Ask yourself, which is a better movie: '28 Days Later' or 'I Am Legend'? They are practically very similar, and both are great, but one stands out IMO because of CGI, or lack thereof. Yes, I prefer 28 Days *_because_* it had almost zero CGI.
George Lucas saw visual effects as a way to push what storytelling can do visually on screen. The problem is the mentality is "we'll fix it later in post" instead of putting something incredible on screen to blow the audiences minds. I think whatever media works for the creator but there's a fine difference between George's approach and modern cinema.
Sorry to break it to you, but George himself lost sight of what made filmmaking special. The prequels are toy commercials riddled with an insane over usage of green screen and CGI.
You gotta love Quentin if for no other reason than that he sticks to his guns and doesn't pander to people. Not only that but he tries to go about it in the nicest most reasonable way possible. Very admirable quality for anyone to possess.
This is why I love Quentin.. His love of the genuine art of making movies....Some directors love filmmaking and don't want to take any shortcuts if possible....
My issue with most modern superhero movies is how they’re made and the fact that most of them all feel kinda the same. They’re mostly focused on action/spectacle and teasing future movies and big events rather than crafting unique stories. Plus most of them lack artistic vision from the director cuz the studios are the ones making the decisions
I just disagree with that. Some are more spectacle but there are also a lot which have great character drama's at their heart. Adding spectacle doesn't necessarily take away from everything else.
I would mostly agree to that. The problem ia that the studio's main concern is to put out as many of them as possible, so instead of directors wanting to tell a story and getting a studio to finance it, it's studios searching for directors to attach to whaver they want to do, which is totally killing any sort of creative freedom, especially with the rate at which they want to release the movies
It's so strange because back in 2009 when Tarantino was naming his 17 favorite films since 1992 and he enthusiastically praised Unbreakable, it made me go back and rewatch it and for the past 12 years, it's been my favorite film of all time.
The Carpenter "The Thing" is masterclass in practical effects. And that one still holds up today. My nephew crapped his breeches when I screened it for him. Marvel may be fun, but those movies have time stamps that expire.
@@holden6104 the last one of the avengers films I remember was civil war. It became a bland mess of cgi from then for me. I only really got into them late in the game anyway. People were shocked I hadn't seen the avengers in about 2014.
One of Tarantino's favorite movies he said in an interview was Unbreakable which was a superhero movie. You can definitely make superhero movies that are incredibly captivating just most don't try to
Yea, it's one of mine. I think the only (forgivable) letdown was the ending revelation. It was so close to being great, but I'm unsure how to attain that.
I was enjoying the run of Marvel movies that ended with Endgame. They had soul and fun but since then it’s become messy, badly written and directed. They had their run and it is what it is. But for the test of time you can’t beat a Scorsese or Tarantino movie.
It’s hilarious how every esteemed and noteworthy living director openly despises Marvel movies. My favorite quote is from Francis Ford Coppola when he was asked if he agreed with Scorsese’s take that marvel movies weren’t cinema, he said ‘No, not only are they not cinema, they are despicable.’
I get the most insane looks when people ask me if I went to see the new superhero movie and I tell them no and explain I just don’t find them entertaining today
When we talk about “superhero movies” it’s not about whether it has a character with superhuman powers in it. Its a label for a very specific genre that puts spectacle, applause moments and comic references over human emotion. That’s what Scorsese was talking about.
There hasn’t been a superhero movie that you can call a “real movie” since Dark Knight. That was a studio letting an auteur filmmaker use one of their most valuable properties to tell his story his way. It is memorable from front to back, and you can show it to a kid or a senior citizen and they can enjoy it on its own merits.
I totally agree. I haven’t seen the last couple of Avengers or other Marvel movies. They all feel very formulaic and similar to me. I think people crave original shows.
Not really it is just because they share the same universe, that brought them huge success. people only being negative because they a re popular, if they were not there would be no fuss.
but he just said they are not cinema, if you are having a cinematic experience watching them, and it gets you to the cinema, then it is cinema through and through. The fact one is not into them doesnt mean that they are not cinema.
Big fan of Wolf of Wall Street, big fan of every single Tarantino film & a big big fan of Marvel. Yes you can be a fan for all 3. Why don’t we stop putting each other down & let people enjoy what they want to enjoy.
