" NEW AUTOMOBILES " AUTO INDUSTRY IN WWII & POST-WWII CAR DESIGN & MANUFACTURE 10484

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 30 чер 2024
  • Made in late 1946 or early 1947, this industrial film "New Automobiles" was produced by ABC and broadcast on that company's television network. At the time it was made, the industry was falling well short of its goals in terms of auto production, and the film seeks to explain that crisis. The film begins with a look at the wartime contribution of America's automobile industry, and then examines fitful transition back to making civilian vehicles. The film includes footage of the heads of the industry and factories of various companies including Ford, General Motors, Chrysler, Hudson, Studebaker, Willys-Overland and Packard. The film shows the complex supply chain that supports manufacture of automobiles, and underscores the need to find innovative solutions to streamline the process and allow more cars to be made.
    The film begins with shots of an auto factory during WWII producing tanks instead of cars, as well as artillery shells (2:30). Today, cars are once again being made, and the American public is interested in up to 10 million new cars. (1:35-4:02). At (4:08) a showroom is seen at a car dealer. A couple does some window shopping and then enters the dealership They talk with a salesman (4:03-5:22). An industry business meeting reveals that the production of automobiles by the industry is not meeting target goals by half (5:23-7:07). A man smokes a cigar in an office, George W. Mason of Nash - Kelvinator and head of the American Automobile Manufacturer's Association, indicates a lack of supplies is hampering production. James D. Mooney of Willys - Overland, maker of Jeep, dictates to a secretary. Chrysler president, K.P. Keller, talks to stock holders. Hudson President A.E. Barrett, speaks in front of a sign (8:21). C.E. Wilson, president of General Motors talks with two associates. Paul Hoffman, president of the Studebaker Corp. Postwar conversion of a plant from war production to production of civilian cars is now shown (7:08-9:26). Designers are shown creating streamlined new car designs (9:27-11:29). Now the film focuses on some of the raw materials that go into car production -- some of them are not what the public might think. Wheat field. A tractor, cows. Bees. African Americans harvest cotton in the fields. Sugar cane workers. Men chop rubber trees. Men chop crops, trudge through water. Piles of dirt. Iron ore mine pit. Factory at the mine pit. Animated chart shows auto mass production (11:30-13:47). A modern automobile plant assembly line. A man makes sure pieces are properly put in place, another hammers parts in. An engine block is pieced on the line. Completed engines move by a mini crane (13:48-15:37). Men use pulleys for pieces. A tire is placed into the back of a vehicle for shipment overseas. The vehicle is crated and then put on a ship, and ends up in what appears to be India where it is re-assembled. Now the film shows South American countries and other nations where raw materials are sourced for auto production. At (17:43), auto executives board a Chicago and Southern Airlines DC-3 airplane, on a tour to educate dealers about production problems. Western Union telegrams
    (15:38-18:33). Bearings, brake springs, thermostats, pistons, shafts, work gloves, paper, etc. Office staff. Logistics -- because FEDEX doesn't yet exist, important parts that are delaying production are shipped on a Capital Airlines plane (18:34-20:14). The plane comes in for a landing in Willow Run Airport in Michigan. A Fisher Body tractor trailer pulls out of the airport and heads for the highway. At a designated spot, the truck stops, removes the trailer, and another truck continues on with the urgently needed parts. Now, a long montage showing an auto factory in full operation. (20:15-23:18). Men walk into work. The truck unloads the vital parts. A factory smokestack. White hot coke is put into cars for delivery to blast furnaces. Sparks fly as steel is made. The ingot is removed from the furnace and brought by crane to the finishing mill. Metal pieces come out of a machine. Some pieces are then fed into a machine. A board that shows trim pieces (23:19-26:17). Floors are swept and shavings are recycled. The pieces are placed into a baling machine. Bales are placed onto a conveyor and then put into a furnace. Steel is drilled. A sample is examined in an auto laboratory. A test for tensile strength is performed. A Ford sedan maneuvers on a test track. A truck carries new cars including a woody type station wagon from the factory ready to be sold (26:18-29:34). The couple who want to buy a new car shake the salesman's hand and leave, having made a deal to buy a new car (29:35-30:08). End credits (30:09-30:17).
    This film is part of the Periscope Film LLC archive, one of the largest historic military, transportation, and aviation stock footage collections in the USA. Entirely film backed, this material is available for licensing in 24p HD, 2k and 4k. For more information visit www.PeriscopeFilm.com

КОМЕНТАРІ • 160

  • @loveisall5520
    @loveisall5520 Рік тому +16

    I was born in '55, a decade after V-J day. So very, very proud of our American captains of industry in war and peace. Great men. Different world.

