Ketanji Brown Jackson MISSES ENTIRE POINT Of The First Amendment: Matt Taibbi On SCOTUS Case
Вставка
- Опубліковано 18 бер 2024
- Journalist Matt Taibbi weighs in on free speech being on the balance in the Supreme Court. #SCOTUS #speech
About Rising:
Rising is a weekday morning show with bipartisan hosts that breaks the mold of morning TV by taking viewers inside the halls of Washington power like never before. The show leans into the day's political cycle with cutting edge analysis from DC insiders who can predict what is going to happen. It also sets the day's political agenda by breaking exclusive news with a team of scoop-driven reporters and demanding answers during interviews with the country's most important political newsmakers.
Follow Rising on social media:
Website: Hill.TV
Facebook: HillTVLive/
Instagram: @HillTVLive
Twitter: @HillTVLive
"... having the first amendment hamstring the government." This is absolutely repugnant. That's EXACTLY why we have the first amendment. What are law schools teaching??
No, government is just another "party" with something at stake. Conservatives simply loathe the fact-based operation of agencies because they reveal unflattering things about right wing ideology and the people who endorse it.
Bjg and ketanji have literally the exact same worldview.
What else do you expect from the DEI hire?
Well, some of them do advocate it.....includling the ACLU....
The moment I heard that my eyelids nearly disappeared.
She doesn't know what a WOMAN is, NO ONE is surprised she does not know what the FIRST AMENDMENT is.
A actually watched that.
I was set back into my chair.
I'm not a biologist. Seriously.
The DNA.
PRETTY SIMPLE.
1st A.
Why is it the first Amendment in the Constitution.
Kings have Stifled speech for Centuries. And be headed their citizens for opposing them if even in thought and speech.
How does a statement like that leave your mouth as a Supreme Court Justice? This woman is a disgrace.
By that smile of her, you can tell that she's not ashamed of being an affirmative & equity direct hire of the 🤡💩 administration. 🤫🤫
She should've never been confirmed as a SCJ let alone any judge.
Bri still towing the line that SOME censorship is OK. She's exhausting.
I can't stand her I only watch the show to keep my enemies close
I used to respect her. She's intelligent. A good debater. Attractive. Once she became full-time on Rising her authoritarian mindset really came out full bore. Every time she has a counter, you can see right before Matt responds he is trying to be polite, but his eyes are also saying, "I can't believe what I'm hearing."
Yeah, Brianna hasn't heard of the doctrine regarding prior restraints. She must have missed Constitutional Law that week.
I think she gets forced to play the role of "the opposition," but I agree it is tiresome.
@@bobdavenport6127 She totally contradicted him, citing VOX!
"Having the first amendment hamstring the government."
Yeah Ketanji. That's the point.
Of, by, and for THE PEOPLE.
Could then argue that the 2nd amendment hamstrings the criminal justice system.
Hey Ketanji, now do the 13th amendment.
Dei hire at best
She’s living up to my expectations.
@@SikDigitz we wuz judging and sheeeit
Abhorrent that a Supreme Court Justice would say this!
This is what happens when skin color is prioritized over knowledge and capability.
This is what Liberals folding to Progressives gets you. A load of DEI hires (Kamala, KBJ, KJP, lipstick luggage bandit) makes your administration look like a clown show.
Recall when Sotayamor stated as fact that 100's of thousands of kids were on ventilators due to Covid. There's a trend here.
She’s an activist not a justice
she's an activist, could you imagine if Democrats got to nominate more SCJ in the future? Would be a disaster for the country
How is it possible that I was a middle school social studies teacher 25 years ago and I understand the Constitution and the purpose of free speech better than a Supreme Court Justice?! What the actual f***. God save America
Well hopefully those students remember what you taught them today.
And repeat your name to others.
God Bless your responsibility to the children
You are spot on !
Thank you for your vocation.
Because you weren't a DEI hire....
Thank you. We have the new waves of teachers and their unions teaching marxism and hatred of our Constitutional Republic and way of life.
The purpose of these hearings is to challenge arguments with difficult and at times extreme questions.
Your understanding of free speech isn’t at issue, your understanding of a Supreme Court hearing is.