It’s not so much about artistic tastes and elitism so much it is about the way that superheroes have monopolized movie making and movie culture. There is almost no diversity in films. Films that are more auteur driven and art house get small runs or no run at all (if it’s from another country)
Watching this absolute genius transform as he finds love and adjusts to fatherhood is a beautiful thing for an empath to witnesses. I thought i was impossible to admire him more. I was wrong.
I thought Django Unchained was a superhero movie. Especially when Django confronts the Brittle Brothers and he had that blue suit on. It reminded me of Superman..That was so great.
You thought wrong. Super Heroes didn't invent heroes of myth with seemingly extraordinary abilities. Super Heroes are a very specific thing. They are costumed vigilantes.
@@schen7913 It's not that difficult. Django is not a super hero movie whatsoever, and Tarantino wasn't at all inspired by super Heroes when he made it. Epic revenge stories predate super Heroes.
I think you can make a superhero movie cinema. It’s just that the big studios won’t take many risks. So for me it isn’t superhero movie vs. not superhero movie but big studio movie vs. creative/personal movie.
Cinema requires a certain presence...a sense of pure being. It also shouldn't be informational because then it just turns into visualized literature. Essentially, the opposite of that is baked into the superhero genre.
The Dark Knight Trilogy to me is the exception to the “superhero movies are not cinema” rule. That world that Nolan built perfectly combined gritty realism with comic book theatricality. He found a balance. There’s nothing theme-parkish about his Gotham. His trilogy, The Dark Knight especially, are more crime movies than they are comic book movies. And other than Nolan’s trilogy, there have only been a few comic book movies to break that mold: Joker, Watchmen, and Matt Reeve’s Batman all handled delving into the psychological and ideological aspects of their characters well.
I don't think it's a hard line to call something cinematic or not, nor should it ever be a measure of quality. I do think there's something to be said about which movies actually seem to be made by a director instead of a studio. Most of the MCU just feels incredibly homogenised and the film-making is just... capturing footage of what is happening, not so much actual shot choices.
Green screen movie where the actor has to figure out how to make money without having a mental breakdown in an all green room in a sexy superhero outfit
it doesn't matter how you do it, it only matter what's in the final product. What matters also is that you do not realise it's a special effect because of how realistic it. Special effects are means to and end, they are not the show.
Movies made for the soul purpose of pushing a franchise and selling toys are not cinema. A good superhero movie made from the heart will (probably) be universally loved by everyone.
It was in the works for a Tarantino Star Trek movie, I’m a huge Tarantino and Star Trek fan, but it fell through for some reason, I’m so disappointed, I KNOW it would be such an epic movie.
It felt weird that at least we could understand what the interviewed wanted to say, this show is about to ask 3000 questions without complete any, I enjoyed it!
What I love about Tarantino is the fact that he is truly passionate about films and making them. At this point I don’t get the impression that he is motivated by money.
Both types of movies are good. I do enjoy good stories and whoever can translate that to a good watch I will watch it. Tarantino's movies are awesome and have great stories, action, what more would you want?
The real issue is that terantino creates a story while marvel and dc movies are more about the effects and less about the deep meaning and quality of the narrative , of the storytelling
This is a generalisation. Especially regarding DC. What effects did Joker or The Batman have? Both were shot using actual sets or on location, both focused on story.
Cinema isn't primarily about storytelling though. That's just illustrated literature. Cinema is about conveying undefinable feelings, which superhero films don't do.
Hillarious thing about that stament were that people “agreed” with Scorsese mostly because they wanted to sound sophisticated and smart while they probably wouldn’t enjoy single movie from 40s or 50s that Martin praises often. Quentin gave Reasonable argument, it’s a generational thing similar to westerns at the time. Personally, MCU movies have been mostly great especially in Infinity Saga and some are geniuenly cinematic and artistic achivement whether people want to admit it or not🤷🏻♂️
Im sure other people have said it, but I also dont think he would jive with the amount of control, oversight, rewriting, editing (the kind of editing where you totally change the movie) and pandoring that most disney/marvel or dc movies do nowadays. Even if he agreed to direct it, it would likely be chopped up and frankensteined into something barely recognizable as Tarantino.
Let Tarintino do a practical effect superhero movie PLEASE. Would've loved to have him for Blade. Cant do Ghost Rider without special effects but I would love to see that.
