Truth is so obscure in these times, and falsehood so established, that, unless we love the truth, we cannot know it! Blaise Pascal said this over 450 years ago and so relevant today more than ever...
@andrew kruth No an-drone, he's telling the TRUTH which you HATE to hear and see. The science (not the pseudo-science you subscribe to), shows undeniably that he's right.
@andrew kruth So how do you explain extreme climate changes long before man came on the scene , and even before he started burning fossil fuels , no it’s just another scam by the rich of the world to get even richer by conning us into paying through the nose to pay for there renewables scam .
@@anthonyporter7475 Here's an exercise. Go onto Google Scholar and try to find a paper that states that global warming is NOT anthropogenic. I'll buy you a beer (or supply a great home brew) if you can.
@@stormbringerseven8288Funny, I was just thinking this morning, this climate change mania, alphabet group craziness, just woke crap...where did it start? Some blame USA, I blame Europe, at first Germany, just because they always come out with some new wave crap...then France, just because it's France...but many are pointing to UK... Works for me....shall we settle with blaming UK?
Disregarding the whole climate change thing, most fossil fuels will run out if we continue at current rate by 2060 would that not affect the price of energy? Renewables WILL become the cheaper energy option in the future, without subsidies
@@nadalfanboi3689 yeah, yeah, yeah, you have been saying this since the 60s. The population explosion Food running out Fossil fuels running out Petrol crisis Blah Blah Blah
@@nadalfanboi3689 if it weren't for subsidies solar wouldn't really exist, certainly not large scale farms. I'm all for a clean environment and continuously trying to do better and the fact is we are. For 2019 the US actually exceeded the targets laid out in the Paris accords which we imo rightfully pulled out of. We sit on an enormous supply of natural gas and right up until it was discovered the environmental movement was in love with the idea of natural gas. What changed? We have plenty of it. It's just hypocrisy, goal post moving and data fixing to try to control people through fear. Young kids today believe the planet is on fire and they're all going to die any second. Nation wide child abuse at the alter of the church of climate is what this should be called.
@@rolanddeschain965 Oh I know they only compete because of subsidies currently, but the fossil fuels prices will increase, and renewable energy technology will improve, its a future investment. My point is there are so many different reasons it is necessary. I'm done now so gl bro was interesting
@P-J Proudhon Like you said, 110 years. The time period is not long enough for there to be any sufficient data. I'm not saying you are wrong. I'm saying the data you have provided does not prove anything.
Same reason they moved the goal posts again saying global warming will kill the planet.. now it's climate change.. Wake up you idiots, the climate changes every single day.. Frankly the argument stops with look at Germany, 70% renewable now and emission output has grown as they go more renewable.. go research how they make solar panels.. by melting coal with quartz.. haha the stupidity of ur average people is unbelievable, the people pushing it are getting rich off it, ur average person is just repeating the same crap they hear cause they think they are righteous.. but just a sheep 😂😂😂😂
Finally some actual honest discussion. It is all about the money.....chase the paper trail and it leads back to the few who have their fingers in all the pies.
@@turnerfamilyinozi so why do humans only contribute three percent of total carbon emissions to the atmosphere? How much carbon dioxide do we need to breathe? What do trees need to convert for the oxygen we breathe?
@@nadalfanboi3689 how about you complain about H2O? You know the gas that makes up 95% of all greenhouse effect. Oops did you forget to program that into your looney prediction models.
@@josephlarrybradley508 Capture their censorship via screenshots. As many as you can. They are already under the national security microscope of several countries, they have been for years and millions know it.
@@djinghiskhan9199 actually you breath it out. 40,000 ppm each breath. The vast majority of co2, 97% of all co2, comes from the oceans alone. It gets absorbed at the poles where it is cold and takes over 1000yrs via ocean currents to get to the warmer equator where it comes out of solution. This is why there is a delay between temp increase and co2 following it. The current increase in co2 is due to the Middle Ages temp increase. The question is does that tiny amount of man made co2 change anything.
Yes. My husband and I have both noticed how cold our winter was this year (West TN). We typically have 0" to 2" snow (total, not just what sticks, I mean what FALLS) tops each year. This year we had 12 days of snow and ice and I believe the final count was around 11". Let's not forget the TX freeze!!! They havent had ice or snow in over 100+!
@@inthelandofmorethansmall7582 TX freeze was engineered - whether you are receptive to that or not - it was. If you’re interested to look at some damning proof, go to geoengineeringwatch (dot) org & watch the doco “The Dimming”. No conspiracy, all fact. Peace ✌️
No, he's a geologist for a mineral company. btw, here's a documentary of how you were duped www.aljazeera.com/program/featured-documentaries/2021/4/17/the-campaign-against-the-climate-debunking-climate-change-denial
For one, he's not a climate scientist, he's a geologist with no background in climatology. Second of all, he's director of Queensland Coal Investments and has a personal financial stake in climate change denialism.
If there's god's as I understand the term, they're inhumane. As such, certainly not perfect nor anything to be worshipped, appeased or cooperated with. There's no such thing as god's. Perhaps just humans exercising the purported powers of gods, but certainly not the judeo-christian hypothesis. You're correct about the climate scamming. It's AMORAL OPPORTUNISM that's at work here Jeff, very bad news, but "pull your socks up", here we go again.
@drew sale Y2K was a real threat to essential equipment - measures were taken and a lot of damage was avoided. You should try and read about it some time.
Back when I was in junior high were all talking about the ice age and how we would all be under 50 feet of ice. Now today all the ice I see is in my freezer. Bull spit*has a long life span
I would love to buy that man lunch and talk with him. Rita would be welcome as she has a sharp wit. To reduce that interview to it's core, "What is the problem?", "We don't have one but we are told that we do".
He hit the nail on the head right there, when he said about reducing carbon emissions to zero “you need to stop breathing”. Hence the Vaccine roll out!
@@grumnut1854 For a start, if we reach absolute zero, then we will starve. That STILL means we would have CO2 levels around 450ppm, which actually is too high. "There is no climate emergency". I think all climate scientists would disagree with that statement.
If climate change is not caused by humans what is causing it? Yes, I know that the climate has always changed. But it needs a cause to make change. Scientists know, when, how and why the climate has changed going back 100’s of million’s of years. The causes include change of the earth’s axis, the axis wobbling, changes in the earth’s orbit, solar output, changes in the percentages of O2 or CO2 in the atmosphere, movement of the continents, change in ocean currents, volcanic out put and the earths albedo. My question is what is causing the present climate change?
