Well done by beating everyone to the punch. 😊😉 You double the power density you half the cost! You double the charge speed you don't need such big batteries and remove customer concerns 👍
I like this tech....it is much more viable due to just being a simple to make and it plays nice with current technologies. Most technologies are just pie in the sky due to ability to scale and costs..solid state, etc. Lets keep our fingers crossed!
fixing the battery problems -- low range, slow charging, high cost, short lifetime -- will be a great step toward making ev's a reasonable alternative to icvs.
@@mike_w-tw6jd Poor battery performance is the primary complaint among people who trade in their ev and return to ice. Ice vehicles "recharge" in 3 minutes and drive for four hours --- with no degradation over the lifetime of the vehicle.
“According to the maker it’s being mass produced”. I don’t know, that’s still just speculation that you’re doing based on marketing statements. You haven’t done the actual research.
A new day, a new battery, which, like all other revolutionary batteries, will never make it to the mass market. I am sure it will work perfectly in a presentation
Jon, this is the third video I have seen that hype success using silicon to increase energy density. CATL and BVD have released super batteries. I have to believe that now that Tesla has solved the dry electrode issue they will now move onto batteries with even move silicon. Maybe with the generation 3 battery we will see an even better battery. Could we see an announcement on 10/10?
@@EinzigfreierName Depending on the use case, the per cycle cost is paramount. At $35 per kWh and 1k cycles we have 3.5 cents per kWh battery cost per cycle. At $53/kWh for 10k cycles is a little over a half cent per kWh cycle (think about long-term grid scale value improvement of over 5x).
@@DarylOster Sure, there are a lot of use cases where cycle life matters a lot.. I was mainly thinking about EVs where 1000 cycles should be more than enough.
@@killerhurtalot I believe in a vehicle, battery life matters even more than in pure battery applications. The reason is that after 250k miles (where a typical ICE powered vehicle is junk), the typical EV is still worth about as much as the battery replacement cost - so a battery that lasts several times longer extends the residual value OF THE ENTIRE VEHICLE - not just the battery cost per cycle. The total cost of ownership divided by a million miles instead of 250k miles results in much lower cost per mile. One place where cycle cost is not as important is aircraft - where the most important factors are energy density (for sufficient range) and fast charge time.
Charge speed is not as important (it’s not bad now) as energy density, cost reduction, and battery life. If you can reduce the cost and the size of the battery needed to go an average of 375 miles on full charge would be groundbreaking. I have a 2024 Model 3 LR and charge only every 10 days at home and charge just up to 70% and usually end up around 15-20% SOC in day ten.
Chart sign of charger type sources,at site too show were your power came from law,,,like ingredients on food thing ,,,,any thoughts ,,,,same as power grid to home, business,too raise awareness of real life,,,any thoughts??
Can we get a wind and solar fast charger only , oppion to have the rich to the part in paying the way too there dreams faster . This way you know when no clean product available at this location,,,,coming soon!!!!
Jeff Dahn many years ago had 1 million mile NMC batteries. CATL currently shipping batteries which after 5 years are guaranteed to have zero degradation. Silicon fundamentally is not reliable enough for next gen batteries. So yawn Another battery break through. Seems every day there is some amazing battery tech reported. But we never see these announcements ever turn into products
Battery development is necessarily very slow compared to other tech. The main problem is the time involved in proving the battery chemistry capabilities ( and all the other factors) from inception to production. (And a slight tweak to the chemistry means re-iterating...)
Charge speed is not as important (it’s not bad now) as energy density, cost reduction, and battery life. If you can reduce the cost and the size of the battery needed to go an average of 375 miles on full charge would be groundbreaking. I have a 2024 Model 3 LR and charge only every 10 days at home and charge just up to 70% and usually end up around 15-20% SOC in day ten.
🙋♂️THANKS JON , and your supporters for helping us to keep up on the tech🤗🔋🔋🔋
Well done by beating everyone to the punch. 😊😉
You double the power density you half the cost! You double the charge speed you don't need such big batteries and remove customer concerns 👍
check out amprius batteries
Great video very informative!!!
This is fascinating and anxious to see it in a US made EV.
I like this tech....it is much more viable due to just being a simple to make and it plays nice with current technologies. Most technologies are just pie in the sky due to ability to scale and costs..solid state, etc. Lets keep our fingers crossed!
