The judge was just done with their meal, gets into to the car they are all happy, then looks at the phone and goes "ah f*** now I got to deal with this s***"
While both players just have their arms crossed, passive-aggressively insulting each other and making other uncalled-for remarks for the entire four-hour wait.
@@Shiny_Plume imagine this was a while ago and the judge came in and saw Pole Position shenanigans or a Mystic Mine mirror match. I think he's looking for a new career at that point.
Although this is the longest duel, let’s not pretend like the average DB Judge wait time isn’t like 2.5 hours. Should be a button to force a game cancel after 2h of no judge. But then people would AFK abuse it to boost their unofficial simulator W/L on a random bootleg site.
For real? I used to play on db for years up till md came out and I've never waited for a judge call for more than like 30 minutes and on average I'd say I wouldn't have to wait for more than 15/20 minutes. Has it gotten this bad in the last few months or have I been really lucky the whole time?
jonjones is just a troll lol, hes done this before, took insanely long to make basic plays and kept getting offended and called a judge when his opponent called him a kid
Yeah because it’s real people not an AI playing for you like on other Yugioh sims, communication and higher understanding of the game is crucial. Btw DB judges are no better, some get really petty when they lose arguments against a player that presents nothing but facts like sources and screenshots.
@@emmahas2moms8038 I doubt this is true. If you have any replays or whatnot of this happening, can you send them my way? Also keep in mind you're fully in your right to report these kinds of things on the forums, If you think a judge is behaving unprofessionally.
@@itsmetristan3671 I have reported these abuse in power on the DB forums, and guess what happened to both the report itself and the forum page/topic that I created? The report itself was dismissed completely while the page/topic was closed and eventually removed. Now if you try to search for it with my usernames, there aren’t any found despite the page/topic being 3-6 pages in length with at least 8 players commenting back n forth.
@@emmahas2moms8038 If your report was dismissed/denied, that means that the judge was actually in the right (assuming you didn't have a lack of evidence or something).
Ah yes, Jonjones. I remember dueling them once upon a time. They tried to tell me I missed a response window because they tried to keep playing past me saying "On Summon" and flipping torrential
I've had that happen to me before too. I activated Bottomless Trap Hole on someone's Cyber Dragon Nova and they tried to negate it with the Infinity they summoned on top of it.
Let's cover the rules: Nibiru being in hand is private knowledge. By rules, you may NOT reveal that you have Nibiru in your hand. You may also not tell your opponent that you don't have Nibiru in your hand, as that is revealing private knowledge. Technically speaking, a fringe statement could be, "I might have Nibiru," since that might be revealing private knowledge since it implies Nibiru is in your deck, but it also may not be revealing it since it isn't directly stating such to be the case. The number of summons that a player has conducted in a single turn is public knowledge. You ARE allowed to ask a player how many times they have summoned. Regardless of whether or not you have a Nibiru in your hand, or even in your deck, asking this question is perfectly legal. This would fall under the "Which cards were played during the current turn" section of public knowledge, but if you are keeping a tally then it could also be "Any notes taken by either Duelist during a Duel." You could technically rule shark and say that asking number of summons is revealing Nibiru but it's technically not, since the number of summons is public knowledge and you are free to reference it whenever you want. The same way that asking how many cards are in your opponent's hand is fine, but saying, "I have Heavy Slump, do you have 8 cards in hand?" isn't. Or how asking to see your opponent's GY doesn't necessarily suggest you have any cards that can interact with it. Now, Nibiru is the most relevant card that counts summons so you might consider it to be revealing private knowledge to ask how many summons they're at, but it isn't actually revealing it. By the rules, you can bluff Nibiru but ONLY through implications. For an example that probably WILL be relevant in the future, it's similar to if you look at your opponent's board during your turn and ask them which monsters have activated their effects, this is already relevant to keep track of for cards with OPT clauses but it also will be something that will also be relevant for Kurikara Tendou. However, it's illegal to say, "I have Kurikara Tendou" since that is private knowledge.
Reading this as a newly returning Yu-Gi-Oh player, I get the feeling that people who are good at Yu-Gi-Oh probably have pretty decent potential to be successful lawyers.
i always view mind game is part of the game... it's not my fault if you fall for my bluff of implying that i may have certain card in my hand, it's basically no different than set a useless spell and pretend it as a meaningful trap card. that guy will probably not happy if we play a game cause i always bluff.
