it's amazing! this guy is basically doing what teachers used to do on the black/white boards and OHPs in classrooms... and after 20 years of fancy pant powerpoint styled presentations and what not.. people has finally come to realize that this works the best for learning! omG we've finally come round 360. thank God!
@dieonyourfeetDEC16 Finally, it is very common for additional private placements because unless the company is operating cash flow positive, they'll need to either A) refinance (debt or equity/share offerings) or B) Sell assets. Private placements are common for companies that are trying to grow. For example, many gold companies decide to initiate PP's to continue exploration or to finance a mining facility. However the latter is usually a hybrid of debt/equity. Hope that clears it up!
@dieonyourfeetDEC16 Good question. After a company performs an IPO, it is true that they receive the cash and they offer shares in return. After the IPO the secondary market may seem like it doesn't affect the company but it does. For one, the company has management and directors that are granted stock options that provide an incentive to be obsessed with getting their ticker as high as possible. That way they may exercise them for secondary income on top of their salaries.
what happens to private equity holders share when the company first goes public? can they go and sell the shares? in ur example there are 10m shares in market( that can be traded on public exchanges) and there are 14m share( i.e 10m ipo shares and 4m private equity holders in company).
one reason could be hostile takeovers - as their value is assessed based on the current trading price of the target company's share price of additional shares issued is calculated from the average price of the closing price of the share over the last month or so
@dieonyourfeetDEC16 Also, a worse share price means when they want cash, they'll have to issue a LOT more shares. More shares = more dilution which means a smaller EPS share. This means less profit per owner of the company. Which is a big deal when your operating publicly.
@dieonyourfeetDEC16 Secondly, you were right when about additional offerings. If the company is not a cash cow, it might have to place additional private placements. Which are offering shares usually to wealthy clients at different brokerages, but many retail investors may also subscribe. If they don't care about their share price then nobody will want to subscribe to their placement. No interest = No cash.
You are right... well, sort of... Again... I didn't talk about the resource itself; I talked about using a hand written style to explain an subject that it's particularly IMPORTANT for financial literacy purposes. Case-in-point: I'm not against financial literacy; Sal covers the subject really good although he could have used a PPT presentation? Who's the "asshole" here? Not me (that's for sure)... besides, he doesn't need "bodyguards", Does he?
The subject is important in terms of financial literacy but it is awful in terms of its presentation... Please pay more attention to the presentation... I can't understand what you write.
it's amazing! this guy is basically doing what teachers used to do on the black/white boards and OHPs in classrooms... and after 20 years of fancy pant powerpoint styled presentations and what not.. people has finally come to realize that this works the best for learning! omG we've finally come round 360. thank God!
he has a top hat. and thank you very much for you for the vids dude
Awesome teachings
Thank You Khan for the update and for the first time since I think of that information.... thanks again ✌️
Thanks again ✌️
Thanks again ✌️
@dieonyourfeetDEC16 Finally, it is very common for additional private placements because unless the company is operating cash flow positive, they'll need to either A) refinance (debt or equity/share offerings) or B) Sell assets. Private placements are common for companies that are trying to grow. For example, many gold companies decide to initiate PP's to continue exploration or to finance a mining facility. However the latter is usually a hybrid of debt/equity. Hope that clears it up!
@dieonyourfeetDEC16 Good question. After a company performs an IPO, it is true that they receive the cash and they offer shares in return. After the IPO the secondary market may seem like it doesn't affect the company but it does. For one, the company has management and directors that are granted stock options that provide an incentive to be obsessed with getting their ticker as high as possible. That way they may exercise them for secondary income on top of their salaries.
Wow. Sensational.
that was wonderful
GJ..! really enjoyed your videos
what happens to private equity holders share when the company first goes public?
can they go and sell the shares? in ur example there are 10m shares in market( that can be traded on public exchanges) and there are 14m share( i.e 10m ipo shares and 4m private equity holders in company).
one reason could be hostile takeovers - as their value is assessed based on the current trading price of the target company's share
price of additional shares issued is calculated from the average price of the closing price of the share over the last month or so
@dieonyourfeetDEC16 Also, a worse share price means when they want cash, they'll have to issue a LOT more shares. More shares = more dilution which means a smaller EPS share. This means less profit per owner of the company. Which is a big deal when your operating publicly.
It was the top hat that made this video
@dieonyourfeetDEC16 Secondly, you were right when about additional offerings. If the company is not a cash cow, it might have to place additional private placements. Which are offering shares usually to wealthy clients at different brokerages, but many retail investors may also subscribe. If they don't care about their share price then nobody will want to subscribe to their placement. No interest = No cash.
Hello
"Well maybe he's happy....right, cause' he got $100 dollars. He's got a TopHat..." haha, too funny.
You are right... well, sort of...
Again... I didn't talk about the resource itself; I talked about using a hand written style to explain an subject that it's particularly IMPORTANT for financial literacy purposes.
Case-in-point: I'm not against financial literacy; Sal covers the subject really good although he could have used a PPT presentation?
Who's the "asshole" here? Not me (that's for sure)... besides, he doesn't need "bodyguards", Does he?
I have a ?
This is me
With a moustache
The subject is important in terms of financial literacy but it is awful in terms of its presentation...
Please pay more attention to the presentation... I can't understand what you write.
wasn't Sal on CNN because of his horrible presentation skills?