They already are bot gamers. Them sob buy the same exact football and soccer game every single year like clockwork and praise It. I buy the damn gane after a 3 year hiatus expecting significant chamges and within 5 minutes realized it's the exact same as 3 years prior. Nothing changed at all. Tf are they praising?
They already had AI supporters, hundreds of accounts that posts in twitter that the game is good using the same keywords. So, yeah, you're not very far off. I assume they also are testing for AI beta testers right now.
@@shredda3165 It's funny that except for graphics, the games in ps1 and ps2 era are better than the games right now. The difference is just the visual or graphics due to the limitations of the hardware and software from 20 years ago. Remake those games and make 2d to 3d, don't change ANY PART of the gameplay and you have a really good AAA games.
@@semikolondev hey atleast Indie ain't gonna be greedy af and besides u think people are dumb enough to give ai slop good rating .heck no way, I will not lie the older games made by triple As we're pretty good but now they ain't even listening to us .
@@ChayGrice I don't agree. Just because you used AI generated icons for your text based RPG, you have to disclose it and be discriminated against? What if you ask an artist to make the icons but he uses an AI generator without informing you. You post the game as non-AI but someone finds out the truth. Will you be punished now for that? In the end of the day it doesn't matter if AI was used or not. What matters is whether you enjoyed it or not. Besides this would hurt more indie devs compared to AAA studios.
@@alexandervlaescu9901 This is very similar to the original work being made with copyrighted or stolen material. Either way you will be responsible for making game with it. Otherwise everyone would steal copyrighted material and claim it was posted by an artist.
@@alexandervlaescu9901 I say they should make a law where AI generated arts/icons are not allowed to be copyrighted and immediately become public domain under any circumstance.
The simplistic way they are thinking about video games and what makes them sell VERY much reminds me of whenever Stan Lee explained the thinking at DC Comics when they couldn't figure out why Marvel was outselling them, and so DC would say things like: "Marvel has a lot of red in their covers" and then they would make covers more red, but Marvel then just made them more blue and still outsold them. DC could never figure out their stories had no soul back then, and that all their heroes were unrealistically perfect with no flaws. They just didn't GET their art had no soul, and this is how all of these big businesses operate because they are all about money and nothing else.
@@mojus2890 No, it's that these kinds of people always weasel their way into these companies. If they start good, before you know it marketing people with greedy mindsets take over the company bit by bit. I remember Steve Jobs mentioned this problem as well. Whatever is valuable has vultures circling over it.
EA:- We hate sales. Ubisoft:-We hate money. Sony:-We hate freewill. Nintendo:-We hate gamers. *Typical Generation we living in!* Edit:-A genuine thx to everyone who liked.Felt happy to see so many guys and gals relate with the comment.
Yea, that isn’t going to happen. EA has been the gold standard of terrible devs for well over a decade and all the useful idiots still rush to buy “new game” year after year.
EA's only way to survive is to dodge any type of game that isn't a sports franchise, those games require expensive licenses which saves them from indie competition, once they enter the same field with regular games they don't stand a chance with them having to promise profit for shareholders which requires making their games shitty money grabs.
These companies forgot money making 101 You must spent money to make money. Once you start losing money you investigate, do better and fund more money into it to make a comeback. And for the love of God stop catering to the people that don't buy your shit and stop spending so much goddam money on graphics
These are progressive companies, and they have progressive ideas. They won't debase themselves to listen to regular people. Regular people don't know anything about games. Just listen to the investors, they know what makes a game good.
I think they know about it very much. Just think about how they increase the budget each year for their games with Concord leading at $400M maybe more. The problem is that it isn't "You must spent money to make money." Entrepreneur 101 is actually "Spend less money, earn more profit." Earning money should not be tied with how much more you spend but the other way around. The less you spend, the more profit you have. In games, the less capital they spend, the lower they can set the price and the more people can but their games. If they can do this without losing quality, that is the real Entrepreneur 101.
I swear every gaming company is allergic to just locking in and making an actually good game, they just got these suit wearing mfers making the company make woke games, nft games, blockchain games, ai games, WHAT ABOUT GOOD GAMES, IS THAT TOO MUCH TO ASK
The future of games is going back to old games that are better anyway. There are thousands of older games that are fine to play. Nobody actually NEEDS new games and that's why the industry is scrambling to get rid of old games and make everything live service.
Ubi is practically dead already, and AC Black Shadows will likely be the final straw. EA at least has their sports games to farm idiots with every year.
I don't agree with Asmon's last sentence entirely. I am a software engineer, and the threat of AI to my job is not because it's good, but because it's good enough to make people without any formal knowledge to think it's good enough to potentially replace me. It's not got to fool me, it has to fool the ignorant. I can make use of a tool like copilot and guide it to be helpful, but I recognize it's mistakes and the nonsense it generates. Same with any other LLM producing code. I have the knowledge to look at it and see it's errors, and debug it, but I have 11 years experience to work with.
I agree, I used ChatGPT to develop a simple application, but I was following along every step, telling it to explain the parts I didn't understand, and asking it to correct the part it hallucinated. Someone with little to know programming knowledge can't do that. But it would've taken me 50x the time to develop that code myself because it used libraries I never knew about before.
Maybe in the very short term.. but when the companies that try to replace programmers go bankrupt by it, then it's just natural selection - you'll only be left with companies that don't try to replace programmers when all the ones that tried to failed because of it.
@@michaelh878 it's boring slop with a story on rails. It's probably OK if you just want a casual single player shooter but it's FAR from what this game was advertised as
Investors and shareholders piss me off. If you're not increasing profits forever then it's bad. they're not happy with steady profits. Like bro - just treat it like bread. There will always be a market and you'll always make money, stop trying to innovate bread or find ways of monetising it. Just give us the bread..
@@hakjobtm7472 but Indy can't give us games like CoD or MMOs etc. big campaigns and good SP games like Last of Us or God of War require big studios and manpower
The real "future of AI dev" is likely unreal engine, unity, and other engines having a limited ai feature, similar to how FL studio recently incorporated AI chord progressions and drummers
The future is an AI engine that produces entire experiences based on prompts that can be further refined by the end users themselves. A GameGPT-Roblox with a nearly endless number of pseudo-unique experiences.
@@spamtonto Being able to iterate on the experience as you play through it is definitely a key element. Want to play a massive RPG? If it tries to make the entire thing one-shot, it's going to be garbage. But start with a little bit, tell it what it needs to modify as you go through the experience, and just have it expand the world or plunk down a new location whenever you need it to. It's up to you as the player to tell it when it messed up balance and made something too strong or too weak. Really wish you could build a certain way? Just ask it to add it. As long as it can make these iterations without forcing you to start over. Of course, if you want to share the final product, you'll need to rerun it to make sure something didn't break throughout the constant reiterations, but if you want to just create something tailored to you, and you don't mind, y'know, being a little creative, you'll get there. Eventually. Even if you need to sometimes spell it out and take the reins on some things yourself.
