Viral Math Problem | Viral Math Problem 8/2(2+2) answer | Viral Math Problem 8÷2(2+2)
Вставка
- Опубліковано 15 вер 2024
- Welcome to RV TUTORIALS
In this video I am going to explain how to solve the problem 8÷2(2+2) using BODMAS.
Brakets
Orders
Division
Multiplication
Addition
Subtraction.
Background music :- UA-cam Audio Library
Your Quaries :-
1) 8÷2(2+2) = 1 or 16?
Like, share and subscribe
Thanks for watching........
3by3 magic squad please answer me sar❤
The correct answer is: 8/2(2+2)= 8/(2x2+2x2)= 8/(4+4)= 8/8= 1 (the implicit product must be resolved first, distributive can be used to solve the ambiguity)
We cannot assume (8/2)x(2+2)= 4x4= 16 it is wrong because it separates the implicit multiplier 2 from the (2+2).
You are totally incorrect critiba. 8÷2×4, any grade 5 learner will tell you that the answer is 16. By using simple mathematical rules. You are saying 2×4 =8. But it is ÷2×4
According to the American Mathematical Council any expression as a/bc should be resolved as a/(bc) and not (a/b)c. The exemple is the Bhascara formulae: (-b+-SQRT(b²-4ac))/2a. Note that the 2a must be resolved first otherwise the result will be wrong.
Agree
Bro just learned distributive property and try to use it for the ver first time 💀💀💀
Super🎉🎉🎉🎉
Lets just make it easy. !!!
When we have these long and complicated equations we normally split it into segments.
Splitting this terribly complicated equation into segments, is a method that is INCONTROVERTIBLE.
[Look for explicit operators not enclosed in brackets, then put brackets around each segment.] This simplifies and clarifies these long and tedious equations.
i.e. 8 / 2(2+2) -> [8] / [2(2+2)]
Now we clearly see it is 8 / 8 = 1
For people who do not understand parenthesis, this avoids the silly question of what to do 1st.
So now, anyone can understand.
Except you are wrong.
@@MrGreensweightHist If I am wrong then (2*1+2*2) =/= 2(1+2). Skyscrapers collapse, bridges fall...
But (2*1+2*2) = 2(1+2). Notice the equal sign. This means one expression can be substituted for the other.
@@mikestuart7674
You are wrong.
Your hyperbole does not change that.
10/2(3) =15.
But by your logic
10/2(3) = 2
Which means, by YOUR logic
10*0.5*3 = 2
Your way is inconsistent, and therefore not real math
Engineers do not use math according to YOUR way.
@@MrGreensweightHist Once again
you can get nothing right.
10 / 2(3) = 10 / 6
Its your logic that says its
10*0.5*3 = 2
And that expression = 15... not 2
So again you fail miserably.
BTW where did you get 2.
@@MrGreensweightHist 10/2(3) would be 10/6 or 5/3 or 1 2/3 or 1.6666
10/2*3 isn’t the same as 10/2(3) this is because of how division works when put into an inline format works, 2(3) is a single term whereas 2*3 is two terms.
Division has a vinculum which is also a grouping symbol and if you wanted it not to group things that would be grouped you out it in brackets like (10/2)(3) or use an explicit multiplication sign 10/2*3
16
So let's go all the way back to pre algebra. You should always check your work.
Let's make this an equation so we can do so.
8÷2(2+2) = 8÷2(4).
Let's have Y = 4
So, the equation is 8÷2(y)=16, according to you.
8÷2y=16 becomes 8/2y=16
Reduce
4/y=16 Simplify 4=16y simplify 4/16=y simplify 1/4=y
Let's put the y back now.
1/4=4 this is obviously a false statement.
Let's do this with 1. Y still equals 4.
8÷2(y)=1 simplify 8/2y=1
Reduce
4/y=1 which is y=4
4=4 is a true statement.
This means the answer is indeed 1.
PEMDAS isn't wrong. Everyone who is getting it wrong is skipping the most overlooked part of P (or B, depending). That is that the multiplier on the outside of the parenthesis (called the coefficient) is PART of the parenthesis. The distributive property is fundamental and can't be changed to make an argument work.
Check your work.
Why u are making it so much hard and lengthy , it's very simple just the bodmas is required it solved it in my mind and got 16 and u went all way back to algebra
What you don’t realize is that 8/2(y) and 8/2 (y) are completely different. Another way to write 8/2 (y) is 8y/2 not 8/2y.
why do they always change the order of the problem in order to get 16?
Actually it is the people getting 1 that are doing it out of order.
@@MrGreensweightHist it's nothing to do with the order of operations, it seems American's struggle with division.
@@johng.1703 Then you'll have to explain why this German agrees with the Americans: ua-cam.com/video/Xw3PgAbsxng/v-deo.html
8÷2×4 . Even if you don't change order 8÷2 =8×1/2.
@@harrymatabal8448 you would still need to multiply that by 1/4 if you are changing it to a multiplication. Or do people just not know how division groups things?
The answer is 16
That is the ONLY valid answer
Anyone getting 1 is not following the orders of operations