Witches of Eastwick Interview with Michelle Pfeiffer, Susan Sarandon and Cher
Вставка
- Опубліковано 26 вер 2024
- In this unedited interview for Austin's KVUE-TV, Roy Faires sits down with actresses Michelle Pfeiffer, Susan Sarandon, and Cher to talk about their latest film, The Witches of Eastwick (1987), also starring Jack Nicholson. The women share their experiences filming particular scenes as well as their dream cast for a musical version of the movie. Faires worked as a special project director and entertainment critic/reporter at KVUE-TV, Austin's ABC affiliate, from 1976-1989..
Jesus Christ, I forgot how gorgeous Pfeiffer was during this period.
Still is.
yes @@novac0844
Facts omg
Michelle looks so divine in this interview…I was born after the movie was released but I remember watching it many times growing up it’s a classic
I was born in 1984 and I watched the movie many years later.
Michelle is stunning! 🥰
She is and will always be my ultimate supreme goddess!! ❤❤️❤️❤️
and cher looks like a drag queen.
They all are
@@13blackcatzzz yes. She's always been so lovely.
Susan in her day was just unbeatable ❤
The camera work here was dreadful. Very odd that Michelle was kind of ignored and only asked one question and seemed to sit at a distance to the other ladies. But anyway, Witches of Eastwick is an excellent timeless film that will always be dear to my heart. ❤️
yup!
Prob a female videographer...lol...jealous.
And Susan keeps rolling her eyes.
@@ayoutubegirl5933 🤣😂true
It’s not odd. An interviewer addresses those who are more verbal and focused, if possible, which Pfeiffer wasn’t. She looked very spacey. To some extent, the camera had to follow the interview. Given that Pfeiffer is notoriously shy, and like many actors she’s uncomfortable in public without a character to play (according to her), the camera person did what they could.
I recently saw an old interview with Peter O’Toole, who’s now famous as a raconteur, but who did an hourlong solo interview with Dick Cavett in the early 70s in which he could barely talk. He wasn’t drunk, either, he just wasn’t comfortable. He was literally stuttering and squirming. And chainsmoking. Some actors take to the publicity process, some don’t. Pfeiffer never really has.
3 amazing ladies.
3 Hollywood Legends!
Three legends interviewed..
What a dream team of actresses!!! All sexy, beautiful and amazingly talented in their own unique way! Love this movie!!!
Michelle is just absolutely beautiful 🤩
Michelle Pfeiffer 😍😍😍
Three hellyweird satanick masonick demonick entertainment industry created sellouts and gender inverted men sitting on a couch masquerading as women allegedly ?
Thank you very much for posting this! What a pity that the interviewer clearly had zero interest in Michelle Pfeiffer, focusing his attention predominantly on Cher and Sarandon. Big mistake, hope he realized later with regret. Nevertheless it is always a delight to see these pearls from glorious blockbuster movies re-emerge in the Internet era. And Michelle was drop dead gorgeous here, so magnificent and sexy. Thanks again!! 😊
Three hellyweird satanick masonick demonick entertainment industry created sellouts and gender inverted men sitting on a couch masquerading as women allegedly ?
Michelle Pfeiffer was at her most beautiful in the late 80's. Have never seen this interview before and she is just so stunning here that it's a shame there was so little attention given to her at the time. Thanks for posting this gem!
Pfeiffer is notoriously shy and looked spaced out, so the interviewer probably worked with Sarandon and Cher because they were livelier and seemed more engaged with the situation.
People are commenting on Michelle’s looks, and yes, she was/is beautiful, but I noticed her body language. She is sitting away from the other women. I always thought she was quite shy ( I think I heard that?). She has stayed ( smartly) away from the spotlight, except when talking about a film she is doing:)
My goodness Michelle was so beautiful
Chers voice is so soothing
Why do they all look bored, uncomfortable and slightly deranged?
You don't need to look. Listening to the interviewer is plenty enough to answer your own question.
They may be tired You know busy schedule
Cocaine
Yes I was thinking high or just tired. Or they could be acting pompous.
@@Soul.Is.Willing yes or a combination
Each one of them seem irritated with eachother. 3 powerhouses having to listen to eachother analyze their collective work probably was frustrating. Each of these ladies were and are highly talented, smart, opinionated and philosophically different in their views of the industry and their art in general. I do not see a competitiveness here, but I see strong personalities.
