How does the discovery of dinosaur polymers by a deist scientist provide evidence of a young earth? Even if dinosaurs lived more recently, how does it prove the existence of a cosmic Jewish zombie?
@@AeroZeppelin-rb4pt No, life gets much better without worrying about crap like hell and and a wrathful sky god. Psychology, the humanities, and science is the path to a better life.
@@vilicus77 not at all it's the bottom of the barrel and no Christian worrys or your not a Christian we get peace that passes all understanding you get the worrying and like all ungodly people you have everything inverted like your father satan . We have an all loving Power God and it doesn't matter whatever WHATEVER may happen to us we are GOLDEN SET for eternity you can't say the same and when sickness death war and all negativity hits us and earth Christian are anchored on the rock that is christ . You guys have nothing you come from nothing for nothing and might makes right .
This reminds me of a verse from the Holy Bible, in the book of Luke chapter 19 verses 37-40 the people that Jesus was teaching along with his disciples were joyfully praising God when the Pharisees told Jesus to rebuke his disciples, Jesus replied if they keep quiet the rocks will cry out, it would appear as though Jesus was right, many people no longer praise God or believe in the creator, and it appears as though the rocks are starting to cry out, dinosaurs didn't die off millions of years ago as science would imply and man did not evolve from an ancient primate, we are a created being and you will be held accountable for not accepting Jesus, and the truth that is staring you in the face every day, when we look upon the world around us we see a design, which implies there must be a designer, a creator, our Lord and savior Jesus the Christ, who told us that he was the creator, stating all things were created for his glory, all things were created by him and for him.
Couldn’t have said it better myself. The people that want to credit some alien race, for seeding the Earth, will stand before Jesus, and have to tell Him, face to face, that they denied Him. I wouldn’t want to be in their shoes. Creation screams a Creator, and people deny Him, still.
@@kmaterne That's the part that blows my mind the evidence of creation is everywhere, yet people don't believe, the Bible has told the end from the beginning, prophecy after prophecy has been fulfilled, yet people deny the truth. I pray people find him while they have time, so they don't have to stand before him and hear depart from me.
@@zj-all2976 While i do not agree with the intent of the OP, i would not say they are any more insane than believing time itself began at the moment of the Big Bang. While i agree with a lot of the theory, i think it's insane to think that. In order for something to come from nothing, there had to be a tick of time. Therefore, time could not be created with the big bang since a moment of time must pass for the big bang to begin in the first place.
Wishful thinking, nothing more... This issue is quite a few years old now and the scientific explanations are well known to those genuinely interested in this subject. No Young Earth Creatardism needed... Christains brought about The European Dark Age, Creatard.
I've had some contact with both science and Hollywood. I once said, what can happen to you in science is worse than what can happen to you in Hollywood. In spite of everything, I obviously have kept my sense of humor through it all.
@@dav1djac0b you do not exist, you are only a figment of your own imagination, kinda like a nightmare. So in your eyes, nothing is true or real. HISTORY was written so the young ones don't have to go through the nonsense. That they learned from.
@@dav1djac0b Exactly, everything was just bigger and it de-evolutionized. We see fossils of giant dragon flies with 6 foot wingspans and can't put two and two together? We are simply living a lie. A lie the wealthy people of the world want to keep because they will lose their standing and respect. Feeding us truth, or accepting it, in baby steps keeps the quackadamian argument alive. Makes them feel important. Little do they know, it's the realization and acceptance of new found truths that keeps their respectful standings. Some idiots think there is no more to learn about who, what, when, and how...anything. All they want is a dumbed down populous that takes treats like a puppy.
OK maybe he is but even science makes mistakes the bottom line is you should never jump to conclusions Santa you got all the facts not half of them not a fraction of them all of them
it is so sad that even in the 21st century, some people believe that humanity evolved from pond scum and want others to believe that because ... "science."
"The god of this age has blinded the minds of unbelievers, so that they cannot see the light of the gospel that displays the glory of Christ, who is the image of God" For it is written: “I will destroy the wisdom of the wise, the intelligence of the intelligent I will frustrate"
@Spacecattle Thank you for bothering to respond. However you are sleeping and need to wake up. Look around you and take note of the times we are in and do not scoff at God. He is not just 'my' God. He is yours too, whether you acknowledge him or not. He knows and is aware of you, even if you do not know him and time is running out to pay attention to his voice.
I remember when the Prof. from N.C. State came out w/her report on this soft tissue found in a fossil. I got the impression her friends on the evolution band wagon were not happy that this info was made public. So she stayed true to form by saying publicly that now they needed to study why this tissue was still soft after 50-60 million yrs. This is one the "evolutionists" can not get around but they will keep trying to make excuses until the very end. Thanks for these series of videos that you have put together. VIA CON DIAS !!!
Does the Professor from N.C. State have a name? I know you can't mean Mary Higby Schweitzer, as she is not a professor. You impressions are wrong if you are referring to Schweitzer and despite being a devote Christian, she was upset that religious extremists like you, misused her scientific work. You should feel ashamed!
@@carlfrups948 Misuse it how, by wondering why all the evolutionists denied for so long that soft tissue even existed in dino bones? When Schweitzer asked them what evidence would convince them it was true, one even said absolutely none. Schweitzer said she was excoriated by her fellow evolutionists, though she is one herself. So save your shaming for those anti science scientists who viscerally react when inconvenient evidence against their paradigm surfaces that they have no answer for. You fault creationists for embracing evidence when it supports their view. Yet evolutionists constantly do the same. They have even created many hoaxes to try to support their theory, such as Piltdown man , Haekle's embryos, Java man, Nebraska man, etc.
@jeremiah sams Actually, I omitted many more, but yes, Lucy is worse because they are still using it, depicted with human hands and feet, even after finding more intact fossil "Lucys" with ape feet.
@@acutelogic2353 You live in a fantasy world and you are very selective when choosing to display evidence and sometimes you lie, to make it fit your religious cult. Schweitzer was quite public about how disappointed religious extremists misrepresented her work in science., but somehow you forgot to mention that. There is no doubt that mistakes are made and in some case frauds, like with the Piltdown Man, but these are exposed. This is not done by religious extremists like you, or creationist money hungry organisations like ICR, Hovind or AiG, but by people like me. As for australopithecus afarensis, we now have +300 fossils and we know that they did not have "ape feet", but I guess that you find it ok to lie to promote your religious extremism. Reality is that there are hundreds of Christian universities in the US alone, with an estimated 3.5 million students and billions in research funds and not one has managed to refute the scientific theory of evolution. There are dedicated research funds for projects dedicated to challenge the evolutionary theory and still nothing has been presented. In the past 25 years, large creationist organisations have had +100 million US$ at their disposal and employed their own scientists and not one relevant paper has been published, refuting evolution. So in essence, despite billions at their disposal, millions of academics and 50 years of research, nothing of scientific value has been presented. This is the reality that you don't want to see...
@@acutelogic2353 I thought the people that came up with the piltdown man were actually religious christian fanatics, I understand they did it to make evolution seem false. But it backfired on them and just proved that christianity is a lie. It goes to show what these people will do to prove their lies.
More and more powerful evidence of creation appears every year. Coincidence? I don’t think so. I think our Creator has a smile listening to this. Listening to people following His call to shine a light on His truth.☝️😇
@@soupey Not sure why my previous two replies to you vanished but here goes number three. Check out Ithasbeenwritten a dot com site for much evidence. Take care, B.
@@andykeating791 Ha Ha you are just like the evolutionists, you want to throw out the evidence because it doesn't fit "the theory" (yes it's just a theory). Well guess what, the whole evolution idea is about to get tossed out the window. Mama always said "lies catch up wit ya". What kind of "science" throws away evidence if it doesn't support the theory?
Because they know their theory is junk. They’re out of reasons that man evolved. A logical person that even does a little research can see that it’s a lie based on lies. They don’t have anymore reasons to lead people to hell, by denying God. Evidence for Creation is popping up everywhere, and they’re panicking. So, they shut us away, and get the Tribulation kicked off.
@@kmaterne The harvest is coming, have to clear your minds of all negativity. Wish the non believers well and be on your way. Don't let them drag you down. We are all one soul split up on different paths of ascension to experience. Even the lowest of lowely people, the killingest of killers are on that same path. They are no different from the enlightened. It will just take them longer to evolve through reincarnation. That and calmness of mind, like the Hindu Yogies, must be realized to ascend durring the harvest. As of now, heaven and hell is on earth, will there be 144k of good pure people at the time of harvest to split this world into different realities? It's time Gaia evolves too!
There is no such thing as devolution! Only adaptation! Evolution does not allow for anything to go back to a less adaptive condition. Humans are no longer creatures of naturla selection. We have develiped ways of allowing non adaptive individuals to survive and breed. This is why Dawkins stated that we must accept evolution but not make political and social policies by it'd concepts. Otherwise you end up with a regime like Hitler's!
@Jamie russell. 100 % right, but GOD says be prepared to give an answer! Now, I know that verse (in context) means to answer biblical themes but one reason Christians cant simple questions is because they refuse to research scientific data IM NOT TALKING ABOUT THE CRAP THAT IS SPOUTED ON DISCOVERY CHANNEL OR NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC OR THAT IDIOT ON THE BBC,...BUT TRUTHFUL, CHRISTIAN SCIENTISTS!
Religious zealots dismissing overwhelming data contrary to their narrative while propping up anomalies that support their narrative. You dummies never catch on, do you. God of the gaps has been backing creationism up to the abyss for well over a century, and this will be no different. As if we won't find a scientific explanation for this soft tissue that coincides with the settled science. Very likely the outer layers of the fossil are created in a way that protects the soft tissue in the center. You also have failed to realize we have potassium-40 and radioisotope dating that quashes your silly attempt to erase our Earths extensive history. Nice try though....lol
@@kenhiett5266 Is that because you believe in the modern mythology that fish evolve into philosophers, that we're all related to bananas, and that meaningless evolved protoplasm somehow evolved to gain meaning and value? The problem is that you are ignoring the evidence around you. When you see a building, you know there must have been a builder. In the same way, when we look at all of creation, we know there must have been a Creator. Logically, you only have two options: 1) the laws of nature created themselves, the entire universe created itself in contrast to the 1st and 2nd laws of thermodynamics which contradict each other at the beginning of the universe (which is why you inconsistently believe in supernatural phenomena like infinite alternate universes), the earth created itself randomly meeting 122 precise anthropic constants (1 in 10^138 chance), life randomly created itself in a global frozen dead environment (faint sun paradox) *with no observable evidence* , at some point all the right proteins and all the right cell components formed themselves inside of a cell enclosure, the mass quantities of information in DNA somehow created itself from non-information without an intelligent source (all information in existence has an intelligent source), and that meaningless evolved protoplasm like yourself somehow evolved to have meaning and value including the capacity for symbolic communication, to be able to evaluate things as beautiful, meaningful, or valuable... among many other difficulties. Nature created itself which is logically (Naturally) impossible because it requires Nature to be preexistent. You also believe these things *without observable evidence* in contrast to the laws of nature and in contrast to the scientific method, but then you erroneously call it "science" anyway. 2) God created the laws of nature (Jeremiah 33:25), God created the universe which is why we see such design and balance throughout (Genesis 1), God created the earth meeting 122 precise anthropic constants which is evidence of deliberate design (Isaiah 45:18), God created life out of non-life including the instructions in your DNA which scientifically/consistently came from an Intelligent Source (Psalm 139:13, Jeremiah 1:5, Genesis 1:27), the reason we have no evidence for an alleged early greenhouse gas atmosphere, life allegedly originating on a geothermal vent, or the early frozen atmosphere which should be there according to the faint sun paradox is because the earth isn't actually billions of years old (2 Thessalonians 2:10-12). The reason human beings and life itself are valuable, and the reason we can attribute meaning to anything, the reason we have the unique capacity for symbolic representation, including a felt need to champion an ideology, etc.... is because we are not meaningless evolved protoplasm, but meaningful and valuable human beings who were made in the image and likeness of God (Genesis 1:27). The biblical worldview can make sense out of all those things that just don't make sense in your own internally inconsistent, existentially unviable worldview that keeps rewriting itself as we find more and more problems with it. You will only be able to "sleep like a baby" until Judgment Day. On that day your fine is due for every single immoral act you've ever committed. Every lie you've told, every time you've stolen, every time you've fornicated, every time you've dishonored your parents, every time you've worshipped yourself instead of God, hated others, been gready/jealous, or used the name of the Holy God who created you as a curse word, you have been building up a fine for yourself. You cannot pay this fine because everything you have has been given to you, including your body, your eyes, your brain, your voice, food, water, shelter, and your very soul. You will get the justice that you deserve. If you sin just 10 times a day, then after 80 years you will have broken God's Ten Commandments over 290,000 times. God sees you a thoroughly demonstrated moral criminal even before you started deliberately spamming this anti-God ideology of yours. "It is appointed for a man to die once, and then comes Judgment" (Hebrews 9:27). Will you be innocent or guilty? Heaven or Hell? "But God showed His love for us by sending His Son to die for us while we were still sinners" (Romans 5:8). Will you have someone to pay your fine for you on Judgment Day?
@@michael9237 You're making an unjustified logical leap. We don't understand the true nature of reality. Quantum theory manifests this fact explicitly. You are attempting to understand things we have absolutely no evidence for by using our very narrow Earthy perspective. We don't have anywhere near a comprehensive understanding of time, so the beginning and ending to things we observe as entropy in our universe could be nothing more than an interface of sorts running on a much more complex underlying operating system, (or extra dimensions). Given the strange quality of the atomic scale and gravity, this is likely the case.
@@michael9237 It's even worse than that, you make the logical leap to a specific deity. And again, you have absolutely no evidence for such claims. You're simply an organism programmed for survival. Genes don't get passed along very well without the mutations that give you this drive, so voila. Once humans became intelligent enough to understand our own mortality, of course we would apply this drive to an afterlife. There may be a prime mover, but there isn't a single joker on Earth that knows. Lots of insecurity and lots of wishful thinking.
Thank you for shedding some light on the dating of fossils and that science in no way is conclusive and supportive on all accounts on the popularized models out there.
@@carlfrups948 can the soft tissue survive that long under normal conditions? Please just answer the question. And please tell us how that can happen. (Just using your leanguage since you love science so much) there is no escape from being an extremist. Either you're a "religious extremist" or you are an anti-religious extremist.
@@gabrieljonathan3320 Soft tissue (just so that you understand, it is not soft when found in dinosaur bones), is not preserved for this long under normal circumstances, that is the reason why there are only a few examples this in the millions of dinosaur bones found. There is a perfect scientific explanation how it is preserved and we are trying to find out how it works. Google is your friend, so just search for it and you will find the scientific papers.
The dating methods are contradictory and based on presuppositions that are not provable, not scientific. C-14 is found in dinosaur and other fossils thought to be 10s of millions of years old. C-14 should be gone after that much time. Other evidences of dinosaurs and modern animals co-existing in other videos, books, magazines and technical papers.
This explains the state of those people: Romans 1:28-31 And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a debased mind, to do those things which are not fitting; being filled with all unrighteousness, sexual immorality, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness; full of envy, murder, strife, deceit, evil-mindedness; they are whisperers, backbiters, haters of God, violent, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents, undiscerning, untrustworthy, unloving, unforgiving, unmerciful; who, knowing the righteous judgment of God, that those who practice such things are deserving of death, not only do the same but also approve of those who practice them.
It is Romans chapter 1. They suppress the truth even when it is plain to them. “For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who by their unrighteousness suppress the truth. For what can be known about God is plain to them, because God has shown it to them. For his invisible attributes, namely, his eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly perceived, ever since the creation of the world, in the things that have been made. So they are without excuse. For although they knew God, they did not honor him as God or give thanks to him, but they became futile in their thinking, and their foolish hearts were darkened. Claiming to be wise, they became fools,” Romans 1:18-22
Can you imagine a hold field of scientists who’s life’s work is based on the belief that dinosaurs are millions of years old and how hard they’d fight to save their work even if it’s all.. wrong?
