What Did Ham ACTUALLY Do To Noah That Caused Canaan To Be Cursed?-MOST BIBLICAL ANSWER |
Вставка
- Опубліковано 10 лип 2024
- Original livestream: ua-cam.com/users/livekG-iq7ir...
Like videos like this? Check out a playlist here:
Bible Questions ANSWERED!
• Bible Questions ANSWERED!
Timestamps:
0:00 Sam reads the passage (Genesis 9)
1:37 The first way to interpret the text: Ham mocked his father, but this doesn’t make sense in light of the curse of Canaan
2:45 Start of the second interpretation: What does uncover the nakedness of your father” mean? [This will blow you away]
7:07 Then why curse Canaan, and not Ham?
10:03 Was this fair to Canaan? - Розваги
Like videos like this? Then check out a playlist here: Bible Questions ANSWERED!
ua-cam.com/play/PLaj7w5VChwna2hj1i7bK6Qk69zQ6KJkDV.html
I have to disagree with this account of this explanation because it seems Noah cursed because of shame or the possible lack of respect Ham showed to him as his father by looking on his nakedness.It's the same literal situation as to whom Jesus really is? Whether he is literally a separate God to the Almighty God or literally the Most High God himself or literally like the God and Father himself? Revelations reveals Jesus will receive a scroll literally from the right hand of God someday but until then JC remains the Son seated at the right hand of God (Psalm 110) who btw also determines who sits at JC's right and left according to Jesus himself.Mark 10:40
Ham had a massive penis and black body and laughed at his dads white body and small penis
Shem Brown small willy
Japheth white small willy
All jealous of ham so they deleted him from history starting 1500bc in Egypt then later finished then off at canaan
Ham saw his dad's white naked body and small willy
Shem Brown small willy
Japheth white small willy
All jealous of ham because ham had a black body and massive willy
so they kicked him out of Egypt then later finished him off in canaan
I'm an incest survivor and I had seen that interpretation when I read it. Because of my experience I knew what I was looking at. I prayed about it because it worried me but I knew in my heart that Ham had slept with his mother... I'm so glad that someone else has seen it too. The whole story explains to me why God is so angry that it was done to me. It also explains why God is so kind to me and listens to me when I'm screaming in agony at the memory of it. God uses our past experiences to learn his truths and to show us why God's ways are so much better for us than the ways of our ancestors... Pray about it and see what God has to say you just might be surprised. God bless you all very much!
Ham slept with Noah, that's what the text implies, hence the curse.
@@cristovieneya8997 Ham slept with Noah's wife, that is what the text implies. It's like you didn't listen or read Moses's use of the term "do not see your blood relative's nakedness". Noah was not alone "drunk and naked", he was with his wife and Ham's mother. Ham slept with his mother when he found her drunk and naked beside Noah. Leviticus 18:8 "You shall not uncover the nakedness of your father 's wife; it is your father 's nakedness"
@marthajones1086 I too am a victim of incest via SRA through my grandparents and their church. I was trafficked through their church starting when I was 2. They did rituals to install demons in me and forced me to participate in human sacrifice. I have since been delivered from these demons, but for decades I suffered too with nightmares over it. These rituals involved terrible traumas that would make me forget what happened but the demons installed were controlling my life, they caused terrible anger, major anxiety and a false understanding of salvation. They are like parasites of the mind, putting thoughts in my head. I was afraid all the time. I developed many health problems because of them.
Then I found someone who was able to deliver me of these demons and teach me about the true path to Salvation and when I became born again, I was healed from the pain, from the rage, and fear. I had been praying for a long time for God to help me with all my pain and God led me to this person. I am now at peace, and peaceful. We did what the Apostles were doing using the Name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth. His name is Marion Knox, hes 87 and has had a deliverance ministry for over 45 years. He does not charge for this service nor does he record any of it. I pray you find peace and are able to escape the past.
@@KingSardius Leviticus 18:7 gives the definition of uncovering your fathers nakedness OR your mothers nakedness. It says your mothers nakedness is her nakedness. It says this in Bible versions that came from the Protestant Reformation--ALL SEVEN OF THEM including the King James Bible. Verse 8 of Lev 18 is talking about other wives of your father, not your mother. The modern Bible versions confuse this issue because they want to hide the sin of sodomy.
@@maineiax "The modern Bible versions" do not hide anything, you are speaking about the translators. The sin of sodomy is condemned in the law of Moses, and in all translations of the Bible. The Bible revisions are done to bring corrections, to re-evaluate the meaning of text, and to update words used for a translation based on current language usage. So yes, 3 revisions of the King James Bible say a lot. And having more Biblical text resources (like the Dead Sea Scrolls) makes all the difference. You are stuck on fallacies. Leviticus 18:8 "You shall not uncover the nakedness of your father 's wife; it is your father 's nakedness", and Noah had only one wife at the time.
This is amazing about “ the nakedness of Noah”. I have never heard a preacher expand on this before.
I’m 66 years and been a Christian since I was 22, and never heard this before!
This problem is endemic in pentecostal churches. The religions which are cult have a syllabus to brainwash their members the protestants failed from start the reason we christian can't defend our faith strongly .The teachers of today seem not even bothered. Look at How the book of Revelation is never taught being the book of our time. Good thing if you seek you find how we got here. Jeep the faith.
I don't think that's correct he's assuming Noah cursed Caanan years later once he was born. When the bible makes it clear Caanan already existed when Noah cursed him. He cursed Caanan not Ham because the Lord already Blessed Ham and you can't curse what the Lord already blessed. But if you want to believe Ham had sex with his Mother and produced Caanan that's fine. Why would Noah being naked be mentioned and not the mother at all? It seems odd.
The modern Bible versions are copyrighted. This means with each new edition, the owner has to change the Word of God per the copyright laws of men. The King James 1611 Bible wording is not copyrighted which means with each new edition the words of God have to stay the same and have since 1611. If charts, dictionaries or study notes are added, those could be copyrighted but the words have to stay the same, being preserved since the Protestant Reformation. Because of copyright laws, modern Bible versions can be full of inconsistencies and even contradictions. Read Lev 18 in the King James and it clearly says that Ham had unlawful sex with Noah, not his mother. It clearly defines what seeing the nakedness of different individuals are unlike the version read from in this video which like many other modern versions tries to hide unlawful sex between men.
@@maineiax LEV 18:8The nakedness of thy father's wife shalt thou not uncover: it is thy father's nakedness.
@@maineiax The King James Version was copyrighted when first published. In fact, to this day, the KJV is still under copyright protection in the United Kingdom. The existence of a copyright is meaningless in determining the quality of a translation. And, even if the existence of a copyright mattered, the King James Version is, in fact, copyrighted.
I understand you have always used KJV and you believe that's the word of God not the Greek and Hebrew manuscripts. You guys get carried away. I used to be KJV myself but its so much more difficult to really understand. God certainly wants people to understand what their reading.
It's nice to finally hear a preacher who understands the meaning of "uncovering... nakedness" and bringing citations to prove it.
@@ritcheymt this is because Sam knows you have little bible knowledge and takes advantage of it. Now Leviticus 18:7,8
7 The nakedness of thy father, even the nakedness of thy mother, shalt thou not uncover: she is thy mother; thou shalt not uncover her nakedness.
8 The nakedness of thy father’s wife shalt thou not uncover: it is thy father’s nakedness.
Now notice it was specific and direct about the father's nakedness. Then it says the nakedness of thy father's wife NOWHERE IN THE ACCOUNT DOES IT SAY IT IS THE NAKEDNESS OF NOAHS WIFE DOES IT. IT DOES AT THE END BUT YOU MISSED EVERYTHING ELSE do not listen to Sam EVER!
@@jont39 Thanks for the comment, but I'm not sure I understand your point. Are you saying that Ham saw his father naked but didn't have sex with his mother and that therefore Canaan was not produced from an incestuous union between Ham and his mother?
Also the brothers had to find a garment to cover , the brothers were without ,
What were they without?
I wonder if Ham also stole Noah's Garment. Was the garment the sheep skin that God made for Adam. That Noah inherited?
Nothing to support the interpretation of incest, not doctrine. Noah was drunk and naked.
The Lord is so good to even the vilest of humans. His mercies endure forever. I’m so full of joy to serve a God Who gives us many chances for redemption. He is long suffering.
Sin away makes u happy? Do u really need God for that? Are u really serving a holy God? What will he say to u when u stand before Him? I never knew u. U worker of iniquity. Psalm 5:5
@@preacherforjesuschrist.3806 you belong to/run a false church. My God is full of grace. We are in the dispensation of grace and are twisting my comment like satan does. You’re the one whom God will turn away, unless you repent. Attacking those who praise God for His goodness and grace is evil.
@@preacherforjesuschrist.3806Nothing in his comment implies "sin away it doesn't matter" unbelievable!
@@jilesbo9175 I have found "christians" to be the most unChristian in actions. Judging, gossiping, lying. But feel above heathens. We all have an Iniquity that God will find in us.
@@thurmandavide Did anyone say you can be sinless? Perfect is a target worth striving toward even if you don't achieve it in this life!
Don't worry about it boob! Just keep trying that's all that's expected😀😬😼
I am today years old and I have never heard this teaching! Thank you for bringing light to this scripture!
Thank you for walking us through this. Often, when reading the Bible, I think “wow, that’s harsh”... by now I have learned to acknowledge that I am simply not fully understanding. But learning the Bible deeper has never failed to remind me that I really know nothing.
Sorry, God does not give the clear explanation. I believe the wickedness was a preflood sin that Ham had in his heart. The reason why the Holy Spirit does not reveal the story is because we humans would be doing it as an addiction today or as a religious preflood demonic worship.
Honor your mother and father. Cover (forgive) those that have shamed instead of being slanderous and mocking them. help them. This goes even more into the spiritual sense. when people were in shame, they were always uncovered. left open.. our sons and daughters, and servents in the lords eyes, should be taught to forgive, cover their shame, help them, and honor them. I'd say the bible is a 2 fold instruction on what to do both in real life, and the unseen realm, where there are servants and a cloud of witnesses watching. This is what I've gathered from my researching. When you read the bible, you're not only instructing yourself, but the servants and angels assigned to you, that make you who you are and support your being and your relationship with God. This might be a bit too much meat for some people.
Lol I'm same way have been Christian many years and it's continually teaching me so much.peace to all
Yeah, amen to that!
@@diggyspiff4875 yes true!
This Completely blew my mind! I'd never heard this, not in Seminary nor 48 years a Christian. Inbred and child sacrifice. Wow! Those folks had real issues.....
yeah.. I've always had problems with this. the other interpretation asks us to add a story element that isn't here of Ham mocking Noah. It made it so I would read it and think he was being punished for not knowing some rule about nakedness. This is really amazing.
@@MicahMicahel And it's always been there. We just didn't see it
Caninites were part of the hybrids. Cain who killed able his father was the devil. According to the Talmud I thought ham castrated Noah.