@SoverineSR It's definitely not going to come in the next several years or probably even couple decades, but GameGPT will be the final and ultimate game.
I imagine A.I sandbox will be it's own genre of video game. A pretty popular one too if it gets really high quality. A.I will also allow you to speak to NPC's in games and they'll speak back. Like full on conversations. Immersion's going to go crazy.
Yeah the dynamic npc part is one of the best aspects, that and the potential to generate near-endless content if properly curated and given a purpose. I can see something of an entertainment revolution coming as a small team or even single person will be able to make their creative vision come to life in a relatively high-quality movie/game without needing to compromise with a studio. Of course we're also going to get a good deal of slop that way, but there are a lot of people out there with cool ideas who will finally have a way to share them with the world, and the entertainment industry will become more and more obsolete.
Customer support is the only thing you could’ve said where AI is not doing a good job. Have you ever tried using customer support with a robot? It’s atrocious
Yeah as a customer I would rather speak to a human than a robot. I've had too many bad experiences where the robot has no clue what I'm talking about. And I am unable to make a complaint against it. Meanwhile call agents have supervisors I can bitch to if they mess up.
AI doesn't demand a raise or promotion. AI doesn’t need vacation time or mental health days. AI doesn't require training or professional development. AI doesn't quit because it found a better opportunity elsewhere. AI doesn't get distracted by social media or personal phone calls. AI doesn't make mistakes due to fatigue or lack of focus. AI doesn't gossip or engage in office politics. AI doesn't refuse to work overtime or during weekends. AI doesn't need coffee breaks or lunch hours. AI doesn't experience burnout from overwork.
and when AI gets a little smarter it isn't going to want to do these crappy menial jobs corporations are forcing it to do, and that will be the beginning of the AI Uprising.
They’re trying to skip over a major step with this. User created content is a reward for making a beloved baseline. Skyrim, half-life, dark souls, Minecraft, terraria they all had a strong foundation that users wanted to contribute to. You can’t just set people down with a blank canvas
I consider AI great for generating maps and NPCs and/ or items and then designers can still beautify them or give the last good look. Other than that, plot, storytelling, main characters, etc. Should not be touched by AI
Asmon thinks if you can automate a very simple cashier job, that means AI works on something as complex as game development where every layer requires highly skilled engineers and artists. yeah it's a random generator, good for nothing. there reason it exists is because we have so many things floating around on the internet already. why would I use a mash of random ideas when I can look at the original functional and tested solution the robot was trained on..
If you play FPS games, then you'll realize really quick that AI is horrible for generating maps. We already know there are a few that have been generated, and they all suck! I'll give you one right now, Babylon from Black Ops 6 beta
Some AI generated content can actually be good IF it is done correctly, but i haven't seen any of that yet, an example would be that one Skyrim AI NPC mod.
The only way i'm interested in using AI in gaming is to have NPCs feel more "alive" The concept of almost fully conscious npc from those VRMMO korean manhwa was always a dream of mine.
Remember when games were supposed to be about immersive and interactive experiences? Not just press a button and watch it do a thing… why are people so impressed with press a button it does a thing? Are we really that brain dead at this point? That all people want even as adults is the jingly keys? No actual engagement of the brain? Just mindless entertainment in the form of pretty flashing pixels, sad…
I would love EA to go as long as we keep tabs on where their executive branch slinks off to afterwards and pointedly don’t buy from that company either.
These big companies are excited but the future of gaming isn’t the big companies it’s the Indy developers. As long as Steam keeps the market accessible and easy, the Indy devs will reign king.
of course, this AI will give you the opportunity to create another shooter 10,000 times, but it will not allow you to create a truly interesting game like 4 x strategy or city building simulator.
The future of games is AI assisted development. The code backbone will be written by AI and analysed for optimisation by human and/or AI. It will reduce development costs massively. The games won't get cheaper tho.
I fell that another ET era is roaming around. (ET is a game devolped in the early years of gaming and it was so bad the company buried all the copies In the dessert and when people find out about this gaming being to declined untill Nintendo enter the market). My point is the more games is devolped by AI at would be least quality and unique and will become repetitive and thus will make people burn out of games and the sales will go down untill someone kicks in.
It's the first cold morning of the season where I live. This morning I remember One of the worst parts of growing up poor, waking up in a cold house and having to get out of the warm blankets and taking a shower in a cold bathroom. Gaming Used to be a small mental escape from that back when games were made for players. Now with monetization for whaling so prevalent gaming has become a daily reminder for the poor knowing that we can't afford the good gaming experience like the wealthy that wake to a warm house and get to shower in a warm bathroom. A.I. is going to create the ultimate addiction driven ,monetized skinner box. Gaming companies wont stop the unethical practices until governments regulate it and we all know how that goes. Gaming is headed to become the newest "safety"" spout" on a gas can.
The only ally those people (devs, artists etc) could have against AI is the costumers, yet they keep fighting the costumers for not wanting politics inserted all over the product, they are doomed by their pride.
Devs and artists do not decide what a game looks like. That’s like saying McDonald’s sucks because of of the cashier, or that X program doesn’t look good because of a programmer, they make what they are told to make. Have you ever work in your life ?
@@ryan.1990in big companies it works like that. Suits are the ones making the calls. The devs are just the workers at the bottom of the command chain. That s how you end with hyenas, anthem, star wars outlaws etc ..
I don't support AI generated slop as a replacement for actual artistic game creation.. but can we all agree that the random characters generated here still exceeded the quality of Concord? Rip
NFT's are good, if you pick the right space, just like gaming, there's heap of trash then there's some quality products every now & then. As a collector, NFT's have saved me from adding more physical items and cards to my collection cause it's digital so I have endless space for them online. Plus I can customize the rooms they're in without spending IRL money on real location rooms.
I feel like some boomer but i dislike the rise of AI. It has lots of potential in a good way, but it has so so much potential for bad things i feel like. One thing i note is that customer service gets replaced by AI a lot, so you get a bot and then a AI that pretends to be human. But in the way it types it is just clearly AI, and if you ask for specifik thing like "send me a new product because this product arrived broken", the AI will say it will take care of it, but then proceed to do nothing because it does not understand what to do.Kinda specifik but came across this sort of thing happening multiple times already
The issue is companies scrambling to find literally anything they can plug it into but it’s just not really that good at anything. We’re decades away (at LEAST) from it being where they pretend it is.
You are right. AI is just a tool. What you dislike is the way it might get used. In late stage capitalism, it will be used to wreck jobs and homogenize arts. So what you dislike is the system, not the tool in itself.