    • @jacksons1010
      @jacksons1010 Рік тому +7

      Those captains of industry took compensation about twenty times the median pay of their workers. Today’s CEOs take about 400 times the pay of a common worker. That’s four hundred…not a typo. They pay lower taxes now than back then too. A different world indeed.

    • @michaelquinones-lx6ks
      @michaelquinones-lx6ks 2 місяці тому +1

      Unlike this stupid woke world we live in today.

  • @tjmmcd1
    @tjmmcd1 6 місяців тому +6

    So we had enough steel and iron to build 'Liberty ships', tanks, ammuntion and bombs during WW2, yet after the war, we suddenly didn't have enough steel to supply the car industries? Thanks again, for all these wonderful old films, Periscope!

  • @jimihendrix1575
    @jimihendrix1575 Рік тому +21

    Still waiting on delivery of my '47 Studebaker.

    • @user-mf7zn4ed9u
      @user-mf7zn4ed9u 4 місяці тому +3

      DONT WORRY THEY JUST FOUND A SUPPLIER OF LEFT HANDED SCREWDRIVERS & AS SOON AS THEY GET THEM IT'LL B NO LATER THAN 25 MID 26 AT THE LATEST (gotta integrate into system,train employees have to have vote on new job changes that can of stuff ..BUT 26 at latest YES SUREE!!!)🤓🤓🤓

    • @sparkplug0000
      @sparkplug0000 2 місяці тому +2

      I have an all original 1941 Chevrolet. It’s 6 volt system still starts it every time, it’s comfortable and reliable and if something does go wrong, a regular guy like me can fix it. She’ll take me anywhere I want to go, albeit at 60 mph or less. So how far have we really come in the last 83 years? Yeah, I’d hold out for that ‘47 Studebaker, it’s better than what you can buy today.

    • @toddsmith1617
      @toddsmith1617 2 місяці тому +1

      😂

    • @michaelquinones-lx6ks
      @michaelquinones-lx6ks 2 місяці тому

      @@sparkplug0000 The way they use to make them, Nowadays, its just plastic junk, Throw it away and get a new one in this throw away world we live in.

  • @fromthesidelines
    @fromthesidelines 3 роки тому +17

    The narrator, John Tillman, became WPIX-TV's news anchor [and eventually, director of news operations] in New York during the 1950's and '60s.

  • @yowpyowp7374
    @yowpyowp7374 Рік тому +16

    Aired Dec. 19, 1946 on WABD. Reviewed in the Dec. 28 issue of Billboard.

    • @cme98
      @cme98 Рік тому +6

      Most major cities or "markets" didn't even have TV stations yet in 1946. Most Americans couldn't even afford the minimum $352 ($5,240/in 2022) for the only television set they made at the time. Many manufacturers bought the RCA set to place inside finely crafted wood cabinetry because the RCA set was so ugly it was easier to sell inside furniture, pleasing the housewife, at of course a higher price for the working husband: $500 ($7,444 today) not to mention the constant maintenance it required pulling out old tubes & replacing them with new tubes in which a qualified repairman was suggested because unlike a radio where you need only unplug it before opening it up to see which tube was blown, a TV set stored electricity in high capacity & touching anything other than the top glass head of a tube could trigger an immediate discharge of 10,000 volts or more which could throw you backwards 8 feet or kill you if your other hand was touching the top of the metal frame of the TV set. Another reason why housewives wanted them inside the more expensive wood cabinetry: more husbands survived fixing the TV if it had a wood frame-vs-metal frame. Modern electronics at that time is no different than it is today, its just that it all came in a glass tube. It took another year when AT&T revolutionized electronics with the invention of the transistor which immediately brought about pocket-sized electronics powered off a battery. That is, if you worked for AT&T. The transistor would never be spoke of in American living rooms until Sony sold the first Transistor Radio here in 1957 for only $69.50 ($718 today!) it became the hottest selling consumer electronics item for the rest of the 50s & 60s. Before the transistor anything electronic which you could lift, carry, & then plug in somewhere else was considered portable. Batteries were only used to start a car or for a flashlight. The transistor took a new design of battery called the "Ever Ready Energiser" (spelled correctly) the first 9 volt battery which came free with your transistor radio "kit", but trust me you'll want to buy a 2nd battery! Which sold for: $2.50 ($25.83 today)😳 but all of that was still a full decade away. Japan was still "cleaning up" from war before they decided to clean up American pocketbooks. Consumer electronics & cars were still expensive for most Americans in 1946 when minimum wage was 40¢ an hour, equal to $5.96 today, a gallon of gas more than doubled from 9.7¢ in 1910 to 21¢ in 1946 or $3.13 today and a brand new Ford also doubled from $700 in 1910 to $1,400 in 1946 or $20,850 today. Who today can afford a Ford today even if they made a $20,850 car with minimum wage at $6/hour? Of course back then you didn't get a standard AM radio or a TV in your car or even to expect someone to fill a job at $6/hour (not to mention that wage is illegal. You'd be making far more today or...$7.50 in Texas & up to $15 in Washington state except $17.50 at the Seattle-Tacoma Airport, $16.50 in Seattle ...and that's simply to compare with minimum wages compared to the $5.96 that 1946 40¢ an hour min wage was worth, today.