For the GY thing, once my opponent told me to play the D.D Crow I had since I checked their grave. I actually didn’t have anything, I was just checking which card had what affect and what to try and negate with Ash. But he sat there and called a judge cuz I “told me he had D.D Crow” and it lead to us nulling the match after I revealed I had no crow in hand.
OK so rhat is amazing. Waiting 5 hours, 2 judge calls to make Jon eat some humble pie and then rubbing his face in it is the most highly skilled yugioh I've ever seen.
Even from the start this was ridiculous, how does it take 4 minutes to search and summon mo ye? I don't know what this archetype is but I'm pretty sure I could read every card in the archetype and learn some of the combos in less time than this guy takes to search and summon a card.
i thought it was kind of annoying, in master duel, when your opponent knows you have a hand trap...but that's a lot better than whatever the fuck this was. i'd be done after a 5 minute+ afk.
@@Dylligraphy yep You can also do it on db when somebody says think and then allow you You can think of a few Hts he might have So you make your opponent think fast Because the hand trap stuff And on edopro or MD you can just...turn off chaining until they go into a card you want to hit
@@kucukyilmert yeah, after 5 summons turn on always chain and your opponent rethinks the whole thing Or they are bad and continue without a care in the world
Do judges get paid or something? Cause otherwise why on earth would you spend so much time trying to solve discussions between 2 obnoxious individuals about a card game FOR FREE?
This is my first learning about the bluffing rule. Back when Magic Cylinder wasn't an uncompetitive card, I said "I set Magic Cylinder", and then my low LP opponent avoided my Magic Cylinder for several turns :( :(
@@yaboyvsauce6769 What he meant to say doesn't matter, what matters is that in the moment he "confirmed" to his opponent that he had nib, which basically ended reds turn.
@@yaboyvsauce6769 Blue definitely misstepped. I'd prob give him a Game Loss if I were judging and walked in right at that moment. He definitely illegally bluffed to gain an advantage.
Imagine being so attached to your ladder points and valuing your time so little that doing this is a better option than just calling it quits and forfeiting the match
One time I was up against a Six Sam player doing the infinite counter loop. I said “infinite counters is fine, you can proceed to the end steps or whatever.” The thing is, he had no other plan. He was telling me to scoop because he would just keep putting counters infinitely. I explained this only works in tournament settings where your win condition is time, otherwise you need to burn me or make a board because I can sit here just as long as you can. So I did just that. I made him do it for an hour and a half until he finally quit. Felt good to win a battle of willpower lmfao
Still think the judge was 100% wrong in this, though. If you said IRL "thinking" followed by "Oh wait, that's the 4th summon" to then say "ah no I can't activate my nibiru, can't show you but yeah." You're 100% getting kicked out of the event for lying. There is no world this is permitted. It's baffling a DB judge let it through.
Thing is, jonjones8 quite does the rule sharking a lot. The other day he got frozen during Coder's stream for the same reason. God knows how long till he learns to behave better...
*Konami covers Bluffing pretty clearly in the Infraction & Penalty Policy:* "Misrepresenting the Game State is considered Unsporting Conduct - Cheating" EXAMPLE 6 | "A Duelist has Exodia the Forbidden One, Left Leg of the Forbidden One, Left Arm of the Forbidden One, Right Leg of the Forbidden One, and Right Arm of the Forbidden One in his hand, and lies to his opponent about holding a Win Condition, prolonging the Match." This example highlights how a ridiculous gamestate can be created when one player misrepresents the gamestate at any point. Bluffing is a skilll and lying is not bluffing it is cheating. Considering that Rhat said "I can't show you it but yea" it falls under the same scenario as above. You cannot lie to your opponent about your hand contents. This would be an irrepairable gamestate as you can't rewind to the start of the match and this is a deliberate lie, so a warning must be issued at least. Rhat would recieve a Game Loss for this in Tournie as there would be no way to fix the gamestate or prove that JonJones8 wasn't affected by the fake hand information as he clearly states he was and Nibiru is absolutely relevant if declared to your opponent to be in hand even when it isn't. Pretty common scenario but surprised to see that DB doesn't consider this a broken gamestate, there's plenty of content in the policy that specifically states scenarios like these are not fixable and if intentionally caused by one player should be taken seriously.
Question: Didnt Jon *assume* he had nibiru ? since the opponent just asked how many monsters did he summon ? which is not a lie, he did not SAY I have nib, but only he the summon. and concerning the "I cant show *it* to you" came after he assumed it and he could easily tell him "the "it" doesnt goes after nibiru exactly BUT on the card I have intenion to use" this is my point of view.
