Dynam PT-17 Build Recap and Maiden

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 8 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 27

  • @BitgoHobby
    @BitgoHobby 4 роки тому

    Thanks for the great review. Happy flying! 🤙🏻✈️

    • @RCVideoReviews
      @RCVideoReviews  4 роки тому +1

      This is a really nice plane. Very good release for Dynam and Bitgo.

  • @deancooper5513
    @deancooper5513 4 роки тому +2

    classic yellow colours and lines, nice! I do like the blue and yellow colour combo on the PT-17 too, and this model seems to move along very nicely in the air.

    • @RCVideoReviews
      @RCVideoReviews  4 роки тому +1

      Yeah, it's enough. It's one of the first Dynam planes where I didn't want to either add prop or voltage. The blue/yellow scheme does look good. I was hoping for that one, but I like yellow too.

  • @rafaeltorres2886
    @rafaeltorres2886 4 роки тому +2

    So far watching your channel I've purchased four Detrum recievers and 8c TX I like what I see.

    • @RCVideoReviews
      @RCVideoReviews  4 роки тому

      That is a lot of radio for the money. Did you get some MSR66a RXs?

  • @airhammer6203
    @airhammer6203 4 роки тому +2

    The collective wind tolerances shifting through the bilateral side drafts can create auspicious landing characteristics..... but it might just be the stiff gear!! 😂🤣lol. Nice video review of the Pt-17. You can count on Dynam to make new model biplane. Hope they make more. AirHammer out!!

    • @RCVideoReviews
      @RCVideoReviews  4 роки тому

      Funny stuff. I like the way you scientifically dissect PERCEIVED failures of perfect landings and assess the blame to the airframe. My kind of thinking!
      They did a nice job with this PT-17. I'm very happy with it. No complaints really.

    • @airhammer6203
      @airhammer6203 4 роки тому

      @@RCVideoReviews It took a minute to think that one up in such a way that it made some kind of sense, even though it doesn't!! Just for laugh's anyway 👍👍!!

  • @christopherbell1768
    @christopherbell1768 4 роки тому +1

    Very nice. Great looking plane. Very impressed with the quality of that wing camera.

    • @RCVideoReviews
      @RCVideoReviews  4 роки тому

      That wing camera is a little Runcam2. I've had that camera for quite a while. It's been a good little camera.

  • @tnrcpilot6895
    @tnrcpilot6895 4 роки тому +3

    Great, great video. Thanks for doing the grass ops. Hey, I'm the first viewer lol. Guess I may have to add to the Waco and Tiger Moth.

    • @RCVideoReviews
      @RCVideoReviews  4 роки тому

      Lol, it's hard to resist this baby. It's a really solid plane for just relaxing and tooling around. Decent sport capabilities but it's a gentle flier.

  • @garygullikson6349
    @garygullikson6349 2 роки тому

    I was about to maiden my PT-17 when I noticed Blenderm rudder "hinge" had come loose in my hot garage. I installed two pinned nylon hinges. It's usual to drag a wing tip during landings due to the tall landing gear, might be good to install a "skid plate" of some kind at bottom rear of wings

  • @IansRCExploits
    @IansRCExploits 4 роки тому +1

    Nice review of a nice looking By Plane👍😄

    • @RCVideoReviews
      @RCVideoReviews  4 роки тому +1

      Thank you. This is a nice little plane. Dynam has upped their game and I'm happy for them. This is a good product so far.

    • @IansRCExploits
      @IansRCExploits 4 роки тому

      Yes it does look very nice!! Fair play👍😄

  • @North49RC
    @North49RC 4 роки тому

    Great maiden John, gotta love a good biplane

  • @koalatails6391
    @koalatails6391 4 роки тому +1

    I thought you would have used a higher aileron rate, than do in the Waco. About 20%. I would remove or shorten a spring from each of the two tail wires. I don’t think they need a spring on both ends, having them flop around would bother me. The pilot should be in the rear 😁

    • @RCVideoReviews
      @RCVideoReviews  4 роки тому +1

      I think on high it's about the extent of servo travel. I thought about taking a spring out but honestly those little plastic connectors are *tiny* so I don't think they were meant to have any real tension. I'll try it to see, but the plane flew twice and they're still on there.
      I can't win with the pilot :)

  • @mikegreene9215
    @mikegreene9215 4 роки тому +1

    Looking really good. I did see your first video on it as well. Curious what the overall assembly time was, 2hrs?

    • @RCVideoReviews
      @RCVideoReviews  4 роки тому +1

      That sounds about right. You screw the wings on and attach the wires/support struts and after that you setup your radio. There's not much to this one.

    • @mikegreene9215
      @mikegreene9215 4 роки тому

      @@RCVideoReviews I noticed your nav lights blinked and on another video they do not. Is there an internal switch to go back and forth? Is the pilot considered 1/6th? Do you know what brand he is?

  • @looneytunes47
    @looneytunes47 2 роки тому

    if that was a Super Steerman with upper wing aileron surfaces id buy it. the Dynam Waco seems to manuver aliitle better too me and on mine i switched to a 12x8 nylon master air screw and its much much faster

  • @lasersbee
    @lasersbee 4 роки тому +1

    2:28... Just remove one of the 2 springs to tighten up the brace on each side.

    • @RCVideoReviews
      @RCVideoReviews  4 роки тому

      I thought about that, but I thought that would make it too tight. The plastic holding this springs is REALLY thin. I'll try it and see what happens.