How to calculate coupling constants

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 17 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 27

  • @JerryXGamer
    @JerryXGamer 6 місяців тому +1

    youtube videos like this are saving me right now. 10x better and more clear than our professor that presented this

    • @lindsayharding8930
      @lindsayharding8930 6 місяців тому

      Thanks for the feedback, I’m really glad you found it helpful!

  • @abdelhamedmohamed2969
    @abdelhamedmohamed2969 Рік тому +2

    Thank you so much, looks so simple but it is not mentioned often.

  • @katherineworks3233
    @katherineworks3233 9 місяців тому +1

    If only my lab instructors could explain these concepts even half as clearly as you.

  • @AlphaNumeric123
    @AlphaNumeric123 Рік тому

    Really clear video, very practical, thank you

  • @bahmanramazani1099
    @bahmanramazani1099 4 роки тому

    Thank you so much for your time and valuable video, I really appreciate it.

  • @yohonepaligyan2014
    @yohonepaligyan2014 5 років тому

    To calculate the distance you have said at 1:16 that whether we calculate from left hand peak or right hand peak we should get the same answer but we dont. Even in my work that I have to submit I am not getting same. Is this normal in HNMR?

  • @eddielookingbeautifulbravo8
    @eddielookingbeautifulbravo8 7 років тому +2

    Best vid ever. Thanks for help.

  • @leonardomonteiro2187
    @leonardomonteiro2187 6 років тому

    Thank you very much. With this video, I understand...

  • @lydiac.pascual8767
    @lydiac.pascual8767 4 роки тому

    Thank you so much! Very clear explanation.

  • @whatsupdude4813
    @whatsupdude4813 7 років тому

    Great explanation,plz keep it up!

  • @annamayinzenhofer9331
    @annamayinzenhofer9331 3 роки тому

    great video! two questions: 1: how do you get 7.2 Hz from plugging in 500 MHz at 3:41 .. wouldn't it be 7.1 * 10^6? Hz ? 2: I thought the coupling constant was supposed to be independent from the external magnetic field? why do we multiply it by 500 then?

    • @AnalyticalScienceTutor
      @AnalyticalScienceTutor  3 роки тому +5

      Hi, the ppm cancel out the MHz, as you have 10^-6 x 10^6. So we just omit both from the calculation for shorthand.
      The coupling constant in Hz IS independent of the applied field, but because we are starting our calculation with ppm, which are dependent on field, then we need to take the field into account. 1 ppm on a 500 MHz spectrometer is a different number of Hz (500) from what it would be on a 400 MHz instrument (400 Hz) so we need to take this into account in the conversion from ppm to Hz.

  • @SavedSis
    @SavedSis 5 років тому

    Can you do this with carbon nmr?

    • @AnalyticalScienceTutor
      @AnalyticalScienceTutor  5 років тому +3

      Hi, carbon-13 NMR spectra are almost always run without coupling (it is removed in the experiment) as it tends to make the signals overlap (and therefore it gets really difficult to see what's going on). We would normally use 2-dimensional NMR methods to determine carbon coupling constants.

  • @sultanaafroza7387
    @sultanaafroza7387 4 роки тому

    Thank u so much Mam

  • @jaymysupj4384
    @jaymysupj4384 7 років тому +1

    Good.
    Thank you. *-*

  • @altafshaikh3280
    @altafshaikh3280 4 роки тому

    very usefull

  • @renubalot3170
    @renubalot3170 4 роки тому

    Txs ma'am

  • @ShumetAdugna
    @ShumetAdugna 6 місяців тому

    it is good

  • @elaissasanjose5668
    @elaissasanjose5668 5 років тому

    So if I get a lower Hz value, thats a cis?

  • @devadasuchapala741
    @devadasuchapala741 6 років тому +1

    Thanks a lot

  • @ganeshgaur2002
    @ganeshgaur2002 4 місяці тому

    thanks a lot