Bri is the queen of "asking a question" but the question is about 70 seconds long, touches on three different subjects, and isn't really a question at all.
😡 How is this woman on the Supreme Court ???😡😡😡😡
Affirmative ac......Biden campained that he would nominate a black female...
DEI
Yes she also ruled before being on it that pedophiles were not criminals
@@jaradshaw4723 I don't think that is true, but please direct me to any information to the contrary. Thanks.
You know ....
It shows how unqualified she is for the position. It’s literally the whole point of the free speach portion of the first amendment.
It's baked into the whole thing, *before* the Bill of Rights was added.
The Constitution exists/existed to tell what the Federal Government *could* do... which does *not* include regulating people's speech, etc.
Fortunately, we had Founding Fathers who were smart enough to realize that wouldn't be enough (and it hasn't been), so some of them insisted on adding the Bill of Rights, to "double down" on it, by specifying it the other way... what they *cannot* do.
So you think anyone should be allowed to tell other people to inject bleach, swallow aquarium cleaner and take horse medication for any illness? Go for it.
Of course she's unqualified. She's in that seat because she checks boxes.
Well, No. If you understood who Biden is and what he represents, it demonstrates exactly how qualified Ketanji B Jackson is and why she was promoted to her position.
I think we're over-reaching here. She just put it forth as an argument, she didn't necessarily say that she agreed with it.
Admittedly, it's possible that she does agree with it, but steelmaning is a a thing.
How can Brianna be so wrong? This is an open and shut case if ever there was one.
Briahna is wrong all the time
When you are too emotional about social issues, you can't be logical. Don't expect her to be logical.
@@tashalorm4313 but…b-b-b-but… she’s a Supreme Court justice!!!
@@coda3208 I was referring to Brianna. For the scotus I don't think we need to say much due to the fact: she can't define a woman.
Briahna: "I admit I have not read the briefings, and I did not read the Twitter files, but here is my completely uninformed opinion on this..."
Isn't it her job to read this stuff?
DEI in action: Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson regards the Bill of Rights as an inconvenience to the government.
When they are actually born in other countries (or 1st generation) they have no understanding of how the US government works, no matter where they went to school.
She’s a perfect example. There are so many others.
The LSAC PLUS PROGRAM sucks. If you are DEI you go to law school of choice with no tests! Illiterates are now justices!
Barack Obama said the Constitution was a “troubling” thing.
@@elaineteut9579(s)he also said "we need to give up our rights to a sovereign."
Yeah good thing she took an oath to defend the Constitution otherwise she might make incredibly biased statements. Oh yeah, she just did. So, apparently she lied when she took the oath.
Briahna quoted vox as her source 😅...
That alone shows that she had no intent of looking at facts or being unbiased.
Vox is propaganda.
The classic "I'm going to dismiss your source so I don't have to make a counter argument".
@@morganghetti nope... name an actual argument that she made and I will dismiss it. The point is that she made no argument really... she simply quoted a source known to be false. Even if it was a source that tends to be honest, she should have made an actual argument via her own assessment.
She outright admitted that she did no assessment of her own.
@@morganghettiif the flat earth society proclaimed the earth is flat, and you are using them as a source of the earth being being flat, would you accept it as being credible, it dismiss it for bias?
In my seventy years on this planet the suppression of free speech is the one thing that truly frightens me.
Be afraid when 2A is clipped. We're fine because of 2A.
How come every time the government wants to keep me "safe," not that I asked, it proceeds to weaken my Bill of Rights? That does NOT keep me safe. The Bill of Rights keeps me safe.
We're not "kids" We're citizens with rights
only oligarchs have rights in this brave new world order
As are all people of the world.
The foundation came from the Bible.
When she doesn’t know what a woman is, we can’t expect her to understand the first amendment. DEI at its best!
EXACTLY. !!!!! Hard to reason. After that, She is where she is. today , “professionally” .🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰
That's a disgusting distraction from the actual issue. She was extremely well qualified for the SC which doesn't mean she is good justice just like so many white men who came before her. Your racism only obscures the real issues
The times we live in our so confusing! It's important not to restrain the government and its ability to keep us free and safe! 🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡
@@markdavis7853take a Civics class.
