Do you realise what you've done man! I gave up film in the 1990s and was happy up with my digital gear. Then I found your UA-cam channel and was reminded of all the gear I'd owned in the 1970s. Long story short, I've bought 14 film cameras and 20 lenses in the last year or so and I'm finding it difficult to stop.... My wife frowns when she catches me watching your channel and knows there will be another parcel arriving soon :-). As far as Olympus goes, I have the OM1n, OM2n and OM10 plus 50mm f/1.4, 28mm f/2.8 and 135mm f/3.5, with the 50mm f/1.4 being my favourite. I do shoot film but also adapt most of the lenses to my Canon R6 as well. Best eBay auction bargain - FED 5 with Industar 61 & case for £28!
What a nice collection and all in very good shape! I used the 3.5 macro in the 1990s for product documentation and now with MFT adapter for all purpose, from 1:1 macro to infinity. This works well due to the floating element construction.
I have just bought my first Zuiko 50mm f1.8 silver nose. I now have a number of 50(ish) mm lenses and the OM Zuiko is just beautiful to use. The focus ring is incredible to use, and the clarity of images is great. I'm really enjoying it. I really enjoy your videos and photos, great stuff.
Your love for the subject shines through. I have two OM-1’s, a chrome and a black. Both have a 50 1.8 and I also have a 135 Zuiko. I’ve had them since they were new. I was working as a news photographer when they came out and I love a small camera body and they were my first new camera purchases. Not sure how I ended up with two 50 1.8 lenses though. I had a wide at one time but that one is lost to time. Still shooting digital for clients but starting to play with film again and my treasured OM-1’s.
Loved this video so much. I have a late model black nose 50 1.4 Mc and absolutely love it it’s my favorite lens of all time. Very interesting comparison!
I really like your calm and balanced presentation style. I’ve have followed you for some years now and I am enjoying most of your output. Blessings from Denmark. ❤❤❤
Great video. So thorough and well delivered as always. I have the 1.4 for my OM2 - it’s great to have that aperture in a small package. Especially today with so few high speed films around - I find myself using it a lot. I’m tempted by the 55mm 1.2 - it’s a great looking character lens but I’m out off by the thoriated glass. I believe some were made without it, that said, but will probably just end up sticking with the 1.4.
I recently picked up a 50mm f1.2 Zuiko for $60 Canadian Dollars!!! One of my best finds! It’s amazing! I attach it to my Om1 and fujfilm xt3!! My dream lens!
Une nouvelle superbe vidéo pour les amoureux des objectifs vintages , olympus zuiko une référence en terme de qualité optique et mécanique.thank you for this very nice review.
I really like Olympus primes too :) I have the 28mm f3.5, 50mm f1.8, 50mm Macro f3.5, 200mm f4, and soon I will have a 300mm f4.5. Super excited to get the 300mm :) I am going to be using it for astro photography. Every lense I have came with fungus, but I learn how to clean them and now their all perfect again.
For me the F3.5 really stands out due to its fantastic micro-contrast, impressive colors and pack-leading sharpness. Even boring subjects are coming to live in an often unexpected manner. It is very sad that the Olympus photography business didn't make it successfully enough in the digital era so that it had to be sold. A true loss.
I wonder how the camera division of Olympus is going to adjust now. I think OM-SYSTEM will keep a standard quality relativity high just as the ThinkPad gave done after IBM sold the license to the Chinese producer Lenovo
I lucked out hardcore; my girlfriend was gifted an old OM4 from a the wife of a former professional photographer. Came with a 50mm f1.4 and a 28mm f2.8, in AMAZING shape. His OM4 seems to have had some modifications done to the internals to fix the battery drain issue that a lot of users reported with the camera. Great video!! Loved all the info!
Hi Nigel. Thx a lot for this passionated video ! I do love this format taking a line of lenses of the same brand to explain and show the differences. And you don t only speak but show a lot of images examples and this is great. Big thx for this. If you could do the same for other brands Nikon, canon, Minolta, Pentax… it would be great.
preface: wonderful overview and I liked the sample images a lot! so the comment about not having a pro-line is _mostly_ true, but the super telephotos did in fact kind of stand apart in the literature. the 180/2, 250/2 and 350/2.8 all had several special designs, and more than anything a completely separate aesthetic design and as far as I can tell a special order status. Real special lenses, they look like Canon lenses! Re 50s, I've owned them all, multiple examples of most, including the 55. The 1.8 and 1.4 are not my favorites, the 55/1.2 is good, 50/1.2 is fantastic, but the two macros are the best IMO. Oh small note, the 50/2.0 is bigger than the 55/1.2. the 50mm f2.0 auto-macro is in my pantheon with the Leica Summilux 50/1.4 ASPH and Pentax 67 105mm f2.4 Takumar. And of course, the 2.0 macro at 90mm from the OM series. The 50 and the 90 were the undisputed kings of their class (so, non-specialty macros) until the Zeiss makro-planars IMO. Though the OM 50/2.0 is tiny in comparison to the Zeiss (which I own on F mount) and nicer in its rendering to my personal taste.
A 55mm f1.2 is best for both eyes open photography (eye to the camera and eye outside the camera both open at the same time). You see the world with essentially the same magnification on an OM1 or OM2 through both eyes and with a brighter image (ok, same with the 50mm f1.2) than the other 50mm lenses. OM1 & OM2 have a viewfinder magnification of 0.92. (1 - (0.92 * 50)/50)100% = -8.0% (1 - (0.92 * 55)/50)100% = +1.2% OM2s has a viewfinder magnification of 0.86. (1 - (0.86 * 50)/50)100% = -14.0% (1 - (0.86 * 55)/50)100% = -5.4% OM3 & OM4 have a viewfinder magnification of 0.84. (1 - (0.84 * 50)/50)100% = -16.0% (1 - (0.84 * 55)/50)100% = -7.6% A brighter screen can decrease the maybe two stop loss in image brightness, lens vs reality, on OM1s and OM2s at the expense of introducing a metering difference off the screen. Get a brighter 2-13 screen from an OM3 or OM4 or find a Beattie screen and install that in place of the original viewfinder screen. Note that for the 2-13 you would have to shave off some of the screen's grab-tab to install it as it will otherwise not fit in the screen's frame. Think that other manufacturers made their fastest glass as 55mm or 58mm partially for this reason, to better allow both eyes open photography, a nice-to-have about which few noticed or cared. Thinking too that between wanting to put data outside the screen and Nikon touting eyepoint advantages especially for eyeglass wearers with their F3hp the whole idea (not popular in the first place) lost its luster in favor of lower viewfinder magnifications and heading back to 50mm for fast glass. If something is wrong then please correct me. What am I saying...this is the internet of course someone will correct me.
