Philosophical assumptions, paradigms and worldviews in mixed methods research

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 6 лип 2024
  • In this video I discuss the question of which philosophical assumptions, paradigms and worldviews suit mixed methods research. Since mixed methods research involves mixing qualitative and quantitative methods, which are often associated with interpretivism and positivism (which are quite contrasting philosophical worldviews), which worldview do we choose? I also discuss pragmatism as a philosophical stance that may help us address this issue.
    Here is my video about positivism, interpretivism, ontology and epistemology that I mentioned in the video • Ontology and epistemol...
    ➡️ Feel free to ask me questions in the comments, and if you feel that you may require a more guided assistance, you can book a lesson with me through the following link drkriukow.com/qualitative-res...
    Also, check out my website at www.drkriukow.com for more research-related content
    Finally, my FB page is / qualitativeresearcher

КОМЕНТАРІ • 57

  • @qualitativeresearcher
    @qualitativeresearcher  2 роки тому

    Visit my website and explore the different ways in which I can support you and your study! drkriukow.com/my-services/

  • @unicornpizza7984
    @unicornpizza7984 3 роки тому +10

    this guy explained this better than my teacher

    • @dre13mer05
      @dre13mer05 3 роки тому

      I was stuck with my assigment. This is a great help! Thank you.

  • @el5991
    @el5991 7 місяців тому +1

    This is exactly what I needed to hear. Much of what you've said about the confusion in situating one's self as a mixed methods researcher resonate with me. But you've brought such clarity thank you!

  • @lisalin9658
    @lisalin9658 2 роки тому +1

    I am working on my research proposal, and, I am perplexed of mix-method study . After watching this video, I finally got the clear picture of what is pragmatic approach. Thank you very much, Dr. It has been quite valuable to my work.

  • @clivie4
    @clivie4 7 місяців тому

    Thank you....most people who try and explain this just sound like they memorised the books and repeat it word for word😅...best explaination yet :)

  • @carlettenorwood2935
    @carlettenorwood2935 3 роки тому +1

    Once again, you have saved the day, Dr. K. Amazing support here and you have answered so many questions and cleared up my confusion, saving me hours of reading. Thank you so much for making these videos!

  • @eugeniacontreras9117
    @eugeniacontreras9117 3 роки тому +4

    Thank you very much for this video. It clarified all my doubts about the worldviews and philosophical views. I was so confused!! I looked up literature but everything I had found was as confusing. Moving on now with my methodology. Cheers!

  • @otiebrown9999
    @otiebrown9999 Рік тому +1

    A Good review of paradigms.
    For example, all eyes can not be BOTH, a sophisticated control system, and simultaneously "badly adjusted cameras".
    Two world views, that can not be compromised - and make logical common sense of the eye's behavior.

  • @ycl8497
    @ycl8497 2 роки тому

    Thanks Dr. K., you provide great insight for my DBR!

  • @omersjjd
    @omersjjd 3 роки тому

    What a lovely way to describe pragmatism. Thank you Dr Kriukow!

  • @jiayinruan9282
    @jiayinruan9282 2 роки тому

    Thank you very much!! So clear explanations!! help a lot!

  • @stellaagbaeroh6072
    @stellaagbaeroh6072 2 роки тому

    This was very clear and understandable. Thanks Dr.

  • @hafssaboutaib3468
    @hafssaboutaib3468 3 роки тому

    Thank you for these clarifications

  • @jing5924
    @jing5924 2 роки тому

    Thanks for the video! Love it

  • @Linda-dc7rl
    @Linda-dc7rl 2 роки тому

    you are brilliant. thank you so much!

  • @mariamabukhamdi-stava4724
    @mariamabukhamdi-stava4724 2 роки тому

    THANK YOU so much for your video's excellent explanations of those difficult terms. I was so lost and confused but you made all the puzzle pieces come together.

  • @sarahcurrie375
    @sarahcurrie375 2 роки тому

    Once again, so helpful! I am conducting mixed methods research for my postgraduate degree and you explanation of pragmatism has helped me tremendously. Thank you 😊

  • @vgomz
    @vgomz 11 місяців тому

    You have save my life! Thank youuuuu! :')

  • @diane5140
    @diane5140 Рік тому

    Thank you, Dr. K! This is very useful for the paper that I am currently writing. Cheers!