This is an inaccurate representation of how scientists and science works. A scientist who could show that any major paradigm is wrong represents a serious promotion of that group/ company, university to the fore. Science relies a lot on disproof. That is why we know the millions of years thing is correct. It has been attacked and challenged many, many times. It has survived because the evidence is robust. The nonsense presented here does not survive scrutiny.
@@ozowen Science deniers such as yourself need to consider that you have been wrong all your life and leave the science to scientists that will go where the evidence takes them...not where dogmatic presuppositions stifle further scientific inquiry.
@@alantasman8273 In what way am I a "science denier"? Is it because I consider "creation science" to be an oxymoron? If you look into what Schweitzer herself has to say on this issue you will find she has no truck with creationism nor with the nonsense they have spouted in regards to her work Better yet, read her actual research. Her research the scientific research she did on this subject does not lead to the idiotic claims made by creationists.
@@dimitrismanolopoulos5499 Most of their claims are idiotic. But how about the assertion that the find of soft tissue in the fossil means a young Earth. Logically that cannot follow as it is wholly insufficient to challenge the evidence for an ancient Earth. Logically you could argue a remnant population survived and persisted or that there is a means of preservation of tissue.
AS A CREATIONIST AND A CHRISTIAN I APPLAUD YOUR WORK AND SIMPLE STRAIGHT FORWARD LOGIC! GOD BLESS YOU! FAITH IN ALMIGHTY GOD IS BRINGING HIS WONDERFUL CREATION STORY AND THE FLOOD TRUTH TO THE MAINSTREAM! GOD BLESS YOUR AWESOME WORK!!!
Dinosaurs are fake, this is literally a script. The fact that they can pull out any rock and claim “this contains cells inside even though it looks like a rock”, and you sheep just eat it up is disgusting. The Gentiles OWN YOU WITH THEIR VAIN PHILOSOPHIES! They captivate your imagination and you become a slave in your own mind! THE REAL WORKS OF ART ARE ALL AROUND YOU, EVERY FIELD, EVERY MOUNTAIN, EVERY VALLEY AND SHORE, ALL MADE AS A FORM OF ART BY, YAHUAH, THE ALMIGHTY SOVEREIGN, IN LITERALLY SIX DAYS! This is a form of predictive programming. They can show you whatever you want to see, as long as you WANT to believe they are telling you the truth, THEY ARE YOUR GODS! IT IS WRITTEN THAT IT SHALL BE IN THE DAYS OF NOAH! NEWS FLASH, THEY WERE CREATING ABOMINATIONS AND MIXING ANIMALS AND HUMANS IN THOSE DAYS! ANGELS MIXED WITH HUMANS AND ANIMALS MIXED WITH ANIMALS! ALL SORTS OF DISGUSTING CREATURES WERE MADE! THE ANGELS THAT REBELLED DESTROYED THE BEAUTIFUL CREATION WITH PURE INFORMATION AND KNOWLEDGE OF DIFFERENT THINGS WE ARE NOT SUPPOSED TO KNOW AS MORTALS. They are going to recreate their abominations and tell you it’s reviving dinosaurs. THEY ARE ABOMINATIONS! WAKE UP PEOPLE, YOU’RE BEING DECEIVED ON A LEVEL AND MAGNITUDE YOU WOULD NOT BELIEVE WAS EVER POSSIBLE, ITS LITERALLY, LITERALLY!!!! A SHOW!!!! YOUR BLOOD TELLS A STORY OF WHERE YOUR FAMILY COMES FROM ALL THE WAY BACK TO ADAM AND EVE, YOUR WORLD GOVERNMENTS ARE AWARE OF THIS, THEY STOLE YOUR IDENTY AND DESTROYED HISTORY. YOU DONT KNOW YOUR ORIGIN, YOU DONT KNOW YOU WERE CREATED. GOD IS VERY REAL, AND YOU HAVE UNDERESTIMATED THE DEVIL AND HIS CHILDREN, YOU KILL YOURSELVES BECAUSE OF PORN AND FOOD ADDITIONS, INSATIABLE LUSTS FOR ENTERTAINMENT AND DEMORALIZING MUSIC AND FREQUENCIES. THE MOST HIGH GOD SENT HIS SON TO DIE FOR YOU, WAKE UP AND SEEK TRUTH, YOU CANT FIND OR SEE TRUTH IF YOU DO NOT HUMBLE YOURSELF AND SEEK RIGHTEOUSNESS THRU REPENTANCE AND FAITH, PRAYER AND FASTING!
@@7eamGhast actually, there are many reports showing these animals did roam freely during the time of Noah...as creations of God. Although some species could,have died out earlier. To say these are abominations, discredits,the bible and the creation account as even cave dwelling men showed they were around during that time. The fact is the flood waters formed giant tsunamis and pushed acrossed the western continents leaving animals in waves. This supports the bibles account. It also supports that God selected those from the kinds created that should survive...coming in twos to the ark. Again, your words bring discredit to the word of God.
@@acutelogic2353 Did you say "partially"? So, the DNA had probably mostly deteriorated, right? Nobody stated time as a factor. DNA deteriorates in environments that break it down and they do that fast. If the immediate environment allows the DNA to stay partially intact, we can't make any statements about how long that condition can last. The fact so far only one dino DNA has been partially sequenced means 99.999% of DNA has deteriorated. Spin is fun, right? But it tells us who has real evidence.
This is so dang interesting. I have herd many theories about life and the universe. This calls out so many questions about so much of what I have been told. Thanks for the time and research! I can’t wait to hear more some day!
@@owenduck That is completely incorrect lol the bible isn't even a theory in the first place. It covers far too wide a range of topics, many of which aren't related to science in the first place and are more philosophical in nature. And many of the claims it makes are refuted by science. Miracles, for example, are by definition supernatural and cannot be scientifically understood, proven, or replicated.
I find it so awesome that God wants to show us how He created all. the advances in technology, science, etc. point us to Creation and take us away from Evolution. God wants to reveal his making, and science is taking us there. It is so exciting.
I've never really argued with science. I've always believed in God. My faith is all I need. One of the biggest pieces of proof I've seen of God's existence is how hard people try to make us not believe. If they really didn't believe they would just laugh us off.
@@logicalatheist1065 He never said that it was proof. Of course you can believe in God and accept scientific research. Creationists founded science, after all. And so to claim that they deny it is absurd. It doesn't follow that they have to agree with every claim made by scientists, however.
Good to Grow , I Believe In God I also believe in Science but only to the point that man is still scratching its head as to what science really is. Humanity still thinks that they are advanced. Thing is, new discoveries are happening literally every day some discoveries proving what we “know to be fact” is wrong. Stand humanity next to God and your basically seeing perfection standing next to a bug walking around in a circle. Yes Humanity has made great strides but in a simply human standard. I believe Science, really pure science (something that humanity still has yet to achieve) is the work of God. God is the creator.
@@amechealle5918 I can get on board with that. When the Bible says the sea was parted and scientists say the wind would have to blow at this certain direction for this long at this speed I just laugh and think so science figured out how God did it good for them.
I personally believe that scientists who believe in evolution, must also believe that nature, naturally can make the eiffel tower. There is just so much intricity that you can say is down to chance before you show that your foundation of science is based on memorisation rather than understanding natural phenomena. Human biology is crazy complex.
My moms great aunt got fired from her professor job back in the 70's because she published some stuff that she found in Mexico , I think , I mean for years she couldn't even get a manuscript looked at for her book so she went to work at a private research company and got published many times ...
@@warpnin3 lol funny that people actually started questioning them and they all of the sudden discovered 90 million year old tissue like a miracle from god
@@diandirk3423 "funny that people actually started questioning" Are you sure that's how it happened? Are you being honest? I mean, discovery is what scientists are paid to do, and creationists haven't discovered anything at all.
@@carlfrups948 because tissue would not be there...would have disintegrated ....decayed away after miiiilions of years...obviously?...it is SOFT TISSUE.....and the bone Sweitzer found smelt like rotten corpse..it ain't that old🙂
@Kanikapila Ho'ohanai We say in the beginning God Created everything, you say in the beginning nothing created everything! LoL Who's believing in fairytales?😂
@@JesusisHere777 I know the Bible is true, I believe God the father, son and holy spirit. We've been lied to regarding evolution, and the big woopsie bang and billions of years.
@@scienceiswisdom8002 scientific "evidence" has to be tested to prove true. Evolution is untestable. We all use science. There are many sciences, but true wisdom comes from God.
@@garbicthan7457 scientific "evidence" has to be tested to prove true. -- This part is mostly right. Science relies on testable evidence to validate a theory. Even then the scientific community tries to find flaws in the claim, process and results. If they do, the claim is put aside or reconsidered and adjusted. If they can't disprove it then the claim begins to enter the pool of accepted knowledge, tentatively at first but over time, as more validation arrives, it becomes the current theory. Now, compare this to AiG's idea of a science paper, the kind they have in their own archive. To submit a paper the 'scientist' must start from the position of 'Young Earth Creation is correct' and then the paper must support that position. This is the exact opposite of science. The submission criteria are below.... ----------------------------------------- The following criteria will be used in judging papers: 1. Is the paper’s topic important to the development of the Creation and Flood model? 2. Does the paper’s topic provide an original contribution to the Creation and Flood model? 3. Is this paper formulated within a young-earth, young-universe framework? 4. If the paper discusses claimed evidence for an old earth and/or universe, does this paper offer a very constructively positive criticism and provide a possible young-earth, young-universe alternative? 5. If the paper is polemical in nature, does it deal with a topic rarely discussed within the origins debate? 6. Does this paper provide evidence of faithfulness to the grammatical-historical/normative interpretation of Scripture? If necessary, refer to the following: R. E. Walsh, 1986. “Biblical Hermeneutics and Creation.” In Proceedings First International Conference on Creationism, vol. 1, 121-127. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania: Creation Science Fellowship. Remark: The editor-in-chief will not be afraid to reject a paper if it does not properly satisfy the above criteria or if it conflicts with the best interests of AiG as judged by its biblical stand and goals outlined in its statement of faith. ----------------------------------------- Does that look at all like honest scientific pursuit? Evolution is untestable. -- Not true. We watch evolution in progress all the time, it's a bit slow, but it's observed in nature and in the lab. The long term stuff we can demonstrate through DNA and fossils found for many animals including humans. Shorter lived things can be observed over the course of a few years to change if their conditions change enough. So while it's not easily testable on demand we can certainly test the theory and say 'if man came from apes I should be able to find examples in the fossil record of the stages of development'... and we have. And this same idea should apply to other creatures, such as dinosaurs and chickens. And it does. We might not know what a creature turned into initially, but we can either start with the current version, or any of the past versions, and work our way up and down the development line. This is all thoroughly studied and reliable. We all use science. -- This is true. Either we use the products science made for us or we use science in our daily lives, like cooking. There are many sciences, -- There is one scientific process, but many scientific disciplines, like physics, chemistry, biology, etc. but wisdom comes from God. -- prove it. Step 1, prove gods exist. Step 2, prove the one you refer to as "God" actually exists. That's what all this comes down to, that demand for evidence before believing a claim. It's only right for us to want evidence for a life altering claim like that. But, no one ever provides evidence. And no, the bible is not evidence of this. The bible is a collection of writings, some of which are just reboots of even older stories, cobbled together to give religious leaders something to validate their authority against. That's all it is. And it was done so poorly it makes no sense. On the one hand, god is a jealous god. On the other hand jealousy is a sin. So... god... is a sinner. Pretty sure that wasn't thought through very well. Point is, if you want untestable, god is an example of untestable. It's even written into the rules that we aren't allowed to test him. When you are starting a cult it's good to establish rules like this. From page 1 that book is utter nonsense. I have read it. I was raised with it. I went to the schools, I did the sunday school thing. I went to church. It never made sense. Apologists exist to find ways to forcibly reword reality to kinda fit scripture. That is their core competency. I am pretty sure 'gods word' would not need interpreters to be understood, if such a being existed and wanted us to know about him. Peace.
@@ozowen5961 bruh, I literally saw u on another comment and they literally told you themselves that there is NO scientific evidence of evolution, stop bashing on facts because u refuse to believe in God
@@ozowen5961 bro, I respect you ok but in the Bible it says that he created man through the dirt in Genesis 2:7, and he also says in the Begining he created Adam, not Created a organism that transformed to man, but if by all means, if you do not want to agree, then we can agree to disagree
“What kind of king makes Himself nothing for His people? The Mighty one. What kind of king lets His people humiliate and beat Him until He is unrecognizable and is still able to hold His head high? The Merciful one. What kind of king hangs Himself on a cross for his people? The Righteous one. And because He has done this for us I will make my life a living sacrifice unto Him.” His name is above all others His name is JESUS!
Yet the Modern Pharisees do not know the spirit of scripture. Did you know that the true Flood date matches the date in science for the extinction of a very specific species which competed with Homo sapiens? They were the "daughters of men" which died out 27,970 BC. The time of Adam was far, far earlier. (Ref: *_The Bible's Hidden Wisdom)_*
@@user-hr8pz6lh5w And look up my books, *_Proof of God_* and *_The Bible's Hidden Wisdom._* There's a lot more going on than secular scientists and other biblical literalists will ever know.
Why do they find so many types of dinosaur bones in close proximity? sometimes even piled up. The answer is simple, a flood. They were moving to dry ground
That’s a problem for evolutionists. We have a fossil graveyard in the middle of our country. On high ground. Adult dinosaurs, that clearly drowned. Or, were buried in mud. They’ll find a reason to deny evidence. You can lead a jackass to water....
bahahaha you cant actually believe that. pilled up? dry ground? you do realize that not only is there no evidence for a world wide flood but its actually impossible.
@@arc001 The Holy Bible is book telling of God's existence and His desire for the human race. It tells of times when God spoke to people, in many different forms, and rewarded those that obeyed and punished those that did not. It is also historical like the creation of everything, Noah's Ark, Joseph's grain silos in Egypt, Sodom and Gomorrah, Red Sea Crossing, Mount Sinai, Ark of the Covenant, Samson, King David, etc. up to the Crucifixion of Jesus Christ and His Resurrection. Since the places, people and events of the Bible are factual and God is entwined within all of it, it is evidence of His existence. Do you think the 40+ authors and 2,000 years of writings with God being the main focus was a mythical god to lure you into righteous moral character? I think not. God is searching for people to live with Him in His perfect Kingdom, and wishes for us all to be there.
The Bible is poorly plagiarized from a dozen older religions. All the Jesus stories you know were plagiarized from stories about gods that are thousands of years older. You all are brainwashed
@@moodist1er The only story that could be considered plagiarized is the one about the Great Flood. But it is not for it is the original. For no one was alive except the eight from the Ark. Christ's virgin birth and date that we celebrate His birth does have relationship with other stories, that's all, none of it is fact. Here is a fact, the Messiah coming and who He would be and things that He would do was told of in the Old Testament years before He was born. There are 325 different example of this. Jesus meet all of them. It is said that to meet 10 of them, the odds would out number the stars in the universe.
Physicist Max Planck said: “A new scientific truth does not triumph by convincing its opponents and making them see the light, but rather because its opponents eventually die, and a new generation grows up that is familiar with it.”
Jeez Louise, read a book past the 3rd grade. Seriously, no one with an IQ > 1 thinks 1) Adam and Eve were "real" or 2) they played tag with T-Rex. The idea is just so....bizarre.