@@turnerfamilyinozi the same thing that causes all seasons and all weather. What makes you think anything is different now? It's still doing the same thing it's always done. NTM its actually been one of those ever so random years of colder weather. Just like that huge snow in the late 1800s (before 'fossil fuel' use). Just like the ice age. Just like all the other periods of slightly more exaggerated weather. But again, it's not been WARMER... it's been COLDER for everyone all over the world. This is not unheard of. This is nowhere near record breaking. Its not indicative of an alarming state.
All it takes is a little common sense to understand that recorded temperatures have risen and fallen without any input from humans. You can't fool mother nature.
If climate change is not caused by humans what is causing it? Yes, I know that the climate has always changed. But it needs a cause to make change. Scientists know, when, how and why the climate has changed going back 100’s of million years. The causes include change of the earth’s axis, the axis wobbling, changes in the earth’s orbit, solar output, changes in the percentages of O2 or CO2 in the atmosphere, movement of the continents, change in ocean currents, volcanic out put and the earths albedo. My question is what is causing the present climate change?
@@turnerfamilyinozi You're simply misled if you believe there is a drastic present climate change. The miniscule rise in temps has been going on for over 100 years. It's been colder in Nevada for the last two years than I've ever felt.
@@djinghiskhan9199 Yes, how dare he not type out all the thousands of factors at work and how they interract on a YT comment, and instead refer to them with a common phrase.
@@eucalyptusregnans7741 how dare he go against the bias studies. The same people told us about the ozone layer disappearing which turned out to be a load of bullshit.
@@eucalyptusregnans7741 And how many people got rich while selling the narrative and doing exactly nothing to practice what they preach? Oh yeah, just about all of them.
If climate change is not caused by humans what is causing it? Yes, I know that the climate has always changed. But it needs a cause to make change. Scientists know, when, how and why the climate has changed going back 100’s of million’s of years. The causes include change of the earth’s axis, the axis wobbling, changes in the earth’s orbit, solar output, changes in the percentages of O2 or CO2 in the atmosphere, movement of the continents, change in ocean currents, volcanic out put and the earths albedo. My question is what is causing the present climate change?
@@turnerfamilyinozi the cycles of the sun, go do some research ... Acting like the climate has never been like this before is pure denial of facts. Nothing they have predicted has come true.
@@alanakafang6143 This cycle is only every 11 years, meaning it might cause some fluctuation in data of CO2 in the atmosphere by year but the 100 year trend is still clear. Also he actually states the climate has gone through stages like this before through environmental events, not being in denial of facts.
@@alanakafang6143 You didn't do any research did you? You just made it up. To paraphrase Monty Python 'You're just a naughty boy'. You know the mob that flew a helicopter on Mars, um, oh yeah NASA. Well they disagree with you. I think they might know a thing or two about the sun. climate.nasa.gov/faq/14/is-the-sun-causing-global-warming/ Hang on for a sec. Sorry I was talking to Scientific American and they are wondering what you on. www.scientificamerican.com/article/sun-spots-and-climate-change/
@@turnerfamilyinozi buddy for every one of these you produce, I can produce two opposing ones, even from NASA itself. You use generalized ridicule because you have no truths Robert, grow up 👍
Biden set me straight in the zoom call, I thought the stuff falling out of the sky on the 24th was snow, but it was really very small plastic balls used in shipping Al Gore manpigbear dolls.
A person only has to look around to see so little change, of what we are told by authority. Is to be alarmed over? Gotta' be a little on the slow side, of the boat...
Mr. Tesla showed at beginning of 20th century. How to utilize the natural electricity all around. JP Morgan destroyed his discoveries because .. ITS FREE and the Wiley ol' banker couldn't abide that. It is an electric universe in all sense of the words... I guess?
@@hirundine44 The emissions to visible effects has a massive lag time, meaning you'll only see large change when it is too late to stop it from happening, hence the pressure to do something now. There are some global changes we've seen likely a causation but understandably not enough for people to accept as proof
I remember back in the early 90's I came across data from the core samples taken at one of the earths pole's and it showed a repeating pattern of climate shift of global warming and an ice age if memory serves every 20,000 - 24,000 years or so - so it is real - but happens as a natural cycle not solely caused by the events of man....
Yes, in the cold war the US had a base at the Nirth Pole and scientists decided to take ice cores for research. There were all the different states of the earth for millenia. The Yiunger Dryas was plain to see, the great catast6that killed the dinosaurs was evident and also all the differences in the climate.
Hole in the ozone is coming in w w 3 . I read about it in the late 70s. Low tech weapon of mass destruction, for poor countries. Put cloro-floro-carbons in hot air balloons, release in upper atmosphere, create big hole in ozone layer about 20 miles across. Everything that can't get out of the sun will cook in ultraviolet radiation in about 20 minutes! Plants will will wilt and Everything else will get sunburned. They have no idea how long it will take to dissipate. It could take years. If several are used the damage could be world wide. We would not need to worry about nukes! No ozone we all have to hide for years.
Well said. thanks Rita and Mr. Ian Plimer. No pandering, weasel words, self contradiction, just the facts Ma'am. A rare thing indeed when discussing "climate change/Global warming" - he even mentions consequences. Nice.
For Americans & others ..A ' Punter" is " A customer , a user of services, a buyer of goods " , " someone who risks their money guessing the results of something " :)
I'm frankly very tired to live in this world. Is starting to be way to disgusting, in many ways. I'm 37 and people ask me when I will have kids: the answer is never. I cannot let anybody be part of the pain of the world that is a bout to become. I will just live my life the best way I can, waiting my time to come. I always been scared of death, now I see it only as a ticket to freedom. How sad is that.
Take yourself camping and light a camp fire, cook some steak, roast marshmellows and spare a thought for the over 50's who are not demented enough to be able to ignore it.
Don’t ruin your life because of Woke bullshit , Just remember they are the miserable minority and are becoming more irrelevant , Children are a gift and give you perspective , I had my son at a time we were constantly threatened by Nuclear war, a real threat , not an imaginary one , He’s the best thing in my life
Please have the joys of raising your children, but teach your children well, don't let them be missed by woke teacher and schools. Turn of the TV/Radio
He's right, and Co2 IR absorption is logarithmic, not linear, and our levels are already sufficiently past 90% of it's absorption capacity that you'd need to quadruple the amount currently in the atmosphere to see more than 1 degree Celsius difference.
and only 3% of the observed increase is due to man made emissions - the net effect of man made emissions over the last century is .01C - this is lost in the noise of global temperature measurements.