  • @anamtoqeer1978
    @anamtoqeer1978 2 роки тому

    Wonderful explanation!!! 👍

  • @rowelm3480
    @rowelm3480 2 роки тому

    One of the best explanation re pragmatism. It was the easiest to understand

  • @nenanalakhras8924
    @nenanalakhras8924 3 роки тому

    You are wonderful Dr ,really it's informative tips to understand this topic

  • @mcoo4250
    @mcoo4250 2 роки тому

    Thank you for this video, extremely helpful🌟🙏

  • @nonhlanhlametiso8880
    @nonhlanhlametiso8880 3 роки тому

    Thanks that was helpful

  • @pjgdba306
    @pjgdba306 3 роки тому

    Great share, very supportive. I am doing a study of transformative learning in undergrad degree programs in the US. Is it happening, at all? When it is, what is/are the source(s). Does "serious simulation" factor into transformative learning? How does Openness to Experience factor into transformative learning experiences?

  • @genetgebre3041
    @genetgebre3041 Рік тому

    Thanks a lot

  • @TheSanju987654
    @TheSanju987654 2 роки тому

    You have given an amazing explanation. It makes a lot of sense to use Pragmatism in mixed methods research. However, there are many other worldviews that are suitable for mixed methods. Please make videos on transformative, critical realism, postmodernism, yin-yang, dialectical pluralism, and performative paradigms. Please also explain the context in which these worldviews can be used. Thank you for creating good videos.

  • @roamwithash833
    @roamwithash833 Рік тому

    what about dialectical pluralism?

  • @magdalevin825
    @magdalevin825 4 роки тому

    Hello. I am on Proposal stage of my study. I would appreciate your input in the following: Study design is basic qualitative. Data collection tools are an online survey and phone interview (open ended questions). My question is, given this information, can my study still be qualitative in nature and use the data from the survey to inform and complement the data collected through the phone interviews? I appreciate any input!

    • @anuradhasaikia9305
      @anuradhasaikia9305 3 роки тому

      Hii. your study is qualitative as it is a exploratory in nature.But after the survey response if you put it on a model, it will be quantitative.

  • @suzannehares5339
    @suzannehares5339 4 роки тому

    Do you have any recommended literature for pragmatism?

    • @cesarrcanova
      @cesarrcanova 4 роки тому +1

      Charles Sanders Peirce! You'll find it as "pragmaticism" as well. And take a look at Creswell (2003) as well.

    • @eugeniacontreras9117
      @eugeniacontreras9117 3 роки тому +1

      RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
      a step-by-step guide for beginners

  • @shahidakhanom3772
    @shahidakhanom3772 Рік тому

    Could you please mention any reference?

  • @Venusgem
    @Venusgem 2 роки тому

    Start real at 4.55

  • @sonamdagay334
    @sonamdagay334 2 роки тому

    Can case study research be pragmatism?

    • @qualitativeresearcher
      @qualitativeresearcher  2 роки тому +1

      it definitely can, if you convincingly justify this

    • @sonamdagay334
      @sonamdagay334 2 роки тому

      @@qualitativeresearchermany thanks for the clarification. I am doing my dissertation with the aim to design a road map for decarbonisation in a particular organisation. I am not sure if that would fit into a pragmatic research with a case study strategy?

    • @qualitativeresearcher
      @qualitativeresearcher  2 роки тому

      @@sonamdagay334 this will depend on your worldview and on your chosen methods mainly

    • @sonamdagay334
      @sonamdagay334 2 роки тому

      @@qualitativeresearcher many thanks

  • @ManojJinadasa
    @ManojJinadasa 3 роки тому

    pls. pls .pls teach on a medium angle camara shot. If not, this is communicatively disturbing to audience

    • @qualitativeresearcher
      @qualitativeresearcher  3 роки тому

      Does the "medium angle" refer to the height of the camera or the distance ? I don't know these terms :)