These statements are precisely why Judge Joe Brown says she's unqualified.
Harvard Law must be so proud of Kentanji.
They're certainly NOT proud of you.
What a f***ing shock that Bre is taking a side against free speech. LOL
Matt Taibbi is the BEST of journalism!!!
Exactly why the establishment hates him.....
EXCEPT for The Musk Interlude.
No, he sucks and Mehdi Hasan humiliated him.
Matt Taibbi, you serve your country ethically, morally, educationally by your uncompromising principles to honest journalism and always to the pursuit of truth!
Matt is the Edward R. Murrow of our time. We are lucky to have his voice.
"Educationally," spoken like someone lacking an education.
That's exactly why the establishment hates him.....
Yeah, the Edward R. Murrow who agreed to let Elon Musk spoon feed him cherry picked content for money.@@drbrubent
"Surprisingly nearly all of the colleagues seem to have completely forgotten what role the truth should have in reliable journalism!! "
They're thinking reporting can easily go without fact-basing/investigating into what took place/was 'realiter' happening..
It has become a podium for retelling opinions of important people, too often becoming thus a "reproduction-machine" for unprovable narratives! 🤦♂️😡
"Do away with the Pulitzer prize, unless you really give it to Matt Taibbi, Paul Schreyer,.. and similar outstanding players who struggle for the truth, giving a minute enumeration of what counts, affects me and you. Presenting dependable/reliable gems of important, often dissembled/hidden- away actions/events in society: something the public could unquestionably be fond of!" Such awesome investigation undoubtedly takes a lot of spine/character and courage...Thanks to God ther are still a few ones ❤️❗️🔆
[Me also would have to say "Thank you", for that's what we really need]
She should be impeached and disbarred.
How is she considered liberal. Once upon a time the liberals were in favor of free speech.
BJG quoting VOX as a source pretty much sums up her bias.
I'm guessing that she is overly fond of Jackson.
She is a DEI graduate from Harvard
She is a Harvard graduate. Ftfy.
EXACTLY!!!
😂
I was shocked to hear a Supreme Court Justice suggest the free speech of American citizens should be censored...WOW! JUST WOW!
I'm not surprised at all. The court of supreme injustice & corruption serves the oligarchy ONLY, just as the other branches do. Enemies of the people, all
I’m not
REPORTED ;-)
Private companies can censor, governments can not.
She was chosen for such a moment as this! The moment she couldn't answer what a woman is, I knew from that moment she was hand picked by the swamp for "great things". Taking down free speech has been within government sights since forever but last few years its now within their grasp. Yeah not shocked was waiting when the shoe would drop as to her role towards the demoncratic authoritarian regime. Now it's plain as day.
This is disturbing. Truly disturbing to see a Supreme Court Justice who lacks even the most basic understanding of what a constitutional republic is.
She won't define what a woman is, why would you think she would actually understand free speech.
It's a little sad that she was appointment to the SCOTUS and she doesn't understand the 1A.
A little!?!?
It's criminal that she was appointed.
It’s the style of the new SC justice. They’re appointed for their politics, not their judicial expertise.
The LSAC PLUS PROGRAM sucks. If you are DEI you go to law school of choice with no tests! Illiterates are now justices!
It's profoundly sad and tragic. She is the tip of the spear. The US is finished.
Bri goes on and admits she hasn’t read the case….and Matt runs circles around her and very adeptly and expertly stands his ground
Bri has spent too much time in academia. Anyone who graduates from an institution like an Ivy League law school tends to be book smart but lacks common sense.
All she needs to know is that she has to defend the DEI hire. To her black people are never wrong
If she hasn't read the case maybe she shouldn't comment on the case.
Bri the liberal demon says, “let me play devil’s advocate”. 😂
But she has a summary... from VOX!
It wasn't soft pressure, they were threatened and harassed, Bri isn't playing the Devil's advocate, she is playing right alongside the Devil.
As soon as she said “playing devil’s advocate” I was like, “yeah right”
It's not possible for the federal government to make "suggestions" without an implied threat. The power differential is so great that no private actor will feel they can refuse.
It’s why any boss who implies that a subordinate should do something, like sleep with them for a promotion, is considered coercive and to be abusing their power.
