44:00 - yeah the struggle mechanics do be a meme. "I have conquered the entire region, can I end it via conquest pls?" "No it's in the peace phase you are forbidden from declaring it ended until a bunch of rulers murder each other for reasons."
@@leagueofdead569 I'm not too sure what you're getting at. The celts preceeded the Anglo-saxons / anglo-Danes as the original English people. Here in England it's common knowledge and we all get taught it in school from a young age. Anglo saxon is a strange label to use in modern day times, not too dissimilar to an italian calling themselves 'Roman'. Whilst there is nothing wrong with people being proud of where they come from, self-identification as Anglo saxon does seem to be something that only the far right are doing. Perhaps a backlash to the national 'British' identity, which is far more cultural than ethnic. I've never heard anyone self identify with the term Anglo saxon IRL, it seems to only be used on the Internet. It also just isn't really very accurate. The modern British identity was formed in the last 500 years, and Anglo saxon culture isn't around any more. No self-professed 'anglo saxon' is gonna name their firstborn son Gyrth or Æthelstan lol. The Norman conquest was a millennium ago and times have changed. Do you see where I'm coming from?
@@leagueofdead569 The people that created England today were the Celts, Romans, Angle, Jutes, Saxons, Norse, and Normans. They made England. Anglo-Saxons are an important part of history and had a vision for England, a vision that the Romans had already accomplished a few hundred years earlier. Our history books have largely been warped by Ango-Saxon elite to belittle the importance of all other peoples and hertiages that were within Britian in the first millium.
What are you talking about lol? The Anglo-Saxons literally created England and the idea of 'Englishness'. The name England can be traced back to 'land of the Angles' or 'Anglaland'. Without the Anglo-Saxons, there wouldn't an England. And how on earth can you include the Romans when they left the island like 500 years earlier? @@UkSapyy
26:34 "The upside of the Kingdom of Britannia breaking is that I'm less threatened by a big kingdom. The _downside_ is tha--" *[War declaration pops up, enemy ruler puts on helmet in real time]* The timing, Jesus Christ 😂
Laith in EU4: Complains that he can't take the territory of people who are at war with the same nation that he is at war with like in CK3 Laith in CK3: Complains that if someone else is at war with the same target you are also at war with them pick one laith (yes i know they are differnt situations)
@@FredrikSkievan What I was talking about is that, in CK3 you can take a nation's occupied territory if they are occupying territory from a nation you are also at war with.
@@SirSquier no other rulers so no catalists to make it that fast, it's more like a thousand years just on the background yearly tick, and that is to get to the conciliation period, then another thousand to swing round to the migration period again and another thousand while trying to cheese the points to get it to go hostile phase this time. Which I think is a bit more time than the game allows... I did the calculations when I got the same situation and ragequit
But it’s more the way it’s used and the context. Far right groups say it as through not being Anglo-Saxon is a bad thing, which isn’t great. Far right groups are very anti immigration which is ironic since they say shit like “we’re true Anglo Saxons being replaced by migrants” when that’s how the Anglo Saxons arrived in Britain in the first place lol
@@breadstick4458 The anglo-saxons are more native to England than the Creeks are to the creeks for which they are named. No native human civilization exists (outside of Africa) by your definition.
@@breadstick4458No they don't. They just have claims to their homeland as anyone else does. Nothing to do with supremacy. Anglo-Saxon's didn't "migrate", they invaded. There's a difference. Anglo-Saxon migration hypothesis has been debunked.
32:03 Unless you are in a Crusade as I have just learned. Because sieging down Rome and capturing the Pope gives you absolutely nothing in terms of warscore.
Quick not when you spoke about Brugge, there was actually another king in between Harold and William. His name was Edgar and after 2 months he gave the crown to William
Cultural overview of world lol “Parthian, Eranian…” wat Both are “Eranian.” (*Eran is the old name for Iran, as the Sassanid dynasty referred to it as Eranshahr). Weird oversight. A simple google of “Parni” (Parthian) would’ve confirmed that.
Yes that was Paradox’s intent. They’re doing that for a lot of core game mechanic stuff they add with the bug updates and they won’t charge for any mechanics that they’re just bringing over from CK2.
I ran into the same problem, conquered the entirety of the British isles as a welsh guy during the migration phase and just as I was taking out the last two or three stragglers it clicked over to the compromise phase where the only way to end the struggle is to own less than half of the British isles (and be allies with all the other rulers or summat) Now I'm playing the mod starting as the duke of Rome, conquered everything I needed to reunite the Western Roman Empire decision but can't do it because you need to be of the Latin government type and Rome was Feudal???