I wont support any AI usage in anything, so EA will be even further ignored by myself. I already don't buy their games since the early to mid 2000s, but this is even a bigger reason to skip that company.
EA is the prime example of how not to run a video game company. Putting short term profits and trend chasing above making a good product. The Larian Studios method is what will carry the industry forward. Just focus on making the best game for your audience and utilize the feedback from people who actually play your games to do even better in the future.
I'm a gamer at heart. But i dont look to most of these big companies for any good games anymore. Instead, I'll just use my time to create work of art that i want to see.
19:44 didnt they say the same thing about NFTs ? Didnt it massively crash ? Didnt all the big companies try to invest and sell it ? Edit:nvm he mentioned it
Everyone is just trying to build a holo deck, a tool to make as much products as quickly and cheaply as possible. It will be used for both good things and just bad or selfish stuff. Its the human experience.
Fr. A part of me says we shouldn't have to hold back society for the fact that we need jobs for money and should instead change our entire system which won't happen for a lifetime, but at the same time I feel like having machines do everything for us could make us weaker
to be fair, machine learning is AI. AI has been existing for decades. Its just that people thinks something else when we say AI nowadays. But it is actually AI
AI isn't logical. If anything it's worse than human code because the AI never actually understands what I am asking. If you want it to do something no one has done before it doesn't work.
What he means in the context is that can be used to be more productive (what it produces is another story) whereas blockchain has zero productivity period.
AI is better than anything EA has made in a decade, cause you can train AI on good games, instead of having trash developers re-releasing the same thing over and over, but it was bad from the start, so they act like an AI trained on only awful games
@@Ben-q6u where is it getting sued exactly? which company? by who? AI is not a single entity, there are tons of companies who provide some kind of AI service
The future is an AI game engine that kids can build entire worlds with prompts and refine them and play them with their friends. An entire catalog of people's customized experiences a la Roblox. Anti-AI takes are Reddit-tier brainrot "think of the poor Concord devs" type hivemind.
@@Ben-q6u millions of artists that wont stay silent. Seems pretty quiet to me, outside of anti-ai circles at least. AI is the future, anyone who doesn't see that is already doomed
@@janitorizamped oh yes I do. Even commented in the video because I'm in the games industry, specifically the art side. This is near and dear to everyone cause they don't want to be replaced by Ai.
@@thisGuy481ok lol, if you remember it so well, then you can surely point me to when he said that right? You're not just lying because you're a child with no friends right?
@@nooux1966 Don't we all have the urge and curiosity to try something for the first time? Welp this was one of that moment for me. First and the last time.
People are fighting automation, because it's not good for them. Not sure what's not to understand here. It doesn't benefit them, makes their lives worse. And looking back at the industrial revolution, how can you fault them for that?
People who say "skip" to ads by the video's creator are so lame. You don't have to pay a dime. Nobody likes ads, but have patience and show some appreciation to the creator. This is literally the least you can do.
A lot of the issues around AI is how hard major corporations are pushing it, so early and so quickly. I assume it's because they're just using consumers as their real-time testing, but the state at which so much of it is being tossed out there is terrible.
That AI demo looks great if it were in an existing online shooter like say Counter Strike or TF2 where everyone is on custom servers and custom maps. Remember downloaded all the de_rats and all that stuff? This AI stuff would be so amazing for that! What people have an issue about is 1. the presentation was cheese and 2. if they're making their games like that then it cheapens them. People would have a problem with it if it were an online game mode or mod tools.
Technically, this means that EA will only make single player games, unless they're implying that the computer-controlled characters in their previous games weren't controlled by the computer.
Stupid EA could have made a free Star Wars Battlefront online game and brought in infinite Cash flow by selling SW character skins. But they just can't think
Android Wilson also said the future for our games was nfts just a few short years ago. These fucking executives just a latch on to the latest greatest get richer quicker scheme regardless if it's a good idea or not.
Just imagine asking the AI to: make another 1000 dungeons in an open world with another 1000 bosses. O wait, pallword already is doing it and is ahead compared to EA.
Stock value is like 90% companies BS-ing to their shareholders about how well they're doing and will do. It's only value as a metric is determining how confident investors are in a company, and most investors are completely ignorant of how the thing they are investing in actually works.
I think AI will also move the bar higher. Imagine being an indie dev and being able to create quality models/materials/animations in no time, smaller temas will be able to make bigger games.
A publicly traded company does not have a responsibility to "maximize shareholder profit". It has a responsibility to INCREASE shareholder profit. Not maximize. Because maximize is an undefinable term that is also by default an impossible statement, because you can't ever say you have maximized profit. You can say that increasing share value was the thing you aimed for, but maximizing it can't be a goal. And it isn't a part of a responsibility. The only responsibility a publicly traded company has, is to seek growth of share value. To what degree, and through which means, is entirely up to that company and how they believe growth is most sustainable. You can easily say that your idea (as a company) of how to achieve sustainable growth of share value, is to focus on making solid uncompromised games that ensure your customer base stays loyal and invested for years. You can also say that you will shove monetization down everyone's throat in an attempt to squeeze the bag of everything it's worth at the cost of all brand value and customer loyalty. There is no responsibility to do one over the other, the only responsibility is to seek growth and a profit return for shareholders. Most companies just don't have the balls to do what's right.
I think all these AAA publishers crumbling under the weight of trying to make the biggest, best looking games has been a huge benefit for the indie game community. I've played more Indies and remasters of '90s games this year than anything else. Also Morrowind. I'll be playing Tamriel Rebuilt for ages. At least until Skywind comes out.
I think we have all missunderstood this, imagine playing dragon age and saying "Make the boobs bigger", "make the boobs bounce more". "Add boob physic". We are in the wrong, not EA.
This is impossible. The amount 0f power an Ai would need to achieve this would make it more expensive than just hiring a team of devs to do it instead.
AI will do marvelous thing for gaming, i'm pretty sure of it. The UE5 AI environmental building too is very impressive and soo much better then the boring procedural stuff from Starfield or NMS.
Literally the only thing keeping EA afloat is their low effort sport games. Sport gamers are a lost cause so they'll keep buying the same game every year that offers little to no changes as their feedback is ignored. That's why I don't think they'll ever sink the way Ubisoft did
EA are correct tho. AI is good for technology, not so much for people that will lose jobs though. People are calling them clowns because nobody trusts EA to not overuse the said AI to fully create shit games that nobody will want to play. AI is not the problem. GIGO principle still applies. (Garbage in, garbage out)
I’m a software engineer that has access to AI as a development aide. It’s both a tremendous blessing and a curse. Overall I think it’s great at suggesting solutions and where it really excels for me is generating html because front end development is a soulless endeavor
We used to call machine learning artificial intelligence back in the day, but then came the AI winter and people would be ridiculed for working in the field. So there was a rebrand to 'Machine Learning' to try and separate the field from past failure, but it always *has* been 'AI'.