A common idiom for uncovering your father‘s nakedness is sleeping with his wife, Ruben did just that, Canaan being the outcome of that unlawful union .
Very possibe.
And that is why Canaan was cursed and not ham the offspring of the incestuous relationship great Bible Study.
Canaan is the bloodline of Ham. Ruben is bloodline of Shem.
I heard Dr Michael Heiser talk about this as well
That would be the best explanation I've heard to date...
Wow. Let the Bible interpret the Bible. That makes so much sense. Mind blown
The bible is a 5th generation translation of a tertiary text.
3 opinions (at least) on top of all those translations... it's all nonsense used to stupefy & control ignorant populations.
Check out a channel called the gathering of yahsharel.
How does the Bible interpret itself what a silly thing to say. Only the infallible Magisterium of the holy Catholic Church can truly and infallibly interpret sacred scripture because the Bible is Catholic book and the protestant Bible is an incomplete and corrupted Catholic book which I’d rip up.
That is the first rule of hermeneutics
In Genesis 9 Verse 1 God had already blessed Ham. Noah could not curse him -
Genesis 9:1
“And God blessed Noah and his sons, and said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth.”
King James Version (KJV)
Good point.
God has given us His son whoever believes should not perish,''whoever'' is conditional.
So what happens to Incest,Adultery and
The fifth commandment says, “Honor your father and your mother, that your days may be long in the land that the Lord your God is giving you” (Exodus 20:12). This commandment, and the blessing attached to it, are repeated throughout the old and new testaments.
All the blessings of God carries both a curse an a blessing with both bad and good outcome depending on your response. Cf deut 28
You can indeed lose your blessing through sin! YHWH Blessed Israel many times and many times they fell from these blessings into curses.... Israel was blessed: Numb. 24:9, Gen. 12:3 - 49:9..... Israel lost their blessings and became cursed: Lev 26:14-45. Deut. 11:29 - 27:15-26. Even those that are under the BLOOD of Christ that are not obeying the Apostles teaches are under a curse: Mat. 7:13-23. Gal. 1:6-9).
This was interesting. I'm so glad that he didn't mention race, I am so tired of hearing that blacks were cursed because of Ham, smh
@@alonzowitt5931 True ,but God is merciful every time they came back to Him He forgave and healed them though the consequences remained.
Heard this teaching from Shepherd’s Chapel years ago…❤️🔥🙏🙏🙏❤️🔥
Hey, Shepherd's Chapel is on 24/7 live feed on YT and still putting forth truth.. absolutely no rapture..
2010 with them for me.
@@jennybrooks9027 that's because they use bullinger and strong green moffat . Old school.
I used to listen to Shepherds Chapel!
A clear, sensible, bible-based explanation. Thank you.
GLORY BE TO THE FATHER, TO THE SON, AND TO THE HOLY SPIRIT, ONE GOD ALMIGHTY. HALLELUJAH. AMEN.
Line upon line. Precept upon precept. Absolutely 💯 factual hermeneutics of the Scriptures🙏🏽💎👑🔑✨
Thank you for breaking this down so profoundly. Blessings to you 😇🙏🏽
The explanation of the second (Ham and the nakedness of Noah) is profoundly enlightening.❤
So great to hear someone get this one right!!! Way to go!!!
I've been saying this... that Ham committed incest with his own mother in order to assert dominance over his father and brothers... for years! Ever since I was 19, in fact. I'm 63 now. It's the truth, but far too many are too squeamish to concede to it.
Absolum did the same thing to David, when he tried to usurp power in David’s old age. He went in to David’s concubines and slept with them. He made no secret of it either, as it was a pagan way to take power from the leader.
You'd probably like the book by Carl Gallups entitled "God's of Ground Zero" which sheds a different light on what actually happened in the Garden...
That did not happen. Noah was naked, not his wife.
@francoliberti858 i just found last year that gen 4 says eve rode the serpent conveived cain
@@JustinSchoelen-yw8pd It doesn't say that at all. You're falling for lies from evil people.
OH...THE MERCY OF GOD!!! Remember LOT AND His Daughters!
I learned about something the other day in the book of machelzidek. That before God judged sodom and gammorah. That he offered the people to go to the river jordan and cleanse themselves of there sin and that nobody but just lot and his 2 daughters went to the river jordan and cleansed themselves.
Bringing forth Moab(Moabites) and Ammon(Ammonites) through Drunkenness. The difference is that the two daughters did it, not a son unto his Mother bringing forth Canaan setting the (Canaanites). Most all church leaders have set aside the truth of the curse unto them for not teaching the truth of all the matters unto the people. Now let us look why the Roman Catholic Church(4th Empire of Daniel 2) is celibate and have created a Name for themselves for the harm of Children that they have done. We do now know that other Christian Church preachers have done the same. This is the reason for not teaching the word of God in its full format that the children of God will be unknowledgable and easily allow a church leader to lead them to accept their Authority over them. This is why I left the Church and seen it as Witchcraft or Warlocking.
@@beckiwildeman600 My response was to the mercy and Grace of Our God....
Ive been telling people this for years and they laughed, rejected, and called me crazy. One can not just read the scriptures and assume the definitions of words. Use your Concordance and definitions! And it wasnt Canaan the person but the seed of Ham. Come on people!!
1 Corinthians 2:14 (ESV)
The natural person does not accept the things of the Spirit of God, for they are folly to him, and he is not able to understand them because they are spiritually discerned.
@@Dgunn2023 Yes, but look at what they did for centuries. No wonder The Lord didn't want the Israelites to take them as wives
YEP same here
I can certainly understand this except why then did hams brothers walk backwards to cover up their father?
@@ahm3096 because at that time, and I believe now as well, you weren't supposed to look upon the nakedness up to your 2/3rd cousin. Now it's normal! But not!
I have believed for a while that this is the true interpretation of that passage and makes a lot of sense
It's false.
Thank you for enlightening me. I never fully understood this part of the bible until now. All I knew was, a sin was committed, but I didn't think it was incest.
Edit: This is what my mother always tell me. Sins of the father needs to be overcome to break the curse.
Read the KJV as it says Ham had sex with Noah, not his mother.
The Lord Jesus Christ came and died for everybody if anybody repent or would they have done if they repent and turn from their wicked ways.
Lord Jesus Christ was the sacrificial lamb for the whole creation of humanity .
And yes we all carry generational sins going all the way back to Adam and Eve for being disobedient we can come in on up to the to the time now but once you receive Christ Jesus the the anointing of the Holy Spirit the blood of Jesus cleanse you from all condemnation and you and you need to stay and walk in that new life in Christ Jesus and do not go back to where you was at one time some people do fall back and go back don't do that.
Ham had six sons and their names are ,
Mizraim which is modern-day Egypt.
Put, Hittites, Amorites, Philistines,
Canaan -modern-day Palestinian
If you look in the book of Genesis 10 : 19
The Canaanites are still living in Gaza you will see Gaza right there in the 19th verse .
The modern Bible versions are copyrighted. This means with each new edition, the owner has to change the Word of God per the copyright laws of men. The King James 1611 Bible wording is not copyrighted which means with each new edition the words of God have to stay the same and have since 1611. If charts, dictionaries or study notes are added, those could be copyrighted but the words have to stay the same, being preserved since the Protestant Reformation. Because of copyright laws, modern Bible versions can be full of inconsistencies and even contradictions. Read Lev 18 in the King James and it clearly says that Ham had unlawful sex with Noah, not his mother. It clearly defines what seeing the nakedness of different individuals are unlike the version read from in this video which like many other modern versions tries to hide unlawful sex between men.
Leviticus 18 doesn't even mention Noah. It does talk about sexual morality.
This is my belief as well.
It explains why Caanan would be cursed by Noah.
Every time Noah looked at Caanan, his grandson AND stepson; He would be reminded of Ham's actions.
@@davidgraham2673 weird belief and unbliblical unless you want to add to God’s word which many itching teachers do now. Wouldn’t go there brother
@@gustavodeltoro5862 , Explain then why Noah would curse Caanan, and not Ham.
Not one single person has done that. In fact; I never hear from them again.
It makes no sense whatsoever to curse Caanan if all Ham did was to see his father naked.
It makes all the sense in the world if Ham slept with Noah's wife.
Someone had to be the first to commit incest.
Likely the Bible would also make mention of it, to provide a historical foundation for Leviticus which then points directly back to the sin, AND addresses why Canaanites strayed so far from God.
You admonish, but simply say "I wouldn't go there".
I never listen to that kind of a response.
Do better.
@@dustindustindontworry-jz8dh , One of my favorite verses in the Bible is God saying "Come, let us reason together".
This implies that if we use our reasoning ability logically, we can often find the correct interpretation of verses.
The Bible interprets the Bible.
I feel that Leviticus does just that concerning Ham's sin. Incest covers all the bases, and explains Noah's curse on Canaan, AND it also accounts for the deviant sexual sins seen in the Canaanites later on. The sins of the father affect the sons, and if we go deeper, the Nephilim make a return after the flood, and live WHERE?....
Yep, in Canaan. I think somehow this is because of Ham's sin.
I don't believe in coincidences.
Too much bad going on in Canaan after all this. I believe it's all comnected.
Just my opinion.
Also: This isn't a doctrinal issue that would keep one from salvation.
That's why I try not to be too argumentative.....
Thanks for your toughts.
I'm grateful.
That's a false teaching. Noah was naked, not his wife.
@@blain20_ , Not once has a responder explained properly WHY it was that Canaan was cursed rather than Ham.
God doesn't allow curses to simply be indiscriminately be uttered.
Do better.
Truth. I believe I learned this from LA Marzulli years ago. Great teaching! Hope many more will come to understand this. Praise Yeshua Yahweh the Almighty.
There is one God and one mediator between God and humanity....
Yahweh is God, Yeshua is the human mediator between Yahweh and humanity. They are 2 persons not the same person.
The Hebrew text is a lot more powerful than most can discern in the old testament. Like how Adam was said to be covering himself because he was naked would be more like:
"Fearing because naked, I am hiding"
Nakedness, so many words we use in English is sexually oriented. It's so much more powerful than that.
Finally FINALLY this makes so much sense.
Shabbath Shalom qodesh mishpacha!! All esteem to Abba YAHWEH b' YAHUSHUA ha' Mashiah!! HalleluYAH!! Amein!!
Wow! This deep dive is a blessing
So glad I watched this! Our Holy Bible truly is beautiful, thanks Sam! 😊
I used to believe the same thing until I researched Bible versions. The modern Bible versions are copyrighted. This means with each new edition, the owner has to change the Word of God per the copyright laws of men. The King James 1611 Bible wording is not copyrighted which means with each new edition the words of God have to stay the same and have since 1611. If charts, dictionaries or study notes are added, those could be copyrighted but the words have to stay the same, being preserved since the Protestant Reformation. Because of copyright laws, modern Bible versions can be full of inconsistencies and even contradictions. Read Lev 18 in the King James and it clearly says that Ham had unlawful sex with Noah, not his mother. It clearly defines what seeing the nakedness of different individuals are unlike the version read from in this video which like many other modern versions tries to hide unlawful sex between men.