    • @WitchKing-Of-Angmar
      @WitchKing-Of-Angmar Рік тому +2

      @@cme98 you worked hard to recieve quality items and purchases. I bought a 1953 Cadillac in 1953. My brother purchased a 1933 Reo in 1933. My father fished through to get a 1921 Studebaker sedan. His working pay was a dollar an hour. Approximately 16 $'s an hour in todays terms. I have nothing but up'most respect for my era...and I see to it that modern biased doesn't interrupt its natural legacy. Around 5,000,000 had a television by 1949, in 1939 a good 1,500,000. Television sold like hot cakes, the Empire state building added in a broadcasting rode in nineteen hundred and thirty five to be able to reach those with televisions and the broadcast buildings alike. You can't try to primitize a very modern era such as the 1930's and little ways into the 1940's. Its cruel and awful to speak for a time that can no longer speak for itself.

  • @K-Effect
    @K-Effect 2 роки тому +13

    Starting at 15:45 look at the beautiful almost clear lumber they're using for pallets!!!!

    • @JohnSmith-cf4gn
      @JohnSmith-cf4gn Місяць тому

      My granddaddy was a carpenter in the 30s--50s. He wouldn't use a board if it had a knothole in it. He was noted for his quality work.

    • @tomweickmann6414
      @tomweickmann6414 13 днів тому

      ​@@JohnSmith-cf4gn
      Sounds like a good solid man.
      The exact opposite of Carmela's dad in The Sopranos.
      Old goat loved to build houses out of knots.😊

  • @normsweet1710
    @normsweet1710 4 місяці тому +4

    Great brazing know how, very light weight cast iron there. We had a big cast iron pot belly stove at home, one in kitchen & one in front room

  • @cetocoquinto4704
    @cetocoquinto4704 Рік тому +7

    Priceless video

  • @moboutmen
    @moboutmen Рік тому +7

    Clemenza hated those wood bumpers. He had to wait for the Chromium ones.

  • @jeffreym.keilen1095
    @jeffreym.keilen1095 Рік тому +9

    Studebaker prided themselves with the slogan " First by far with a post war car". It is debated that Kieser-Frazer had their cars out a month before, but Studie had a completly new car for 1947.

  • @BELCAN57
    @BELCAN57 Рік тому +4

    Many of these automobile companies are no longer with us. Hudson, Nash-Kelvinator, Studebaker and Packard. All gone.

    • @user-ix1ly3hj1s
      @user-ix1ly3hj1s 4 місяці тому

      Chrysler and GM of this era are also gone. Chrysler Corporation went out of business in 1998. The French own the name now. General Motors Corporation went out of business in 2009. The Feds own the name now. Only Ford has managed to survive.

  • @Go4Corvette
    @Go4Corvette 18 днів тому

    Thank you for the history.

  • @scratchdog2216
    @scratchdog2216 Рік тому +4

    21:42 Worked in a 'Just-in-Time' shop. 'Almost-in-Time' really messed things up in the assembly areas.

  • @charlesgall7829
    @charlesgall7829 Рік тому +15

    When you could trust the explanations given for things happening in this country.

    • @mrl22222
      @mrl22222 Рік тому +4

      you do understand that this was created by the automobile manufacturers association. I would say it was an "optimistic tone" The struggles immediately post war lead to a big cash crisis for the manufacturers, and many of the smaller ones died a slow death because they could never quite catch up in terms of design and engineering. This is the equivalent of Kevin Bacon saying "all is well"

    • @charlesgall7829
      @charlesgall7829 Рік тому +10

      @@mrl22222 Agreed. But it wasn't the blatant lying that goes on today.

    • @grampy2014
      @grampy2014 Рік тому +2

      Somewhat. But not nearly as bad as today.

    • @jacksons1010
      @jacksons1010 Рік тому +3

      I can only wonder who convinced you to distrust your own countrymen, but there’s no mystery why they did the work. Small victories for those who wish ill upon America. 🇺🇸

    • @JackF99
      @JackF99 Рік тому +1

      ​@@mrl22222 Animal House!

  • @fromthesidelines
    @fromthesidelines 3 роки тому +15

    In 1947, ABC was struggling to build its television network and broadcast facilities. But they had to overcome a lack of affiliates {and there weren't that many stations on the air}, and the fact they often had to yield to DuMont, who was third behind NBC and CBS in signing up stations. In fact, ABC's flagship station in New York [WJZ-TV] wasn't completed and in operation until August 1948. Until then, they had to buy airtime on DuMont's WABD to be seen in the New York area.