You are correct, there is an excellent video about it. It was pivotal to change my mind towards creationism several years ago : ua-cam.com/video/czDpqyGutTs/v-deo.html
@@smb123211 that is your unbelief at work. The so called wise and scholarly of today lack faith and knowledge, just like the Pharisee and Sadducee did in their day.
@@sandyo1063 Belief? I provided an explanation for soft tissue and what it meant No non-fundamentalist seminary teaches that Adam & Eve were "real'. Scientist know humans and dinosaurs did not coexist for one obvious reason - no piece of geological strata has shown a contradiction. For example, no dinosaurs after 60 million BC or fish in strata 500 million years or flowering plants in strats before 130 million years. If we found a t-rex eating a cow that would be different. It's sad / funny/ One man claimed, "One fossil was 52 myo but the soft tissue only 50,000 years old.!" I said, "But you just said the Earth was only 6,000 years old." LOL He later replied that dating "didn't work" (no explanation) so I asked why he accepted the dates he cited. A few months later I saw he was still making the same claim. (He never read the article that explained the discrepancy.
So first of all. Many people in the comment section here are very smug about the topic, as if it proves their young earth creationist world view. We get to that later. The actual topic is already decently old, over a decade. We simply assumed soft tissues would fossilize, since the rest of the bone does too. That assumption was wrong. It wasnt all that shocking, it simply taught us more about how fossilization works. Namely, the high iron concentration within the bone made for a good preservation environment. You can perform a similar experiment yourself. Take a lump of meat and put it on the table. Put one in an iron-rich fluid without oxygen in it, next to it. Let them sit for a month. One will have decayed, while the other will look pretty much fresh. In nature, the rare cases of bones which have soft issue inside of them were quickly buried by several meters of sandstone, and the soft tissue is only found in intact bones. Due to the rapid burial, the soft tissue had no time to decompose at the surface. Due to the depth, it was protected from water and oxydation. And the intact bone on top of it all means it was more or less sealed inside a container. Under those conditions you can find "soft tissue" in dinosaur bones. The "soft tissue" found in the bones is also not meat. I feel like people expect the scientists to have cut open a bone and found some intact muscles, or a steak or something. That's ridiculous. Read the actual paper of Mary Schweitzer. She found, quote "transparant soft tissue vesselt" [..] "which floated freely in the demineralizing solution". The last part of that description is also important. Like everything else, the "soft tissue" was mineralized, it only became "flexible" or "soft" after the scientists actively and carefully demineralized it. There is only one aspect of this entire topic that was problematic for any part of the scientific community, and that is the creationists and media who never actually read Marys paper, claiming she said things she never did, and making ridiculous statements under her name, which actually negatively impacted her carrier. How about any of you actually read her paper? I know.. that's a lot harder than copy pasting claims made by someone else who didnt read it, or the media who got it wrong, as usual. So much for the facts. Now let's get to your young earth world view. Sadly, that's still a bunch of nonsense. Let's take a look at DNA. We have been able to sequence DNA from organisms that died tens of thousands of years ago without issues. Even a hundred thousand years. If i remember correctly the oldest full intact DNA we sequences was a couple hundred thousand years old, and the oldest DNA we found at all was 2.5 million years old. In a young earth world view, how comes we have never found, say, T-Rex DNA, while consistantly finding it for any and all modern species? If earth was young, we would expect to find DNA for pretty much every organism that ever existed, since they all existed together, and very recently at that. Even if you argue all the dating methods are wrong, how do you explain that we can find DNA consistantly for what the scientific world view considers to be modern species, while we fail to find any for any species the scientific world view considers to be way too old? That's a funny coincidence now, is it?
As a biochemist, I can only agree with you, but you are trying in vain on this channel. Nobody here wants to hear the scientific point of view. No one will take the trouble to read some of Mary Schweitzer's publications, for example, although they are easy to find. They might be tempted to question their own fixed beliefs.
@@keatflores9661 Peruvian Ica burial stones and the Acámbaro figurines of Mexico along with other literature and artistic renderings of dragons seem to indicate that man at one point lived contemporaneously with dinosaurs. Just do a search of Cambodian Stegosaurus on a door post that dates to around 1200AD and you will see that we are not being told the truth about dinosaurs because they tie better with a young earth and what the Bible says.
"What Does Soft Tissue in Dinosaur Bones Mean for Evolution?" Darwin was in error concerning macro evolution based upon technological knowledge and instrumentation of his time. Advancements in these areas since then have proven his error.
@@carlfrups948 Darwin's Galapagos finches are still only finches. Thier beaks adapted to their lifestyle and the food available. You can't breed a Great Dane from a Chihuahua. Elephants only give birth to elephants. The DNA limitation to change is set by the amount of information originally present from which to select.
@@carlfrups948 You believe in this, yet you call another a fool: On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life "Preservation of favoured races... " This part of the book title is never brought up. I wonder why? Maybe because it has been used as support for genocide by wicked regimes since the late 19th century?
The denial that God exists is much more important to the deceits of Darwin than the reality that He did exist as the Biblical History proves to be harder to disprove through recognition that He is the Author of Science.
An evolutionist will never consider this video to be true and it has nothing to do with science. To accept it would require them to give up their religion: atheism.
Outstanding work! Most people are not aware of the many ancient petroglyphs depicting men hunting or fighting dinosaurs. And where did the tradition of 'dragons' originate? If God could create the bombardier beetle, which ejects a mix of chemicals out its butt that ignites in order to defend itself, why could there not have been, in the ancient past, huge reptiles that could eject a mix of volatile chemicals out of their mouth to defend themselves? Why not??
He was doing good until he claimed extraordinary preservation therefore 100% excludes great antiquity because reasons (bias). The proteins are altered/replaced at an atomic level at just enough a level that they are preserved just like how salt preserves meat and how formaldehyde, mercury and oils/resins preserves soft tissues. We now know soft tissue can in fact be preserved essentially forever under ideal conditions. Let's apply logic here... If the samples were only 4000 years old you would see not one but hundreds of associated biological molecules also preserved just as well and you don't. They would run hand in hand. Collagen is a special case it appears. When we get to the level we can identify the remnants of DNA base pairs and therefore get the letters we will be able to essentially run AncestryDNA type comparisons between extant and extinct organisms. We already know from Phylogeny and some old DNA how much is inherited from past forms and it's a lot (actually almost all of it). The relevance of preserved collagen to Young Earth Creationism is approximately zero.
What actually happened according to doctor Schweitzer’s experimentation is the fossilized T. rex femur was broken in the shipping process, the interior parts of the femur were tested and the parts tested were put in a mild acid to better test them and examine them, soft tissue was found, there were 3 options either the bones were young (not the case because the femur was found underneath the KT layer, there was a problem called biofilm (which was disproved through testing) or the soft tissue was persevered, which was the case. They soft microscopic tissue was preserved in a process were after the animal died hemoglobin in the body released iron Krystal’s which crosslinked with the proteins in the femur, and thus preserved the tissue through fossilization. DR. Mary Schweitzers discovery and experimentation is a perfect example of the scientific method being used to find out the mysteries of the natural world.
Another fantastic presentation. Thank you for producing this very fairly, without evolutionary presupositions. More proof that rejects the millions & billions of years theory... the question is are we willing to accept the findings, I for one is. Well done again.
@@scienceiswisdom8002 That goes both ways. You have to have just as much zealous faith in science to ignore the fact that it doesn't explain where the first living cell come from that evolved into everything, and has continually added years to the age of the earth to make their theory work with the exact same evidence that creationist use to prove the flood in the Bible.
@@bearthalamas9241 well abiogenises has nothing to do with the theory of evolution. how and what do you believe added year to the age of the earth and to make what work exactly? do not compare religious dogma with actual science, one changes with new information, one is perpetuation of stories told around a fire.
@@scienceiswisdom8002 You have to have life to evolve from. So they kinda do go together. No brainer. And all the evidence that supports evolution, is the exact same evidence that supports a creator too. Just different interpretations of the same evidence, by different ppl with different views. And evolution had to start somewhere. And guess what, they can't pinpoint where life came from, or how it got here, in the first place to start evolving, and they keep changing the age of the earth, it was millions of years old when I was in high school, now it's billions of years old lol. I don't know why you would even ask that. Evolution has already evolved billions of years in evolution years to 35 calender years.
@@scienceiswisdom8002 in my life time, or over the last hundred years, look up how many different animals have gone extinct. I don't see evolution, I see everything devolving, and animals going extinct at alarming rates. We're losing land too, look at all the ancient cities under water, I don't see the earth magically getting better with my own eyes. I see more of a de-evolution going on. The continents spreading apart use to be one continent. It's not getting better, it's wearing out and sinking, and spreading out. Science is just different men's interpretation. Not all scientist even agree on it. Theirs a whole community of prominent scientist that do not endorse the mainstream theory, and interpret the evidence entirely different. Scientist clowns like Neil degrassi Tyson want to defend evolution by saying catchphrases like "your not entitled to your own facts", when science has changed so many things over the last 50 years from the age of the earth, from all their missing links, missing fossil record for the last 1000 years, all the half dog half fish pictures in the old textbooks, and now your head clown scientist wants to defend evolution by saying only scientist can interpret facts lmao.
really amazing work this channel do,i was waiting for something like that to speak to people in sounding mind with good logic & science, God bless you.
This comports with the depiction of a stegosaurus on the temple at Angkor Wat. Seems likely at very least that some species were more recently existent than science is willing to admit.
there are vast areas of jungle still covering Cambodia nowadays but disappearing fast due to deforestation. i am hoping that the truth will literally come out of it!
Peruvian Ica burial stones and the Acámbaro figurines of Mexico along with other literature and artistic renderings of dragons seem to indicate that man at one point lived contemporaneously with dinosaurs. Just do a search of Cambodian Stegosaurus on a door post that dates to around 1200AD and you will see that we are not being told the truth about dinosaurs because they tie better with a young earth and what the Bible says.
"Soft tissue" is a very misleading term in this context, which can lead to misunderstandings among laypeople. The "tissue" found by Mary Schweitzer was fossilized, enclosed in a large undamaged bone that was also fossilized and which was itself baked into stone. It is hard to imagine a better long-term preservation. In addition, in the early phase after death, the iron from the decayed haemoglobin protected for decomposition. The material was freed from the mineral by a complex chemical treatment and was then reminiscent of soft tissue, as should also be found at this location. Of course, it is not functional, it is dead.
It's hard to believe that soft tissues would have lasted 5,000 years but it millions of times more difficult to believe that the soft tissues have lasted 65 million years!!!
Both would be impossible without a preservation method which wasn't found at the time the tissues were discovered, but we found cross-linking can explain the fossil surviving for millions of years.
‘You either have to reject the entire dating process, or you have to reject the soft tissue’ Here is where he really gives himself away. He presents a false dichotomy. Hey Dr. Anderson, what about that third option? The one which you’re blithely hand waving away, which doesn’t require rejecting the dating process, or the soft tissue? Namely some form of preservation heretofore not fully understood. Hey, a new, and exciting field of study! Let’s see what we find. Talk about rejecting a path of inquiry based on one’s personal bias. The preservation hypothesis is only just getting started and he’s slamming - or trying to slam - the door shut. Uhm, Dr. Anderson, I’ve misplaced my keys. I’m pretty sure they’re somewhere on my property, so I’ll search for them here. His reply is no don’t bother looking there. They’re most likely at the summit of Olympus Mons. In other words, No, he asserts, the hundreds of years of multi-disciplinary science on the age of the Earth are all wrong. The age of the Earth is either order of magnitude 10 to the third power, or the tissue samples are wrong. And we know that the tissue is good; therefore…
The real question is how do you build a calibration to test for 10 to 100 million when we don't have absolute proof something that old. I have done calibrations for 30+ years and you have to have knowns. It is imposable to calibrate on guess work. So they say educated guess and then say it is a fact. These are assumptions and hotly debated at that. Scientist are becoming politicians instead of using pure scientist.
I wonder what might happen on Earth if you suddenly cranked 4 billion years of decay rates up to a level to make them match a 6,000 year Earth? I'm sure the math is easy enough to finger out with a pencil so show your work. Tell us what happens. Then explain how to square that with reality.
@@moodist1er Are you sure about that? Could it be that these religions are plagiarized from Him? were you aware that Jesus Christ is not a religion, that religions are created from Him? Were you aware that many have bone over and debunked those accusations of plagiarizations and any attempt to use that position is old news and futile? Religions are made by men, designed to tell men what to think and do. You do know about Pascal's wager?
@@DrHarryT Judaism is plagerized from the ancient Sumerian religions and their ancient texts, Sumerians took it from someone else before them and so on. Christianity and Islam are branches of judaism, which means if one is a lie, then they all are lies made up by man. Research it, it is quite sad that you all think you are gods chosen people, when you are all fighting and killing each other over an imaginary being and an unfounded lie. And get this, not one of you even know it, because you have invested too much of your lives into this lie called religion. The story of Noah, the story of good and evil and heaven and hell. Quite a lot more stories from other religions have been stolen by christianity. Ttake the book of the dead for example, it was where the ten commandments come from, but they have quite a few more than ten commandments in their book though. But don't take my word for it, do the research and look it up. I've got nothing to lose by lying, but you have everything to gain by knowing. If you follow a lie, well that means you are living a lie. I think you religious people just too proud to accept that fact.
Very fascinating for me when I heard about this since I went to California State University, Northridge. This man was ridiculed and fired I think. I was also duped into believing in evolution. I became born again 10 years ago and God has open my mind up to the truth.
Fossilized (chemically altered) tissue to be clear. That's why it still exists in the bones. It's what the structures are composed of. Hypothetically if you take a piece of wood and somehow replace certain parts of the organic molecules of the cellulose with something other than hard silica that can preserve you will have fossil wood that retains it's woodiness but is still fossilized. What all this informs us is that collagen has a unique ability to have some elements of it's molecular structure swapped out in a way (maybe iron or some yet unknown process) that fixes it as is and arrests further degradation. That's the key here. People will argue definitions of "fossilized" all day and Creationists will claim it's proof the Earth is young because fresh collagen is known to have a short life EXCEPT this is altered collagen. Apples and oranges if it's about molecular interactions. Maybe we will have to change definitions. Certainly previous assumptions has been turned over. I would assume these are from bones deposited quickly in mud or some other specific mode if not quick burial. The chemists will eventually figure this one out because everything comes down to basic chemistry even biology.
This is an interesting take that needs consideration. The Triceratops is represented as having lived about 65 million years ago. Allow that to sink in...65 MILLION. That's where we have to start the analysis. What the scientist in this video shows is that there is elastic tissue on the surface of the bone; tissue that is being manipulated to "stretch" and which returns back to its form when released (or thereabouts.) Now, collagen (a most abundant protein) degrades rather quickly. We see its degradation in living organisms (humans) over several decades. Disease, lack of nutrition, trauma, aging can all cause degradation in the living organism. With this bone, or horn, we see tissue on its un-living surface. This horn, I think we can safely assume, was immediately exposed to things that we know degenerates will tissue very quickly, such as lack of oxygen, sunlight, air, dirt, bacteria, critters of all sorts. Unless the horn was buried very quickly (a rapid flood?), it would be a very real stretch to conclude that the portions of the external tissue were replaced, by, or protected by, iron or traces of zinc or some other metal, thereby allowing it to maintain its basic composition over 65 million years. Again MILLION has to be emphasized here. Even if rapidly buried, I'd have to see the research about what happens to collagen over time when encased in a hard substance, such as rock.
Dinosaur footprints have been found along side human footprints on various riverbeds...So none of this is surprising. When confronted about this fact, a specialist in the field stated that obviously there were dinosaurs with human feet....LOL
No they have not been. What people mistake for human footprints are dinosaur prints eroded by water. Those "footprints" don't even look right for a human foot. "When confronted about this fact, a specialist in the field stated that obviously there were dinosaurs with human feet....LOL" Why do you lie?