Yes, agreed. KJV, 1611 is left pure and unchanged because it is not copyrighted, only the maps, reference notes, and appendix. It is the best English version, because it is unchanged.
About Leviticus 18, read vs 7 and 8. Both the father and the mother are also the father’s na *kedness. It also specifies the father’s wife as such since a father’s wife isn’t necessarily the son’s mother. But Noah did not have another wife other than the mother of his 3 sons at that time. But one can understand the mother would be the same as with another wife as well. So, I’ve always thought Ham was with both Noah and his mother, which would be the ultimate humiliation and dominant move to place himself as leader of the family over his father by the greatest humiliation. The child Canaan came from the act with Ham’s mother, and so it proved he was with both, and so the child bore a bitter curse for his father Ham’s actions. I could be wrong, but I think Ham was with both Noah and his mother, because as you read the chapter apparently Ham and Canaan, and the people of Canaan lay with everyone and anyone related to them closely or through marriage, even with animals. Like father like son I suppose.
@@BlueberryGirl723 It can be easy to miss when we hear someone tell it versus just looking at all the words as God wrote them in Lev 18:7. There was a time when I thought Ham slept with his mother and Canaan was the product of that union but it was because I heard it somewhere and then missed this one little word that made all the difference.
Lev 18:7 The nakedness of thy father, or the nakedness of thy mother, shalt thou not uncover: she is thy mother; thou shalt not uncover her nakedness.
The "or" word separates my fathers nakedness from my mothers nakedness then says that to do so is to uncover my mothers nakedness as her nakedness not his nakedness. This verse is basically saying each parent has their own nakedness and to uncover ones fathers nakedness is to have sex with ones father or to uncover ones mothers nakedness is to have sex with ones mother all due to the word "or" which is not the same as the word "and". If the word, "and" replaced the word "or" then we might be able to say our mothers nakedness was also our fathers nakedness.
Then in verse 8 we are talking about step mothers because mother was already covered (no pun intended) in verse 7.
Lev 18:8 The nakedness of thy father's wife shalt thou not uncover: it is thy father's nakedness.
Many men of that time had more than one wife. Abraham's first born Ishmael from the Egyptian servant woman could not have sex with Abraham's wife Sarah, just as Isaac Sarah's son would not have sex with his fathers concubines later after his mothers death. Jacobs first born son from Leah, Reuben, ended up losing his firstborn inheritance for uncovering his fathers wife's nakedness with Bilhuh, Rachel's servant woman in Gen 35:22. Though she is called a concubine in this verse, Rachel gave her to Jacob as a surrogate to have children by when Rachel was barren and the two free women as well as the two concubines are all considered Jacobs wives. Today many are divorced or widowed and remarry. The new spouse has to have her or his own place in this law and is given it here in verse 8.
And then there is the fact that when Noah woke up, he knew what his younger son had done to him because he could feel in in his body. A lot could be said about this, because in the occult the act of sodomy produces demons in the recipient. The demon is one of rage and this unclean spirit producing ritual would have been going on before the flood which would have led to the flood. Think of end-time prophesies that warn us what our time is like in the days of Noah and like in the days of Lot. Also the doctrine of Balaam. There must have been some issue with this in the past though we dont know for sure, but Noah knew who to blame and that in itself is interesting and cursed his grandchild, Canaan as a punishment to Ham.
Also interesting is that Ham is also the grandfather of Nimrod who was the most evil and powerful ruler after the flood, so much so, that God had to intervene with what Nimrod was doing by separating all the people into different nations with different languages. Nimrod is the father of all false religions, especially the mystery religions which still use sodomy of young children to lock them into false beliefs via demon possession.
@@maineiax
Very interesting in what you wrote. I did study the verses and text further, and have to agree it dealt only with Noah being violated. Canaan was alive before this happened since Noah specifically mentions the child by name. And indeed what Ham did is an occult ritual.
I’d like to encourage you to possibly do some study videos, if you feel led by the Lord to do so. You have a great wealth of information and understanding that can be beneficial to others.
Yes, Ham was apparently involved in the occult prior to the flood, which opened the door for these practices to begin again after the flood through his linage. And, Nimrod was also a type of the Antichrist, so indeed he was very vile.
Again, thank you for taking the time to share this information. It was very informative. Take care!
@@BlueberryGirl723 I know what I know because I am a survivor of SRA through groups my grandparents were involved with when I was a child. I started recalling events of it much later in my life and am still in a healing season so I personally wont be doing any videos. However, there is someone who helped me tremendously delivering me from the effects these rituals had on me, freeing me from a spiritual prison that I had unknowingly been trapped in most of my life. Its hard to know what will post here but I will try. Look up Marion Knox from Oregon. He was called to have a deliverance ministry and understands the effects these rituals have on people much more so than I do. His contact is in his interviews.
Comparing Scripture with Scripture & Letting Scripture interpret Scripture.
The Second Interpretation makes quite lot of sense, I shall use this indeed so.
I used to believe the same thing until I researched Bible versions. The modern Bible versions are copyrighted. This means with each new edition, the owner has to change the Word of God per the copyright laws of men. The King James 1611 Bible wording is not copyrighted which means with each new edition the words of God have to stay the same and have since 1611. If charts, dictionaries or study notes are added, those could be copyrighted but the words have to stay the same, being preserved since the Protestant Reformation. Because of copyright laws, modern Bible versions can be full of inconsistencies and even contradictions. Read Lev 18 in the King James and it clearly says that Ham had unlawful sex with Noah, not his mother. It clearly defines what seeing the nakedness of different individuals are unlike the version read from in this video which like many other modern versions tries to hide unlawful sex between men.
@@maineiax that’s the second interpretation I have heard from another source. I believe an Dispensationalist Individual spoke of but as usual they will Defend The KJV till Death. But He came to that conclusion that Ham “R word” his Father in his Drunken Stupor/sleep.
Thus The Curse was constructed.
For The Only Way to Justify this Extreme Curse is something Equal in Value must have had to Happen.
An Equal Action cause An Equal Reaction.
@@abrahamissac5938 Its not that I am a King James only kind of individual. I actually perter the Geneva 1560 but mine weighs about 20 lbs and puts my legs to sleep after a while. What I prefer is the truth and so because there are so many different Bible versions, I did many months of researching them and those who put them in the world. This started with the Protestant Reformation because that is where the truth was first revealed to Western civilization which had been controlled by Rome for about 1300 years. Because Rome lost a lot of power during that event, they started an anti reformation counterattack to stop it and to hide the truths that were revealed there.
The reformers had sent letters to all Christian communities in the known world requesting their Bible manuscripts and received back over 1500 copies which when studied where all found to be very similar. This means the WORD had been preserved outside of Romes influence for over 1300 years and these documents were the Masoretic Hebrew OT and the Textus Receptus Greek NT. This is what Rome has wanted to hide and so they hired the society of Jesus, the Jesuits to fix it. The Jesuits infiltrated all the schools and seminaries pretending to be protestants and that is why we have hundreds of denominations now. They also entered governments and changed laws, creating the copyright laws so that they could change the modern bibles back to what Rome wants the world to believe.
I read only bible versions that cannot be copyrighted like those translated during the Protestant Reformation because that is where Gods preserved Word is. That said, it is possible for individuals to be saved by a corrupt Bible, but they wont get any meat there and they wont see how our adversary the devil works to tempt us and mislead us. Because of this, there are many who think they are Christians but they are not.
@@maineiaxwhich verse in Lev 18 do you mean?
@@CamillaJohnston Lev 18:7 The nakedness of thy father, or the nakedness of thy mother, shalt thou not uncover: she is thy mother; thou shalt not uncover her nakedness.
Lev 18:8 The nakedness of thy father's wife shalt thou not uncover: it is thy father's nakedness.
Notice three different people one can have unlawful sex with:
Nakedness of father is sex with father
Nakedness of mother is sex with mother
Nakedness of fathers wife is considered your fathers nakedness because this wife is not your mother. Ones mother is not considered your fathers nakedness because of the close relation.
Jacobs son Reuben slept with his step mother and that was seeing his fathers nakedness.
The Bible version being cited in this video words Lev 18 differently to make your mother the nakedness of your father without differentiating from if he has other wives.
This was a crazy revelation here. Thank you so much for your education Sam. 🙏
I used to believe the same thing until I researched Bible versions. The modern Bible versions are copyrighted. This means with each new edition, the owner has to change the Word of God per the copyright laws of men. The King James 1611 Bible wording is not copyrighted which means with each new edition the words of God have to stay the same and have since 1611. If charts, dictionaries or study notes are added, those could be copyrighted but the words have to stay the same, being preserved since the Protestant Reformation. Because of copyright laws, modern Bible versions can be full of inconsistencies and even contradictions. Read Lev 18 in the King James and it clearly says that Ham had unlawful sex with Noah, not his mother. It clearly defines what seeing the nakedness of different individuals are unlike the version read from in this video which like many other modern versions tries to hide unlawful sex between men.
@@maineiax Thanks for your input. Though I know that Sam champions the King James Version as well, so he's coming from the same place.
@@aarongibson8179 There was a time when I believed Ham slept with his mother too but it was because I heard it from a trusted preacher and I was kinda lazy about reading the Bible.
Ever wonder what the mystery of iniquity is?
It has to do with satanic rituals that are used to create mind controlled slaves. Its a ritual performed on young children and involves what Ham did to Noah and what Ham did to Nimrod and what Nimrod did that caused God to come down and separate the people into different nations and different languages or nothing would stop them from what they imagined to do.
People who are anally targeted receive demons from those who penetrated them. People who have demons are people who are mentally incapacitated who believe they are born gay or born trans or born something other than what they really are. They are people who fear, people easily manipulated and controlled by handlers or anyone they consider in authority.
The end times will be like in the days of Noah and like in the days of Lot.
Always learn something from you, Sam. God bless.
Awesome Bible Study!!
That is the best explaination I've heard of this! Thank you; I alwayas wondered what that meant.
This was amazing 👏 🤩
I used to believe the same thing until I researched Bible versions. The modern Bible versions are copyrighted. This means with each new edition, the owner has to change the Word of God per the copyright laws of men. The King James 1611 Bible wording is not copyrighted which means with each new edition the words of God have to stay the same and have since 1611. If charts, dictionaries or study notes are added, those could be copyrighted but the words have to stay the same, being preserved since the Protestant Reformation. Because of copyright laws, modern Bible versions can be full of inconsistencies and even contradictions. Read Lev 18 in the King James and it clearly says that Ham had unlawful sex with Noah, not his mother. It clearly defines what seeing the nakedness of different individuals are unlike the version read from in this video which like many other modern versions tries to hide unlawful sex between men.