So many lenses to choose from! I just realised this morning that you have been filming Zenography for 6 years! I wonder how many lenses have passed through your hands in that time, and how many actually got the "Zenography Seal of Approval"? Another great video and more lenses to think about. Thank you.
Quite a few have passed through my hands, no doubt about that! As for the seal of approval, well, quite a lot of them, to be honest - each has a different character, and I've found very few outright bad ones! Glad you're still enjoying the videos!
In large part due to this channel I am very much enjoy using my growing collection of vintage lenses, most of them Olympus lenses. It has come to the point where if a camera manufacturer came out with a full frame mirrorless camera without auto focus I would probably buy it. Lol unlikely to happen I suppose. I enjoy doing my own focusing and I find it easier to manually focus a vintage lens than a modern digital lens.
Next up, the 50mm f2 macro and the 40mm f2 pancake? Really enjoyed the comparison and I think it's nice that you got another copy of the 55mm and reviewed it again. Same thing happened when I picked up the newest version of the 1.4 lens. The silver nose version was much softer and not as well behaved. Ever since I got the f2 macro it sits on the shelf though.
The 1.8 is a corker. I just got one on an OM20 body and am getting an adapter to go on my new (i.e. old) Sony A7 body. Very portable and stopped down just one stop it gives lovely colour and centre sharpness with that old-school Olympus nostalgic character. I'll be getting some more Olympus lenses..
Really enjoying your comparisons, as I delve into my growing collection of legacy glass. It would help all viewers immensely if you had TC markers for each of the lenses you mention. 👍
Had a 50mm f1.4 on my OM4 back when I shot a lot of Kodachrome 24 and 64 for picture library stock. Competent performer, sharp with good contrast, but not quite in the same league as Zeiss 50mm offerings for Rollei and Contax cameras that I subsequently moved to.
I have three copies of the 55 1.2 & two copies of the 50 1.2 Personally, I prefer the 55, for its greater character. The 50 has smoother, creamier out of focus areas. The differences are not huge, but are there. So it does depend upon what an individual values in the rendering, I just happen to like the more unusual effects some lenses give.
I have the 1.4, but I use it as a video lens for filming with a digital camera. It is simply amazing. I think I need to pay 10x more to get a better video lens. The color and smoothness are natural and magical.
I just bought the Olympus 55mm f1.2 and it is the most radioactive lens I have so far at 3385 CPM, SN 117492. However, I read and then tested that Plexiglass blocks Alpha particles. I tried 1 inch of the stuff and it knocked 3385 coming off the front lens, down to 540 CPM. The 55 is very sharp, IF you can find the in-focus area. You will need a well controlled environment and a tripod. Plastic is easy to handle. This is in no way a snapshot lens. I will be using a tripod most of the time. At f1.2 it is a job to find the "In Focus" area of the subject. This is what makes any f1.2 lens a fun challenge to use. I found it is best to use a fast shutter speed with a high ASA setting. At this point I like both the Olympus OM-System G.Zuiko Auto-S 55mm f1.2 1974 Radioactive 3389 CPM, but I like the Canon FL 55mm f1.2 Fluorite Lens 1968 color better at this point. Jim
I guess you must have an earlier version of the lens - as I understand it, the thoriated elements were changed for non-thoriated ones around serial number 136000 or so? Later ones, I've learned, have a yellow coating that looks like radioactive yellowing, but isn't. I think that's right anyway!
8:00 The Zuiko 50mm f/1.8 has one difference from the others. A plastic aperture ring! The numbers are more deeply engraved in it so I wouldn't complain. I had never felt such a quality sense on a lens before I got one new with a little OM-10, which was cheap and had a near silent shutter. I wish I still had it.
Does the 55mm lens have intermediate aperture click like f1.4 or f1.7 between f1.2 and f2.0? Contemplating to buy a 55mm thoriated version. Thanks for your informative videos💐
Just getting into the Zuiko lenses and this was an enjoyable watch thank you. I found myself wondering what make of watch you are wearing in this video. Looks like an Omega.
Olympus is my favorite. My collection at this point is: Olympus OM-System G.Zuiko Auto-S 55mm f1.2 1974 Radioactive 3389 CPM (BEST f1.2 ever) Olympus OM-System Zuiko MC Auto-S 50mm f1.4 Black Nose Radioactive 460 CPM (also Great) Olympus OM-System H.Zuiko Auto-W 24mm f2.8 MF However, it is winter and that is when I buy lenses.
Several years ago I used to go to all the charity stores thrift shops whatever you want to call them in my town in the Pacific Northwest with my wife to search for old cameras and lenses all the time. While visiting one of the shops one day there were several cameras and some lenses in the case so I asked to look at those. Among the group there of mostly 10 or $20 cameras and lenses there were two Olympus lenses. Both 50mm in near mint condition one was the kit lens 50mm 1.8 and the other was 50mm 1.2 and the price on each of those was $15. As you might imagine I got pretty excited. I knew the 1.2 lens was very valuable but I really didn't have any idea I just thought wow that's an awful good deal. When I got home I did a search to find what they were selling for and I was pretty shocked. So i cleaned it up a little put an adapter on my Canon DSLR did some test shots put it on eBay and resold it. I had about 300 or so cameras and lenses at the time so it had to go. In all my years of vintage camera equipment hunting it was one of my greatest finds. So this was a few years back so it sold for a little less than the price that you mentioned in your video. Thank you so much for sharing these reviews of these old lenses I really enjoy them.
I don't have any Vintage OM lenses for my E-M1 mk ii. Yet ......... I do have 2 on their way to me though : Zuiko Auto-T 75-150mm f4.0 & Zuiko Auto-T 300mm f4.5. So now you can guarantee it will be persisting down for a couple of weeks 🌧.
I don't know is there more versions of Zuiko 50mm f1,4 (other than silver nose version), but mine (black nose) is slightly soft wide open. So soft that my 50mm f1,8 is much sharper at f1,8. However, as expected, stopped down to f2 increases sharpness dramatically...
The zuiko 1.4 is a bit soft wide open, but to my eyes entirely useable, and although the silver nose can lose contrast I love its colours and character.
On the 50/1.8, I remember the multicoated version marked "made in Japan" (with that capitalization) was claimed by some Zuiko lovers to be the best. It's the only version I have and I can't compare it with others, so I really can't say through experience, but it might be worth looking for that specifically if you want one. It's one of the best 50s I've ever used (if not quite as good as the 50/3.5).