@@otangakudyokeman7124 No jonjones was right in the Nibiru situation. That type of bluffing is 100% not allowed. You can't even imply you have any type of cards in hand. You're not supposed to talk about private knowledge locations.
@@otangakudyokeman7124 Rhat said "I cant show it to you but yea" in response to jon saying "how do i know you have nib" he literally said yea, this is lying.
@@otangakudyokeman7124 No. The opponent specifically stated that they had just attempted to illegally activate Nibiru, which means that they had Nibiru in hand. As they didn’t have Nibiru, this is lying. EDIT: Capitalization.
Dueling Nexus, YGOEdoPro Project Ignis, Master Duel: * *exists* * People: *"imma play on this crappy simulator that requires judges and shit instead of being automated"*
@@alfian4653 I changed opinion, it's way more useful as a "open" simulator that let's you do any move and tests. If they added a "automatic rules" setting and improved graphics setting it would probably be the most used simulator
So you can use mind crush declare and you don't have to reveal anything and yet there's a policy that prevents people from making bluffs. Someone please help me understand what's going on here
I remember having a long game that lasted about 5 hours or more Was on dueling nexus a few years ago, and it wasn’t like this but an actual battle that lasted super long, I was playing hieratic vs a stall destiny board, and we kept recovery stuff and interrupting that we just lasted forever before I died to slow lp chipping. It was like turn 56 or a bit longer, I would have preferred something like this video as it’s kinda funnier.
The only game I played that lasted this long was war... we each ended up controlling a 3rd of the world and the 4th guy died at some point... there was no end in sight, so we just called for world piece and ended the game.
@@alicepbg2042 literally 1984. Note: if you don’t get the joke it’s because in the book 1984 three gigantic countries duked it in war for decades at that point
So yeah, more reason to stick to Master Duel, no matter how scuffed the meta and banlist is. Human interaction is the shittiest possible thing in any TCG.
I've still got a replay of Cristian Urena going off on Dueling Book judges when they tried to penalize him for an unintentional illegal play his opponent caught a few turns later. A 3 hour wait time for a judge, toxic players, massive lag spikes, missing main menu and profile features, this manual simulator has become straight garbage.
DB’s judge design and setup is so un-sustainable and pathetic for receiving like $20,000+ in donations a year. You’d think servers and judges would just be better in general.
Judges on DB are voluntary if I'm not mistaken, and the money really isn't there to hire the sheer number of judges it'd take to properly judge the site. It's not realistic.
@@Scapegoat-po2ou DuelingBook does simulate tcg and ocg formats. Master Duel is what Konami is doing to unite both formats into one. What I was referring to in my comment was the fact that on DB you have to wait so long for a judge. Which, 9 times out of 10, is over some petty b.s. Different strokes for different folks mate.
Konami’s pretty clear on bluffing; misrepresenting/Lying about the game state in any way is considered cheating and unsporting. They give an extreme example but it shows how it can lead to dumb situations. They give the example of someone having all 5 exodia pieces but saying they don’t to artificially extend the match. Likewise, implying something to your opponent which influences their decisions is considered unsportsmanlike and is punishable. It’s one of the few things Konami is crystal clear about; No bluffing, No lying, No misrepresenting.
@@jk844100 Coming from MtG, it's really weird because MtG tournament policy allows you to bluff as long as it's private information. You're only not allowed to misrepresent public information.
He's been using two different alt accounts and judges haven't done anything to those. Than it took jonjones over a year maybe even two years to get banned.
Judge here: While bluffing like that is not technically against the rules, it walks a very fine line. If you have no possible interaction and take the time to say “thinking” or bluff something that you do not have, it can be ruled as stalling. (This is assuming there is a time limit.) As Farfa and the other judge said, saying you have a card that you actually do not have, or attempting to implicate so very obviously, is not legal.
Except that revealing any sort of private information is in fact against the rules it's literally on konami's website. Therefore the only reasonable stoppage would be to read a card or if you have a response. If you don't have a response or a card that can be activated you're literally stalling.
Imagine dueling in real life and when you call a judge, both you & opponent wait for 4 hours because judge comes driving from next city lmao
The judge was just done with their meal, gets into to the car they are all happy, then looks at the phone and goes "ah f*** now I got to deal with this s***"
While both players just have their arms crossed, passive-aggressively insulting each other and making other uncalled-for remarks for the entire four-hour wait.
Are you from Texas?
And the judge finally comes in, looks at the board state, and says “yeah this is all fine. Keep playing” and leaves.
