How a P-51 Mustang Works

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 28 кві 2024
  • Take an in-depth look inside a North American P-51D fighter plane from the World War II era.
    PATREON
    Help me keep making videos:
    / animagraffs
    MUSIC
    I composed the background music especially for this video! Hear "Mustang Running" on my SoundCloud:
    / mustang-running
    PRIVATE WORK
    Need 3D illustration and animation? Let's chat:
    animagraffs.com/contact/
    LICENSE Animagraffs' work for your own purposes
    animagraffs.com/licensing/
    WEBSITE
    See more explanations of how things work:
    animagraffs.com/
    SOFTWARE USED
    I use Blender 3D to create these models. It's free and open source, and the community is amazing:
    www.blender.org/
    Chapters:
    0:00 Intro
    0:34 Frame
    1:54 Landing gear
    2:36 Rear landing gear
    3:24 Engine
    5:23 Fuel
    6:07 Propeller
    6:55 Armaments
    8:18 Cockpit
    16:14 Gunsight
    17:08 Pilot
    Correction:
    0:10 Before commenting, check the top pinned "VIDEO CORRECTIONS" thread, as your correction or criticism has likely already been mentioned many times.
  • Наука та технологія

КОМЕНТАРІ • 4,1 тис.

  • @animagraffs
    @animagraffs  2 роки тому +1427

    VIDEO CORRECTIONS (compiled from viewer comments):
    From Jason Majors:
    2:25 The rudder pedals don't activate the brakes. There is a separate axis on each pedal to activate the brake on that side.
    12:03 The two landing gear lights are not left and right. There's a green one to indicate gear down and a red one to indicate gear in transit. Off indicates gear up. Both lights also have a test mode.
    12:10 The guns activation switch is to the left of the rocket knob. It enables the guns to fire and/or turns on the gun sight (which has further controls to the left of the sight near the compass).
    12:19 The knob that you said activated the gun and selected between semi-auto and automatic actually control the rockets. The guns have no semi-auto or burst mode. They are full auto whenever activated.
    12:26 The knob below that does not set the number of rounds to fire in a burst, it sets which specific rocket to fire in single fire mode. It auto advances after firing.
    14:09 The manifold pressure indicator should not be green all the way up to 60 inHg, only to 36. Running it higher than that for sustained periods will cause the engine to seize.
    14:39 You skipped the climb rate indicator below the artificial horizon. It indicates the climb (or descent) in 1000 feet per minute. You skipped the G force gauge to the right of the climb indicator. It shows the current G load on the aircraft and has two memory indicators for min and max values.
    14:54 There are not separate left and right gun heaters. There's one gun heater for all six guns, and one pilot heater. The label in the video was correct, but the narration was not.
    From David Franklin:
    2:45 The animation of tailwheel and rudder steering 180 degrees out of sync and they are connect to the rudder pedals in the cockpit. This is the primary method of steering while taxiing. Differential braking is rarely used except for very tight turns on the ramp where one brake is locked and the same rudder pedal is pushed essentially allowing the airplane to yaw around the locked wheel.

    • @gabrielnascimento1021
      @gabrielnascimento1021 2 роки тому +44

      Hey great video, I'd like to see how a refrigerator works

    • @antoniodelrio1292
      @antoniodelrio1292 2 роки тому +158

      Thank you for posting the corrections. Shows you're not just after clicks. You after doing a good job.

    • @sumerrana6805
      @sumerrana6805 2 роки тому +20

      can we have an Insight of these videos are made?

    • @sawomirmiszczak134
      @sawomirmiszczak134 2 роки тому +36

      Another correction, V-1650-7 can output something like 1700hp at 67" MAP at Low blower crit alt, and take off power is 1490 at 61" MAP.
      This engine was equipped with 2 stage 2 speed, liquid cooled supercharger so animation do not match real engine, between supercharger and engine intake was aftercooler which is missing too :)

    • @feez357
      @feez357 2 роки тому +73

      At least we know that Animagraffs isn't twisting the truth to push an agenda like almost everything else you see on youtube. The animation is cool and the dialog is fast paced and he owns up to the errors.

  • @jonathanolsen7254
    @jonathanolsen7254 2 роки тому +725

    Man did you do your homework... My Father was in WW2 and somehow, he ended up with a P-51 motor, Dad passed away about 6 years ago and I have his motor and prop set, I build a motor stand for the both of them and what a sight it is looking at them, when this motor is running the sound is unreal and I am so glad that I now am the caretaker of this small slice of history...

    • @brianmuhlingBUM
      @brianmuhlingBUM 2 роки тому +17

      I would love to hear it run. VROOOM!

    • @mikaelskarp1422
      @mikaelskarp1422 2 роки тому +6

      @@brianmuhlingBUM same

    • @HabuBeemer
      @HabuBeemer 2 роки тому +30

      Those Merlin or Allison engines today are worth close to $1Million. Don't lose it if it's in running condition. The prop is thousands of dollars if it can be made airworthy.

    • @dmytroskyba5582
      @dmytroskyba5582 2 роки тому +13

      Осталось купить планер ,поставить в него двигатель и научиться летать как папа )))

    • @junocrusader5860
      @junocrusader5860 2 роки тому +3

      Wow!

  • @xb70valkyriech
    @xb70valkyriech 2 роки тому +1202

    Absolutely excellent. Many of those details, especially the cockpit controls and instruments, are something that is crucial to the aircraft that is often skipped. Kudos for going into such intricate detail.

    • @bruceleithead475
      @bruceleithead475 2 роки тому +6

      The description of the manifold pressure gauge and RPM gauge could have better been expressed as propeller RPM and Engine Power as Manifold Pressure using a constant speed prop.
      A fixed blade prop needs only RPM INDICATOR such as found on small light planes.

    • @jamesmc81
      @jamesmc81 2 роки тому +13

      The controls also seem incredibly intricate for it's days. This aircraft must have been like something from science fiction for the people of the time.

    • @lakshyamongia602
      @lakshyamongia602 2 роки тому +9

      @@jamesmc81 military stuff always looks like science fiction when we look back. We have no idea what they are hiding right now and will probably won't until next the 20 years.