“I just need 11,780 votes.”
The "bully pulpit" argument by Matt is THE answer. Censorship is not. If the government disagrees with the content of someone's speech counter it and make your case.
The Essence of DEBATE.
I learned that I'm highschool.
Rebuttal with opposition of facts.
NOT FEELINGS.
The quote by Madison ? " if men were angels they wont need a government " the government isn't angelic ,Still need the bill of rights
Official endorsement of "Nice shop you got here. Shame if something happened to it."
Exactly. Biden Mafia
Bri suddenly living in fantasy land trying to argue that if we can't find any overt specifically stated threats, then it's totally fine and the govt would never use any other forms of pressure or that the companies would never need to fear such pressure.
Straight Gangsta
The power imbalance between social media companies and the government is so great that even “soft” pressure is wholly unconstitutional.
Me:Does Bri have anything actual to say? Also me: Actually, no.
😂👍💯
How can we have a Supreme Court Justice who doesn't understand the role of 1st Amendment regarding the government? These people are supposed to protect and defend the constitution and We The People not support government to exert more influence and power!
Republicans expressed concern that she was not competent for the job, but she is a product of the 'we need to pack the court' era where the goal was just to get bodies on the bench.
I'm sure she & they understand...but they are there to serve the oligarchs, and nothing else. They are enemies of the people. wake up
It's a Bolshevik revolution.
She is first snd foremost an “ACTIVIST”, she went into law to gain power to force her activism and “make systemic change for the cause of social justice”, she’s probably a soros pawn, and should never be anywhere near the levers of power. And no, she not only doesn’t understand the purpose of the 1st Amendment, if she did she would be completely opposed to it.
Love when Matt is on
Yes. First time I've watched this show on a day other than Friday in ages.
Bri went from "playing devils advocate" because she knows it's wrong or taboo to go against the 1st ammendment. Then later in the episode says "I do think". She does this consistently. It's in her nature to manipulate to push her narrative.
sickening, how have we gone so far astray... everyday more freedoms are in jeopardy or lost, how easily we have forgotten what freedom is and that once a freedom is taken away it's almost impossible to get it back.
It's all on purpose, and watching so many choose to be useful idiots - who clap like seals, while drool drips down their face, chanting DEI slogans, is so very sad.
Anyone else remember Bri’s little tantrum’s when Matt Taibbi first started exposing all this with the Twitter Files? How, no matter what he found, her response was always “what about Trump?”. At least she’s consistent with her partisanship.
The Twitter files? LOL. That was a complete fiasco for grifting lisping Matt.
Trump did tell Twitter to remove Chrissy Teigen’s tweet.
Didnt the Democrats say that Censorship is good for Free Speech?
The Democrats and the left of today are open advocates of censorship. It's shocking.
They definitely implied that lack of censorship is a threat to democracy.
They still are
Fed Govt Agencies. The "democrats" are just a front organization for Fed Govt Agencies. Agencies like USDA and FDA. DOD? NIH? ATF? CDC? More Fed Govt Agencies. Remember lockdowns? FDA? CDC? Obvious, right? @@drisgorilla5382
Funny how we had little or no censorship for decades and Democracy seemed to do just fine...@@drisgorilla5382
"Can you define what a First Amendment is?" "No I can't. I'm not a legal expert."
Lol, is this a joke? What do you mean you can’t define what the Fiirst Amendment is? The First Amendment provides that Congress make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting its free exercise. It protects freedom of speech, the press, assembly, and the right to petition our Government!!
Matt Taibbi is the reason I watch The Hill. And Glen Greenwald too.
As usual it sounds a lot like Bri's prime directive is - 'must defend other DEI beneficiaries whatever the cost'.
Based on the provided transcript, there is no explicit mention of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) in the discussion. The focus of the conversation appears to be primarily on First Amendment rights, government coercion, and the role of social media companies in regulating speech. Therefore, there doesn't seem to be a direct connection to DEI topics in this particular discussion.
@@mikahundindei is a tool of the CIA and govt in conjunction with major corporations. Which is the topic at hand.
You have a very basic view of the English language if you think a control f search means anything about topic discussion.