Capture it on film! Great mantra. Oldschool is best I believe too. Its way more interesting and sparks a lot more ingenuity. Whatever it takes! Apone! Absolute BadAsses! Pack em in. Get in there!
It's not really Hollywood's fault, it's the public. In previous generations adults generally did not watch superhero movies. If they did, is was when they took their kids. Now the #1 movie genre for adults is superheros. A genre that was intended for children and adolescents. Adults are more infantilized than ever before
Stream the FULL interview now on SiriusXM: sxm.app.link/HSTarantino
Practical effects are what made movies great. Advancements in CGI has helped the industry immensely but without a doubt it is overused.
Ask yourself, which is a better movie: '28 Days Later' or 'I Am Legend'?
They are practically very similar, and both are great, but one stands out IMO because of CGI, or lack thereof.
Yes, I prefer 28 Days *_because_* it had almost zero CGI.
It's not a surprise that some of the best and most celebrated Marvel movies use Practical effects very well.
Well said. The shining example of this for me is the difference between the Lord of the Rings and The Hobbit.
In Dune they used both practical and CGI and they even used practical effects as a physical marker for the CGI to make it all look more realistic.
has it really helped though? certainly monetarily.
George Lucas saw visual effects as a way to push what storytelling can do visually on screen. The problem is the mentality is "we'll fix it later in post" instead of putting something incredible on screen to blow the audiences minds. I think whatever media works for the creator but there's a fine difference between George's approach and modern cinema.
Exactly! Instead of fixing it in post, make it look amazing on the set first, to the best of your capabilities, and then ENHANCE it in post, not fix.
George Lucas got full of himself
@@Courier_333 No he just has a different vision.
Lucas abandoned that mentality by the time the sequels came about.
Sorry to break it to you, but George himself lost sight of what made filmmaking special. The prequels are toy commercials riddled with an insane over usage of green screen and CGI.
You gotta love Quentin if for no other reason than that he sticks to his guns and doesn't pander to people. Not only that but he tries to go about it in the nicest most reasonable way possible. Very admirable quality for anyone to possess.
OR that he says minor sex is a minor offense makes sense he say it since he spent a lot on Epstein's Island 🤷
This is why I love Quentin.. His love of the genuine art of making movies....Some directors love filmmaking and don't want to take any shortcuts if possible....
You probably love him too bc he said minor sex is a minor offense and spent a lot of time on Epstein's Island
My issue with most modern superhero movies is how they’re made and the fact that most of them all feel kinda the same. They’re mostly focused on action/spectacle and teasing future movies and big events rather than crafting unique stories. Plus most of them lack artistic vision from the director cuz the studios are the ones making the decisions
I just disagree with that. Some are more spectacle but there are also a lot which have great character drama's at their heart. Adding spectacle doesn't necessarily take away from everything else.
Thats just wrong
@@Flingftw Well, that's just my opinion.
You should check out The Batman.. It's a good exception to the norm.
I would mostly agree to that. The problem ia that the studio's main concern is to put out as many of them as possible, so instead of directors wanting to tell a story and getting a studio to finance it, it's studios searching for directors to attach to whaver they want to do, which is totally killing any sort of creative freedom, especially with the rate at which they want to release the movies
I'm starting to side with Scorsese, the more I think about it.
He wasn't wrong!
100%
It’s not a hard decision to make
Dark knight series I would consider an exception. At the least The Dark Knight movie itself. That is not a superhero movie, that is a crime film
@@sukottoshinobe7360 yea
It's so strange because back in 2009 when Tarantino was naming his 17 favorite films since 1992 and he enthusiastically praised Unbreakable, it made me go back and rewatch it and for the past 12 years, it's been my favorite film of all time.
That wasn't really a standard super hero movie though.
@@collinsmcrae well said👍
Unbreakable isn't marvel or DC. That's really what they mean when they say "super hero movies"
@@collinsmcrae It’s best described as “what if Superman didn’t know he was Superman”
Unbreakable is not a super hero movie.
A Tarantino Punisher film would be epic
That would be amazing
Good point
Him and Robert Rodriguez doing it. Epic
No
@@ericfelds6291 yes
The Carpenter "The Thing" is masterclass in practical effects. And that one still holds up today. My nephew crapped his breeches when I screened it for him. Marvel may be fun, but those movies have time stamps that expire.
There is so much saturation that every movie becomes forgettable true.