Recently got a similar 50/1.8 MIJ in a good condition, obviously one of the later versions (the serial number is >5 mil). I use with a speedbooster which turns it into a 70 mm equivalent. Like other OM Zuikos, the 50 feels very well made and looks lovely on my E-M1. I've never had other legacy 50s, but this one definitely requires a more thoughtful approach compared to modern m4/3 lenses or even its OM Zuiko 100/2.8 counterpart which I also own. Up close, centre sharpness is pretty good wide open but it's better to stop down to at least f2.8 with off-centre subjects. Bokeh is nice and smooth at close range but gets progressively worse with more and more outlining as the focus distance increases. Sharpness also deteriorates with distance so I'd rather stop down to at least f5.6 or even f8 for landscape shots. Flare resistance is okay and axial CAs not very prominent for a legacy lens. Anyway, the 50/1.8 is definitely not the kind of lens I'd use for "run and gun" photography, but I'm pretty certain it can deliver the goodies if used to its strengths.
Another stunning review comparison. I have been very pleased with the Om Zuiko lenses I have used with the exception being the chrome nose 50mm f1.4. Its a bit too soft and low contrast wide open for my liking. The Canon FD 50mm 1.4 is quite a bit nicer to my eyes.
@@zenography7923 Thanks for the reply and info. I have only used the MC Rokkor-PF 55mm f1.7. I really like the way that lens makes B&W. A lot of silver in the images.
Really enjoyed that overview, thank you! I just purchased and OM-1n with a 50 f/1.8 a few months back and am nearing the end of my first roll. Out of curiosity, what watch are you wearing in this video?
@@zenography7923 I was very fortunate to procure one from KEH here in the US in 2016 for just $345. They were having a 20% off sale on all film camera lenses, and this example had been engraved by a previous owner, resulting in further discount. I can share a few sample photos, if you are interested.
You missed the 50mm f/2 macro! It's from the same cohort of exotic late Zuikos as the the "exquisitely engineered" 100mm f/2, as you called it. As such, I will likely never own one myself, but I'd love to get a close look at one from your perspective as a fellow Zuiko fan.
I used the 1,8 for a long time and was perfectly happy. Than I somehow got the 1,4 (attached to an OM-2 or OM-1) and had high hopes. To be honest, the difference is minimal up to not being there at all. The Pancolar is more contrasty, almost too contrasty and saturated. Is that a Doxa watch you are wearing?
@@zenography7923 Nice! Personally would love to purchase a vintage (pre-Swatch) Longines or Omega, great history from both brands. My dad used to own a vintage Longines Admiral 5 Star that he regretted selling
Hi. Only the first versions of the 55mm f/1.2 (those with the silver filter ring) had thoriated lenses. Later version of this lens (black filter ring) don't (I measured mine and tests negative).
@@zenography7923 I have some other lenses (different brands) which seem to have the typical yellowish tint of glass with thorium, but they are not radioactive. Looking at them from different angles, the colour does not seem to be generated by the coating. but it looks like it is coming from the entire mass of the glass. I am a little bit afraid of experimenting ways to "remove" this tint, because in the end I like the way colours are rendered. Even if the hue was caused by some kind of modification of the internal glass structure (reversible or not), the resulting effect seems to have added a pleasant and interesting feature to the characteristics of the lens - isn't that what we are looking for when buying these lenses?
I have the 50mm 1.4 that I use with a Canon camera. It is soft at times but can be sharper if stopped down. It does have great bokeh wide open. However I shoot macro and feel this isn’t quite the lens for me yet. It has advantages that the Canon 100mm doesn’t have but I tend to use the Canon lens most of the time. I’m not thinking of moving away from Canon and Olympus is an option but I’m not quite ready to buy the Olympus 90mm yet. Which one of these would you recommend instead? And are they all manual only even with an Olympus camera? Thanks
All the OM Zuiko lenses (that's those made for Olympus film cameras, as featured here) were manual focus only. In the days of the OM cameras autofocus hadn't arrived on the SLR scene. I think on the Canon 5D cameras you can change the focussing screen for one with a manual focus prism built in (like those that used to be used in manual focus SLRs), so focussing should be pretty easy with one of these.
To my opinion, the Olympus film cameras' problem is their mount tirage meaning that you can only use Leica R, dunno-which-other-one and Zuiko lenses on it without loosing infinity. This makes them less attractive in choosing a lens. I have a Canon AE1-Program and a OM-1n bodies that both work great but no lenses to mount on top, yet. I'm more interested in keeping the Canon since I can mount more lenses on it. What do you think?
It depends what you want to do. You can certainly adapt more lenses to the Canon mount, but I'm more than happy with my Olympus lenses and cameras, and don't really want to mount any other lenses on them.
Hi! Quick question: do you store your lenses with their diaphragm closed (f16 or above) or wide open? I can't seem to close the diaphragm on the Olympus 50mm I just bought and I don't see any manual/auto function or safety pin. Thank you
I own about 20 OM Zuiko lenses and when taken from the camera, the diaphragm of the lens will be wide open. There must me a spring in the lens to do this. So wide open is better I presume.
No adapters exist readily for sale, because the OM lens system had a longer flange distance (rear element to sensor/film) than nearly all other SLR systems. What that means is, if you mount a Takumar or M42 lens on an Olympus, you physically won’t be able to focus at infinity, or even a bit off infinity. For that reason no one commercially makes those adapters - as far as I’m aware - even if you only wanted to use the lens for close targets. It is perhaps the biggest disadvantage of the OM system.
I have a f1.8 version on my OM-1. When viewing through the view finder however there seems to be vignetting. Granted this lens was very inexpensive and not purchased through a dealer. Any ideas? Thanks.
It's difficult to say exactly, although it sounds like something needs a clean - the 1.8 does have a little vignetting but it's not strong enough to see through the vf, unless you're really looking for it. Does the vignetting show at all aperture values, or just wide open?
A very interesting video as always. For many years the silver nose 50/1.4 was my only lens on my OM-1 during Uni and after. To be honest, my copy wasn't very good, and I eventually got fed up with repairs on my various Olympus equipment.
lenses can have faults. Mid eighties, I tipped up my cash to buy a Zuiko 24 shift - it took six weeks to be delivered. I took it home and ran a roll of film thro, dev'd & printed - there was a soft spot size of a 10p piece! The lens got swapped in three days. Why six weeks to deliver and three days to swap? Grump. That Zuiko 24 is still in my bag, converted to nikon f.
@@zenography7923 I now have 4 (yes, four) shift lenses. 24mm is how I see the world. (Conditioned by some 50yrs in architecture.) The Zuiko is the most user friendly in terms of functionality - shifting X & Y (remember to press the stop down button!) on mere finger pressure. With a gridded screen, many, many hundreds of images made hand-held. (Only grump is the inbuilt filter ring - easy to turn unintentionaly.) 24mm is my 'normal' view of the street, 15mm is my wide angle & that too is a shift. (Laowa)
Objective view (!). Folks forget that lenses form a circular image. Schneider etc. always declared the coverage (circle) for each lens. The diagonal of the 35mm frame is about 43.25mm, ergo image circle has to be ~that diam.. The Laowa shifts about 11mm each way (according to autocad), that is an image circle of about 74mm diam.. Subjective user review available & images available.
