@user-yl7qt4jm2d you know you're starting to sound like those idiots come who said that should have handled the 9/11 attack. First off, what Bush are you trying to blame, it's common knowledge that Donald Trump deregulated all EPA regulations and procedures.
It is a huge blessing that the military spokesperson, a woman in this case, is so superbly articulate and knowledgeable. It gives hope that the entire operation is capably run by adults, totally unlike the current US House of Representatives. Good luck to Baltimore and the USA.
These ships always _look_ overloaded. Doesn't mean they are. (Note that AFAIK none of the containers fell off, except where the falling bridge knocked them off; if it was overloaded, I'd have expected it to shed lots when it hit.)
If, it was overloaded and if the ship was previously unfit to do the job of shipping cargo. You can blame it on me deregulation of EPA safeguards and that the head of Donald Trump, he chose to be regulate EPA regulations.
Correct. There is nearly half a mile of fallen steel span lying in the river and nobody has touched this at all for the first two weeks. For sure, the area near the ship needs very careful handling and planning, but the majority of the wreckage is lying there waiting to be removed but nobody is working on it at all.
December.... Before dredged and open both directions..... 5 to 10 ft of Mudd will need to be removed before they can start digging for the new pilings...
Only once per year? The Dali was inspected by the Coast Guard last September so I presume they only need it once a year. For a vessel that probably travels(my guess) 1,000,000 miles across the globe via the oceans I would think once per month is reasonable. I mean if your car, truck or bus breaks down help isn't far away. In the middle of the ocean? Crew on board/ refers need electricity to keep food from spoiling, etc.
All i know is fire explosion appears at every point the bridge snaps at . And why is snapping at the top of the bridge when the boat hits the bottom pillar. Im just slow it down when the bridge snaps you would see explosions why nobody is talking bout that and why is metal exploding 😂😂
They are looking in the wrong direction. The first priority is to ask why the USA has so many bridges that are completely unsafe. No investigation is needed to prove that this bridge was unsafe. A bridge that falls down is by definition unsafe. It's a fact that ships will, on rare occasions, lose traction. For a bridge to be safe, it must be protected from ships that are allowed nearby in cases where the ship loses traction. What happened was that increasingly large ships were allowed near this bridge without correspondingly increasing the protection of the bridge. The Federal Highway Administration failed to ensure that this bridge was safe. No investigation is needed to prove that this is the case. Heads should be rolling at the FJWA but that is not what is happening.
Since you’re such an expert on bridge safety, how exactly do you propose that they make the bridge immune to a 100,000 ton container ship? I keep seeing people criticize the bridge but no one is providing any actual solutions.
@@bobsondugnut5985 Making protective structures for bridges is not my field. But I have enough common sense to say with fullest confidence that if a bridge cannot be protected against being knocked down by a ship above a given mass, then ships that exceed this mass cannot be allowed near this bridge until they are suitably protected.
@@jacks5kids Saying “If it falls down, it’s unsafe.” makes no sense because any structure will fall down if you apply enough force. You say “suitably protected”, but don’t say what that means. That sounds like you’re making a giant assumption that it’s even possible.
@@bobsondugnut5985 This is so simple: Ships can and do lose power. It is rare, but not so rare that one can afford to have a public bridge that is unprotected from a ship that loses power. Bridges round the world are "suitably protected" meaning that they are constructed so that they will not come down if hit by the largest ship that is allowed to get near to it when moving at its highest permissible speed for that location. The fact that this bridge fell down is 100% proof that it was not safe. And yes, it is possible, totally possible. Hundreds of properly protected bridges all over the world span waterways wider than this river. This bridge, however, did not have protection that kept pace with the size and speed of ships that were allowed near it.
@@bobsondugnut5985 Hundreds of bridges exist that are properly protected. You do not need to know how to construct a bridge in order to know that such bridges are the norm, and this unsafe bridge is one of several exceptions that are prevalent in the USA
are you crazy Why always useing the lord's name for any human errors wake up and read some cowboy books or something besides only the bible You sound looks a doomed propheter
Shipping company should pay for everything not tax payers
The government (We) pays for everything now, then they go after the companies and their insurance.
Crazy so much scrutiny on the ship but little talk about failure of keeping critical infrastructure safe.
That ship has had electric problems for a long time before this.
This is what happens when you deregulate EPA safeties and regulations, so you can thank Donald Trump.
@@doaver2.125blame bush
@user-yl7qt4jm2d you know you're starting to sound like those idiots come who said that should have handled the 9/11 attack. First off, what Bush are you trying to blame, it's common knowledge that Donald Trump deregulated all EPA regulations and procedures.
So Hyundai made the circuit breakers...my confidence has been renewed.🙄
Thats not how you play Jenga
The infastucture bill should take care of everything
It’s all about how much money you can make now that the work has started, six men standing around, saying don’t do that, and one doing all the work!
It is a huge blessing that the military spokesperson, a woman in this case, is so superbly articulate and knowledgeable. It gives hope that the entire operation is capably run by adults, totally unlike the current US House of Representatives. Good luck to Baltimore and the USA.
