Lilium Jet achieves full transition on wings and canards

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 26 вер 2022
  • Watch as Phoenix 2, our 5th Generation Technology Demonstrator, achieves full transition from hover to wing-borne flight on both the wings and canards.
    The full transition flight behaved precisely as our models predicted - representing a further validation of the flight physics computational models and technological approach that are the basis of our production aircraft, the Lilium Jet.
    Flight details:
    Flight Test Objective: Full Transition
    Aircraft: Phoenix 2 Technology Demonstrator
    Pilot: Remote
    Location: ATLAS Flight test center, Spain
    Propulsion: 36 electric engines
  • Авто та транспорт

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1,6 тис.

  • @91djdj
    @91djdj Рік тому +414

    I just love what you're doing with Lilium. It's always great to see the progress in the videos. Can't wait to be in one of the jets!

    • @helmutpohl2762
      @helmutpohl2762 Рік тому

      ....hope You will not die in one .....completely senseless project it needs 20 x - times STRONGER batteries, which do not exist .....

    • @davidcharles223
      @davidcharles223 Рік тому +3

      Would be great if we invest in them by buying some shares.

    • @91djdj
      @91djdj Рік тому +3

      @@davidcharles223 I will, in the very near future

    • @subhradeepsharma
      @subhradeepsharma Рік тому

      Are you a bot ? 😮 You talk like one wtf

    • @RichardBaran
      @RichardBaran Рік тому +1

      Do you need a polits license?

  • @MrBirchieBirch
    @MrBirchieBirch Рік тому +23

    This is by far the most practical 'personal flyer' I've seen.

    • @nostro1940
      @nostro1940 Рік тому +2

      So you have never seen an helicopter?
      🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂

  • @troyc382
    @troyc382 Рік тому +116

    Wow! Looks like it's achieving laminar flow over wings, that's very good see! Congrats you guys, thanks for keeping us posted on the progress!

    • @spartanslaxwax
      @spartanslaxwax Рік тому +3

      So many questions left still:
      Whether or not this could perform in high DA environments, altitude restrictions, performance and envelope?
      Too much unknown. Super cool concept though

    • @guidodresemann8494
      @guidodresemann8494 Рік тому +27

      on the rear wing it looked fine, but on the front canards even @~100kts the flow looked rather turbulent.

    • @Wutzmename
      @Wutzmename Рік тому +8

      Not over the front nacelles they weren't. Very rarely they were. GOOD DAY TO YOU SIR! I...SAID...GOOD.....DAY!

    • @shaynepace571
      @shaynepace571 Рік тому

      I agree, Troy! Wow, just wow!!!!😂🤪

    • @billylloyd7488
      @billylloyd7488 Рік тому +2

      They did not achieve laminar flow over the engine pod and forward flight, it was defeated 20/30 degrees but they are getting there

  • @Harrzack
    @Harrzack Рік тому +363

    The vertical landing was stupendous…. Even if it isn’t the “first ever” 🥰🍺🍺

    • @remkojerphanion4686
      @remkojerphanion4686 Рік тому +6

      I agree, the landing looked perfect!

    • @EncrypticMethods
      @EncrypticMethods Рік тому +5

      @@CrashTestDummi Yeah it doesn't look like a glider (looks can be deceiving), and if one side of those engines failed thing would perform the best dynamic rollover ever. Don't take away from the fact that this was a perfect exhibition and that he absolutely buttered the shit out of that landing.

    • @LarsonLake
      @LarsonLake Рік тому +3

      @@CrashTestDummi It has 36 motors, so it'd probably be okay if 1 went out. I'd be interested in seeing videos of various engine failure scenario tests, if it's at all safe to do so.

    • @derickrk
      @derickrk Рік тому +2

      @@EncrypticMethods I don't think an thrust motor failed, since they have a lot for redundancy. My worry is about the tilt motor failing which I am not sure how they have a safety or redundancy for that ? like if one failed or was stuck in one position that would be disastrous. Though I am looking forward to how they address that. But have to say I am impressed so far. Looks cool too.

    • @abvmoose87
      @abvmoose87 Рік тому

      Good point

  • @agentred8732
    @agentred8732 Рік тому +100

    Where’s the pre-order link?

    • @av8tore71
      @av8tore71 Рік тому +3

      @agent Red, you would not be able to afford it!!