You're making this comment on UA-cam, where we talk about "grape* because the actual word can get you censored. Learn what a homonym is.
yep black people can not be wrong
@mikahundin this has to be the dumbest most pretentious comment of the day lol you don't have to explicitly mention something for it to be a factor to consider in a discussion. We all know people who weren't qualified that got jobs because of DEI or affirmative action. And considering this video is about KJBs incompetence, that's kind of the point
@mikahundin it is implied that dei is impose to 'protect' people, but is really to curtail speech. Legal arguments include implied affects, the implications of express text is actually what legal argument/law is about.
You killed it Matt….wonderful expert commentary
Hey, Justice Brown, it is NOT the government's job to know what is best for the people, and therefore do what they want. That's a nanny state or better yet a totalitarian state!!!!
Scary hearing that from a member of SCOTUS. Great to hear from Matt.
Repressive acts of governments are often shrouded in “we must protect the people.”
Like gun control , climate change and the rona
Yes, and notice how obvious it is that we call it "CONTRADICTORY" ! WE THE PEOPLE have got to claim our JURISDICTION ! ! WE THE PEOPLE are the supreme court of this Republic.
Like whats now happening in the NYC subway.
We're here to protect you.
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
I watched a video where a cop tackles a 19 year old off his bike because he didn't have a light and that was dangerous 😮
Nicely put. And now "moderation" of speech is the softly weaponized language of censorship. I'd love to see the distinction between them where free speech is not curtailed in anyway...
WHY DO YOU THINK DOCTORS SUPPORTED THE COVID BS. BECAUSE YOU CANT BE A PRACTICING DOCTOR WITHOUT THE GOVERNMENTS SAY SO AKA LICENSE.
Doctors are scientists and so they heed facts, evidence, and vaccination. Science-illiterate people say what you say.
@@user-oc2qk3er5r but most practicing physicians were doing what they were told because they had to if they wanted to practice. There wasn't some gravy train keeping them attached to the vaccine narrative other than losing their careers.
It was the money
💯💯💯🎯🎯🎯
I worked in the medical field for a long time, and you'd be shocked by how many things doctors say without any evidence at all. For example, how effective is hand-washing and masks, REALLY? Nobody knows, it's just been repeated so much that people accept it. I'm not saying these things are bad, mind you, I'm simply saying some aspects of medicine literally haven't changed in 500 years because little actual research has ever been done.
Bri showing her authoritarian streak.
💯👍
Soft pressure? When the WH sends you a letter, you call that 'soft pressure' Brie?
Brianna, the governments preference should have no consequence on what you're allowed to post, share or publish. No matter how you try to talk around it fire her. Geez
Every time I hear Robbie start to speak, I hear, "I feel this and that way, but I'm afraid of Bri, so I'll just say this".
I think Bri is part owner or has a very strong influence in this company because Robbie shakes in his boots when is petrified to stand up to her.
@@tomsmith2340 Very strong influence!
@tomsmith2340 Explains the lack of balance. No wonder it sucks.....
BJG, your final question simply ignores the very thorough answer Matt gave you when you asked it the first time - read the case, not Vox. I thought you were a former lawyer.
Matt is the Man, His Dad was a loved Reporter here in Boston,
Briannas role is indistinguishable from Bernie sanders.
Just vaguely defending state power over you with cosmically ungrounded claims and statements of feeling.
So Schumer's office leaned on Bri but she's still soft on that behaviour. Job hunting I guess.
Soft pressure? If the govt suggests it.. its not a suggestion
The DEI hire defends the DEI hire
I caught the "soft pressure" reference as well ! Bri is exasperatingly duplicitous!!!
Uhhhh this is America. If the government suggests something, it's usually a suggestion. Matt Taibbi himself explains within this interview that he understand that there's such a thing as soft-pressure and suggestion.
Soft pressure, as in suasion, or a persuasive argument, is "soft" in comparison with the "hard" pressure of compulsion, or brute force.
That's one valence. Another is that it matters a great deal whether such pressure is being applied publicly or covertly.
Indeed. This shouldn't be happening and the people trying it should be jailed for treason against the bill of rights and the constitution.