You are speaking the truth of solid scientific evidence in the face of the mainstream established line of reasoning. This takes courage and sacrifice. I commend you.
He's a microbiologist talking about a scientific field he isn't trained in and telling us to ignore the explanations of the people who actually discovered the thing he's talking about, because he's a creationist.
I remember hearing a story as a child. About native Americans fighting this bird that would swoop down and carry them away. It turned out to be a pterodactyl. They supposedly killed one and took a picture of it back in the 1800’s. It was considered an urban legend. I guess it wasn’t to far fetched.
Logical Atheist the story was told, it was never written. Not to mention there was depictions on walls of caves of this pterodactyl going back to the 1500’s.
Alan Thompson The preservation of soft tissue in fossilised organisms is rare but not unheard of. The Burgess Shale biota are perhaps the best known example. Mary Schweitzer's pioneering work in identifying a new kind of soft tissue preservation has been confirmed time and again since its discovery way back in 2005. It is no longer controversial. Just another example of a new and better understanding replacing the received wisdom. That's science for you!
I find petrified wood sometimes some of the pieces aren't fully petrified and I am told it's millions of years old .I don't believe that. Also .I find wood it is usually in one area like a big flood came.
I read you , I agree , if its real there is no need to fake it , if it isn't real , no amount if faking will make it real . The bible doesn't disprove science and science can't disprove the bible . To the contrary , much of science proves the accuracy of the bible . God created the heavens and the earth , he later created the sun , moon and stars , how could earth revolve around the sun , if the sun was created after the earth ?
I just got done watching a video of how Dr Schweitzer did her research on this off tissue. She was saying that the reason the soft tissue can be possibly preserved for a long period of time is the presence of iron. They were saying that this does something called cross-linking of the proteins in the tissue. I don't understand what that means but that's what they said. They said it makes it leather like. And that this plus the fact that it was inside a bone structure could be how it was preserved for millions of years. So what does the researcher in this video say about that? I'm not trying to argue, I'm trying to understand because this is two different explanations...
Well the usual argument that I have seen from creationists onto the iron preserving the soft tissue is: "No that isn't true! Nanananananananana I can't hear you...."
Funny how creation scientist can’t be correct but natural scientists are believed no matter what. Despite their biased presuppositions and extreme theories. Mainstream science stifles actual progress because of the money and pride.
I would peg it at 4,367 years ago that the triceratops in question died (2348 BC). I don't know how or even if he has attempted to date it beyond saying that it can't be millions of years old, though.
@@franciscodanconia3551 Really? The literal Flood date came three years before Egypt's sixth dynasty began and only thirteen years before Sargon the Great conquered Sumer, soon establishing an empire which stretched from modern Iran to the Mediterranean. Ussher's 2348 BC cannot be the Flood date, because there were too many people on Earth at that time. The problem with the interpretations of Modern Pharisees is that they look to the letter and miss the spirit. In their arrogant certainty, they cannot see with the Holy Spirit. The actual Flood date is something like 27,970 BC, which is when one very specific species went extinct. That species was deadly competition for Homo sapiens -- giving the world a special kind of "wickedness," "violence," and "corruption of flesh" that could never again jeopardize God's way upon the Earth after the Flood. (Ref: *_The Bible's Hidden Wisdom)_*
@@RodMartinJr Are you open to this, the missing 70 years to Adams died in that day sequence. For example those 70 years add up to 25.5 million years if we use Peters time table. But sin is six thousand yrs old. When Abraham and Lot kill Gilgamesh, and the other demons, Gilgamesh is simply known as the Tidal King, giving an acknowledgement to his history.
The length of time scientists claim dinosaurs and humans existed is a stumbling block for many people. Awesome job exposing the TRUTH. Creation and science point to it’s CREATOR!
@@lutkedog1 no they were deluded as it seems that you are. Science proves the Christian God true. The Bible has more text that has been PROVEN than any other scientific research in history and yet you still argue? Is that because you don’t want to be held accountable and want to continue living your life as you choose without consequences? Or are you like Christopher Hitchens who could be summed up like this. “There is no God, and I hate Him!”
Thank you for you work, I have been struggling with the concept of an earth that is say 7k. years old, I spend many hours out wondering the Nevada wilderness and have found many interesting things as far as paleontology is concerned, I have concluded that ancient Lohatan contained dinosaurs as few as 4k. years ago. Please dont get me started on 6 fingered folk. THANKS for you work.
As a child , my mother showed me a six fingered man once. He looked quite normal, and I noticed nothing until my mother whispered : "Count his fingers and toes" This happened in the late seventies in the village of Nieuw Amsterdam in my country Suriname.
The true Christian believes creation and a young earth because it is revealed to him in the Bible. And While the true Christian doesn’t need this evidence, it is nice to have. This is more of a testimony, to the unbelieving world, that God is.
Brovo, I always ask. Where are the scientists that realize the facts before them. Great job. Fantastic evedence, compelling speaker. This is the ancient planet im familiar with.
Not just that, but coalifacation happens in decades not thousands of years. I know this to be a fact, because logs in a lake under Mt. St. Helens in Washington state have already turned to coal. They've been there only 43 years. The coal deposits around the world are from Noah's flood. Therefore, there are no dinosaur bones found in coal deposits. . In fact, dinosaurs aren't as old as taught, however, they are proof that gravity is slowly increasing over time, causing all lifeforms to gradually shrink.
I watched a video about a certain civilization that depicted humans riding dinosaurs carved in stone tablets and this civilization was around only a few thousand years ago
This guy's understanding of biology is mind blowing! 🤯 Thank God for men like this who are not afraid to speak the truth even when it's extremely unpopular and could have serious consequences. Lord Jesus please protect him and get this message out to as many people who will acknowledge the truth of Genesis chapters 1 to 11 and come to a living relationship with the God who made the heavens and earth in 6 days!
That certainly is one possibility, but based on skimpy evidence. The trouble with biblical literalists (ironically both atheists and fundamentalists) is that they are blinded with their own arrogant certainty and miss an entire universe of possibilities that are far more likely than space aliens. True scientists have more humility and thus can *_discover_* answers, whether they are studying fossils or miracles. Sadly, even scientists can have big egos and egoistic certainty, just like the "creation pseudo-scientists."
You show your ignorance. The bible does not say the earth is only 6,000 years old. It does *not* say man and dinosaurs lived together. Some people take what is written ambiguously and declare that it makes a definitive statement, when it does not. Kind of like what you just did.
@@dancurtis461 "And the seventh day God rested from all His work." Six literal days and nights God created the heavens and the earth and man as well. And on top of that, it gives us a geneology from Jesus back to Adam. A pretty close number to 6,000 years. Your opinion means nothing
@Common Sense Realist we were also the most prosperous, safe, free, and free thinking and creative country in the World until the government and school started throwing the bible out of schools and started teaching lies of evolution and homosexuality began to be tolerated. This country is in trouble. Without God, you are too.
@Common Sense Realist Ad populum arguments are fallacious. Just because everyone else is doing it doesn't make it right or true my friend. *Did you know that the Theory of Evolution shares characteristics of a religion?* In 1981-82 in a federal court in Arkansas it was ruled that Creationism can't be taught in schools because "it is not falsifiable." With its history of rewriting itself every time we discover a new problem with it, what would it take to "falsify" evolution today? Hundreds of Living fossils? Allegedly millions of year extinct creatures still alive today? Discovering that numerous allegedly "vestigial" organs actually have a purpose? Finding fully developed vertebrates in the Cambrian explosion? Finding an alleged 70 million year old evolutionary predecessor to land-dwelling mammals still alive today with no signs of evolution? Young soft tissues in a growing number of dinosaur fossils that appear similar to 4000 year old mummies and the Tyrolean ice man? *Did you know that secular scientists recently debunked evolutionist claims of "junk DNA"?* ....or do we just reinterpret all of this evidence against evolution to sustain the evolutionary belief system? Should we hold evolution to the same *religious* standard? Charles Darwin said "if an *organ* were discovered which could not possibly be explained by numerous, successive, slight modifications, my theory would absolutely break down... but I know not one." Darwin didn't have access to the fields of genetics and embryology when he made up his theory of naturalistic evolution. *How did male and female evolve?* Specifically, how did the two separate, yet interdependent sets of male-female reproductive *organs* with numerous precision-tuned single points of failure, evolve by "numerous, successive, slight modifications" and still enable functional reproduction? Which gender evolved first, and how did it reproduce while the other one was still evolving? Going backwards in the evolutionary story, which of these critical organs do you reduce first "by numerous, successive, slight modifications"?
Interesting topic. Whoever is reading this and is going through depression, pain, loss, sorrow, fear and hard times. You will overcome dont give up
If you have God in your life you will otherwise good luck you better cry out to him.
How does the discovery of dinosaur polymers by a deist scientist provide evidence of a young earth? Even if dinosaurs lived more recently, how does it prove the existence of a cosmic Jewish zombie?
@@AeroZeppelin-rb4pt No, life gets much better without worrying about crap like hell and and a wrathful sky god. Psychology, the humanities, and science is the path to a better life.
@@ICarus-eu3jv It doesn't--but why should people worry about thinking and doing real science?
@@vilicus77 not at all it's the bottom of the barrel and no Christian worrys or your not a Christian we get peace that passes all understanding you get the worrying and like all ungodly people you have everything inverted like your father satan . We have an all loving Power God and it doesn't matter whatever WHATEVER may happen to us we are GOLDEN SET for eternity you can't say the same and when sickness death war and all negativity hits us and earth Christian are anchored on the rock that is christ . You guys have nothing you come from nothing for nothing and might makes right .
This reminds me of a verse from the Holy Bible, in the book of Luke chapter 19 verses 37-40 the people that Jesus was teaching along with his disciples were joyfully praising God when the Pharisees told Jesus to rebuke his disciples, Jesus replied if they keep quiet the rocks will cry out, it would appear as though Jesus was right, many people no longer praise God or believe in the creator, and it appears as though the rocks are starting to cry out, dinosaurs didn't die off millions of years ago as science would imply and man did not evolve from an ancient primate, we are a created being and you will be held accountable for not accepting Jesus, and the truth that is staring you in the face every day, when we look upon the world around us we see a design, which implies there must be a designer, a creator, our Lord and savior Jesus the Christ, who told us that he was the creator, stating all things were created for his glory, all things were created by him and for him.
Couldn’t have said it better myself. The people that want to credit some alien race, for seeding the Earth, will stand before Jesus, and have to tell Him, face to face, that they denied Him. I wouldn’t want to be in their shoes. Creation screams a Creator, and people deny Him, still.
@@kmaterne That's the part that blows my mind the evidence of creation is everywhere, yet people don't believe, the Bible has told the end from the beginning, prophecy after prophecy has been fulfilled, yet people deny the truth. I pray people find him while they have time, so they don't have to stand before him and hear depart from me.
Notch’s, excellent post. The rocks are crying out. Good call.
@@kmaterne it is funny how they can believe in aliens, but reject God. They believe we came from nothing, and then the world happened by accident.
KoolKiller Kyle - ... will stand before..
A vastly superior alien from another place who crafted the human race.
Same-same, son.
The "light" is starting to shine through the darkness! Praise God!
@@whatthearthur8660 w the
@@whatthearthur8660 more like, they need to😳
Oh, so you're insane?
@@zj-all2976 While i do not agree with the intent of the OP, i would not say they are any more insane than believing time itself began at the moment of the Big Bang. While i agree with a lot of the theory, i think it's insane to think that. In order for something to come from nothing, there had to be a tick of time. Therefore, time could not be created with the big bang since a moment of time must pass for the big bang to begin in the first place.
Wishful thinking, nothing more... This issue is quite a few years old now and the scientific explanations are well known to those genuinely interested in this subject. No Young Earth Creatardism needed... Christains brought about The European Dark Age, Creatard.
Some truthful scientists have lost Careers for reporting truth on soft tissue
I've had some contact with both science and Hollywood. I once said, what can happen to you in science is worse than what can happen to you in Hollywood. In spite of everything, I obviously have kept my sense of humor through it all.
Dinosaurs did not exist. They’re a hoax.
@@dav1djac0b you do not exist, you are only a figment of your own imagination, kinda like a nightmare. So in your eyes, nothing is true or real. HISTORY was written so the young ones don't have to go through the nonsense. That they learned from.
@@dav1djac0b Exactly, everything was just bigger and it de-evolutionized. We see fossils of giant dragon flies with 6 foot wingspans and can't put two and two together? We are simply living a lie. A lie the wealthy people of the world want to keep because they will lose their standing and respect. Feeding us truth, or accepting it, in baby steps keeps the quackadamian argument alive. Makes them feel important. Little do they know, it's the realization and acceptance of new found truths that keeps their respectful standings. Some idiots think there is no more to learn about who, what, when, and how...anything. All they want is a dumbed down populous that takes treats like a puppy.
@Jim Agnew what?
I don’t speak cognitive dissonance, sorry. man up & get over it.
Even to an old man with no knowledge of such science, this presentation is most exciting and educational. Thanks.
Keep looking, there is alot more out there
Go to northwestern creation on utube..a whole lot there
you would have to have zero knowledge of science to believe anything on this Chanel.
@@scienceiswisdom8002 What then are you doing here on this channel with your vast knowledge of science?
@@scienceiswisdom8002 Stop and ask yourself; could that possibly be because science is an indoctrination camp?
Extremely well done presentation by this scientist. Straight forward and very articulate. Most compelling presentation I've ever seen.
It's just a shame he's trained in the wrong scientific field, really.
@@Captain-Obvious1 No he is not
OK maybe he is but even science makes mistakes the bottom line is you should never jump to conclusions Santa you got all the facts not half of them not a fraction of them all of them
@@jamessparkman6604 ...Spoken as someone who thinks the earth is 6k years old, right?
@@Captain-Obvious1 Who knows it because it’s true the evidence is clearly in the fossils just ask science
Del did a fantastic job as the series' guide. He really made each segment seem as though it were the most important.
At last! The truth has come to light 💡 keep up the good work. Brilliant.
Or sloppy thinking, jumping to unfounded conclusions -- something scientific method and God's humility would have us avoid.
it is so sad that even in the 21st century, some people believe that humanity evolved from pond scum and want others to believe that because ... "science."
Truth always shines!
"The god of this age has blinded the minds of unbelievers, so that they cannot see the light of the gospel that displays the glory of Christ, who is the image of God"
For it is written:
“I will destroy the wisdom of the wise, the intelligence of the intelligent I will frustrate"
Yes, and I suspect he was also referring to the "wisdom" of the Modern Pharisees who also take scripture literally and miss the spirit of it.
@Spacecattle Thank you for bothering to respond. However you are sleeping and need to wake up. Look around you and take note of the times we are in and do not scoff at God. He is not just 'my' God. He is yours too, whether you acknowledge him or not. He knows and is aware of you, even if you do not know him and time is running out to pay attention to his voice.
Spacecattle, wipe that smegma off your face!😂
Election summed up.
@@RodMartinJr among others yes, but not exclusively.
So great! As a biochemist myself, I sure appreciate the honest take on the soft tissue issue!
Honest?! The soft tissue issue was explained by scientists in 2013!
How is this "honest "?
The word does NOT mean "agrees with me".
If you're a biochemist (LOL) I'm a Martian!
@Σά ββας
And that joke matters because....
@@Pikkabuu what was the explanation?
I remember when the Prof. from N.C. State came out w/her report on this soft tissue found in a fossil. I got the impression her friends on the evolution band wagon were not happy that this info was made public. So she stayed true to form by saying publicly that now they needed to study why this tissue was still soft after 50-60 million yrs. This is one the "evolutionists" can not get around but they will keep trying to make excuses until the very end. Thanks for these series of videos that you have put together. VIA CON DIAS !!!