@@zenography7923 thanks for the fast reply mate! Do you have a video where we could see photos made with these (or a few of these) lenses but with the OM2?
Olympus 50mm 1.8 Zuiko MC Auto-S Lens question. In the US most lens just say Japan but your lens says Made in Japan. Is there an acutal difference in the lenses or does it just depend on where it was sold? Thanks!!
@@zenography7923 I think you would like it! Its a blur and bokeh machine!!! Thx for answer!!!! BTW I ordred 2 lenses according to you videos! The Helios 44-2 and the Helios 44-3!
I was doing fine untill you flashed the front element of that beautiful 55 1.2. I'm a big fan of "slow" vintage macro lenses. A nikkor 55 3.5 lives on my Fuji
Thank you very much . Around 40 years ago , I bought used Olympus . OM 1 + 50mm f.1.8 8,000 Yen. OM 1 New + 50mm f.1.4 15,000 Yen . OM 28mm f.3.5 6,000 Yen . OM 135mm f.3.5 3,000 Yen . OM 100mm f.2 15,000 Yen. OM 50mm f.1.8 is superb . But 50mm f.1.8 and 135mm f.3.5 , I couldn’t find them in my room . But those must be existing . I love those film loading type cameras . But I couldn’t buy films for them anymore . Simply , from my monetary reason . I have been deeply sorry to them . I love Olympus blue , and red , of them colors . Apr. 10th 2024 Wed. 07:21 am from Yokohama City Japan
The OM 40 which is plastic fantastic... they put 2 layers of paint on top plate a sort of bronze one then black over that to mimic brassing eventually... these are pricey for what they are too methinks.....
There are many I like, but my everyday favourites are the Carl Zeiss Jena 50mm f1.8 pancolar, the olympus zuiko 50mm f1.8 (final version, serial number over 1,000,000), and the Pentax 55mm f1.8. If money were no object though I'd get an Olympus Zuiko 50mm f1.2 - an outstanding optic.
Жаль это слышать - обычно это действительно хороший объектив. Может у тебя ошибка? Sorry to hear that - it's usually a really nice lens. Perhaps yours has a fault?
No pro line...because they were ALL pro lenses. You can't beat them. I absolutely love your content. Thank you so much
Very glad you enjoyed it, many thanks!
But they came attached to the two digit bodyies too. The 1,8 was on them.
Do you realise what you've done man! I gave up film in the 1990s and was happy up with my digital gear. Then I found your UA-cam channel and was reminded of all the gear I'd owned in the 1970s. Long story short, I've bought 14 film cameras and 20 lenses in the last year or so and I'm finding it difficult to stop.... My wife frowns when she catches me watching your channel and knows there will be another parcel arriving soon :-). As far as Olympus goes, I have the OM1n, OM2n and OM10 plus 50mm f/1.4, 28mm f/2.8 and 135mm f/3.5, with the 50mm f/1.4 being my favourite. I do shoot film but also adapt most of the lenses to my Canon R6 as well. Best eBay auction bargain - FED 5 with Industar 61 & case for £28!
That frown sounds familiar! Storage space never used to be an issue, but now...
It sounds like you have a bad case of GAS (gear acquisition syndrome) there - you need treatment, quickly! Or some more cameras...
@@zenography7923 ordered 5 new lenses this week! (seriously!)
Here's the trick: Buy it, try it.. If you don't love it, sell it... Repeat...
Yeah, don't forget to sell it, even if you don't need money ))
Wow what a comprehensive review, so chilled and laid back. Brilliant.
Glad you enjoyed it, thanks!
I love the Olymus Zuiko lenses and have 10 of them I enjoy using
They're fantastic - it sounds like you have a nice collection there too!
I'm hoping to build my collection too as I am a Zuiko fan as well! Only have 5 though😥
@@zenography7923 Yes I have a nice collection. They are great lenses
The images you have shown from that 55mm f1.2 Zuiko lens look magical, so special in colour and feel.
Thanks, glad you liked them!
What a nice collection and all in very good shape! I used the 3.5 macro in the 1990s for product documentation and now with MFT adapter for all purpose, from 1:1 macro to infinity. This works well due to the floating element construction.
Indeed it does - one of my favourite zuikos and recently, one of my most used 50s!
I use the 50/3.5 on an OMD EM10ii and a Fotodiox adapter. The old Zuiko lenses are great on the OMDs. Almost like they were dexigned for them.
I have just bought my first Zuiko 50mm f1.8 silver nose. I now have a number of 50(ish) mm lenses and the OM Zuiko is just beautiful to use. The focus ring is incredible to use, and the clarity of images is great. I'm really enjoying it. I really enjoy your videos and photos, great stuff.
Your love for the subject shines through. I have two OM-1’s, a chrome and a black. Both have a 50 1.8 and I also have a 135 Zuiko. I’ve had them since they were new. I was working as a news photographer when they came out and I love a small camera body and they were my first new camera purchases. Not sure how I ended up with two 50 1.8 lenses though. I had a wide at one time but that one is lost to time. Still shooting digital for clients but starting to play with film again and my treasured OM-1’s.
Damn. Gotta get me one of those sweet 50mm from Olympus. Thanks you for yet another informational entertaining video, man. Keep going!
Thanks Miguel, I will! Glad you enjoyed it.
you have such a soothing voice, you should do audio book readings. Lovely analysis!
Loved this video so much. I have a late model black nose 50 1.4 Mc and absolutely love it it’s my favorite lens of all time. Very interesting comparison!
It's a superb lens - enjoy!
The Olympus 50mm f1.8 is really something. Your are on spot with your analysis - it is as sharp and colourfull as the lens itself :-)
I really like your calm and balanced presentation style. I’ve have followed you for some years now and I am enjoying most of your output. Blessings from Denmark. ❤❤❤
Great video. So thorough and well delivered as always. I have the 1.4 for my OM2 - it’s great to have that aperture in a small package. Especially today with so few high speed films around - I find myself using it a lot. I’m tempted by the 55mm 1.2 - it’s a great looking character lens but I’m out off by the thoriated glass. I believe some were made without it, that said, but will probably just end up sticking with the 1.4.
It seems I've made a mistake about thoriated glass in this lens - I'm told the silver nose lens has it, but not the black nose version.
5 beauties in the olympus with a cup of tea included! Grettings!
Hi Gustavo, glad you enjoyed it!