)BTW it IS logarithmic, but the fact temperature is going up in a straight line should tell you something. Look up "co2 saturated". The video there is most instructive for the first result.
@@grumnut1854 Except... it's not going up. We've been on a cooling trend for the last ~15 years. Co2's effect on temperatures is so marginal it's a joke. Therefore, it's NOT Co2.
@@AximandTheCursed )Try wood for trees, where Dr Roy Spencer from UAH has posed his satellite data since 1987. He also has his models (Yes, you need to use models for satellite data). You'll be shocked, and he agrees with Plimer.
Would a climate alarmist please explain, how the ice sheets melted during the last ice age, seeing as there weren't many humans around back then to blame?.
@P-J Proudhon Yes PJ, it certainly has cycles, yet this little factor never seems to be discussed?. Its as if all these climate know-alls dont recognize earths history.
As an amateur, my concern is the visible pollution of all the oceans, seas, rivers and lakes of the world. In our Banana River, I have seen dead baby sea turtles, while the monarch butterfly migration has ended in this eastern flyway.
Unfortunately, that's a very misleading figure. 50% of the CO2 in the atmosphere is due to human emissions. We know this because atmospheric CO2 level remained stable at about 275PPM for many 1000's of years before the start of the industrial age, since which time they have increased by 50% to over 410PPM. The truth is that while nature does release a lot more CO2 into the atmosphere, it also sinks as much as it sources. Humans don't sink any of the CO2 they source, so it accumulates, and that's the problem.
@@simonharris4873 that's incorrect. The ppm is correct but the connection between ppm and human activity is not made.causation is not correlation. Co2 ppm has been far higher at various times in planetary history.
@@rolanddeschain965 The people who told you that CO2 has been far higher in the past also say that the current CO2 increase is man made. You can't have it both ways. And the paradigm of correlation not equating to causality is only valid for isolated events. Man increasing CO2 output followed by an increase in atmospheric CO2 are not isolated events, they're directly linked events. Ask your high school science teacher to explain the difference.
Total CO2 in our atmosphere = 0.04% Man-made CO2 = 3% of the above 0.04% 3% of 0.04% = 0.0012% Thus total global man-made CO2 in our atmosphere = 0.0012% Mathematically, 0.0012% = *ZERO!!!*
@@grumnut1854 _It's now 0.043%_ ... Big deal. Concentrations of CO2 in the atmosphere were as high as 0.4% (4,000 ppm) during the Cambrian period - that's TEN TIMES what they are today - and the planet didn't boil, in fact vegetation and life thrived! Guess what?... that's why farmers actually pump CO2 into their industrial greenhouses! _Man-made CO2 = 50% of the above not 3%_ ... Err, "DON'T BE RIDICULOUS!" _Ozone is 0.00006%_ ... And??? _Try removing it and see if we last the week._ ... If you're talking about removing Ozone and thus damaging the Ozone layer, err, how is an increase in CO2 going to do that??? Perhaps you're confusing carbon dioxide with chlorine monoxide or chlorofluorocarbons?! 🙄 BUT... even if your absurd 50% man-made figure was to be correct, total (all countries combined) man-made atmospheric CO2 would still only be 0.21%, which is still close to ZERO! Better luck next time 😂
@@MarekzAnglii )"Concentrations of CO2 in the atmosphere were as high as 0.4% (4,000 ppm) during the Cambrian period - that's TEN TIMES what they are today - and the planet didn't boil, in fact vegetation and life thrived!" Yes when CO2 was 4000ppm the Sun was 5% weaker. In fact most of the Earth was barren at that time. "that's why farmers actually pump CO2 into their industrial greenhouses!" Yes...greenhouses, not open fields where you can't control nutrients. Search "Simon Clark more food" as to why crops such as wheat and rice are being badly affected. "Ozone is 0.00006% ... And???" I think you were saying that 0.04% is not that much. In fact it's 97 billion molecules of CO2 per cubic inch. If we could see at 15 microns, we could see about a meter. "BUT... even if your absurd 50% man-made figure was to be correct, total (all countries combined) man-made atmospheric CO2 would still only be 0.21%, which is still close to ZERO! " No man-made atmospheric CO2 would be 50% also. Think about it for a second It's gone from 280ppm, where it has stayed for the last 11,000 years to 423ppm in 150 years. ALL of that increase is due to us. We know due to the isotopic ratios of the carbon in the CO2.
Greens tell lies. Australias peak scientific body, the CSIRO, hasn't been able to provide any evidence that CO2 is driving catastrophic climate change.
If climate change is not caused by humans what is causing it? Yes, I know that the climate has always changed. But it needs a cause to make change. Scientists know, when, how and why the climate has changed going back 100’s of million’s of years. The causes include change of the earth’s axis, the axis wobbling, changes in the earth’s orbit, solar output, changes in the percentages of O2 or CO2 in the atmosphere, movement of the continents, change in ocean currents, volcanic out put and the earths albedo. My question is what is causing the present climate change?
@@chrisgould101 Now. now. That's pretty rich coming from a guy, who yesterday refused to answer my question on the specific cause of our current climate change. Just in case you missed it here it is again. If climate change is not caused by humans what is causing it? Yes, I know that the climate has always changed. But it needs a cause to make change. Scientists know, when, how and why the climate has changed going back 100’s of million of years. The causes include change of the earth’s axis, the axis wobbling, changes in the earth’s orbit, solar output, changes in the percentages of O2 or CO2 in the atmosphere, movement of the continents, change in ocean currents, volcanic out put and the earths albedo. My question is what is causing the present climate change?
experimental how? - all vaccines, certainly UK and US ones have been approved by regulators - therefore , they're only experimental in your fear ravaged delusions Karen
He is a geoligist there are plenty of his vids for ppl to find calling out the co2 scam if the lazy people do some duck duck go . it's curtains for Greta's scam
I am a scientist and teacher of science, Professor Plimer is absolutely correct in what he says. Fear is what you listen to, since you obviously do not understand the scientific rational of what he is saying..
“In a time of deceit telling the truth is a revolutionary act.”