Bri: my associates didn’t demand you pay them money in order to not burn your store down. They just said they’d like you to pay them some money and that it’d be a shame if something were to burn your store down.
I mean it's fine to have freedom of speech but you don't want the government to be unable to tell people what to think, say and hear 😂. Sounds legit
Does anybody really believe that the government can call a person and say "Hey no pressure but..." and that not be understood as "If you don't do X your life might get more difficult."
It's an absurd question.
My boss can't ask me to do something directly with out causing pressure
Everything they do is done at the point of a (not so) metaphorical gun.
@@TheBaumcm Yep, 100% coercion and force.
The government is the mafia.
The entire basis of the Constitution is limit what the MAJORITY can do.
Exactly! We live in a Constitutional Democracy. The minority has protections and rights that the majority can not take away.
That is the fundamental basis of the Bill of Rights. A lot of the remainder of the Constitution conveys powers to the "majority."
No. the constitution promotes plurality and balances power based on a system of checks on power, it doesn't limit what the majority can do ihnerently.
@@dashx1103 you are right it's the bill of rights that defines what it means to be free.
A balance of power! one person's rights are as valid as 1,000 people's rights
Let's be realistic: no one conceivably believes that Ms Jackson is qualified/competent enough to sit on the Supreme Court.
Matt is a True American!!!😇🧡👍
God bless you Matt!!!😇👍
" All the government did was make them an offer they can't refuse. What's the big deal?"
There is no problem Bri, the government can not sensor speech period. Does not matter if the speech is true or not.
That is until it is affecting you personally, where are you going to run to when that happens, yer mommy!?
Unless the supreme court rules otherwise. The DEI hire will vote to rule otherwise
But I as a private individual can correct your spelling.
Love Matt thank you having him on,he is a freedom fighter period
She thinks it’s the government’s job to not only curtail free speech, but to decide what speech to curtail. How would the government know what speech to censor, if someone wasn’t making decisions about what to allow and what to censor. Censoring all speech would be bad, censoring some speech is even worse.
More Matt Taibbi! He is the king of truth.
This is incredibly frightening!
"The company's choice to succumb to soft pressure"
Whether the government states "Do what we tell you." or "Do what we tell you!" does not matter.
She couldn’t tell you what a woman is. Do you think she understands the first amendment?
If the government is talking directly to you for any reason, and you’re not scared, you’re a fool.
That’s the problem with the average American citizen, they’ve been brain washed into compliance
“Where the people fear the government you have tyranny. Where the government fears the people you have liberty." - John Basil Barnhill
Soft pressure from the federal govt is an oxymoron.
The government “making its opinion known” is more or less the same as a mafioso saying "sure would be a shame if something were to happen to it".
EXACTLY!
As long as you viewed Trump’s tweets and his phone call in Georgia the same way.
This could be one of the worst supreme court decisions in decades.
Chilling.
It is welcome to hear from Matt again.
Bri-Ketanji school of thought: "It's not about Gov't pressure it's about Others GIVING IN to Gov't's pressure." Me:😳
It’s a bit like saying “the parents are at fault because they paid the ransom the kidnappers demanded.”
Where do you rank “I just need 11,780 votes”? Or when he called Monica Palmer and told her not to certify the election and he’d pay her lawyer fees?
@@Geewasright your comment has nothing to do with the subject of this video or the comment here.
@@chipsterb4946 - It has everything to do with government pressure and exposing how your opinion of it depends on who is leading the government.
@@Geewasright you could not be more wrong. My opinions relating to preserving our First Amendment rights have *nothing* to do with who is running the government. I object to federal government officials censoring speech regardless of whether Democrats, Republicans, capital “c” Communists, or actual Fascists are in power.
Do you think censorship is “OK” if, and only if, your preferred politicians are in power? That is NOT what the First Amendment says, nor should it be.
Ketanji Brown Jackson is a prime example of woke equity, chosen not on merit but on woke agenda. Meritocricy did not apply here when she was appointed
How so? Where was she lacking in terms of "merit?"
I dunno, maybe the inability to define a woman . 😂😂😂😂
@@andrewsidelo8221 So no serious answer. Got it.
