I'm enjoying the episodes more and more as they approach modern times. Though as a latecomer to channel listen to most of the other ones out of order. But today will be a day that I end knowing more than I did the day before
The problem with being "born free" is not in the fact that the baby needs its parents, but in the fact that if its parents are themseles born free then are said parents free to leave the baby to fend for itself???? Most people would say no and by default the answer would be no they are not born truly free. One is born into this world with obligations to the people in the environment around them.
“Man is born free, but everywhere is found enslaved and in chains” “It would be equally correct to say that sheep are born carnivorous and everywhere eat grass.”
The problem with being "born free" is not in the fact that the baby needs its parents but in the fact that if its parents are themseles truly born free then are said parents free to leave the baby to fend for itself???? Most people would probably say no and by default the answer would be no they are not born truly free. One is born into this world with obligations to the people in the environment around them.
@@post-industrialpeasant3190 In a way, but these obligations are not inherent in that they are socially felt and socially enforced. Technically speaking yes the parents are free to abandon the baby and that does happen quite a lot in nature and in human society.
@@owenrice1756 one is free to do as they please but they are not free from the repercussions of their behavior from the people in the social enviroment that they live in. Hence one is not fully free and soverign but only partially.
These episodes are an absolute treasure trove! Thank you so much! As I was listening, it seems to me that if we agree with Locke then we have to be anti-abortion. If we are entitled to Life, Liberty and Fruits of our Labour, and if parents don't *own* children (anymore than does the king or government), then it's hard not to say that the unborn has a natural right to life. Neither the man nor the woman owns that life. It's a human being that just is not fully developed yet, just like the argument of the child you presented. The unborn never develops into a monkey, pig or rat. So it is a human being - that's how we all came to life. The unborn is no less dependent on the supply of nutrients than a born child. Whether that comes via the umbilical cord or via a milk bottle is irrelevant. I not heard Locke's philosophy, but I like his take on the role of government.
That's not the argument, people that are pro choice dont consider a fetus alive, it is a part of the parent, part of their life and it is their liberty to remove it. That is the argument. We could continue your second argument backwards, a fetus doesnt always turn into a human, there are miscarriages, stillborns, and absorptions, but let's say it did and let's continue the argument further, one could say the egg itself is a human and the sperm, and further the nutrients that made them. The point is the argument is still whether the fetus is alive and the point when you believe it becomes alive and has a right to life and how much you are willing to force the mother to sacrifice her right to liberty to protect the right of life of the fetus. So far as a society we have settled on 3 months after conception with exceptions for certain circumstances.
How lucky are we to be having this debate? Imagine running from a lion holding your baby and your options are drop the baby and live or hold on and you both die.
What is going on? I assume this is a reupload? Are you making a better version or did UA-cam take the originals down? I have watched several episodes but I could find episode 1 or 001 or 01 or whatever a few weeks ago
The father of peace is by his design to follow in the way of Almighty God so to allow the child complete dominion with the grace of forgiveness so to allow complete Freedom for the child who follows the same command of that Almighty God. The word of who commands the one before you so we may evolve from a child mind to a Christ father so to walk in Judah beside all who walk the word.
Bodily rights are important. But if you are trampling over other people's bodily then that is were it should end. If you are are smoker for example, yes, you have the right to poison your body. However you are not allowed to poison other people's bodies by smoking in a non smoking area.
I'm enjoying the episodes more and more as they approach modern times. Though as a latecomer to channel listen to most of the other ones out of order. But today will be a day that I end knowing more than I did the day before
Estos vídeos son increíbles.
Great episode keep up the great work
Locke is an inspiration; we should at least try to be as reasonable as we can. Maybe it can lead to happiness (or at least reduce self harm).
The problem with being "born free" is not in the fact that the baby needs its parents, but in the fact that if its parents are themseles born free then are said parents free to leave the baby to fend for itself???? Most people would say no and by default the answer would be no they are not born truly free. One is born into this world with obligations to the people in the environment around them.
“Man is born free, but everywhere is found enslaved and in chains”
“It would be equally correct to say that sheep are born carnivorous and everywhere eat grass.”
The problem with being "born free" is not in the fact that the baby needs its parents but in the fact that if its parents are themseles truly born free then are said parents free to leave the baby to fend for itself???? Most people would probably say no and by default the answer would be no they are not born truly free. One is born into this world with obligations to the people in the environment around them.
@@post-industrialpeasant3190 In a way, but these obligations are not inherent in that they are socially felt and socially enforced. Technically speaking yes the parents are free to abandon the baby and that does happen quite a lot in nature and in human society.
@@owenrice1756 one is free to do as they please but they are not free from the repercussions of their behavior from the people in the social enviroment that they live in. Hence one is not fully free and soverign but only partially.
These episodes are an absolute treasure trove! Thank you so much! As I was listening, it seems to me that if we agree with Locke then we have to be anti-abortion. If we are entitled to Life, Liberty and Fruits of our Labour, and if parents don't *own* children (anymore than does the king or government), then it's hard not to say that the unborn has a natural right to life. Neither the man nor the woman owns that life. It's a human being that just is not fully developed yet, just like the argument of the child you presented. The unborn never develops into a monkey, pig or rat. So it is a human being - that's how we all came to life. The unborn is no less dependent on the supply of nutrients than a born child. Whether that comes via the umbilical cord or via a milk bottle is irrelevant. I not heard Locke's philosophy, but I like his take on the role of government.
That's not the argument, people that are pro choice dont consider a fetus alive, it is a part of the parent, part of their life and it is their liberty to remove it. That is the argument. We could continue your second argument backwards, a fetus doesnt always turn into a human, there are miscarriages, stillborns, and absorptions, but let's say it did and let's continue the argument further, one could say the egg itself is a human and the sperm, and further the nutrients that made them. The point is the argument is still whether the fetus is alive and the point when you believe it becomes alive and has a right to life and how much you are willing to force the mother to sacrifice her right to liberty to protect the right of life of the fetus. So far as a society we have settled on 3 months after conception with exceptions for certain circumstances.
How lucky are we to be having this debate? Imagine running from a lion holding your baby and your options are drop the baby and live or hold on and you both die.
What is going on? I assume this is a reupload? Are you making a better version or did UA-cam take the originals down?
I have watched several episodes but I could find episode 1 or 001 or 01 or whatever a few weeks ago
I guess the 1 down vote for this video.... is either a irrational person or a irrational bot..
The father of peace is by his design to follow in the way of Almighty God so to allow the child complete dominion with the grace of forgiveness so to allow complete Freedom for the child who follows the same command of that Almighty God. The word of who commands the one before you so we may evolve from a child mind to a Christ father so to walk in Judah beside all who walk the word.
Bodily rights are important. But if you are trampling over other people's bodily then that is were it should end. If you are are smoker for example, yes, you have the right to poison your body. However you are not allowed to poison other people's bodies by smoking in a non smoking area.