Does the Professor from N.C. State have a name? I know you can't mean Mary Higby Schweitzer, as she is not a professor. You impressions are wrong if you are referring to Schweitzer and despite being a devote Christian, she was upset that religious extremists like you, misused her scientific work. You should feel ashamed!
@@carlfrups948 Misuse it how, by wondering why all the evolutionists denied for so long that soft tissue even existed in dino bones? When Schweitzer asked them what evidence would convince them it was true, one even said absolutely none. Schweitzer said she was excoriated by her fellow evolutionists, though she is one herself. So save your shaming for those anti science scientists who viscerally react when inconvenient evidence against their paradigm surfaces that they have no answer for. You fault creationists for embracing evidence when it supports their view. Yet evolutionists constantly do the same. They have even created many hoaxes to try to support their theory, such as Piltdown man , Haekle's embryos, Java man, Nebraska man, etc.
@jeremiah sams Actually, I omitted many more, but yes, Lucy is worse because they are still using it, depicted with human hands and feet, even after finding more intact fossil "Lucys" with ape feet.
@@acutelogic2353
You live in a fantasy world and you are very selective when choosing to display evidence and sometimes you lie, to make it fit your religious cult. Schweitzer was quite public about how disappointed religious extremists misrepresented her work in science., but somehow you forgot to mention that.
There is no doubt that mistakes are made and in some case frauds, like with the Piltdown Man, but these are exposed. This is not done by religious extremists like you, or creationist money hungry organisations like ICR, Hovind or AiG, but by people like me. As for australopithecus afarensis, we now have +300 fossils and we know that they did not have "ape feet", but I guess that you find it ok to lie to promote your religious extremism.
Reality is that there are hundreds of Christian universities in the US alone, with an estimated 3.5 million students and billions in research funds and not one has managed to refute the scientific theory of evolution. There are dedicated research funds for projects dedicated to challenge the evolutionary theory and still nothing has been presented. In the past 25 years, large creationist organisations have had +100 million US$ at their disposal and employed their own scientists and not one relevant paper has been published, refuting evolution. So in essence, despite billions at their disposal, millions of academics and 50 years of research, nothing of scientific value has been presented. This is the reality that you don't want to see...
@@acutelogic2353 I thought the people that came up with the piltdown man were actually religious christian fanatics, I understand they did it to make evolution seem false. But it backfired on them and just proved that christianity is a lie. It goes to show what these people will do to prove their lies.
More and more powerful evidence of creation appears every year. Coincidence? I don’t think so. I think our Creator has a smile listening to this. Listening to people following His call to shine a light on His truth.☝️😇
👍 Amen to that! Defenders of the faith. Mighty men of valor!
@@soupey Not sure why my previous two replies to you vanished but here goes number three. Check out Ithasbeenwritten a dot com site for much evidence. Take care, B.
If your faith depends on the existence of giant lizards, god help us, and this is another mean spirited trick from the creator.
No it isn't. Its a bloke sat there talking shite. Y can't you see that.
@@andykeating791 Ha Ha you are just like the evolutionists, you want to throw out the evidence because it doesn't fit "the theory" (yes it's just a theory). Well guess what, the whole evolution idea is about to get tossed out the window. Mama always said "lies catch up wit ya". What kind of "science" throws away evidence if it doesn't support the theory?
I love watching these videos, I have noticed atheists, when they comment are very angry and demeaning, why?
Because they know their theory is junk. They’re out of reasons that man evolved. A logical person that even does a little research can see that it’s a lie based on lies. They don’t have anymore reasons to lead people to hell, by denying God. Evidence for Creation is popping up everywhere, and they’re panicking. So, they shut us away, and get the Tribulation kicked off.
@@kmaterne The harvest is coming, have to clear your minds of all negativity. Wish the non believers well and be on your way. Don't let them drag you down. We are all one soul split up on different paths of ascension to experience. Even the lowest of lowely people, the killingest of killers are on that same path. They are no different from the enlightened. It will just take them longer to evolve through reincarnation. That and calmness of mind, like the Hindu Yogies, must be realized to ascend durring the harvest. As of now, heaven and hell is on earth, will there be 144k of good pure people at the time of harvest to split this world into different realities? It's time Gaia evolves too!
@@Grim0954 um...ur nuts!
@@jimkluska253 and you're uninformed. Just call me Almond Joy. >.
@@Grim0954 LOL..THAT WAS WRONG OF ME, SORRY.....ITS JUST NOT BIBLICAL, SOMETIMES I CAN BEHAVE LIKE AN ASS
Life started out perfect and has been devolving ever since
Took the words right out of my head. 2 months ago
Entropy.
There is no such thing as devolution! Only adaptation! Evolution does not allow for anything to go back to a less adaptive condition. Humans are no longer creatures of naturla selection. We have develiped ways of allowing non adaptive individuals to survive and breed. This is why Dawkins stated that we must accept evolution but not make political and social policies by it'd concepts. Otherwise you end up with a regime like Hitler's!
Are we not men ? We are devo , d-e-v-o
@@tonyfrancesco3701! Dating yourself! LOL!
Guys, It is proof from God for us that we see its not about the quality of evidence or not.
Sinners gonna sin.
But the Savior is coming soon
@Jamie russell. 100 % right, but GOD says be prepared to give an answer! Now, I know that verse (in context) means to answer biblical themes but one reason Christians cant simple questions is because they refuse to research scientific data
IM NOT TALKING ABOUT THE CRAP THAT IS SPOUTED ON DISCOVERY CHANNEL OR NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC OR THAT IDIOT ON THE BBC,...BUT TRUTHFUL, CHRISTIAN SCIENTISTS!
Religious zealots dismissing overwhelming data contrary to their narrative while propping up anomalies that support their narrative. You dummies never catch on, do you. God of the gaps has been backing creationism up to the abyss for well over a century, and this will be no different. As if we won't find a scientific explanation for this soft tissue that coincides with the settled science. Very likely the outer layers of the fossil are created in a way that protects the soft tissue in the center.
You also have failed to realize we have potassium-40 and radioisotope dating that quashes your silly attempt to erase our Earths extensive history.
Nice try though....lol
@@kenhiett5266 Is that because you believe in the modern mythology that fish evolve into philosophers, that we're all related to bananas, and that meaningless evolved protoplasm somehow evolved to gain meaning and value?
The problem is that you are ignoring the evidence around you. When you see a building, you know there must have been a builder. In the same way, when we look at all of creation, we know there must have been a Creator. Logically, you only have two options:
1) the laws of nature created themselves, the entire universe created itself in contrast to the 1st and 2nd laws of thermodynamics which contradict each other at the beginning of the universe (which is why you inconsistently believe in supernatural phenomena like infinite alternate universes), the earth created itself randomly meeting 122 precise anthropic constants (1 in 10^138 chance), life randomly created itself in a global frozen dead environment (faint sun paradox) *with no observable evidence* , at some point all the right proteins and all the right cell components formed themselves inside of a cell enclosure, the mass quantities of information in DNA somehow created itself from non-information without an intelligent source (all information in existence has an intelligent source), and that meaningless evolved protoplasm like yourself somehow evolved to have meaning and value including the capacity for symbolic communication, to be able to evaluate things as beautiful, meaningful, or valuable... among many other difficulties. Nature created itself which is logically (Naturally) impossible because it requires Nature to be preexistent. You also believe these things *without observable evidence* in contrast to the laws of nature and in contrast to the scientific method, but then you erroneously call it "science" anyway.
2) God created the laws of nature (Jeremiah 33:25), God created the universe which is why we see such design and balance throughout (Genesis 1), God created the earth meeting 122 precise anthropic constants which is evidence of deliberate design (Isaiah 45:18), God created life out of non-life including the instructions in your DNA which scientifically/consistently came from an Intelligent Source (Psalm 139:13, Jeremiah 1:5, Genesis 1:27), the reason we have no evidence for an alleged early greenhouse gas atmosphere, life allegedly originating on a geothermal vent, or the early frozen atmosphere which should be there according to the faint sun paradox is because the earth isn't actually billions of years old (2 Thessalonians 2:10-12). The reason human beings and life itself are valuable, and the reason we can attribute meaning to anything, the reason we have the unique capacity for symbolic representation, including a felt need to champion an ideology, etc.... is because we are not meaningless evolved protoplasm, but meaningful and valuable human beings who were made in the image and likeness of God (Genesis 1:27).
The biblical worldview can make sense out of all those things that just don't make sense in your own internally inconsistent, existentially unviable worldview that keeps rewriting itself as we find more and more problems with it.
You will only be able to "sleep like a baby" until Judgment Day. On that day your fine is due for every single immoral act you've ever committed. Every lie you've told, every time you've stolen, every time you've fornicated, every time you've dishonored your parents, every time you've worshipped yourself instead of God, hated others, been gready/jealous, or used the name of the Holy God who created you as a curse word, you have been building up a fine for yourself. You cannot pay this fine because everything you have has been given to you, including your body, your eyes, your brain, your voice, food, water, shelter, and your very soul. You will get the justice that you deserve. If you sin just 10 times a day, then after 80 years you will have broken God's Ten Commandments over 290,000 times. God sees you a thoroughly demonstrated moral criminal even before you started deliberately spamming this anti-God ideology of yours.
"It is appointed for a man to die once, and then comes Judgment" (Hebrews 9:27). Will you be innocent or guilty? Heaven or Hell?
"But God showed His love for us by sending His Son to die for us while we were still sinners" (Romans 5:8). Will you have someone to pay your fine for you on Judgment Day?
@@michael9237 You're making an unjustified logical leap. We don't understand the true nature of reality. Quantum theory manifests this fact explicitly. You are attempting to understand things we have absolutely no evidence for by using our very narrow Earthy perspective. We don't have anywhere near a comprehensive understanding of time, so the beginning and ending to things we observe as entropy in our universe could be nothing more than an interface of sorts running on a much more complex underlying operating system, (or extra dimensions). Given the strange quality of the atomic scale and gravity, this is likely the case.
@@michael9237 It's even worse than that, you make the logical leap to a specific deity. And again, you have absolutely no evidence for such claims.
You're simply an organism programmed for survival. Genes don't get passed along very well without the mutations that give you this drive, so voila. Once humans became intelligent enough to understand our own mortality, of course we would apply this drive to an afterlife. There may be a prime mover, but there isn't a single joker on Earth that knows. Lots of insecurity and lots of wishful thinking.
Thank you for shedding some light on the dating of fossils and that science in no way is conclusive and supportive on all accounts on the popularized models out there.
As soon as I heard the first reports about finding "soft tissue" in Dinosaur fossils, I knew; "No way can this be 70 million years old!"
Are you a paleontologist, or just a religious extremist making up his on delusional world?
@@carlfrups948 lmfao, you yourself sound like a religious extremist.
@@carlfrups948 can the soft tissue survive that long under normal conditions? Please just answer the question. And please tell us how that can happen. (Just using your leanguage since you love science so much) there is no escape from being an extremist. Either you're a "religious extremist" or you are an anti-religious extremist.
@@gabrieljonathan3320
Soft tissue (just so that you understand, it is not soft when found in dinosaur bones), is not preserved for this long under normal circumstances, that is the reason why there are only a few examples this in the millions of dinosaur bones found. There is a perfect scientific explanation how it is preserved and we are trying to find out how it works. Google is your friend, so just search for it and you will find the scientific papers.
Carl Frups silly atheists still living in denial
It means that everything we've been told about dinosaurs being millions of years old is wrong.
Yup
The dating methods are contradictory and based on presuppositions that are not provable, not scientific. C-14 is found in dinosaur and other fossils thought to be 10s of millions of years old. C-14 should be gone after that much time. Other evidences of dinosaurs and modern animals co-existing in other videos, books, magazines and technical papers.
Not just wrong it has been deceitful lie...
You'll find that to be the case in most of the speculative sciences.
No! It only means that there is more to learn. Humility is required -- not the proud haughtiness of the Modern Pharisees.
This explains the state of those people: Romans 1:28-31 And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a debased mind, to do those things which are not fitting; being filled with all unrighteousness, sexual immorality, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness; full of envy, murder, strife, deceit, evil-mindedness; they are whisperers, backbiters, haters of God, violent, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents, undiscerning, untrustworthy, unloving, unforgiving, unmerciful; who, knowing the righteous judgment of God, that those who practice such things are deserving of death, not only do the same but also approve of those who practice them.
It is Romans chapter 1. They suppress the truth even when it is plain to them.
“For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who by their unrighteousness suppress the truth. For what can be known about God is plain to them, because God has shown it to them. For his invisible attributes, namely, his eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly perceived, ever since the creation of the world, in the things that have been made. So they are without excuse. For although they knew God, they did not honor him as God or give thanks to him, but they became futile in their thinking, and their foolish hearts were darkened. Claiming to be wise, they became fools,”
Romans 1:18-22
Reigning with Christ! Tim Wood Best response so far on this subject, always best to use scripture to explain the truth, well done Sir.👏👏👏👏👏
Excellent! Which Bible translation are you using?
Tim Wood, scripture is so full of Truth, yet the Modern Pharisees see so little of it. They only see the letter and not the spirit.
@talllala, I believe this is NKJV
@@martisendrell9305 Thanks!
Can you imagine a hold field of scientists who’s life’s work is based on the belief that dinosaurs are millions of years old and how hard they’d fight to save their work even if it’s all.. wrong?
This is an inaccurate representation of how scientists and science works.
A scientist who could show that any major paradigm is wrong represents a serious promotion of that group/ company, university to the fore.
Science relies a lot on disproof.
That is why we know the millions of years thing is correct. It has been attacked and challenged many, many times. It has survived because the evidence is robust.
The nonsense presented here does not survive scrutiny.
@@ozowen Science deniers such as yourself need to consider that you have been wrong all your life and leave the science to scientists that will go where the evidence takes them...not where dogmatic presuppositions stifle further scientific inquiry.
@@alantasman8273 In what way am I a "science denier"?
Is it because I consider "creation science" to be an oxymoron?
If you look into what Schweitzer herself has to say on this issue you will find she has no truck with creationism nor with the nonsense they have spouted in regards to her work
Better yet, read her actual research.
Her research the scientific research she did on this subject does not lead to the idiotic claims made by creationists.
@@ozowen what claims of creationists look idiotic to you?
@@dimitrismanolopoulos5499
Most of their claims are idiotic.
But how about the assertion that the find of soft tissue in the fossil means a young Earth.
Logically that cannot follow as it is wholly insufficient to challenge the evidence for an ancient Earth.
Logically you could argue a remnant population survived and persisted or that there is a means of preservation of tissue.
This totally backs up the validity of the human footprints along side dinosaur prints side by side fossilized in rocks .
AS A CREATIONIST AND A CHRISTIAN I APPLAUD YOUR WORK AND SIMPLE STRAIGHT FORWARD LOGIC! GOD BLESS YOU! FAITH IN ALMIGHTY GOD IS BRINGING HIS WONDERFUL CREATION STORY AND THE FLOOD TRUTH TO THE MAINSTREAM! GOD BLESS YOUR AWESOME WORK!!!
Hopefully so more people will believe the word of God and his Son Jesus Christ.
@@Saribex Unfortunately, as we can all see creationists lying online, that isn't happening. Check the Pew research numbers.
Let God be TRUE and every man a liar. As it is written.
Brandon Neifert how so?
Dinosaurs are fake, this is literally a script. The fact that they can pull out any rock and claim “this contains cells inside even though it looks like a rock”, and you sheep just eat it up is disgusting. The Gentiles OWN YOU WITH THEIR VAIN PHILOSOPHIES! They captivate your imagination and you become a slave in your own mind! THE REAL WORKS OF ART ARE ALL AROUND YOU, EVERY FIELD, EVERY MOUNTAIN, EVERY VALLEY AND SHORE, ALL MADE AS A FORM OF ART BY, YAHUAH, THE ALMIGHTY SOVEREIGN, IN LITERALLY SIX DAYS!