    • @rajeshnarayanaswamy5773
      @rajeshnarayanaswamy5773 2 роки тому +6

      Can't even believe this plane was built in 1943,80 years ago....most of the airplane technology was already in place in 2nd world war...amazing way of explaining an beautiful P51..God bless you for sharing the video

    • @rajeshnarayanaswamy5773
      @rajeshnarayanaswamy5773 2 роки тому +4

      Can't even believe this plane was built in 1943,80 years ago....most of the airplane technology was already in place in 2nd world war...amazing way of explaining an beautiful P51..God bless you for sharing the video

  • @Insert-name-here00
    @Insert-name-here00 8 місяців тому +77

    Wonderful presentation!
    My uncle (Bill Leslie) and childhood idol flew many aircraft in WW2 but he always said the P-51 D was his favorite. Apparently I was the only person in the entire family he ever told any war stories to including the time he got shot down, a pot shot got his radiator but he managed to get back over the channel before his engine seized. He told me how he flew in support of the ground troops so it wasn’t until I was an adult that I understood why he didn’t talk much about his war time experiences. He once told me in detail how he destroyed a truck convoy and literally blew Trucks, equipment and German soldiers away, including the ones trying to fight back against his six .50 cal’s. The look in his eyes I still remember, a far away look that started as pure concentration and excitement then a touch of sadness. I knew for a second he was back in that airplane in the excitement of combat. This was when I was probably 10 or 12 so about 1987. Dad told me that was the first time he had ever told any story about the war to anyone in the family. Bill was an extraordinary man and is missed by all who had the privilege of knowing him.

    • @animagraffs
      @animagraffs  8 місяців тому +7

      Incredible, thank you for sharing these memories and your history.

    • @zottek2
      @zottek2 Місяць тому

      My aunt knew your uncle (Bill Leslie) very well. She didn't like him at all, but this is not the place to give her reasons for that.

    • @robhersey1796
      @robhersey1796 3 дні тому

      @@zottek2 cool story bro

  • @LFPAnimations
    @LFPAnimations Рік тому +148

    It is insane how many different systems these planes had considering how many had to be mass produced. The American industrial might during WW2 was incredible.

    • @tdiflyfish9267
      @tdiflyfish9267 5 місяців тому +6

      The Axis powers had zero clues on the U.S. Military’s capacity to building large numbers of the numerous ships (from subs, carriers, battleships, transports, destroyers, etc.); planes (fighters & bombers); all types of weapons from heavy to light machine guns; jeeps, transport trucks along with the associated bombs from aircraft’s to their ships & bomber’s along with their aircraft’s shooting a .50 caliber’s that makes a VERY LARGE HOLE IN ANYTHING IT HITS!! The Axis’s were still using horses to transport their equipments in that way.
      The U.S. Population was still EXTREMELY UPSET OVER THE “SURPRISE ATTACK” at Pearl Harbor (even though the Enigma code was decoded by British Intelligence) that was forwarded to the White House.
      Watch the historically correct movie, “The Imitation Game”…….
      T

    • @krzysztofmatuszek
      @krzysztofmatuszek 5 місяців тому +6

      It is a very American-centric point of view. Do you seriously think that Soviet or British, and especially German airplanes of the era didn't have similar equipment on board? Well, they totally did.

    • @LFPAnimations
      @LFPAnimations 5 місяців тому +4

      @@krzysztofmatuszek the USA outproduced all of those countries and supplied the soviets and british with lend lease to supply them. So they may have had more advanced fighters, but the americans had the industrial scale.

    • @krzysztofmatuszek
      @krzysztofmatuszek 5 місяців тому +2

      @@LFPAnimations Up to 1944, Germans were producing planes at roughly the same scale as Americans. I get what you want to convey with your American-centric point of view but bear in mind that Britain, Soviet Union and Germany alike have had warzone on their territory. It's less of a challenge to keep the industry running if your soil is safe and sound.

    • @LFPAnimations
      @LFPAnimations 5 місяців тому +10

      @@krzysztofmatuszek by the end of the war the americans produced over 300,000 planes. That is more than any other country during the war. My point of view isn’t ‘american-centric’, it is factual. It is undeniable that American industrial capacity won the war.

  • @JaredOwen
    @JaredOwen 2 роки тому +1659

    Well done! I'm impressed with the amount of detail. Looking forward to more animations on your channel

    • @Shotgun93Alexander
      @Shotgun93Alexander 2 роки тому +54

      Damn even another animation legend commented on this masterpiece

    • @nepalihacker5496
      @nepalihacker5496 2 роки тому +6

      Iam your subscriber

    • @TheFunkhouser
      @TheFunkhouser 2 роки тому +6

      Same! Can you do the Mk 1 Spitfire???

    • @Neks0ns
      @Neks0ns 2 роки тому +4

      Love your work jared! and i just discovered this channel, immediately subbed, hoping to see more of these great contents!

    • @veereshyatham1091
      @veereshyatham1091 2 роки тому +3

      I subbed to you Jared Owen i see your videos daily cause I'm new i i am so interested

  • @uawldct
    @uawldct 2 роки тому +237

    Whoa...I'm in the graphics industry and I can't imagine the time put into this video let alone the research. Well done.

    • @lakshyamongia602
      @lakshyamongia602 2 роки тому +11

      The only experience I have with graphics is ms paint and even I can't imagine the effort and time that went into this let alone the research details.

    • @LogMeInGoddamnit
      @LogMeInGoddamnit 2 роки тому +13

      It's television quality. Whoever's behind this has a lot of talent and dedication and it's top notch for UA-cam.

    • @fightsportnews4329
      @fightsportnews4329 2 роки тому

      ua-cam.com/users/shorts0f4CKXcCUTY?feature=share

    • @fightsportnews4329
      @fightsportnews4329 2 роки тому

      @@lakshyamongia602 ua-cam.com/users/shorts0f4CKXcCUTY?feature=share

    • @fightsportnews4329
      @fightsportnews4329 2 роки тому

      @@LogMeInGoddamnit ua-cam.com/users/shorts0f4CKXcCUTY?feature=share

  • @shredead
    @shredead Рік тому +52

    I had idea how incredibly sophisticated these machines were. Major appreciation for all of the pilots who needed to be intimately familiar with these instruments. Great content, thank you!

  • @sanjivjhangiani3243
    @sanjivjhangiani3243 Рік тому +33

    This aircraft is stunningly advanced! The gunsight systems, in particular, seemed like something out of a video game.

    • @fishstick45
      @fishstick45 Рік тому +6

      The video games had to get inspiration from somewhere

  • @rzerobzero
    @rzerobzero Рік тому +303

    I watched this on and off over a 10 hour day of working where I have downtime while processes, reports, or scripts are running. I am an instrument rated multi engine pilot with a commercial license, but I work in IT full time. Your aviation related descriptions and explainations were excellent. I never heard someone so clearly explain a constatnt speed propeller before with the car's automatic transmission example. Most of all, the details, just put me there. I imagined being a P-51 pilot. A ground crew member responsible for the oxygen. A dogfight. A safe landing after a mission. You triggered a days worth of fantasy and empathy for what it may have been like for a young pilot/ground crew during WW2. Thank you. Liked, Subscribed.