    • @peterosmond5742
      @peterosmond5742 Рік тому +1

      Where it at we need it

    • @dozer1642
      @dozer1642 Рік тому +5

      @@peterosmond5742 is that English?

    • @julesdomes6064
      @julesdomes6064 Рік тому +2

      You have 2.5 MUSD lying around?💰💰💰

    • @peterosmond5742
      @peterosmond5742 Рік тому +1

      @@julesdomes6064 possibly

  • @ryanstanley5634
    @ryanstanley5634 Рік тому +219

    After researching many EVTOLs, this seems the most practical. Very excited to see this company innovating

    • @tiutran2610
      @tiutran2610 Рік тому +12

      This and Joby aircraft seem to be the most survivable eVTOL concepts to date.

    • @Ilikeit616
      @Ilikeit616 Рік тому +2

      @@tiutran2610 I think you are right .... BUT .... Archer and evex is doin OK

    • @LegendLength
      @LegendLength Рік тому +4

      I still lean towards a static design (e.g. octocopter). But i have come around to the servo idea a fair bit. At first i was quite skeptical because of the moving part.
      However the prize of having normal winged flight is nice. A multirotor can't do that it's eternally suck in a poor flight mode.
      Ultimately i think the extra power needed for a static aircraft is worth it. With multirotor you are able to go in any direction instantly, winged aircraft can't.

    • @beeqool
      @beeqool Рік тому +1

      Have you seen jetoptera and mad bat?

    • @georgewashington1621
      @georgewashington1621 Рік тому +9

      @@LegendLength I was and still am a bit skeptical of the tilting mechanism, but i also had this thought - there are electric servos that move huge control surfaces on big jets with much higher load and they move them a LOT during each flight. So it will probably be fine.

  • @HeidiPatmore
    @HeidiPatmore Рік тому +28

    Geeking out SO HARD over this video. Congrats Team Lilium!

  • @remkojerphanion4686
    @remkojerphanion4686 Рік тому +8

    Excellent flight, so hats off to Lilium! I would also like to add that the statement on your website: "Zero operating emissions" reflects an honesty that I often miss with other manufacturers of EV's who claim "zero emissions". So, well done in that area too!

  • @drjthornley
    @drjthornley Рік тому +5

    Impressive with a perfect touch down. Crowd goes wild!

  • @stevekelsey4829
    @stevekelsey4829 Рік тому +33

    Congratulations! You have by far the best architecture I have seen for an electric VTOL jet. Exciting to see the steady progress you are making.

    • @cypvh74
      @cypvh74 Рік тому +6

      Not really a jet. Those are ducted fans.

    • @MotorcycleWrites
      @MotorcycleWrites Рік тому

      @@cypvh74 jet seems like a descriptive enough term for an electric plane with ducted fans to me. Wouldn’t be descriptive enough if you’re talking about planes in general, but if you specify electric I feel like it works.

    • @TC-kf9zw
      @TC-kf9zw Рік тому

      They are Dysons best fans......lol

    • @kkuhn
      @kkuhn Рік тому +2

      @@MotorcycleWrites No it's an electric ducted fan, not a jet engine

    • @MotorcycleWrites
      @MotorcycleWrites Рік тому

      @@kkuhn I am aware of that. I’m saying that “electric jet engine” is descriptive enough. You’re not going to get “electric jet” confused with a different kind of engine, and it does describe what’s happening (creating a jet of air with electricity).
      I’m aware that it is a different kind of engine to a gas-turbine powered engine. I’m just saying that “electric jet” could only refer to an electric ducted fan, so it works as a descriptor.

  • @Kombivar
    @Kombivar Рік тому +74

    Big congratulations for pulling off such graceful and elegant design into the light, absolutely delightful to watch, looks like a fun to fly as well. The future sky is yours.

    • @outlawcustoms132
      @outlawcustoms132 Рік тому +1

      Till it get shot out to the sky near Texas

    • @Kombivar
      @Kombivar Рік тому +1

      @@outlawcustoms132 Dang, completely forgot about that, need a special "No Fly Zone In Case Of Ranchers Calling It UFO And Attempt To Shoot Down" :D (Already you gave away too much fuel for comedians :D)

    • @virginiamoss7045
      @virginiamoss7045 Рік тому

      Well, the future sky is theirs if only one of those craft are in operation. How will we manage those skies if there are hundreds of them zipping here, there and in and out?