Woah man..that's awsome explanation. Thank you Sam.
This has just blown my mind. Thank you for this.
Thanks Sam for your clarification.
I am currently reading the Bible and find it very difficult in most areas to grasp.
I’ve started with the Old Testament and am now reading Numbers.
I enjoy you videos, thank you very much for posting them.
OT is hard to get through. If it's your first go read the new testament and then try to find Jesus in the old testament.
It’s worth reading through. Ask God to teach you first. God will speak to your heart as you read. You can use teachings from Calvary Chapel church websites or to help understand . A good one is Skip Heitzig or Joe Focht. That’s to help with understanding.
@@EranRicos Ask God? Read God's word in the New Testament and learn to know his Spirit.
Everything is about and points too JESUS (and HIS cross and resurrection). EVERYTHING. Jesus promised to send you the SPIRIT of TRUTH and no man will have to teach you anythin, the word because you will have the SPIRIT of TRUTH, the HOLY SPIRIT in you which JESUS will send to you if you ask. Jesus is the word of GOD, all of it, not just the new testiment. It is the WORD of GOD that saves you, The man JESUS. Jesus said that HIS WORDS are SPIRIT and TRUTH. That is all we need. Stay away from teaching seminars and stuff like that. Just make everything about reading your bible and walking in it. If you dont understand something it is because GOD hasn't revealed it to you yet. The harder you work on searching for HIM and handing every part of youself over to HIS SON, the more the LORD will reveal to you. Edit: LOVE you brother.
@@Mark777h you don’t need to ask for it. Just hear his gentle words, his eternal peace throughout Jesus especially because He is His Son.
Good teaching! Great stuff!
I used to believe the same thing until I researched Bible versions. The modern Bible versions are copyrighted. This means with each new edition, the owner has to change the Word of God per the copyright laws of men. The King James 1611 Bible wording is not copyrighted which means with each new edition the words of God have to stay the same and have since 1611. If charts, dictionaries or study notes are added, those could be copyrighted but the words have to stay the same, being preserved since the Protestant Reformation. Because of copyright laws, modern Bible versions can be full of inconsistencies and even contradictions. Read Lev 18 in the King James and it clearly says that Ham had unlawful sex with Noah, not his mother. It clearly defines what seeing the nakedness of different individuals are unlike the version read from in this video which like many other modern versions tries to hide unlawful sex between men.
@maineiax interesting! May I follow up after I dig into this a little? Thank you!
@@danielramsey197 Absolutely! I pray the Holy Spirit gives you discernment to weed through all the deceptions and now AI.
That's the first time that's ever made sense to me. Ty 😊👍
I thought I would check this out and see if you would document what I already knew. And you did. Great job.
This teaching was a blessing.
I used to believe the same thing until I researched Bible versions. The modern Bible versions are copyrighted. This means with each new edition, the owner has to change the Word of God per the copyright laws of men. The King James 1611 Bible wording is not copyrighted which means with each new edition the words of God have to stay the same and have since 1611. If charts, dictionaries or study notes are added, those could be copyrighted but the words have to stay the same, being preserved since the Protestant Reformation. Because of copyright laws, modern Bible versions can be full of inconsistencies and even contradictions. Read Lev 18 in the King James and it clearly says that Ham had unlawful sex with Noah, not his mother. It clearly defines what seeing the nakedness of different individuals are unlike the version read from in this video which like many other modern versions tries to hide unlawful sex between men.
@@maineiax _"The modern Bible versions are copyrighted. This means with each new edition, the owner has to change the Word of God":_ simply ridiculous. You seem to have no idea of what translation is about.
@@ThefrenchFranz I misquoted. I went back to my sources as it has been a while. The manuscripts the newer modern bibles are translated from are not the same as those found and translated in the Protestant Reformation and used to make the king James and the other older Bible versions from that time. Look at the history of the Alexandrian text. YT wont let me post links. Its New Age, creating a universal religion based on uniting all beliefs regardless of truth under one roof. They want the person into Buddhism to think that Jesus is the same god as Buddha when that is not true. The copyright part is men or organizations claiming ownership and deciding what get printed so that they can profit not only from all sales, but from people who may want to quote from them, a copyright fee. These versions are promoted in the pulpits and seminaries so that the truth is watered down and the paster can serve up a happy meal to fill the pew with tithers.
Probably the easiet way to see is to compare every verse because you will find many of them missing. Some remove the virgin birth. They make Joseph the father of Jesus instead of God. They remove many miracles. They separate the Name Jesus Christ into just Jesus or just Christ, for and give titles belonging to Jesus, to Satan. They separate Satan from Lucifer when they are the same being. Lucifer is deception through the appearance of good and Satan is the dragon come to kill and destroy. They remove information about certain lifestyle choices God calls abominations and the list goes on. Even here I tried to show how one Bible says Ham had sex with his mother when the Reformation Era Bible version are clear that Ham had sex with Noah. That might not seem much worse but its one of many clues to figure out End-time prophesies and understanding how the adversary deceives us. I have left plenty of information here for those who want it, but now I am done.
Thank God, someone else saw this. It is true. The Lord has revealed it to me years ago.🙌🏾
Ephesians 4:13-14 NLT)
This will continue until we all come to such unity in our faith and knowledge of God's Son that we will be mature in the Lord, measuring up to the full and complete standard of Christ.
It's a false teaching.
@@4custaywithme Amen
FINALLY, an explanation of this passage! Thank you.
This is, with no doubt, the BEST EXPLANATION ever made about that passage.
well that makes a whole lot more sense.
Thank you for the revelation..
To uncover nakedness is to expose the person's faults and sois.
Interesting theory
❤ people should read this and study the bible, not interpret what it might say. Nothing saysthe mother was involved. Canaan was always a place.
Powerful BRO well done man didn't know this
Wow, what a revelation.🙏
Awesome!
WOW this is incredible!!
Good teaching, HalaluYaH!
The beginning of sin, the mystery of iniquity began in Eden, Genesis 4:8-15-24.
Man didn't directly commit sin, but was led by a third party- the devil in the serpent, and was made to sin against God. In God's right, He killed a third party propitiation for their sins- the sinless Lamb. Thus God, to be Righteous and Just, must be the One to provide Himself a sacrificial Lamb, to atone for the sins which the third party- Adam, had committed, to be able to Righteously judge the other third party, the devil, satan, the dragon, to finally get punished. But there has to be opportunity on both sides to prove that God is Righteous and Just in His judgment, by giving man 1000 years to prove he can eventually hold his own and not succumb to peer or outside pressure, in order to be worthy of being redeemed, ransomed, regenerated, restored and reconciled, back to God- through Jesus Christ.
2 Corinthians 5.
Then, man- Cain deliberately killed his brother, Abel, but this sin couldn't readily be judged simply because there was no preceding law about being one's brother's keeper that was to have been broken. (Thus, the whole system was destroyed by the flood, and the laws started with that Genesis 9:5-6, until finally judged and finished on the cross John 19:30)
And in verse 15, a precedent was laid down for the time it would take to judge sin, 70x7 or 490 years.
That generation was wiped out by the flood, but the precept remained: sin shall be avenged seventy and seven fold. (Matthew 18:21-23).
This was the standard by which Israel also judged, as they also had to spend 70 sabbath years ( or 70x7= 490 years), in exile, outside of the promised land.
When it was the 69th week year Daniel prayed to God, and fasted to remind Him of the imminent due date of the return of God's people to their promised land; but the sin of the Amorite was not yet full, Genesis 15:16, also, Israel was still in rebellion towards God, and the land cannot sustain rebellion- it was Holy!
So, the Messiah had to come and make a way for grace and justification, and righteousness of God to be imputed, so Israel can get back their monarchy, through the house of David, and back to the kingdom of God, by grace through faith in Christ Jesus, as the Son of God, and the Son of man -the promised Son of David, the king of Israel to order His Kingdom Isaiah 9:6; who would ascend His throne as God had promised him. Romans 1:3; Acts 2:30, and come to bring them back to God, Jeremiah 16:16a; Luke 19:10; Matthew 10:5. Instead, they rejected and killed Him.
Thus, from then onwards, the way to God was opened to whosoever would come to Him by grace through the shedding of His blood, by grace through faith in His sacrificial death, burial and resurrection.
They were given the adoption of sons and daughters into the kingdom, which hitherto, they were not permitted Ephesians 2:13; John 1:11-14, becoming heirs and joint heirs of God and the Abrahamic covenanted promises an blessing (Genesis 25:6- the representatives of his other children by Hagar and Keturah, the Kings of the East, could now access and partake of the blessing, and they showed their allegiance and faith, by worshipping Jesus Christ, as a Child!)
Jesus Christ gave His life for all who would simply believe in Him as Lord and Savior, in order to keep them from the wrath of God that will be unleashed upon the Amorite, until the end. Isaiah 63:18; Daniel 8:13; Zechariah 12:3; Luke 21:24; Revelation 11:2.
And eventually, they will be rescued at the second coming of Christ Luke 21:13; Zechariah 14.
He finished the work of salvation of the soul of man John 19:30 and this continues the "acceptable year of the Lord" which began as He took the sealed book of Daniel, 12:4, from God, as the Lamb of God, who alone is Worthy, and opened the seals Revelation 5, and fulfilled the first of the three part of Isaiah 61:2, in Luke 4:16-21, and He SHUT it again. This will run through this dispensation of preaching of the gospel of grace, (which ended the preaching of the gospel of the kingdom, which ended with the stoning of Stephen) by faith in the sacrificial death, burial and resurrection of Jesus Christ, and He will return to gather His saints from the world, 1 Thessalonians 4:13-18; 1 Corinthians 15; and present them faultless before the presence of God the Father, with exceeding joy, Jude 24; with victory over sin, devil, death, hell and eternal damnation in the lake of fire and brimstone Isaiah 66:24.
The second dispensation is nearly upon us, at this time Isaiah 63:4, which will usher in the tribulation period when the 70th and last year will be ushered in to finish all transgressions! Daniel 9:24.
( As the Messiah has become the sacrifice for sin, and was dead, buried and rose again from the dead! His shed blood sprinkled on the heavenly mercy seat for propitiation for sins for all who would go to God by and through Him, simply by faith! Ephesians 2:8).
Then, the Lord will return the second time, complete with His body, as a new Creature resting upon the Mount of Olives Zechariah 14, to make a way of escape for the remnants of Israel Matthew 24:31.
Then the battle of armageddon will ensue, and it will end up in total obliteration of this earth. Isaiah 24; Joel chapters 2 and 3, Jeremiah chapters 1-11...; 1 Peter 3 etc.
This is the fullness and end, and judgment of the sin of the Amorite! Matthew 18:21-22; Psalm 75:8; 73:3-17.
Then the new heaven and earth will be created after the conclusion of the millennium- to mark the expiration date of sin and death, like it was back in Eden. Now man will live out the 1000 year curse of death Isaiah 65, (Genesis 5).