― George Orwell
Truth is so obscure in these times, and falsehood so established, that, unless we love the truth, we cannot know it!
Blaise Pascal said this over 450 years ago and so relevant today more than ever...
I noticed that lately people have been replacing the word "truth" with words like "facts" or "science".
We are not being blinded by brilliance we are being baffled by bullshit
how dare you
@@garyjohnson5710 no, now it’s I demand.......
@andrew kruth lol
Biggest con since Gengis.
Love the alliteration mate (and can't disagree with sentiment)
Wow this man is great, hitting the nail on the head
Yes, we need more bulldozers like this. And the media inviting them to speak out loud.
@andrew kruth No an-drone, he's telling the TRUTH which you HATE to hear and see. The science (not the pseudo-science you subscribe to), shows undeniably that he's right.
Read his book, Not for Greens , opens your eyes to the biggest scam going , the renewables industry .
@andrew kruth So how do you explain extreme climate changes long before man came on the scene , and even before he started burning fossil fuels , no it’s just another scam by the rich of the world to get even richer by conning us into paying through the nose to pay for there renewables scam .
@@anthonyporter7475 Here's an exercise. Go onto Google Scholar and try to find a paper that states that global warming is NOT anthropogenic. I'll buy you a beer (or supply a great home brew) if you can.
I sure enjoy hearing and appreciate the very uncommon "sense" that comes from our Australian friends. 🇺🇲
Yes, they learned it from the British, who have forgotten it.
@@stormbringerseven8288Funny, I was just thinking this morning, this climate change mania, alphabet group craziness, just woke crap...where did it start? Some blame USA, I blame Europe, at first Germany, just because they always come out with some new wave crap...then France, just because it's France...but many are pointing to UK... Works for me....shall we settle with blaming UK?
" misled " is putting it extremely mildly. It's not even about the environment anymore.
Disregarding the whole climate change thing, most fossil fuels will run out if we continue at current rate by 2060 would that not affect the price of energy? Renewables WILL become the cheaper energy option in the future, without subsidies
@@nadalfanboi3689 yeah, yeah, yeah, you have been saying this since the 60s.
The population explosion
Food running out
Fossil fuels running out
Petrol crisis
Blah
Blah
Blah
@@nadalfanboi3689 if it weren't for subsidies solar wouldn't really exist, certainly not large scale farms. I'm all for a clean environment and continuously trying to do better and the fact is we are. For 2019 the US actually exceeded the targets laid out in the Paris accords which we imo rightfully pulled out of. We sit on an enormous supply of natural gas and right up until it was discovered the environmental movement was in love with the idea of natural gas. What changed? We have plenty of it. It's just hypocrisy, goal post moving and data fixing to try to control people through fear. Young kids today believe the planet is on fire and they're all going to die any second. Nation wide child abuse at the alter of the church of climate is what this should be called.
@@fugawiaus Lol alright mate
@@rolanddeschain965 Oh I know they only compete because of subsidies currently, but the fossil fuels prices will increase, and renewable energy technology will improve, its a future investment. My point is there are so many different reasons it is necessary. I'm done now so gl bro was interesting
52 years in Australia and I have just shivered through the coolest summer season that I can remember
@P-J Proudhon Like you said, 110 years. The time period is not long enough for there to be any sufficient data. I'm not saying you are wrong. I'm saying the data you have provided does not prove anything.
@P-J Proudhon the records indicate that it was hotter in the 1800s... but, you greens deny the science, ignore the data and tell lies...
True
Same reason they moved the goal posts again saying global warming will kill the planet.. now it's climate change..
Wake up you idiots, the climate changes every single day..
Frankly the argument stops with look at Germany, 70% renewable now and emission output has grown as they go more renewable.. go research how they make solar panels.. by melting coal with quartz.. haha the stupidity of ur average people is unbelievable, the people pushing it are getting rich off it, ur average person is just repeating the same crap they hear cause they think they are righteous.. but just a sheep 😂😂😂😂
@@typearce1823 and before that it was global cooling and the next ice age. These people are snake oil salesmen and nothing more.
ANXIETY IS BORN OUT OF IGNORANCE!
Finally some actual honest discussion. It is all about the money.....chase the paper trail and it leads back to the few who have their fingers in all the pies.
Correct the fuel companies, Murdoch's media and crooked right wing politicians are all profiting at the expense of the future.
@@turnerfamilyinozi so why do humans only contribute three percent of total carbon emissions to the atmosphere? How much carbon dioxide do we need to breathe? What do trees need to convert for the oxygen we breathe?
@@ShannonCarter55 This 3% isn't a cycle, the remaining 97% is, it's a 'misleading' statistic coming from a man claiming we are being 'misled'
@@nadalfanboi3689 stop breathing and find out.
@@nadalfanboi3689 how about you complain about H2O? You know the gas that makes up 95% of all greenhouse effect.
Oops did you forget to program that into your looney prediction models.
The UA-cam Mods are VERY busy tonight! I have 23 screenshots of deleted comments in under 3 minutes. 😁. Evidence is a beautiful thing.
We redpill them like crazy...
@Megan McKenzie: OK. Now What? What Can We Do except Move and Encourage Content Creators to Move to Alt Platforms?
@@josephlarrybradley508 MSM is where the fight is at
@@josephlarrybradley508 Capture their censorship via screenshots. As many as you can. They are already under the national security microscope of several countries, they have been for years and millions know it.
We need evidence to hang traitors?
This man, speaks the truth. It's about $ for the N W O.
This bloke is exactly right.. net zero means no breathing.
There will be a breathing tax next
Heard of trees?
well no, breathing is the dumbest climate denier myth ever. Co2 comes from somewhere, it doesn't originate from us.
@@djinghiskhan9199 actually you breath it out. 40,000 ppm each breath.
The vast majority of co2, 97% of all co2, comes from the oceans alone. It gets absorbed at the poles where it is cold and takes over 1000yrs via ocean currents to get to the warmer equator where it comes out of solution. This is why there is a delay between temp increase and co2 following it. The current increase in co2 is due to the Middle Ages temp increase.
The question is does that tiny amount of man made co2 change anything.
ua-cam.com/video/0wRHA_3_Xa8/v-deo.html
Thank you for the truth😁
...and the common sense, This alone makes you feel better.
I’m in Spain , this is the coolest Spring we’ve had in my memory , Someone tell Greta !
