Michael E. Mann | Our Fragile Moment: How Lessons from Earth's Past Can Help Us Survive the...

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 2 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 77

  • @johnsmith5139
    @johnsmith5139 Рік тому +6

    Very interesting.

  • @yes12337
    @yes12337 11 місяців тому +3

    That was a good explanation of the problem and I'm happy it ended with discussion on grid-scale energy storage, because this is something that we should already have, which would produce enormous profit for the investors and yet for some unambiguous reason it doesn't seem to be a top priority for governments or even corporations.

  • @SteveDondley
    @SteveDondley 11 місяців тому +5

    Mann does a great job getting good facts out and helping the public get accurate scientific information. He’s a real mensch.

    • @krueltykampaign1580
      @krueltykampaign1580 9 місяців тому

      Eww. That’s disgusting. “A real mensch”? You actually talk like that? If I heard someone say something like that in real life I would be so embarrassed for them. Do you think that your life is a Hollywood movie? Are you Woody Allen having a heartfelt conversation with Jason Biggs on a bench somewhere in Central Park? Yuck.

    • @thebritishbookworm2649
      @thebritishbookworm2649 9 місяців тому +5

      No he doesn't.

    • @scottekoontz
      @scottekoontz 8 місяців тому +3

      @@thebritishbookworm2649 Wow, that Prager U certificate paid off.

    • @johnnyblaze373
      @johnnyblaze373 8 місяців тому

      definitely a bot or a complete imbecile

    • @truthordare5438
      @truthordare5438 8 місяців тому

      He's just a bookseller now, who took others' ideas "Keeling Curve" & called it the hockey stick by adding ancient data. Latched onto GT to inflate his media presence.
      Ruined other scientists' careers, even though what they said has come & is coming true.
      Promotes false technology that has no time left to work.

  • @JW4REnvironment
    @JW4REnvironment Рік тому +6

    We are lucky to have a great scientist telling us the truth about what greenhouse gases are doing! Dr. Mann is a national hero who completely nails the need to quickly cut greenhouse gas emissions. The faster we do it, the less it will cost!

    • @Vincent-ct7ik
      @Vincent-ct7ik 11 місяців тому

      Michael Mann is a scientific crook. He was condemn in court for his fake « hockey cross ».
      Check : Tom ball vs Michael Mann
      In any other scientific discipline he

    • @thebritishbookworm2649
      @thebritishbookworm2649 9 місяців тому +5

      No he isn't. He's a complete conman.

    • @Vincent-ct7ik
      @Vincent-ct7ik 9 місяців тому +1

      @@thebritishbookworm2649 a crook ! In no other science he would be allowed to represent his speciality.

    • @Vincent-ct7ik
      @Vincent-ct7ik 9 місяців тому

      @@thebritishbookworm2649 Michael Mann is a scientific crook. He was condemn in court for his fake « hockey cross ».
      Check : Tom ball vs Michael Mann
      In any other scientific discipline he would not be allowed to speak in public.

    • @johnnyblaze373
      @johnnyblaze373 8 місяців тому +1

      🤣

  • @Arafury57
    @Arafury57 11 місяців тому +16

    Mann from Penn U who should actually be in the State Penn for his Climate Gate lies.

    • @TennesseeJed
      @TennesseeJed 8 місяців тому

      So, you believe that the climate change discussion is all bunk, or just Mann's presentation of it?

  • @jools-jt9nd
    @jools-jt9nd 9 місяців тому +4

    Isn't he being challenged in court ??

    • @thebritishbookworm2649
      @thebritishbookworm2649 9 місяців тому +3

      Yes his work is totally fraudulent.

    • @scottekoontz
      @scottekoontz 8 місяців тому +2

      @@thebritishbookworm2649 Prager: That there man is a con... man. Oh how I hate the man that is conny. He doth con. Test on Friday.

    • @misc_channel
      @misc_channel 7 місяців тому

      100% a fraud in my opinion

    • @davidgurarie6712
      @davidgurarie6712 4 місяці тому

      Yes, the court of 'climate-denier' crackpots has already indicted him.

  • @bcask61
    @bcask61 8 місяців тому +4

    Did Dr. Fraudpants bring his Nobel Prize to the lecture? Oh right.

  • @donniemoder1466
    @donniemoder1466 Рік тому +8

    Mr. Mann may or may not be a great scientist, but he is a terrible spokesman. He is not a good communicator, he is just a boring space filler. He almost immediately disengages the audience from wanting to understand anything he says. Hence the non-viral nature of this video. What Sting song? Do we need to hear it to understand?

    • @alecaruso2508
      @alecaruso2508 11 місяців тому +3

      He is a scientist and not a politician fortunately

    • @truthordare5438
      @truthordare5438 8 місяців тому +1

      He's not very good, but has manipulated his way to the spotlight as he promotes solutions that cannot work.

    • @misc_channel
      @misc_channel 7 місяців тому

      @@alecaruso2508 "scientist"

  • @eduardofranz
    @eduardofranz 11 місяців тому +2

    Excellent presentation. To solve the problem Americans have to elect a Democrat Supermajority. It is not just voting. Who is going to be the next Acapulco, Houston? Are you ready?

    • @truthordare5438
      @truthordare5438 8 місяців тому

      It's way too late now. We've no time left for any behavior changes or technology to work in the time remaining, as all the above add tremendous amounts of FF to the unfolding disaster.

  • @kenmerry2729
    @kenmerry2729 8 місяців тому +2

    Well I don't think you would know considering the failure of your data!

  • @jackgoldman1
    @jackgoldman1 Рік тому +11

    This man is clueless.

    • @JW4REnvironment
      @JW4REnvironment Рік тому +5

      I beg to differ. He is an internationally recognized climate scientist and physicist who tells it like it is. His credentials with degrees from Cal and Yale are impeccable. So can you give me a single fact to back up your reckless ad hominem attack? I didn't think so...

    • @Vincent-ct7ik
      @Vincent-ct7ik 11 місяців тому

      @@JW4REnvironment
      Michael Mann is a scientific crook. He was condemn in court for his fake « hockey cross ».
      Check : Tom ball vs Michael Mann
      In any other scientific discipline he would not be allowed to speak in public.

    • @krueltykampaign1580
      @krueltykampaign1580 9 місяців тому +2

      ​@@JW4REnvironment Do you have a study to back that up? Or do you want us to take your non sequitur response as a coherent logical argument simply because you implied it is? You do understand that correlation is not causation right? Just because having credentials is correlated with not being clueless, that doesn’t mean that it causes someone to not be clueless. You have no idea what you’re talking about. You don’t even have one single fact on your side. My reasoning is impeccable. Your position is reckless.

    • @thebritishbookworm2649
      @thebritishbookworm2649 9 місяців тому

      ​@@JW4REnvironmentno he's a fraud which had been categorically proven by independent scientists who have checked his work..he's a disgusting person who isn't remotely concerned about the horrific consequences his lies are having on the poor.

    • @ce152capt100
      @ce152capt100 9 місяців тому

      The statistical methods he used to develop his “hockey stick” have been widely criticized as fraudulent. Cal and Yale are left wing seminaries. They are quickly losing their cachet along with entire Ivy League. He’s spread disgusting lies about colleagues who’ve disagreed with his contrived methods; Judith Curry among others. The guy is a disgusting blight on humanity. @@JW4REnvironment