I didn’t get that vibe at all! I think they’re more irritated and bored with doing interviews all day.
@@CatharticCreation probably right
Totally. You can really feel the tension!
I remember all three being very good friends for years afterwards, and very complimentary about Jack's attitude during the shoot.
I recently learned that Susan Sarandon was pissed that Cher got the part in Witches of Eastwick that she thought was to be hers. She accused Cher of stealing her part. With that information, it's pretty clear to me that Susan was being a bit juvenile here. Michelle Pfeiffer and Cher are reportedly best friends, so make of this information what you will. 😊
The one thing that irritates me is that there are no interviews with Jack anywhere even though he plays the film’s main antagonist. You would think that the three main ladies of the film AND their arch nemesis would be promoting this movie. I would love to hear Jack’s take on a misogynist character like Darryl.
I never researched the subject. However, given how so little Nicholson's interviews are out there, I guess he doesn't like that part of the job very much.
I, for one, couldn't possibly blame him, especially seeing what actually goes on during this sorry excuse of an Interview.
@@kextrz He very rarely ever gave taped for TV interviews...like for years...I think he had a policy against doing them. One fairly recent exception in the last decade or so....he did one for a Roger Corman documentary. He did do print interviews over the years though.
Subsequently, each of those women has complained about the director and the production, but has specifically said that Nicholson was great to work with and treated them all well, and respectfully. The fact that he showed up on set just to help Sarandon and the movie, when he wasn’t required to be on camera, says a lot. Actors often mention that as something special, when big-name stars bother to do that. Apparently it’s a rare thing, and is much appreciated.
It was indeed one of the biggest movies of the summer. Counting June through August of 1987, it ranked third after The Untouchables and Stakeout.
Susan's expression when he called it a "perfectly cast film" was priceless. If you know, you know.
At 1:05 Susan is PISSED that Cher cut her off...lol
😂 totally!
Yeah, I noticed that too.
Lol I noticed that too
Omg, I didn't notice, but yes!
@@angelsbite5898 Yep!
These witches could have had their way with me. ❤❤❤
It looks like each of them is on something different 😅
Three hellyweird satanick masonick demonick entertainment industry created sellouts and gender inverted men sitting on a couch masquerading as women allegedly ?
I thought the same thing! 😆
Uppers, downers and mood stabilizers.
It really does lol
They're on the same couch.
love this movie and all of the ladies
The camera work is hallucinating.😂
They seemed a bit annoyed by the interviewer
Michelle ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤ - so divine beauty and gorgeous.
A great movie 🍿🎥 with these beautiful women
Great interviewer. Stunning ladies. Contrary to what a lot of people think here, I think all three of them get a long just fine - you can see it at the end…
Michelle Pfeiffer looks like Rose the Hat from Dr. sleep
Is there tension between Michelle and the other ladies?
They seemed annoyed with each other and the interviewer! Lol
Legendary, Jack Nicholson was also amazing, what a face, what a character, what a persona, the real feminists back in the days who faced real problems with sexism, amazing classy females. Absolutely gorgeous, sexy, classy, powerful, talented, the voice of Cher is phenomenal, the woman used to sing along with Tina Turner a powerhouse of vocals.
When will they make a sequel?
Cher and Susan are absolutely wonderful actors. I was thinking in the beginning is Michelle O.K?
Beautiful
@2:08 wtf lol
Angelina Jolie is notorious for this as well. Watch her in interviews & movies. A serious oral fixation. 👄
Amo a las 3, hermosa Michelle Pfeiffer, viendo desde Bolivia 🇧🇴🇧🇴.
Three hellyweird satanick masonick demonick entertainment industry created sellouts and gender inverted men sitting on a couch masquerading as women allegedly ?
All he asks them about is the seduction scenes and clothes.
Susan eyes. Man I love her
I like Cher and Michelle attitudes, but Susan was bossy in this interview...
I think all 3 of them look and act so BORED about this interview! I don't think they want to be there.
2:08 Oh yeah!
That couch tho.
Cher is so sweet love her
Notice a blond a red head and a raven looks familiar?
What does that means?
Why is Michelle so distant?
A combination of drugs, being naturally introverted and in the company of co-stars who's egos made her skin crawl.
