Best wall scanner BOSCH D-TECT120 vs ZIRCON stud sensor

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 27 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 17

  • @bazmoshtael8210
    @bazmoshtael8210 3 місяці тому

    The problem is, it doesn't say if it's a pipe or a stud. It just says there's something there.
    And when you're trying to put something in the studs...

  • @narendrabhatia6140
    @narendrabhatia6140 Рік тому

    Excellent explanation given technical specification 👍🙏

  • @matondomuenzemt3561
    @matondomuenzemt3561 Рік тому

    Dear, I just watched your video. Please I am working with 40cm reinforced concrete. Which Detector should I use that has a lot of capacity in terms of depth . To target and detect the material lying on this wall

    • @DIYhabitat
      @DIYhabitat  Рік тому +1

      40cm is a big distance to detect metallic materials under concrete. What objects are you attempting to detect in the concrete? I suspect this is industrial-grade problem which requires expensive industrial-grade professional equipment like Ground-Penetrating-Radar. Is this a problem you are working on for a company, for work? Or for your own personal project?

  • @zoomtank69
    @zoomtank69 5 місяців тому

    Sir, what model is the Zircon scanner, how much is it and where I can fix d, please..?

    • @DIYhabitat
      @DIYhabitat  5 місяців тому

      you will be able find various Zircon models by google.

  • @gerardokeller4496
    @gerardokeller4496 8 місяців тому

    ,RECIEN VEO ESTE VIDEO, ENCONTRASTE ALGUIN ESCANER CON MAYOR PRECISION PARA CAÑOS DE AGUA de 12 CM MINIMO ( plomo , galvanizado. pvc , etc )

    • @DIYhabitat
      @DIYhabitat  7 місяців тому

      in the user-manuals, accuracy of D-TEC120 is +-10mm. Whereas accuracy of D-TECT200 is +-5mm. Suggest you investigate.

  • @peterago1082
    @peterago1082 Рік тому

    TY

  • @Calimarcus85
    @Calimarcus85 11 місяців тому

    how do i know if im detecting a water filled pipe versus a stud?? thank you

    • @DIYhabitat
      @DIYhabitat  11 місяців тому

      The tool does not distinguish between a hollow metal-pipe vs a water-filled metal-pipe. It cannot tell you it is a pipe beneath. Only tells that something dense is beneath.
      As for distinguishing between timber wall-studs vs metal-pipes.Vertical wall-studs are evenly spaced apart, & of a standard stud width. Typically, in a house, a metal pipe would likely be narrower than a stud, & not spaced regularly across wall.
      here is link to BOSCH D-TEC120 website where you can download the instruction manual doc. www.bosch-pt.com.au/au/en/products/d-tect-120-06010813K0

  • @Bingdum
    @Bingdum Рік тому

    Thanks for this

    • @Bingdum
      @Bingdum Рік тому

      I am trying it with plaster and not sure how well it works!

    • @DIYhabitat
      @DIYhabitat  Рік тому

      should be easy to detect through plasterboard wall.

  • @Betz23K
    @Betz23K 7 місяців тому

    on drywall and bricks - the results searching for electric cables + metall-pipes vary if your hands have contact with the wall or not
    .. depends on how you are grounded - bosch recommends not to change hand-on & hand-off during measuring-searching

    • @DIYhabitat
      @DIYhabitat  7 місяців тому

      Thanks for the reminder. You raised an interesting aspect.
      For non-electrical materials, detection is via Radar system. However, for detection of LIVE AC-current electrical-wires, detection is done via EMF (Electro-Magnetic-Field) detection. Hence, when attempting to detect LIVE AC-current electrical-wires over a large area, it is useful to discharge body static-electricity by placing hand on wall - as you said. It also makes detection easier when electrical equipment - which are connected to the LIVE AC-current circuits - are switched on. As the LIVE-circuits generates stronger EMF to enable easier detection.
      The caution then is that if there are AC-current electrical-wires behind a wall, & the circuit(s) is/are not LIVE (e.g. the switch-board circuit-breaker is switched off). Then the D-TEC120 will not detect existence of LIVE-wires. Thus a user may misconstrue that to mean there is something there, but no electrical-wire behind that wall. Then if the user drills/cuts that area of wall, & later switches back on the power to that circuit. It becomes a serious electrical safety hazard.
      Another caution to note is that this device does not detect LIVE DC-current electrical-circuits. This can be a serious problem as more homes, caravans, trailers, motorhomes are powered by solar-powered battery-systems.
      But for detection of non-electrical materials (water-pipes, timber-studs, steel-posts, etc), radar system is used, & placing of hands on wall to discharge static-electricity would not be required.
      What are your thoughts?