    • @stardusterservices108
      @stardusterservices108 Рік тому +2

      I 100% concur with your review Robo86. I grew up immersed in aviation, building scores of aircraft models, many of Mustangs, including Monogram's see-through one. (I've been VERY fortunate to get 3 rides in P-51 Mustangs over the course of my life) so yes, Kudos to Animagraffs~ this video is super-excellent, and should be nominated for an award! 👍👍

    • @Vote_Blue
      @Vote_Blue Рік тому +1

      it'd be cool if someone started reproducing old fighter air frames. i'd learn to fly if i could have a p-40.

    • @sergeigarbar1896
      @sergeigarbar1896 Рік тому

      Hello! how did u change to IT?

    • @rzerobzero
      @rzerobzero Рік тому +1

      @@sergeigarbar1896 Always have been IT guy. Aviation has always been an interest so I got my pilots license when I could afford it.

    • @Joe-xo4yg
      @Joe-xo4yg Рік тому

      @@rzerobzero
      Put me in the mood to rewatch Dunkirk 😊
      This channel is awesome
      This is just the second vid I’ve watched
      1st … HMS Victory, afterwards I had to rewatch Master & Commander: Far side of the world
      😂
      Cheers 🖖

  • @josephiousbrosif
    @josephiousbrosif 2 роки тому +193

    I never knew the cockpit and electronics were that advanced. That's very impressive for 40's technology!

    • @motionbasti
      @motionbasti 2 роки тому +46

      you would be amazed at the technology that was already installed in fighter jets in the 70s. military technology is always very far ahead.

    • @D20000
      @D20000 2 роки тому +9

      @@motionbasti Yeah right? When you play simulators like DCS you are always amazed at how they could do all that calculating back then. When you're playing WW2 aircrafts only and you are in this beauty... you are miles ahead of the rest with that gun sight calculating lead and stuff, just amazing!

    • @motionbasti
      @motionbasti 2 роки тому +5

      @@D20000 oh yeah, DCS is such a nice gift. :)

    • @GDBROWN
      @GDBROWN 2 роки тому +15

      Shows you just how much is left out of our history teachings… I believe that is intentional. Even some 4th gen jets did not have a rear facing RaDAR. I had no idea our mustangs of the Second World War did. Amazing

    • @D20000
      @D20000 2 роки тому +4

      @@GDBROWN I got 0.00 history lessons in high school about tools of war. I only got really curious to learn about history after school, TBH. I got curious to learn about stuff in general...only after school. The internet is a wonderful thing, just like this bird is. I'm in love with it on DCS world right now trying to master flying and learning about how to not ruin an engine, dogfight with that sight and those 6 50. Amazingly powerful just two bursts and the plane in front of you is down, then you step into the spitfire which is more agile but seems to shoot with peas.

  • @ThisHandleFeatureIsStupid
    @ThisHandleFeatureIsStupid Рік тому +122

    Despite the amazing overall design, the thing that impresses me the most are the gun sights.
    It's fascinating that they were able to track and adjust for so many variables using such relatively basic tech.
    Great video!

    • @PauloPereira-jj4jv
      @PauloPereira-jj4jv Рік тому +1

      They were not perfect.

    • @BitBuhkit
      @BitBuhkit Рік тому +10

      @@PauloPereira-jj4jv most things are not...

    • @FlimFlammer-bk8dp
      @FlimFlammer-bk8dp Рік тому +1

      Very crude compared to German and British

    • @BoxStudioExecutive
      @BoxStudioExecutive Рік тому +2

      It's just basic trigonometry. The ancient Greeks would have understood the principle and been able to build a similar contraption.

    • @johnabbott257
      @johnabbott257 11 місяців тому +9

      @@PauloPereira-jj4jv Neither are you, but the Mustang was a winner. That's the difference.

  • @ContantContact
    @ContantContact Рік тому +11

    My father, now deceased, was a mechanic on the P51, P38, B17, B25, and others. I wish he were here to see this and comment.
    I do have some or all of his books, manuals, etc on his work in my library.
    I did get him to an airport where a B25 was flown in for rides and to show. He loved it, but was too weak to go into the plane.

  • @sfdanceron1
    @sfdanceron1 2 роки тому +347

    Much respect for the engineers who designed this aircraft.

    • @geirsakariassen4728
      @geirsakariassen4728 2 роки тому +5

      i beliv this was the best f-plane in ww2, mius like gas 500 gal

    • @sfdanceron1
      @sfdanceron1 2 роки тому +6

      @@geirsakariassen4728 It's still a beauty.

    • @rconger384
      @rconger384 2 роки тому +20

      4:30. Leland Atwood was the engineer that figured out how to apply the Meredeth Effect to the P51. One of the most effective applications of the effect in history.

    • @E_Rico
      @E_Rico 2 роки тому +2

      @@rconger384 how does it exactly work? Is it because the hot air creates an area of low pressure, which air will flow into faster to equalise the pressure?

    • @elultimo102
      @elultimo102 2 роки тому +4

      The same could be said of the designers of the Saturn V moon rockets. Many undocumented modifications were made to perfect it, but most all the engineers are not around to consult. Some of the few remaining boosters are being disassembled by the current aerospace engineers, to determine the changes they made. (Engineers have been smart guys for many generations, and we can still learn from them).

  • @19indecisive19
    @19indecisive19 8 місяців тому +4

    Damn, you're videos complete blow my mind. Such attention to detail. Everything is explained. One of the best UA-cam channels I've ever come across.

  • @EPhotoAlbum
    @EPhotoAlbum 5 місяців тому +3

    Not only your knowledge is amazing.... but your animation skills are top notch.

  • @versiable8041
    @versiable8041 2 роки тому +86

    The most Detailed explanation of how a P-51 Mustang works! great job mate!

  • @FoundAndExplained
    @FoundAndExplained 2 роки тому +319

    I seriously cannot believe the detail, the effort, the 3d and the love you put into this video. You are going to the moon!

    • @baltichammer6162
      @baltichammer6162 2 роки тому +1

      You should a P51 with all the engine cowlings removed. That's when it was driven home just how incredibly complex this aircraft was. Amazing tech even today much less in 1943.

    • @e.sstudios1015
      @e.sstudios1015 2 роки тому +2

      Hello FAE!

    • @b43xoit
      @b43xoit 2 роки тому

      Apollo is a different design.

    • @e.sstudios1015
      @e.sstudios1015 2 роки тому

      @Pepe Noir Why so toxic and mad about it? Go spit to the creator directly despite his efforts, I bet you can't even render such model... or am I judging your capabilities without knowing you? Who am I to judge you, but most importantly who are you to blub and talk s h i t on such effort?