Michelle has only been acting 5 years Cher and Susan are Veterans but at this time it looks as there is an age Gap as well . Susan was the actress with the chops. Cher speaks is great but she does need to share. I do believe there was alot of script changes. This makes it very difficult. Michelle is quiet shy demure she loves the craft is acting but not the spotlight.
The ego battle must have been big on this movie. Cher with her musical success, MP having done Scarface and about to become the biggest female star globally, and Sarandon about to get big the following year with Bull Durham and eventually Thelma and Louise. I suspect MP and SS never felt Cher was a proper actress, only for her to get an Oscar for Moonstruck a year later. The envy.....No wonder MP played cat woman....Then youve got randy jack on set, preying on all 3 of them. Fun and games this movie set must have been.
Susan's eye roll at 1:13, talking over Cher - very unprofessional. Cher and Michelle made up for that 👏
🤣They look really annoyed with the interviewer, and by the way ladies...Jack N. you three seduced the scenes, LOVE witches of Eastwick' for the 3 women that own the movie ❤️
Those sofas are shocking!!
Susan and Cher are both beautiful women, but they look average sitting next to Michelle.
And a Musical version did come to fact
Looks like sarandon and Cher are super annoyed by eachother 🤔😬
Years later, Susan accused Cher of being difficult on set. In his interview, I can sense her tension with Cher, in my opinion. I’m team Cher all the way though 😂
Are you 12? You wasn't even there so you don't know how she was during work.
Cher!!❤
Cher was already old in 1987, she had been around since the 70's.
7:15: 'I haven't been successful at everything I've attempted'.....then remembers she's cher.....oh actually I have. Lol
is michelle stoned?
Sukie the adult deer göt everything.
Also new species leash.
Good for my heart.
Sukie obeys the laws of physics most of the time.
Fun movie, thank you.
Time for a spinoff! :D
Blue devil got both barrels.
Shredded coconut dust
And the serve cooked beef that place here buemont Lexington KY USA.
Susan Sarandon is pretty irritated
1:10 Sue got a little annoyed there!
There iis sso much under the lines here that I need to change my stuff.
They all hate each other, are competitors at work and are also bored as fuck and want to go to sleep. Ordinary women represent real women, us, that's all.
i love boygenius
They look like they do not get along:
three goddesses smirking over a real loser as an interviewer...that look from pfeiffer was enough to disrobe any man...he showed zero respect for her and she was the best thing in the film...
Your hair is so silky! Gorgeous
Your username, made me laugh! Then I saw your picture Lmao!! 🤣🤣 😹Love them!
Who is that cat? Lol! & who's hair is silky?
@@Dreamskater100 Haha, thanks. I meant to post this comment on a hair tutorial video I watched right before this. I shouldn’t be on UA-cam before I have my coffee , ha ☕️
@@ABadHairDay Lol! Well their hair is nice anyway! That cat still lol!
@@Dreamskater100 Lol. Yeah I don’t know who’s cat this is but it’s actually from a poster that was pretty popular in the 90’s. It was this picture of this cat on a poster and it said “A bad hair day”. I wish I still had it haha.
@@ABadHairDay Yeah I think I remember it now! You can always print it of poster size. It's so funny!
sukie do you got that desert rose jag email out their on you computers.
that is something else.
Michelle bunların içinde sanki elmas gibi ayrıca şapka çok yakışmış güzelime napiyim kanım çok ısınıyor elimde değil seviliyorsun Michelle hanım ❤️
Why this interviewer? Why? Why? Why?
I love Susan Sarandons eyes is that weird??
....ДЕВОЧКИ ВЫГЛЯДЕЛИ В """ ИСТВИКСКИХ ВЕДЬМАХ """ ПОТРЯСАЮЩЕ , ....
НО ! ШЕР БЫЛА ПРОСТО НЕВОЗМОЖНОЙ ...... НЕПОДРАЖАЕМОЙ !!!
....ЭТО ОДИН ИЗ МОИХ САМЫХ ЛЮБИМЫХ ФИЛЬМОВ ! )
Sukie adverse reaction
Grease two was that.
Their own done cant live like this live somewhere else.
If i had to guess.
More budget to avoid
Item one avoid.
Item two avoid.
They showed up got. Investment cash not that much.
Tôp of that hill.
Real death operatives soul leaking to warm ocean.
Lets guess iron duke style.
Perks you coffee also.
Little friend.
Consumerism and industrial output monopoly.
real witches!?
