Euro NCAP Crash Test of Volvo S90/V90
Вставка
- Опубліковано 24 січ 2017
- Euro NCAP Frontal Impact takes place at 64 Km/h, 40% of the width of the car striking a deformable barrier. In the Full Width test, 100% of the width of the car impacts a rigid barrier at 50 Km/h. In the side impact, a mobile deformable barrier impacts the driver's door at 50 km/h. In the pole test, the car tested is propelled sideways at 32 km/h into a rigid pole.
- Авто та транспорт
0:30 the dummy dab cuz they know they're in a volvo
haha perfect ;D good laugh! thank you for pointing it out!!!
ahahaha
loooooooooooooolXD
I know there will be comment like this
true😂
Best total result ever. This is now officially the safest car on earth.
BMAN488877 V40 was the safest before (2012-2013) ;)
You can only directly compare it to 2016 crash test as the tests are completely unchanged from 2016. There is no way to compare V90/S90 to a car tested in 2012 as the point system have changed a lot since then.
BigAngeloSantorini alfa romeo did 97% of score with the new giulia (in alla 3 versions veloce, normal and qv).
BigAngeloSantorini but this volvo have line assist...
Alfa Romeo Giulia got a slightly better score from Adult Occupant Protection and Child Occupant, but lost to Volvo in Pedestrian and Safety Assist. In Safety assist score, the gap to the Alfa is quite big. That is why Volvo is safest car ever although the difference to the Alfa is quite marginal.
The side pole test is probably the most brutal crash test out there next to the small overlap
I love that laminated side window... it's just for more protection.
If you're feeling useless, remember there's a bunch of people crash testing a Volvo.
Just look at side pole test. Volvo is not safe anymore. Tesla Model 3 is safer for ex.
@@kliibapz well that's because the base is full of batteries
@@owo7094 Batteries can't save the car :D They are explosive. Model 3 is saving its batterries and passengers
@@kliibapz yeah since there are batteries the base is way more solid.
Any other fuel cars will pretty much perform the same or slighly better
Electric in the other hand performs better from what I've seen at least
Just look at etron, the base of the car barely bent lmao
@@kliibapz This Volvo is sedan car and Tesla is fucking combi!!Ok Tesla is biggest trash on the world!
00:40 The front grill didn't even crack
These cars are amazing
*DAMNNNNN*
Does Volvo use different side glass? very impressed that it doesn’t spray the interior.
ideal result. i love this.
1:56 rear door holding the load as the body is twisted on the pole. Very impressive results.
Simply the BEST! 👍💓
You must to have trust in the Volvo cars. The people of the Volvo have a very big experience with the saftey.
Costisor Dorin I trust Tesla better than a less safe fossil for fossils made in China.
Rear sheet pretensioner worked well.
did you see the front crash? its an easyest way how to made bmw from vlovo :-D
Shut up and look at a crash test of an BMW or a Audi.
U shut up
Si señor de lo mejor en seguridad sobre todo enel golpe lateras yeba barras de refuerzo en las puertas mui pocos coches las tienen eso salva muchisimaa vidas si señor
the best ! I love it ,it is not easy to buy this safety car
That active hood for pedestrian safety tho.
очень круто
I love these crash test videos, BUT how do we know whos airbag is most comfy to the skin?
I wanna see the AEB tests done on ice, is it able to stop in the same conditions?
From Volvo to Rolls Royce in one second 0:40
Lol
🤣
The pedestrian avoidance system is nothing short of impressive. Volvo's are expensive, but inside you're safe, and if you ever run in front of a car, you better hope it's a Volvo.
I think if you get hit by a car, you better hope it's not a volvo
0:39 - 1:11 - That kid's parents are going to be pissed he crashed the family Volvo. And grateful that he's okay. He was at far less than the recommended 12" from the steering wheel and managed to walk away unhurt. So did his little brother in the back seat.
But now he's grounded for a year. And no more driving till he's 18.
February 18, 2017 2:32 am
Per IIHS it represents both a very small mum and an average 12 year old child:
www.edmunds.com/car-safety/the-female-dummy-no-brains-but-a-real-lifesaver.html
July 3, 2018 9:43 pm
0:56 who drive that close to the steering wheel?
Short people.