    • @Kombivar
      @Kombivar Рік тому

      @@virginiamoss7045 Probably the same way we manage traffic on the roads, although without traffic jams.

    • @virginiamoss7045
      @virginiamoss7045 Рік тому

      @@Kombivar Roads are two-dimensional; these marvels are three-dimensional, not at all the same.

  • @MayimHastings
    @MayimHastings Рік тому +7

    This is so exciting! Love it, great job 👏 And my goodness, the terrain was stunning, too!

  • @D0li0
    @D0li0 Рік тому +12

    That's just awesome to watch.

  • @Mrasdwin
    @Mrasdwin Рік тому +8

    Been checking everyday for updates for months. Finally the waiting is worth it. Good to see you guys again.

    • @stargazer7644
      @stargazer7644 Рік тому +1

      Now all they need are impossible physics so they can scale this up.

    • @Mrasdwin
      @Mrasdwin Рік тому

      @@stargazer7644 Let's look forward to get on that magnificent level of travelling

    • @stargazer7644
      @stargazer7644 Рік тому +1

      @@Mrasdwin It's going to take a lot more than hope and wishes to make this thing a reality.

    • @Mrasdwin
      @Mrasdwin Рік тому +1

      @@stargazer7644 It is. I'd like to be the part of making this thing into reality

  • @macartancaughey9993
    @macartancaughey9993 Рік тому +73

    Wow that Jet took of brilliantly flew like a dream and landed better that a bird a totally brilliant demonstration from start to finish it was fantastic. Well done guys 😁👍

    • @scottstdenis2929
      @scottstdenis2929 Рік тому

      I'm thinking of all the computer simulation that it took before they even took to the sky. More than likely still very nervous who ever was flying it. Sounded awesome too.

    • @perry92964
      @perry92964 Рік тому

      it all looks like that till it goes horribly wrong. im referring the the flying car that was in a bond film.

  • @armoureddiver5262
    @armoureddiver5262 Рік тому +227

    Great flight and beautifully stable and controlled landing. Although titled full transition the canard always seemed to be deflected some 20 -30 degrees and did not achieve laminar flow over the engine pod in forward flight. The constant movement also seemed to indicate that this is the primary pitch control surface. Does this reduce efficiency, especially in this most power hungry phase of flight?

    • @spartanslaxwax
      @spartanslaxwax Рік тому +8

      My overarching concern is really with the performance in high DA settings. It doesn't seem like it will perform super well in its current iteration

    • @KKSHS11
      @KKSHS11 Рік тому +7

      Yes, I concur.

    • @nyacfoox9853
      @nyacfoox9853 Рік тому +30

      Ooga booga

    • @clivemitchell3229
      @clivemitchell3229 Рік тому +1

      Nose heavy.

    • @FTATF
      @FTATF Рік тому +10

      The tell tales were running pretty straight for a little bit there. The problem was that most of the flight was take-off and landing.

  • @seymour8282
    @seymour8282 Рік тому +125

    Amazing! 112 mph and straight strings. Well done Lilium.

    • @dougaltolan3017
      @dougaltolan3017 Рік тому +21

      I must have missed that bit, never saw straight strings on the canards.

    • @jannikweisser
      @jannikweisser Рік тому +13

      @@dougaltolan3017 1:28 min

    • @dougaltolan3017
      @dougaltolan3017 Рік тому +21

      @@jannikweisser Ahh, thanks, I must have blinked.
      Shame that this video dosent show that as a stable, maintained state, as the title suggests.

    • @Phyde4ux
      @Phyde4ux Рік тому +4

      hopefully that isn't the upper end of it's envelope.

    • @bashkillszombies
      @bashkillszombies Рік тому +2

      Did we watch the same video?

  • @AdamTizzdall
    @AdamTizzdall Рік тому +7

    Wow the work you guys are doing is awe inspiring! I hope to fly one of these some day!

  • @spikekavalench
    @spikekavalench Рік тому +9

    Love it! Congratulations on another successful flight!

  • @antonnym214
    @antonnym214 Рік тому +62

    This is a beautiful piece of engineering, truly the achievement of a lifetime. We're super proud of what you have accomplished! Flight durations will improve also, as batteries improve. Very exciting days ahead!