What relax, strange interview!
sukie do you know where i can get ah vegas jenga cocaine flea dip.
Michelle Phieffer, how does it feel to be a blonde?....Cher! Maybe you can answer that for her
I know that Hollywood is infested with inversion makes me think here
The architect from somewhere else not familiar here in USA.
Showing you sukie place.
French chatue traditional 4.37.
Me Moe ten commandments know where located. Only. Not published place like.
Sukie be surprised that much attention to uniform public controversy.
Investment Bonanza not many q&a all.
weird
sukie whats the name new finance who magazine.
steve earl babylonia motor gone.
on time and under budget.
Children very quick around here.
Payday. Clean cotton sukie.
Buemont lexington kentucky usa.
Divorce wife never met was final long time ago.
Public speech.
Avoid that peyote dissappear ing train.
Public speech today.
new another pure peyote incident. kentucky pharoh of pharohs house. myself and mofo.
table development in process. all the way to formal dining.
sukie red carpet dress match my table tie.
Sukie where do you think those limmericks come from.
If i had one rocky mountains canada to Argentina one rock for every double war budget and creme de lé creme prosecuted out of existsnce.
Good one one my sterling favorite,s place not to go now jack,s red church doors. Jumbo shrimp cocktail destroyer didn't even make to king of hill approach fountain of youth. Todayish best view from camera distance. Downtown Hilton.
Three hellyweird satanick masonick demonick entertainment industry created sellouts and gender inverted men sitting on a couch masquerading as women allegedly ?
Has Anyone Really Been Far Even as Decided to Use Even Go Want to do Look More Like?
Douglas Scott foreman you Michelle want easy listening version magic man heart. Papa was past tense rolling stone.
Three hellyweird satanick masonick demonick entertainment industry created sellouts and gender inverted men sitting on a couch masquerading as women allegedly ?
Wow, I remember when Char was good looking
And she doesn't remember sh!t about you.
They are all dudes
sukie 2.18 you got the look.
we made it too clorox ville.
difficult too do any more expectations 7,589 inexpensive champaign treasuries.
These women look so over this interview 😂
1:00 the cameraman was checking Susan Sarandon's package out hahahahah
“Are you driven for success?” the interviewer asks Cher. He would *never* have asked that of an accomplished man. Ditto with the money question. He treats them as though they’re unusual because they’re ambitious and successful.
I remember those times well, I was in my 30s when that movie was released. Clips like this bring back memories of what working women still faced if we dared to want to be treated as equals in the workplace. These actors have spoken elsewhere about many problems they faced on that movie, which I suspect is why Susan Sarandon makes a lot of faces in response to the questions, but doesn’t respond directly. Pfeiffer looks stoned or bored, or both. Apparently they all liked Nicholson and worked well with him, saying he wasn’t at all the problem.
Why would men and women be asked the same questions?
I don’t think males understand this film, and esp not back then.
Love these 3 ladies together 😌
I’m a guy and love this movie
mmmmh that's what a nasty sexist would say..assuming something with a wild generalisation and of course negatively portray a gender with passive agressive comment; Bravo.
Three hellyweird satanick masonick demonick entertainment industry created sellouts and gender inverted men sitting on a couch masquerading as women allegedly ?
It was written by a man named John Updike. 😂 Enjoy your slide back down the Dunning-Kruger curve!
Men understand this movie way more than you can possibly think. The movie explores feminism from a sensual perspective. The three women feel repressed as the confines of provential small town life dictate their existence. The exploration of themselves leads to the shortlisted conclusion that a man is needed to complete them. However, societal mores force them to question this dispite what is clearly their sensual nature. These women clearly identify that they need a controlling force in their life to feel secure, be it masculine energy or societal. The question then becomes, who controls, why and to what end. Darrell represents what could be seen as masculinity to the worst degree. Sophistication and wealth does not change the nature of what is clearly a repressive man. The theme here revolves around control and power. The woman eventually gain their independence uniting, but through their growth they now become an isolated force who now depend on one another. The lesson learned here was that the learning experience simply brought these woman back to where they were originally... Talking about men but being alone with eachother. Ironically, characters like fudel represent that these women still need the essence of a man present, but perhaps on a subjugated level. Keep in mind his penis is discussed earlier, a hint at the need for masculine energy, but not necessarily a sexual partner. Control again becomes the focus right up to the end.