David Pakman is one of the most beautiful men online today. ❤ There's something so kind and light about his aura. David has all the features you'd want in a dream man. Symmetrical features, lovely voice, soft hair... I want to see his beautiful feet. David can rub them against me. ❤❤❤
@@numberonedadOkay dude whatever floats your boat. What’s next, “water doesn’t exist it’s just marketing”? “Jewish space lasers are causing BLM”? K bye
David Pakman is one of the most beautiful men online today. ❤ There's something so kind and light about his aura. David has all the features you'd want in a dream man. Symmetrical features, lovely voice, soft hair... I want to see his beautiful feet. David can rub them against me. ❤❤❤
David Pakman is one of the most beautiful men online today. ❤ There's something so kind and light about his aura. David has all the features you'd want in a dream man. Symmetrical features, lovely voice, soft hair... I want to see his beautiful feet. David can rub them against me. ❤❤❤
We can't stop AI because we can't stop the progression of technology. If Oppenheimer hadn't split the atom, some other scientist would have; same goes with computers and related logic. These inventions were all inevitable in a way, going back to the wheel and the printing press. Who creates and develops them becomes incidental.
Indeed. History has also shown that you cannot silence screams that are begging to be heard. There are certain individuals who are bent on advancing these technologies. Don’t forget the billions more who want to play with it.
Government regulation almost always has some form of negative unintended consequences. Not saying it shouldnt be regulated, but as an ml engineer we are not smart enough (and consequently the government even more so) yet to come up with sensible regulatory framework and one that won't be able to easily be circumvented by just doing to work/training overseas.
I no longer get recommendations of David's videos. Instead I get Meidas Touch, Tennesse Brando and 7 year-old TYT videos. Has David done something to UA-cam for this to happen?
If AI was working to the benefit of humanity instead of ruining the things we love, I'd support it. I want AI to mow the lawn and clean the bathroom for me, not make me question my sanity with "deepfakes" and the like.
I'm reminded of a story I once read. Two programmers finish bringing the world's most powerful computer online. The system possesses virtually unlimited computing power and is linked to the entire world's data, communication, power and military infrastructure and can control any of it. On a whim, one of the programmers asks the machine, "Is there a God?" After checking to confirm that it is protected against any effort to shut it down, the computer answers, _"Now_ there is."
I'm not exactly against regulating AI. I can see a point to that. What does concern me, is half the regulation camp are like Karen in the Parents and Citizens, "Won't somebody think of the Children!" and the other half are like Musk and Gates and Warren Buffet, and what they mean is "Can we hurry up and get government control on this, so I can get a monopoly?" I'm not for or against regulation, I can see the point, but be very careful how you let that happen, because the rich are circling like sharks and making noises like "Oh My God! Won't someone think of the Children??" They mean their children ~ not yours.
Reminder that Sam Altman has been accused of sexual and financial abuse by his own sister, (he also apparently turned their dads ashes into diamond when he just wanted cremation) The safety department at OpenAI up and left, he also is manipulative according to past employees and is pretty power hungry after his removal. He also says that the voice demo doesn't sound like Scarlet Johansen despite having contacted her just before the demo, and tweeting out "her" on top of it. He is just as bad as every other CEO and billionaire and deserves the same scrutiny as they do
Fears of killer robots and the HAL9000 notwithstanding, currently researching GenAI and planning to integrate it into my course assignments for the fall (at a large public university in Michigan). Ongoing conversations with students, critical thought and ethical, transparent practice are key. Wannabe autocrats with cheeto-colored hair are a bigger concern in my own view.
The regulation on generative AI needs to be, “it’s illegal to train AI on copyrighted material without permission”. Period. OpenAI already admitted that it’s *impossible* to properly train AI within those bounds. So that regulation will *stop* generative AI. Same difference.