@@Shiny_Plume imagine this was a while ago and the judge came in and saw Pole Position shenanigans or a Mystic Mine mirror match. I think he's looking for a new career at that point.
"Only one more duel before bed"
"why do I hear birds 🙂"
@@thalente8074 :')
OMG could you imagine x'D
"you will never get close to my skill"
*plays the easiest synchro deck ever made*
and takes 4 minutes per action
Not even the tengyi version just pure swordsoul and tell people he's skill
@@nguyentandung42 …He had a Tenyi in G1?
not rly, swordsoul takes a lot of skill to play at a high level, but to be fair, im not sure this guy was exactly high level
And cheated, cuz you can only use 1 eff on Chixia perturn, he used both
Although this is the longest duel, let’s not pretend like the average DB Judge wait time isn’t like 2.5 hours. Should be a button to force a game cancel after 2h of no judge. But then people would AFK abuse it to boost their unofficial simulator W/L on a random bootleg site.
For real? I used to play on db for years up till md came out and I've never waited for a judge call for more than like 30 minutes and on average I'd say I wouldn't have to wait for more than 15/20 minutes. Has it gotten this bad in the last few months or have I been really lucky the whole time?
@@vhagar2903 You must play when the judges are actually online
@@vhagar2903 Depending on the time of day, yea it gets this bad
If you're waiting 2.5 hours for DB elo, it's not a judges problem- it's a you problem LOL
@@vhagar2903 depends on timezone you live and when you play
jonjones is just a troll lol, hes done this before, took insanely long to make basic plays and kept getting offended and called a judge when his opponent called him a kid
Didn't DB Grinder even show a match with him as well? DB said he would pull a "jonjones" lol
@@elementalherosparkman168 yep I knew what was going down when I saw his name
"I'll never forget this duel ever"
That's just a free identification that he is a kid lol.
Yeah he is always taking forever to do anything, even the most basic things
How so many people know him ?
Dueling book judges are subjected to psychological torture on a regular basis because these players are just really weird
Yeah because it’s real people not an AI playing for you like on other Yugioh sims, communication and higher understanding of the game is crucial. Btw DB judges are no better, some get really petty when they lose arguments against a player that presents nothing but facts like sources and screenshots.
@@emmahas2moms8038 I doubt this is true. If you have any replays or whatnot of this happening, can you send them my way? Also keep in mind you're fully in your right to report these kinds of things on the forums, If you think a judge is behaving unprofessionally.
@@itsmetristan3671 I have several recorded on my profile, Crimson7Reaper & Crimson0Reaper.
@@itsmetristan3671 I have reported these abuse in power on the DB forums, and guess what happened to both the report itself and the forum page/topic that I created? The report itself was dismissed completely while the page/topic was closed and eventually removed. Now if you try to search for it with my usernames, there aren’t any found despite the page/topic being 3-6 pages in length with at least 8 players commenting back n forth.
@@emmahas2moms8038 If your report was dismissed/denied, that means that the judge was actually in the right (assuming you didn't have a lack of evidence or something).
jonjon: do I know anything you have?
Rhat *with an empty hand*: nib maybe
jonjon to Rhat who *still* has an empty hand: liar
Gold
Ah yes, Jonjones. I remember dueling them once upon a time. They tried to tell me I missed a response window because they tried to keep playing past me saying "On Summon" and flipping torrential
I've had that happen to me before too. I activated Bottomless Trap Hole on someone's Cyber Dragon Nova and they tried to negate it with the Infinity they summoned on top of it.
@@jacobmonks3722 lmao
Let's cover the rules:
Nibiru being in hand is private knowledge. By rules, you may NOT reveal that you have Nibiru in your hand. You may also not tell your opponent that you don't have Nibiru in your hand, as that is revealing private knowledge. Technically speaking, a fringe statement could be, "I might have Nibiru," since that might be revealing private knowledge since it implies Nibiru is in your deck, but it also may not be revealing it since it isn't directly stating such to be the case.
The number of summons that a player has conducted in a single turn is public knowledge. You ARE allowed to ask a player how many times they have summoned. Regardless of whether or not you have a Nibiru in your hand, or even in your deck, asking this question is perfectly legal. This would fall under the "Which cards were played during the current turn" section of public knowledge, but if you are keeping a tally then it could also be "Any notes taken by either Duelist during a Duel."
