weirdest part of this whole question is that they asked the *first* person in line as in the guy already at the ordering window. thats nuts!!! ask the guy in second!
O but then LIKE. If i go to buy a burrito but then im like. Im gonna buy one more burrito for later - am i cutting in line? NO. If i change my mind do get a more complicated order that's gonna take longer, am i taking someone's spot in line? And what if i go with the intent to buy a certain amount?
If you do that people aren't going to like the fact that it happened, but they won't get mad because those are reasonable circumstances to increase your order; as is ordering for a friend or family. The situation described in the question is essentially cutting into the front of the line by nesting your order in someone else's. It's not like when someone in line *happens* to be your friend or you *happen* to want to buy more; pretty much anyone will be incentivized to take the money to add to their order - there's nothing to stop someone from doing this all the time aside from how much money they have and how principled the person at the front of the line is. Travis even jokingly illustrated that you can take this to an extreme where you essentially have a *virtual* line contained in one person's order if a bunch of people have that same idea. At the point where order nesting becomes an standard and not an occasional exception, we then start lose the basic structure of a line. And since there is no sympathetic circumstance of family/friendship/impulse purchasing - I think people are understandably going to get pissed off. It's on the border of whether I would say it's outright ethically wrong but I definitely think it's a dick move.
I will never not laugh at the way Justin said "at a GAMING convention"
This is like if Infinity Train was about food and not trauma
I mean this train does seem pretty traumatizing to be fair but yes I agree
Actually, all apocalyptic scenarios start as food train and descend from there.
weirdest part of this whole question is that they asked the *first* person in line as in the guy already at the ordering window. thats nuts!!! ask the guy in second!
SnackPiercer®: "Have it railway!"©
FUCK that's funny
I had a feeling it was food train but I wasn’t sure
we really are hanging on by a thread huh
sexy burger train...........
they just described the in and out food truck
11:41 is the most sibling moment ever
_(in unison):_ "I DONT UNDERSTAND"
Anyone else think of the old soul train... but burgers?
i don't hate the idea of an actual food train
When the Ruffalo Bots militarize do they turn into Hulk robots?
O but then LIKE. If i go to buy a burrito but then im like. Im gonna buy one more burrito for later - am i cutting in line? NO. If i change my mind do get a more complicated order that's gonna take longer, am i taking someone's spot in line? And what if i go with the intent to buy a certain amount?
If you do that people aren't going to like the fact that it happened, but they won't get mad because those are reasonable circumstances to increase your order; as is ordering for a friend or family.
The situation described in the question is essentially cutting into the front of the line by nesting your order in someone else's. It's not like when someone in line *happens* to be your friend or you *happen* to want to buy more; pretty much anyone will be incentivized to take the money to add to their order - there's nothing to stop someone from doing this all the time aside from how much money they have and how principled the person at the front of the line is. Travis even jokingly illustrated that you can take this to an extreme where you essentially have a *virtual* line contained in one person's order if a bunch of people have that same idea. At the point where order nesting becomes an standard and not an occasional exception, we then start lose the basic structure of a line.
And since there is no sympathetic circumstance of family/friendship/impulse purchasing - I think people are understandably going to get pissed off. It's on the border of whether I would say it's outright ethically wrong but I definitely think it's a dick move.
Ever take requests?
The fact that the “food antiquing” idea is morally superior to what the question asker did is a testament to how utterly monstrous this behavior is.
Travis is so wrong on this one