    • @michaelquinones-lx6ks
      @michaelquinones-lx6ks 2 місяці тому +1

      In 1957 TV station WAAM-TV in Baltimore MD became ironically WJZ-TV.

    • @fromthesidelines
      @fromthesidelines 2 місяці тому

      ABC changed the call letters of their New York TV and radio stations from WJZ to WABC in March 1953.

  • @bobjacobson858
    @bobjacobson858 Рік тому +3

    Thanks for this wonderful, informative video. I own a couple brochures from that period (from Cadillac)--one showing war production ("Cadillac Goes To War"), and another advising dealerships to get ready to resume civilians sales, one step being to hire (or rehire) a sales force. Then the 1946 brochure touts "Improved Even More In War Than In Peace" to describe the improvements made because of the war effort. All very fascinating!

  • @elliottcarson1248
    @elliottcarson1248 Рік тому +6

    Its interesting how they were having the same supply chain problems that we're having today.

    • @turbo8454
      @turbo8454 Рік тому

      Back then for good reason........ WW2 stopped evil. Today, it's be cause of evil.........buried in government.

  • @talbotd27
    @talbotd27 Рік тому +4

    Dam man, 1-7 people was employed either directly or indirectly by the automobile industry. I highly doubt it’s anywhere near that today. That’s where a huge amount of those jobs went, when you drive through the rust belt; Detroit, Flint, Cleveland, Gary, Philadelphia, you see just endless crumbling infrastructure. It’s hard to imagine what could’ve caused so much detestation, but the automobile industry outsourcing jobs is probably largely to blame

    • @jacksons1010
      @jacksons1010 Рік тому +1

      Failure to invest in R&D and new machinery left the door open for foreign competition. Detroit was complacent when companies like VW started taking market share and had no good answer when the 1972 oil embargo caused gas prices to skyrocket. People bought Toyotas and Hondas and found them to be better built and a better value than US cars. Add in automation (robots) and there was a rapid decline in jobs making American cars. It’s going to continue, as EVs have many fewer parts and facilitate robotic assembly.

    • @michaelquinones-lx6ks
      @michaelquinones-lx6ks 2 місяці тому

      @@jacksons1010 It may come as a surprise to you, It was Studebaker that imported the Volkswagen, Which is ironic.

    • @jacksons1010
      @jacksons1010 2 місяці тому

      @@michaelquinones-lx6ks Studebaker only acted as an intermediary to import VW's into Canada. Studebaker had a lower import tariff, so they could bring in the cars and resell them to VW of Canada at a net savings to VW. No such arrangement was needed for the USA, where Volkswagen of America imported the cars directly.

    • @michaelquinones-lx6ks
      @michaelquinones-lx6ks 2 місяці тому

      @@jacksons1010 Thank you very much for answering my comments.

    • @mrdanforth3744
      @mrdanforth3744 2 місяці тому

      Unions and government had a lot to do with putting the auto industry on the bum.

  • @saxongreen78
    @saxongreen78 2 роки тому +17

    Considering how sturdy pre-WWII cars were, the attrition rate was terrible - not so in Australia...we still had T Fords and old Dodge phaetons in high circulation into the 1950s. The huge consumption of scrap steel needed for war materiel in the US meant that otherwise serviceable cars were being bought up like wildfire; Aussies, in the war from '39, stranded here in the South and still reeling from the Depression simply _needed_ to run those old bangers.

    • @bobjacobson858
      @bobjacobson858 Рік тому +6

      I guess this is somewhat like what the Cubans do today--they find ways to keep the old cars running.

    • @mrdanforth3744
      @mrdanforth3744 2 місяці тому +1

      Not only was there a shortage of cars during the war, parts were in short supply and tires and batteries nearly unobtainable. Good mechanics were mostly in the armed forces. Older model cars were run into the ground with minimal upkeep. No wonder millions of old cars were ready for replacement.

  • @Oliverdobbins
    @Oliverdobbins Рік тому +4

    Makes you want to salute and buy a DeSoto.

  • @58fins
    @58fins 3 роки тому +9

    There are a lot of 1946 Fords in this video! Most of the featured products were Ford. Interesting, eh?

    • @raybin6873
      @raybin6873 2 роки тому +2

      All companies were pretty much the same back then...I'm a Chevy guy myself but prefer 1960's - 1970's cars as I feel those were my favorite years.
      🇺🇸👍

    • @graham2631
      @graham2631 Рік тому +3

      Not surprising Ford had his own supply line

    • @8176morgan
      @8176morgan Рік тому +5

      Perhaps that was to compensate for the fact Ford was the only automobile company where clips of their chief executive were not shown in the video.