I recently picked up a 50mm f1.2 Zuiko for $60 Canadian Dollars!!! One of my best finds! It’s amazing! I attach it to my Om1 and fujfilm xt3!! My dream lens!
Now that must be the bargain of the century! Well done!
I was happy picking up a mint copy for 400 AUD… 60 CAD is an absolute steal!
Une nouvelle superbe vidéo pour les amoureux des objectifs vintages , olympus zuiko une référence en terme de qualité optique et mécanique.thank you for this very nice review.
Je suis très heureux que vous ayez apprécié, merci beaucoup!
I really like Olympus primes too :) I have the 28mm f3.5, 50mm f1.8, 50mm Macro f3.5, 200mm f4, and soon I will have a 300mm f4.5. Super excited to get the 300mm :) I am going to be using it for astro photography. Every lense I have came with fungus, but I learn how to clean them and now their all perfect again.
For me the F3.5 really stands out due to its fantastic micro-contrast, impressive colors and pack-leading sharpness. Even boring subjects are coming to live in an often unexpected manner. It is very sad that the Olympus photography business didn't make it successfully enough in the digital era so that it had to be sold. A true loss.
True, it's a shame - but we still have all these wonderful old lenses to play with!
I wonder how the camera division of Olympus is going to adjust now. I think OM-SYSTEM will keep a standard quality relativity high just as the ThinkPad gave done after IBM sold the license to the Chinese producer Lenovo
I lucked out hardcore; my girlfriend was gifted an old OM4 from a the wife of a former professional photographer. Came with a 50mm f1.4 and a 28mm f2.8, in AMAZING shape.
His OM4 seems to have had some modifications done to the internals to fix the battery drain issue that a lot of users reported with the camera. Great video!! Loved all the info!
Very glad you enjoyed it - enjoy that OM4!
Great review…well done.
Incredibly thorough
Thanks!
Hi Nigel. Thx a lot for this passionated video ! I do love this format taking a line of lenses of the same brand to explain and show the differences. And you don t only speak but show a lot of images examples and this is great. Big thx for this. If you could do the same for other brands Nikon, canon, Minolta, Pentax… it would be great.
preface: wonderful overview and I liked the sample images a lot!
so the comment about not having a pro-line is _mostly_ true, but the super telephotos did in fact kind of stand apart in the literature. the 180/2, 250/2 and 350/2.8 all had several special designs, and more than anything a completely separate aesthetic design and as far as I can tell a special order status. Real special lenses, they look like Canon lenses! Re 50s, I've owned them all, multiple examples of most, including the 55. The 1.8 and 1.4 are not my favorites, the 55/1.2 is good, 50/1.2 is fantastic, but the two macros are the best IMO. Oh small note, the 50/2.0 is bigger than the 55/1.2. the 50mm f2.0 auto-macro is in my pantheon with the Leica Summilux 50/1.4 ASPH and Pentax 67 105mm f2.4 Takumar. And of course, the 2.0 macro at 90mm from the OM series. The 50 and the 90 were the undisputed kings of their class (so, non-specialty macros) until the Zeiss makro-planars IMO. Though the OM 50/2.0 is tiny in comparison to the Zeiss (which I own on F mount) and nicer in its rendering to my personal taste.
Great info. Your watch sounds beautiful 😊
A 55mm f1.2 is best for both eyes open photography (eye to the camera and eye outside the camera both open at the same time).
You see the world with essentially the same magnification on an OM1 or OM2 through both eyes and with a brighter image (ok, same with the 50mm f1.2) than the other 50mm lenses.
OM1 & OM2 have a viewfinder magnification of 0.92.
(1 - (0.92 * 50)/50)100% = -8.0%
(1 - (0.92 * 55)/50)100% = +1.2%
OM2s has a viewfinder magnification of 0.86.
(1 - (0.86 * 50)/50)100% = -14.0%
(1 - (0.86 * 55)/50)100% = -5.4%
OM3 & OM4 have a viewfinder magnification of 0.84.
(1 - (0.84 * 50)/50)100% = -16.0%
(1 - (0.84 * 55)/50)100% = -7.6%
A brighter screen can decrease the maybe two stop loss in image brightness, lens vs reality, on OM1s and OM2s at the expense of introducing a metering difference off the screen.
Get a brighter 2-13 screen from an OM3 or OM4 or find a Beattie screen and install that in place of the original viewfinder screen.
Note that for the 2-13 you would have to shave off some of the screen's grab-tab to install it as it will otherwise not fit in the screen's frame.
Think that other manufacturers made their fastest glass as 55mm or 58mm partially for this reason, to better allow both eyes open photography, a nice-to-have about which few noticed or cared.
Thinking too that between wanting to put data outside the screen and Nikon touting eyepoint advantages especially for eyeglass wearers with their F3hp the whole idea (not popular in the first place) lost its luster in favor of lower viewfinder magnifications and heading back to 50mm for fast glass.
If something is wrong then please correct me.
What am I saying...this is the internet of course someone will correct me.
So many lenses to choose from!
I just realised this morning that you have been filming Zenography for 6 years! I wonder how many lenses have passed through your hands in that time, and how many actually got the "Zenography Seal of Approval"?
Another great video and more lenses to think about.
Thank you.
Quite a few have passed through my hands, no doubt about that! As for the seal of approval, well, quite a lot of them, to be honest - each has a different character, and I've found very few outright bad ones! Glad you're still enjoying the videos!
In large part due to this channel I am very much enjoy using my growing collection of vintage lenses, most of them Olympus lenses. It has come to the point where if a camera manufacturer came out with a full frame mirrorless camera without auto focus I would probably buy it. Lol unlikely to happen I suppose. I enjoy doing my own focusing and I find it easier to manually focus a vintage lens than a modern digital lens.
It's very simple with focus peaking - it lets vintage lenses come into their own!
I had an OM 10 when New so prob would not have one again...but maybe another model.
Next up, the 50mm f2 macro and the 40mm f2 pancake?
Really enjoyed the comparison and I think it's nice that you got another copy of the 55mm and reviewed it again. Same thing happened when I picked up the newest version of the 1.4 lens. The silver nose version was much softer and not as well behaved. Ever since I got the f2 macro it sits on the shelf though.
I'd love to try the 40 and 50 f2 - maybe someday!
@@zenography7923 if you're ever in Heidelberg I can help you out! The city is definitely a good playground for both lenses.
The 1.8 is a corker. I just got one on an OM20 body and am getting an adapter to go on my new (i.e. old) Sony A7 body. Very portable and stopped down just one stop it gives lovely colour and centre sharpness with that old-school Olympus nostalgic character. I'll be getting some more Olympus lenses..
The zuikos are very hard to beat, and that 1.8 is quite something!
Really enjoying your comparisons, as I delve into my growing collection of legacy glass.