Good no nonsense information! Thank you1
FOR SOME REASON I'M NOT GETTING NOTIFICATIONS FOR YOUR VIDEOS BUT I'M DEFINITELY SUBSCRIBED WITH THE BELL. I'VE NEVER SEEN THIS BEFORE.
fixing the battery problems -- low range, slow charging, high cost, short lifetime -- will be a great step toward making ev's a reasonable alternative to icvs.
so, your saying evs arent practical?
@@mike_w-tw6jd Poor battery performance is the primary complaint among people who trade in their ev and return to ice. Ice vehicles "recharge" in 3 minutes and drive for four hours --- with no degradation over the lifetime of the vehicle.
Cost, ease of manufacture and cycle life will be the key metrics to watch for this battery.
I think you mean Silicon, not Silicone in the description.
Thanks! That was a typo.
520 Wh/kg: Aviation?
“According to the maker it’s being mass produced”. I don’t know, that’s still just speculation that you’re doing based on marketing statements. You haven’t done the actual research.
They say they can supply "tons"
Thanks for the news.
A new day, a new battery, which, like all other revolutionary batteries, will never make it to the mass market. I am sure it will work perfectly in a presentation
I believe talga has a silicon adnode tech too. As an anode aditive.
Jon, this is the third video I have seen that hype success using silicon to increase energy density. CATL and BVD have released super batteries. I have to believe that now that Tesla has solved the dry electrode issue they will now move onto batteries with even move silicon. Maybe with the generation 3 battery we will see an even better battery. Could we see an announcement on 10/10?
1k cycles is only a tenth as much as the best LFP...
It doesn't matter that much.... 1k cycles on a 250 mile range EV is still 250k miles.....
But the 1000 cycles are most likely from an NMC battery so that's what we should compare it with.
@@EinzigfreierName Depending on the use case, the per cycle cost is paramount. At $35 per kWh and 1k cycles we have 3.5 cents per kWh battery cost per cycle. At $53/kWh for 10k cycles is a little over a half cent per kWh cycle (think about long-term grid scale value improvement of over 5x).
@@DarylOster Sure, there are a lot of use cases where cycle life matters a lot.. I was mainly thinking about EVs where 1000 cycles should be more than enough.
@@killerhurtalot I believe in a vehicle, battery life matters even more than in pure battery applications. The reason is that after 250k miles (where a typical ICE powered vehicle is junk), the typical EV is still worth about as much as the battery replacement cost - so a battery that lasts several times longer extends the residual value OF THE ENTIRE VEHICLE - not just the battery cost per cycle. The total cost of ownership divided by a million miles instead of 250k miles results in much lower cost per mile. One place where cycle cost is not as important is aircraft - where the most important factors are energy density (for sufficient range) and fast charge time.
Charge speed is not as important (it’s not bad now) as energy density, cost reduction, and battery life. If you can reduce the cost and the size of the battery needed to go an average of 375 miles on full charge would be groundbreaking. I have a 2024 Model 3 LR and charge only every 10 days at home and charge just up to 70% and usually end up around 15-20% SOC in day ten.
If the 4680 saga is anything to go by, ..ONLY about another 15 years to production?
Like 10 percent oil ,coal , transformer boost distance in your purchase price ,travel costs percent,you think it just clean ?
Chart sign of charger type sources,at site too show were your power came from law,,,like ingredients on food thing ,,,,any thoughts ,,,,same as power grid to home, business,too raise awareness of real life,,,any thoughts??
While different this sounds similar to Enovix.
Potato battery!!
That takes me back. I made a potato clock and a crystal style radio.
Can we get a wind and solar fast charger only , oppion to have the rich to the part in paying the way too there dreams faster . This way you know when no clean product available at this location,,,,coming soon!!!!
👍
amprius
Jeff Dahn many years ago had 1 million mile NMC batteries. CATL currently shipping batteries which after 5 years are guaranteed to have zero degradation.
Silicon fundamentally is not reliable enough for next gen batteries.
So yawn
Another battery break through. Seems every day there is some amazing battery tech reported. But we never see these announcements ever turn into products
Battery development is necessarily very slow compared to other tech. The main problem is the time involved in proving the battery chemistry capabilities ( and all the other factors) from inception to production. (And a slight tweak to the chemistry means re-iterating...)
If it is available then stop empty talking and just show us a working battery.
Always enjoy ur vids even if its a bit above me sometimes 🤣
Charge speed is not as important (it’s not bad now) as energy density, cost reduction, and battery life. If you can reduce the cost and the size of the battery needed to go an average of 375 miles on full charge would be groundbreaking. I have a 2024 Model 3 LR and charge only every 10 days at home and charge just up to 70% and usually end up around 15-20% SOC in day ten.