@@holden6104 the last one of the avengers films I remember was civil war. It became a bland mess of cgi from then for me. I only really got into them late in the game anyway.
People were shocked I hadn't seen the avengers in about 2014.
No they don't
@@salarzx62090they already did
And nothing really even comes close really. Ahead of its time doesn’t do it justice
Greatness of Scorsese. Gave a little statement in 2019, almost 4 years later people still taking about it.
The statement wasn't little...
If only they had talked about the movie he was actually promoting at the time.
I honestly can't remember which movie it was.
@@manikantasrao7868 Marvel’s Endgame I think
It was short not little
@@manikantasrao7868 popularity ≠ substance
Could you imagine the solid dialogue scripts would be if Tarantino directed a Marvel movie 🤣
It would be 5 hours long.
Tarantino would be better on DC since they are not afraid of hard R movies.
Marvel wouldn't let him do that, that's what he said in an interview once, he said they wouldn't let him make the movie he would want to make
They should get him to write and direct an episode for The Boys. They wouldn’t limit his creativity.
They would be coherent and worth watching
I love Quentin, every interview he does it is just a joy to listen to !
he is Taratinoooob. he wants shoot on film when we have digitel era! what a weird!!!
@@SoyAntonioGaming?
@@Kabal39 he film VHS insted of use digital. he dont go wit times.
@@SoyAntonioGaming so? Why should he
@@Kabal39 digital beter
I’d watch a Tarantino superhero movie with all practical effects
Perhaps he should make the Blade movie.
Hellboy....
I'll watch anything he'll makes. 🤣
Give me a Tarantino directed Ghost Rider. Just full on violence
I think that he would make an all time Ninja Turtles movie
One of Tarantino's favorite movies he said in an interview was Unbreakable which was a superhero movie. You can definitely make superhero movies that are incredibly captivating just most don't try to
Yea, it's one of mine. I think the only (forgivable) letdown was the ending revelation. It was so close to being great, but I'm unsure how to attain that.
I was enjoying the run of Marvel movies that ended with Endgame. They had soul and fun but since then it’s become messy, badly written and directed. They had their run and it is what it is. But for the test of time you can’t beat a Scorsese or Tarantino movie.
I agree, Marvel movies lost theirsoul after Endgame.
I agree. But I liked the last Spiderman, and Dr Strange movie's.
I agree 100%. I definitely feel the superhero fatigue at this point.
I started to feel MCU become weirder after Ragnarok
I stopped giving a shit after age of ultron
Tarantino always makes a good point. I totally get where he's coming from and I'm a fan of comic book movies.
It’s hilarious how every esteemed and noteworthy living director openly despises Marvel movies. My favorite quote is from Francis Ford Coppola when he was asked if he agreed with Scorsese’s take that marvel movies weren’t cinema, he said ‘No, not only are they not cinema, they are despicable.’
I think it's not just the movies, but the importance studios place on box office, and the frequency that they get released.
@@Ruylopez778 it’s all of the above
Actually just Coppola despise them, neither Scorsese of Tarantino do so
It's hilarious how everything you just said is wrong
I think Tarantino would make a great Batman movie.
Specifically a rated R one.
No holding back, full on dark and twisted.
I don't think he will get Batman
I disagree
He hates Batman lol
He was supposed to make a Star Trek movie, but it fell through
He will be better suited for The Punisher
so tarantino isn't talking about superhero movies per se; he's talking about franchise property movies pushing newer stories out of the market.
Not newer. Smaller
Practical effects is where it’s at.
TLOTR trilogy vs Hobbit springs to mind.
I get the most insane looks when people ask me if I went to see the new superhero movie and I tell them no and explain I just don’t find them entertaining today
Tarantino directing a Blade movie would be the best thing ever
Quentin is a Marvel comics fan himself. I'd love to see him make use of obscure Marvel characters into his own movie interpretation.
I think The Boys really did the genre Justice. The show is Batshit insane and I love it.
Homelander is one of the best written and acted characters in recent history.
its actually counter genre
It’s a deconstruction of the superhero genre
The whole point of the show is " what if superheroes were edgy"
the boys and invincible
He kinda did make a superhero movie, two of them, actually, starring Uma Thurman.
That's a good point.
All of his films has hero's and villains. No special powers tho
When we talk about “superhero movies” it’s not about whether it has a character with superhuman powers in it. Its a label for a very specific genre that puts spectacle, applause moments and comic references over human emotion. That’s what Scorsese was talking about.