    • @wildwilco
      @wildwilco Рік тому +6

      Batteries are currently at a limit. With lithium being the best chemical for batteries out there, it has a limit of charge per mass of lithium.
      So unless we find a new magical element that can hold more charge.... don't get your hopes up about range. Only way to improve range is more batteries

    • @kartyl1wielki
      @kartyl1wielki Рік тому

      Are you their parent to be proud of them?

    • @123Andersonev
      @123Andersonev 10 місяців тому

      @@wildwilco Aluminium, 3 times the ions of lithium and it's abundant.

    • @wildwilco
      @wildwilco 10 місяців тому

      @@123Andersonev yet nobody makes aluminium batteries...
      its nickel cadmium, lead acid, lithium (polymer/ion).
      solid metal batteries is something we allready tested, and they never have the capacity, or the power output.

    • @123Andersonev
      @123Andersonev 10 місяців тому

      @@wildwilco there's a company in Australia already on it, but yes they aren't mainstream yet, you can get aluminium button batteries already.

  • @finnschenck4055
    @finnschenck4055 Рік тому +4

    Splendid!!! I pray for the team's continued success.

  • @HarvickOne
    @HarvickOne Рік тому +22

    well done! big milestone towards the future of short range air travel

    • @waynejones6144
      @waynejones6144 Рік тому

      Yeah, short range is what this thing really excels in, Lol!

  • @vik98
    @vik98 Рік тому +11

    Looks amazing, congrats on your progress! :)

  • @ChopinLover
    @ChopinLover Рік тому +2

    Very nice and quick take off and landing! The acceleration to maximum speed was very impressive and astounding!

  • @veritylove212
    @veritylove212 Рік тому +10

    I can't wait to ride in a Lilium!! Beautiful landing!

  • @KeithWW
    @KeithWW Рік тому +27

    Great to see the progress! Thanks for sharing

  • @_onesimpleidea
    @_onesimpleidea Рік тому +12

    Very impressive, and what a landing!

  • @Neilazbiker
    @Neilazbiker Рік тому +17

    Nice!!! Looks like fun. The transitions look great. Very smooth and stable.

  • @chriswalker4636
    @chriswalker4636 Рік тому +6

    Just amazing! Continue working the plan - its working.

  • @renaissancesurfer7829
    @renaissancesurfer7829 Рік тому +7

    Lilium you’re going to rule the skies!

  • @arborealsquid2380
    @arborealsquid2380 Рік тому +5

    Congrats, great to see more progress!

  • @MishMash22
    @MishMash22 Рік тому +8

    That looks amazing. The takeoff and landing were smooth as butter!

  • @ismaelmatamoros9546
    @ismaelmatamoros9546 Рік тому +6

    This is massive!

  • @AdrianRodriguezWebDevelopment
    @AdrianRodriguezWebDevelopment Рік тому +5

    the landing was smooth

  • @nvpatentlawyer
    @nvpatentlawyer Рік тому +2

    First class engineering. And a perfect flight. Congratulations.

  • @brjones27
    @brjones27 Рік тому +1

    Amazing. Love it. I'd bulge out the top area where the motors are. Maximize lift. My fav concept right now. Love you guys.

  • @mikeytrw
    @mikeytrw Рік тому +2

    Round of applause! Well done guys.

  • @jaxrax21
    @jaxrax21 Рік тому +6

    Kudos! All in all a miraculous achievement.

  • @aounallahbrahim1024
    @aounallahbrahim1024 Рік тому

    thanks for keeping us posted on the progress

  • @ThalassTKynn
    @ThalassTKynn Рік тому +4

    This is really impressive! Good on you guys

  • @FPVREVIEWS
    @FPVREVIEWS Рік тому +53

    Wishing the team all the best gong forward!! Great progress!

    • @DriesDD
      @DriesDD Рік тому +3

      And all the best in turning as well!!

    • @erepsekahs
      @erepsekahs Рік тому

      I'm giving it a best gong forward also.

  • @robmedina4631
    @robmedina4631 Рік тому +6

    The master piece! 🎊 🎉 Congratulations

  • @greggelliott4985
    @greggelliott4985 Рік тому

    That looked fantastic! I just recently purchased some Lilium stock. Good luck in your endeavors. Cheers!

