ChatGPT Plus SUCKS! What You Need to Know

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 2 сер 2024
  • Three main reasons why ChatGPT Plus falls short
    00:00 Intro
    00:16 What even is ChatGPT Plus
    01:52 Limitations of ChatGPT Plus
    01:56 Rate Limiting Issues
    03:02 Model Selection Challenges
    03:55 Simpler Tasks and Model Switching
    04:39 The Solution
    05:56 Conclusion
    #ChatGPT #AI #ChatGPTPlus #TechReview #GPT #AIFeedback #TechCritique #AIBenefits #AIImprovements #TechSolutions #AIReview #Chatbot #OpenAI #TechTalk #Innovation #AIAdvancements #TechCommunity #GPTInsights #SmartTech #AIApplications
  • Наука та технологія

КОМЕНТАРІ • 9

  • @gdedgar
    @gdedgar Місяць тому +3

    I get what you’re saying and you make good points, but I think this is ultimately a value decision.
    Maybe I’m not your audience, but I have a great time using chatGPT every day and the only time I run into a rate limit is if I spend a whole evening working on something like a world building for a story. It’s not infinite, but I wouldn’t say it sucks.
    I don’t mind using developer tools, so I’ll check out your next video to see your perspective better.

    • @MrDeSheikh
      @MrDeSheikh  Місяць тому

      It sounds like you’re able to get the desired outcome under the rate limit. Your prompts must be good.
      I agree, for quick small questions, its fine but for heavy use-case, iterating multiple times/ using pseudo agents, we can easily hit the rate limit.
      Just depends on what we use the models for :D

  • @Iammzephyr
    @Iammzephyr Місяць тому +1

    Honestly, I have encountered the same issues with 3.5 as well. It sucks to know that after paying 20 dollars/ month you still face the same " Ohh Pay Me More Money Issue". What are your thoughts on using other AI models that are powered by GPT 4?

    • @MrDeSheikh
      @MrDeSheikh  Місяць тому

      Yepp. Unless someone mentions that they fine-tuned a model or made a custom one, under the hood its the regular gpt-4 model which you are already using. The limitations still apply only just wrapped up in a specific prompt/system message.
      ---
      Do not pay for any AI services. Whatever they are offering, you could do it yourself if you want to save money unless you want the connivence :D
      Also checkout using Claude 3.5 Sonnet. It maybe better than gpt-4

  • @mathiasmuggli1162
    @mathiasmuggli1162 Місяць тому +1

    if you want the model to write programming code, gpt 4 is MUCH mor capable in my experience...

    • @MrDeSheikh
      @MrDeSheikh  Місяць тому

      Yes. I agree. For coding i never use gpt 3.5. Always the 4. Interestingly, majority of the time I get better results with gpt-4-turbo than the brand new gpt-4o

  • @iseptimus
    @iseptimus Місяць тому +1

    Don’t have an issue. Even with massive data sets.

    • @MrDeSheikh
      @MrDeSheikh  Місяць тому

      Nice! Curious to know what sort of datasets are you working with?

  • @RekdReation
    @RekdReation Місяць тому

    You need to understand how to ask the right questions. GPT is not "smart". It is not "AI". It is an LLM. A scrubber. A bottom feeder. It knows almost everything. You just need to know how to ask. BTW, 3.5 is good for most code and basic queries.