You could technically rule shark and say that asking number of summons is revealing Nibiru but it's technically not, since the number of summons is public knowledge and you are free to reference it whenever you want. The same way that asking how many cards are in your opponent's hand is fine, but saying, "I have Heavy Slump, do you have 8 cards in hand?" isn't. Or how asking to see your opponent's GY doesn't necessarily suggest you have any cards that can interact with it. Now, Nibiru is the most relevant card that counts summons so you might consider it to be revealing private knowledge to ask how many summons they're at, but it isn't actually revealing it. By the rules, you can bluff Nibiru but ONLY through implications.
For an example that probably WILL be relevant in the future, it's similar to if you look at your opponent's board during your turn and ask them which monsters have activated their effects, this is already relevant to keep track of for cards with OPT clauses but it also will be something that will also be relevant for Kurikara Tendou. However, it's illegal to say, "I have Kurikara Tendou" since that is private knowledge.
Reading this as a newly returning Yu-Gi-Oh player, I get the feeling that people who are good at Yu-Gi-Oh probably have pretty decent potential to be successful lawyers.
i always view mind game is part of the game... it's not my fault if you fall for my bluff of implying that i may have certain card in my hand, it's basically no different than set a useless spell and pretend it as a meaningful trap card.
that guy will probably not happy if we play a game cause i always bluff.
wait, thats retarded xD so basically i cant ever talk about private info? Its a rules violation to say "i have 18 blue-eyes in my hand" ? xD
For the GY thing, once my opponent told me to play the D.D Crow I had since I checked their grave. I actually didn’t have anything, I was just checking which card had what affect and what to try and negate with Ash. But he sat there and called a judge cuz I “told me he had D.D Crow” and it lead to us nulling the match after I revealed I had no crow in hand.
@@johnwalker1058 I mean because those guys actually read the fine print.
"Counting summons is fine"
"That's cheating"
"do I know what you have"
"Nib maybe" (0 cards in hand)
"I think you are lying"
Of course they would wait 3+ hours - it's not about playing Yugioh, it's about proving someone's wrong on the internet.
Also ygo players have no life outside of the game most of the times so they're not losing much
@@entiendemierda3849 Could use that time to play ygo
When the duel last longer than you:
I mean even a robot won't last 5 hours man it will run out of battery
I mean... if you last longer than this duel... call me.
@@blazeraz7666 u mean to tell me my hatsune miku robo waifu can't last for more than 5 hours in my room? 😭😢😰
@@alicepbg2042 yo I can do an hour both on duels and other things (includes taking a shit and washing the dishes tbh) what's your number?
@@suisui5930 Sanest Sky Striker player.
Just for the record, my longest duel ever was 2.5 hours long - 2 hours and 10 minutes consisting of just waiting for a judge to arrive.
OK so rhat is amazing. Waiting 5 hours, 2 judge calls to make Jon eat some humble pie and then rubbing his face in it is the most highly skilled yugioh I've ever seen.
At this point jonjones needs to be banned from Dueling Book. He's been a constant problem.
How the hell is he not yet lmao
HE CAN'T KEEP GETTING AWAY WITH THIS
@@Dylligraphy its not a coincidence his nickname is jonjones "8", he's been banned multiple times, and its well known for this
You know you're an asshole when you've named yourself after one of the biggest drugged up assholes in mma
@@gabrielmonteiro8856 getting banned 7x and still wanting to play lmao. Mans is ill for sure
Why do you even play on that platform? Dueling Nexus and Master Duel do all the ruling for you
this guy is pretty famous fot this kind of shit.
Thanks for existing jonjone
You make my day everytime
Even from the start this was ridiculous, how does it take 4 minutes to search and summon mo ye? I don't know what this archetype is but I'm pretty sure I could read every card in the archetype and learn some of the combos in less time than this guy takes to search and summon a card.
swordsoul is definitely a deck you can learn in an instant after reading. Deck plays itself,your lines are extremely basic
It's basically a feeder deck that can't grind and is a bye
You’ve never seen swordsoul?
Its one of the stupidest decks currently in the format, not surprised one can figure it out quicker than it takes for this dude to normal summon.
Pure swordsoul required absolutely no brain power whatsoever so this guy is probably just intentionally staling and being a dick
This is almost the duration of your average MtG duel
i thought it was kind of annoying, in master duel, when your opponent knows you have a hand trap...but that's a lot better than whatever the fuck this was. i'd be done after a 5 minute+ afk.
idk reading delays adds another skill to the game imo
@@Dylligraphy yep
You can also do it on db when somebody says think and then allow you
You can think of a few Hts he might have
So you make your opponent think fast Because the hand trap stuff
And on edopro or MD you can just...turn off chaining until they go into a card you want to hit
@@idkjustputagoodname6120 and in edopro if yo use always chain you can also bait your opponent
@@kucukyilmert yeah, after 5 summons turn on always chain and your opponent rethinks the whole thing
Or they are bad and continue without a care in the world
@@idkjustputagoodname6120 i always give ash bait then turn off chain until summon 5
"nib maybe"
God I fucking love this dude
Do judges get paid or something? Cause otherwise why on earth would you spend so much time trying to solve discussions between 2 obnoxious individuals about a card game FOR FREE?
