but I don't see how you could say the same thing about Warhammer 1/2, Three Kingdoms, and Troy. I mean, the events of Troy are mostly mythical and those of Three Kingdoms are largely based on the embellished novelization of the events rather than the events themselves, but I wouldn't call them "fantasy" (at least for Three Kingdoms) on the same level as Warhammer.
@@grantexploit5903 eeh I was thinking of adding something in the brackets like fantasy (mythological) and fantasy (romance) for troy/3K. My bad on that one.
Unpopular opinion but I love the unit cards in Rome II.
RREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!
+1 lol, but maybe cuz I got used to it XD
Blasphemy!
Its all Greek (pottery) to me!
@@peterongan9655 Technically heresy 😂
To be fair I’d say for Rome 1 and Medieval 2: you feel that you have found perfection and find it hard to adapt to changes. Cos I sure as hell didn’t find Rome 2 simple 😂 and warhammer could be a love of variety
I, personally can't handle Medieval 2 now. Years ago i played one campaign and then forgot how to manage anything.
To be fair, between the useless pikes, overpowered heavy cavalry, cumbersome recruitment and units who die because they keep shield bashing for no reason instead of attacking, Medieval 2 is far from perfect.
@@kazanshin4108 wat
@@kazanshin4108 don't forget the infamous two-hander bug, which was only "fixed" in the expansions by making two-hander units stupidly op
@@FoxgirlEriana Oh, don't get me started on that. It's either their animations being too slow to hit anyone or their stats being so ridiculous they make other units look like jokes. I mean seriously, 17MA, 8 CB and 11MD for Aztec Eagles?
My favorite is Attila, so I feel you nailed it. Attila is great for creating weird alt-history situations.
Smooth combat style he says, while clicking the automatic combat button 😕
It is rather smooth button.
Actually it is the only total war game where i can't into combat. Units are working unintuitively for me, cavalry dies against some archers, etc. And sieges. Why anybody would build a castle, if walls just do not exist in a functional sense. Walls just suffer in their misery.
Maybe i need more time to adapt. Few years more.
Doesn't get smoother than that
Barbarian Invasion: You are either a masochist or a sadist
Aw man he forgot about that one.
Or both
That one was brutal.
Emprire Total War
You love artillery so much that you can't put other than that in an army.
Medieval 2 is my favorite.
It's the only one (beyond the first engine games) that works without shenanigans on my computer that doesn't require Steam/Epic Games/online functions!
Ok, this is a pretty neat concept
Really like how thought out the correlations between personality and favorite game
You got my view on Empire down perfectly lol
This man just predicted the future (total war rome remastered)
Rome 2 : wants to be dominated
Atilla : will dominate you
Warhammer : WAAAAH
Damn. The Attila one describes me perfectly. Lets not talk about what gets my rocks off eh?
The original Medieval Total War. Something about the game just plays so well. And I'm not old...lol.
Ambient is perfect in that game, everything looks kinda dark, but colours are bright, all sounds are perfect, just excellent game, also I like chess style of campaign, I want mtw1 remastered, with everything same, just better graphics and way more provinces and factions...
As a paradox and total war fan, the description for Napoleon fans is spot on for me
I came for the jokes but most of these were spot on. I have to defend Troy though. There is clearly a lot of passion that was put into this game and the battle maps are the best we’ve seen since Shogun.
I got Troy for free but after playing it for a while I probably would have paid at least 30 bucks for it or so. It's not a "full" total war game but for what it is, it's unique in that it's the only game set in the bronze age and it's actually pretty fun.
@@cultofthevoid5677 I agree %100. There's plenty of new mechanics. Some of which I hope are brought into the next generation of Total War games. Other mechanics didn't quite work but every Total War game has a couple of those (even Medieval 2 had merchants).
Honestly these days I think it's just become 'cool' to hate new stuff. A lot of folks want to jump on the hater bandwagon just because you know... misery loves company and all that ^^
@@khanofsteppe1667 I'm just happy they released a semi-historical game even if it's not fully historical. With that said, I do think the game has a bit of an identity crisis. I feel like if they were going to go full historical they should have left it at that and if they were going to do historical mythology they should have gone full on with some of the monsters. It's like the game can't decide if it's a history game or a mythology game. Other than that though, the game is still fun and the resource management adds a layer of depth that was missing in other titles.