You can't "tell Greta" anything or "sleepy Joe" both are a waste of space and oxygen.
Yes. My husband and I have both noticed how cold our winter was this year (West TN).
We typically have 0" to 2" snow (total, not just what sticks, I mean what FALLS) tops each year.
This year we had 12 days of snow and ice and I believe the final count was around 11".
Let's not forget the TX freeze!!!
They havent had ice or snow in over 100+!
Fuck greta, she really should calm down.
@@inthelandofmorethansmall7582 TX freeze was engineered - whether you are receptive to that or not - it was. If you’re interested to look at some damning proof, go to geoengineeringwatch (dot) org & watch the doco “The Dimming”. No conspiracy, all fact. Peace ✌️
In SA diesel generators in all government buildings to the tune of millions. All so they can claim the state runs off renewables.
Excellent report, common sense and factual, thank you!
Nature will continue doing what Nature did for Billion of years without asking permission of Politician or People trying to be smarter than God!!
Good man... keep spreading the truth
great to see the truth on mainstream news, well done sky news Australia!
What a waste of money when they get all these windmills and electric cars and solar panels in place and we head into the deep freeze then what
Good to have you back Ian. The smartest climate scientist on earth.
No, he's a geologist for a mineral company. btw, here's a documentary of how you were duped www.aljazeera.com/program/featured-documentaries/2021/4/17/the-campaign-against-the-climate-debunking-climate-change-denial
As opposed to a scientist for the IPCC
@@timmcgrath9708 as opposed to a paid shill ftom the IPCC
@@coal_man Correct
For one, he's not a climate scientist, he's a geologist with no background in climatology. Second of all, he's director of Queensland Coal Investments and has a personal financial stake in climate change denialism.
“It is usually futile to try to talk facts and analysis to people who are enjoying a sense of moral superiority in their ignorance”- Thomas Sowell
Exactly Plimer has been debunked so many times it's getting embarrassing.
You are doing God's work, sir.
Keep exposing the climate scam!
If there's god's as I understand the term, they're inhumane. As such, certainly not perfect nor anything to be worshipped, appeased or cooperated with. There's no such thing as god's. Perhaps just humans exercising the purported powers of gods, but certainly not the judeo-christian hypothesis. You're correct about the climate scamming. It's AMORAL OPPORTUNISM that's at work here Jeff, very bad news, but "pull your socks up", here we go again.
I remember the time around 1970 when they claimed that we would be out of resources already now. Looks like we did not.
We were heading for an ice age too.
@drew sale Y2K was a real threat to essential equipment - measures were taken and a lot of damage was avoided. You should try and read about it some time.
I have been following Ian Plimmer for about fifteen years now. He is the glimmer of hope in the dark world of media and politician crisis mongering!
)A pity he falls apart at the first fact check.
Back when I was in junior high were all talking about the ice age and how we would all be under 50 feet of ice. Now today all the ice I see is in my freezer. Bull spit*has a long life span
We would be on top of that ice, not under it!
Actually we are headed into the next ice age cycle.
) There were only 6 papers warning of an ice age, and 40 warning of global warming. We did something about it. We're asking to do the same again.
I would love to buy that man lunch and talk with him. Rita would be welcome as she has a sharp wit. To reduce that interview to it's core, "What is the problem?", "We don't have one but we are told that we do".
When so much money is involved, all the usual suspects will lie to keep the "green" gravy train on the tracks.
Coldest spring in UK since 1980 apparently. Globally coldest period in last 80 years.....says it all.
He hit the nail on the head right there, when he said about reducing carbon emissions to zero “you need to stop breathing”. Hence the Vaccine roll out!
@Dale the human Ohhhhh… so the masks actually do have a purpose. Well, in that case… 😷👌
@@stellaqaustralia lol 😘
Why can't this man be heard by the masses..........oh that's right ....he's speaking the truth....that doesn't count. No money to be made in that!!
He is a mining executive.
@@eucalyptusregnans7741 So that means what exactly? He's lying? If you can't make sense of what he's saying then that's your problem!
@@nuclearfishin1185 ) Yes he IS lying. Blatantly.
@@grumnut1854 Explain what he is lying about? 🤔
@@grumnut1854 For a start, if we reach absolute zero, then we will starve. That STILL means we would have CO2 levels around 450ppm, which actually is too high.
"There is no climate emergency". I think all climate scientists would disagree with that statement.
Greens tell lies
So do feminists.
@@onepom63 cut from the same cloth
So do right wingers.
@@eucalyptusregnans7741 So do Left whingers
Changing the c l i m a t e won't stop
c l i m a t e change...
Censorship is real.
Just wait until you're shadow banned and you don't even know.
@@coal_man I reposted this comment several times... I know 😁
@@coal_man No, you are not being censored - id say it's an inability to use a keyboard and mouse.
@Georgina Cox Who asked for yours denier )
We are all being conned...again...............
By Murdoch media? I agree!
If climate change is not caused by humans what is causing it? Yes, I know that the climate has always changed. But it needs a cause to make change.
Scientists know, when, how and why the climate has changed going back 100’s of million’s of years. The causes include change of the earth’s axis, the axis wobbling, changes in the earth’s orbit, solar output, changes in the percentages of O2 or CO2 in the atmosphere, movement of the continents, change in ocean currents, volcanic out put and the earths albedo.
My question is what is causing the present climate change?
@@turnerfamilyinozi the same thing that causes all seasons and all weather.
What makes you think anything is different now?
It's still doing the same thing it's always done. NTM its actually been one of those ever so random years of colder weather.
Just like that huge snow in the late 1800s (before 'fossil fuel' use).
Just like the ice age. Just like all the other periods of slightly more exaggerated weather.
But again, it's not been WARMER... it's been COLDER for everyone all over the world.
This is not unheard of. This is nowhere near record breaking. Its not indicative of an alarming state.
And the ABC is leading the charge!
All it takes is a little common sense to understand that recorded temperatures have risen and fallen without any input from humans. You can't fool mother nature.
If climate change is not caused by humans what is causing it? Yes, I know that the climate has always changed. But it needs a cause to make change.
Scientists know, when, how and why the climate has changed going back 100’s of million years. The causes include change of the earth’s axis, the axis wobbling, changes in the earth’s orbit, solar output, changes in the percentages of O2 or CO2 in the atmosphere, movement of the continents, change in ocean currents, volcanic out put and the earths albedo.