It would help all viewers immensely if you had TC markers for each of the lenses you mention. 👍
Thanks Sergei, glad you're enjoying the videos!
Had a 50mm f1.4 on my OM4 back when I shot a lot of Kodachrome 24 and 64 for picture library stock. Competent performer, sharp with good contrast, but not quite in the same league as Zeiss 50mm offerings for Rollei and Contax cameras that I subsequently moved to.
Very interesting video, as always. And very nice images too!... Thanks.
Thanks Enrico, glad you enjoyed it!
I have three copies of the 55 1.2 & two copies of the 50 1.2
Personally, I prefer the 55, for its greater character. The 50 has smoother, creamier out of focus areas. The differences are not huge, but are there. So it does depend upon what an individual values in the rendering, I just happen to like the more unusual effects some lenses give.
I know what you mean - the 50 is technically very nice, but the 55 is something else!
I have the 1.4, but I use it as a video lens for filming with a digital camera. It is simply amazing. I think I need to pay 10x more to get a better video lens. The color and smoothness are natural and magical.
I use to use the Olympus 50mm F/1.4 but now use the Pentax SMC-A 50mm F/1.2 and it is the best 50mm I have used for filmmaking
You don't need to spend 10 x more to get a better video lens
@@life107familyfitnessboxing8 Good to know, thanks
I just bought the Olympus 55mm f1.2 and it is the most radioactive lens I have so far at 3385 CPM, SN 117492.
However, I read and then tested that Plexiglass blocks Alpha particles. I tried 1 inch of the stuff and it knocked 3385 coming off the front lens, down to 540 CPM. The 55 is very sharp, IF you can find the in-focus area. You will need a well controlled environment and a tripod.
Plastic is easy to handle.
This is in no way a snapshot lens. I will be using a tripod most of the time. At f1.2 it is a job to find the "In Focus" area of the subject. This is what makes any f1.2 lens a fun challenge to use. I found it is best to use a fast shutter speed with a high ASA setting.
At this point I like both the Olympus OM-System G.Zuiko Auto-S 55mm f1.2 1974 Radioactive 3389 CPM, but I like the Canon FL 55mm f1.2 Fluorite Lens 1968 color better at this point.
Jim
I guess you must have an earlier version of the lens - as I understand it, the thoriated elements were changed for non-thoriated ones around serial number 136000 or so? Later ones, I've learned, have a yellow coating that looks like radioactive yellowing, but isn't. I think that's right anyway!
I just got my OM-1 yesterday, what a nice surprise. Thank you sir!
no problem, glad you enjoyed it!
8:00 The Zuiko 50mm f/1.8 has one difference from the others. A plastic aperture ring! The numbers are more deeply engraved in it so I wouldn't complain. I had never felt such a quality sense on a lens before I got one new with a little OM-10, which was cheap and had a near silent shutter. I wish I still had it.
Does the 55mm lens have intermediate aperture click like f1.4 or f1.7 between f1.2 and f2.0? Contemplating to buy a 55mm thoriated version. Thanks for your informative videos💐
Just getting into the Zuiko lenses and this was an enjoyable watch thank you.
I found myself wondering what make of watch you are wearing in this video. Looks like an Omega.
It's a late '60s Longines, a beautiful old machine
Great videos and very informative - thanks
Thanks, glad you enjoyed it!
Olympus is my favorite.
My collection at this point is:
Olympus OM-System G.Zuiko Auto-S 55mm f1.2 1974 Radioactive 3389 CPM (BEST f1.2 ever)
Olympus OM-System Zuiko MC Auto-S 50mm f1.4 Black Nose Radioactive 460 CPM (also Great)
Olympus OM-System H.Zuiko Auto-W 24mm f2.8 MF
However, it is winter and that is when I buy lenses.
Several years ago I used to go to all the charity stores thrift shops whatever you want to call them in my town in the Pacific Northwest with my wife to search for old cameras and lenses all the time. While visiting one of the shops one day there were several cameras and some lenses in the case so I asked to look at those. Among the group there of mostly 10 or $20 cameras and lenses there were two Olympus lenses. Both 50mm in near mint condition one was the kit lens 50mm 1.8 and the other was 50mm 1.2 and the price on each of those was $15. As you might imagine I got pretty excited. I knew the 1.2 lens was very valuable but I really didn't have any idea I just thought wow that's an awful good deal. When I got home I did a search to find what they were selling for and I was pretty shocked. So i cleaned it up a little put an adapter on my Canon DSLR did some test shots put it on eBay and resold it. I had about 300 or so cameras and lenses at the time so it had to go. In all my years of vintage camera equipment hunting it was one of my greatest finds. So this was a few years back so it sold for a little less than the price that you mentioned in your video. Thank you so much for sharing these reviews of these old lenses I really enjoy them.
That was indeed a good find - that 50 1.2 is a real stunner! Well done sir!
I don't have any Vintage OM lenses for my E-M1 mk ii.
Yet .........
I do have 2 on their way to me though : Zuiko Auto-T 75-150mm f4.0 & Zuiko Auto-T 300mm f4.5.
So now you can guarantee it will be persisting down for a couple of weeks 🌧.
I don't know is there more versions of Zuiko 50mm f1,4 (other than silver nose version), but mine (black nose) is slightly soft wide open. So soft that my 50mm f1,8 is much sharper at f1,8. However, as expected, stopped down to f2 increases sharpness dramatically...
The zuiko 1.4 is a bit soft wide open, but to my eyes entirely useable, and although the silver nose can lose contrast I love its colours and character.
On the 50/1.8, I remember the multicoated version marked "made in Japan" (with that capitalization) was claimed by some Zuiko lovers to be the best. It's the only version I have and I can't compare it with others, so I really can't say through experience, but it might be worth looking for that specifically if you want one. It's one of the best 50s I've ever used (if not quite as good as the 50/3.5).
I think it might be slightly nicer, I find images just that little bit more crisp.
Recently got a similar 50/1.8 MIJ in a good condition, obviously one of the later versions (the serial number is >5 mil). I use with a speedbooster which turns it into a 70 mm equivalent. Like other OM Zuikos, the 50 feels very well made and looks lovely on my E-M1. I've never had other legacy 50s, but this one definitely requires a more thoughtful approach compared to modern m4/3 lenses or even its OM Zuiko 100/2.8 counterpart which I also own. Up close, centre sharpness is pretty good wide open but it's better to stop down to at least f2.8 with off-centre subjects. Bokeh is nice and smooth at close range but gets progressively worse with more and more outlining as the focus distance increases. Sharpness also deteriorates with distance so I'd rather stop down to at least f5.6 or even f8 for landscape shots. Flare resistance is okay and axial CAs not very prominent for a legacy lens. Anyway, the 50/1.8 is definitely not the kind of lens I'd use for "run and gun" photography, but I'm pretty certain it can deliver the goodies if used to its strengths.