The creator of this mod clearly has some biases. Germanic peoples can't form Britannia because... yes. The Romans and Gallic Celts can though! Whoop de f*cking doo!
grasper noun. A person who believes, argues, or attempts something that is impossible/improbable while under the false impression that it is possible/probable. A grasper might attempt to date someone out of his/her range or argue that his favorite team is going to win the championship despite not having done so in decades. Often, graspers meekly make self-serving arguments that stretch logic. Derived from the phrase "grasping at straws".
I thought you just had trouble ending the Struggle, not that you completely forgot how the Struggle Mechanic works. You brought up the Struggle UI multiple times, just click on “view ending decisions” to see the MULTIPLE ways you could end the struggle. Smh. Very silly.
literally in the struggle screen, where it shows the current phase, click the text that says VIEW ENDING DECISIONS to choose one of the ways to end the struggle. You don't end it by taking that decision you kept hyperfocusing on lmao. You literally wasted hours because you refused to read the text that was right there.
There is a small country called Croatia in Austria, I challenge you to play as Croatia, become independet, destroy Austria, drive ottomans back, have full control over old yugoslavia territories, try to also be in top 10 powers at the end of the challenge. Thanks for everything you do :D Have a good day. And if you by any chance find this easy I can give a few extra rules I guess something like "You must stay monarchy always, cannot trade with the austrians and ottomans (embargo em pretty much), cannot ally the austrians, ottomans, serbs, montenegro and russians. I think thats it. It could be too much even for such a CHAD like you". I do apologise for not saying it right away this is for Victoria 3. Day 10 of asking.
those people calling themselves "anglo saxons" are wrong too because the majority of english people have at least 50% celtic blood the germanics killed the males and married the females when they conquered the britons, so it makes sense for them to be half celtic
Even then it was only Lords replacing old lords. For the average person it was essentially a change in language of the boss. The only people that pretty much settled post Roman Britain were vikings and no part of the islands were ignored by them.
@@faelirra no the anglo saxons were coming in by a large amount. it is estimated that they were about half a million strong. for comparison, the visigoths in spain were numbered at around 50 thousand.
This isn't particularly true, most English people are majority Germanic. In genetic testing via fixation index and autosmal genetic distances based on classical markers it actually showed modern English and Danes to be the most closely linked groups in Europe in terms of genetic distance, the greatest distance being the African Pygmies and Papua people. Of course this all depends on area, some areas in western england are definitely more Celtic
Anglo Saxons aren't German, Germany didn't exist. Anyone claiming Anglo Saxon ancestry is simply claiming they've been here for 1500 years. Stop being a pick me for liberals you sad little guy
@@water2160 I am far right, I will admit that, but still I don’t see what the problem is even without the far right to admit love for your ancestral heritage, I’m not even English
I don’t think he meant anything by it; I believe it was just poking fun at English identity originating from Germanic people as opposed to the older Celtic inhabitants of the island of Britain.
@@matthewjohnson6280 nah the German joke was funny, but still I have England friends who call themselves Anglos I don’t see the reason why it’s a far right thing to be intact with your ancestral culture
You should do one conquering Britain starting as the Tunis guy and creating Anglo-Berber culture. 😃
Up up!!!
Once finished call it something along the lines of Neo-Carthage?
wouldnt it be called arabian berber then
@@imkeepingmynamethis its *Anglo-Saxon* and Tunisian not Arabian
@@imkeepingmynamethis Leith Culture. 🙂
44:00 - yeah the struggle mechanics do be a meme. "I have conquered the entire region, can I end it via conquest pls?" "No it's in the peace phase you are forbidden from declaring it ended until a bunch of rulers murder each other for reasons."
Yeah
Needs some reworks
I feel like this 8s easily fixed by just having an absolute dominance ending wherein you control every single relevant county.
renal artery failure
indeed
i hate it when the artery in my rene fails
Yah yah yah unf booga
So it would seem, so it would seem.
SAd news for the renus
I love that at 26:40 you can see the enemy ruler put on his rad helmet in real time in the declaration popup.