    • @samburkes7552
      @samburkes7552 2 роки тому +1

      @@baltichammer6162 We can humbly thsnk the mavens @ North American Aircraft way back when, for one of the best aircraft produced for the War efforts!

  • @balkibartokomouz
    @balkibartokomouz 7 місяців тому +1

    Most excellent. Animagraffs are choice. Great stuff. Subscribed. 😎

  • @user-bi3fd6fj4h
    @user-bi3fd6fj4h 3 місяці тому +2

    Excellent tutorial on the Legendary North American P51D Mustang!. These animations are literally the best ones on UA-cam. Absolutely incredible.

  • @seannotconnery8191
    @seannotconnery8191 2 роки тому +59

    My Grandad flew these during his service in the USAF. Loved going to airshows and museums with him and he always had the most inspiring smile whenever he saw the Mustang.
    God bless!

    • @josephlanderos3225
      @josephlanderos3225 2 роки тому

      you mean the us army air corps. air force started up in 1947.

    • @robertmiller2720
      @robertmiller2720 2 роки тому

      @@josephlanderos3225 They were still in service after 1947.

  • @Harut.V
    @Harut.V 2 роки тому +140

    Amazing video. It’s surprising how advanced the technology of the cockpit was, especially the targeting system. I thought it was just point and shoot through the glass lol

    • @SheriffsSimShack
      @SheriffsSimShack 2 роки тому +11

      For a long time it was. Not every Mustang was eqipped with a Gyro gunsight. Many were still equipped with a stationary reflex sight.

    • @dannyo3317
      @dannyo3317 2 роки тому +1

      @@SheriffsSimShack : Did this vary even within the D Models?

    • @BlueBaron3339
      @BlueBaron3339 2 роки тому +8

      Many gunsights of the period had something similar though not as sophisticated - a second, heavier layer of glass that moved in relation to the forces placed on the aircraft during maneuvering. This would alter the projected targeting image to help pilots compute lead. It was often called the Pepper or Pipper, after a Victorian era stage illusion developed by John Henry Pepper, known as Pepper's Ghost.

    • @SheriffsSimShack
      @SheriffsSimShack 2 роки тому

      @@dannyo3317 yes very much.

    • @jellylightningii5959
      @jellylightningii5959 2 роки тому

      @@dannyo3317 depends i guess

  • @04mach1speed
    @04mach1speed Рік тому +7

    These animations are literally the best ones on UA-cam. Absolutely incredible

  • @jimreilly917
    @jimreilly917 Рік тому +2

    EXCELLENT presentation of one of the best fighters of WWII and one of the best prop planes of the 20th century.

  • @fredsalfa
    @fredsalfa 2 роки тому +27

    That was incredible. My dad was a P51D fighter pilot in WW2 and would have known a lot of the details you mentioned.

  • @iridescentsquids
    @iridescentsquids 2 роки тому +16

    Extraordinarily impressive. Feels like the old static “how it’s made” or “how it works” illustrations that I loved as a kid. Great tone, audio, detail-level, pacing, use of color and transparency.

  • @lnguyen4982
    @lnguyen4982 5 місяців тому +4

    Jet fighters are powerful and all, but you can't deny the raw strength & beauty of these old-fashioned WW2 war planes, and can't help but admire the amazing engineering of these formidable machines. Great video!

  • @skywardmedia7529
    @skywardmedia7529 7 місяців тому +2

    Awesome job! Just a couple of additional corrections:
    At 9:10, the rudder trim and aileron trib knobs are each labeled with the arrows pointing the wrong way.
    At 13:45, this indicator is actually called the Turn & Bank indicator, and it does not display the plane's attitude, but rather the rate of turn, and whether the turn is coordinated (using enough or too much rudder.)

  • @pasantehen
    @pasantehen 2 роки тому +11

    Woooow!!! The creator of this video deserves an Oscar. "Best documentary" thanks for sharing it with us, friend.

  • @smaanuel
    @smaanuel 2 роки тому +27

    Incredible, I love seeing every aspect gone over. The most serious part for me was seeing all the systems designed with failure in mind. All the back ups and life saving mechanisms point towards the reality of WWII, or I guess war in general. Where competent trained young people are valuable and there's a reason to try to preserve their lives, but where at the end of the day its expected that many will be dieing.

  • @TheGuyWhoisL0st
    @TheGuyWhoisL0st 3 місяці тому +2

    Hey! my grand pop was in WW2 and he's a pilot he ended up watching this vid and showing it to me saying "Let's see if he'll got it right" and in the end he said "Well it seems he did" and that's cool ngl.

  • @hawk0173
    @hawk0173 10 місяців тому +4

    I was a civilian pilot and I always adored the p51 Mustang, thanks, it's an impeccable job and very good detail.

  • @singular9
    @singular9 2 роки тому +88

    This is awesome. Would love to see more military gear too.

  • @sumerrana6805
    @sumerrana6805 2 роки тому +29

    This is just breathtaking
    Please give us a glimpse of what goes into making such high quality content

  • @VerbalCoffee
    @VerbalCoffee Рік тому +9

    This is amazing. I've always thought how much of a drag it is to have the scoop on the P-51. But learning about the Meredith effect and working to overcome most of the loss blew my mind.

  • @dglu9455
    @dglu9455 Рік тому +18

    This is an excellent video on one of the most game-changing aircraft in our historical arsenal. Sure, there are a few minor misstatements, but this is a general presentation for familiarization, not a detailed training video for someone who is going to suit up, complete a check ride, and fly the actual aircraft. Your animation skills are outstanding, the attention to detail is unmatched by anything else I've seen in this genre, and your overall presentation is so very well done. Keep up the good work.

  • @robertrowland9334
    @robertrowland9334 2 роки тому +48

    Thank you for making this. The amount of effort you put in must have been colossal.

    • @tommurphy4307
      @tommurphy4307 2 роки тому

      so...if youre an aeronautical engineer- not so much??

  • @georgevantuyl5837
    @georgevantuyl5837 Рік тому +19

    My next door neighbor was a crew chief on a P-51. He worked on the B through H and both Allison and the Merlin. That yellow coatingbo bthe aluminum is Aluminum Percolate. The camera is located on the left wing as it connects to the body. He a model that belonged in a museum that could be disassembled. Radiator scoop housed the oil cooler. The later models D. Had two Superchargers. His description of his aiming the 6 50 caliber was quite the process. The engine was running wide open throttle. The aircraft tied down with the tail raised. He said that after his crew worked on the aircraft. He would take the aircraft up and verify the repairs. He would often be called over to the airport to work on a P-51 and take me with him. I got to hand him wrenches and wire. After wards I had to buy the drinks.