Again a lovely video, hope you make a 35mm edition as well.
If I can collect enough together, I will!
Another stunning review comparison. I have been very pleased with the Om Zuiko lenses I have used with the exception being the chrome nose 50mm f1.4. Its a bit too soft and low contrast wide open for my liking. The Canon FD 50mm 1.4 is quite a bit nicer to my eyes.
The fd 1.4 is quite something, no doubt about it. When I tested 1.4s though, I found the 80s Minolta even nicer!
@@zenography7923 Thanks for the reply and info. I have only used the MC Rokkor-PF 55mm f1.7. I really like the way that lens makes B&W. A lot of silver in the images.
What 35mm colour films you use when trying out the zuiko lenses or do you use a digital body camera.
Really enjoyed that overview, thank you! I just purchased and OM-1n with a 50 f/1.8 a few months back and am nearing the end of my first roll. Out of curiosity, what watch are you wearing in this video?
24:57 200! Повезло так повезло. Поздравляю. А 50/1.2 кайфовый
You should do a video on the TechArt Manual lens Autofocus Adapter its great with OM glass.
I'll check it out, thanks for the tip!
Getting a OM10 next Friday...will need a 50mm this vid helps ...cheers and thanks
Glad to be of help - enjoy the OM10, it's a very nice camera!
Another informative video. Love my 50mm 1.4, great colours, using it on my Sony, but heavy in weight.
It's a little heavy, but great images nontheless - enjoy!
All that glass! Plus the fabulous quality metal construction.
The one you left out of this presentation is the wonderful, but rare and expensive, 50mm f/2 macro.
I'd like to try one of those - ah well, maybe someday!
@@zenography7923 I was very fortunate to procure one from KEH here in the US in 2016 for just $345. They were having a 20% off sale on all film camera lenses, and this example had been engraved by a previous owner, resulting in further discount. I can share a few sample photos, if you are interested.
You missed the 50mm f/2 macro! It's from the same cohort of exotic late Zuikos as the the "exquisitely engineered" 100mm f/2, as you called it. As such, I will likely never own one myself, but I'd love to get a close look at one from your perspective as a fellow Zuiko fan.
I've never used the 50 f2 macro unfortunately - would love to though!
I used the 1,8 for a long time and was perfectly happy. Than I somehow got the 1,4 (attached to an OM-2 or OM-1) and had high hopes. To be honest, the difference is minimal up to not being there at all.
The Pancolar is more contrasty, almost too contrasty and saturated.
Is that a Doxa watch you are wearing?
what camera was used for these images? that sony on the table?
Great recommendations as always!
Also interested in the (vintage?) watch you’re wearing too!
I've been noticing that too, what brand is it I wonder?
@@scottsinaz3000 Would love to see macros or close up of it. Guessing a Longines?
images.app.goo.gl/gFZfedHfEGuFkmSt7
It's a longines from - I think - 1967, another piece of old tech!
@@zenography7923 Nice! Personally would love to purchase a vintage (pre-Swatch) Longines or Omega, great history from both brands. My dad used to own a vintage Longines Admiral 5 Star that he regretted selling
@@zenography7923 Nice watch, thanks for sharing.
Very cool.
Btw how much (if at all) post processing do you do on the images you show?
All the images are straight out of camera, although I do make the occasional adjustment to exposure if it's needed.
I bought an Om-1 MD 35mm that came with a 50mm 1:1,8. I was wondering what lens you would recommend?
have a 50mm, 28mm and a 75mm - 150mm, love me some OM lenses
They're hard to beat, for sure!
Hi.
Only the first versions of the 55mm f/1.2 (those with the silver filter ring) had thoriated lenses.
Later version of this lens (black filter ring) don't (I measured mine and tests negative).
That's interesting, thanks - maybe the coating is giving the yellow tint?
@@zenography7923 I have some other lenses (different brands) which seem to have the typical yellowish tint of glass with thorium, but they are not radioactive.
Looking at them from different angles, the colour does not seem to be generated by the coating. but it looks like it is coming from the entire mass of the glass.
I am a little bit afraid of experimenting ways to "remove" this tint, because in the end I like the way colours are rendered.
Even if the hue was caused by some kind of modification of the internal glass structure (reversible or not), the resulting effect seems to have added a pleasant and interesting feature to the characteristics of the lens - isn't that what we are looking for when buying these lenses?
I have the 50mm 1.4 that I use with a Canon camera. It is soft at times but can be sharper if stopped down. It does have great bokeh wide open.
However I shoot macro and feel this isn’t quite the lens for me yet. It has advantages that the Canon 100mm doesn’t have but I tend to use the Canon lens most of the time.
I’m not thinking of moving away from Canon and Olympus is an option but I’m not quite ready to buy the Olympus 90mm yet. Which one of these would you recommend instead? And are they all manual only even with an Olympus camera?
Thanks
All the OM Zuiko lenses (that's those made for Olympus film cameras, as featured here) were manual focus only. In the days of the OM cameras autofocus hadn't arrived on the SLR scene. I think on the Canon 5D cameras you can change the focussing screen for one with a manual focus prism built in (like those that used to be used in manual focus SLRs), so focussing should be pretty easy with one of these.
@@zenography7923 That’s good to know! I will look for that setting.
To my opinion, the Olympus film cameras' problem is their mount tirage meaning that you can only use Leica R, dunno-which-other-one and Zuiko lenses on it without loosing infinity. This makes them less attractive in choosing a lens. I have a Canon AE1-Program and a OM-1n bodies that both work great but no lenses to mount on top, yet. I'm more interested in keeping the Canon since I can mount more lenses on it.
What do you think?
It depends what you want to do. You can certainly adapt more lenses to the Canon mount, but I'm more than happy with my Olympus lenses and cameras, and don't really want to mount any other lenses on them.
Hi! Quick question: do you store your lenses with their diaphragm closed (f16 or above) or wide open? I can't seem to close the diaphragm on the Olympus 50mm I just bought and I don't see any manual/auto function or safety pin. Thank you
I own about 20 OM Zuiko lenses and when taken from the camera, the diaphragm of the lens will be wide open. There must me a spring in the lens to do this. So wide open is better I presume.
Nice content, but try to keep the mic away from you watch as it was picking the the ticking sound quite well.
Sorry about that
quite wonderful sample images and collection.
I would like to ask what 35mm do you recommend when I've already owned the 50mm?
If you're thinking zuiko, the 35 f3.5 is very nice...
@@zenography7923 an f3.5 i imagine it to be very compact - near pancake as well.
sounds very interesting thank you for the recommendation
is there a way to mount Takumar and other m42 lenses to Olympus body?