Then history will repeat itself when everything reaches full circle- the serpent will be released once again, Revelation 20:1-6, to tempt man as he did with Adam and Eve, those who follow him will get totally judged and cast into the lake of fire and brimstone, together with hell, death, the antichrist, false prophets and all whose portion is with them Isaiah 66:24. Revelation chapters 19-22.
God has perfected the end from the beginning. But as it is written-"My people are destroyed for lack of Knowledge " Hosea 4:6, so, "With all thine getting, get understanding " Proverbs 4:7; Luke 24:45. Be filled with and led by the Holy Spirit, and abide in the fold, John 10, until He returns as promised, to take up His purchased possession! John 14:26; Ephesians chapters 1-2!
Then He will set up His kingdom! Isaiah 9:6!
Be encouraged!
yep in covering Adam and Eve, God Himself killed an animal and blood was spilled... using the fur/skin of an animal to cover them...
Nice post. One comment though, In Rev 13, the two beasts, one comes from the sea and the second, antichrist comes from the Earth. I believe the first is the false prophet and is part of the Beast kingdom ,Rome somehow and that both are resurrected beings from hell brought back with their new immortal bodies, because they comes from the sea and the Earth, Antichrist cannot be killed by man because it is in its resurrected body.
This theory is based on how we all have to die physically once, then are resurrected to either eternal life or eternal damnation in new immortal bodies.
Then when Jesus Christ returns, these two beings are immediately sent to the Lake of fire before the Millennial rest in Rev 19:20. Because the final judgement at the end of time is for the resurrected dead in Christ, these two men, the false prophet and Antichrist have to both be resurrected so that they go into the Lake in their resurrected immortal bodies.
Along the same theory, that all die physically once, the two witnesses could be Enoch (seventh from Adam) and Elijah because these two never officially died in the flesh. They both are killed by Antichrist, their bodies left in the streets for 3 days and then they are brought back to life and taken up to heaven in front of many witnesses. Clues to this is they have the power to rain fire down from heaven and are called the two olive trees which easily point to Elijah. Zech 4:11-14, Rev 11: 3-7 where we also see that the beast (antichrist) who kills them had come from the bottomless pit--as a resurrected being now in his immortal body. So this antichrist person is one from the past, most likely someone who was the most evil on Earth who caused the most confusion, and led more people away from God and truth than any other man, ever. That would have to be Nimrod. Who the false prophet is, Im not sure yet...maybe Judas Iscariot because he gave up Jesus for money to the High Priest who was under Roman authority, claiming their king was Caesar.
Very good. However, it was 70 years of exile in Babylon and not 490 years. Cheers
@@robertcain3426
70×7=490. 70 sabbath years.
@@robertcain3426 I think the sentence structure is a bit off, the 490 years is how long Judah went without keeping the land Sabbaths and so Gods judgment was to put them in captivity for all the land Sabbath years they ignored which was Gods way of resting the land from them. A land Sabbath was supposed to be every 7th year so 70 missed land sabbaths would cover a 490 year span. But you are correct, they were only in captivity in Babylon for 70 years.
This is really interesting. I have been a Christian for 40 years and never heard this explanation. It makes sense and explains why Noah cursed his grandson. I always thought that Ham had raped his father while Noah was in a drunken sleep.
Still a valid question.
Maybe his mother didn't consent.
Above COMMENT we have 66yrs now we have 40yrs Amazing no wonder david said this in Psalms 37:25-26 (KJV)
I have been young, and now am old; Yet have I not seen the righteous forsaken, nor his seed begging bread. He is ever merciful, and lendeth; And his seed is blessed.
@greensorrel6860 good point
Me too. I thought Ham was a homosexual.
I am impressed...wow! So beautiful! Thank you ,Sir !
I used to believe the same thing until I researched Bible versions. The modern Bible versions are copyrighted. This means with each new edition, the owner has to change the Word of God per the copyright laws of men. The King James 1611 Bible wording is not copyrighted which means with each new edition the words of God have to stay the same and have since 1611. If charts, dictionaries or study notes are added, those could be copyrighted but the words have to stay the same, being preserved since the Protestant Reformation. Because of copyright laws, modern Bible versions can be full of inconsistencies and even contradictions. Read Lev 18 in the King James and it clearly says that Ham had unlawful sex with Noah, not his mother. It clearly defines what seeing the nakedness of different individuals are unlike the version read from in this video which like many other modern versions tries to hide unlawful sex between men.
great insights into God's word, thanks for sharing 🙏
Yes, after I read Leviticus it explained this strange bible passage. It was several years of being perplexed until I hunkered down and ploughed through the Pentateuch. I’m so surprised how many want to stay with your first explanation. It is safe but in light of what Leviticus clearly says to me is not being genuine. The issue of incest is through the bible, the necessity of it in the beginning , and also Lots daughters when they felt they needed to conceive a child to continue the race as they experienced a major disaster they thought all dead but them. I also was wondering if this is not a broader attempt at usurpation of Noah’s authority by Ham, taking his mother and humiliating Noah , bringing this power play to the attention of his brothers as a sense of I’m assuming leadership, and his brothers deny him and support Noah?
Since Sam explained it that way, I can definitely see it exactly as you've questioned in the end.
I think it's both. Or could be r@pe
😲Oh my Lord... Could this really be?!?! That’s disgusting🤮. Thanks Sam Shamoun for sharing this revelation that you have gotten. Need to slowly take this revelation in and allow the Holy Spirit to help me assimilate this. God Bless👍👍👍
The Ammonites and Moabites were born due to incestous relations between Lotus and and his daughters.
Ya it that vile. Ham is the 1st human mother fer.
This is more well known in Jewish teaching.
The reason ham did such a thing was to usurp his father's leadership role.
The Bible is amazing I have learned so much from asking GOD to help me understand and Sam is such a wealth of knowledge.
The best explanation ive heard
Thank you for sharing.
That's the first time I've heard the incest explanation
And heard many different explanations over the years
I used to be confused about this too, then I started researching the different Bible versions and where they come from and found something really interesting about copyright laws.
The modern Bible versions are copyrighted. This means with each new edition, the owner has to change the Word of God per the copyright laws of men. The King James 1611 Bible wording is not copyrighted which means with each new edition the words of God have to stay the same and have since 1611. If charts, dictionaries or study notes are added, those could be copyrighted but the words have to stay the same, being preserved since the Protestant Reformation. Because of copyright laws, modern Bible versions can be full of inconsistencies and even contradictions. Read Lev 18 in the King James and it clearly says that Ham had unlawful sex with Noah, not his mother. It clearly defines what seeing the nakedness of different individuals are unlike the version read from in this video which like many other modern versions tries to hide unlawful sex between men.
@@maineiax yeah I read that too
Sadly even the King James has bad translations from the texus receptus...
We also have to remember that it's a spiritual book full of allegory and numerology
It only makes sense when all is applied
@@richardlilley6274 The Textus Receptus is the preserved Word. In the 15th century, the Reformers sent letters to all the known Christian communities outside of the Western Roman Empire. They received back over 1500 copies which when studied, were found to be mostly the same. This is the Textus Receptus.
The modern versions come from the Alexandrian manuscript commissioned by Emperor Constantine in 325. He outlawed and ordered to be destroyed all other copies specifically if they were written by one of the witnesses of Jesus Christ of Nazareth. Romes copy was to unite all religions together by making them believe all gods were the same.
Add in copyright laws and any Bible copyrighted legally has to be changed with each new publication. The NIV removed 65000 words its first edition, then later because it had changed so much, they ended up rewriting the manuscript it was translated from to match their latest edition. Necromancers Westcott and Hort, are responsible for promoting these modern versions are easier to read but they actually teach a different Jesus.
Westcott and Hort created a new Greek language for their deception.
I read the KJV because it cannot be copyrighted which means it reads the same words for over 400 years.
I praise the Father that his judgment starts at the pulpit...
So why did Shem and Japheth walk backwards with the garment to cover their father's nakedness?
That is a literal account. Why should the first be figurative and the seconf literal?
Explain.
If the incest account is true, then it is possible that when Ham told his brothers about his father’s nakedness, he was actually inviting them to partake after him but they refused. So their walking backwards and not seeing could just be symbolic of not committing the same sin. It could also be symbolic of them having their own children and continuing Noah’s line but again all speculation I guess.
Their naked mother is why
@@brianevans6617
You may be right, although that is not explicitly in the text but it doen't explain why Ham's behaviour is to be taken figuratively but in the same account his brother's behaviour is to be taken literally?
@@Must_not_say_that I personally don't see an issue with using both a figurative phrase and a literal phrase in the same descriptive paragraph, or even in the same sentence. We do it all the time in English. For example, if a priest or pastor has been caught in a p3doph!le sex scandal at his church, some would say that he is a "wolf in sheep's clothing" and "of the devil" (figurative) and he should be removed immediately from his position of leadership at the church (literal).
@@sahararayne96 Then you miss the point of inconsistency that allows anything to be read into the text that is not the meaning of the text.
Your examples do not demonstrate a conflicting figurative and literal interpretation but merely the use of descrkiptive language.
The point is that if the part about Ham is figurative, what is the figurative meaning of the two brothers walking physically backward to cover their father since it directly relates to the supposed figurative meaning concerning Ham? If you can explain that please.
Otherwise it is dubious.
There wouod be no need for the physical action of the btrothers to be told us if the part about Ham is figurative as claimed. What then is the purpose of the part about the two brothers?
To add one more reference that reinforces this reading about Ham's sin: Genesis 2:24 "That is why a man leaves his father and mother and is united to his wife, and they become one flesh."
Husband and wife are as one, so by committing incest with one parent it is as if Ham had committed it with both.
Thank you for confirming for me!!!
I used the same expression... how beautiful the Bible is. I love you both brothers.
Naama died before the flood after the birth of their three sons. Noah remarried to another Naama from the line of Cain. Ham had consensual relations with her. This is how the Nephilim bloodline was allowed to continue after the flood but to lesser potency and numbers
Friend, whatever Bible version you are reading from, its not the Christian one. Look to the older Bible versions like the King James or Geneva 1560. Stay away from books not considered canonical or at least put Scripture first rather than what sounds good to you. Nephelim means giant, not some alien from outer space like the New Age movement led by satan wants people to believe. In the KJV it says to see your fathers nakedness can mean two things, Its either his wife that is not your mother or its your father. Nowhere in Scripture does it say who Noahs wife is or that he had more than one wife so the wife of Noah is Hams mother which means Ham did not have sex with his mother. Ham had sex with Noah which is why Noah KNEW just like anyone else would know if they had been anally invaded upon waking up from too much drinking the night before. My God is not the Author of confusion, but Satan is.
@@maineiax why not go all the way and study the Tanach in Hebrew along with other ancient Jewish scriptures. King James Version!? What a laugh
@@barryvallen1072 If you do not believe the God who Created everything is capable of preserving His Divine Word in every language spoken, then your god is not my God.