@@cultofthevoid5677 I quite like what they did with the monsters in Troy, they didn't put real monsters, they put what could've been mistaken for monsters at the time.
I think Troy is a stepping stone, it tries many new things and the ones that work will be kept.
It's inevitable that it will have many flaws and can't be more than a rough gem, but it's worth my time
For the Empire fans, I do not recall exactly where I sw the SEGA quote, but a few months after Warhammer 1 dropped, I remember seeing an interview with one of the devs saying that they where using the Warhammer series as a testbed for Empire 2 development. Their reasoning was that since the Warhammer map is similar to what they want the Empire map to look like, and the different races tests how well they could implement giving cultures and empires their own unique unit trees.
Empire Total War: You like Spiderman
Atilla: You like WWZ.
Ok, you got me.
...I like spiderman :(
Why does this make sense?
When you win a defensive siege against a full stack with just your garrison by careful use of heavy infantry, missile management, and that critical charge with your one unit of cav. 😎
Actually accurate. Shogun 2 fan, love how tight it is, and how almost every strategy is feasable.
Also, American of Japanese ancestory, so family history, I guess.
>shogun 2
>amazing optimization
*screams in the game only running on one core*
Rome 1 and Medieval 2 because I love copy paste units and op game mechanics. Paradox games have by far the best combat mechanics so I play them exclusively now
"What your favourite mod says about YOU?" next?
1. Rome 2/ Attila/ ToB - I love the feel of the games largely because of the immense historical accuracy and find the constant inaccuracies in R1 + M2 to be a bit of a mood killer. Attila is the best Total War hands-down, Rome 2 is not far behind it, and ToB should've been an Attila DLC with all its mechanics intact, but I love it anyway.
2. Empire/ Napoleon - I enjoy the grand scope of ETW and the absolutely stunning atmosphere of NTW. I play ETW non-stop with the "Imperial Destroyer" mod which makes it one of the best Total War games ever imo, and love NTW for both "Darthmod" and "The Great War" mod.
3. Three Kingdoms/ Troy - I'm apparently one of the only 3K players who near-solely plays records mode and super enjoys it. Troy is bronze age I love it too. Although my favourite faction in Troy is Sarpedon because it's the closest to a true Anatolian faction instead of some Greco-Trojan faction, my dislike of the lack of Middle Eastern factions doesn't keep me from enjoying the game, even if it's mostly GREEK! (Eastern factions = best factions in TW games)
I guess I'm in the minority because I genuinely think Rome 2, Attila, and Three Kingdoms are the best TW games to date. Empire's too buggy, Napoleon's too small, and Shogun 2 is great but imo feudal Japanese history is super boring.
Rome 2 with Divide Et Impera, I’m so sorry everyone
Right there with you, buddy.
If they give Medieval 3 the love and care they gave to Warhammer 2, it will definitely be worth the wait since Med 2. I hope it's the next game after Warhammer 3.
CA creates the game, Modders create the experience
Attila Fan: you thought Dark Souls should have been an strategy game.
I’m one of those freaks that love empire, because it’s got Poland as a developed faction (in medieval 2 it’s a boring campaign)
@Generic Name exactly it’s boring, factions like France have to keep fighting other major catholic factions and be unfairly treated by the pope while factions like Byzantine struggle to keep order when expanding because of faith, whole Poland just goes east and game done
@Generic Name fair fair
I actually liked Poland in Medieval 2, they get cool units and their campaign is so different to anybody elses. I guess I would get bored if I played any of Poland/Russia/Hungary/Denmark 2-3 times after each other (or more).
i played shogun 1 but im definitely not 50 ... that just hurt man
XD
I'm in denial too.
Europabarbarorum, Divide et Impera, and Ancient Empire fan over here!" ;)
*Total War Saga: Troy*
You grew up playing an old turn-based strategy game set in mycenaean Greece and are clinging to whichever games or mods can fulfill this niche of yours.
Attila = Masochism: The Game.