@@freem8son86 None of them are required to do that. You can do both - have comic references and deep emotions.
Actually 3. Django unchained is a super hero movie too.
There hasn’t been a superhero movie that you can call a “real movie” since Dark Knight.
That was a studio letting an auteur filmmaker use one of their most valuable properties to tell his story his way. It is memorable from front to back, and you can show it to a kid or a senior citizen and they can enjoy it on its own merits.
Logan or The Batman, maybe?
I guess you haven't seen Daredevil. It's a TV show, but it still counts.
Good joke 🤣
@@ExtraQuestionableContentno it doesn’t
@@ExtraQuestionableContent not movie.
I think he didn't want to say he agreed with Scorsese but that's really what he thought.
Lol.. especially Marvel they all look same
He sees both sides of the conversation. QT can't 100 agree with Scorcese because his catalogue is built on embracing genre troupes.
I totally agree. I haven’t seen the last couple of Avengers or other Marvel movies. They all feel very formulaic and similar to me. I think people crave original shows.
Genre fiction is all formulaic, genius.
I wonder what he thinks about The Lord of the Rings trilogy. They're personally my favourite movies of all time.
“A poor mans cinema”
They're primarily a movie adaption of the books though.
I am a millennial and I am with Scorsese... Marvel "Movies" are just TV Episodes of a big 10 episode Season shown on a big screen
So what? They are that and they’re also entertaining, I enjoy them.
Yep. And that doesn't remotely invalidate them.
Not really it is just because they share the same universe, that brought them huge success.
people only being negative because they a re popular, if they were not there would be no fuss.
but he just said they are not cinema, if you are having a cinematic experience watching them, and it gets you to the cinema, then it is cinema through and through. The fact one is not into them doesnt mean that they are not cinema.
That's what Marvel movies are and why they don't compare to the DCEU as cinema.
I love listening to Tarantino talking about movies. What a legend.
Big fan of Wolf of Wall Street, big fan of every single Tarantino film & a big big fan of Marvel.
Yes you can be a fan for all 3. Why don’t we stop putting each other down & let people enjoy what they want to enjoy.
This
It didn't seem to me that he was putting anything down other than saying it wasn't his preference.
It’s not so much about artistic tastes and elitism so much it is about the way that superheroes have monopolized movie making and movie culture. There is almost no diversity in films. Films that are more auteur driven and art house get small runs or no run at all (if it’s from another country)
@@guyincognito8440 Quality is objective. Not saying you're wrong though.
@@gabrielidusogie9189 err, tell that to Jordan Peele
Tarantino could direct a damn good version of Constantine or Punisher.
Or deathstroke
Or Blade
Watching this absolute genius transform as he finds love and adjusts to fatherhood is a beautiful thing for an empath to witnesses. I thought i was impossible to admire him more. I was wrong.
So Tarantino is almost 100% in favour of REAL physical effects, where practical, instead of a 2 hour green screen? YES.. this is very good to hear.
Whatever you was first in line for THE PHANTOM MENACE
What, that he's a luddite?
I could only hope that Tarantino puts Steve Buscemi in his final film.
I thought Django Unchained was a superhero movie. Especially when Django confronts the Brittle Brothers and he had that blue suit on. It reminded me of Superman..That was so great.
It was SO great. One of my favourite movies ever.
You thought wrong. Super Heroes didn't invent heroes of myth with seemingly extraordinary abilities. Super Heroes are a very specific thing. They are costumed vigilantes.
@@collinsmcrae Yes, we'll all bow to your categories even if it makes discussion of the general issue more difficult. /s
@@schen7913 It's not that difficult. Django is not a super hero movie whatsoever, and Tarantino wasn't at all inspired by super Heroes when he made it. Epic revenge stories predate super Heroes.
@@collinsmcrae Moses was a superhero..I didnt think wrong at all.
Love Quentins ability to empathize and talk about this in a beyond his own lifespan perspective and it's part why he's such a legendary story teller.
Tarantino is the best lol.
I think you can make a superhero movie cinema. It’s just that the big studios won’t take many risks. So for me it isn’t superhero movie vs. not superhero movie but big studio movie vs. creative/personal movie.
Cinema requires a certain presence...a sense of pure being. It also shouldn't be informational because then it just turns into visualized literature. Essentially, the opposite of that is baked into the superhero genre.