  • @itissrinivasan
    @itissrinivasan Рік тому +2

    How many times have I watched an Animagraff video and been disappointed?
    Zero

  • @petemoore1805
    @petemoore1805 Рік тому +2

    Just wanted to tell you I’m laying in a hospital bed right now I have to make a decision today about whether to cut my hand off. I’m a 26 year airline pilot Captain and I was building an airplane in my garage. Just trying to gather some information so I can make a good decision about moving forward with a prosthetic via Amputation go down this long road of reconstruction doesn’t have a very optimistic prognosis. Just wanted to say thanks for that video. Being ignorant about how the FAA interacts with disabled people wanting to fly your video give me a little bit of hope I can still continue to fly with one hand. Thanks 1 million brother

    • @animagraffs
      @animagraffs  Рік тому

      You're in an unthinkable spot, my friend. Wow. I know the places I visit online and the creators I like have helped me through tough times. I'm glad my work is in some way doing that for you. I hope you find your strength, in whatever path life presents you going forward. Solidarity.

  • @gurmeens6469
    @gurmeens6469 2 роки тому +24

    What an amazing amount of information presented in a clean and descriptive manner. not a lot videos on UA-cam focus on details but the fame, clickbait and fake titles. Thanks for a being good sport for your work and dedication!

  • @rconger384
    @rconger384 2 роки тому +29

    4:30. Leland Atwood was the engineer that figured out how to apply the Meredeth Effect to the P51. One of the most effective applications of the effect in history.

    • @WalkaCrookedLine
      @WalkaCrookedLine 2 роки тому +3

      I was always under the impression the underwing air scoop fed the supercharger. Very convincing display showing I was wrong. Oil and coolant radiator arrangements are often overlooked but seem to be crucial to fighters of this era. Compare the corsair's arrangement of intakes in the wing leading edge near the wing roots.

  • @NeonFlare
    @NeonFlare 5 місяців тому +2

    Fascinating how much engineering went into these vehicles, astonishing for humanity in that era. I'd love to see you do a WW2 tank next

  • @backdraftdragon3150
    @backdraftdragon3150 8 місяців тому

    Im amazed the pilots could concentrate on fighting with all the other stuff they had to do. Talk about multitasking. Super brave dudes

  • @kimmer6
    @kimmer6 2 роки тому +4

    Very nice video. I got to ride in Bob Love's P-51D back in November 1982. There was no gunsight but up on the area where it once sat was an engraved marker that said ''ENGAGE BRAIN BEFORE TAKEOFF''. That was a day that I shall remember forever.

  • @Anshul9Kumar
    @Anshul9Kumar Рік тому +114

    Never seen such extremely high level of detailed animation. Amazed by the work and the presentation. Hats off to you 🙂👍🏻

  • @Tala2n
    @Tala2n 7 місяців тому

    The amount of modeling is insane, especially on real objects.

  • @silverback101
    @silverback101 Рік тому +2

    The propeller is an adjustable pitch propeller taking off to fly the pitch is lower,grabbing less air to enable the engine to have the power to gain altitude. At level flight the propeller adjusts to a higher pitch, grabbing more air based on the throttle position. Bombers use the feathering adjustment when an engine fails at this point the blades are in the direction of travel to keep them from wind milling. The Hamilton standard propeller is adjusted by oil pressure running through a spool valve being moved up or down by flyweights and a spring. the engineering is awesome. Oil comes from the engine oil system. Great video. God bless you all.

  • @calebmcurby8580
    @calebmcurby8580 2 роки тому +97

    I find analogue computational equipment more mystifying than their digital counterparts. I find it incredible that with just the inputs of dialing in wingspan and the relative size of the wings as viewed by the pilot, that the plane can compensate without the need for a digital computer. So amazing. And my desire to be a P-51 pilot grows 😂

    • @GeeTrieste
      @GeeTrieste 2 роки тому +5

      I want to try this on a simulator.

    • @GDBROWN
      @GDBROWN 2 роки тому +11

      This video shows just how much has been left out of our history teachings. It’s shameful that we are not given such knowledge that I believe we are obligated to teach the children of today and tomorrow. This video is about the P-51, but my statement can be made for all such innovation that we have been led to perceive as more primitive than what we build today.

    • @Jigaboo123456
      @Jigaboo123456 2 роки тому +9

      Yup, I thought that gunsight was amazingly efficient for its time, and a testament to human ingenuity. It must have given allied pilots flying a Mustang a massive advantage in deflection shooting.

    • @hasancinar7165
      @hasancinar7165 2 роки тому

      Qsk

    • @C.Sharpe
      @C.Sharpe 2 роки тому +3

      It's just math, but the ingenuity required to invent such a system is very fascinating and inspiring
      Edit: Good luck finding a way to fly one of these beauties. There aren't many left in the world and most of them are in the hands of private collectors, and sell for millions of dollars. There are, however, 75% scale airframes you can buy and build yourself for a couple hundred.
      Edit 2: A couple hundred thousand, sorry

  • @mustangtmg
    @mustangtmg 2 роки тому +148

    This is outstanding but there are just a few issues in addition to what's already been pointed out:
    The right wing has insignia on bottom, not top.
    The engine supercharger system doesn't clearly show the 2-stage/2-speed supercharger, and there's a "tube" between the outlet from the 2nd stage of the supercharger connecting to the intake runner, and the engines on all Merlin Mustangs had an aftercooler in that location.
    The filter system connected to the carb air intake ducting is not illustrated nor explained.
    They had one gun camera - in the left wing only.
    They had one landing/taxi light - in the left wing only.
    There doesn't seem to be a pitot probe - it should be on the underside of the right wing, about 4/5 the way out towards the wingtip.
    I hate to be critical - the quality of the video IS excellent, and maybe the creator can go back and do some fine-tuning of it.
    We warbird nuts are fanatics for accuracy...

    • @animagraffs
      @animagraffs  2 роки тому +61

      I appreciate you chiming in with corrections, it'll help the whole community have more accurate info! Animagraffs is all about solid quality work, not covering up errors. Your insight is much appreciated, and thanx for hanging around and enjoying the content and community here!

    • @nickm764
      @nickm764 2 роки тому +7

      I knew there would be at least one deuchebag pointing out small inaccuracies. Always is.

    • @LaminarSound
      @LaminarSound 2 роки тому +45

      @@nickm764 Hes not a douche bag for that. He was quite respectful and Animagraffs sure seems to have taken it professionally and honestly, it seems they WANT this type of feedback to enhance the channel.

    • @chefduane3742
      @chefduane3742 2 роки тому +2

      ^ Ain't that the truth. :)

    • @steviesevieria1868
      @steviesevieria1868 2 роки тому

      @@nickm764 yup

  • @JP-vs1ys
    @JP-vs1ys Рік тому +4

    This is ridiculously well done. Like over the top. Insane level of skill to create this.