  • @7777benny
    @7777benny Рік тому

    always nice to see new companys that arnt the old guys makeing changes to things. Great job!

  • @user-if1bb2jh3e
    @user-if1bb2jh3e Рік тому +6

    Congratulations to lilium team 👍

  • @joebender557
    @joebender557 Рік тому +16

    What an unbelievable aircraft I love it what a great soft touchdown

  • @gaius_enceladus
    @gaius_enceladus Рік тому +12

    Great stuff!
    I love this aircraft - so quiet too! Very cool!

  • @stephensmith799
    @stephensmith799 Рік тому +1

    The laminar flow over the wing is excellent. More to do on the canards, but very, very impressive👍

  • @xjet
    @xjet Рік тому +235

    How efficient can this be when, even at 175Kph in level flight, the airflow over the front propulsion naceles is turbulent (stalled)? That's a massive amount of induced drag.

    • @stargazer7644
      @stargazer7644 Рік тому +22

      They were stalled because they were still thrusting down at high AOA

    • @xjet
      @xjet Рік тому +56

      @@stargazer7644 At 170Kph in forward flight I would expect a much lower AOA (ie: unstalled) for efficient flight. It seemed that because they were relying on thrust vectoring for pitch control using the canard the airflow was very rarely laminar over those front engine nacelles.

    • @stargazer7644
      @stargazer7644 Рік тому +16

      @@xjet Yes, I agree. The front canards really don't seem to have much lifting surface. I don't think they're going fast enough to have much control authority with all of the nacelles pointing backward.

    • @bradkubota6968
      @bradkubota6968 Рік тому +49

      This design will glide about as well as the space shuttle. Also NOT A JET.

    • @auspiciouslywild
      @auspiciouslywild Рік тому +42

      @@bradkubota6968 Regular passenger jet planes are not actually jets either, with the bypass ratio we have now a days. There's no point being pedantic about it. There's the colloquial "jet airplane" and actual "jet airplanes" and if you don't know enough about airplanes to know the difference, which is most people, it really doesn't matter what you call it anyway.

  • @motoflyte
    @motoflyte Рік тому +4

    Of all the 'flying car' designs, I like this one best

    • @waynejones6144
      @waynejones6144 Рік тому

      This thing is not a flying car, it's an overrated drone.

  • @1nePercentJuice
    @1nePercentJuice Рік тому +1

    I wasn't expecting how relaxing this video was going to be.

  • @chrismaggio7879
    @chrismaggio7879 Рік тому

    So used to hearing military controllers barking commands or info to pilots I was almost lulled to sleep listening to this guy gently give input to the pilot. Was a great video and I'm pleased to see this aircraft move closer to being in a sales showroom!

  • @kensbar9311
    @kensbar9311 Рік тому +74

    Outstanding flight, guys. Bravo!

    • @bashkillszombies
      @bashkillszombies Рік тому +2

      Did you watch a different video to me? All I saw were canards in complete stall at 170 kph - this thing has the glide profile of a rock, and that many electric motors just means more things to go wrong. This 'aircraft' will kill people, mark my words.

    • @whataloadofbollox
      @whataloadofbollox Рік тому +2

      @@bashkillszombies you should've been there when Wright brothers were doing their thing, your "advice" would've been invaluable to them, mark my words, WAC !

    • @dr.wallacebreen3859
      @dr.wallacebreen3859 Рік тому

      @@bashkillszombies if it was so dangerous as you said, something would've gone wrong immediately in this video, don't all aircrafts kill people when they crash?

    • @solomonshv
      @solomonshv Рік тому

      @@bashkillszombies thanks for your input. let us know how your electric plane is doing

    • @ALC656
      @ALC656 Рік тому

      @@dr.wallacebreen3859 something is obviously wrong when you see an aircraft of this size can’t aerodynamically balance at that velocity (and without a payload). In this video, the canards are trying to balance the aircraft by a brute force thrusting downward instead of its aerodynamic surfaces doing their job during cruise. Hence proving the vehicle is unstable and makes bashprompts comment somewhat valid

  • @willykang1293
    @willykang1293 Рік тому +58

    It’s a promising future. You guys rock.🎉

    • @lahillsm3
      @lahillsm3 Рік тому +4

      Rich people hovering above the chaos... ahhh the future!