Exposure :)
@@Farfa seems like a lot of stress for what it's worth tbh
@@MartinStribing dont they get alot of monèy cus of donations?
@@Sasukeuchiha-wm9np fuck no
@@Sasukeuchiha-wm9np hmm not sure, I don't use DB. Someone in the comments said they get like 20,000 a year?
You could use your time wisely, or you could play dueling book.
Nah I'm just watch the 10 hour nyan cat video
This is my first learning about the bluffing rule. Back when Magic Cylinder wasn't an uncompetitive card, I said "I set Magic Cylinder", and then my low LP opponent avoided my Magic Cylinder for several turns :( :(
Blue saying "I cant show it to you but yea" is literally lying and saying yes i do in response to red saying "How do i know you have nib."
He clarified that he was meaning to say yea, you don’t know if I have nib.
@@yaboyvsauce6769 What he meant to say doesn't matter, what matters is that in the moment he "confirmed" to his opponent that he had nib, which basically ended reds turn.
@@yaboyvsauce6769 If he clarified in the moment it'd be understandable but he only clarified when a judge was called.
@@yaboyvsauce6769 Blue definitely misstepped. I'd prob give him a Game Loss if I were judging and walked in right at that moment. He definitely illegally bluffed to gain an advantage.
Nice of Duel Log to make an appearance in this video
I don't know who's dumber, The Ruleshark guy or the one who actually waited just to see him lose the argument
My man Jon is really out here roleplaying Seto Kaiba on DB.
I couldn’t force myself to wait more than an hour for a judge. After an hour the opponent can just have it.
Imagine being so attached to your ladder points and valuing your time so little that doing this is a better option than just calling it quits and forfeiting the match
the best comment was phantom knights of fragile baby I laughed so hard when I saw that
In all honesty my internet connection would have died of while waiting there
yugioh community in a nuthshell roflmao. What a jewel of a match with trucks of salt, tears, clumsyness and judges.
Bro was really just playing DMV simulator waiting for the judge call
One time I was up against a Six Sam player doing the infinite counter loop. I said “infinite counters is fine, you can proceed to the end steps or whatever.”
The thing is, he had no other plan. He was telling me to scoop because he would just keep putting counters infinitely. I explained this only works in tournament settings where your win condition is time, otherwise you need to burn me or make a board because I can sit here just as long as you can.
So I did just that. I made him do it for an hour and a half until he finally quit. Felt good to win a battle of willpower lmfao
lol
Based
That doesn't even work in tournament because IRL, you need to declare how many times you do the loop, you cant just do the loop forever.
jonjones always with the “I have to pee”
Some say jonjones is still crying about it.
didn't farfa also wait ages against the opponent "are you Italian? now is all clare"
I think the longest game I had was like a 45 minute, 16 turn long duel against Drytron with my Monarchs in Master Duel and I felt so drained.
i think jonjones8 is known on db to be an INSANE child, rages all the time for nothing and it's kinda funny
Looked over to the right and it all made sense.
Man acts like the real Jon Jones LOL
Still think the judge was 100% wrong in this, though.
If you said IRL "thinking" followed by "Oh wait, that's the 4th summon" to then say "ah no I can't activate my nibiru, can't show you but yeah." You're 100% getting kicked out of the event for lying. There is no world this is permitted. It's baffling a DB judge let it through.
nah fr that judge wait is actually insane, 3 hours???
we need bot judges
Thing is, jonjones8 quite does the rule sharking a lot. The other day he got frozen during Coder's stream for the same reason. God knows how long till he learns to behave better...
this is why dueling book will never die out, master duel has nothing on this
Meanwhile in master duel, the only judge is Maxx C
*Konami covers Bluffing pretty clearly in the Infraction & Penalty Policy:*
"Misrepresenting the Game State is considered Unsporting Conduct - Cheating"
EXAMPLE 6 | "A Duelist has Exodia the Forbidden One, Left Leg of the Forbidden One, Left Arm of the Forbidden One, Right Leg of the Forbidden One, and Right Arm of the Forbidden One in his hand, and lies to his opponent about holding a Win Condition, prolonging the Match."