No adapters exist readily for sale, because the OM lens system had a longer flange distance (rear element to sensor/film) than nearly all other SLR systems. What that means is, if you mount a Takumar or M42 lens on an Olympus, you physically won’t be able to focus at infinity, or even a bit off infinity. For that reason no one commercially makes those adapters - as far as I’m aware - even if you only wanted to use the lens for close targets. It is perhaps the biggest disadvantage of the OM system.
I have a f1.8 version on my OM-1. When viewing through the view finder however there seems to be vignetting. Granted this lens was very inexpensive and not purchased through a dealer. Any ideas? Thanks.
It's difficult to say exactly, although it sounds like something needs a clean - the 1.8 does have a little vignetting but it's not strong enough to see through the vf, unless you're really looking for it. Does the vignetting show at all aperture values, or just wide open?
Have you ever shot with the 90mm f2 ? I haveone and have never seen it in tour reviews that i am aware of.
I've shot the 85mm f2, which is a quite stunning lens, but not the 90.
How about the Olympus zukio 50 mm 1.4
An absolute gem, one of my favourites!
A very interesting video as always. For many years the silver nose 50/1.4 was my only lens on my OM-1 during Uni and after. To be honest, my copy wasn't very good, and I eventually got fed up with repairs on my various Olympus equipment.
Glad you enjoyed the video, many thanks!
lenses can have faults. Mid eighties, I tipped up my cash to buy a Zuiko 24 shift - it took six weeks to be delivered. I took it home and ran a roll of film thro, dev'd & printed - there was a soft spot size of a 10p piece! The lens got swapped in three days.
Why six weeks to deliver and three days to swap? Grump.
That Zuiko 24 is still in my bag, converted to nikon f.
It sounds like a sweet little lens - well worth the wait!
@@zenography7923 I now have 4 (yes, four) shift lenses. 24mm is how I see the world. (Conditioned by some 50yrs in architecture.) The Zuiko is the most user friendly in terms of functionality - shifting X & Y (remember to press the stop down button!) on mere finger pressure. With a gridded screen, many, many hundreds of images made hand-held. (Only grump is the inbuilt filter ring - easy to turn unintentionaly.) 24mm is my 'normal' view of the street, 15mm is my wide angle & that too is a shift. (Laowa)
Objective view (!). Folks forget that lenses form a circular image. Schneider etc. always declared the coverage (circle) for each lens. The diagonal of the 35mm frame is about 43.25mm, ergo image circle has to be ~that diam.. The Laowa shifts about 11mm each way (according to autocad), that is an image circle of about 74mm diam.. Subjective user review available & images available.
Could you tell me which machine you used to test these lenses? If there were more cameras, please let us know!!
Thanks :)
All these images were shot on my Sony A7 Mk1.
@@zenography7923 thanks for the fast reply mate! Do you have a video where we could see photos made with these (or a few of these) lenses but with the OM2?
Olympus 50mm 1.8 Zuiko MC Auto-S Lens question. In the US most lens just say Japan but your lens says Made in Japan. Is there an acutal difference in the lenses or does it just depend on where it was sold? Thanks!!
Most zuiko lenses are marked 'Japan', however the very latest ones are marked 'Made In Japan' - they're slightly optically superior.
@@zenography7923 Thank you so much!! Good to know!! They are not as easy to find but sounds like they are worth the extra effort to seek out.
You still need to test the "king" of the 50mm Zuikos, the 50mm f2 Macro ;-)
Oh, I would certainly like to try one of those!
anyone can help me and say what mount is de 55mm 1.2 to search the converter to use it in my sony 7siii? thanks!
It's called the OM Zuiko mount
What to you think abot the Lensbaby Velvet 56mm f/1.6 ????
I've never tried that one - sounds nice though!
@@zenography7923 I think you would like it! Its a blur and bokeh machine!!! Thx for answer!!!! BTW I ordred 2 lenses according to you videos! The Helios 44-2 and the Helios 44-3!
Can you make a video like this, but with Pentax lenses, please!?! :-)
I was doing fine untill you flashed the front element of that beautiful 55 1.2. I'm a big fan of "slow" vintage macro lenses. A nikkor 55 3.5 lives on my Fuji
I know what you mean - I've a real soft spot for the Olympus 50 3.5 macro!
Thank you very much .
Around 40 years ago ,
I bought used Olympus .
OM 1 + 50mm f.1.8 8,000 Yen.
OM 1 New + 50mm f.1.4 15,000 Yen .
OM 28mm f.3.5 6,000 Yen .
OM 135mm f.3.5 3,000 Yen .
OM 100mm f.2 15,000 Yen.
OM 50mm f.1.8 is superb .
But 50mm f.1.8 and 135mm f.3.5 ,
I couldn’t find them in my room .
But those must be existing .
I love those film loading type cameras .
But I couldn’t buy films for them anymore .
Simply , from my monetary reason .
I have been deeply sorry to them .
I love Olympus blue , and red , of them colors .
Apr. 10th 2024 Wed. 07:21 am
from Yokohama City Japan
The OM 40 which is plastic fantastic... they put 2 layers of paint on top plate a sort of bronze one then black over that to mimic brassing eventually... these are pricey for what they are too methinks.....
What’s your favourite 50 vintage
There are many I like, but my everyday favourites are the Carl Zeiss Jena 50mm f1.8 pancolar, the olympus zuiko 50mm f1.8 (final version, serial number over 1,000,000), and the Pentax 55mm f1.8. If money were no object though I'd get an Olympus Zuiko 50mm f1.2 - an outstanding optic.
@@zenography7923 hi thanks for the quick reply, i have 2 xpro xE1, in terms of auto 3rd party lens which will you recommend around 56mm for portrait
Who writes this stuff?
Yours truly my friend - this is a one man band!
I was referring to the rock band references. :-)
It was unique.
Did you shot this episode on a fuji? Looks very fuji-esque, great videos as always!
Yes, shot on a Fuji X-T2 - glad you enjoyed it, thanks!
Love your videos, but please don't wear your watch it's distracting as hell while your voice is very soothing and pleasant.
14:55 мой 1.4 очень лягкий и был разачарован сразу после покупки
Жаль это слышать - обычно это действительно хороший объектив. Может у тебя ошибка?
Sorry to hear that - it's usually a really nice lens. Perhaps yours has a fault?
@@zenography7923 Наверное у меня были завишенные ожидания перед покупкой
25:48 Media Offline!
There’s a reason my nickname is “Zuikoholic”
11:41 классная картинка
I keep ending up watching your videos only to have my ears assaulted by the intro sound. 😭
Sorry - I always keep the intro sound volume very low, but perhaps it's still too high?
@@zenography7923 I think so 🤕