  • @carlodave9
    @carlodave9 Рік тому +3

    Touring the Boeing Air & Space Museum is a humbling experience. These older specimens are incredible to look at; they're symphonies of engineering and machining long before computer aided design & manufacture. It's easy to appreciate them as objects of math, art and skill, not just war.

    • @wilburfinnigan2142
      @wilburfinnigan2142 7 місяців тому

      carlodave Did you mean the MUSEUM of FLIGHT at BOEING FIELD in Seattle ????

  • @felixcat9318
    @felixcat9318 Рік тому +59

    I have always loved and been fascinated by cutaway drawings of things, particularly vehicles, so this naturally caught my eye.
    Not only is this beautifully created, detailed and narrated, its interesting, informative and entertaining too!
    This is truly a masterpiece, thank you for sharing your exceptional artistry.

  • @dancollins8296
    @dancollins8296 2 роки тому +29

    This is absolutely amazing. I'm blown away by the detail and overall knowledge of this entire plane. Such a great well put together video

  • @rwfetterman2546
    @rwfetterman2546 8 місяців тому +1

    Outstanding video. Having once lived a few blocks away from the Van Nuys Airport there were several Saturday mornings the sky was filled with P-51's out for an early AM breakfast run, or flight. And there was the T-38 Aero Squadron with their own "Base" located on the West side of the field complete with Quonset huts and the required pole with boards listing cities and how many miles from home...

  • @AustinMBlevins
    @AustinMBlevins Рік тому +10

    My Grandpa flew one of these in WWII. He would be proud of this video if he were still alive today. Great work!!

  • @L0vbn56y
    @L0vbn56y Рік тому +9

    Excellent! Chuck Yeager told a great story, that on his first combat mission in his Mustang, he forgot to drain the rear tank first. When he returned with nearly empty wing tanks and a nearly full rear tank, the plane almost swapped ends due to the CG being so far aft. He managed to arrive safely.

  • @Skyhors3
    @Skyhors3 2 роки тому +5

    After my Dad got out of the Army Air Corps, in the late '40s and I was about 4, he often would go to airports and watch the pilots do touch and go's, and take me with him.
    At one airport there was a
    scrapped P-51 Mustang. He told me that's what it was. He lifted me into the cockpit and sat me in the pilot's seat.
    I still remember the cut wires where instruments had been removed, the stick, the bucket seat, the toggle switches, etc.
    I'm pretty sure the original P-51s had Allison engines, later replaced with Rolls-Royce.

  • @jamesmueller9819
    @jamesmueller9819 Рік тому +3

    2:53 The tailwheel would turn the opposite direction desired by the pilot's input on the rudder pedals. Push on the right pedal, the rudder moves to the right but the tailwheel would turn to the left moving the nose of the aircraft to the right.

  • @dmartin4414
    @dmartin4414 11 місяців тому +4

    Absolutely outstanding. Truly incredible and just about the most direct, clear, thorough, concise description of anything I've ever seen. Well-done, and please continue with what you are doing.

  • @Auraelius
    @Auraelius 2 роки тому +28

    Amazing! Smooth and logical path among the systems. I learned a thing or three, and I’ve been a fan of p-51s since childhood! Thanks so much.

  • @gnorwgnihtondidreltiH
    @gnorwgnihtondidreltiH 2 роки тому +10

    The amount of research that goes into this guy's videos is insane

    • @gnorwgnihtondidreltiH
      @gnorwgnihtondidreltiH 2 роки тому +4

      @Jay Rock AK Says a guy whose only educational videos are on cutting sushi rolls

    • @British-Dragon-Simulations
      @British-Dragon-Simulations 2 роки тому

      He got a hell of a lot of information wrong about the P-51 D. Even I counted 12 error's. He should re-make it with the correct information.
      A lot of mistakes inside the cockpit and the switches etc and how the propeller pitch, brakes, rockets and all the gun systems.

  • @kiwimax4659
    @kiwimax4659 4 місяці тому +1

    Whenever I attend an airshow, I always thrill to see a slick P51 in the sky or on the tarmac. Great reveal here of an amazing aircraft!

  • @Shadow0fd3ath24
    @Shadow0fd3ath24 Рік тому

    the Browning M2s ALONE are mechanical genius...let alone the rest! Truly an amazing incredibly fast and capable machine that we built an INCREDIBLE amount of long before computers

  • @cvcoco
    @cvcoco 2 роки тому +152

    To us and his wife of more than 50 years, my relative was an "engineer" and thats it. It was only after his death at old age, not just after the war, that we learned what he did all those decades in govt service and one stint was at the skunk works as a P-51 wing designer. We saw him often, dinners and holiday parties, and like the other family members in the military, he never breathed a single word about ANYTHING.

    • @lucasrem1870
      @lucasrem1870 2 роки тому +3

      Mitchel already passed when they started to build them
      The Submarine!

    • @madezra64
      @madezra64 2 роки тому +12

      It speaks volumes about his dedication, pride, and brilliance for the whole program. Blows my mind the stuff they did with analogue avionics almost 80 years ago, and I'm only freaking 29!!!

    • @drgondog
      @drgondog 2 роки тому +5

      skunk works was a Lockheed name for Kelly Johnson's Advanced Design Group. As a wing design engineer on the P-51, he would have worked under Edgar Schmued.

    • @lucasrem1870
      @lucasrem1870 2 роки тому +2

      @@drgondog skunk works is still a part of construction, developing for the US Army.

    • @pavelglos6181
      @pavelglos6181 2 роки тому

      @@drgondog "Kelly Johnson's Advanced Design Group. As a wing designer on the P-51, he would work under Edgar Schmued." Please tell me more about how it was? He asks a Central European and amateur admirer of the masters of his field, only.

  • @randyjennings3075
    @randyjennings3075 2 роки тому +6

    Thank you SOOOOO much for making this video. My dad was a combat Mustang pilot in the war. I knew much of his experience, from his stories, but this truly filled in some holes.

  • @mrcarlo1966
    @mrcarlo1966 11 місяців тому +3

    Thank you for doing such a great job on these videos. The best part are the corrections because nobody could expect to know every facet in detail of all of the objects you are describing. You have one of the best channels on UA-cam.

  • @aqueenslander
    @aqueenslander Рік тому +7

    Beautifully detailed description. I felt I could jump into the P51D and go into battle !

  • @SaeedAcronia
    @SaeedAcronia 2 роки тому +17

    The spar and rib spacing is one of the coolest engineering trade-offs in aerospace engineering. You need to consider weight, bending stresses, twisting stresses, center of mass, center of pressure, fluctuation and aeroelasticity, and of course cost.