5th percentile female as to protocol
Old women
@@volundrfrey896 other replies : 3 years ago,your reply : 3 days ago 😂
@@alifrachmanz Yes, and?
What is that stuff on 2:15? The hood raises to absorb the damage?
Montolide Monteiro yes, active bonnet
0:44 notice the wheels shaking... reminds me of the vibration I feel in my v90 at 120 km per hour
Tyre issue
@Ed I have the same issue in my S90 Rdesign with 20" wheels on both Pirelli and Dunlop tyres, did you found out a solution?
@@Peklenec yes front drive shafts changed and its almost perfect. But first they will check the wheel balance and roundness to make sure its not from the wheels
@@davidck1 I will mention these front shafts in the next annual service check, I got wheels balanced 2 month ago, but I am not sure if I observe any difference, but I found out, it happens only at some kind of highway and always between 120-130 kmh, over 150kmh it is super smooth. Thanks for info.
Volvo basicly Is the benchmark of safety. It Is clear as glass why they where bought by the chinese.
Beyler Alın bir volvo keyfinize bakın çok güven veriyor. Soyguncu sömürücü Türkiye de alabilirsem bu aracı param olduğunda almayı düşünüyorum
Ne yaptın dostum, aldın mı bari?
I noticed that a normal car looks like a banana in side crashes, when I saw a vid on Koenigsegg crash test then the Koenigsegg didnt got affected by the side crash, that means that the chassi didnt bend at all but the side window cracked obviously
1:57 the dummy hit the brakes lol
He did not apply brakes. Every time a car crashes the brake lights and indicators turn on.
What is the side pole crash test rating? I see is 3 star only
Deep side pole!
When Koenigsegg did the side crash with a Koenigsegg regera the car was not bended from the crash with the same speed tested
0:57 - I wonder what it would feel like to take an airbag right to the face? This dummy took an airbag to the face because it was small and had the seat all the way forward. I'm 6' tall (183 cm) so the airbag probably wouldn't even hit me.
February 18, 2017 2:34 am
0:36 the front window is fully intact.i never see that in any car.
new sedan main battle tank lol.
This is the video of the 2009 Chevrolet Cruze ua-cam.com/video/V3eddfbBzWA/v-deo.html, actually the Cruze performed better than this S90, the S90 received 95% while the Cruze received 96%.... Cruze's window was Intact too... And look at the difference in the pole test. The Cruze from 2009 is stronger??
@@akj2387 so you saying chevrolet is more safe than volvo?are you hearing yourself lol.
@@jacklarkson4505 Do you not see the crack at 0:22? Now, comparing these two specific cars, yes... The Chevy Cruze was the first car to get full marks on the front/side tests... Well, Euroncap says it too... The car from 2009 did better, so now lets compare it to a Volvo from a similar era... www.euroncap.com/en/results/volvo/v60-plug-in-hybrid/10954. The 2012 V60 scored 93%... Just watch the video, ua-cam.com/video/q_yuuOp91OA/v-deo.html the Volvo from 2012 had a cracked windshield... Chevy from 2009 didn't... I'm not saying Volvo is unsafe, but it's not really that different from modern cars anymore. Back in the 20th century, Volvo was acing every test because safety wasn't a priority for any cars back then... Times have changed...
Actually the safest car Euroncap ever tested was the Mazda CX30, scoring 99%... Volvo couldn't beat it.
s90 is the best
Someone has to talk with that pedestrian
0:29 the kid dabed
0:58 That looks like a kid size - so close to the steering
почему на 0:32 у машины крыша уже с вмятинами,если она ещё не врезалась,и почему на крыше заклёпки ?
видимо датчики какие-то
Так крепятся камеры для съёмки внутри. Они не влияют на жёсткость кузова т.к. крепятся просто к листу металла, а не к рёбрам жёсткости внутри крыши.
I love Volvo, but the Pole test was terrible! I can't believe how week the car looked during that test. Other than that, superb all around! The pedestrian detection system looks like it has been calibrated fantastically and works just right.
It's not "the look" that maters, but the forces on the dummies' sensors. In fact, car MUST bend and crash and twist in order to absorb the force of the impact. BTW, for a couple of decades VOLVO use SIPS system, which kind of slides seats with the driver or passenger AWAY from the door making room for more crumple zone in a side impact.