Western Roman Empire: You like to play 10 battles outnumbered 8 to 1 each turn
@@apc9714 WRE = You don't mind having to play a battle that you know you will lose with the only goal being to kill as many barbarians as possible before they inevitably move into Italy.
Got stuck with SS 6.4 and Roma Surectum 3, never moved on. Never got the feeling I miss out, until recently. Now I want to try Shogun 2
Do it
I'm a simple man, I see Total War, I hit like.
"Empire Total War: you love what it could have been, while violently hating what it ended up being"
All I wanted was a gunpowder-era Total War that wasn't buggy as hell (Empire) or painfully limited in scope (Napoleon).
At least we have Darthmod.
also:
"Thrones of Brittania: you either really like sieges or you've never heard of Medieval II Kingdoms"
You're so right
britannia is like a more polished attila with better mechanics, but a painfully limited scope
I really love Shogun 2 fall of the samurai with all the unit mods I added to the game. New artillery new infantry new everything. I am the same. I was looking for a main total war that was gunpowder based. My options were empire. Napoleon or one of the Shogun 2s.
I play Shogun 2 almost daily. Without the unit mods added I probably wouldn't.
Despite the terrible launch, Rome II has been by far my favorite title. I think the battle mechanics are smooth, the color palet is nicer than Attila (which I think is on purpose), the multiplayer community was always fun, and there is something about the scale some of the battles got that just stick out in my head. The later political system was also an upgrade, and I began to care more about characters finally. Napoleon with the Darthmod attached is a close second.
It's funny seeing the Rome remaster joke today.
Rome 2 is my favorite because of the DeI mod, it feels like the game I wanted it to be: complex, realistic, historical, difficult, vast and strategic!
Well... Napoleon Total War favorite here, and that was absolutely terrifyingly spot on. Are you.... stalking me?
I did linger on Napoleon Total War as I used to work on the Napoleonic Total War III modification, mainly beta testing our version of the campaign and making my version of the naval battles. Honestly, that game had great potential, but the Creative Assembly did screw up as I assume they outsourced parts of the game engine, hence why they never released proper modding tools for Empire, Napoleon or Shogun 2.
I would absolutely love for an Empire 2, though frankly, I have lost faith in CA, largely due to the flop of Rome 2 (I bought Rome 2 75% off, and I still felt I didn't get my money's worth out of it) and Warhammer became far too popular, leaving us historical fanboys in the dust. So, now I'm stuck playing Paradox games, but I still get that itch to command troops in the field.
even the new paradox games are lackluster
it's sad
Rome II as stress-free? I've played nearly every title that came before that game and I can honestly say I've never felt as stressed in a Total War game as I had playing Rome in Rome II.
Loved playing Pontus tho, until I lost the save file
Where's Legend's comment?
Also I am just a Rome 2 player because of Divide Et Impera, makes for a grindy campaign map and hard battles... because history i think???
Shogun 2: Or your name is Volound
description of napoleon players blew me away, youre a genius and read my mind
As a kid growing up my favorite was Rome Total War: Barbarian Invasion. Now as an adult my favorite is Attila Total War.
@Matsudo Ambition That’s actually an excellent way of looking at it, very astute observation.:)
Well now I am going to play barbarion invasion remastered
"Warhammer makes me hopeful" laughs in warhmmaer 3
shogun 2: why the hell our ashigaru and samurai have to climb the castle wall by their hands?
Rome 1 and Attila of course
I can’t say I have a favorite. Empire was my first game, I loved the time period, the way they had such a wide variety of cultures and units and stuff, all the different strategies and tactics you could come up with. The map is also grand, the way research works is much more similar to Civilization which is what I was used to. I also enjoy the system of having smaller villages and towns that you could develop any way you needed to get the most out of each settlement. It’s the only Total War game where I’ve been able to conquer the entire world, which I then allowed to rebel to create a fun new map. The Native American expansion was a fun new challenge as I had to unite the tribes to the best of my abilities and completely change the way I fought the advanced European style armies. I haven’t played Rome very extensively, but I did like the setting and I have fond memories of playing a sort of hotseat campaign with friends and shouting “For the glory of Rome!” Every five minutes. Medieval was always great, it was almost like a roleplaying experience for me, and with so many playable factions there’s a lot of fun to be had. I’ll never forget the epic battles in the base game and the Kingdoms expansion, though I’ll never forgive my friend for always playing as Milan in multiplayer battles. (:P) I’d need to put more time into Britannia to get the full experience, but so far I love the time period, the art style, and the politics. I also can’t say I’ve fully experienced Warhammer Total War either as I’ve pretty much only played the Empire and the Dwarves, but my favorite part of that game is learning the other factions’ strengths and weaknesses and developing strategies for each of them-though I abhor how strong the lords and heroes are, it feels like you can’t counter them without a hero of your own, and in moments where my unlucky garrison gets torn to pieces I remember how the actual Warhammer fantasy expected you to attach a commander to a unit rather than send them out solo.