"Just a weird way to call themselves german" hahahahahaha
its odd that English racists like to call themselves Anglo-Saxons cos when have the Germans ever been racist? lol
@@leagueofdead569 I'm not too sure what you're getting at. The celts preceeded the Anglo-saxons / anglo-Danes as the original English people. Here in England it's common knowledge and we all get taught it in school from a young age. Anglo saxon is a strange label to use in modern day times, not too dissimilar to an italian calling themselves 'Roman'. Whilst there is nothing wrong with people being proud of where they come from, self-identification as Anglo saxon does seem to be something that only the far right are doing. Perhaps a backlash to the national 'British' identity, which is far more cultural than ethnic. I've never heard anyone self identify with the term Anglo saxon IRL, it seems to only be used on the Internet. It also just isn't really very accurate. The modern British identity was formed in the last 500 years, and Anglo saxon culture isn't around any more. No self-professed 'anglo saxon' is gonna name their firstborn son Gyrth or Æthelstan lol. The Norman conquest was a millennium ago and times have changed. Do you see where I'm coming from?
@@leagueofdead569 The people that created England today were the Celts, Romans, Angle, Jutes, Saxons, Norse, and Normans. They made England. Anglo-Saxons are an important part of history and had a vision for England, a vision that the Romans had already accomplished a few hundred years earlier. Our history books have largely been warped by Ango-Saxon elite to belittle the importance of all other peoples and hertiages that were within Britian in the first millium.
@@UkSapyy Some nations aren't lucky like that, being made up by too many ethnical elements.
What are you talking about lol? The Anglo-Saxons literally created England and the idea of 'Englishness'. The name England can be traced back to 'land of the Angles' or 'Anglaland'. Without the Anglo-Saxons, there wouldn't an England. And how on earth can you include the Romans when they left the island like 500 years earlier? @@UkSapyy
26:34 "The upside of the Kingdom of Britannia breaking is that I'm less threatened by a big kingdom. The _downside_ is tha--" *[War declaration pops up, enemy ruler puts on helmet in real time]*
The timing, Jesus Christ 😂
The Anglish and the Saxons-
The Jutes: :(
No one remembers the Jutes.
@@walnzell9328 think that’s bad the Frisians get it worse no one ever remembers them
@@Loci666 I forgot about them. I didn't know Frisians migrated to England.
Even in the modern day, if you listen to Frisian without concentrating, you might think they're just speaking English@@walnzell9328
@@walnzell9328 old English is nearly identical 5o old english
Laith in EU4: Complains that he can't take the territory of people who are at war with the same nation that he is at war with like in CK3
Laith in CK3: Complains that if someone else is at war with the same target you are also at war with them
pick one laith
(yes i know they are differnt situations)
You cant take territory of "people who are at war with the same nation" in ck3 either. You can fight battles but you cant seige them.
@@FredrikSkievan What I was talking about is that, in CK3 you can take a nation's occupied territory if they are occupying territory from a nation you are also at war with.
@@apossiblyhereticalalphaleg3595 Oh yeah that’s true, my bad G.
@@FredrikSkievan we all make mistakes, and it's easy to misunderstand people on the internet.
Laith there's interactions in the struggle menu to end it.
He had dropped into the compromise phase, which requires you to own less than 50% of Britannia to end the struggle.
@@charimonfanboy lol guess he'll have to wait like 100 years
@@SirSquier no other rulers so no catalists to make it that fast, it's more like a thousand years just on the background yearly tick, and that is to get to the conciliation period, then another thousand to swing round to the migration period again and another thousand while trying to cheese the points to get it to go hostile phase this time. Which I think is a bit more time than the game allows... I did the calculations when I got the same situation and ragequit
@@charimonfanboy you can still trigger catalysts as long as your vassels are involved
Absolutely admire how knowledgeable you are! makes every video ten times better!
Next time can you play as Britannia prima with ambrosius aurelianus?
The Motto of House Laith: Live by the Speed 5, Die by the Speed 5.
It wasn't only the anglos and the saxons, but also the jutes.
I've been waiting for this video for months, YES !!!!
On my run I played as the Finns and migrated to England. Ukonusko England was a fun campaign
As a Lindsey, our clan motto is 'to suffer bravely', so... **slowclap**
17:20 pure comedy. Holy shit. Things could not have come together better
Hope you'll play the Elder Kings 2 mod too.
22:41 - this is why you make your court chaplain your court physician
Challenge: Make Great Britain great again on Vicky3 and counter the French hegemony of the game before the rebalances hit
genuinely thz for the history lesso at 19:00 until u said that i genuinely thought charles martel and charlemagne were the same guy
Laith I’d love to watch you play the elder kings 2 mod!