This is a form of predictive programming.
They can show you whatever you want to see, as long as you WANT to believe they are telling you the truth, THEY ARE YOUR GODS!
IT IS WRITTEN THAT IT SHALL BE IN THE DAYS OF NOAH! NEWS FLASH, THEY WERE CREATING ABOMINATIONS AND MIXING ANIMALS AND HUMANS IN THOSE DAYS! ANGELS MIXED WITH HUMANS AND ANIMALS MIXED WITH ANIMALS! ALL SORTS OF DISGUSTING CREATURES WERE MADE! THE ANGELS THAT REBELLED DESTROYED THE BEAUTIFUL CREATION WITH PURE INFORMATION AND KNOWLEDGE OF DIFFERENT THINGS WE ARE NOT SUPPOSED TO KNOW AS MORTALS.
They are going to recreate their abominations and tell you it’s reviving dinosaurs. THEY ARE ABOMINATIONS! WAKE UP PEOPLE, YOU’RE BEING DECEIVED ON A LEVEL AND MAGNITUDE YOU WOULD NOT BELIEVE WAS EVER POSSIBLE, ITS LITERALLY, LITERALLY!!!! A SHOW!!!!
YOUR BLOOD TELLS A STORY OF WHERE YOUR FAMILY COMES FROM ALL THE WAY BACK TO ADAM AND EVE, YOUR WORLD GOVERNMENTS ARE AWARE OF THIS, THEY STOLE YOUR IDENTY AND DESTROYED HISTORY. YOU DONT KNOW YOUR ORIGIN, YOU DONT KNOW YOU WERE CREATED.
GOD IS VERY REAL, AND YOU HAVE UNDERESTIMATED THE DEVIL AND HIS CHILDREN, YOU KILL YOURSELVES BECAUSE OF PORN AND FOOD ADDITIONS, INSATIABLE LUSTS FOR ENTERTAINMENT AND DEMORALIZING MUSIC AND FREQUENCIES.
THE MOST HIGH GOD SENT HIS SON TO DIE FOR YOU, WAKE UP AND SEEK TRUTH, YOU CANT FIND OR SEE TRUTH IF YOU DO NOT HUMBLE YOURSELF AND SEEK RIGHTEOUSNESS THRU REPENTANCE AND FAITH, PRAYER AND FASTING!
Kevin Cobb To assume my demeanor thru text is embarrassing.
Lukewarm is for the Gentiles.
Your blood be upon your own head.
Amen sister!
@@7eamGhast actually, there are many reports showing these animals did roam freely during the time of Noah...as creations of God. Although some species could,have died out earlier. To say these are abominations, discredits,the bible and the creation account as even cave dwelling men showed they were around during that time.
The fact is the flood waters formed giant tsunamis and pushed acrossed the western continents leaving animals in waves. This supports the bibles account.
It also supports that God selected those from the kinds created that should survive...coming in twos to the ark. Again, your words bring discredit to the word of God.
The fact that soft tissue has been found in fossils presents a great learning opportunity for all.
well it would be, if Mark armitage would share his specimens.
@ ø well Mark has tissue samples which would give us further insight into this animals. Might even be possible to isolate DNA from those specimens.
@@johnbrinsmead3316 "Might even be possible to isolate DNA from those specimens."
Good luck with that, DNA deteriorates very easily.
@@Dr-Curious you said in response to what @John Brinsmead said
@@acutelogic2353 Did you say "partially"?
So, the DNA had probably mostly deteriorated, right?
Nobody stated time as a factor. DNA deteriorates in environments that break it down and they do that fast.
If the immediate environment allows the DNA to stay partially intact, we can't make any statements about how long that condition can last.
The fact so far only one dino DNA has been partially sequenced means 99.999% of DNA has deteriorated.
Spin is fun, right? But it tells us who has real evidence.
This is so dang interesting. I have herd many theories about life and the universe. This calls out so many questions about so much of what I have been told. Thanks for the time and research! I can’t wait to hear more some day!
We all need an open mind.
Read the actual research then. Most of it is easily accessible.
It does not point to this.
Don't forget to read the bible, it is now the best theory we have.
@@owenduck That is completely incorrect lol the bible isn't even a theory in the first place. It covers far too wide a range of topics, many of which aren't related to science in the first place and are more philosophical in nature. And many of the claims it makes are refuted by science. Miracles, for example, are by definition supernatural and cannot be scientifically understood, proven, or replicated.
@@samstarlight160 how are miracles refuted by science?
I find it so awesome that God wants to show us how He created all. the advances in technology, science, etc. point us to Creation and take us away from Evolution. God wants to reveal his making, and science is taking us there. It is so exciting.
Which God?
@@vudusid8717 The Creator.
@@besanzaz Ah, Reorx! He's a good guy, but likes the booze and gambling. Don't let him talk you into a game.
@@globalcoupledances Science is pointing in a different direction than evolution. The missing link is nowhere to be found.
@@globalcoupledances Whenever you get that way remember that evolution is a Theory . It has not been proven yet. So cheer up. 😊
I've never really argued with science. I've always believed in God. My faith is all I need. One of the biggest pieces of proof I've seen of God's existence is how hard people try to make us not believe. If they really didn't believe they would just laugh us off.
@@logicalatheist1065 He never said that it was proof.
Of course you can believe in God and accept scientific research. Creationists founded science, after all. And so to claim that they deny it is absurd. It doesn't follow that they have to agree with every claim made by scientists, however.
Good to Grow , I Believe In God I also believe in Science but only to the point that man is still scratching its head as to what science really is. Humanity still thinks that they are advanced. Thing is, new discoveries are happening literally every day some discoveries proving what we “know to be fact” is wrong. Stand humanity next to God and your basically seeing perfection standing next to a bug walking around in a circle. Yes Humanity has made great strides but in a simply human standard. I believe Science, really pure science (something that humanity still has yet to achieve) is the work of God. God is the creator.
@@amechealle5918 I can get on board with that. When the Bible says the sea was parted and scientists say the wind would have to blow at this certain direction for this long at this speed I just laugh and think so science figured out how God did it good for them.
We do laugh you off 😹
@@Joshua-dc1bs those tears are giving you away lol
I personally believe that scientists who believe in evolution, must also believe that nature, naturally can make the eiffel tower. There is just so much intricity that you can say is down to chance before you show that your foundation of science is based on memorisation rather than understanding natural phenomena.
Human biology is crazy complex.
My moms great aunt got fired from her professor job back in the 70's because she published some stuff that she found in Mexico , I think , I mean for years she couldn't even get a manuscript looked at for her book so she went to work at a private research company and got published many times ...
well they will publish any nut jobs
@@scienceiswisdom8002 Exactly! Like stuff about 70 /80 million old intact tissue, right?
@@warpnin3 lol funny that people actually started questioning them and they all of the sudden discovered 90 million year old tissue like a miracle from god
Y'all can't even properly compose a sentence, you're clearly not intelligent enough to have such debates.
@@diandirk3423 "funny that people actually started questioning"
Are you sure that's how it happened? Are you being honest?
I mean, discovery is what scientists are paid to do, and creationists haven't discovered anything at all.
That would rule out millions of years old. Only a few thousands years just as the Bible says.
Why would that rule out millions of years?
@@carlfrups948 because tissue would not be there...would have disintegrated ....decayed away after miiiilions of years...obviously?...it is SOFT TISSUE.....and the bone Sweitzer found smelt like rotten corpse..it ain't that old🙂
The Earth cant be thousands of years old it was created last Thursday.
@Kanikapila Ho'ohanai We say in the beginning God Created everything, you say in the beginning nothing created everything! LoL Who's believing in fairytales?😂
@Kanikapila Ho'ohanai The logic of nothing creating everything & non life miraculously turning into life is what i call nonsense mister.
Thank you for your truthful presentation. It is fascinating. I loved it.
Might as well face it we've been lied to.
The bible is true. You've just been listening to the wrong source! Blessings
@@JesusisHere777 I know the Bible is true, I believe God the father, son and holy spirit. We've been lied to regarding evolution, and the big woopsie bang and billions of years.
yes by idiots in this video stop being gullible
@@scienceiswisdom8002 scientific "evidence" has to be tested to prove true. Evolution is untestable. We all use science. There are many sciences, but true wisdom comes from God.
@@garbicthan7457
scientific "evidence" has to be tested to prove true. -- This part is mostly right. Science relies on testable evidence to validate a theory. Even then the scientific community tries to find flaws in the claim, process and results. If they do, the claim is put aside or reconsidered and adjusted. If they can't disprove it then the claim begins to enter the pool of accepted knowledge, tentatively at first but over time, as more validation arrives, it becomes the current theory. Now, compare this to AiG's idea of a science paper, the kind they have in their own archive. To submit a paper the 'scientist' must start from the position of 'Young Earth Creation is correct' and then the paper must support that position. This is the exact opposite of science. The submission criteria are below....
-----------------------------------------
The following criteria will be used in judging papers:
1. Is the paper’s topic important to the development of the Creation and Flood model?
2. Does the paper’s topic provide an original contribution to the Creation and Flood model?
3. Is this paper formulated within a young-earth, young-universe framework?
4. If the paper discusses claimed evidence for an old earth and/or universe, does this paper
offer a very constructively positive criticism and provide a possible young-earth, young-universe alternative?
5. If the paper is polemical in nature, does it deal with a topic rarely discussed within the
origins debate?
6. Does this paper provide evidence of faithfulness to the grammatical-historical/normative
interpretation of Scripture? If necessary, refer to the following: R. E. Walsh, 1986. “Biblical
Hermeneutics and Creation.” In Proceedings First International Conference on Creationism,
vol. 1, 121-127. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania: Creation Science Fellowship.
Remark:
The editor-in-chief will not be afraid to reject a paper if it does not properly satisfy the above
criteria or if it conflicts with the best interests of AiG as judged by its biblical stand and goals
outlined in its statement of faith.
-----------------------------------------
Does that look at all like honest scientific pursuit?
Evolution is untestable. -- Not true. We watch evolution in progress all the time, it's a bit slow, but it's observed in nature and in the lab. The long term stuff we can demonstrate through DNA and fossils found for many animals including humans. Shorter lived things can be observed over the course of a few years to change if their conditions change enough. So while it's not easily testable on demand we can certainly test the theory and say 'if man came from apes I should be able to find examples in the fossil record of the stages of development'... and we have. And this same idea should apply to other creatures, such as dinosaurs and chickens. And it does. We might not know what a creature turned into initially, but we can either start with the current version, or any of the past versions, and work our way up and down the development line. This is all thoroughly studied and reliable.
We all use science. -- This is true. Either we use the products science made for us or we use science in our daily lives, like cooking.
There are many sciences, -- There is one scientific process, but many scientific disciplines, like physics, chemistry, biology, etc.
but wisdom comes from God. -- prove it. Step 1, prove gods exist. Step 2, prove the one you refer to as "God" actually exists. That's what all this comes down to, that demand for evidence before believing a claim. It's only right for us to want evidence for a life altering claim like that. But, no one ever provides evidence. And no, the bible is not evidence of this. The bible is a collection of writings, some of which are just reboots of even older stories, cobbled together to give religious leaders something to validate their authority against. That's all it is. And it was done so poorly it makes no sense. On the one hand, god is a jealous god. On the other hand jealousy is a sin. So... god... is a sinner. Pretty sure that wasn't thought through very well.
Point is, if you want untestable, god is an example of untestable. It's even written into the rules that we aren't allowed to test him. When you are starting a cult it's good to establish rules like this. From page 1 that book is utter nonsense. I have read it. I was raised with it. I went to the schools, I did the sunday school thing. I went to church. It never made sense. Apologists exist to find ways to forcibly reword reality to kinda fit scripture. That is their core competency. I am pretty sure 'gods word' would not need interpreters to be understood, if such a being existed and wanted us to know about him.
Peace.
Another UA-cam vid that debunks the very damaging and missleading evolution theory 👌🏼😉
@@ozowen5961have you been listening?
@@ozowen5961 soyou are not listening..
@@ozowen5961 bruh, I literally saw u on another comment and they literally told you themselves that there is NO scientific evidence of evolution, stop bashing on facts because u refuse to believe in God
@@ozowen5961 bro, I respect you ok but in the Bible it says that he created man through the dirt in Genesis 2:7, and he also says in the Begining he created Adam, not Created a organism that transformed to man, but if by all means, if you do not want to agree, then we can agree to disagree
You don’t see it but this supports evolution and old earth. .
“What kind of king makes Himself nothing for His people?
The Mighty one.
What kind of king lets His people humiliate and beat Him until He is unrecognizable and is still able to hold His head high?
The Merciful one.
What kind of king hangs Himself on a cross for his people?
The Righteous one.
And because He has done this for us I will make my life a living sacrifice unto Him.”
His name is above all others His name is JESUS!
those people who rejected her findings were hoping it would not have been found because it went against what they want to believe
If you didn't already know about the theory of Evolution, you would not conclude that the tissue was millions of years old. Unless you were a nutcase.
are you serious? tell me what you think soft tissue means and how it relates to evolution.
In my heart, I know that it's fact that the Bible is true.
In my heart, I know the Qur'an is true. And the Book of Mormon.
@@charlesbrowniii8398 And Harry Potter.
Hiram instead of using your heart use your brain.
My wife and I can't wait to go see the ark and the museum so much awesome info and truth.
Bert B 🤦♂️ theyre shills. It’s a psyop. There’s nothing truthful about dinosaurs or outerspace and thsts all they focus on
The Bible indeed has a great deal of truth to offer, but Modern Pharisees cannot help you there.
I've been, be prepared to be disappointed, it's a farce
lol no truth at all there. go back to school
Tell me dweebs, what if the "circle of the Earth" in Isaiah 40:22 refers to the ecliptic of the Earth's orbit around the Sun?
Exactly right. The scriptures always had the correct history of this planet.
Yet the Modern Pharisees do not know the spirit of scripture. Did you know that the true Flood date matches the date in science for the extinction of a very specific species which competed with Homo sapiens? They were the "daughters of men" which died out 27,970 BC. The time of Adam was far, far earlier. (Ref: *_The Bible's Hidden Wisdom)_*
For a bonus look into sonoluminescence (light from sound)
@@user-hr8pz6lh5w And look up my books, *_Proof of God_* and *_The Bible's Hidden Wisdom._* There's a lot more going on than secular scientists and other biblical literalists will ever know.
That's what flattards say.
Why do they find so many types of dinosaur bones in close proximity? sometimes even piled up. The answer is simple, a flood. They were moving to dry ground
Very true. Many sites around the world you can visit explain that in writing.
That’s a problem for evolutionists. We have a fossil graveyard in the middle of our country. On high ground. Adult dinosaurs, that clearly drowned. Or, were buried in mud. They’ll find a reason to deny evidence. You can lead a jackass to water....
Joe is completely right.
bahahaha you cant actually believe that. pilled up? dry ground? you do realize that not only is there no evidence for a world wide flood but its actually impossible.
@@bryguy8203 not at all
Evidence from God to repent of your sins, believe in Jesus, His only Son and live forever.
@@arc001 The Holy Bible is book telling of God's existence and His desire for the human race. It tells of times when God spoke to people, in many different forms, and rewarded those that obeyed and punished those that did not. It is also historical like the creation of everything, Noah's Ark, Joseph's grain silos in Egypt, Sodom and Gomorrah, Red Sea Crossing, Mount Sinai, Ark of the Covenant, Samson, King David, etc. up to the Crucifixion of Jesus Christ and His Resurrection. Since the places, people and events of the Bible are factual and God is entwined within all of it, it is evidence of His existence. Do you think the 40+ authors and 2,000 years of writings with God being the main focus was a mythical god to lure you into righteous moral character? I think not. God is searching for people to live with Him in His perfect Kingdom, and wishes for us all to be there.