This example highlights how a ridiculous gamestate can be created when one player misrepresents the gamestate at any point. Bluffing is a skilll and lying is not bluffing it is cheating. Considering that Rhat said "I can't show you it but yea" it falls under the same scenario as above. You cannot lie to your opponent about your hand contents. This would be an irrepairable gamestate as you can't rewind to the start of the match and this is a deliberate lie, so a warning must be issued at least. Rhat would recieve a Game Loss for this in Tournie as there would be no way to fix the gamestate or prove that JonJones8 wasn't affected by the fake hand information as he clearly states he was and Nibiru is absolutely relevant if declared to your opponent to be in hand even when it isn't. Pretty common scenario but surprised to see that DB doesn't consider this a broken gamestate, there's plenty of content in the policy that specifically states scenarios like these are not fixable and if intentionally caused by one player should be taken seriously.
Question: Didnt Jon *assume* he had nibiru ? since the opponent just asked how many monsters did he summon ? which is not a lie, he did not SAY I have nib, but only he the summon. and concerning the "I cant show *it* to you" came after he assumed it and he could easily tell him "the "it" doesnt goes after nibiru exactly BUT on the card I have intenion to use"
this is my point of view.
Nice try jonjones8
@@otangakudyokeman7124 No jonjones was right in the Nibiru situation. That type of bluffing is 100% not allowed. You can't even imply you have any type of cards in hand. You're not supposed to talk about private knowledge locations.
@@otangakudyokeman7124 Rhat said "I cant show it to you but yea" in response to jon saying "how do i know you have nib" he literally said yea, this is lying.
@@otangakudyokeman7124 No. The opponent specifically stated that they had just attempted to illegally activate Nibiru, which means that they had Nibiru in hand. As they didn’t have Nibiru, this is lying.
EDIT: Capitalization.
And this is why I don't go in dueling book
Great video, and the thumbnail is brilliant.
Good ol rhat boonington, shenanigans at real events, shenanigans on dueling book. Smh
They took an entire day of locals worth of time to play a single game. Think about that.
long story short my guy fell for a nibiru bluff lol
Jon Jones sure is living up to his name lmao
man TCG sims are sweaty af huh
Duelingbook chat is entertaining af
This is legit one of coders Calls
8:26 lmaoooo you know jones was boiling when reading this
well it's an illegal activation of nibiru since he didn't have it in hand
Bluffing being an illegal move if one of then dumbest rules in all of Yu-Gi-Oh... And there are actual a lot of those.
Dueling Nexus, YGOEdoPro Project Ignis, Master Duel: * *exists* *
People: *"imma play on this crappy simulator that requires judges and shit instead of being automated"*
I mean it's still the best way to test for real life events.
I still wish we had ladder on EDO though.
@@alfian4653 I changed opinion, it's way more useful as a "open" simulator that let's you do any move and tests. If they added a "automatic rules" setting and improved graphics setting it would probably be the most used simulator
So you can use mind crush declare and you don't have to reveal anything and yet there's a policy that prevents people from making bluffs. Someone please help me understand what's going on here
So called free thinkers when they
think
This dude really wanted to tell him he had no skill when he's literally playing another flavor of ns aleister
I remember having a long game that lasted about 5 hours or more
Was on dueling nexus a few years ago, and it wasn’t like this but an actual battle that lasted super long, I was playing hieratic vs a stall destiny board, and we kept recovery stuff and interrupting that we just lasted forever before I died to slow lp chipping. It was like turn 56 or a bit longer, I would have preferred something like this video as it’s kinda funnier.
The only game I played that lasted this long was war... we each ended up controlling a 3rd of the world and the 4th guy died at some point...
there was no end in sight, so we just called for world piece and ended the game.
@@alicepbg2042 literally 1984.
Note: if you don’t get the joke it’s because in the book 1984 three gigantic countries duked it in war for decades at that point
@@simonpetrikov3992 did they also go "you know what? fuck it" and did something else?
@@alicepbg2042 no legends say they kept fighting for eternity
And this is why I always stuck with EDO over Duelbook.
Honestly, I just want to buy Lund a drink after that, jesus christ.
No cards in hand..."Who knows I might have Nibiru" *Shrugs*
6:03 Anyone know where in the policy documents it says this?