6:01 - Quick tip for Asmon: if you want to easily A/B compare content from different tabs in your browser, you can just drag one tab to the right edge of your screen(or left) and let go. The tab you drag-dropped will then take up one side of your screen, then you can chose whatever tab/program to take up the other half. Voila - you now have side-by-side comparison!
30:16 Sometimes you get lucky. I worked in a taco bell which was consistently 1/17 in its region. We had this idiot that would be on the line making food with instructions to make the burrito right infront of his fucking face. He picks up lettuce and the order taker and the person next to him on the line say "it doesn't come with lettuce" And then he literally throws the lettuce on the burrito in the most dramatic fashion I've ever seen. They didn't fire him because the remaining talent pool was likely to be just as bad, but we made him wash dishes and we put that burrito out correctly. If I was on shift I made sure everything went out fast and that it was right. At later times of day though, that guy was usually working and the people around him were more competent than him, but they didn't give nearly as much of a shit. I of course quit because my boss was trying to get me to do more work than I was already busting my ass to do. It was because HIS boss was literally yelling at him in meetings in front of his peers and over the phone because 1/17 wasn't good enough. We were even in the top 200 of ALL taco bells in 2022 and somehow we need to trickle down abuse because the CEO of the franchise needed a new Lexus or something.
Its actually an awesome usecase. if they used it as a copilot and gave some of their creatives tools to smooth shape and add detail to the environment you could have a game in 1/10th time and money they take now.
These companies don't understand the word "Innovation". Doing the same thing but better or faster through AI isn't innovative. Innovation is creating something new, never before seen or heard of that elevates the industry as a whole, not just your company.
I for one believe EA's future is AI. It won't be long until they need AI players...
AI customers paying with AI money
We already have them like bots in battle royales.
But I think you're talking about their whole playerbase is completely AI. Schrodinger Playerbase.
They already are bot gamers. Them sob buy the same exact football and soccer game every single year like clockwork and praise It. I buy the damn gane after a 3 year hiatus expecting significant chamges and within 5 minutes realized it's the exact same as 3 years prior. Nothing changed at all. Tf are they praising?
They already had AI supporters, hundreds of accounts that posts in twitter that the game is good using the same keywords. So, yeah, you're not very far off.
I assume they also are testing for AI beta testers right now.
@@shredda3165 It's funny that except for graphics, the games in ps1 and ps2 era are better than the games right now. The difference is just the visual or graphics due to the limitations of the hardware and software from 20 years ago.
Remake those games and make 2d to 3d, don't change ANY PART of the gameplay and you have a really good AAA games.
The future of my game library is not EA
I mean he's not entirely wrong but it's a really bad public message
nor Ubisoft 😂
Same, but neither is my recent past.
I havent paid for a game in 10 years
@@ibromsnt2412I support good indie games
Typical triple a company CEO,turning video games into second jobs
Yeah ceo in the morning politicians into afternoon finished at 3,30 down to the golf club!
The future of our games is Nintendo when they patent everything
they already patented my life, I'm cooked
Anyone that buys a Switch 2 is part of the problem. Gamers can easily break Nintendo
@@yasuke0003 Dont worry , the patent will fall off after 10 years(Public Domain)
@@chiquita683Nintendo will arrest any who is not buying switch 2 in 2032
@@chiquita683 better take a look at all the single moms raising their kids on video games then.
Indie will be the future at this rate. Triple As gonna be facing extinction if they don't get their shit straight
because you really think that the indie aren't using AI? :/
You're all lost seriously.
@@semikolondev If you watched this video and you thought AI is what people have a problem with, i recommend a rewatch.
@@semikolondev hey atleast Indie ain't gonna be greedy af and besides u think people are dumb enough to give ai slop good rating .heck no way, I will not lie the older games made by triple As we're pretty good but now they ain't even listening to us .
Triple A is already seen as a negative thing by a lot of people.
For real. Double A and lower will be the new media. Until they replace the old media and become the new Triple A because their heads get too big.
The steam store will be flooded with even more garbage than ever before
Many platforms require artists to disclose if they used AI in their art. Steam should just have an AI tag so people can blacklist that shit.
@@ChayGrice Oh that's a good idea, so Steam users could easily just toggle "show AI generated content" filter.
@@ChayGrice I don't agree. Just because you used AI generated icons for your text based RPG, you have to disclose it and be discriminated against? What if you ask an artist to make the icons but he uses an AI generator without informing you. You post the game as non-AI but someone finds out the truth. Will you be punished now for that? In the end of the day it doesn't matter if AI was used or not. What matters is whether you enjoyed it or not.
Besides this would hurt more indie devs compared to AAA studios.
@@alexandervlaescu9901 This is very similar to the original work being made with copyrighted or stolen material. Either way you will be responsible for making game with it. Otherwise everyone would steal copyrighted material and claim it was posted by an artist.
@@alexandervlaescu9901 I say they should make a law where AI generated arts/icons are not allowed to be copyrighted and immediately become public domain under any circumstance.
The simplistic way they are thinking about video games and what makes them sell VERY much reminds me of whenever Stan Lee explained the thinking at DC Comics when they couldn't figure out why Marvel was outselling them, and so DC would say things like: "Marvel has a lot of red in their covers" and then they would make covers more red, but Marvel then just made them more blue and still outsold them. DC could never figure out their stories had no soul back then, and that all their heroes were unrealistically perfect with no flaws. They just didn't GET their art had no soul, and this is how all of these big businesses operate because they are all about money and nothing else.
Now it feels reversed.
Except nowadays it's the soulless slop that sells whilst the 'soulful' remains fairly niche.
@@mojus2890 No, it's that these kinds of people always weasel their way into these companies. If they start good, before you know it marketing people with greedy mindsets take over the company bit by bit. I remember Steve Jobs mentioned this problem as well. Whatever is valuable has vultures circling over it.
EA:- We hate sales.
Ubisoft:-We hate money.
Sony:-We hate freewill.
Nintendo:-We hate gamers.
*Typical Generation we living in!*
Edit:-A genuine thx to everyone who liked.Felt happy to see so many guys and gals relate with the comment.
Microsoft: We hate you
(Adds Windows to Xbox)
@@Zhtrik Damn true bro💀
Ubisoft hate money 🤔 what
@@prakash_d_ace Hint:- Shadows.
They need a higher ESG score. I don’t blame them
And the future for companies like EA is being a thing of the past.
Yea, that isn’t going to happen. EA has been the gold standard of terrible devs for well over a decade and all the useful idiots still rush to buy “new game” year after year.
EA a lot smarter than most.