All evidence is from God. Misinterpreting evidence is easy for the arrogant -- the ones Jesus called "First" who shall become Last.
@@arc001
If you haven't worked out yourself....well....
The Bible is poorly plagiarized from a dozen older religions. All the Jesus stories you know were plagiarized from stories about gods that are thousands of years older. You all are brainwashed
@@moodist1er The only story that could be considered plagiarized is the one about the Great Flood. But it is not for it is the original. For no one was alive except the eight from the Ark. Christ's virgin birth and date that we celebrate His birth does have relationship with other stories, that's all, none of it is fact. Here is a fact, the Messiah coming and who He would be and things that He would do was told of in the Old Testament years before He was born. There are 325 different example of this. Jesus meet all of them. It is said that to meet 10 of them, the odds would out number the stars in the universe.
Physicist Max Planck said: “A new scientific truth does not triumph by convincing its opponents and making them see the light, but rather because its opponents eventually die, and a new generation grows up that is familiar with it.”
Best comment here!!!
Dinosaurs were in the time of Adam, the first 6 chapters of Genesis. They called them dragons. The word Dinosaur wasn’t invented until 1841.
Jeez Louise, read a book past the 3rd grade. Seriously, no one with an IQ > 1 thinks 1) Adam and Eve were "real" or 2) they played tag with T-Rex. The idea is just so....bizarre.
@@ozowen5961 I agree. Anyone who thinks "soft" tissue points to an early age is spreading drivel.
You are correct, there is an excellent video about it. It was pivotal to change my mind towards creationism several years ago :
ua-cam.com/video/czDpqyGutTs/v-deo.html
@@smb123211 that is your unbelief at work. The so called wise and scholarly of today lack faith and knowledge, just like the Pharisee and Sadducee did in their day.
@@sandyo1063 Belief? I provided an explanation for soft tissue and what it meant No non-fundamentalist seminary teaches that Adam & Eve were "real'. Scientist know humans and dinosaurs did not coexist for one obvious reason - no piece of geological strata has shown a contradiction. For example, no dinosaurs after 60 million BC or fish in strata 500 million years or flowering plants in strats before 130 million years. If we found a t-rex eating a cow that would be different.
It's sad / funny/ One man claimed, "One fossil was 52 myo but the soft tissue only 50,000 years old.!" I said, "But you just said the Earth was only 6,000 years old." LOL He later replied that dating "didn't work" (no explanation) so I asked why he accepted the dates he cited. A few months later I saw he was still making the same claim. (He never read the article that explained the discrepancy.
The more we see the more we know HE is alive...
god is dead
they*
Amen!
@@diandirk3423 Jesus said that those that deny me before men, I will deny before my Heavenly Father.
@@alantasman8273 can't wait
I love these episodes. Every new one is my go to.
Knowledge shall increase! 🤔🧐🙏🌏🌍👍🥰
Only with humility the Modern Pharisees will never have.
Indeed.
Yes
Yes amen this is the true knowledge we need
So first of all. Many people in the comment section here are very smug about the topic, as if it proves their young earth creationist world view. We get to that later.
The actual topic is already decently old, over a decade. We simply assumed soft tissues would fossilize, since the rest of the bone does too. That assumption was wrong. It wasnt all that shocking, it simply taught us more about how fossilization works. Namely, the high iron concentration within the bone made for a good preservation environment. You can perform a similar experiment yourself. Take a lump of meat and put it on the table. Put one in an iron-rich fluid without oxygen in it, next to it. Let them sit for a month. One will have decayed, while the other will look pretty much fresh. In nature, the rare cases of bones which have soft issue inside of them were quickly buried by several meters of sandstone, and the soft tissue is only found in intact bones. Due to the rapid burial, the soft tissue had no time to decompose at the surface. Due to the depth, it was protected from water and oxydation. And the intact bone on top of it all means it was more or less sealed inside a container. Under those conditions you can find "soft tissue" in dinosaur bones.
The "soft tissue" found in the bones is also not meat. I feel like people expect the scientists to have cut open a bone and found some intact muscles, or a steak or something. That's ridiculous. Read the actual paper of Mary Schweitzer. She found, quote "transparant soft tissue vesselt" [..] "which floated freely in the demineralizing solution". The last part of that description is also important. Like everything else, the "soft tissue" was mineralized, it only became "flexible" or "soft" after the scientists actively and carefully demineralized it.
There is only one aspect of this entire topic that was problematic for any part of the scientific community, and that is the creationists and media who never actually read Marys paper, claiming she said things she never did, and making ridiculous statements under her name, which actually negatively impacted her carrier. How about any of you actually read her paper? I know.. that's a lot harder than copy pasting claims made by someone else who didnt read it, or the media who got it wrong, as usual.
So much for the facts. Now let's get to your young earth world view. Sadly, that's still a bunch of nonsense. Let's take a look at DNA. We have been able to sequence DNA from organisms that died tens of thousands of years ago without issues. Even a hundred thousand years. If i remember correctly the oldest full intact DNA we sequences was a couple hundred thousand years old, and the oldest DNA we found at all was 2.5 million years old. In a young earth world view, how comes we have never found, say, T-Rex DNA, while consistantly finding it for any and all modern species? If earth was young, we would expect to find DNA for pretty much every organism that ever existed, since they all existed together, and very recently at that. Even if you argue all the dating methods are wrong, how do you explain that we can find DNA consistantly for what the scientific world view considers to be modern species, while we fail to find any for any species the scientific world view considers to be way too old? That's a funny coincidence now, is it?
You wrote a lot, but still fool
@@KOIFishcat No, you are not willing to deal with scientific facts.
@@Nils-gi5bv you mean pseudoscientific factoids, fool
@@Nils-gi5bv you seem to be new to the internet, or at least to UA-cam
As a biochemist, I can only agree with you, but you are trying in vain on this channel. Nobody here wants to hear the scientific point of view. No one will take the trouble to read some of Mary Schweitzer's publications, for example, although they are easy to find. They might be tempted to question their own fixed beliefs.
Thank you for these informative videos. God bless you people for speaking the( gospel truth )..🙏
Every past culture has stories of dragons or large serpents or other things. I wonder why?
Revtune
Reptiles are in lots of places my guy.
@@arcticpangolin3090 These "dragons' or large serpents were very common, apparently, so people incorporated them in their stories and history.
Bugs are also everywhere but no culture has giant bugs
@@keatflores9661 Peruvian Ica burial stones and the Acámbaro figurines of Mexico along with other literature and artistic renderings of dragons seem to indicate that man at one point lived contemporaneously with dinosaurs. Just do a search of Cambodian Stegosaurus on a door post that dates to around 1200AD and you will see that we are not being told the truth about dinosaurs because they tie better with a young earth and what the Bible says.
"What Does Soft Tissue in Dinosaur Bones Mean for Evolution?"
Darwin was in error concerning macro evolution based upon technological knowledge and instrumentation of his time. Advancements in these areas since then have proven his error.
Read Darwins black box. It really shows how the whole evolution argument was built on a flawed premise
@@jimkluska253
Please elaborate, or look like a fool.
@@jimkluska253 So you are a fool...
@@carlfrups948 Darwin's Galapagos finches are still only finches. Thier beaks adapted to their lifestyle and the food available. You can't breed a Great Dane from a Chihuahua. Elephants only give birth to elephants. The DNA limitation to change is set by the amount of information originally present from which to select.
@@carlfrups948
You believe in this, yet you call another a fool:
On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life
"Preservation of favoured races... "
This part of the book title is never brought up. I wonder why? Maybe because it has been used as support for genocide by wicked regimes since the late 19th century?
Fantastic! I have been subbed to Mark's channel for a while and he has went over this stuff a lot.
EVIL- LUTION = DEATH......don’t get deceived......God Bless one and all.......👍🇬🇧🤓
The denial that God exists is much more important to the deceits of Darwin than the reality that He did exist as the Biblical History proves to be harder to disprove through recognition that He is the Author of Science.
The Bible consistently proves its authenticity, as God is not an author of confusion.
He is everything
@@eternallife4830 lol you mean with everything wrong in it?
An evolutionist will never consider this video to be true and it has nothing to do with science. To accept it would require them to give up their religion: atheism.
@@billstaehlin4546 And their being accountable to a higher Power.
i know exactly what it means. it means the dinosaurs may MARROWLY avoid extinction. lol
Nice one
I guess Atheism doesn’t have much MEAT to their argument.
It means the Bible is right.
Heaven and Hell are real places. Get Ready!
Not only right, but more importantly TRUE!
Amen my friend. There is no lie, or darkness in The True and Living God Creator of heaven and earth (not even of speck), nor in His Word.
Hahahahahaha
@@urbugnmetoday3183 The bible refers to Dinosaurs as lizards and laviothin.They were here during the early times of man. Maybe even after the flood.
Outstanding work!
Most people are not aware of the many ancient petroglyphs depicting men hunting or fighting dinosaurs.
And where did the tradition of 'dragons' originate?
If God could create the bombardier beetle, which ejects a mix of chemicals out its butt that ignites in order to defend itself, why could there not have been, in the ancient past, huge reptiles that could eject a mix of volatile chemicals out of their mouth to defend themselves? Why not??
He was doing good until he claimed extraordinary preservation therefore 100% excludes great antiquity because reasons (bias). The proteins are altered/replaced at an atomic level at just enough a level that they are preserved just like how salt preserves meat and how formaldehyde, mercury and oils/resins preserves soft tissues. We now know soft tissue can in fact be preserved essentially forever under ideal conditions. Let's apply logic here... If the samples were only 4000 years old you would see not one but hundreds of associated biological molecules also preserved just as well and you don't. They would run hand in hand. Collagen is a special case it appears. When we get to the level we can identify the remnants of DNA base pairs and therefore get the letters we will be able to essentially run AncestryDNA type comparisons between extant and extinct organisms. We already know from Phylogeny and some old DNA how much is inherited from past forms and it's a lot (actually almost all of it). The relevance of preserved collagen to Young Earth Creationism is approximately zero.
Great video, thanks for sharing!
What actually happened according to doctor Schweitzer’s experimentation is the fossilized T. rex femur was broken in the shipping process, the interior parts of the femur were tested and the parts tested were put in a mild acid to better test them and examine them, soft tissue was found, there were 3 options either the bones were young (not the case because the femur was found underneath the KT layer, there was a problem called biofilm (which was disproved through testing) or the soft tissue was persevered, which was the case. They soft microscopic tissue was preserved in a process were after the animal died hemoglobin in the body released iron Krystal’s which crosslinked with the proteins in the femur, and thus preserved the tissue through fossilization. DR. Mary Schweitzers discovery and experimentation is a perfect example of the scientific method being used to find out the mysteries of the natural world.
I read where they cut a T-Rex skull in half and then that school they found soft tissue. There was no femur.
God bless all watching....PRAISE JESUS!!
To quote one of my favourite Star Trek characters: "Fascinating"
Another fantastic presentation. Thank you for producing this very fairly, without evolutionary presupositions. More proof that rejects the millions & billions of years theory... the question is are we willing to accept the findings, I for one is. Well done again.
wow you are just so gullible
@@scienceiswisdom8002 That goes both ways. You have to have just as much zealous faith in science to ignore the fact that it doesn't explain where the first living cell come from that evolved into everything, and has continually added years to the age of the earth to make their theory work with the exact same evidence that creationist use to prove the flood in the Bible.
@@bearthalamas9241 well abiogenises has nothing to do with the theory of evolution. how and what do you believe added year to the age of the earth and to make what work exactly? do not compare religious dogma with actual science, one changes with new information, one is perpetuation of stories told around a fire.
@@scienceiswisdom8002 You have to have life to evolve from. So they kinda do go together. No brainer. And all the evidence that supports evolution, is the exact same evidence that supports a creator too. Just different interpretations of the same evidence, by different ppl with different views. And evolution had to start somewhere. And guess what, they can't pinpoint where life came from, or how it got here, in the first place to start evolving, and they keep changing the age of the earth, it was millions of years old when I was in high school, now it's billions of years old lol. I don't know why you would even ask that. Evolution has already evolved billions of years in evolution years to 35 calender years.
@@scienceiswisdom8002 in my life time, or over the last hundred years, look up how many different animals have gone extinct. I don't see evolution, I see everything devolving, and animals going extinct at alarming rates. We're losing land too, look at all the ancient cities under water, I don't see the earth magically getting better with my own eyes. I see more of a de-evolution going on. The continents spreading apart use to be one continent. It's not getting better, it's wearing out and sinking, and spreading out. Science is just different men's interpretation. Not all scientist even agree on it. Theirs a whole community of prominent scientist that do not endorse the mainstream theory, and interpret the evidence entirely different. Scientist clowns like Neil degrassi Tyson want to defend evolution by saying catchphrases like "your not entitled to your own facts", when science has changed so many things over the last 50 years from the age of the earth, from all their missing links, missing fossil record for the last 1000 years, all the half dog half fish pictures in the old textbooks, and now your head clown scientist wants to defend evolution by saying only scientist can interpret facts lmao.
really amazing work this channel do,i was waiting for something like that to speak to people in sounding mind with good logic & science, God bless you.
Great information, Thank you.
We're glad this was helpful!
Brilliantly explained complex subject!
thanks for putting this kind of information out there!
This video blew my mind.
This comports with the depiction of a stegosaurus on the temple at Angkor Wat. Seems likely at very least that some species were more recently existent than science is willing to admit.
there are vast areas of jungle still covering Cambodia nowadays but disappearing fast due to deforestation. i am hoping that the truth will literally come out of it!
Peruvian Ica burial stones and the Acámbaro figurines of Mexico along with other literature and artistic renderings of dragons seem to indicate that man at one point lived contemporaneously with dinosaurs. Just do a search of Cambodian Stegosaurus on a door post that dates to around 1200AD and you will see that we are not being told the truth about dinosaurs because they tie better with a young earth and what the Bible says.
"Soft tissue" is a very misleading term in this context, which can lead to misunderstandings among laypeople.
The "tissue" found by Mary Schweitzer was fossilized, enclosed in a large undamaged bone that was also fossilized and which was itself baked into stone. It is hard to imagine a better long-term preservation. In addition, in the early phase after death, the iron from the decayed haemoglobin protected for decomposition.
The material was freed from the mineral by a complex chemical treatment and was then reminiscent of soft tissue, as should also be found at this location. Of course, it is not functional, it is dead.
You heard it from his mouth, he believes bone is a rock
It's hard to believe that soft tissues would have lasted 5,000 years but it millions of times more difficult to believe that the soft tissues have lasted 65 million years!!!
Both would be impossible without a preservation method which wasn't found at the time the tissues were discovered, but we found cross-linking can explain the fossil surviving for millions of years.
Discoveries were made, believe it
‘You either have to reject the entire dating process, or you have to reject the soft tissue’
Here is where he really gives himself away. He presents a false dichotomy. Hey Dr. Anderson, what about that third option? The one which you’re blithely hand waving away, which doesn’t require rejecting the dating process, or the soft tissue? Namely some form of preservation heretofore not fully understood. Hey, a new, and exciting field of study! Let’s see what we find.
Talk about rejecting a path of inquiry based on one’s personal bias. The preservation hypothesis is only just getting started and he’s slamming - or trying to slam - the door shut.
Uhm, Dr. Anderson, I’ve misplaced my keys. I’m pretty sure they’re somewhere on my property, so I’ll search for them here. His reply is no don’t bother looking there. They’re most likely at the summit of Olympus Mons.