My question is what is causing the present climate change?
"mother nature" you say common sense yet you say mother nature? lol how very scientific of you
@@turnerfamilyinozi You're simply misled if you believe there is a drastic present climate change. The miniscule rise in temps has been going on for over 100 years. It's been colder in Nevada for the last two years than I've ever felt.
@@djinghiskhan9199 You flat earthers are not worth the bother to even have a discussion with.
@@djinghiskhan9199 Yes, how dare he not type out all the thousands of factors at work and how they interract on a YT comment, and instead refer to them with a common phrase.
“To argue with a person who has renounced the use of reason, is like administering medicine to the dead”. Thomas Paine
You know how much "pollution" comes out of the earth, plants and animals its self - a lot, and we are still here
Amen!! Slight disagreement. They are not wasting money…. But transferring money! The poor are too comfortable and living too long.
Yep, and they are too busy actually breeding rather than neutering themselves....
Well, who could have possibly thought!
You mean apart from science deniers? Nobody really.
3% of climate scientists and non scientists commenting on science
@@nadalfanboi3689 It's the only way some people can make a name for themselves. I wonder how many of those 3% have a book deal going.
@@simonharris4873 Exactly, I'm all for forming your own opinion but if 4/5 is a majority, 32/33 should be enough to question your views
Spot on Mr Plimer
Mr Plimer the mining executive.
@@eucalyptusregnans7741 how dare he go against the bias studies. The same people told us about the ozone layer disappearing which turned out to be a load of bullshit.
@@eucalyptusregnans7741 And how many people got rich while selling the narrative and doing exactly nothing to practice what they preach? Oh yeah, just about all of them.
Thanks Ian Palmer...straight to the point!!!
If climate change is not caused by humans what is causing it? Yes, I know that the climate has always changed. But it needs a cause to make change.
Scientists know, when, how and why the climate has changed going back 100’s of million’s of years. The causes include change of the earth’s axis, the axis wobbling, changes in the earth’s orbit, solar output, changes in the percentages of O2 or CO2 in the atmosphere, movement of the continents, change in ocean currents, volcanic out put and the earths albedo.
My question is what is causing the present climate change?
@@turnerfamilyinozi the cycles of the sun, go do some research ...
Acting like the climate has never been like this before is pure denial of facts.
Nothing they have predicted has come true.
@@alanakafang6143 This cycle is only every 11 years, meaning it might cause some fluctuation in data of CO2 in the atmosphere by year but the 100 year trend is still clear. Also he actually states the climate has gone through stages like this before through environmental events, not being in denial of facts.
@@alanakafang6143 You didn't do any research did you? You just made it up. To paraphrase Monty Python 'You're just a naughty boy'.
You know the mob that flew a helicopter on Mars, um, oh yeah NASA. Well they disagree with you. I think they might know a thing or two about the sun.
climate.nasa.gov/faq/14/is-the-sun-causing-global-warming/
Hang on for a sec. Sorry I was talking to Scientific American and they are wondering what you on.
www.scientificamerican.com/article/sun-spots-and-climate-change/
@@turnerfamilyinozi buddy for every one of these you produce, I can produce two opposing ones, even from NASA itself.
You use generalized ridicule because you have no truths Robert, grow up 👍
Read Plimers book, the Man speaks the simple truth.
Global warming is here, yeah that's why we're freezing here in the UK. I'd like to find global warming but struggling...
I'm going to move to Global Warming when i retire - not sure exactly where this is but the weather is suppose to be nice.
Biden set me straight in the zoom call, I thought the stuff falling out of the sky on the 24th was snow, but it was really very small plastic balls used in shipping Al Gore manpigbear dolls.
Bloody brilliant
There is NO CLIMATE CRISIS
Thanks for the sanity check.
A person only has to look around to see so little change, of what we are told by authority. Is to be alarmed over? Gotta' be a little on the slow side, of the boat...
Mr. Tesla showed at beginning of 20th century. How to utilize the natural electricity all around. JP Morgan destroyed his discoveries because .. ITS FREE and the Wiley ol' banker couldn't abide that. It is an electric universe in all sense of the words... I guess?
@@hirundine44 Your evidence for this bizarre claim is?
@@turnerfamilyinozi Look it up.. not here for spoon feed... sorry!
@@hirundine44 The emissions to visible effects has a massive lag time, meaning you'll only see large change when it is too late to stop it from happening, hence the pressure to do something now. There are some global changes we've seen likely a causation but understandably not enough for people to accept as proof
@@nadalfanboi3689 nice story bro .. what's your next excuse ...
That’s the least of our worries! We are being mislead on covid!
Yep you are right but it is happening everywhere. This year will especially ramp up
The truth from Down Under, Aussie Sky news cuts through the crap yet again.
Lookin' good Rita!
“...the object of waging a war is always to be in a better position in which to wage another war.”
I remember back in the early 90's I came across data from the core samples taken at one of the earths pole's and it showed a repeating pattern of climate shift of global warming and an ice age if memory serves every 20,000 - 24,000 years or so - so it is real - but happens as a natural cycle not solely caused by the events of man....
Yes, in the cold war the US had a base at the Nirth Pole and scientists decided to take ice cores for research.
There were all the different states of the earth for millenia. The Yiunger Dryas was plain to see, the great catast6that killed the dinosaurs was evident and also all the differences in the climate.
)That's right. It's now US that's upsetting the apple cart.
These two are daftly ignoring an overall reality.
Hole in the Ozone layer???? Don't hear about that do we big thing in the 90..s
Banning ozone depleting CFCs probably has something to do with the ozone hole improving. Still not completely repaired though.
Ooh it hasn’t mended , what a crock
Of shit
Yeah we banned CFC's and the ozone hole just healed up. Miracle ?
Hole in the ozone is coming in w w 3 . I read about it in the late 70s. Low tech weapon of mass destruction, for poor countries. Put cloro-floro-carbons in hot air balloons, release in upper atmosphere, create big hole in ozone layer about 20 miles across. Everything that can't get out of the sun will cook in ultraviolet radiation in about 20 minutes! Plants will will wilt and Everything else will get sunburned. They have no idea how long it will take to dissipate. It could take years. If several are used the damage could be world wide. We would not need to worry about nukes! No ozone we all have to hide for years.