  • @clydemorgan1439
    @clydemorgan1439 Рік тому +6

    I have known about the shortages after WWII, I didn't realize it was this severe. If you are concerned about our supply chain today then watch this video, they had it worse and this only shows one industry. They got through it, why can't we and why are we so afraid that we won't be able to over come it? Are people mentally and emotionally weaker these days?

    • @moboutmen
      @moboutmen Рік тому +4

      People today are spoiled rotten.

    • @pedroalvarado9511
      @pedroalvarado9511 Рік тому +2

      Not only are people way more emotionally weaker, there Also way more physically and spiritually weaker. Back in those days people were way more self reliant they had way more useful skills and knowledge, that enabled them to get by. I would also say that back them people lived in actual communities where neighbors actually knew and helped each other out if they could. But besides these things I would say that the supply chain issue now is significantly worse as not only can we not get the natural resources required to manufacture we CANT manufacture hardly anything!!! Which we can thank our good ol fraud ass politicians for making it possible for those companies to move their production plants to China and anywhere else with cheaper labor costs. Just think about how many millions of people currently depend on welfare to survive ….. the majority of people have lost the American spirit smh it’s a sad situation!

    • @murkypuddle33
      @murkypuddle33 5 місяців тому

      look up "the marshall plan" From July 1945 through June 1946, the United States shipped 16.5 million tons of food, primarily wheat, to Europe and Japan.then from '47-'52 we spent over 200billion in aid on everyone

    • @mrdanforth3744
      @mrdanforth3744 2 місяці тому

      They didn't have DEI, diversity hires, affirmative action and "Human Resources" in those days. They could hire the best people for every job and if they couldn't hack it, get somebody else.
      Also government regulations were a lot less onerous in those days.

  • @peterparker9286
    @peterparker9286 Рік тому

    VERY GOOD. Yup the Old B4 and after war video 4 me about vehicles. But switch R Rouge in 24 hrs for Aluminum

  • @neilpiper9889
    @neilpiper9889 Рік тому +4

    They should nurse their present cars as long as possible... Good advice for 2022 with the climate change.

    • @turbo8454
      @turbo8454 Рік тому +1

      It is far more difficult (and expensive) to nurse older cars along as most have to hire the work done. The complication of newer vehicles takes many if not most owners out of the game.

  • @bigchevs1
    @bigchevs1 3 роки тому +14

    Its too bad that pre-war auto manufactures, like Preston Tucker, did not survive to the end of the war to take advantage of the demand for new cars at the end of the war. Some of us might be driving Tuckers today if so. People were looking for fresh new car designs were mostly met with 1941 models. Great video, interesting data, thank you for posting!

    • @curtislowe4577
      @curtislowe4577 3 роки тому +15

      Eh? All Tuckers were 1948 models. What I find sad is that Hudson, Nash and Studebaker did not have the volume to amortize annual style change overhead costs. Only Chrysler could compete with GM and Ford.

    • @-oiiio-3993
      @-oiiio-3993 3 роки тому +3

      @@curtislowe4577 Bingo.

    • @WAL_DC-6B
      @WAL_DC-6B 3 роки тому +6

      @@curtislowe4577 Don't forget American Motors Corp. which came about in 1954 as a result of a merger between Nash and Hudson. They managed to survive into the late 1980s until taken over by Chrysler.

    • @borandolph1267
      @borandolph1267 3 роки тому +5

      AMC was always the poor relation to the big 3. They absorbed what was left of Kaiser Frazer Jeep, and Studebaker Packard as those respective companies went under. They themselves were basically owned by Renault for their last few years of existence before Chrysler took them over.

    • @-oiiio-3993
      @-oiiio-3993 3 роки тому +5

      @@borandolph1267 AMC did not 'absorb' Studebaker Packard and did not acquire Kaiser/Jeep until 1970.
      The Studebaker-Packard merger was originally intended to meld with AMC but the deal was siderailed in 1954.
      The merger did kill Packard entirely in 1958 which was followed by Studebaker's decline and demise by 1967. Stude's assets were liquidated but the only part AMC wound up with was the General Products Division (military contracts) which had been acquired by Kaiser and thus passed to AMC with Kaiser/Jeep.
      AMC rebranded the division as AM General.
      Had the original plan succeeded with Studebaker and Packard being added to AMC in 1954, things may have turned out rather differently. www.spokesman.com/blogs/autos/2015/aug/09/collector-car-corner-demise-studebaker-packard-corporation/

  • @tomweickmann6414
    @tomweickmann6414 13 днів тому

    Opening scene.....
    "American Broadcasting Company"
    ABC, CBS, NBC had the trust and respect of the world back then.
    Today......no way.

  • @nlpnt
    @nlpnt Рік тому

    When it talks on a couple of occasions of “…substantial automobiles”, that's presumably a backhanded reference to things like Crosleys and the few small imports starting to come in (mainly at that point from “export-or-die” Britain).