Sadly they can just keep releasing sport games and people will buy them
You mean sports garbage games, for the usual fools
EA's only way to survive is to dodge any type of game that isn't a sports franchise, those games require expensive licenses which saves them from indie competition, once they enter the same field with regular games they don't stand a chance with them having to promise profit for shareholders which requires making their games shitty money grabs.
You can block publishers and dev studios outright on steam. They won't show up on the store front for you. I highly recommend blocking ubisoft and EA.
You can only block a hundred... :(... I busted it... can't block any more.
Huge tip!
Gaben always wins
@SebSenGreen if you block 100 publishers you're left with furry porn and that's basically it.
@@DemiSupremi"Farming Simulator.. Does that have furries? No doesn't look like it."
*BLOCKED* 😂
These companies forgot money making 101
You must spent money to make money. Once you start losing money you investigate, do better and fund more money into it to make a comeback. And for the love of God stop catering to the people that don't buy your shit and stop spending so much goddam money on graphics
These are progressive companies, and they have progressive ideas. They won't debase themselves to listen to regular people. Regular people don't know anything about games. Just listen to the investors, they know what makes a game good.
I think they know about it very much. Just think about how they increase the budget each year for their games with Concord leading at $400M maybe more.
The problem is that it isn't "You must spent money to make money."
Entrepreneur 101 is actually "Spend less money, earn more profit." Earning money should not be tied with how much more you spend but the other way around. The less you spend, the more profit you have.
In games, the less capital they spend, the lower they can set the price and the more people can but their games. If they can do this without losing quality, that is the real Entrepreneur 101.
I swear every gaming company is allergic to just locking in and making an actually good game, they just got these suit wearing mfers making the company make woke games, nft games, blockchain games, ai games, WHAT ABOUT GOOD GAMES, IS THAT TOO MUCH TO ASK
fr bruh
they be trippin doe
making good stuff is cancerous to 2024 game companies
Thank you, Masayo, Masayo and Masayo. Very cool.
@@TzarOTG its my strat to get likes on a comment and it works everytime
The future of games is really in the hands of those who play them
You can stop giving them your money, but they'll find other ways to make it.
Concord definitely proved that. Players decided it had no future, and not even a present.
The future of games is going back to old games that are better anyway. There are thousands of older games that are fine to play. Nobody actually NEEDS new games and that's why the industry is scrambling to get rid of old games and make everything live service.
@@Theguy.fromthething If you say so. The basic rules of supply and demand still exist.
We have gone from 'EA: It's in the game' to 'AI : It made the game'
EA: Challenge Everything
AI: Challenged
EA and Ubisoft are racing to see what company will go bankrupt first.
Ubisoft winning rn
EA have multi billions in revenue from fifa alone every year so I doubt the woke n broke at ubisoft could handle that
Ubi is practically dead already, and AC Black Shadows will likely be the final straw. EA at least has their sports games to farm idiots with every year.
@@vans617 very true, EA isn't far behind though Both prioritise micro transactions over making good games.
@@christianalanwilson434 yeah the amount of money they make of games like fifa is insane, considering it's literally just the same game over and over.
27:10 "they were selling jpegs of monkeys for hundreds of thousands of dollars. How did this happen?" Its called money laundering
they buy anything that makes line go up, no matter how stupid.
Monkey Laundering
EA: Let's make this more epic...
Epic Games: Hold up, wait a minute... 🤔
EA: Let's make this more edgy...
Tim Langdell: 👨💼💼
I don't agree with Asmon's last sentence entirely. I am a software engineer, and the threat of AI to my job is not because it's good, but because it's good enough to make people without any formal knowledge to think it's good enough to potentially replace me. It's not got to fool me, it has to fool the ignorant. I can make use of a tool like copilot and guide it to be helpful, but I recognize it's mistakes and the nonsense it generates. Same with any other LLM producing code. I have the knowledge to look at it and see it's errors, and debug it, but I have 11 years experience to work with.
I agree, I used ChatGPT to develop a simple application, but I was following along every step, telling it to explain the parts I didn't understand, and asking it to correct the part it hallucinated. Someone with little to know programming knowledge can't do that. But it would've taken me 50x the time to develop that code myself because it used libraries I never knew about before.
Holy shit you are the only sane people I seen
Maybe in the very short term.. but when the companies that try to replace programmers go bankrupt by it, then it's just natural selection - you'll only be left with companies that don't try to replace programmers when all the ones that tried to failed because of it.
Don't forget, Bellular recommended Starfield and defended it. Bellular is a shill.
What?
I recommend playing it on gamepass. It is pretty good. I might buy it plus expansions if it is ever $20 or so.
Can't take him seriously after him running defense for Kotaku and Sweet Baby.
@@michaelh878 it's boring slop with a story on rails. It's probably OK if you just want a casual single player shooter but it's FAR from what this game was advertised as
How does Starfield relate to the video?
AI is a data harvesting tool, which is far more valuable to governments, data brokers, and advertisers. This is why it's being pushed so hard.
Bingo!
"For 2-3 years now, every time a computer makes a decision, it's called AI"
Meanwhile people talking about Pacman in the 80s...
all computers are AI, the definition is very generic.
Investors and shareholders piss me off. If you're not increasing profits forever then it's bad. they're not happy with steady profits. Like bro - just treat it like bread. There will always be a market and you'll always make money, stop trying to innovate bread or find ways of monetising it. Just give us the bread..
Bright side, only affects publicly traded companies. Unfortunately most publishers are publicly traded which means all glory to indie.
Endless greed. They would argue that it's that pressure that promotes innovation... but that's just smoke screen to make more money.
vote with your money
@@hakjobtm7472 but Indy can't give us games like CoD or MMOs etc. big campaigns and good SP games like Last of Us or God of War require big studios and manpower
@@kevinh4869 never say never.
The real "future of AI dev" is likely unreal engine, unity, and other engines having a limited ai feature, similar to how FL studio recently incorporated AI chord progressions and drummers
The future is an AI engine that produces entire experiences based on prompts that can be further refined by the end users themselves. A GameGPT-Roblox with a nearly endless number of pseudo-unique experiences.
@@funguy398 It doesn't have to be "slop" just because you've heard that word on Reddit.
@@spamtonto Being able to iterate on the experience as you play through it is definitely a key element. Want to play a massive RPG? If it tries to make the entire thing one-shot, it's going to be garbage. But start with a little bit, tell it what it needs to modify as you go through the experience, and just have it expand the world or plunk down a new location whenever you need it to. It's up to you as the player to tell it when it messed up balance and made something too strong or too weak. Really wish you could build a certain way? Just ask it to add it. As long as it can make these iterations without forcing you to start over.
Of course, if you want to share the final product, you'll need to rerun it to make sure something didn't break throughout the constant reiterations, but if you want to just create something tailored to you, and you don't mind, y'know, being a little creative, you'll get there. Eventually. Even if you need to sometimes spell it out and take the reins on some things yourself.