Acid rain, Y2K....eXpeRtS and sCiEnTiStS
Well said. thanks Rita and Mr. Ian Plimer. No pandering, weasel words, self contradiction, just the facts Ma'am.
A rare thing indeed when discussing "climate change/Global warming" - he even mentions consequences. Nice.
Thank You - Sky News ( You Rock ) :-)
Love this guy - speaking truth! People need to get a grip on all this climate alarmism and think calmly & rationally.
For Americans & others ..A ' Punter" is " A customer , a user of services, a buyer of goods " , " someone who risks their money guessing the results of something " :)
Yes like the stock markets
I'm frankly very tired to live in this world. Is starting to be way to disgusting, in many ways. I'm 37 and people ask me when I will have kids: the answer is never. I cannot let anybody be part of the pain of the world that is a bout to become. I will just live my life the best way I can, waiting my time to come. I always been scared of death, now I see it only as a ticket to freedom. How sad is that.
Take yourself camping and light a camp fire, cook some steak, roast marshmellows and spare a thought for the over 50's who are not demented enough to be able to ignore it.
Don’t ruin your life because of Woke bullshit , Just remember they are the miserable minority and are becoming more irrelevant , Children are a gift and give you perspective , I had my son at a time we were constantly threatened by Nuclear war, a real threat , not an imaginary one , He’s the best thing in my life
Please have the joys of raising your children, but teach your children well, don't let them be missed by woke teacher and schools.
Turn of the TV/Radio
@@blackprince4074 That is a very kind comment, we do have a future, humanity and truth have always survived.
@@franminky7763 Thank you
He's right, and Co2 IR absorption is logarithmic, not linear, and our levels are already sufficiently past 90% of it's absorption capacity that you'd need to quadruple the amount currently in the atmosphere to see more than 1 degree Celsius difference.
and only 3% of the observed increase is due to man made emissions - the net effect of man made emissions over the last century is .01C - this is lost in the noise of global temperature measurements.
@@doctorstrangelove798 No, it's now 50%. You can work it out on your calculator. We should actually be cooler than wee were in 1850, but we're not.
)BTW it IS logarithmic, but the fact temperature is going up in a straight line should tell you something. Look up "co2 saturated". The video there is most instructive for the first result.
@@grumnut1854 Except... it's not going up. We've been on a cooling trend for the last ~15 years. Co2's effect on temperatures is so marginal it's a joke. Therefore, it's NOT Co2.
@@AximandTheCursed )Try wood for trees, where Dr Roy Spencer from UAH has posed his satellite data since 1987. He also has his models (Yes, you need to use models for satellite data). You'll be shocked, and he agrees with Plimer.
It is a pleasure to follow you even from Italy. Here, our temperatures are very low for this month, and have had snow on the 13th and on the 15th.
Would a climate alarmist please explain, how the ice sheets melted during the last ice age, seeing as there weren't many humans around back then to blame?.
No 😅
@P-J Proudhon Yes PJ, it certainly has cycles, yet this little factor never seems to be discussed?. Its as if all these climate know-alls dont recognize earths history.
@P-J Proudhon In the last 3 years, i have not heard 1 person on main stream media, mention the earths cycles and how they effect the climate.
In our short orbit earth warms, in our longer orbit earth cools.
@@HelloWorld-ns7gt Yes, thats my understanding of it as well. From what i can gather, this process takes 27,000 years.
Good onya Rita... and the smile at the end of interview. Godspeed.
Depending on one stream of income had never made any millionaire and earning check don't put you on forbes
Investing in crypto now should be in every wise individuals list, in some months time you'll be ecstatic with the decision you made today.
I totally agree with that
Crypto is the new gold
I tried investing once but withdrew due to the fluctuations in price
You are right, in the past I tried trading on my own but made almost no profit until I was link to a professional, the result was exceptional
Spot on Mr Plimer !!!
As an amateur, my concern is the visible pollution of all the oceans, seas, rivers and lakes of the world.
In our Banana River, I have seen dead baby sea turtles, while the monarch butterfly migration has ended in this eastern flyway.
These are actual problems.
At last a true greenie. This is a much bigger problem than imaginary climate change.
Yes, funny how the respective governments NEVER tell you to buy less stuff. Tells you all you need to know...
Well said , all about the money
"It's all about the money," says Ian Plimer, coal industry spokesman and owner of fossil fuel industry stock. Too funny.
Co2 is innocent
We cannot control the universe. Only God has the power to do that.
Only three percent? Huh....interesting. Very informative. Thank you!!!
Unfortunately, that's a very misleading figure. 50% of the CO2 in the atmosphere is due to human emissions. We know this because atmospheric CO2 level remained stable at about 275PPM for many 1000's of years before the start of the industrial age, since which time they have increased by 50% to over 410PPM. The truth is that while nature does release a lot more CO2 into the atmosphere, it also sinks as much as it sources. Humans don't sink any of the CO2 they source, so it accumulates, and that's the problem.
@@simonharris4873 that's incorrect. The ppm is correct but the connection between ppm and human activity is not made.causation is not correlation. Co2 ppm has been far higher at various times in planetary history.
@@rolanddeschain965 The people who told you that CO2 has been far higher in the past also say that the current CO2 increase is man made. You can't have it both ways. And the paradigm of correlation not equating to causality is only valid for isolated events. Man increasing CO2 output followed by an increase in atmospheric CO2 are not isolated events, they're directly linked events. Ask your high school science teacher to explain the difference.
@@simonharris4873 so now you're just lying. Cool, have fun.
@@rolanddeschain965 No, I'm not.
We used to here we're running out of oil so prices go up and we were hoodwinked because the earth makes oil everyday.
Today people can't think for themselves including the scientists.
Awesome guys!
Ty Skynews.
THE WORLD NEEDS MORE TRUTH BEING TOLD. YOU NEED TO SCREAM LOUDER MY FRIENDS. NEED TO RAMP UP THE COVERAGE AND PUBLICITY, OR ITS JUST PILLOW TALK.
Climb8 change is heavily censored
) Yes, I'm certainly having trouble calling Plimer an idiot.
Too much truth Ian
Love it..!
right on speaking the truth
Total CO2 in our atmosphere = 0.04%
Man-made CO2 = 3% of the above 0.04%
3% of 0.04% = 0.0012%
Thus total global man-made CO2 in our atmosphere = 0.0012%
Mathematically, 0.0012% = *ZERO!!!*
It's now 0.043%
Man-made CO2 = 50% of the above not 3%
Ozone is 0.00006%
Try removing it and see if we last the week.
