Socionics - Extroverted Thinking (Te). High valuing Te compared to high valuing Ti.
Вставка
- Опубліковано 19 жов 2024
- Some real world comparisons of what Ti users are into vs Te. Just look at what many Socionics UA-camrs like to talk about and the methods they focus on.
Bear in mind : types like ILE , SLE, SLI and ILI are excellent using both kinds of thinking. These types are strong at both but still favor one more than the other.
Returning Champion : Peter Bartl interview
www.youtube.co...
Shane Starr interview:
www.youtube.co...
Shane Starr UA-cam page:
/ @shaneaverystarr
Thank you for the video and for the shout out too. Great work!
I suspect I'm IEI which would make me Te PoLr. This explains why I hate it when people ask me to explain my reasoning, explain why I got to a certain conclusion or ask for proof. That's just not how my brain works and I think people should be satisfied enough with whether the things I'm saying make sense and whether they end up being true or not. I do try to provide outside proof and back up what I say, but I can't actually explain my thought process to other people. This has led to some people thinking I have Ti PoLr, while other people think I lead with Ti. I guess I lean a lot on Ti to make sure my ideas make sense to people, but I also don't think Ti is my greatest strength.
21:00 why bro being held captive out there? Someone turn the lights on lol
In Model A SLI, SLE, ILI, ILE gather information from Ti & Te hand in hand as equals.
Demonstrative and Creative both have a total of 6 D.
How?
Demonstrative:
4D strength + 2D value = 6D
Creative:
3D Strength + 3D value = 6D
--------------------------------
Model G shows we put 4D conscious effort (energy) in the Creative. But only 3D of unconscious effort (energy) in the Demonstrative.
And:
Model G shows we favor the Demonstrative on the job benefiting primarily society. And the Creative off the job in our favorite hobbies benefiting primarily ourselves.
But we dip into each all the time.
Especially if we love our job. And our job is our favorite hobby.
TI is responsible for creating clarity and certainty in all aspects. How can you define FI in comparison?
You can picture Fi similarly as a clarity of the resonance of attraction. The strength, purity and other intricacies of the sentiment and magnetic pull or draw toward the other
At logical information. Fi is personal sentiment towards a person, object or topic. It’s more about you clear feelings towards someone. This is more apparent when you notice how someone feels towards another person or how they make character evaluations that do not change with mood.
@@PracticalSocionics ok, thanks
@@mattevans8090 Is the attraction aimed only at subjects or also inanimate objects?
@@pierarcher2522just as Jason noted- it can be a person, thing, or even abstract ideas.
And remember Fi isn’t the attraction or resonance itself, however it’s the cognitive attention TO that attraction/sentiment.
If you think of High level Ti being able to organize biology in extremely complex ways (like in Jason’s video example)- High level Fi has an extremely complex and nuanced apprehension of all the sentiments associated with that resonance and attraction.
Your distinction between Ti and Te reminds me of the distinction often made between Intuitives and Sensors. Your version of 'Te' (like 'sensing') is grounded in the practical and provable; while your version of 'Ti' (like "intuition") seems oriented toward theory and philosophy.
I would like to see you do a review of CPT Harry Murrell’s theory. It’s ok, you can yell and scream if you need to. 🍿
That would be headache inducing