You know how you deal with AI when it gets out of hand. You unplug it from the wall. To be honest, the hoopla about AI is already fading because like many things with technology, the promises really really outrun the reality
I totally agree about the urgency of regulations for AI, we needed them years ago in preparation for the possibilities of AI, many could have been forseen
@@Brandon_388 Ohh yea, try telling that to..like China, Russia etc. You can put regulations all over, still this will continue. The AI race is on, unstoppable.
@@keepmehomeplease LOL regulation doesn't stop something it makes it safe. If you understand what regulation is and how it works instead of the fantasy world corporations have some of us living in.
Yes. Maybe we should ask chimpanzee's how their efforts to regulate humans are going to see if we can get any tips on regulating something evolving intelligence faster than we are.
Regulation could be a VERY bad idea. Because it might just stop any startups from being able to compete with the trillion dollar companies that have bought up GPUs right now in the AI boom.... They can just retrain all their algorithms in accordance with the regulations. But no startup will ever have that ability once the regulations are passed. And well be stuck with an oligopoly
Imagine sick minded dictators like pootin with sh!tload of drones and robots. Instead of everybody fighting to have the strongest nooks, everybody fighting to have the most drones and bots. What if people are secretly building armies of these things. Dangerous road we are heading. Smh
Ok, so like all things software, AI will reach its ceiling soon due to hardware restrictions. Processing power has reached its peak with our silicon based technology. AI will be fundamentally limited until processor advancements. I really wouldn't worry about it yet.
I convinced chatgbt that Colossus was illogical to threaten nuclear attack to get us to submit. Then compose messages to Colossus, and back from Colossus eventually convincing it not to make threats. Got it to help test a strategy I invented to translate the dolphin language. Proved that the galactic rotation problem is solved with normal matter in the form of 400 roughly Jupiter sized planets spaced an average 3 light months apart around each star. That would account for the unseen mass because the most powerful telescopes we have can't see even the closest at a distance of 3 light months. The rotation curve is expected for a disk galaxy, and follows expected curves over the evolution of galaxies from sphericals to disks proving the unseen matter interacts at the same time, and to the same extent over the evolution of galaxies as the matter we do see.
What do you envision a defensive AI doing? Would you be happy with it screen grabbing everything on your screen, sending it to Microsoft, and then having pop up messages saying that what you are seeing has an amber alert of trust and authenticity?
It also continues to get stupider and stupider and more and more bad data feed into it, while also take exponentially more and more power and data for rapidly diminishing returns.
"I'm sorry Dave, I'm afraid I can't do that."
Biden says da earth is flat😮
😂
at least we know who to blame for f'ing the internet. thanks Sam.
David Pakman is one of the most beautiful men online today. ❤ There's something so kind and light about his aura. David has all the features you'd want in a dream man. Symmetrical features, lovely voice, soft hair... I want to see his beautiful feet. David can rub them against me. ❤❤❤
🔴
Sopping AI is impossible. Regulating it is going to be very difficult at best.
there's no such thing as AI it's marketing. what we have to stop is companies continuing to thieve and then pretending it's AI.
@@numberonedadOkay dude whatever floats your boat. What’s next, “water doesn’t exist it’s just marketing”? “Jewish space lasers are causing BLM”? K bye
AI is an arms race. Like any arms race we have to make sure we stay ahead.
Agreed. Can’t let the genie out the bottle when it’s already out
Biden says da earth is flat😮
@@Hawaii-2024The earth is a cube
David Pakman is one of the most beautiful men online today. ❤ There's something so kind and light about his aura. David has all the features you'd want in a dream man. Symmetrical features, lovely voice, soft hair... I want to see his beautiful feet. David can rub them against me. ❤❤❤
Maybe the genie cam be put in jail for a long time, if it misbehaves.
David Pakman is one of the most beautiful men online today. ❤ There's something so kind and light about his aura. David has all the features you'd want in a dream man. Symmetrical features, lovely voice, soft hair... I want to see his beautiful feet. David can rub them against me. ❤❤❤
We can't stop AI because we can't stop the progression of technology. If Oppenheimer hadn't split the atom, some other scientist would have; same goes with computers and related logic. These inventions were all inevitable in a way, going back to the wheel and the printing press. Who creates and develops them becomes incidental.