Napoleon is pure Genius tho.. Go buy Napoleon TW, play the Campaign of the Coallition as Prussia, Russia, England, France ... play Online. Then go watch the movie WATERLO 1970 ... I promise you will cry when he says his last goodyby eto the OLD GUARD.. The Music, the formations, the love for Patria . My first Total War was EMPIRE then Shogun and then ROME 2 and Medevil 2 but once I got Napoleon.. it was PERFECTION!
*Wapath campgin is lowkey underated.
ua-cam.com/video/h5bW-YXZvOU/v-deo.html
@@robroux5059 I’ll have to give it a shot! In the meantime consider Medieval 2: Kingdoms, it holds up well after all these years and comes with a lot of content for the price it’s sold at now.
@@gibiuswrecks5215 Oh yea.. put up some hours on the Americas campaign as the Aztecs/Apache, and huge fan of the Rus vs Golden Horde era, The irish campaign against england is interesting.
I think i got all Medevil 2 for like $10 in 2015. Great game, expansive, the OST(amazing). But not a fan of those dam Crusades.
But once I picked up NPTW in 2016 for like $10 ..it was magic.
Man, all CA has to do is combine EMPIRE MAP,Factions , Economic system and just use Napoleons mechanics and it would be the perfect game. ..Plus add the Americas like the Iriqouis ( Tecumseh) and uff.
@@robroux5059 Crusades are annoying. The real first crusade was a coalition of empires, and they conquered multiple cities and stuff. These crusades feel more like a race between the different nations to take the target city, and the reward iiiiiis...nothing worthwhile. You either have to struggle to hold a city of a different religion that’s really far from your capital, or let it fall. Even if it wins you favor with the Pope, it inevitably goes down just from defending yourself from your enemies and some other country with more churches wins his love. What’s worse is when you get your crusade army together, join the crusade, sail off...and then the next turn half your force somehow “deserts” in the middle of the Mediterranean. Supposedly they think you’re too slow in getting to the Holy Land, but what’s their plan for a faster route? Swimming?
Those for rome and medieval 2 are accurate to me
I tend to play rome 2 to this day specifically for the feeling of empire building personally, Also i like the broader scope of playable factions compared to rome 1 and medieval 2 even if it is just glorified alternate start positions
Try the belum imperium mod for rome 1
@@whatsittoya4590 try the improved testudo mod for Rome 2.
It’s between med 2 and Rome 1 for me
Attila might be my favorite, if I could run it smoothly at huge unit scale. I'm a simple man, if I can't play the game at huge unit scale it isn't worth my time.
I love the doom and gloom atmosphere. The faint glimmers of hope in the sea of barbarians and traitors. Every victory vital. The desperate campaign management as well was stellar.
I agree 100%
Honestly I'd say 3k's fans, being one myself, are more enamoured by the fantastic campaign map gameplay than the duels or specific setting. I like the setting, though I wasn't interested when it was first announced, but I wouldn't say that's why it's my favourite Total War game (having finally been the game to dethrone Medieval 2, which was my first and favourite for a long time).
By the way I know this video isn't meant to be taken seriously, I just thought I'd throw this out since lots of people don't seem to get the appeal of 3k.
Agreed, i believe the best campaign experience of all TW's is 3K. There are things i hate (like the recruitment system) but it still is the best for me due to it's diplomacy. I only play records btw.