Well, this tells me nothing I didn't already know 2 weeks ago.
Godspeed to the Key
It looked to me from the very beginning that the Dali was overloaded.
These ships always _look_ overloaded. Doesn't mean they are. (Note that AFAIK none of the containers fell off, except where the falling bridge knocked them off; if it was overloaded, I'd have expected it to shed lots when it hit.)
This is why their EPA regulations and safety factors come but Donald Trump deregulated everything and this is what you'll get.
If, it was overloaded and if the ship was previously unfit to do the job of shipping cargo. You can blame it on me deregulation of EPA safeguards and that the head of Donald Trump, he chose to be regulate EPA regulations.
And they said weeks ago about the cleanup that they would be finished by May. No way on gods green earth that they will be done.
Correct. There is nearly half a mile of fallen steel span lying in the river and nobody has touched this at all for the first two weeks. For sure, the area near the ship needs very careful handling and planning, but the majority of the wreckage is lying there waiting to be removed but nobody is working on it at all.
December.... Before dredged and open both directions..... 5 to 10 ft of Mudd will need to be removed before they can start digging for the new pilings...
Why not use demolition charges on it?
If the ship was having issues, why did the captain think it was a good idea to start a 28 days a sea voyage?
Because the Chief Engineer told him all was OK
MONEY it's a hit,... Pink Floyd.. Pressure from above to "move ,move it"
Nobody wants to talk about the triple redundancy that ship has....
Hmmm...fishy! At this point I don't believe anything they say.
Cars require annual inspections, shouldn't multi-tonnage ships be required too?
Only once per year? The Dali was inspected by the Coast Guard last September so I presume they only need it once a year. For a vessel that probably travels(my guess) 1,000,000 miles across the globe via the oceans I would think once per month is reasonable. I mean if your car, truck or bus breaks down help isn't far away. In the middle of the ocean? Crew on board/ refers need electricity to keep food from spoiling, etc.
The indians did it.... Hurry people circle the wagons....😅
Captain of Dali should not move the ship, as electrical problem on and off several times, he must order to fix the problem before anything
Will never know the truth just like all the trains
China balloon..
Yet it easily steered right into the bridge supports.
It knew right where' to hit
All i know is fire explosion appears at every point the bridge snaps at . And why is snapping at the top of the bridge when the boat hits the bottom pillar. Im just slow it down when the bridge snaps you would see explosions why nobody is talking bout that and why is metal exploding 😂😂
I blame Gilligan
The millionaire
It’s is taking so long ? ....Call the Chinese....They will do it fast!
🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉
A.66.8
9
That ship was cyber hacked.
How, exactly?
I am so tired of tech illiterate nimrods making this asinine claim.
They are looking in the wrong direction. The first priority is to ask why the USA has so many bridges that are completely unsafe. No investigation is needed to prove that this bridge was unsafe. A bridge that falls down is by definition unsafe. It's a fact that ships will, on rare occasions, lose traction. For a bridge to be safe, it must be protected from ships that are allowed nearby in cases where the ship loses traction. What happened was that increasingly large ships were allowed near this bridge without correspondingly increasing the protection of the bridge. The Federal Highway Administration failed to ensure that this bridge was safe. No investigation is needed to prove that this is the case. Heads should be rolling at the FJWA but that is not what is happening.
Since you’re such an expert on bridge safety, how exactly do you propose that they make the bridge immune to a 100,000 ton container ship? I keep seeing people criticize the bridge but no one is providing any actual solutions.
@@bobsondugnut5985 Making protective structures for bridges is not my field. But I have enough common sense to say with fullest confidence that if a bridge cannot be protected against being knocked down by a ship above a given mass, then ships that exceed this mass cannot be allowed near this bridge until they are suitably protected.
@@jacks5kids Saying “If it falls down, it’s unsafe.” makes no sense because any structure will fall down if you apply enough force. You say “suitably protected”, but don’t say what that means. That sounds like you’re making a giant assumption that it’s even possible.
@@bobsondugnut5985 This is so simple: Ships can and do lose power. It is rare, but not so rare that one can afford to have a public bridge that is unprotected from a ship that loses power. Bridges round the world are "suitably protected" meaning that they are constructed so that they will not come down if hit by the largest ship that is allowed to get near to it when moving at its highest permissible speed for that location. The fact that this bridge fell down is 100% proof that it was not safe. And yes, it is possible, totally possible. Hundreds of properly protected bridges all over the world span waterways wider than this river. This bridge, however, did not have protection that kept pace with the size and speed of ships that were allowed near it.
@@bobsondugnut5985 Hundreds of bridges exist that are properly protected. You do not need to know how to construct a bridge in order to know that such bridges are the norm, and this unsafe bridge is one of several exceptions that are prevalent in the USA
They got this in Jesus Christ Holy Name 🙏🌹✝️🌹🙏 AMEN
are you crazy Why always useing the lord's name for any human errors wake up and read some cowboy books or something besides only the bible You sound looks a doomed propheter