    • @Josh-hr5mc
      @Josh-hr5mc 2 роки тому

      This is an underated comment. This is what facinates me about the F-14, to me its a modern marvel. I still can't believe some of this is possible for lack of better words

  • @davidmorris4353
    @davidmorris4353 Рік тому +6

    My grandfather worked on the P51D project at North American Aviation in Grand Prairie Texas.
    He moved his family there along with thousands of others producing this amazing machine that finally allowed fighter escorts to stay with our bombers all the way to Berlin and back! The engineering of this plane for its time was incredible!
    Even today EVERY modern fighter pilot longs to fly the legendary P51!
    I have a great photo of him standing in front of one of the D models rolling out of assembly in June 1944.
    P51D. . .NAZI KILLER!

  • @robhappe853
    @robhappe853 Місяць тому

    Damn, this is amazing. I clicked for the p51d but this style is exactly how I can quickly learn things like this. Please do tons more of these videos on everything from hydro electric dams, to modern cars and electronics.

  • @Howlingburd19
    @Howlingburd19 Рік тому

    Two of some of the best sounds ever: the flight of a P-51 Mustang, and the “ping” of an M1 Garand :)

  • @lawrencequave7361
    @lawrencequave7361 2 роки тому +3

    Up until 2018 I taught basic aeronautics subjects to high school students. The curriculum included learning the major parts of an airplane by building a plastic scale model, and learning basic flying maneuvers using FSX on a flight sim. The model I chose for them to build one year was the P-51D. I wish I had had this graphic back them for them to use as a guide for building their model and for learning what all the controls look like and their functionality. This is the absolute best graphic I've ever seen for doing that. You're to be congratulated. Can't wait to see more. I've 'liked' and 'subscribed'. Thanks for such excellent work. (And I, too, would love to know how you did it.)

  • @muzzaball
    @muzzaball 2 роки тому +6

    This was fantastic. I have books and mags which show exploded views etc but having all the details in this video production was top notch. Really well done Sir, my hat is off to you - thank you. And regardless off the few inaccuracies as listed, it very eloquently provides more detail than anything out there at present. I stand by my appreciation. Cheers.

  • @jololol7158
    @jololol7158 11 місяців тому

    I’ve heard of the P51 when I first played Heroes Over Europe on the Xbox 360 and I immediately fell in love with it. Sigh… I miss playing that game.

  • @Shadow0fd3ath24
    @Shadow0fd3ath24 8 місяців тому

    Just the rear gear engineering is a marvel

  • @Rhazio
    @Rhazio 2 роки тому +114

    Its impressive how not even 30 years passed since WW1 and planes made a big leap with engineering. Its pretty baffling

    • @laumv
      @laumv 2 роки тому +1

      WW1: July 28, 1914 - November 11, 1918; WW2: September 1, 1939 - September 2, 1945. They had some time to make technological advances.

    • @Rhazio
      @Rhazio 2 роки тому +16

      @@laumv Those advancements are pretty impressive within that time frame

    • @ross-carlson
      @ross-carlson 2 роки тому +1

      WTF - it's been 100+ years since WW1, which this plane did NOT fly in (very few did) and roughly 80 years since WW2. Yes, that's relatively short in terms of how old the fucking earth is - but it's 2-3 TIMES longer than 30 years.
      You do know Google exists, right? So you don't have to look this ignorant? I guess it's a choice?

    • @cantmakethisstuffup255
      @cantmakethisstuffup255 2 роки тому +26

      Obviously he was talking about the time period from WWI to WWII.

    • @gonuts4donuts
      @gonuts4donuts 2 роки тому +6

      @@Rhazio but it's not really all that impressive considering the First World War created an arms race. It was inevitable at that point aircraft (among other things like ships, submarines, tanks, small arms, etc.) would improve.
      The biggest technological advance really is from the Wright brothers' first powered flight in 1903 to WWI in 1914. Here we saw aircraft in mass production ("mass" for the timeframe considering materials and construction methods used), pilots had proper upright sitting positions, stick and rudder controls, more efficient propellers being driven by more powerful engines. These aircraft began carrying machine guns and would eventually duel in the skies. These aircraft were capable of maneuvers that were the basis of tactics going into WWII and still to this day.
      These planes started carrying grenades and bombs, first dropped by hand, then by mechanical linkages under the wings. WWI saw monoplane fighters, triplanes, parasol winged fighters, the first metal monoplane fighters, aircraft carrying aerial rockets, large caliber heavy machine guns and autocannons, amphibious aircraft, four engine heavy bombers conducting strategic bombing with bomb loads that would have been thought unlikely in 1913 before the war began.
      Yes, world war 2 brought us the best piston engine fighters leading into the rocket and jet fighter age, but 1903 to 1914-1918 is probably the biggest technological jump for aircraft in such a short amount of time rather than 1918 to ~1936-1945 where more time was utilized to introduce and advance these technologies with large scale industries and better materials.

  • @jeffrich614
    @jeffrich614 2 роки тому +24

    Thank you for such an incredible video. My father flew the P-51 and this video helped me to appreciate his accomplishments (and all of his cohorts) even more.

    • @huckleberryfinn338
      @huckleberryfinn338 2 роки тому +2

      My father flew this plane. I was wishing he was still here because he loved to talk about it. He died last May 31 2021 at age 101.7 years old. He said he wanted to continue flying after the war but said air force wasn't hiring. He said he was offered a free p-51 propeller but the shipping was $1000.

    • @jeffrich614
      @jeffrich614 2 роки тому +1

      @Pepe Noir There were several different varieties of the P-51. This one is same aircraft flown by my father. Saying it's not a P 51 is absurd; I have no idea what point you are trying to make.

  • @Skaggins
    @Skaggins Рік тому +13

    This is brilliant! I really appreciate the time you took to make it.

  • @stephenwhorton4942
    @stephenwhorton4942 Місяць тому

    When Herman Goering saw the p51 flying over Germany he said, we've lost the war. The laminar airflow wing is what made this airplane so spectacular.

  • @NoGreedSeeds
    @NoGreedSeeds Рік тому +4

    This is the first of many I’ll be watching over the next binge sessions. Hope there’s a bunch, this was thorough, and nearly a manual. Loved every second of it. My favorite part was the description of the gunsight. 16:13

  • @thornmollenhoff8698
    @thornmollenhoff8698 2 роки тому +5

    THat was neat to see... well done

  • @Steve-0220
    @Steve-0220 3 місяці тому +1

    I think I'm ready for my Oral, Sir!?
    You obviously studied as hard or harder for this Video than I did for my final Line Check in the B - 767!
    Thanks from someone who started studying & assembling Revell P 51 models at age 9 or 10 & thought he knew an airplane he only sat in once at an airshow as a 2nd Lieutenant.
    Sierra Hotel!!! My hats off to you.