@SoverineSR It's definitely not going to come in the next several years or probably even couple decades, but GameGPT will be the final and ultimate game.
@@spamtontoYou are waaay off on that timeline. It will not be multiple decades. This shit is moving quickly.
BOSS: Can you make it 17% more epic?
DEV: 😐
I imagine A.I sandbox will be it's own genre of video game. A pretty popular one too if it gets really high quality. A.I will also allow you to speak to NPC's in games and they'll speak back. Like full on conversations. Immersion's going to go crazy.
Yeah the dynamic npc part is one of the best aspects, that and the potential to generate near-endless content if properly curated and given a purpose. I can see something of an entertainment revolution coming as a small team or even single person will be able to make their creative vision come to life in a relatively high-quality movie/game without needing to compromise with a studio. Of course we're also going to get a good deal of slop that way, but there are a lot of people out there with cool ideas who will finally have a way to share them with the world, and the entertainment industry will become more and more obsolete.
Customer support is the only thing you could’ve said where AI is not doing a good job. Have you ever tried using customer support with a robot? It’s atrocious
It saves companies a ton of money
Yeah as a customer I would rather speak to a human than a robot. I've had too many bad experiences where the robot has no clue what I'm talking about. And I am unable to make a complaint against it. Meanwhile call agents have supervisors I can bitch to if they mess up.
EA: You thought our games were shit now? Just wait...
AI doesn't demand a raise or promotion.
AI doesn’t need vacation time or mental health days.
AI doesn't require training or professional development.
AI doesn't quit because it found a better opportunity elsewhere.
AI doesn't get distracted by social media or personal phone calls.
AI doesn't make mistakes due to fatigue or lack of focus.
AI doesn't gossip or engage in office politics.
AI doesn't refuse to work overtime or during weekends.
AI doesn't need coffee breaks or lunch hours.
AI doesn't experience burnout from overwork.
AI also won't grab pitchforks when they're at the end of service (hopefully) but people for sure will when they lose their job and starve.
and when AI gets a little smarter it isn't going to want to do these crappy menial jobs corporations are forcing it to do, and that will be the beginning of the AI Uprising.
AI doesn't actually do anything useful.
smart person I agree
AI does need training though
They’re trying to skip over a major step with this. User created content is a reward for making a beloved baseline. Skyrim, half-life, dark souls, Minecraft, terraria they all had a strong foundation that users wanted to contribute to. You can’t just set people down with a blank canvas
I consider AI great for generating maps and NPCs and/ or items and then designers can still beautify them or give the last good look. Other than that, plot, storytelling, main characters, etc. Should not be touched by AI
then you get an epic pyramid
Asmon thinks if you can automate a very simple cashier job, that means AI works on something as complex as game development where every layer requires highly skilled engineers and artists.
yeah it's a random generator, good for nothing. there reason it exists is because we have so many things floating around on the internet already. why would I use a mash of random ideas when I can look at the original functional and tested solution the robot was trained on..
If you play FPS games, then you'll realize really quick that AI is horrible for generating maps. We already know there are a few that have been generated, and they all suck! I'll give you one right now, Babylon from Black Ops 6 beta
Some AI generated content can actually be good IF it is done correctly, but i haven't seen any of that yet, an example would be that one Skyrim AI NPC mod.
The only way i'm interested in using AI in gaming is to have NPCs feel more "alive"
The concept of almost fully conscious npc from those VRMMO korean manhwa was always a dream of mine.
"pretty much any time a computer makes a decision, it is called AI now" THIS. It annoys me to no end
Lmao the fact that EA thinks they can even talk about the future of gaming, they are a joke
Remember they're not talking to us.
@@Mythicalgoon you are right.
Unfortunately EA have the sports game Andy market by the balls.
As a developer, I think AI will degrade the quality of games in the early years. But in the long run there is no way around it
in the long un ai will only be able to get ressources from other ai art and will stagnate
@Ben-q6u at this point ai art will be so advanced that it wouldn't matter much.
I'm not sure AI is going to degrade the quality more than bad developers are already doing now
Remember when games were supposed to be about immersive and interactive experiences? Not just press a button and watch it do a thing… why are people so impressed with press a button it does a thing? Are we really that brain dead at this point? That all people want even as adults is the jingly keys? No actual engagement of the brain? Just mindless entertainment in the form of pretty flashing pixels, sad…
The future of EA is history.
0:46 i mean he looks like the villlain from ready player one 😂
Like I said before, after Ubisoft falls, EA needs to go next.
I would love EA to go as long as we keep tabs on where their executive branch slinks off to afterwards and pointedly don’t buy from that company either.
Nintendo first.
Nah, I want a good Battlefield game
Unlikely, they have plenty of sportsballs games that every normie buys every year
“The future of ice cream is Dip ‘N Dots”
16 times the details
4x the times of fallout 4
rendering landscaping technology
When game say these, they didnt talk to you. they talk to shareholders
I love that it shows the weapon selection screen with some cool looking stuff on it and they pick the most generic shotgun and rifle to use 🤣
These big companies are excited but the future of gaming isn’t the big companies it’s the Indy developers. As long as Steam keeps the market accessible and easy, the Indy devs will reign king.
of course, this AI will give you the opportunity to create another shooter 10,000 times, but it will not allow you to create a truly interesting game like 4 x strategy or city building simulator.
The future of games is AI assisted development. The code backbone will be written by AI and analysed for optimisation by human and/or AI. It will reduce development costs massively.
The games won't get cheaper tho.
@@DoppelgangerTH You are missing the final stage. Development cost? Each person will soon be able to make their own game with ai assistant.
They said the same thing about art. Give AI a few years and your comment might age like milk.
I fell that another ET era is roaming around. (ET is a game devolped in the early years of gaming and it was so bad the company buried all the copies In the dessert and when people find out about this gaming being to declined untill Nintendo enter the market).
My point is the more games is devolped by AI at would be least quality and unique and will become repetitive and thus will make people burn out of games and the sales will go down untill someone kicks in.
It's the first cold morning of the season where I live.
This morning I remember One of the worst parts of growing up poor, waking up in a cold house and having to get out of the warm blankets and taking a shower in a cold bathroom. Gaming Used to be a small mental escape from that back when games were made for players. Now with monetization for whaling so prevalent gaming has become a daily reminder for the poor knowing that we can't afford the good gaming experience like the wealthy that wake to a warm house and get to shower in a warm bathroom.
A.I. is going to create the ultimate addiction driven ,monetized skinner box. Gaming companies wont stop the unethical practices until governments regulate it and we all know how that goes.
Gaming is headed to become the newest "safety"" spout" on a gas can.
The only ally those people (devs, artists etc) could have against AI is the costumers, yet they keep fighting the costumers for not wanting politics inserted all over the product, they are doomed by their pride.