  • @abevigoda3149
    @abevigoda3149 2 роки тому +3

    @17:40 Segregatonist Carleton Putnam's airline was still going on strong!

    • @jacksons1010
      @jacksons1010 Рік тому

      Delta is still doing fine, and lots less segregated now. 😈

  • @JohnSmith-cf4gn
    @JohnSmith-cf4gn Місяць тому

    Looked like my dad's new 48 Ford he bought after coming back from WW2.

  • @cme98
    @cme98 4 місяці тому +1

    When you think about the raw materials used back then compared to today cars were more “green” back then than they are today! Where today is a car made from lumber, sugar cane, rubber, wheat & other grains?

  • @tonycolca2241
    @tonycolca2241 2 місяці тому +1

    I got a 47 plymouth in 1948.

  • @LewdCustomer
    @LewdCustomer Рік тому

    The soundtrack makes me want to enlist.

  • @RivetGardener
    @RivetGardener 2 роки тому +4

    @ 30:27 : well this car is cream colored, but we wanted white. Oh honey, but it is new! OK, well it has four doors, I thought we wanted a coupe with two? Oh honey but it's new! Okay, well it....it is new and all.... Oh honey, but it's new! It rides so nice and we need it for our coming baby! OK, well, after so many years as an infantryman in Europe, yes let's get a family going...and with a new car. We'll take it! Oh Honey! Just sign here, sir.

    • @turbo8454
      @turbo8454 Рік тому +1

      Kinda like today. Everything looks the same and comes in the same three colors. Except that instead of $1500, they're now $40K plus.

  • @nickjervis8123
    @nickjervis8123 3 роки тому +4

    It has been alluded to but the US was owed millions by European allies such as the UK. Remember the Marshall Aid Plan?
    Interestingly they included A E Barritt of Hudson and G Christopher of Packard. I wonder what G Mason would have made of this?

    • @Mercmad
      @Mercmad Рік тому +4

      As an aside, The UK didn't pay off her lendlease bill until December 29, 2006, such was the enormous cost to Britain and why it remained in the doldrums,especially during the 1950's. New Zealand's on the other hand was being governed by men of vision who had the lead lease bill paid before VJ day. Such a difference to today where socialism has reduced the nations of England New Zealand to debt ridden husks of their former selves.

    • @58fins
      @58fins Рік тому +5

      @@Mercmad Remember Margaret Thatcher's famous words: "spending other people's money is great, until you run out of it".

    • @theboyisnotright6312
      @theboyisnotright6312 Рік тому

      @@Mercmad and yet the people living there love it, and are happier then the US where it's socialism for the wealthy and dog eat dog capitalism for the rest

    • @mrdanforth3744
      @mrdanforth3744 2 місяці тому

      George Mason was the first CEO they showed. He was a very smart executive who did a great job of making Nash competitive with the big 3. One reason AMC (successor to Nash) lasted the longest of the independent car companies.

  • @65gtotrips
    @65gtotrips 8 місяців тому

    That’s so interesting that customers were accepting delivery without back seats and or bumpers.

    • @mrdanforth3744
      @mrdanforth3744 2 місяці тому

      Many cars were delivered with black painted wooden 2X6 bumpers and a spare wheel with no spare tire. There were coupons in the glove compartment, and the dealer notified the owner as soon as his bumpers and tire came in. Customers were happy to get a car of any kind.
      Think of it, if there was a shortage of tires they could turn out 20% more cars if they left off the spare tire and the steel and chrome for bumpers could be used elsewhere.

  • @TheManLab7
    @TheManLab7 Рік тому +1

    18:33 Were they "gamet" bearing's from the UK by any chance? As they were the world best bearings.

  • @65gtotrips
    @65gtotrips 8 місяців тому +1

    Imagine getting your car in a crate to be put together like a barbecue grill !

    • @mrdanforth3744
      @mrdanforth3744 2 місяці тому

      That is a CKD or completely knocked down unit. They were shipped to foreign distributors who had their own mini factory where they assembled the cars then sent them off to their dealers.

  • @Ricken2022
    @Ricken2022 Рік тому +5

    The furniture company I worked for stopped production, and had all women making shell boxes for the war .

  • @OsbornTramain
    @OsbornTramain 5 місяців тому

    It's funny, not all the car companies participated in helping ABC make this film, Crosley, Kaiser-Frazer and Checker were not in the credits.

    • @mrdanforth3744
      @mrdanforth3744 2 місяці тому

      I did see the name "Frazer" on a big sign in the airplane scene. Coincidence or did it have a connection to the Frazer company? They didn't really get going producing cars until 1947, they may not even have been in business when this film was made.