In other words, No, he asserts, the hundreds of years of multi-disciplinary science on the age of the Earth are all wrong. The age of the Earth is either order of magnitude 10 to the third power, or the tissue samples are wrong. And we know that the tissue is good; therefore…
The real question is how do you build a calibration to test for 10 to 100 million when we don't have absolute proof something that old. I have done calibrations for 30+ years and you have to have knowns. It is imposable to calibrate on guess work. So they say educated guess and then say it is a fact. These are assumptions and hotly debated at that. Scientist are becoming politicians instead of using pure scientist.
I wonder what might happen on Earth if you suddenly cranked 4 billion years of decay rates up to a level to make them match a 6,000 year Earth? I'm sure the math is easy enough to finger out with a pencil so show your work. Tell us what happens. Then explain how to square that with reality.
If I were to deny Christ, I would be lying.
It wouldn't matter because he's fictional and poorly plagiarized from a dozen older religions.
@@moodist1er Are you sure about that? Could it be that these religions are plagiarized from Him? were you aware that Jesus Christ is not a religion, that religions are created from Him? Were you aware that many have bone over and debunked those accusations of plagiarizations and any attempt to use that position is old news and futile? Religions are made by men, designed to tell men what to think and do.
You do know about Pascal's wager?
@@DrHarryT Judaism is plagerized from the ancient Sumerian religions and their ancient texts, Sumerians took it from someone else before them and so on. Christianity and Islam are branches of judaism, which means if one is a lie, then they all are lies made up by man. Research it, it is quite sad that you all think you are gods chosen people, when you are all fighting and killing each other over an imaginary being and an unfounded lie. And get this, not one of you even know it, because you have invested too much of your lives into this lie called religion. The story of Noah, the story of good and evil and heaven and hell. Quite a lot more stories from other religions have been stolen by christianity. Ttake the book of the dead for example, it was where the ten commandments come from, but they have quite a few more than ten commandments in their book though. But don't take my word for it, do the research and look it up. I've got nothing to lose by lying, but you have everything to gain by knowing. If you follow a lie, well that means you are living a lie. I think you religious people just too proud to accept that fact.
moodist 1er no not really, there is no connection to them, plus there is no biblical evidence of him, even his death
@@moodist1er Jesus Christ is the reason you have to say its 2020.
Lol he is real and he is ths JUDGE
Very fascinating for me when I heard about this since I went to California State University, Northridge. This man was ridiculed and fired I think. I was also duped into believing in evolution. I became born again 10 years ago and God has open my mind up to the truth.
"This man" is a microbiologist and creationist and not involved nor trained in any field related to fossils.
Fossilized (chemically altered) tissue to be clear. That's why it still exists in the bones. It's what the structures are composed of. Hypothetically if you take a piece of wood and somehow replace certain parts of the organic molecules of the cellulose with something other than hard silica that can preserve you will have fossil wood that retains it's woodiness but is still fossilized. What all this informs us is that collagen has a unique ability to have some elements of it's molecular structure swapped out in a way (maybe iron or some yet unknown process) that fixes it as is and arrests further degradation. That's the key here. People will argue definitions of "fossilized" all day and Creationists will claim it's proof the Earth is young because fresh collagen is known to have a short life EXCEPT this is altered collagen. Apples and oranges if it's about molecular interactions. Maybe we will have to change definitions. Certainly previous assumptions has been turned over. I would assume these are from bones deposited quickly in mud or some other specific mode if not quick burial. The chemists will eventually figure this one out because everything comes down to basic chemistry even biology.
This is an interesting take that needs consideration. The Triceratops is represented as having lived about 65 million years ago. Allow that to sink in...65 MILLION. That's where we have to start the analysis. What the scientist in this video shows is that there is elastic tissue on the surface of the bone; tissue that is being manipulated to "stretch" and which returns back to its form when released (or thereabouts.) Now, collagen (a most abundant protein) degrades rather quickly. We see its degradation in living organisms (humans) over several decades. Disease, lack of nutrition, trauma, aging can all cause degradation in the living organism. With this bone, or horn, we see tissue on its un-living surface. This horn, I think we can safely assume, was immediately exposed to things that we know degenerates will tissue very quickly, such as lack of oxygen, sunlight, air, dirt, bacteria, critters of all sorts. Unless the horn was buried very quickly (a rapid flood?), it would be a very real stretch to conclude that the portions of the external tissue were replaced, by, or protected by, iron or traces of zinc or some other metal, thereby allowing it to maintain its basic composition over 65 million years. Again MILLION has to be emphasized here. Even if rapidly buried, I'd have to see the research about what happens to collagen over time when encased in a hard substance, such as rock.
Dinosaur footprints have been found along side human footprints on various riverbeds...So none of this is surprising. When confronted about this fact, a specialist in the field stated that obviously there were dinosaurs with human feet....LOL
No they have not. Non human footprints, often with hind claws have been found and claimed as human by pseudo scientists.
LOL
No they have not been. What people mistake for human footprints are dinosaur prints eroded by water. Those "footprints" don't even look right for a human foot.
"When confronted about this fact, a specialist in the field stated that obviously there were dinosaurs with human feet....LOL" Why do you lie?
@@katamas832
To be fair, Tasman might not be lying whilst repeating the lie. He may think this tripe is true.
@@katamas832 Wow..those dinosaur prints eroded to 5 toes and even have the compression marks that would be made by a human. You are truly laughable.
You are speaking the truth of solid scientific evidence in the face of the mainstream established line of reasoning. This takes courage and sacrifice. I commend you.
He's a microbiologist talking about a scientific field he isn't trained in and telling us to ignore the explanations of the people who actually discovered the thing he's talking about, because he's a creationist.
Ahh, a new usage of “truth”.
I remember hearing a story as a child. About native Americans fighting this bird that would swoop down and carry them away. It turned out to be a pterodactyl. They supposedly killed one and took a picture of it back in the 1800’s. It was considered an urban legend. I guess it wasn’t to far fetched.
Logical Atheist the story was told, it was never written. Not to mention there was depictions on walls of caves of this pterodactyl going back to the 1500’s.
Interesting post! Thanks for making it public.
Alan Thompson The preservation of soft tissue in fossilised organisms is rare but not unheard of. The Burgess Shale biota are perhaps the best known example. Mary Schweitzer's pioneering work in identifying a new kind of soft tissue preservation has been confirmed time and again since its discovery way back in 2005. It is no longer controversial. Just another example of a new and better understanding replacing the received wisdom. That's science for you!
I find petrified wood sometimes some of the pieces aren't fully petrified and I am told it's millions of years old .I don't believe that. Also .I find wood it is usually in one area like a big flood came.
Another important Q: what does it mean to have CGI depicting a unbiblical description of Earth?
*Hint it's tied to the hip of evolution.
Yes!
I read you ,
I agree , if its real there is no need to fake it , if it isn't real , no amount if faking will make it real . The bible doesn't disprove science and science can't disprove the bible . To the contrary , much of science proves the accuracy of the bible . God created the heavens and the earth , he later created the sun , moon and stars , how could earth revolve around the sun , if the sun was created after the earth ?
I just got done watching a video of how Dr Schweitzer did her research on this off tissue. She was saying that the reason the soft tissue can be possibly preserved for a long period of time is the presence of iron. They were saying that this does something called cross-linking of the proteins in the tissue. I don't understand what that means but that's what they said. They said it makes it leather like. And that this plus the fact that it was inside a bone structure could be how it was preserved for millions of years.
So what does the researcher in this video say about that? I'm not trying to argue, I'm trying to understand because this is two different explanations...
Well the usual argument that I have seen from creationists onto the iron preserving the soft tissue is:
"No that isn't true! Nanananananananana I can't hear you...."
They conveniently ignore that fact because they don't want the earth to be 4.5 billion years old.
Funny how creation scientist can’t be correct but natural scientists are believed no matter what. Despite their biased presuppositions and extreme theories. Mainstream science stifles actual progress because of the money and pride.
Thanks. That was super interesting.
Soft tissue in dinosaur bones means you might still be able to make a unique soup broth.
@@whitepunksvevo1343 bro! 😂😂😂😂
I’d be very interested to know what date he came up with for the specimen?
I would peg it at 4,367 years ago that the triceratops in question died (2348 BC). I don't know how or even if he has attempted to date it beyond saying that it can't be millions of years old, though.
@@franciscodanconia3551 Really? The literal Flood date came three years before Egypt's sixth dynasty began and only thirteen years before Sargon the Great conquered Sumer, soon establishing an empire which stretched from modern Iran to the Mediterranean. Ussher's 2348 BC cannot be the Flood date, because there were too many people on Earth at that time.
The problem with the interpretations of Modern Pharisees is that they look to the letter and miss the spirit. In their arrogant certainty, they cannot see with the Holy Spirit.
The actual Flood date is something like 27,970 BC, which is when one very specific species went extinct. That species was deadly competition for Homo sapiens -- giving the world a special kind of "wickedness," "violence," and "corruption of flesh" that could never again jeopardize God's way upon the Earth after the Flood. (Ref: *_The Bible's Hidden Wisdom)_*
@@RodMartinJr
Are you open to this, the missing 70 years to Adams died in that day sequence. For example those 70 years add up to 25.5 million years if we use Peters time table. But sin is six thousand yrs old. When Abraham and Lot kill Gilgamesh, and the other demons, Gilgamesh is simply known as the Tidal King, giving an acknowledgement to his history.
@@jamesnesbitt2228 Interesting, can you give a link to that?
The length of time scientists claim dinosaurs and humans existed is a stumbling block for many people. Awesome job exposing the TRUTH. Creation and science point to it’s CREATOR!
Great information, real science is ignored by the establishment science.
then its not science
Real science is ignored by people who believe in myths
@@lutkedog1 The origins of life and Evolution are 4,000 year old myths that have their roots in ancient Hinduism.
@@Programm4r
And is there any real value from that religion? like any thing that is provable truth or were those people deluded as christians?
@@lutkedog1 no they were deluded as it seems that you are. Science proves the Christian God true. The Bible has more text that has been PROVEN than any other scientific research in history and yet you still argue? Is that because you don’t want to be held accountable and want to continue living your life as you choose without consequences? Or are you like Christopher Hitchens who could be summed up like this. “There is no God, and I hate Him!”
Thank you for you work, I have been struggling with the concept of an earth that is say 7k. years old, I spend many hours out wondering the Nevada wilderness and have found many interesting things as far as paleontology is concerned, I have concluded that ancient Lohatan contained dinosaurs as few as 4k. years ago. Please dont get me started on 6 fingered folk. THANKS for you work.
As a child , my mother showed me a six fingered man once. He looked quite normal, and I noticed nothing until my mother whispered : "Count his fingers and toes"
This happened in the late seventies in the village of Nieuw Amsterdam in my country Suriname.
Assuming you mean non-avian Dinosaurs, then it’s a shame that your conclusions are incorrect.
The true Christian believes creation and a young earth because it is revealed to him in the Bible. And While the true Christian doesn’t need this evidence, it is nice to have. This is more of a testimony, to the unbelieving world, that God is.
shame there is no evidence for a young earth, just gullible twats
Bingo!
Brovo, I always ask. Where are the scientists that realize the facts before them.
Great job. Fantastic evedence, compelling speaker.
This is the ancient planet im familiar with.
Not just that, but coalifacation happens in decades not thousands of years.
I know this to be a fact, because logs in a lake under Mt. St. Helens in Washington state have already turned to coal. They've been there only 43 years.
The coal deposits around the world are from Noah's flood.
Therefore, there are no dinosaur bones found in coal deposits. .
In fact, dinosaurs aren't as old as taught, however, they are proof that gravity is slowly increasing over time, causing all lifeforms to gradually shrink.
It seems the animals back before the flood were made of sterner stuff, being almost straight from the hand of the Creator.
What flood? There have been many
The theory is that most organism were made of silicone rather than carbon. Silicone is the only element more viable for giant life than carbon.
@@kingdomlamb7741 Get real
@@ethimself5064 I am actually being very real. There is compelling amounts of evidence to back that life used to be silicone.
@@kingdomlamb7741 I have never heard of it anywhere
I watched a video about a certain civilization that depicted humans riding dinosaurs carved in stone tablets and this civilization was around only a few thousand years ago
This guy's understanding of biology is mind blowing! 🤯
Thank God for men like this who are not afraid to speak the truth even when it's extremely unpopular and could have serious consequences. Lord Jesus please protect him and get this message out to as many people who will acknowledge the truth of Genesis chapters 1 to 11 and come to a living relationship with the God who made the heavens and earth in 6 days!
@Louis Johnson Yet, Theistic Evolution has plenty of evidence ignored by these Modern Pharisees.
So amazing! Thank you so much! ❤️ 🙏
Space aliens brought the soft tissue back in time. That's gotta be it.
still more plausible than magic.
Doctor Who did it in his T.A.R.D.I.S. LMAO!
That certainly is one possibility, but based on skimpy evidence. The trouble with biblical literalists (ironically both atheists and fundamentalists) is that they are blinded with their own arrogant certainty and miss an entire universe of possibilities that are far more likely than space aliens. True scientists have more humility and thus can *_discover_* answers, whether they are studying fossils or miracles. Sadly, even scientists can have big egos and egoistic certainty, just like the "creation pseudo-scientists."
John Tminustwentymin
ALONG WITH YOUR VACUOUSNESS....
SmashEX Entertainment Okay now you sound like you came from a drop of water
Love and support from the Philippines!
Bible believing Christians. The most intelligent people in the whole world. The fear of the Lord is the BEGINNING of wisdom.
You show your ignorance. The bible does not say the earth is only 6,000 years old. It does *not* say man and dinosaurs lived together.
Some people take what is written ambiguously and declare that it makes a definitive statement, when it does not. Kind of like what you just did.
@@dancurtis461 "And the seventh day God rested from all His work." Six literal days and nights God created the heavens and the earth and man as well. And on top of that, it gives us a geneology from Jesus back to Adam. A pretty close number to 6,000 years. Your opinion means nothing
@@dancurtis461 do you want more of the scriptures that make it clear the earth is 6,000 years old?
@Common Sense Realist we were also the most prosperous, safe, free, and free thinking and creative country in the World until the government and school started throwing the bible out of schools and started teaching lies of evolution and homosexuality began to be tolerated. This country is in trouble. Without God, you are too.
@Common Sense Realist Ad populum arguments are fallacious. Just because everyone else is doing it doesn't make it right or true my friend. *Did you know that the Theory of Evolution shares characteristics of a religion?*
In 1981-82 in a federal court in Arkansas it was ruled that Creationism can't be taught in schools because "it is not falsifiable." With its history of rewriting itself every time we discover a new problem with it, what would it take to "falsify" evolution today? Hundreds of Living fossils? Allegedly millions of year extinct creatures still alive today? Discovering that numerous allegedly "vestigial" organs actually have a purpose? Finding fully developed vertebrates in the Cambrian explosion? Finding an alleged 70 million year old evolutionary predecessor to land-dwelling mammals still alive today with no signs of evolution? Young soft tissues in a growing number of dinosaur fossils that appear similar to 4000 year old mummies and the Tyrolean ice man? *Did you know that secular scientists recently debunked evolutionist claims of "junk DNA"?*
....or do we just reinterpret all of this evidence against evolution to sustain the evolutionary belief system? Should we hold evolution to the same *religious* standard?
Charles Darwin said "if an *organ* were discovered which could not possibly be explained by numerous, successive, slight modifications, my theory would absolutely break down... but I know not one." Darwin didn't have access to the fields of genetics and embryology when he made up his theory of naturalistic evolution. *How did male and female evolve?* Specifically, how did the two separate, yet interdependent sets of male-female reproductive *organs* with numerous precision-tuned single points of failure, evolve by "numerous, successive, slight modifications" and still enable functional reproduction? Which gender evolved first, and how did it reproduce while the other one was still evolving? Going backwards in the evolutionary story, which of these critical organs do you reduce first "by numerous, successive, slight modifications"?