Nolan’s Batman trilogy is a superhero movie cinema same thing with The Joker
0:30 THANK YOU!!! That’s exactly what I think!!!
Best way to implement CGi is to have a solid blend of CG and practical.
And give VFX artists time to finish the CGI before releasing the movie
@@robertmarginean164 of course
To me, a superhero movie is the total opposite of a Terantino movie, I couldn't even imagine him doing one.
Good cinema is still alive - just look at The Banshees of Inisherin. Fantastic movie
The Dark Knight Trilogy to me is the exception to the “superhero movies are not cinema” rule. That world that Nolan built perfectly combined gritty realism with comic book theatricality. He found a balance. There’s nothing theme-parkish about his Gotham. His trilogy, The Dark Knight especially, are more crime movies than they are comic book movies. And other than Nolan’s trilogy, there have only been a few comic book movies to break that mold: Joker, Watchmen, and Matt Reeve’s Batman all handled delving into the psychological and ideological aspects of their characters well.
I don't think it's a hard line to call something cinematic or not, nor should it ever be a measure of quality.
I do think there's something to be said about which movies actually seem to be made by a director instead of a studio. Most of the MCU just feels incredibly homogenised and the film-making is just... capturing footage of what is happening, not so much actual shot choices.
Tarantino knows a lot more about movies than most people so I'd trust his opinion
Than.
Green screen movie where the actor has to figure out how to make money without having a mental breakdown in an all green room in a sexy superhero outfit
Sadly, greenscreen broke Sir Ian McKellen
it doesn't matter how you do it, it only matter what's in the final product. What matters also is that you do not realise it's a special effect because of how realistic it. Special effects are means to and end, they are not the show.
I would love to see Tarantino do a rated R original or obscure character superhero film. Kurt Russell as a grizzled former superhero etc
"No."
Movies made for the soul purpose of pushing a franchise and selling toys are not cinema.
A good superhero movie made from the heart will (probably) be universally loved by everyone.
I love most of the Marvel films, but I’m also aware that nothing beats practical effects. 😂👏🏼
The combination of both with get better results than either/or
Except extremely good cgi which marvel doesnt have either, atleast not recently
@@ididntmeantoshootthatvietn5012 GOTG3 has some of the best CGI ever.
That was the most diplomatic way to say “I think superhero movies are for children”
It was in the works for a Tarantino Star Trek movie, I’m a huge Tarantino and Star Trek fan, but it fell through for some reason, I’m so disappointed, I KNOW it would be such an epic movie.
It felt weird that at least we could understand what the interviewed wanted to say, this show is about to ask 3000 questions without complete any, I enjoyed it!
I would love to see his take on Star Wars. There is so much lore he could do basically whatever he wanted
well, he is considering to make a Star Trek movie. Not the same, but kind of. I wish he does that. Would be weird but probably awesome.
Not working with Disney he couldn't do whatever he wanted
The Hateful Eight Was 1 of My Favorite Movies of His
Quentin has such a wise and nuanced take on this.
You can have any kind of movie, that’s the beauty of cinema.
This is the reason why Christopher Nolan's Batman Trilogy are great
I remember the bit he did about the Fantastic Four in Reservoir Dogs, I would love to see him do his own thing with them.
In Reservoir Dogs Mr Orange compares Joe Cabot to The Thing and has a Silver Surfer poster in his bedroom
He already does his own thing. Why would he want to play with someone elses toys?
He's too scientifically illiterate.
Imagine Quentin directing a deadpool movie ... would love to see that
what a good and sound take on the topic.
A Tarantino Deadpool movie would be awesome lol
Nowadays the biggest movies do most of the job post shooting the movie. The rewrite and reshoot. It is so messy, and you can tell.
Tarantino once said ‘Unbreakable’ was his favorite super hero movie. I totally agree with him. The Watchmen (2019) series was also AMAZING.
I agree with you except the Watchmen part personally I think it was a convoluted mess .
What I love about Tarantino is the fact that he is truly passionate about films and making them. At this point I don’t get the impression that he is motivated by money.
Joker is a DC movie that was very powerful in its own way. But yes 20 marvel movies in 2 years is a lot it’s hard to watch everything
Such an amazing film.
And that is very much inspired by Scorsese's King of Comedy
@@ponche5609 And Taxi Driver
@@ponche5609 I have not seen the king of comedy to compare but most of the story in joker was from a handful of comic books.
