F-82 Twin Mustang in a Nutshell: a Record-Setting Aircraft

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 5 жов 2024
  • We've had one P-51 Mustang, yes, but what about DOUBLE P-51 Mustang? That's right, the North American F-82 (P-82) Twin Mustang was a thing. It wasn't quite as simple as gluing two P-51s together, but that's what it will be in our hearts. It also happens to hold the record for the longest non-stop flight performed by a propeller-driven fighter.
    Study history. It's fun.
    ~Social~
    Twitter: / ruibosstheonly
    Facebook: / ruibosstheonly
    Instagram: / ruibosstheonly
    Email: ruiboss314@gmail.com
    ~WW2 Books I've Enjoyed (Affiliate Links)~
    The Second World Wars: amzn.to/47wYPQa
    Operation Neptune: amzn.to/47uZYaB
    Nimitz at War: amzn.to/3ZsqAr6
    ~My Studio Gear (Affiliate Links)~
    Camera: amzn.to/3Ww4out
    Mic: amzn.to/4dreJxZ
    Camera/Mic Desk Mount: amzn.to/44sjvHv
    Acoustic Foam: amzn.to/3UPhMso
    Acoustic Foam Wedges: amzn.to/3UyDEXA
    Neon Tea Light: amzn.to/3UyEHH4
    Lightbulb Prop: amzn.to/4bpilOZ
    Color Light 1: amzn.to/3WzArd1
    Color Light 2: amzn.to/3weDgWp
    ~Attribution~
    Music and sound from Epidemic Sound.
    Images/Footage from:
    -Wikimedia Commons
    -Public Domain
    -Canva
    -Fair Use
    Thanks to www.worldwarph... for being an excellent WW2 photo resource!
    #planes #fighters #twinfuselage #ww2 #worldwar2 #unitedstates #worldwarii #worldwartwo #history #aircraft

КОМЕНТАРІ • 19

  • @John-wx9oy
    @John-wx9oy 21 день тому +6

    Hawaii to New York sitting in that little cockpit. Oof.

  • @theadventuresofjavier8698
    @theadventuresofjavier8698 29 днів тому +3

    The Germans did the same thing (kinda) when they made the HE-111z
    Twin mustang was a brute
    I built a model of this aircraft 25 years ago. It’s still in my collection

  • @Imnotyourdoormat
    @Imnotyourdoormat 25 днів тому +7

    *_The P-82 "Twin Mustang" used 6 parts from the P-51. Thats it. Other than that it was a completely different Aircraft._*

    • @John-k6f9k
      @John-k6f9k 7 днів тому +1

      Ooooooooooh, you're so knowledgeable! Let's all bow down before the knowledgeable person and his withering but justified scorn, because he knows his subject, and you don't.

  • @jokekopter2509
    @jokekopter2509 29 днів тому +2

    Fun fact,italians did the same,just whit the there fighters

  • @USApatriotLarry
    @USApatriotLarry 26 днів тому +2

    As personally related to me by WW2 triple ace and post war test pilot, Colonel Bud Anderson, He LOVED his P-51 but he hated the P-82/F-82. The ultra long range F-82 was replaced by the F-86 which had maybe 20% of the range. Must be a reason not covered by your thin coverage.

    • @RuiBossTheOnly
      @RuiBossTheOnly  26 днів тому

      Sorry if you find the coverage thin: I do these "Nutshell" videos just to give a quick, basic overview of a given topic. I did mention the F-86 replacing the F-82 towards the end of the video. Interesting though that Colonel Anderson didn't take a liking to the F-82.

    • @zerstorer335
      @zerstorer335 20 днів тому

      Part of it is that the F-82 was built to meet requirements that weren't as relevant, anymore. That requirement to handle very long-range missions that would have been necessary if the Allies invaded Japan wasn't as relevant in the postwar landscape. And, where some aspects of those requirements were still relevant, the missions could be flown by aircraft that had better performance.
      The F-82 was sent to the Pacific as a stopgap to cover some requirements (like all-weather interception) until the needs in other areas were met and the Pacific theater could start getting the new designs. When North Korea attacked, the F-82s were what was there. So, they fought until enough new aircraft could be sent.

    • @ekspatriat
      @ekspatriat 9 днів тому

      Bet you get asked (told) to leave parties.

  • @davidmurphy8190
    @davidmurphy8190 21 день тому +1

    At 2:46, there is a F-82 with a pylon-mounted store on the starboard wing. Look at it carefully. This weapon appears to be a IR-guided or possibly TV-guided missile. The missile airframe ,looks like a modified BULLPUP or similar design. Kind of fascinating….

    • @brrrtbacheniraq873
      @brrrtbacheniraq873 19 днів тому +1

      It was a research pod for tests at Wright Patterson after the war.

    • @davidmurphy8190
      @davidmurphy8190 19 днів тому +1

      @@brrrtbacheniraq873 The pod appears to be a derivative of the AIM-26 Super Falcon, but fitted with an electro optical seeker head probably infrared. The date or time frame of the image might be helpful. The years before, during, and after the Vietnam War saw a large number of precision-guided munition or targeting pod projects.

    • @brrrtbacheniraq873
      @brrrtbacheniraq873 18 днів тому

      @@davidmurphy8190 Waaaay earlier. It was around 1949. I’ll see if I cn find the answer.

    • @zoperxplex
      @zoperxplex 15 днів тому

      Looks like a ramjet.

  • @lawrencelewis2592
    @lawrencelewis2592 25 днів тому +1

    If two is good, wouldn't three be better? It would be, what, an F-153?

    • @RuiBossTheOnly
      @RuiBossTheOnly  25 днів тому +1

      Haha, why have double plane when you can have triple?

    • @Oldguy-k3t
      @Oldguy-k3t 21 день тому +1

      ​@@RuiBossTheOnly Why not four?