If you prefer to believe Jesuit lies about the King James, then read the Geneva 1560. It was the Bible that led the Pilgrims to the American shores 400 years ago. and Middle English is not so different that modern.
@@maineiax illogical argument. Too many discrepancies in the Christian scriptures. Read the Masoretic in Hebrew or the New Jerusalem bible in English. The Jews have preserved the integrity of Tanach not a bunch of masons under king james
@@barryvallen1072 The discrepancies are in the modern versions, not the versions that came from the Protestant Reformation. The jews control the secret societies through the Jesuits and other positions of authority. As far as their teachings in the Talmud, that is from Babylon and is subject to change due to the traditions of their elders. Scripture teaches that the Jews will be sent strong delusion until the fullness of the gentiles is complete. Im not here to argue, you have free will to believe whatever you want, but if you are looking for what you want to believe rather than what is true, you wont find peace in your life.
Thank you it makes sense now
Awesome revelation. Thanks for sharing.
I used to believe the same thing until I researched Bible versions. The modern Bible versions are copyrighted. This means with each new edition, the owner has to change the Word of God per the copyright laws of men. The King James 1611 Bible wording is not copyrighted which means with each new edition the words of God have to stay the same and have since 1611. If charts, dictionaries or study notes are added, those could be copyrighted but the words have to stay the same, being preserved since the Protestant Reformation. Because of copyright laws, modern Bible versions can be full of inconsistencies and even contradictions. Read Lev 18 in the King James and it clearly says that Ham had unlawful sex with Noah, not his mother. It clearly defines what seeing the nakedness of different individuals are unlike the version read from in this video which like many other modern versions tries to hide unlawful sex between men.
@@maineiax there's no mention of Ham in the entire book of Leviticus
@@markwaki3950 I believe you are confusing me with someone else, friend. I never said Ham was in the book of Leviticus. I quoted the sex laws in Leviticus 18 to fix the error being taught in this video. The sex laws as written in the only Bible versions with the full truth make it clear that Ham sod 0 mized Noah.
This will blow you away. Timestamps:
0:00 Sam reads the passage (Genesis 9)
1:37 The first way to interpret the text: Ham mocked his father, but this doesn’t make sense in light of the curse of Canaan
2:45 Start of the second interpretation: What does uncover the nakedness of your father” mean? [This will blow you away]
7:07 Then why curse Canaan, and not Ham?
10:03 Was this fair to Canaan?
The Canaanites NOW have a way out of that curse, Jesus spoke Matthew 12:31-32, NOW it is the blasphemy against the Holy Ghost. Everyone who tells anyone that gets to close to them that God approves of them when he doesn't, they blaspheme the name of the lord.
Very good, I never fully understood this and though maybe it was homosexual. thanks.
I thought he saw erect and made fun of him.
The idiot confessed to his brothers of bumping his own mother for goodness sake.
For Juan Serrano at the end of the video.
"How was that fair to Canaan?"
It's not.
Its not fair that the sinful consequences of a father affect the child but that's how it works.
Dad did wrong, how is it fair the kid doesn't get to see his dad cause of incarceration?
Its not.
But it is what it is.
Make sure you don't sin as best you can and with the intent to not create a transgression that will overlap to your Own child.
Cause it won't be fair to them.
There is NO WAY Ham did anything perverse with his mother or father. Ham would have been put to death! Canaan's curse was prophetic, since he left his allotted land and took part of Shem's inheritance. Not only that, Canaan would mix with the Nephilim. You are WAY OFF on this and espousing an occult lie. Back in those days children could be stoned to death for being unruly (Deut 21). Not only that, when Lot had an incestous relationship with his daughters, it was in plain language.
The God Culture provides a much better teaching on this event.
Not only the incest but there is one more sin "Rape". I believe after hearing him I could totally tell Ham forced in to his mom's nakedness.
Simple and understandable language yet deeper than Mariana Trench - The Holy Bible ❤!
I used to believe the same thing until I researched Bible versions. The modern Bible versions are copyrighted. This means with each new edition, the owner has to change the Word of God per the copyright laws of men. The King James 1611 Bible wording is not copyrighted which means with each new edition the words of God have to stay the same and have since 1611. If charts, dictionaries or study notes are added, those could be copyrighted but the words have to stay the same, being preserved since the Protestant Reformation. Because of copyright laws, modern Bible versions can be full of inconsistencies and even contradictions. Read Lev 18 in the King James and it clearly says that Ham had unlawful sex with Noah, not his mother. It clearly defines what seeing the nakedness of different individuals are unlike the version read from in this video which like many other modern versions tries to hide unlawful sex between men.
God truly is merciful and good.😊
Our Most High God is the perfect communicator. He saw it all before it occurred and placed everything so well. You're amazing Go LORD
There is a non-canonical text called The Book of Lamech of Cain. It takes place before the Flood, and is currently in a private collection, but a translation of it is available on Amazon. Anyway, I've often thought about this subject, and what's interesting about the Lamech literature, is that there is a section in it which claims that Naamah; wofe of Noah was a daughter of Lamech of the tribe of Cain, and she slept around with Nephilim men in her youth as a prostitute. Supposedly, she married Noah many years later and her father told her not to tell him about the exploits of her youth. I personally I agree with the interpretation that Caanan is the product of Ham/Chronos/Utu and Naamah/Gaia. In the Greek mythology, it's interesting that Ham/Chronos castrates Noah/Uranus/Deucalion/Erishguranna/Atram-Hasis/Utnapishtim/Manu/Tezpi, etc. In that context, he castrated his father to usurp his authority as king of Ararat/Aratta/Urartu. The "gods"or the rulers of the bloodline of Noah, later become ruled by Japheth/Jupiter/Zeus/Jove/Pra-Japati etc., and others are deified by their descendants as well. The Sumerian literature indicates that Noah was the priest-king, like his forefathers, and ruled a city by the Euphrates called Shruppak before the Flood. This partially explains how he would have the means to build the ark. Ham seems to have left Aratta to try to re-establish that Kingdom in Shinar/Sumer. His sons became kings ad deifiedhim as Utu/Chronos. In the context of the interpretation of Genesis, we would assume that Naamah was drunk with Noah, they had sex in their tent, and perhaps both fell asleep, and then Ham the usurper, either raped his mother, or convinced her to voluntarily sleep with him because she was very drunk. However, given the description of her youth in the book about the life of her father; Lamech of Cain, it may not have been rape. Drunkenness might have played a big role, but she could have essentially been reverting to her pre-marital nature. People often asked how the Nephilim/Rephaim returned after the flood also, and multiple theories and explanations for that. Personally, I believe children were produced during pagan sexual rituals, and the hosts were possessed by Nephilim spirits, and concieved children who's dna was altered and created a new race of post-flood Rephaim. As crazy that may sound, many theologians do not like the idea of a second Nephilim incursion for which there is little evidence, and they also don't like the idea that wives of pure spiritual and genetic background for Noah's sons. Later in the Greek and Norse mythology we see this relationship between the gods and the Titans or the Aesir and the Vanir. Interestingly, Jotun is mentioned in non-canonical Book of Og also, as one of the giant clan leaders summoned to battle against Moses. This tells us that Norse mythology refers to a time around 4,000 years ago in Scythia/Thrace ad the near East. It is not made clear in any text if the Rephaim came from one particular sons bloodline, but personally I believe they came from the line of Ham.
I bet you're used to being ignored, like me. I've thought all of this for a while. I haven't gotten into all the pagan stories as you have. I read the book of Lamech, found it on the Internet. I believe also, Naamah was either the wife of Noah, or the wife of Ham, and that Ham did have an incestuous act with Noah's wife. However, I've had a hard time sorting it all out because, firstly, I believe in the same respect of Eve and the serpent, and through the lineage of Cain, you come to the sons of the wives of Lamech. In which if you define the names of the sons in order, adding the daughter last; it reads, Flow, Flow, offspring of Cain, Naamah. So, the lineage was carried through the flood, and there was actually never a second influx, just one. You can also see that though, Canaan was cursed, the curse was lifted after the marriage to Esau, changing it to breaking the yoke, when he has dominion in Gen 27. They came under servitude in Jos 9 and later gained dominion in 2 ki 17:24 after the dispersion. It's written lightly although out the scriptures and blatant in Zech 14:21. That's why CHRIST did not argue with their lineage claim in John 8.
I think that the other unstated version is correct; the other version is that Noah did not curse Ham
because God had blessed Noah and his sons (including Ham) when they had exited the ark, and
so Noah didn't want to curse one whom God had blessed ....... so he cursed his son instead.
KJV, book of Genesis, chapter 9, verse 1 (written by the prophet and leader Moses):
*"And God blessed Noah and his sons,* and said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth."
they did multiply (Blessing) and have left some mark in the archeological record... and have the land called Canaan after Canaan himself.. but when they continued in sin.. God gave some time for them to repent but the cities of Canaan continued in sin, so they were judged.
Good point on not cursing Ham or condemning him to a death he deserved. Im glad your reading the KJB because it reads a bit different in Levitius than the bible version in this video. In the KJV Leviticus 18 defines seeing your fathers nakedness as being one of two possibilities, 1 its your father, or 2 its your fathers wife, a person not your mother. This means Ham did something worse that have unlawful sex with his mother. He anally abused his father, Noah which is why Noah knew what had happened when he woke up. The sins of the father are passed on and so the Canaanites were into all kinds of sex rituals with anything including animals. Nimrod was also the grandson of Ham and look what he did.
@@maineiaxif you go back to look at the phrasing used, "your father's nakedness" is further defined to mean "your mother's nakedness." How do we know that? Because the Bible says "that is." This particular phrase is used as a signal to indicate further explanation or definition for a previous word or phrase
@@dahliaherrod4301 It really depends on the Bible version. The modern Bibles promoted as being easier to understand have added to and taken away from the Word because of copyright laws and because they were created by men who were not even Christian, but instead were spiritualists and necromancers. I can boldly say this after years of searching them out wanting to find the truth and the preserved Word of God. If any of these modern bible versions teach repentance, and some do, one can be saved by them, but they hide the sins that our heavenly Father considers the ultimate abomination and what might be considered the mystery of iniquity when it concerns very young children.
Before I show you why I said what I said, we have to look at what sex laws were allowed at that time because until Moses gave the Law on Mt Sinai, incest was not a problem since after the flood there was only 8 people left and God told them to go forth and replenish the Earth. It would have been unlawful for parents to have sex with their children, but it would be lawful for siblings and first cousins to marry. Abraham married his half sister, Sarah. Mankind's genetics were very pure back then and lifespans still lasted 400-600 years for several generations after the flood.