    • @bashkillszombies
      @bashkillszombies Рік тому +3

      Did you watch a different video to me? All I saw were canards in complete stall at 170 kph - this thing has the glide profile of a rock, and that many electric motors just means more things to go wrong. This 'aircraft' will kill people, mark my words.

    • @lahillsm3
      @lahillsm3 Рік тому +1

      @@bashkillszombies Yeah, I saw the same video you did... with the really cool airplane. I still think the future is going to be dogshit.

    • @shaynejenkins446
      @shaynejenkins446 Рік тому +1

      This is some rich dudes toy. it isn't getting past that ever

    • @lahillsm3
      @lahillsm3 Рік тому

      @@shaynejenkins446 But the future will have canards! Canaaards!!

  • @Mikowmer
    @Mikowmer Рік тому +40

    By having your control surfaces combined with your thrust, it's very clear that it gives you an incredible amount of control, and allows for a very easy transitional phase of flight where you're not quite fast enough for all lift to come from your wings. While I initially wasn't convinced by that many engines being on an aircraft (more things that can go wrong, despite the extra redundancy), I can see that your design does have it's advantages.

    • @shadowmistress999
      @shadowmistress999 Рік тому +1

      the fact it has a "wing" gives me sense of security: if anything went wrong just turn off them and glide

    • @gackerman99
      @gackerman99 Рік тому +5

      hey, this guy wasn't initially convinced. you gotta work harder to convince Mikowmer on youtube comments. come on now.

    • @koka3243
      @koka3243 Рік тому +2

      These engines being electric means orders of magnitude reduction of complexity and chance of errors.

    • @rossnolan7283
      @rossnolan7283 Рік тому +1

      The converse is that by combining your control surfaces with your thrust you LOSE all control (and sustentation -ie 'anti gravity' forces ) when you lose power - and you then 'plummet' like a stone (to quote black adder 'the usual procedure,then, is to accelerate at 32 feet per second per second until meeting the surface and then distribute yourself over a considerable area of the countryside") The complete flow separation over vast areas of the canard and wings would normally precede a violent roll off and loss of control,spin etc but in this case NOTHING - indicating that the whole thing is 'flying' on sheer brute force provided by the fans inside the ducts . Something like a total of 3000 horsepower is quoted (each fan being something like 100 HP - ONE of which should be about enough to fly an empty aircraft of this size at much higher speeds . An incredible feat indeed - to have so much power thrashing away but still only stagger around at miserable speeds making a godawful racket and turmoil . An amazing achievement (only possible because of those huge airbrake flaps in fact )

    • @Mikowmer
      @Mikowmer Рік тому

      @@rossnolan7283 I was about to disagree with your assessment, then realised that you're correct.
      However there are things preventing that failure condition (complete loss of thrust in all engines). For one, the redundency of the engines makes losing all engines at once due to engine issues highly unlikely. Secondly, there should be a redundent power supply onboard in case of main power supply failure which will mitigate that possible failure, similarly with redundent control systems.
      In addition, just because the application of the principle is flawed in this scenario doesn't make it invalid. By integrating your thrust source into your control surfaces can help with control as you now have directional thrust. It's just that you shouldn't integrate your control surface into the thrust source (i.e. there should be some control surface that, even if it's the same control surface as the engine has been integrated into, still acts as a traditional control surface).

  • @bruceyoung1343
    @bruceyoung1343 Рік тому

    AWESOME GREAT FLIGHT. So happy to see improvements

  • @MayuriK_it
    @MayuriK_it Рік тому +5

    Congrats Lilium team for this goal!

  • @SAG1028
    @SAG1028 Рік тому +5

    🎉yesss a full transition, that’s what’s up. You go Lilium.

  • @anadverb5063
    @anadverb5063 Рік тому +1

    Outstanding! Amazing engineering!

  • @TS.island01
    @TS.island01 8 місяців тому +1

    Great job, keep improving.

  • @SebastianKlemm
    @SebastianKlemm Рік тому +3

    looks really clean! good job team !

  • @rolandmdill
    @rolandmdill Рік тому +3

    Amazing achievement, congrats!

  • @alexwirtz
    @alexwirtz Рік тому

    Very, very cool. Congratulations on the successful test, looks really promising...