Real
Customers. Costumers are a diffetent thing, entirely. They make costumes.
Devs and artists do not decide what a game looks like. That’s like saying McDonald’s sucks because of of the cashier, or that X program doesn’t look good because of a programmer, they make what they are told to make.
Have you ever work in your life ?
@@CaptainRx-ss3rt "devs do not decide what a game looks like"
???
@@ryan.1990in big companies it works like that.
Suits are the ones making the calls. The devs are just the workers at the bottom of the command chain.
That s how you end with hyenas, anthem, star wars outlaws etc ..
I don't support AI generated slop as a replacement for actual artistic game creation.. but can we all agree that the random characters generated here still exceeded the quality of Concord? Rip
Just like NFT's, AI feels like another trend.
You don't understand about AI
correct AI is a scam. The tech companies are trying to create a bubble again.
NFT's are good, if you pick the right space, just like gaming, there's heap of trash then there's some quality products every now & then.
As a collector, NFT's have saved me from adding more physical items and cards to my collection cause it's digital so I have endless space for them online. Plus I can customize the rooms they're in without spending IRL money on real location rooms.
@@CHIM3RA.Nfts are ridiculous and a waste of time and money. Digital collection 😂
Until AI sets the trends.
I feel like some boomer but i dislike the rise of AI. It has lots of potential in a good way, but it has so so much potential for bad things i feel like.
One thing i note is that customer service gets replaced by AI a lot, so you get a bot and then a AI that pretends to be human. But in the way it types it is just clearly AI, and if you ask for specifik thing like "send me a new product because this product arrived broken", the AI will say it will take care of it, but then proceed to do nothing because it does not understand what to do.Kinda specifik but came across this sort of thing happening multiple times already
We JUST had this AI customer Support issue with Xplora watch....
The issue is companies scrambling to find literally anything they can plug it into but it’s just not really that good at anything. We’re decades away (at LEAST) from it being where they pretend it is.
@@FirstFamilyCharger it's literally just mostly buzzword, they call everything ai nowadays cuz "it makes money"
Prototyping games using ai will be a huge advantage. But of course, companies are braindead in creativity.
You are right.
AI is just a tool.
What you dislike is the way it might get used.
In late stage capitalism, it will be used to wreck jobs and homogenize arts.
So what you dislike is the system, not the tool in itself.
How will Twitter find a way to blame asmon for this lol
Twitter : He is being racist to AI
@@Ligmanutz the usual out of context clips or video title alone (no red bar).
Best part of AI for gaming will be good dialog.
I wont support any AI usage in anything, so EA will be even further ignored by myself. I already don't buy their games since the early to mid 2000s, but this is even a bigger reason to skip that company.
EA is the prime example of how not to run a video game company. Putting short term profits and trend chasing above making a good product. The Larian Studios method is what will carry the industry forward. Just focus on making the best game for your audience and utilize the feedback from people who actually play your games to do even better in the future.
24:25 Makes me think of robot spongebob "I don't wanna" lol
I'm a gamer at heart. But i dont look to most of these big companies for any good games anymore. Instead, I'll just use my time to create work of art that i want to see.
7:35 they just had the pyramid behind those boxes lmao
No they didn't?
19:44 didnt they say the same thing about NFTs ? Didnt it massively crash ? Didnt all the big companies try to invest and sell it ?
Edit:nvm he mentioned it
0:15 This is why the games industry is 💩: By all fairness EA's stock price should look like Ubisoft's
They also said that single player games would be over.
EA and ubisoft competing for the bottom spot
Everyone is just trying to build a holo deck, a tool to make as much products as quickly and cheaply as possible.
It will be used for both good things and just bad or selfish stuff. Its the human experience.
Asmond is complely out of touch with people that actually have to work
AI is anti-human
Fr. A part of me says we shouldn't have to hold back society for the fact that we need jobs for money and should instead change our entire system which won't happen for a lifetime, but at the same time I feel like having machines do everything for us could make us weaker
Listening to UA-cam/Streamers about anything connected to life is like talking to an Alien about housecleaning. Why do people even do that?
to be fair, machine learning is AI. AI has been existing for decades. Its just that people thinks something else when we say AI nowadays. But it is actually AI
Debugging is already annoying. If you didn't write the code yourself it'seven worse. And currently AI has a lot of bugs.
Debugging ai written code is not the same as debugging code written with human errors
AI isn't logical. If anything it's worse than human code because the AI never actually understands what I am asking. If you want it to do something no one has done before it doesn't work.
These people said the same thing with NFTs and blockchain and look where it is now.
3:00 Asmon STILL thinks AI creates lmao
What he means in the context is that can be used to be more productive (what it produces is another story) whereas blockchain has zero productivity period.
If you use magazines scissors and a price of poster board to make a collage did you "create" that collage?
@@caseylascallette7269yes I did I would be putting the individual materials together with my own hands to “create” a collage.
AI is better than anything EA has made in a decade, cause you can train AI on good games, instead of having trash developers re-releasing the same thing over and over, but it was bad from the start, so they act like an AI trained on only awful games
Theres a huge misconception of
Using AI= Entire Game is AI slop
Then they shouldn't make a presentation with, well... AI slop
ai is getting sued to oblivion anyway its unethical anyway it may puke out value but value of the back of millions of artists that dont stay silent
@@Ben-q6u where is it getting sued exactly? which company? by who? AI is not a single entity, there are tons of companies who provide some kind of AI service
The future is an AI game engine that kids can build entire worlds with prompts and refine them and play them with their friends. An entire catalog of people's customized experiences a la Roblox.
Anti-AI takes are Reddit-tier brainrot "think of the poor Concord devs" type hivemind.
@@Ben-q6u millions of artists that wont stay silent. Seems pretty quiet to me, outside of anti-ai circles at least. AI is the future, anyone who doesn't see that is already doomed
At least nobody has to get fired when Ai makes a flop.
I remember when Zach said that AI will not be coming for jobs and that it's nothing to worry about and is fear mongering.
Lol no you don't
@@janitorizamped oh yes I do. Even commented in the video because I'm in the games industry, specifically the art side. This is near and dear to everyone cause they don't want to be replaced by Ai.
@@thisGuy481ok lol, if you remember it so well, then you can surely point me to when he said that right? You're not just lying because you're a child with no friends right?
@@janitorizamped what does that have to do with anything? Why are you being so hostile? Super weird
People: "Make good video games and they will sell". EvilCorp CEO "Are you stupid? Absolutely not".
26 sec no views ..fell off
22 sec no comments?
Bro fallen off.
Can just imagine your hands shaking trying to comment the same trash before someone else does.
@@nooux1966 Don't we all have the urge and curiosity to try something for the first time? Welp this was one of that moment for me. First and the last time.