@@grumnut1854
_It's now 0.043%_ ... Big deal. Concentrations of CO2 in the atmosphere were as high as 0.4% (4,000 ppm) during the Cambrian period - that's TEN TIMES what they are today - and the planet didn't boil, in fact vegetation and life thrived! Guess what?... that's why farmers actually pump CO2 into their industrial greenhouses!
_Man-made CO2 = 50% of the above not 3%_ ... Err, "DON'T BE RIDICULOUS!"
_Ozone is 0.00006%_ ... And???
_Try removing it and see if we last the week._ ... If you're talking about removing Ozone and thus damaging the Ozone layer, err, how is an increase in CO2 going to do that??? Perhaps you're confusing carbon dioxide with chlorine monoxide or chlorofluorocarbons?! 🙄
BUT... even if your absurd 50% man-made figure was to be correct, total (all countries combined) man-made atmospheric CO2 would still only be 0.21%, which is still close to ZERO!
Better luck next time 😂
@@MarekzAnglii )"Concentrations of CO2 in the atmosphere were as high as 0.4% (4,000 ppm) during the Cambrian period - that's TEN TIMES what they are today - and the planet didn't boil, in fact vegetation and life thrived!"
Yes when CO2 was 4000ppm the Sun was 5% weaker. In fact most of the Earth was barren at that time.
"that's why farmers actually pump CO2 into their industrial greenhouses!" Yes...greenhouses, not open fields where you can't control nutrients. Search "Simon Clark more food" as to why crops such as wheat and rice are being badly affected.
"Ozone is 0.00006% ... And???" I think you were saying that 0.04% is not that much. In fact it's 97 billion molecules of CO2 per cubic inch. If we could see at 15 microns, we could see about a meter.
"BUT... even if your absurd 50% man-made figure was to be correct, total (all countries combined) man-made atmospheric CO2 would still only be 0.21%, which is still close to ZERO! "
No man-made atmospheric CO2 would be 50% also. Think about it for a second It's gone from 280ppm, where it has stayed for the last 11,000 years to 423ppm in 150 years. ALL of that increase is due to us. We know due to the isotopic ratios of the carbon in the CO2.
When your paycheck depends on arriving at a certain conclusion, you are going to whatever it takes to get to that conclusion.
That's right. Like the 220 climate scientists from the CSIRO that were repeatedly warned then sacked for stating that global warming was true.
I agree ‼️A total CON‼️🙈
I always say no matter what - Follow the Money - it is Always About The Money
these people don't know how to speak the truth........
Greens tell lies.
Australias peak scientific body, the CSIRO, hasn't been able to provide any evidence that CO2 is driving catastrophic climate change.
If the climate is NOT changing, I'd be worried.
Then I'd know it's being manipulated.
It is, maybe find out the truth
Too true!
This guys spot on! Micheal Moore documentary tells the truth an that was made a while ago!
The truth will out...!
If climate change is not caused by humans what is causing it? Yes, I know that the climate has always changed. But it needs a cause to make change.
Scientists know, when, how and why the climate has changed going back 100’s of million’s of years. The causes include change of the earth’s axis, the axis wobbling, changes in the earth’s orbit, solar output, changes in the percentages of O2 or CO2 in the atmosphere, movement of the continents, change in ocean currents, volcanic out put and the earths albedo.
My question is what is causing the present climate change?
I live in Florida 3 miles from the Gulf of Mexico, in my part of the world we take climate change as seriously as a heart attack at 3:00 AM
Lots of triggered people
Just switch off from media and live your normal life without it and you may notice there is no problems what's so ever
@@mig0000001
You are incredibly naive
@@nickyl9040 are you trying to gaslighte me?
Mate you're narcissist
@@chrisgould101 Now. now. That's pretty rich coming from a guy, who yesterday refused to answer my question on the specific cause of our current climate change. Just in case you missed it here it is again.
If climate change is not caused by humans what is causing it? Yes, I know that the climate has always changed. But it needs a cause to make change.
Scientists know, when, how and why the climate has changed going back 100’s of million of years. The causes include change of the earth’s axis, the axis wobbling, changes in the earth’s orbit, solar output, changes in the percentages of O2 or CO2 in the atmosphere, movement of the continents, change in ocean currents, volcanic out put and the earths albedo.
My question is what is causing the present climate change?
If only this interviewer would allow their knowledgeable guests to finish a sentence, then we would know more.
**And on the experimental injections you push!**
experimental how? - all vaccines, certainly UK and US ones have been approved by regulators - therefore , they're only experimental in your fear ravaged delusions Karen
Thanks so much for the video and info
Because of the economic crisis and the rate of unemployment now is the best time to invest and make money 💯
I heard her trading strategies are really good
Yeah
My investment with Expert Angelica cansacio gave me profits of over $24 ,320 Us dollars and ever since then she has been delivering
She has really made a good name for herself
Her success story are everywhere 😱
Yes it’s all about the money, that’s more realistic not climate crisis.
this climate rant is all crap...so cold this summer in nsw....6c in January overnight..
Yep I turned my fan on only 4 days.
Coal powered cars are the way to go man...
Human beings need dragons to fight. If none can be found, we will create our own.
If you're saying humans need or like to fight, I entirely disagree.
People need to be told they are sinners. Remember the previous religion?
I love how sky news only gets on so called experts that agree with them 🤣😂
Some commentators at Sky believe in climate change. There is diversity of opinion, unlike the ABC and other fake news left media.
Maybe these experts tell the truth...
unlike the greens...
who tell lies...
@@coal_man I don't follow the greens, what lies have they said?
Plimer the mining executive.
And of course the ABC does the same.LMAO
We have known that for forty years
Ian Plimer is the director of multiple mining and mineral exploitation companies.
He is the one doing the misleading.
Prove it.
@@colinmeehan791 it's a known fact.
And many global warming proponents are heavily invested in renewable energy. What’s your point?
He is a geoligist there are plenty of his vids for ppl to find calling out the co2 scam if the lazy people do some duck duck go . it's curtains for Greta's scam
I am a scientist and teacher of science, Professor Plimer is absolutely correct in what he says. Fear is what you listen to, since you obviously do not understand the scientific rational of what he is saying..
We're being misled on alot of issues these days.