  • @juanmanuelpenaloza9264
    @juanmanuelpenaloza9264 4 місяці тому

    From afar, it’s a very simple plane. But looking at everything going on inside, it's no wonder it gets so much praise. The design and the features all combined to make the most advanced prop fighter in the war, capable of rolling against the German jets.

  • @robertellisphotographyandc6101
    @robertellisphotographyandc6101 2 роки тому +8

    Great video and animation. Quick technical point - the Merlin is actually a Rolls Royce design. At some point licensed to Package for manufacture in the US. Superior to the original Allison V-12 fitted in earlier P-51s. More power at high altitudes due to 2 stage supercharging.

  • @Rationalific
    @Rationalific 2 роки тому +4

    The intricate yet brilliantly comprehensible design of the P-51D and other planes like it is just amazing. Planes came a long way in just 4 decades! And your incredible look into this engineering feat is worth a subscription to your channel, even without needing to check out what other videos you have. It's that good!

  • @otherhervey
    @otherhervey 6 місяців тому

    The engineering was so much more advanced than I thought. It's hard to believe that all of those features were in a plane in 1944.

  • @stargazeronesixseven
    @stargazeronesixseven Рік тому +1

    Excellent tutorial on the Legendary North American P51D Mustang!

  • @jonathanolsen7254
    @jonathanolsen7254 2 роки тому +27

    The motor that I have from my father is a Merlin, we did find out years ago that the motor was taken from a P51 and the Aircraft was in a roll over that the Aircraft was a total a total loss, I worked at Northwest Airlines as a A. and E and went and rebuilt the motor as if it was going back into another Aircraft. Just the amount of fuel to run this motor is unreal. I have had offers to sell this motor but if I were to sell it then it's gone, and I can't ever see this engine run Agen. It takes a lot to get the motor going because of the prestart up but once that is done it's a sound like no other engine, Its rock and Roll time...

  • @vimalalwaysrocks
    @vimalalwaysrocks 2 роки тому +7

    Am stunned how these WW2 era plans already had "dashcams" mounted on each wing! Wonderful detailed video. Subbed!

    • @vimalalwaysrocks
      @vimalalwaysrocks 2 роки тому

      @Pepe Noir okay mr "genius"

    • @Hal9023
      @Hal9023 2 роки тому

      @@vimalalwaysrocks you did say “am stunned”, it’s one letter to make it “I am stunned”

  • @xxskippernate409xx6
    @xxskippernate409xx6 2 місяці тому

    The ailerons have balance tabs which would be referred to as "trim tabs", if the aileron goes up, the "trim tab" goes down. This makes pilot input require less effort, thus making aileron inputs easier. The rudder and elevators have anti-balance tabs which move into the direction of input. If the rudder goes left, the tab goes farther left. Elevator goes up, the tab goes farther up. These make it require more effort to pull the stick and use the rudder and elevator. With tailwheel locked (connected to rudder), the tailwheel only turns 6° left and 6° right. For tighter turns, the stick is pushed forward to allow the tailwheel to swivel, and the pilot uses left or right brakes to turn with tailwheel unlocked.

  • @TeargasHorse
    @TeargasHorse 10 місяців тому

    I love this, it's actually useful information for IL-2 Sturmovick and DCS! Now I NEED, P-47, P-38, Mosquito, Hurricane, Yak 1(and7 and 9), LA-5, B-25, PE-2, A-10, F-16, and... and... and... and..

  • @sethsponhower
    @sethsponhower 2 роки тому +41

    I absolutely love this video!! you MUST do one on the F4U Corsair!!! That is my favorite fighter plane from WWII and did several models of it when I was a kid and even a study report for class once! Great graphics work!!

    • @aefbNone
      @aefbNone 2 роки тому

      no, hellcat pls to see how foldable wings work

    • @yuribezmenovthegreat4705
      @yuribezmenovthegreat4705 2 роки тому

      We need one for the best dive bomber in ww2. JUNKER 87-B

    • @StratMatt777
      @StratMatt777 Рік тому +4

      @Pepe Noir Why are you so unhappy?

  • @longstreet0163
    @longstreet0163 2 роки тому +19

    This was absolutely brilliant. Thanks for putting it together and posting. I had no real idea just how sophisticated these aircraft were. I was constantly saying "I didn't know that !!". The pilots must have been exceptionally well trained to understand and use all that equipment. These days a lot of that stuff is handled by computers. I learned SO much so thanks again !!

    • @draxicous906
      @draxicous906 Рік тому

      If you have an older car and understand how an engine works and translate that to air functionality and realize that a full-fledged transmission is no longer needed it can be simple to convert that understanding. Planes like these are simple compared to new jets that to be effective require new computers and the better computers both in the jet and missiles win due to the fact most will stay away from the "MAR" and stay 10 miles away from each other, and not merge if they can help it. whereas this plane was designed for the merge and air-to-ground warfare.

  • @roybradley5532
    @roybradley5532 Рік тому +1

    1:37:The yellowish Green color of the air frame is a Zinc Chromate coating. Every time I see it, it reminds me of my army helicopter mechanic years. This is a great video. P-51 Mustang is one of my favorite fixed wings. it ranks right up there with the A-10 Warthog.

  • @ZZz3rDeYezZZ
    @ZZz3rDeYezZZ Рік тому

    After seeing this excellent & highly detailed instructional video, a certain song comes to mind...
    🎼"I believe I can flyyyyyyy"

  • @g.w.7893
    @g.w.7893 2 роки тому +8

    The six segregated flight instruments are sometimes referred to as the 'sacred six'. Brilliant video btw.

  • @robertbrode6282
    @robertbrode6282 2 роки тому +18

    An incredible video that clearly shows the P-51's skeleton, engine, armament and so much more. This was/is an amazing video!!

  • @user-cr3jr8cg7k
    @user-cr3jr8cg7k 5 місяців тому

    Отличный фильм! Смотрел с интересом даже не зная английского языка! Всё и так понятно. Автору благодарность.

    • @_Kenton_
      @_Kenton_ 4 місяці тому

      Чувак. Этот самолет изобретали дилетанты, не знающие реалий боя. Достаточно глянуть на его цвет, а мизерная скороподъемность не дает ему ни единого шанса соревноваться с ЯК-3 и 109 на вертикали, а на горизонтали бои к тому моменту стали анахронизмом

  • @dingznthingz
    @dingznthingz 5 місяців тому +2

    WOw! One of the best descriptions of a P-51 Mustang I have ever seen. The computerized animation is also outstanding. I subscribed to your UA-cam link and will be searching for more of your videos.