Jonjon gonna have ptsd of the phrase "on ns"
Plot twist, they did all of this on ourpose for farfa content
no way I dueled this guy myself like 2 months ago
Good to see Jon Jones getting into yugioh and staying out of trouble. Hopefully he'll be ready for Stipe in September 😂
Certified Dueling Book moment
So yeah, more reason to stick to Master Duel, no matter how scuffed the meta and banlist is.
Human interaction is the shittiest possible thing in any TCG.
This match is the proof that creating a card game school in yugioh gx was not a crazy idea.
i mean to be fair genocide isn't specifically in the rules, so i think it's fair to think it'd be legal during a yugioh tournament
imagine jon with kaiba's voice and rhat with joey's voice
now jono account has been frozen by distant coder.
Jonjones8 the most civilized synchro player
Schrödinger's Nibiru
I've still got a replay of Cristian Urena going off on Dueling Book judges when they tried to penalize him for an unintentional illegal play his opponent caught a few turns later. A 3 hour wait time for a judge, toxic players, massive lag spikes, missing main menu and profile features, this manual simulator has become straight garbage.
I saw this on distant coder’s livestream this duel was very interesting
Yay! Dueling Book content! 😃
Inless there was money on the line I would have said f it and lift
No shock that its jonjones, every db grinder replay with him is insanely toxic.
DB’s judge design and setup is so un-sustainable and pathetic for receiving like $20,000+ in donations a year. You’d think servers and judges would just be better in general.
It is insane yugioh doesnt have a comprehensive simulator
idk man, if you subtract the cost of keeping the site up from that 20k, that's not a massively amount of man hours you can compensate people for.
Judges on DB are voluntary if I'm not mistaken, and the money really isn't there to hire the sheer number of judges it'd take to properly judge the site. It's not realistic.
Imagine thinking judges actually get paid lol
You clearly underestimate the cost of hosting a website.
not the longest, seen someone else wait for a judge for either 8 or 9 hours but it was entertaining regardless
seems like a Sky Striker Ace - Roze Normal match but done in a bad way
I'm so excited I saw this live
Farfa you should make a video asking chat for their most blatant rule shark stories they had
And this is why Master Duel is the better simulator.
If only it simulated a real format.
@@Scapegoat-po2ou DuelingBook does simulate tcg and ocg formats. Master Duel is what Konami is doing to unite both formats into one.
What I was referring to in my comment was the fact that on DB you have to wait so long for a judge. Which, 9 times out of 10, is over some petty b.s.
Different strokes for different folks mate.
This has better lore than Albaz or World Legacy.
I will never understand Yu-Gi-Oh bluffing policy and tournament policies in general
Konami’s pretty clear on bluffing; misrepresenting/Lying about the game state in any way is considered cheating and unsporting.
They give an extreme example but it shows how it can lead to dumb situations. They give the example of someone having all 5 exodia pieces but saying they don’t to artificially extend the match.
Likewise, implying something to your opponent which influences their decisions is considered unsportsmanlike and is punishable.
It’s one of the few things Konami is crystal clear about; No bluffing, No lying, No misrepresenting.
@@jk844100 Coming from MtG, it's really weird because MtG tournament policy allows you to bluff as long as it's private information. You're only not allowed to misrepresent public information.
@@tabbune Konami says private information must stay private. You can’t reveal private information (even if it turns out to not be true)
@@jk844100 Yes, and I'm saying that's strange because I come from MtG where you are allowed to lie about private information
@@tabbune I know I was just saying
It’s time to duel… forever r
Thankfully Jonjones is banned
He's been using two different alt accounts and judges haven't done anything to those. Than it took jonjones over a year maybe even two years to get banned.
Oh, it was the players that were toxic not simply the strategies. Oof
Judge here: While bluffing like that is not technically against the rules, it walks a very fine line. If you have no possible interaction and take the time to say “thinking” or bluff something that you do not have, it can be ruled as stalling. (This is assuming there is a time limit.) As Farfa and the other judge said, saying you have a card that you actually do not have, or attempting to implicate so very obviously, is not legal.
He had a set Revolt he could use in response so I guess he was in its right to think on summon
From what I can tell blue did explicitly say they have Nib when they didn’t, which is illegal.
Except that revealing any sort of private information is in fact against the rules it's literally on konami's website. Therefore the only reasonable stoppage would be to read a card or if you have a response. If you don't have a response or a card that can be activated you're literally stalling.
In this situation, what they said directly meant that they had nib in hand. They didn't technically say "I have nib," but they might as well have.
Fun fact: It's been 5 hours😔
Pov: You playing against infernity