You called Rome Remastered
I am Attila TW guy, you are 100% right about us. I am personally obsessed with history and i love constant pressure and hard situations, trying to handle them as much as i can. Attila offers us something different, Attila offers us something weird, Attila have the best mods. Attila is painful, but it's the most pleasurable TW experience at same time. Maybe we are just masochists, who knows.
I came onboard at the beginning with Shogun 1. I have followed, since. My favs are Rome 1, Medieval 2, and Empire. Your opinions of fans of those games match me pretty damn close.
Medieval 2, jesus you read me like a book
An episode in which Melkor wasn't sarcastic and gave an analysis in a factual tone ? Finally !
except for troy, but it's troy so
I'm one of those old men in their 50's, but Warhammer 2 is my favourite of the series (with Attila a close second) even though the sieges are crap so up your bum bum and... and... well, hmm... I'll remember the other stuff tomorrow so just you watch out for that comment!
Empire gets a bad reputation, I like it more that medieval 2 because it is cleaner. I deal with more bugs in Rome and medieval 2, while not being as small as Napoleon and more unique factions than shogun 2 and newer
Three Kingdoms: You've played A LOT of Kou Shibusawa games and this finally convinced you to give PC gaming a try.
Not that I'm speaking from experience or anything.
Loved Napoleon, now I own almost every (latest) edition of the paradox games... ya so... scary accurate...
Well you’re right about me being stubborn
Literally described me with Medieval 2. Even though I haven't played it after release of Warhammer 2. Just playing that on occasion now, in hopes for amazing historical title again :D
I can tell you about my favorite Total War game, but my favourate Total War game has been a matter of mystiry and speculaition since anceint times.
Shogun 2-FOTS: you like to massacre sword wielders with your very advanced gunners and machine guns.
4:37 "You get pleasure out of weird stuff" pretty accurate ngl
I thought you were going dirty when talking about Attila LOL
"...but chances are, you have mostly moved over to Paradox" ... hello it's me! :D
Empire Total War: Land battles suck but man those naval battles are tight.
Med2 and Rome2. Yes I fell down the stairs as a child how did you know?
I like Empire and thrones of Brittannia...........
Need I say more?
To me Rome 2 marked the end point of golden era of Total War games
Goddamit you got me 100% portrayed with the Medieval 2 and Napoleon Total War, I feel so exposed :D
That rome 1 remastered meme aged like a fine wine.
Is this the new BuzzFeed but all about the total war franchise?
This is Scary how accurate this is.(I like Rome 2 and Med 2)
I'd place Medieval 2: Total War Kingdoms in first place if it weren't for the absence of anything reminiscent of Medieval: Total War Viking Invasion, so instead I have to give it to Rome: Total War.
i love attila because it has the most op faction ever- the venedi
People who started playing Shogun 1 when they were 8 years old are now 50, let that sink in
It released in 2000, so they would only be around 30 XD But still, pretty old
My favorite is medieval 2 and it’s kinda accurate ngl
I remember the first time i saw medieval total war in a pc club , i watched for 30 min went out to buy some popcorn and when i returned back offered to the player and asked him to explain the game for me .
Love this channel
I actually laughed out loud when I saw how choppy the Atilla clip was
Also, you hit the nail on the head with Shogun 2/Three Kingdoms.
I personally don't really have a favorite total war game; but, I do have to say that I really like the trading system in total war troy.
Attila: You can be either a hipster or a masochist but in most cases you’re both. If you haven’t had barbarians sack your city while your kingdom is in constant danger of plunging into civil war, can you really call yourself a total war player?
I love shogun 1 and medieval 1, actually I'm a M1TW modder, but my favourite is Medieval II with TATW...
For me, it changes from
Medieval II
Empire
And Rome II
Depending on my mood I would say one is my favorite over the others and is heavily influenced by the setting.
Some times I jus want some medieval action and go crusading for a while.
Or maybe I want to rolplay as the polish trying to survive during the 18th century
¿Expand the frontiers of Rome? ¿Reclaim the old empire of Alexander? Uh, yes please!
You hit the napoleon guess on the head
I just like shogun 2 for the siege battles, Japanese castles are neat as hell
My favorites are both expansions, the shogun 2 fall of the samurai and the attila charlemagne age
1 second of 10 minuets (melkors brain noooooooooooooooooooo)