  • @AngeloXification
    @AngeloXification Рік тому +2

    I wish this team all the best!

  • @Jannikheu
    @Jannikheu Рік тому +8

    Looks super stable, genius work!!

  • @lylerodericks
    @lylerodericks Рік тому +2

    Beautiful aircraft! Kudos team!

  • @faluffel
    @faluffel Рік тому +1

    Amazing flight demonstration! Really looking forward to production model in flight test

  • @ZoidPickle
    @ZoidPickle Рік тому

    Interesting design, very
    Smooth flight, and landing.
    Test pilots job is so cool.
    Keep us updated, nice1. 👍

  • @MarsStarcruiser
    @MarsStarcruiser Рік тому +3

    Such a pleasantly stable landing. Hope this design takes off👍

  • @seanavery7265
    @seanavery7265 Рік тому +6

    Congratulations to you all.✈️⭐

  • @jonathanredfearn5937
    @jonathanredfearn5937 Рік тому

    Congratulations!!!! Looking great!

  • @jayf.1312
    @jayf.1312 Рік тому +1

    Lilium Jet: f-a-n-t-a-s-t-i-c. Congratulations!!!!!!

  • @mdpb3000
    @mdpb3000 Рік тому +90

    You guys are awesome! Already prepared my newly built house (GER-85375) with a roof strong enough so a Lillium Jet can land there 🥰😎

    • @tiutran2610
      @tiutran2610 Рік тому +2

      Adding a verified charger would be great, tho at first they only operate at their own Airport/Vertiport.

    • @kab3d3bmw
      @kab3d3bmw Рік тому +4

      Sweet move, I have followed lilium for some time now and is my #1 choice just not financially in a place where I can make things like that happen.

    • @helmutpohl2762
      @helmutpohl2762 Рік тому +6

      ...and I am putting a piece of sugar in the window and hope, a stork will find it ....... and so on ....Marc, - continue dreaming .....

    • @kab3d3bmw
      @kab3d3bmw Рік тому +4

      @@helmutpohl2762 VTOL tech has been used since what the 80's so you think it's that far off when a guy can make a bathtub fly using drone tech?

    • @Melanie16040
      @Melanie16040 Рік тому +9

      @@kab3d3bmw VTOL isn't the problem... Doing it with batteries and having any sort of useful range or payload capacity on the other hand...

  • @dalequammie937
    @dalequammie937 Рік тому +32

    great progress guys...congrats to the team

  • @stepphun
    @stepphun Рік тому

    👏Congrats & Amazing to see the progress.

  • @Sphyxx
    @Sphyxx Рік тому

    I just love the sound of the radio talk

  • @dtoften
    @dtoften Рік тому +8

    The flight controls are the rotation and thrust of each four ducted fans groups. Any redundancy with these controls?

  • @terminalblue
    @terminalblue Рік тому +7

    Love the combo of KM/H and FT/MIN

    • @RandalLSchwartz
      @RandalLSchwartz Рік тому

      Welcome to the wonderful world of aviation units. :)

    • @vaughnbay
      @vaughnbay Рік тому

      I couldn't agree more....They're flying the thing in imperial knots and feet, it's right in the audio and they are in Spain for gods sake. But displaying metric Klicks on their website. In 60 years of flying the free world I have never heard ATC ask for an airspeed in Klicks or an altitude in meters. And having been around airplanes for better than 70 years I have never seen an airspeed indicator graduated in Klicks or an altimeter graduated in meters, IN THE FREE WORLD. Who landed on the moon first? There was not one metric nut or bolt on Apollo 11. LOOSE the metric system! Let the Russians have it.

  • @steveraby6023
    @steveraby6023 Рік тому

    Wow !!, a very stable flight that looked very well controlled.

  • @generalzod7959
    @generalzod7959 Рік тому

    Cool stuff, neat-looking aircraft.

  • @kkolomoisky
    @kkolomoisky Рік тому +53

    Very interesting video with the amazing progress! Could you add battery status or at least rate of discharge to see the difference between hover and forward flight.

    • @nicevideomancanada
      @nicevideomancanada Рік тому +1

      1/11th

    • @JamesNewton
      @JamesNewton Рік тому

      @@nicevideomancanada Source?