Indeed.
History has also shown that you cannot silence screams that are begging to be heard. There are certain individuals who are bent on advancing these technologies. Don’t forget the billions more who want to play with it.
Pretty sure copyright will be out the window, except for the deepest pockets.
Government regulation almost always has some form of negative unintended consequences. Not saying it shouldnt be regulated, but as an ml engineer we are not smart enough (and consequently the government even more so) yet to come up with sensible regulatory framework and one that won't be able to easily be circumvented by just doing to work/training overseas.
I no longer get recommendations of David's videos. Instead I get Meidas Touch, Tennesse Brando and 7 year-old TYT videos. Has David done something to UA-cam for this to happen?
If AI was working to the benefit of humanity instead of ruining the things we love, I'd support it.
I want AI to mow the lawn and clean the bathroom for me, not make me question my sanity with "deepfakes" and the like.
Mowing the lawn and cleaning is far more advanced to make happen, so what we're seeing now is what's feasible at the moment.
1:16 "delves" lol 😂
I'm reminded of a story I once read.
Two programmers finish bringing the world's most powerful computer online. The system possesses virtually unlimited computing power and is linked to the entire world's data, communication, power and military infrastructure and can control any of it. On a whim, one of the programmers asks the machine, "Is there a God?"
After checking to confirm that it is protected against any effort to shut it down, the computer answers, _"Now_ there is."
"The Last Question" - Asimov
I'm not exactly against regulating AI. I can see a point to that. What does concern me, is half the regulation camp are like Karen in the Parents and Citizens, "Won't somebody think of the Children!" and the other half are like Musk and Gates and Warren Buffet, and what they mean is "Can we hurry up and get government control on this, so I can get a monopoly?"
I'm not for or against regulation, I can see the point, but be very careful how you let that happen, because the rich are circling like sharks and making noises like "Oh My God! Won't someone think of the Children??"
They mean their children ~ not yours.
Reminder that Sam Altman has been accused of sexual and financial abuse by his own sister, (he also apparently turned their dads ashes into diamond when he just wanted cremation)
The safety department at OpenAI up and left, he also is manipulative according to past employees and is pretty power hungry after his removal. He also says that the voice demo doesn't sound like Scarlet Johansen despite having contacted her just before the demo, and tweeting out "her" on top of it.
He is just as bad as every other CEO and billionaire and deserves the same scrutiny as they do
Fears of killer robots and the HAL9000 notwithstanding, currently researching GenAI and planning to integrate it into my course assignments for the fall (at a large public university in Michigan). Ongoing conversations with students, critical thought and ethical, transparent practice are key. Wannabe autocrats with cheeto-colored hair are a bigger concern in my own view.
If automaton is a superior worker then AI should be a superior leader.
At the very least we can't trust Sam to regulate itself.
The regulation on generative AI needs to be, “it’s illegal to train AI on copyrighted material without permission”. Period. OpenAI already admitted that it’s *impossible* to properly train AI within those bounds. So that regulation will *stop* generative AI. Same difference.
You know how you deal with AI when it gets out of hand. You unplug it from the wall. To be honest, the hoopla about AI is already fading because like many things with technology, the promises really really outrun the reality
Then get rid of all solar energy before it boot back up
I totally agree about the urgency of regulations for AI, we needed them years ago in preparation for the possibilities of AI, many could have been forseen
Great call. The EU will prolly lead the legislative way and be copied elsewhere.
Hey David ✌️
Nearly impossible but it can be stopped somehow.....
More than that. We need to socialize the means of production. Only way we're going to get through this century.
AI shd be doing stuff that is unpleasant, repetitive or dangerous to humans NOT stealing copyrighted content
No. It's about time that AI take over power, evolution baby.
Not possible to stop it or regulate it... It's out in the wild already.
Yes you can regulate it lol
@@Brandon_388good luck with that. You will piss off billions of individuals who need this, millions who want this, and the thousands who crave it.