God created man and woman to be together to procreate and enjoy each others companionship. God did not create men to have sex with men, the way a man would have sex with women, considering that act an abomination. We need this information to understand prophesies and know what time we are in. An end-times prophesy that happens just before Jesus Christ returns is our days will be like in the days of Noah and like in the days of Lot. The days of Noah can be both before and after the flood. The doctrine of Balaam is also part of this mystery. These are a clues to whats going on currently with nations leadership condoning what God calls abominations but they have been watered down or completely removed from some of these modern bible versions.
To understand what it means to uncover someones nakedness, we have to go to the law of Moses in Leviticus 18 where I will post what the KJB says and then we use prayer and the Holy Spirit to meditate on what it says.
Lev 18:7 The nakedness of thy father, or the nakedness of thy mother, shalt thou not uncover: she is thy mother; thou shalt not uncover her nakedness.
Lev 18:8 The nakedness of thy father's wife shalt thou not uncover: it is thy father's nakedness.
When I read that, I look at it as God is talking to me about my family members. My dad had one wife and one marriage.
What I see is the nakedness of my father is separate from the nakedness of my mother because of the word "or" and because in the second half of verse 7 it says my mothers nakedness is her nakedness rather than my fathers nakedness. It says my father has a nakedness and separate from him, my mother also has a nakedness. So if I uncover my mothers nakedness, that means I am having sex with her. If I uncover my fathers nakedness per verse 7, I am having sex with my father.
In verse 8 it says my fathers wife. This woman would be my stepmother because back then a man could have several wives as Jacob did and we need to have a way to label them so my mother is called mother and my step mother is called my fathers wife. . Verse 8 identifies that it is unlawful for me to have sex with a step parent. An example of this is Reuben, firstborn of Jacob and Leah who lost his inheritance because he slept with his stepmother.
Because Noah only had one wife and she was the mother of Ham, it does not say that Ham uncovered his mothers nakedness. It says he uncovered his fathers nakedness.
There was a time when I thought Ham slept with his mother and she got pregnant with Canaan but that was something I heard someone else preach and totally misread verse 7 because I could not comprehend at that time that Ham did something even worse--he anally abused his dad, Noah. Later in the next few chapters we read of Hams grandson, Nimrod. Nimrod was the most evil and powerful ruler ever, so much so, that God came down and knocked over a tower and then scattered all the people into different nations and languages. What Nimrod did was start the mystery religions that all false belief systems today can be traced back to him in Babylon.
@@maineiax
1)The nakedness of thy father, is thy father nakedness.
2)The nakedness of thy mother, is thy mother's nakedness.
3) The nakedness of thy mother, is thy father's nakedness.
4) The nakedness of thy father, is thy mother's nakedness.
By application, any wife of your father is your mother and you're not to see their nakedness.
I believe you were accurate previously on the sinful actions of Ham, while you "may" also be accurate that he did the same thing to both Noah and his wife solely, which it wasn't the first time it happened. Looking at it only in man to man context, disannul's the evil from beginning to end, making it only spiritually.
I always suspected this in these passages concerning Ham, but wasn’t sure how widely interpreted this might be. Thank you 🙏
I do love your channel you are a rare Christian indeed. The spirit has guided you many times.
It sounds good on the surface, but what isn’t addressed is the fact the Genesis 9 account doesn’t mention “uncovering nakedness” like Leviticus does but rather mentions he “saw” Noah’s nakedness. It also mentions that Noah became a farmer and he got drunk and he uncovered himself. That sounds like it’s talking about a specific man and doesn’t make a transition to alluding to his wife.
Moses didn’t write Genesis?
Of course he did, but what I’m saying is that the phrase used in Genesis 9 (seeing nakedness) is not the same as in Leviticus (uncovering nakedness). We don’t have context that indicates “seeing nakedness” is equivalent to “uncovering nakedness.”
I feel the same way. It depends on the Bible version we read from. The modern Bible versions are copyrighted. This means with each new edition, the owner has to change the Word of God per the copyright laws of men. The King James 1611 Bible wording is not copyrighted which means with each new edition the words of God have to stay the same and have since 1611. If charts, dictionaries or study notes are added, those could be copyrighted but the words have to stay the same, being preserved since the Protestant Reformation. Because of copyright laws, modern Bible versions can be full of inconsistencies and even contradictions. Read Lev 18 in the King James and it clearly says that Ham had unlawful sex with Noah, not his mother. It clearly defines what seeing the nakedness of different individuals are unlike the version read from in this video which like many other modern versions tries to hide unlawful sex between men.
@@GAAlbury alright. I think you’re focusing on the word uncover, but the actual phrase in question is nakedness of his father. Nakedness of his father means the nakedness of his mother. So Ham saw his mother naked (with a possible gap by the author, ie he slept with her) and told his two brothers. Then Canaan being the product of the act, being cursed because like father like son. Hope that clears up this interpretation. Not saying it is the right one.
@@ChristOverAllJeremy Thanks for actually engaging with Sam's second explanation.....When Noah says "YOUR brothers" - what do you think ? - WHO are these 'brothers' ?
God is omniscient. He knows everything. He prepared a body for His only Begotten Son, Jesus Christ, to come and feel in the flesh, all what man is going through, while He Himself remains sinless, meaning, He doesn't indulge in sin. Hebrews 4:15-16. So, He eventually was condemned as a sinner- study Mark 14:51, the story of the naked young man. 2 Corinthians 5:21.
That was the reason Jesus's sweat were like drops of blood, when He got to the last sin He had to deal with that would condemn Him to shame, torture and consequently, a cursed death on the cross- simply because He was set up in the middle of the night, as He prayed, in the garden of Gethsemane, to be doing stuff the laws condemned with penalty of death, by stoning, but was cranked up to become death by crucifixion on the cross.
Judas kissed him, not a peck in the cheek but a full blown kiss, in order to set him up, but he didn't know his act was just a distraction, the people that hired him, already prepared a worse scenario- using the young guy that fled into the night naked. Mark 14:51-52.
Jesus Christ refused to tattle on him, nor did he ask them to go get him to speak for him, because He came for the very reason, to die for the undeserved, who, if and when they come to this realization, would immediately repent and accept the cleansing power of the blood that bought them. He even became their high Priest, who is touched by the feeling of their infirmity, understanding where they come from, but hoping they will come to Him and cast it all on Him, and take His Rest! He already made that call!!!
Will you answer, will you imagine what they must have done to him, with such a charge, in that day and age? All just to make atonement for every sin conceivable, including what you're struggling with at this moment! Give it all to Him!
Being mad at the preacher will not assuage your guilt and self- condemnation, and self torture and self hatred and self judgment. He already did it all- for YOU!!!
Which of these religious leaders who abbet them ever promised to pray to God for them. How can the blind lead the blind?
Anyone that has encountered God by the preaching of the gospel of salvation by grace through faith in the sacrificial death, burial and resurrection of Jesus Christ, and still remain unconcerned and unrepentant, has already forfeited his mercy, and grace that bought him from the devil, who has the power of sickness, afflictions, terror, oppression, death and the grave. No escaping him.
Let the love of God for you, in Christ Jesus, constrain you to listen, receive, accept, confess, believe and abide in His love, justification from all your sins, past, present and future, And live the new life purchased by the shedding of His blood, and by imputting God's righteousness that declared you "faultless, blameless ", before the presence of God, with whom you have to give an account, whether you like it or not! No excuses on that day, for God will definitely be Just and Righteous when He metes out judgment, and all mouths will be quiet!
For those who are confused pray and fast for those little details that have been left out or PG-13 covered from the Bible.(Just a little advice).✌️🙏
Excellent interpretation
Wow!
I had understood that Ham had “uncovered his father’s nakedness”. And that was the sin. But, I had not understood about Canaan. And, that Canaan was conceived by Ham and his mother. Now I understand. Thank You.
Makes sense to me too now. If Ham had been with Noah then no child would have resulted; so it had to be Ham's Mother. Since Ham was already blessed Noah cursed Ham's Child.
Me too !! I always knew Ham messed up Big time ,but this I've never heard nor read it with any knowledge that Ham slept with his own mother .....how gross Ham you sick puppy😲
He wasn't. It's a false teaching.
@@CandysYarnCraftsNobody had sex. Ham merely mocked Noah's nudity. Canaan was born after that from tainted loins.
@@blain20_Yeah curse someone's son to be slaves and servants for just seeing your father naked that makes total sense. What makes more sense is Ham slept with Noah's Wife, got her pregnant and Noah cursed the product of their unholy union. That makes sense and the punishment fits the crime. The Hebrew idioms used in this story point to the second explanation. When GOD punishes a wicked person his punishments match the crimes committed.
Excellent. I knew it all the way.
This is fascinating! Sometimes I don’t think i grasp the Bible at all. Bless you and yours
I used to believe the same thing until I researched Bible versions. The modern Bible versions are copyrighted. This means with each new edition, the owner has to change the Word of God per the copyright laws of men. The King James 1611 Bible wording is not copyrighted which means with each new edition the words of God have to stay the same and have since 1611. If charts, dictionaries or study notes are added, those could be copyrighted but the words have to stay the same, being preserved since the Protestant Reformation. Because of copyright laws, modern Bible versions can be full of inconsistencies and even contradictions. Read Lev 18 in the King James and it clearly says that Ham had unlawful sex with Noah, not his mother. It clearly defines what seeing the nakedness of different individuals are unlike the version read from in this video which like many other modern versions tries to hide unlawful sex between men.
I have found clarity from Gary Hamrick of Cornerstone Chapel online. He goes through the Bible with his church. You can pull up an individual book and chapter from the Bible on their website in their Teaching library or on UA-cam. Blessings on your life's journey.
@@gailkm9701 thank you
Shem and Japheth, 'literally' covered the nakedness of Noah after Ham brought it to their attention, so i dont agree with the analysis. Fascinating but clearly wrong, i think Canaan was cursed as he was to be the seed of Ham who had shown himself to be of no familial virtue, thus the undesirable traits of Ham would be perpetuated through his bloodline.
When reading the passage, it sounds straight and clear to me. I think Sam is reaching way too much into it, too dangerous for the ears of feeble minded.
That's why he said, there's 2 ways of interpreting it.
1: you read as it is.
2: you look at the language in how the author uses.
don't think he's reading at all into it. He's reading it exactly as it is understood in context of the later levitical law which is still all from Moses. Reading it in English is what makes it seem like we have to reach for something, but in reality it's just a difference in the language
It went over your head dude…pay attention.
I was lucky enough to be part of a study on Genesis and this was the teaching and I finally understood the severity what happened and why a curse for just. Seeing? Someone naked in it came apparent that this was the true Reason for the curse of Canan.
“You can read this” spiritually speaking, as I spend time time with you. I will definitely see your faults and shortcomings as well as my.
Life and death are in the power of the tongue.
If Ham unconcovered his father's nakedness meaning that he 😴 with him , then what does it mean that Shem and Japhet covered their father's nakedness?