Watch these in case you don't know how SIPS works:
watch?v=wA09vM7Zufs
watch?v=L7iKm4epeAQ
watch?v=KlEZSa9NOmQ (the best!)
watch?v=onkNWGfcO8M
A stiff car is a dangerous car.
Я тоже обожаю Volvo. К сожалению, Geely даёт о себе знать. Толщина металла стала меньше.
Actually, this system is much more resistant for bigger speeds than others, cos sips system help provide survival space at almost any surviable speed. Actually no crush has no effect on side impact due your body doesnt have time to decelerate and it still crash to side with crush or without.
Thanks for the interesting videos. After watching them and re-reading the Euroncap report for the new E Class and S90, the S90 performed just as good or better in all areas of adult occupant safety. Eventhough the E Class didn't deform as much as the S90 in the pole test, the S90 was just as safe. Also I trust Volvo and they do make the safest cars in the world, so I really should not be worried about how the car "looked" during the pole test. Volvo knows their stuff and design the car to deform in such a way to protect the occupants.
0:28 bommm
This ain't most safe anymore.
周りを固めて、中の人はどおなる‼️🤔衝撃を、和らげるのが車体です。😊
0:56 - So now I know that a 12 year old can crash a Volvo and be fine.
February 13, 2017 12:16 am
Actually, it's a simulation for a small woman. Somewhere in the past, some crash testing agency, I forget who, said, Hey, we only test for adult male-sized dummies. We should test for adult female-sized dummies too. Guess what? The only cars where the female-sized dummies fared well were Volvos. Of course, every car company had to scramble to catch up with Volvo. Again!
0:30
Is it good ?
Yes, ofcourse it's a Volvo
Hahaha I agree
1:45 This is with 32km/h? How will the car look like with higher speed ?
Maybe the founder of Nokia and Volvo is the same person
tank ammq
Pole test... hmm hmm
volvo testing ncap actually
Tiny dolls
hareketli bariyer çarparken zorlandı amk Volvo'ya :D
E-class is much harder
Damn dummies look small in this car but I think that Tesla model x is safer in adult occupant protection
1:56 Super large intrusion of the pole into the chassis. This car is a death trap.
See how a well designed car handles pole impact:
ua-cam.com/video/cMiZa3HgRVE/v-deo.html
that's awesome for a Chinese company
2:58 wow, indeed, very nice system. Instead of crashing yourself into the barrirer, the car will itself go on the other side of the road to crash into a car...
everyone in the galaxy knows volvo is the safest,just stop destroying these poor cars and give one of them to me.
Tesla is safer! No intrusion and impact from the door panel.
Are you working for Tesla?
Fm Gaming Channel #1 The cars speak for themselves along with the brand popularity. Especially after a Tesla was launched in to space.
ua-cam.com/video/fMcuiFmIQTo/v-deo.html Volvo is much better!
Fm Gaming Channel #1 money.cnn.com/2017/06/13/technology/tesla-model-x-safety-rating/index.html
Nope, Tesla is waaay better and safer.
What about small overlap?
pole test is very bad
Look twice the test was really good
Curtis Whyte right. Elon Musk likes to laud his car about how strong it is in the pole test compared to Volvo, but stiffer bodies simply means the impact energy transfers right through to the occupants.
Collapsible center console assembly. Genius.
LOL
Sooo bad. Just look at side pole test. Poor Volvo.
Pole test ;Tesla very good
Pole test very baaadddd!!!
This overhyped car is soft like a chewing gum. Look at the impact during the pole test. The new E-class is way better in all tests....
A jal car is a safe car.It's a safe car if it's only a crumple zone.I don't know what you're looking for, but I don't think Mercedes is going to have a high pitch.
Yes, a car that doesn't crumple in the crumple zones is NOT a safe car.
Well, either the car crumbles like a chewing gum and you stay stafe. Or, the car stays fine and you crumble like a chewing gum. Your choice, I know what I would opt for.
Come on, guys. We are especially talking about the side impact. A crumple zone in the driver´s door is a joke, or?
The E-Class is safer than the Volvo by a little margin on impacts. Volvo always was overrated because ppl spread it as being the safer. I think Merc for ex. always had safer cars.
the side impact is rubbish compared to Tesla model 3
0:30