  • @plunkervillerr1529
    @plunkervillerr1529 Рік тому +1

    Supply and demand, the lifes bleed of industry then and now .

  • @aaronwilliams6989
    @aaronwilliams6989 Рік тому +2

    Notice. No robots.

  • @JoeBob1955
    @JoeBob1955 Рік тому +3

    Arrgh! It's AFFECTING, not EFFECTING!

  • @jagboy69
    @jagboy69 3 роки тому +7

    I was born 60years too late. 🤣

    • @MrMenefrego1
      @MrMenefrego1 3 роки тому +7

      An entire generation of Americans were born six decades too late, myself included. Thanks, in large part, to the ever so brilliant plans of U.S. manufacturers to send production to other nations like China. They actually reasoned that by sending manufacturing jobs overseas their products would be cheaper for American citizens to purchase, okay that much is true. The only problem with that plan is that when you send the ''cost saving'' jobs overseas you also remove the ability for Americans to buy those very same cheaper goods because they no longer have those jobs which they sent overseas which they needed to buy those products! Oops! I do believe there was a flaw in those plans. 👀

  • @GenerallyGeneralLee
    @GenerallyGeneralLee Рік тому +1

    Sounds like 2022.

  • @65gtotrips
    @65gtotrips 8 місяців тому

    @6:44 Well that’s because in WWI, America wasn’t the ‘arsenal of democracy’ for the entire world as it was in WWII. Plus WW2 was way bigger, over the entire world Vs. WWI being in Europe. Thus materials and manufacturing was way greater.

  • @toddsmith1617
    @toddsmith1617 2 місяці тому

    Did they charge way over MSRP?

    • @mrdanforth3744
      @mrdanforth3744 2 місяці тому

      Yes many dealers did charge a premium over list price. It's hard to blame them when they had been starving for 4 years. It took until early 1949 before the shortage was finally over.

  • @anthonybelyea1964
    @anthonybelyea1964 Рік тому

    Almost sounds like today people want cars and there's nothing at the dealer place an order and wait a year or two

    • @texaswunderkind
      @texaswunderkind Рік тому

      My employer needed to replace part of their fleet last year, and the buyers couldn't find trucks in stock anywhere. There was a huge backlog of orders. It was rough. I don't know what they did, because they had to book the orders in that budget year. I guess they just ordered and waited.

  • @johnchildress6717
    @johnchildress6717 Рік тому +2

    Can,t even look at something like this without the jab coming up in the comments.Weirdos.

  • @ralphcorsi741
    @ralphcorsi741 3 роки тому +5

    He keeps talking about shortages but he doesn’t say why there are shortages. The war is over there should be plenty of steel and everything else available. I think the cause lies in the government. War materiel restrictions have not been removed. Why not?

    • @backblaise1255
      @backblaise1255 3 роки тому +7

      The USA suffered less from shortages than any other major combatant, and indeed supplied and helped feed its Allies during, and ex-enemies after, the war; but it still had to restrict civilian manufacture of almost everything. Afterwards it had to decide what the priorities were and organise allocations, and that's a big job. I'd also suggest tools, nails and screws, pots and pans and many other things were more important than automobiles.

    • @ralphcorsi741
      @ralphcorsi741 3 роки тому +4

      @@backblaise1255 It is not the job of the US Government to decide what priorities and allocations should be made in a peace time economy. Unless, they were the Soviet Union. Then the governments job would be to decide what would be produced and the amount that would be produced. That is because the Soviets had a central planning economy, with a five year plan, that would dictate the number of cars, toasters and refrigerators that would be produced. Demand in that kind of economy is guesswork. In an open economy, which the US economy mostly is in peace time, the customers create the demand and the manufacturers respond to that demand. The wartime restrictions should have ended immediately and should not have been dragged on waiting for a technocrat to make the decision. A good example of continuing wartime restraints would be the UK. They continued rationing until 1954. While Germany was recovering and developing into a productive nation again, England was still rationing bacon. Until the Conservative party took over in 1954, England was still in the throes of a wartime economy. People are better at determining what they want then any Central Planning Committee.

    • @backblaise1255
      @backblaise1255 3 роки тому +6

      @@ralphcorsi741 It was not a peacetime economy! The US Government had more 'socialist like' control over it's economy during WWII than any other Government apart from the USSR and the UK. Moving from wartime socialist control to peacetime capitalist laissez-faire had to be done with care to avoid massive inflation, stagnation and possible collapse.

    • @ralphcorsi741
      @ralphcorsi741 3 роки тому +4

      @@backblaise1255 When you want and need a car and there are only two available, that is inflationary. What solves it is higher production, i.e. more products. The govt was preventing more products being produced by holding back materiel. There was four years of pent up demand for just about everything and that does not lead to stagnation, it leads to growth. The war is over, soldiers are coming back and getting married at the highest rate in history. Have you heard of the Baby Boom? These married couples needed toasters, cars, beds, clothing, furniture, and appliances. I see no collapse there. Where are you getting your economic understanding? You need to read Economics in One Lesson by Henry Hazlitt.