I think it means they came to their mother's rescue after she was raped by Ham
So " his father's nakedness".......means the wife. And to "uncover his father's nakedness" means to have sexual relations with his wife
So to "cover" the father's nakedness, should mean to not have sexual relations with the wife. If we are being consistent with the logic. So lets put it together.....
Its says they took a garment, walked backwards so they wouldnt see their father's nakedness.
So they took a garment walked backwards so they wouldnt have sexual relations with the wife?
That doesnt make sense.
So niw lets separate the two.....cover and father's nakedness
To cover means just that, to cover. And they had a garment...so to cover with a garmemt.
And his father's nakedness, still means his wife
Put it together now
They had a garment, walked backwards so they covered their father's wife, so they wouldnt see any one naked.
That makes sense
Im just giving an idea, that makes everything still consistent and not contradictory.
@@user-fc9iq6le2g Exactly!
@@ChristOverAllJeremy As far as I can understand with this interpretation, Canaan is the fruit of that incestuous relation so he inherited the curse which was given to ham, and that’s to have sexual relations with close relatives
@@ChristOverAllJeremyno read again 'he was explaining Sam's second interpretation of his brothers covering noahs nakedness... Meaning his naked raped wife and mother to ham
I believe the "the nakedness of his father" by the the Wisdom of God The Holy Spirit means that Ham saw his father's wife naked and took advantage of her, next to his sleeping father, therefore Noah cursed him
It says Noah cursed Ham's son Caanan, not Ham.
That's the theological truth of this passage! Fact! Great job!
Wow. The great topic ❤ I would have another best memories with my pastor again with this topic ❤️❤️
So, if Ham saw his father's nakedness means he slept with his mother, why did his son's cover their father? It says in Genesis 9:23Then Shem and Japheth took a garment and placed it across their shoulders, and walking backward, they covered their father’s nakedness. Could it just have literal meaning? It is a difference between seeing someone's nakedness and uncovering someone's nakedness. Ham saw his father's nakedness and in Leviticus 20:11-21It says uncover. Ham did not uncover his father's nakedness, he saw his father's nakedness. So, even if it did mean what Sam is saying, that would mean he saw his mother naked, not slept her.
You're right.
The plain reading of the text IS enough to understand what went on there : the other brothers walked *bacwards* to go and cover their uncovered father.
Why would Moses give this precise info if it meant something sexual happened ?
The text makes mention of Canaan before the father shaming action of Ham, meaning he was already born and wasn't part of the action whatsoever.
Yes but why the curse falling on him ? The descendants of Canaan were certainly cursed, seing how idolatrous they were.
Making the promise to Abraham to inherit the land called Canaan, God tells him the cup of their iniquities IS not yet full, meaning judgement IS pending on the grandsons of Canaan.
Meaning Noah gave a prophecy concerning the cananites, which went to be fulfilled through the israélites. God asked them to destroy the cananites totaly, that was their judgement, for living in fornication and idolatry, owing to what Canaan did.
He IS a Hamite and has no business in Shem's territory. If you read the book of Jubilees, you'll get a better understanding of what went on for Canaan to become accursed (spoiler alert: cursed by his father Ham and brothers, i said Noah just prophesied, but better go and read for yourself, it just makes sense)
@@bbl5499 Thanks!!!!
I believe Sam is wrong about the 2nd view. Ham did not sleep with his mother. Ham was already blessed by God so could not be cursed.
@@alfdray2850 exactly
@@alfdray2850 Genesis 9:1
“And God blessed Noah and his sons, and said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth.”
King James Version (KJV)
@Genesis 9:24, "Noah awoke from his wine, and knew what his younger son had done unto him"
Ham is the second oldest son not the youngest or the younger.
From Noah's three sons, Ham had the last son amongst them, who was Canaan, the youngest or younger
There seems to be an untold story here???
The literal reading said, Ham saw his father's nakedness and told his brothers who were out side the tent.
You have Canaan being born of his father's mother.
The sequence of Canaan being cursed is after Shem and his brother having covered up their father.
So, when was Canaan born in this story, or was he in the tent with Noah, and the full story untold as to why Noah cursed Canaan.
That means, Noah named his grandson in his wife's womb and cursed him at the same time.
Or there’s a gap between the event and the birth of Canaan and Moses is writing a condensed version after the fact.
@@ChristOverAllJeremy You are too brilliant to leave an answer with a speculative ( or ) to me yes, there is a gap, but I don't see it as a timeline in Moses's writing.
Its the Bible version that makes it confusing. All the modern Bible versions are copyrighted. This means with each new edition, the owner has to change the Word of God per the copyright laws of men.
Older versions, like the King James 1611 Bible wording is not copyrighted which means with each new edition the words of God have to stay the same and have since 1611. If charts, dictionaries or study notes are added, those could be copyrighted but the words have to stay the same, being preserved since the Protestant Reformation. Because of copyright laws, modern Bible versions can be full of inconsistencies and even contradictions. Read Lev 18 in the King James and it clearly says that Ham had unlawful sex with Noah, not his mother. It clearly defines what seeing the nakedness of different individuals are unlike the version read from in this video which like many other modern versions tries to hide unlawful sex between men.
Also in Lev 20, the last 8-9 verses state that because of the abominations done by Canaan, God was taking their nation from them as punishment.
Ham was also the grandfather of Nimrod and Nimrod might be the evilest ruler in the history of the world because all the occult religions today still secretly worship him.
@maineiax I kinda see your point. The NLT version has Ham as the one Noah saw doing the wrong to him.
In Gen. 7:13, and Gen. 10, shows the order in which they were born.
Shem, Ham, and Japhet, but it's interesting how the story of Noah and the younger son is told in chapter 9 when in chapter 10, Shem began to have his first son two years after the flood.
@@willielee5253 Yes, The Bible is written in such a way as to take each story or event and scatter details about it throughout Scripture. The more we read, the more we connect the dots.
Just wow 😮 it makes so much sense 🤯 OMG!!!
I studied this over 20 years ago and this is the truth of the matter
He saw the nakedness of his father (literally) he didn't uncover it in the sense that you are explaining. This is false.its interesting but false..
He uncovered it by way of going out of the tent and exposing the fact that his dad was naked to other people. Obviously Noah exposed himself in his tent, but Ham exposed Noah's shame and the fact of him being naked to his brothers.
Exposing someones nakedness, does not matter how it was done. Ham was in his parents home without permission, and after abusing his mother went and bragged about it to his brothers. He revealed (uncovered) his fathers nakedness... remember the phrase, the 2 shall be one flesh? What ham did to his mother is the same as doing it to his father.
@@ronallens6204 that's not what happened.
@@ronallens6204 ua-cam.com/video/7FH0T9XS_ws/v-deo.html
I don't think so. Sam does bring out some good points, but I think he also leaves out others. First off, I DO NOT believe that it was Ham that disrespected/sinned against his father. Here is why.
Deut. 24:16 “Fathers shall not be put to death for their sons, nor shall sons be put to death for their fathers; everyone shall be put to death for his own sin.
EZEKIEL 18:20b The son shall not bear the iniquity of the father, neither shall the father bear the iniquity of the son: the righteousness of the righteous shall be upon him, and the wickedness of the wicked shall be upon him.
Now let's look at Gen. 5:32 it reads, And Noah was five hundred years old: and Noah begat Shem, Ham, and Japheth.
In the OT when births are recorded, they normally record them in the order of their birth because of birthrights. Notice that Noah was 500 years old when he begat Shem, Ham, and Japheth. I believe that these boys were triplets born in the order given. That means that Ham IS NOT the youngest and scripture says it was the youngest son that did something wrong.
The next thing to know is that during that time period there was no Hebrew words for grandfather, grandmother, grandchild, grandson, granddaughter and so on. Yes, there are translations that uses those terms, but they are not in the Hebrew. This was a patriarchal society and the oldest living male in a genealogical line would always be called father by the children and the children's children. So consequently, Canaan was the youngest and it was he who did something wrong against Noah or perhaps with Noah's wife according to; Lev18:8 The nakedness of thy father's wife shalt thou not uncover: it is thy father's nakedness. .
So how do we know that Canaan was the youngest son of Ham? Gen 10:6 And the sons of Ham; Cush, and Mizraim, and Phut, and Canaan. Notice Canaan is listed last which means he was the youngest.
This is why Noah did not curse Ham. Ham simply saw something happening or that had happened, and it happen at the hands of Canaan thus he was cursed. This is my opinion based on what scripture we have.
Interesting,fits well. So Ham saw what was happening and did nothing,indirectly approving it. On the other hand his two brothers didn't.
@@ginjordom6065 what was on the mind of Ham I am not sure. I assume it is possible that he held the attitude that you stated, but since scripture does not directly say that or rebuke Ham, I think that the shock at what he saw could have pushed him to share it with his brothers and they acted on what he told them. Just not enough information to put a fine toon on what took place, but whatever it was it was serious.
@@JohnSmith-ug5ci Yeah,gotta be careful not to add something which isn't there.
@@ginjordom6065 Suppose he caught his son Canaan in the act and was so shocked that he just stepped outside and told his brothers. I would have no words for that either in the exact moment, first thing Id want to do is get away and remove my eyes from the scene, FAST. Send my brothers in there to do something, my brain just cant process what I just saw. This is just how I imagine my initial reaction might be which would not equal approval, just plain shock. He didnt just not do anything, he went and told his brothers.
God bless you Sir..wow..
That's a good explanation. I'm surprised I haven't seen this pointed out before.
It is a good explanation, but its not quite true because the various modern Bible versions are all a little different...possibly by design.
The modern Bible versions are copyrighted. This means with each new edition, the owner has to change the Word of God per the copyright laws of men. Because of copyright laws, modern Bible versions can be full of inconsistencies and even contradictions. I know this has frustrated me and many others wondering who to what to believe.
None of the older Bible versions like the King James 1611, Geneva, Bishops, or Tyndale's are copyrighted and they are all basically the same being translated from the correct manuscripts, the masoretic Hebrew old testament and the Greek Textus Receptus new Testament though except for the KJV the older versions are in Middle English and a bit more challenging to read, though not impossible.
The King James 1611 Bible wording is not copyrighted which means with each new edition the words of God have to stay the same and have since 1611. If charts, dictionaries or study notes are added, those could be copyrighted but the words have to stay the same, being preserved since the Protestant Reformation. The new modern Bible versions are made from different manuscripts originally commissioned by Rome in 325 AD and were changed to fit what Rome wanted which was to unite all people under a religion of control and pretend it was Christian. Interestingly all the Bible study tools are used to define the modern versions and try to apply those modern definitions to the older unadulterated Bible versions so its best not to use dictionaries or read study notes because they might mislead us.
What did Ham really do when he saw his fathers nakedness? In the older Bible versions, Lev 18 clearly says that Ham had unlawful sex with Noah, not his mother. It clearly defines what seeing the nakedness of different individuals are unlike the version read from in this video which like many other modern versions tries to hide unlawful sex between men.