Yes I've been. Waiting for this ty laith
Day 4 of asking Laith to continue his Victoria 3 Tunisia campaign.
*Perfidious Albion achievement.*
*Imperator: Rome.*
*DO IT.*
The Anglo Saxons are one of the settled tribes of England - This is not a "Far-Right" take. It is fact.
I wouldn’t stress he doesn’t look Anglo-Saxon anyway he has that protruding jaw phenotype lmfao
But it’s more the way it’s used and the context. Far right groups say it as through not being Anglo-Saxon is a bad thing, which isn’t great. Far right groups are very anti immigration which is ironic since they say shit like “we’re true Anglo Saxons being replaced by migrants” when that’s how the Anglo Saxons arrived in Britain in the first place lol
@@Princeofbelka He's algerian lmao
@@breadstick4458 The anglo-saxons are more native to England than the Creeks are to the creeks for which they are named. No native human civilization exists (outside of Africa) by your definition.
@@breadstick4458No they don't. They just have claims to their homeland as anyone else does. Nothing to do with supremacy.
Anglo-Saxon's didn't "migrate", they invaded. There's a difference. Anglo-Saxon migration hypothesis has been debunked.
So, when laith is displeased, he becomes austrian?
32:03
Unless you are in a Crusade as I have just learned. Because sieging down Rome and capturing the Pope gives you absolutely nothing in terms of warscore.
Good thing there's no underwater pipelines around.
“Stress Level Critical” lol 😂
Do you have any youtube channel recommendations for learning the history you refer to? I’d love to learn about the post roman era
Epic history TV is a great channel
Cambrian Chronicles has some good videos specifically about Wales during this time period
I’m 18 minutes in and I was sure we’d make it through a video without him talking about the mayors of the palace. I was wrong.
you should do a soissons run
"How have you brought so many men to bare." Yep that's my experience with CK3.
Grasper means willing to take and hold power or something of that nature
immer diese Angelsachsen!!!
Quick not when you spoke about Brugge, there was actually another king in between Harold and William. His name was Edgar and after 2 months he gave the crown to William
Thus Britannia was reborn, with the Pendragon the Chief Dragon of Britain the true High King bringing order and justice across the lands.
The jutes also emigrated to Britain
The anglo tribe was actually danish and not german
@@Geo-nw9ug I'm not sure you can talk about distinct German and Danish culture at that point in time.
youcan just see his soul leave him 25:39
cardiac arrest
wish i could play these start dates on consie
why the hell was king flavianus of francia a steppe nomad!?!?!?
Cultural overview of world lol
“Parthian, Eranian…” wat
Both are “Eranian.” (*Eran is the old name for Iran, as the Sassanid dynasty referred to it as Eranshahr).
Weird oversight. A simple google of “Parni” (Parthian) would’ve confirmed that.
Good Stuff
Do elder kings 2 next
14:11 best part
Hmm yes lore momentum of pax britannia 100
That’s such a funny way of putting it, calling them Germans, or even worse, d*nish 😂
The struggle thing is pretty funny cuz you get it without the iberia dlc so i who doesnt have the money to buy dlc's got to play the struggle for free
Yes that was Paradox’s intent. They’re doing that for a lot of core game mechanic stuff they add with the bug updates and they won’t charge for any mechanics that they’re just bringing over from CK2.
Ah, so a historical run
22:41 That is one of the worst things I could imagine..... So egregious it's awful
I want ck3 with tes mod, i think high elf incest dwarf will be a great joke
I already miss Draculaith.
sick video
Cool
Laith use your most valuable resource, unmarried women, matrilineal marry them to the best knight’s you can
Laith the Irish king is called a leprechaun, don't be insensitive
0:43 based laith
why do you always play on 5 speed
DON’T FORGET US THE JUTES😢
What about frisians
I ran into the same problem, conquered the entirety of the British isles as a welsh guy during the migration phase and just as I was taking out the last two or three stragglers it clicked over to the compromise phase where the only way to end the struggle is to own less than half of the British isles (and be allies with all the other rulers or summat)
Now I'm playing the mod starting as the duke of Rome, conquered everything I needed to reunite the Western Roman Empire decision but can't do it because you need to be of the Latin government type and Rome was Feudal???
The creator of this mod clearly has some biases. Germanic peoples can't form Britannia because... yes. The Romans and Gallic Celts can though! Whoop de f*cking doo!
do you listen to the British History Podcast?
laith play as mushasha on flavour universalis mod
But can you conquer Galicia Volhynia the historical way??