    • @nicevideomancanada
      @nicevideomancanada Рік тому

      @@JamesNewton 1/10th. ua-cam.com/video/qZ73PftBfFg/v-deo.html

    • @nicevideomancanada
      @nicevideomancanada Рік тому

      1/10th. ua-cam.com/video/qZ73PftBfFg/v-deo.html

    • @yeahrightbear8883
      @yeahrightbear8883 Рік тому +13

      If they did that it might scare off investors. Lol. These companies never give out the info that actually matters.

  • @carldavis391
    @carldavis391 Рік тому +13

    That was so awesome 😎✌️
    Go TEAM LILIUM..The world leaders in the future of air mobility...🌏🛸💚

  • @randallmacdonald4851
    @randallmacdonald4851 Рік тому

    That was awesome. Great going Lilium!!!

  • @jacobaltland4832
    @jacobaltland4832 Рік тому

    Congrats on the transition.

  • @jeffarnim
    @jeffarnim Рік тому +4

    This is astounding! Completely Jetsons no exposed propellers. Love it!

  • @Kakeyoro
    @Kakeyoro Рік тому +17

    The approach gave me chills. Spectacular.

    • @DevJB
      @DevJB Рік тому

      I was yelling at my monitor 'tip up!' but then it went to scene 2 showing he did have plenty of time and distance and needed that speed to get over there.. Radome ok, if it has one. lol : ) 👍
      Looked flawless.

  • @oliverdots
    @oliverdots Рік тому

    What a beautiful looking aircraft!

  • @mikewilliams235
    @mikewilliams235 Рік тому

    That's pretty cool. Well done guys.

  • @JPDB7
    @JPDB7 Рік тому +13

    Congrats, Lillium! I’m an investor and it makes me happy to see the progress you are making! Keep on keepin’ on! 🍀🤞🏻

    • @MrINKOMPATIBEL
      @MrINKOMPATIBEL Рік тому

      ......climbing into a jetson flying home, ordering a black fly. 😂

    • @lehsu
      @lehsu Рік тому

      Seems much quieter than drone type with their propellers. Is it so and how is this noise reduction achieved?

  • @fareedmohyuddin
    @fareedmohyuddin Рік тому +4

    Amazing, more power to you guys!

  • @keenang8592
    @keenang8592 Рік тому +1

    Awesome watching the future of transportation!!!

  • @braeburnhilliard8340
    @braeburnhilliard8340 Рік тому +1

    Wow, that was really cool!

  • @LarperCletus
    @LarperCletus Рік тому +3

    My biggest concern with this design would be glide ratio. If you have complete engine loss, you have a lot of drag on top of the wings. It seems like that would be like having massive spoilers constantly raised, which would dramatically change the wing chord.
    I would be really interested to see wind tunnel results of the wing with engines off.

  • @Aldoborzoni
    @Aldoborzoni Рік тому +10

    That is the most amazing and exciting plane I've seen in my life. Great job. Congratulations!

    • @TC-kf9zw
      @TC-kf9zw Рік тому

      🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

  • @tysonisham
    @tysonisham Рік тому

    Congrats 🎉 that was awesome! Now 👏 please 👏 don’t 👏 stop 👏 iterating 👏

  • @doyouliketacos7809
    @doyouliketacos7809 Рік тому

    Great job ....this will be the future of personal air travel

  • @mattcero1
    @mattcero1 Рік тому +3

    Ok, what's the downside? Range? Flight duration? Payload? Recharge time? How do the electronics/engines do flying through rain? You have to start somewhere and they're certainly doing it here for sure but I went to their site and couldn't get any of the above information.

  • @andybogart2503
    @andybogart2503 Рік тому +8

    Beautiful flying sculpture. I’m ready to order mine!

    • @TheCyberMantis
      @TheCyberMantis Рік тому

      You must be rich!

    • @shaynejenkins446
      @shaynejenkins446 Рік тому +1

      Its ugly and is gonna kill people. But its never goin past just being a rich dudes toy. So no you wont be ordering one.

  • @GetToThePointAlready
    @GetToThePointAlready Рік тому +1

    Actually looks fantastic. Great job. Much better than those clickbait videos where the aircraft is just a glorified quad drone.

  • @dmeemd7787
    @dmeemd7787 Рік тому

    Amazing work!!