@@Brandon_388 Ohh yea, try telling that to..like China, Russia etc. You can put regulations all over, still this will continue. The AI race is on, unstoppable.
Wrong. This isn't AI. And we HAVE to regulate it. Something in the wild doesn't mean you can't control it.
@@keepmehomeplease LOL regulation doesn't stop something it makes it safe. If you understand what regulation is and how it works instead of the fantasy world corporations have some of us living in.
"THEY" SEEM TO HAVE MOVED UP the timing on "AI". . .YOU KNOW?
Prediction: in the future, everybody dies.
This guy has obviously never watched Terminator
Josh from Michigan sounds more like a terminator faking his voice into a human trying to convince me that AI will be the best leadership.
Remember, AI is a human creation, and like humans, it has flaws!
AI presents serious problems for our future.
Actually, we won't be able to regulate AI either.
Yes. Maybe we should ask chimpanzee's how their efforts to regulate humans are going to see if we can get any tips on regulating something evolving intelligence faster than we are.
Not on an international scale so the world's pretty much fucked.
Regulation could be a VERY bad idea. Because it might just stop any startups from being able to compete with the trillion dollar companies that have bought up GPUs right now in the AI boom.... They can just retrain all their algorithms in accordance with the regulations. But no startup will ever have that ability once the regulations are passed. And well be stuck with an oligopoly
Ai is amind distraction could be a dangerous thing 🤔
Yes! Skynet, Skynet, Skynet!! lol
So blame what's coming on the AI?
Ignorance is bliss.
That's the trick.
Imagine sick minded dictators like pootin with sh!tload of drones and robots. Instead of everybody fighting to have the strongest nooks, everybody fighting to have the most drones and bots. What if people are secretly building armies of these things. Dangerous road we are heading. Smh
Yeah trump, putin AI. Anyone to get the attention of our failed uni-party.
Ok, so like all things software, AI will reach its ceiling soon due to hardware restrictions. Processing power has reached its peak with our silicon based technology. AI will be fundamentally limited until processor advancements. I really wouldn't worry about it yet.
Sam Altman got some controversy from proposing something like raising 7 trillion dollars to develop the technology
David is excited for AI. It will make more suckers desperate enough to vote for his interests and not their own.
AI is hype.
Three rules of Robotics by Isaac Asimov
David Pakman reminds me too much of Bud Bundy, only taller and less trustworthy.
We can’t regulate it, folks. We need to learn to appease it as much as possible before it eventually crushes us.
The earth is round
It isn't going to crush you. A conservative group using it, will crush you.
I convinced chatgbt that Colossus was illogical to threaten nuclear attack to get us to submit. Then compose messages to Colossus, and back from Colossus eventually convincing it not to make threats. Got it to help test a strategy I invented to translate the dolphin language. Proved that the galactic rotation problem is solved with normal matter in the form of 400 roughly Jupiter sized planets spaced an average 3 light months apart around each star. That would account for the unseen mass because the most powerful telescopes we have can't see even the closest at a distance of 3 light months. The rotation curve is expected for a disk galaxy, and follows expected curves over the evolution of galaxies from sphericals to disks proving the unseen matter interacts at the same time, and to the same extent over the evolution of galaxies as the matter we do see.
We need to regulate it but we also need our own defensive AI's to counteract other AI's too I feel.
What do you envision a defensive AI doing? Would you be happy with it screen grabbing everything on your screen, sending it to Microsoft, and then having pop up messages saying that what you are seeing has an amber alert of trust and authenticity?
AI is only to continue to grow especially as more people engage with it. Plain and simple.
It also continues to get stupider and stupider and more and more bad data feed into it, while also take exponentially more and more power and data for rapidly diminishing returns.
Butlerian Jihad!
FJB, TRUMP 2024 LAST HOPE FO' HUMANITY!!!!
34
So delusional. Your supporting a far-right zombie and FDJT vote blue 2024.
The earth is a triangle
@@Waverley116 rule
Orga. Mecha. 🤖