    • @mikebeard8505
      @mikebeard8505 3 роки тому +8

      The first 4 replies are right on target.....no instant gratification .....the mass of a war time economy was slow to change directions....it would seem slow to those of us that expect and get everything we want instantly. No conspiracies .... Just reality.

  • @CrownOfGoldCompleatSacrifice_2

    Until they left for a cheaper option leaving Detroit a waist land and rinse and in every country we’re cheep labor was the only thing they cared about

  • @juaneduardobravosunega3026
    @juaneduardobravosunega3026 3 роки тому +1

    La biblia dise todo hombre que nase es industria

  • @donkeyboy585
    @donkeyboy585 7 місяців тому

    People had to “nurse” their 5 year old cars 😂

    • @STho205
      @STho205 2 місяці тому

      Most people had endured a 12 year global Great Depression prior to the war consumer car shutdown.
      Average automobile in 1946 was a mid 30s with a lot of Model As and some Ts and Pierce Arrows still on the road from the 20s.
      But as milling was rather large tolerances in that era, most cars had about a 10 year good service life...and often that was only putting 5000 miles a year on the car and only one car a family.

  • @jeffreysheridan5205
    @jeffreysheridan5205 2 місяці тому +1

    That 46 Packard was a dog.

  • @LucasChoate
    @LucasChoate 8 місяців тому

    7:15 This dude looks like the stereotypical "fatcat".

  • @raybin6873
    @raybin6873 2 роки тому +11

    Bet dollars to donuts those truckers blocking traffic on Canadian border bridge would've never happened in this time period. Americans wouldn't have tolerated that kind of crap. And - if the covid pandemic occurred then you know damn well every citizen would've stepped up to get vaccinated. America had a soul back then...sad we live in such crappy times today.
    🇺🇸

    • @booklover6753
      @booklover6753 2 роки тому +5

      So true my friend. Illiteracy combined with a lack of a sense of civic duty have brought us to this point. Maybe illiteracy isn't only responsible. Gullibility plays a role also, thus the rise of Fox news.

    • @sheehy933
      @sheehy933 Рік тому +1

      You leave a lot of history out in your comment. Mainly the history of government breaking its contract with its citizens on many issues over the decades. Back then it went without saying that those in powerful positions worked to keep the U.S. strong, and for the most part you could trust them at their word. Can you say the same about the last 3, 4, or 5 decades ? The destruction of a manufacturing economy with good middle class jobs and the implementation of a service economy, the weakening of our Constitution and Bill of Rights, the power of the military industrial complex which Eisenhower warned about, the outright lying to the American people, and over the last 10 years or so the absolutely absurd, vulgar, immoral push of their "woke" agenda.
      No, I won't be lining up for any vaccines just because the government says so. They long ago lost their right to govern, to be trusted.
      So don't push anti Americanism on the people when it is the government itself that is anti American.

    • @braniganblue3460
      @braniganblue3460 Рік тому

      @@booklover6753 Leave it to a couple of liberals to somehow work covid, politics, and their hatred of Fox news into an automotive video.

    • @new2000car
      @new2000car 11 місяців тому

      @@booklover6753you voted for biden, didn’t you?

    • @STho205
      @STho205 2 місяці тому

      Did you catch Covid?

  • @rongreen8962
    @rongreen8962 Рік тому

    This film depicts a huge bubble of production and consumption, filled by cheap credit and environmental damage, that has now burst. No politician of any party is gonna get elected talking about that.

    • @STho205
      @STho205 2 місяці тому

      Consumerism is much higher today than in 1946...and until this administration credit interest was very low. It is still lower than it was in the late 70s through the 90s.
      Query:
      in a family of 4,
      how many telephones ate there then and now?
      How many automobiles?
      How many appliances?
      How many personal entertainment devices like radio/TV or record player/streaming device?
      How many people go to tuition schools and colleges today vs 1946...or 1956?
      How many people own two suits or sets of office or dress clothes that last several years.....vs new clothes much more often and much more redundant.

    • @rongreen8962
      @rongreen8962 2 місяці тому

      @@STho205 I’m not denying that consumption is higher now than in past decades, but my point is that the extreme post-WW2 growth in American consumerism not only offloaded its costs onto poor people around the world and onto the environment, but also created momentum for the “American Dream” that continues today in the promises of politicians and the profits of corporations and banks.
      Anyone who is thoughtful and pays attention to this stuff realizes the dream is dead, and keeping 8 billion humans in comfort and convenience is just insanity.

  • @daver9024
    @daver9024 Рік тому +3

    Was biden in office when this was shot?