@@yaydog2702 watch king of comedy and then come back. The strength of that movie comes from adapting Scorsese coated in a joker shell
Tarantino is cinema.
I said what I said.
Wow. Such a bold take. Mine is pulp fiction is a good movie
Always remembered the silver surfer poster prominently on display in reservoir dogs.
They’re cartoons with actors in them which is fine by me.
Most cartoons have actors in them. The only exception is written/drawn only cartoons.
@@MrBrock314 Unless you count motion capture by the actor.
I think both are great and that's the great thing about being a consumer and fan
Well, Tarantino is still very respectful about it here.
I would love to see a Tarantino Punisher movie.
I think he should direct and act in a superhero movie
Tarantino should still do a Star Trek movie, with a brand new story, and new characters, along with new ideas that haven't been done before.
Both types of movies are good. I do enjoy good stories and whoever can translate that to a good watch I will watch it. Tarantino's movies are awesome and have great stories, action, what more would you want?
@Erika Burns There's being different, and then there's just poor nonsensical writing.
K& B! Thee best practical effects team ever. Rob Boetien & Rick Baker Tom Savini.. Special effect GODS.
His first answer made me laugh so hard
Is the full interview available to access anywhere? I’m in the UK. Thanks
Practical capture it on stage 100% thumbs up
Everyday I agree with Scorsese more and more
awesome take by quentin
He already made a superhero movie, its called Django unchained.
The real issue is that terantino creates a story while marvel and dc movies are more about the effects and less about the deep meaning and quality of the narrative , of the storytelling
Agree.
This is a generalisation. Especially regarding DC. What effects did Joker or The Batman have? Both were shot using actual sets or on location, both focused on story.
Cinema isn't primarily about storytelling though. That's just illustrated literature. Cinema is about conveying undefinable feelings, which superhero films don't do.
@@Gino565 Those 2 movies are not a part of DCEU.
I'd say DC are far less guilty of this. The batman and Joker barely use CGI and have deeper meanings with a large focus on the story at hand
My favorite movie maker talking about my other favorite movie maker. 10/10
I have no interest in the super hero movies.
Well we’re all thankful to learn where Tarantino and YOU stand
I hope younger generations will appreciate other genres of cinema
the only superhero movies that were interesting to me were the first couple spiderman movies from the 2000s
I would add the 1998 Blade movie to that list.
i loved deadpool as well.
‘The Batman’ from March was almost a masterpiece imo. Love those Tobey Spider-mans tho
Superman from the 70s is the only one I can stand. And it's not very good.
Hillarious thing about that stament were that people “agreed” with Scorsese mostly because they wanted to sound sophisticated and smart while they probably wouldn’t enjoy single movie from 40s or 50s that Martin praises often. Quentin gave Reasonable argument, it’s a generational thing similar to westerns at the time. Personally, MCU movies have been mostly great especially in Infinity Saga and some are geniuenly cinematic and artistic achivement whether people want to admit it or not🤷🏻♂️
Im sure other people have said it, but I also dont think he would jive with the amount of control, oversight, rewriting, editing (the kind of editing where you totally change the movie) and pandoring that most disney/marvel or dc movies do nowadays. Even if he agreed to direct it, it would likely be chopped up and frankensteined into something barely recognizable as Tarantino.
Let Tarintino do a practical effect superhero movie PLEASE. Would've loved to have him for Blade. Cant do Ghost Rider without special effects but I would love to see that.
He’s the best at making movies. Hands down
Not the best. Great....but not the best.
Capture it on film! Great mantra. Oldschool is best I believe too. Its way more interesting and sparks a lot more ingenuity. Whatever it takes! Apone! Absolute BadAsses! Pack em in. Get in there!
It's not really Hollywood's fault, it's the public. In previous generations adults generally did not watch superhero movies. If they did, is was when they took their kids. Now the #1 movie genre for adults is superheros. A genre that was intended for children and adolescents. Adults are more infantilized than ever before
Okay, that’s a little harsh and pretentious.
Practical effects are the best!
They are cinema but they are not CINEMA
“I met this kid at party, he was 16,17 (realises what he’s saying) maybe older 😂”
If Tarantino were to make a superhero movie it would be The Boys!
Now i can agree with Scorsese,especially with Marvel movie phase 4