@dashx1103 you don't believe that being able to define substantive (aa well as objective) reality as a Supreme Court Justice is important?...🤦♂️
@@coblogan75 Not sure what you are asking. Are you saying that the Justice can't "define substantive reality?' If so, set out your thesis and I'll consider it.
There is no way to distinguish the line between soft pressure and an overt threat. A scowl from someone in power could be a way to communicate a threat. Because there is no way to distinguish that line, soft pressure by government agents must go as well.
Trump’s phone call in Georgia?
"Terrifying" - exactly! You can't have a woke circus without clowns - and boy do we have clowns - even on the Supreme Court.
Judges please uphold the constitution and our free speech!
Congratulations BRG! You are on record with the longest sentence in the history of man! Subject/object light years apart. A filibuster unto itself!
No sh**, I could have read War and Peace 2x by the time she got to the end of that meaningless word salad. Few big words thrown in to make herself feel like she's such an intellectual.
@@alemswazzu
Nicely said. Thank you!
That judge doesn't understand the constitution is there to restrict gov. overreach and not the other way around.🙄
“Kids don’t do it.” She’s dumbing down free speech for children, which shows her what she thinks of the populace.
The government shouldn’t have an opinion, they exist to serve us and keep their mouths shut! Are we in charge or are they?
What do you think?
Soft pressure where government can choose to investigate you if you speak out. LOL
A Supreme Court Justice. She can't even define a 'woman'. What did we all expect? What a joke.
the main responsibility of the federal government is to ensure the Bill of Rights, any other function is optional
Matt Taibi: Briahna, that's a good question?
Really Matt?
The first 'question' went on for approximately 1min 42secs.
Bet you couldn't repeat it.
Why does BJG do this?
She makes a point, meanders onto a semi-related point mid-speech & then ends with an unrelated question?
Thank god you did that work I was going to comment on how long her questions are, I would have no clue where to start when answering and I feel like that’s done on purpose so nothing can be attacked head on.
The best is when Greg Lukinoff said, "I have no response to your comment."
Why would Brianna be threatened by the correct use of the first amendment?
And Supreme Court justices make mistakes sometimes, just not on fundamental issues like what the first amendment is in there to protect.
It’s not there to protect the government, it is there to protect the population from the government.
She didn't know what a woman was. Why would anyone be surprised that she doesn't understand the meaning of the 1st amendment 🤷♂️
We need civil libertarians on the supreme court asap
Several are, but not enough. If trump is elected, sotomator and roberts retire, and maybe the other democrat appointees, it could be done.
We need to stop selecting judges based upon their gender or the color of their skin. Competence and integrity should be the determining factors.
@MIKEMIKE-te2dt while i agree that race/gender should not the only qualifications considered when hiring for any occupation, this is not a DEI issue. The issue is that our politicians typically nominate people who seek to preserve government and corporate power instead of civil liberties
@@Kshthymyla Sotomayor aint retiring in 4 years, that bat has a good 15-20 years left.
@@KshthymylaElecting Trump would only continue to hasten the SC seats for sale structure we are currently in.
Diversity hire doesn't understand something we literally teach in elementary school social studies.
No! We are not biologists, so how can we know! 🤣🤣
@@scillyautomaticit’s embarrassing that she was right about that and half the country didn’t understand it. Tribalism knows no brains.
@@CharlieTWilbury No, myfriend. We DO understand it. That's the problem. You people think that no one understands you and your little games. The gig is up.
@@CharlieTWilbury Imagine thinking you need to be a biologist to know what a woman is.. lol
@@VTAcraft Imagine not understanding that from a legal perspective, that's the only path to certainty.
Wow. I agree with Robbie. Bri is a danger to the 1st Amendment on this one. The SC is about to shut down her podcast, but she can't understand this.
"Kids, it's not safe."
The government is not my daddy.
Bcuz we know the government never lies….lol
Bri : "We should really just conform to banana Republic status."
Basically
Shocking that an Affirmative Action justice selected solely based on skin color and genitalia could be unqualified.
Affirmative Action Jackson. DEI at it’s best.
So in response to "soft federal pressure" social media companies can just "softly" say No or what? How would that go?
That would be like me telling my mom “no” as a kid. 😂