For the last question, part a asks to describe the correlation so would you not have to give a worded description in the context of the problem? You just said "strong positive correlation". Thank you so much again
If it asks you to interpret, then I’d give context. But it literally just wants the correlation to be described, so that’s why I went with this. If I were you and in an exam, I’d say both things to be doubly sure!
you know for the last question part c, can we write that there is a causal relationship because theres more traffic to get to the restaurant or do we always have to contradict the question and say that theres no causal relationship
You could attempt that, but usually if they don’t seem related it’s better to say that they’re not directly related. There might be some traffic, but it’s unlikely that there’s that many additional cars to travel to fast food places, I don’t think.
Hi Sir, for the example question you did about causal relationships at 7:34, is everything you have written required for the marks, or is just the second half enough?
Breezing through these playlists
Same😂
You are probably the best a level Maths teacher on UA-cam you've helped me immensely thank you
Wow, what a kind thing to say - thank you!
thank you for this! has helped me understand this topic as i am in year 2 doing year 2 stats now and needed this!
You’re welcome 😃
YEAR 2?!!
this video helped me get to sleep!
Me too, thanks a lot for the schleeping tips btw Sleep Therapy NL - as a fellow bodybuilder your excellent tutorial was incredibly helpful
@@dwaynefacts2207 ????????????
hey bicen do you have like a slideshow of exam questions on percific topics for apllied like u got for pure
Yep there’s a link to my Google Drive on my homepage where you can find it under Exam Questions by Topic!
did you create these questions sir?
For the last question, part a asks to describe the correlation so would you not have to give a worded description in the context of the problem? You just said "strong positive correlation". Thank you so much again
If it asks you to interpret, then I’d give context. But it literally just wants the correlation to be described, so that’s why I went with this. If I were you and in an exam, I’d say both things to be doubly sure!
2:16 Ah yes might want to re-read the x-axis on that one!
Wowww this is so stupid on my part here 😂 I’m so embarrassed now haha
you know for the last question part c, can we write that there is a causal relationship because theres more traffic to get to the restaurant or do we always have to contradict the question and say that theres no causal relationship
You could attempt that, but usually if they don’t seem related it’s better to say that they’re not directly related. There might be some traffic, but it’s unlikely that there’s that many additional cars to travel to fast food places, I don’t think.
@@BicenMaths i see, thanks alot 💕💕💕
Hi Sir, for the example question you did about causal relationships at 7:34, is everything you have written required for the marks, or is just the second half enough?
Just the second part should be enough!
@@BicenMaths thanks for replying
Maths is so much fun.
Bivariate data
Explanatory
Response
Causal relationship
👍🏻