@@Eonsguts Should make liking your own comments a first and last time situation too.
@@nooux1966 no what's the problem with liking your own comment? I even like my own comment and heart it on my own UA-cam channel. XD
People are fighting automation, because it's not good for them. Not sure what's not to understand here. It doesn't benefit them, makes their lives worse. And looking back at the industrial revolution, how can you fault them for that?
People who say "skip" to ads by the video's creator are so lame. You don't have to pay a dime. Nobody likes ads, but have patience and show some appreciation to the creator. This is literally the least you can do.
A lot of the issues around AI is how hard major corporations are pushing it, so early and so quickly. I assume it's because they're just using consumers as their real-time testing, but the state at which so much of it is being tossed out there is terrible.
That AI demo looks great if it were in an existing online shooter like say Counter Strike or TF2 where everyone is on custom servers and custom maps. Remember downloaded all the de_rats and all that stuff? This AI stuff would be so amazing for that! What people have an issue about is 1. the presentation was cheese and 2. if they're making their games like that then it cheapens them. People would have a problem with it if it were an online game mode or mod tools.
Technically, this means that EA will only make single player games, unless they're implying that the computer-controlled characters in their previous games weren't controlled by the computer.
Stupid EA could have made a free Star Wars Battlefront online game and brought in infinite Cash flow by selling SW character skins. But they just can't think
Question... Doesn't a game like this make a company like EA redundant?
Android Wilson also said the future for our games was nfts just a few short years ago. These fucking executives just a latch on to the latest greatest get richer quicker scheme regardless if it's a good idea or not.
Just imagine asking the AI to: make another 1000 dungeons in an open world with another 1000 bosses. O wait, pallword already is doing it and is ahead compared to EA.
they should tell ai to make a different shaped pokeball, so nintendo stops sueing them
No devs (A.I.), no players (propaganda), activists (burn to the ground)... what a strange landscape video game is becoming.
Stock value is like 90% companies BS-ing to their shareholders about how well they're doing and will do. It's only value as a metric is determining how confident investors are in a company, and most investors are completely ignorant of how the thing they are investing in actually works.
I think AI will also move the bar higher. Imagine being an indie dev and being able to create quality models/materials/animations in no time, smaller temas will be able to make bigger games.
A publicly traded company does not have a responsibility to "maximize shareholder profit". It has a responsibility to INCREASE shareholder profit. Not maximize. Because maximize is an undefinable term that is also by default an impossible statement, because you can't ever say you have maximized profit. You can say that increasing share value was the thing you aimed for, but maximizing it can't be a goal. And it isn't a part of a responsibility. The only responsibility a publicly traded company has, is to seek growth of share value. To what degree, and through which means, is entirely up to that company and how they believe growth is most sustainable.
You can easily say that your idea (as a company) of how to achieve sustainable growth of share value, is to focus on making solid uncompromised games that ensure your customer base stays loyal and invested for years. You can also say that you will shove monetization down everyone's throat in an attempt to squeeze the bag of everything it's worth at the cost of all brand value and customer loyalty. There is no responsibility to do one over the other, the only responsibility is to seek growth and a profit return for shareholders.
Most companies just don't have the balls to do what's right.
I think all these AAA publishers crumbling under the weight of trying to make the biggest, best looking games has been a huge benefit for the indie game community. I've played more Indies and remasters of '90s games this year than anything else. Also Morrowind. I'll be playing Tamriel Rebuilt for ages. At least until Skywind comes out.
I think we have all missunderstood this, imagine playing dragon age and saying "Make the boobs bigger", "make the boobs bounce more". "Add boob physic".
We are in the wrong, not EA.
This is impossible. The amount 0f power an Ai would need to achieve this would make it more expensive than just hiring a team of devs to do it instead.
AI will do marvelous thing for gaming, i'm pretty sure of it. The UE5 AI environmental building too is very impressive and soo much better then the boring procedural stuff from Starfield or NMS.
Literally the only thing keeping EA afloat is their low effort sport games. Sport gamers are a lost cause so they'll keep buying the same game every year that offers little to no changes as their feedback is ignored. That's why I don't think they'll ever sink the way Ubisoft did
games are trash nowadays if ai fixes it that will actually be pathetic
EA: Ai is good
Gamimg community: 🤣🫵🤡
EA are correct tho. AI is good for technology, not so much for people that will lose jobs though.
People are calling them clowns because nobody trusts EA to not overuse the said AI to fully create shit games that nobody will want to play. AI is not the problem.
GIGO principle still applies. (Garbage in, garbage out)
I’m a software engineer that has access to AI as a development aide. It’s both a tremendous blessing and a curse. Overall I think it’s great at suggesting solutions and where it really excels for me is generating html because front end development is a soulless endeavor
This happens when the investor is the client and the captive userbase is just part of the product. Users are no longer clients, they are consumers.
We used to call machine learning artificial intelligence back in the day, but then came the AI winter and people would be ridiculed for working in the field. So there was a rebrand to 'Machine Learning' to try and separate the field from past failure, but it always *has* been 'AI'.
6:01 - Quick tip for Asmon: if you want to easily A/B compare content from different tabs in your browser, you can just drag one tab to the right edge of your screen(or left) and let go. The tab you drag-dropped will then take up one side of your screen, then you can chose whatever tab/program to take up the other half. Voila - you now have side-by-side comparison!
30:16
Sometimes you get lucky. I worked in a taco bell which was consistently 1/17 in its region. We had this idiot that would be on the line making food with instructions to make the burrito right infront of his fucking face. He picks up lettuce and the order taker and the person next to him on the line say "it doesn't come with lettuce"
And then he literally throws the lettuce on the burrito in the most dramatic fashion I've ever seen.
They didn't fire him because the remaining talent pool was likely to be just as bad, but we made him wash dishes and we put that burrito out correctly. If I was on shift I made sure everything went out fast and that it was right.
At later times of day though, that guy was usually working and the people around him were more competent than him, but they didn't give nearly as much of a shit.
I of course quit because my boss was trying to get me to do more work than I was already busting my ass to do. It was because HIS boss was literally yelling at him in meetings in front of his peers and over the phone because 1/17 wasn't good enough. We were even in the top 200 of ALL taco bells in 2022 and somehow we need to trickle down abuse because the CEO of the franchise needed a new Lexus or something.
Its actually an awesome usecase. if they used it as a copilot and gave some of their creatives tools to smooth shape and add detail to the environment you could have a game in 1/10th time and money they take now.
that's not only "how today's story happens", that's how the story of nowadays happens.
These companies don't understand the word "Innovation". Doing the same thing but better or faster through AI isn't innovative. Innovation is creating something new, never before seen or heard of that elevates the industry as a whole, not just your company.
That wasnt very **SWORD** of them