'its just a wierd way to call themselves German' really makes xenophobia look stupid
*ANGRY WELSH NOISES*
The Celtic nightmare.
Damn there's SO MANY spelling errors in that mod, you'd think with so much work put into it, that they would at least correct their spelling x)
The Frisians were also there.
What is the name of this mod?
Truce break?
2:00 🤣🤣🤣
First can you play in somalia next time I would really like that
Can you link to the mod?
what is the mod name?
also its because that was the wrong decision
grasper
noun. A person who believes, argues, or attempts something that is impossible/improbable while under the false impression that it is possible/probable. A grasper might attempt to date someone out of his/her range or argue that his favorite team is going to win the championship despite not having done so in decades. Often, graspers meekly make self-serving arguments that stretch logic. Derived from the phrase "grasping at straws".
why tf did Hengest turn britano roman -.-
what mod is that
It's vanilla 💀
Probably should report it
Norse Kent, isn’t in Kent and it isn’t Norse.
Borger
I thought you just had trouble ending the Struggle, not that you completely forgot how the Struggle Mechanic works. You brought up the Struggle UI multiple times, just click on “view ending decisions” to see the MULTIPLE ways you could end the struggle. Smh. Very silly.
please stabalize your audio big having big disturbing spikes
why would you play anglo saxons instead of trying to survive as the Romano British ;_;
Hello
Virgin Germs vs Chad Latin
2:21 ahhh yes. The queer religion
Britons having a religion which sounds like ‘Queer’ is very on-point
The English are Germanic but we have a lot of romance words in the language. But it's kind of like compering Americans to the English
It's not weird when far right say they're proud Anglo-Saxons, we know we're Germanic, we're proud of it.
Good vid though bro
Yeah he has to drop in liberal propaganda it let's you have more midrolls and ad revenue from nazitube
literally in the struggle screen, where it shows the current phase, click the text that says VIEW ENDING DECISIONS to choose one of the ways to end the struggle. You don't end it by taking that decision you kept hyperfocusing on lmao. You literally wasted hours because you refused to read the text that was right there.
There is a small country called Croatia in Austria, I challenge you to play as Croatia, become independet, destroy Austria, drive ottomans back, have full control over old yugoslavia territories, try to also be in top 10 powers at the end of the challenge. Thanks for everything you do :D Have a good day. And if you by any chance find this easy I can give a few extra rules I guess something like "You must stay monarchy always, cannot trade with the austrians and ottomans (embargo em pretty much), cannot ally the austrians, ottomans, serbs, montenegro and russians. I think thats it. It could be too much even for such a CHAD like you". I do apologise for not saying it right away this is for Victoria 3. Day 10 of asking.
those people calling themselves "anglo saxons" are wrong too because the majority of english people have at least 50% celtic blood
the germanics killed the males and married the females when they conquered the britons, so it makes sense for them to be half celtic
Even then it was only Lords replacing old lords. For the average person it was essentially a change in language of the boss. The only people that pretty much settled post Roman Britain were vikings and no part of the islands were ignored by them.
@@faelirra The Anglo-Saxons DID settle, in very large numbers, cause, you know, it was a migration.
@@faelirra no the anglo saxons were coming in by a large amount. it is estimated that they were about half a million strong. for comparison, the visigoths in spain were numbered at around 50 thousand.
This isn't particularly true, most English people are majority Germanic. In genetic testing via fixation index and autosmal genetic distances based on classical markers it actually showed modern English and Danes to be the most closely linked groups in Europe in terms of genetic distance, the greatest distance being the African Pygmies and Papua people. Of course this all depends on area, some areas in western england are definitely more Celtic
Anglo Saxons aren't German, Germany didn't exist. Anyone claiming Anglo Saxon ancestry is simply claiming they've been here for 1500 years. Stop being a pick me for liberals you sad little guy
Far right to be proud of your ancestors? Wtf
It's pretty telling that you heard Laith say it's "popular among the far-right" and immediately assumed he was talking about you lmao
@@water2160 fr lmao
@@water2160 I am far right, I will admit that, but still I don’t see what the problem is even without the far right to admit love for your ancestral heritage, I’m not even English
I don’t think he meant anything by it; I believe it was just poking fun at English identity originating from Germanic people as opposed to the older Celtic inhabitants of the island of Britain.
@@matthewjohnson6280 nah the German joke was funny, but still I have England friends who call themselves Anglos I don’t see the reason why it’s a far right thing to be intact with your ancestral culture
gay
L