Opie & Anthony: Louis CK Got Divorce Advice From Rich Vos (12/13/11)

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 10 гру 2013
  • Louis CK talks about the help he got from Vos year earlier.
    To listen to The Opie & Anthony Show live, five days a week between 6am-10am ET on XM 103 and Sirius 206, subscribe to Sirius XM over at siriusxm.com. For a free 30 day trial, sign up at siriusxm.com/freetrial. Please support the show if you like what they do.
    - @OandAshow: / oandashow
    - @OpieRadio: / opieradio
    - @AnthonyCumia: / anthonycumia
    - @JimNorton: / jimnorton
    - @NotSam: / notsam
    - @ErockRadio: / erockradio
    - @TravisTefft: / travistefft
    - @DennisFalcone: / dennisfalcone
    - @ItsMeScorch: / itsmescorch
    - @Sal617: / sal617
    - Opie & Anthony Facebook: / oandashow
    - Opie Radio Facebook: / opieradiofans
    - Jim Norton Facebook: / 14285152340
    - Opie & Anthony Podcast: itun.es/i6x47tV
    - Opie & Anthony Instagram: / oandashow
    - Opie & Anthony Reddit: / opieandanthony
    - Opie & Anthony 1-Month Audible Subscription: www.audible.com/pd/Comedy/Opie...
    - Opie & Anthony 12-Month Audible Subscription: www.audible.com/pd/Comedy/Opie...
    - Sirius XM: siriusxm.com
    - Sirius XM Free Trial: siriusxm.com/freetrial
    - Opie & Anthony Channel: siriusxm.com/theopie&anthonych...
  • Комедії

КОМЕНТАРІ • 80

  • @SparksDrinker
    @SparksDrinker 10 років тому +111

    "Why would I want to talk to you? You wear a gold rolex and you dont have any money."

  • @gatomercado
    @gatomercado 8 років тому +44

    Louis hit the nail on the head when he breaks down what parents insulting each other does to kids.

    • @kb5652
      @kb5652 8 років тому +2

      +Gato Mercado
      Exactly. I felt exactly what he was talking about when my parents got divorced and one of them talked shit about the other.

  • @SiriusMined
    @SiriusMined 8 років тому +82

    This gives me a new respect for Rich Vos

    • @TheFitz741
      @TheFitz741 4 роки тому

      Easy the silver watch line wasn't thaat good

    • @MrEvanNoyes
      @MrEvanNoyes 3 роки тому

      Respect is a strong word in regard to Vos

    • @tryhardtrynot
      @tryhardtrynot 3 роки тому

      Until you realize he’s the one chewing gum into the fucking microphone.

    • @vincent2053
      @vincent2053 2 роки тому

      @@TheFitz741 Shut up

    • @Chrisdvc26
      @Chrisdvc26 10 місяців тому

      "Dumb Rich Vos"

  • @FSinWCR
    @FSinWCR 10 років тому +76

    "Here's da thing, you should be dodgin' those alimony checks Louis."

  • @byzero8608
    @byzero8608 10 років тому +22

    Louie knew that if he was getting advice from Rich Vos, there was no where to go but up.

  • @frankanderson6339
    @frankanderson6339 10 років тому +56

    I like when we see examples of Vos being mature and that he's a decent dude. Even though they're scarce, it does show that he's a good guy at heart. It makes me wonder, does he try to be stupid? Is it part of an act?

    • @JackTonyMontorrence
      @JackTonyMontorrence 10 років тому +14

      Listen to Vos & Bonnie's podcast to see the real him. Opie & Anthony hone on Vos' stupidity because it's good radio, I'm not saying he doesn't have stupid moments but they overstate them to the point where he's known as an idiot. And as he always says "I KILL ON STAGE!".

    • @davethehostage
      @davethehostage 9 років тому +41

      Joey Mueller Richard is a rare breed. Clever, quick and surprisingly enlightening one moment, drooling buffoon incapable of forming coherent thoughts the next. The man is a treasure.

    • @tylerd80495
      @tylerd80495 8 років тому +3

      +davethehostage I've never seen a better description on Vos.

    • @cartercartercartercar
      @cartercartercartercar 2 роки тому +1

      vos is a great dude. i’ve never even met him

    • @InnerDness
      @InnerDness 2 роки тому

      Rich has a lot of life experience and he's able to soak it in and learn from it, but his combination of the speech impediment (and I don't mean the drool, it just seems like there's a disconnect between what he thinks and what comes out) and his lack of formal education makes a lot of things he says sound stupid. I mean, I'm sure he plays it up, but Vos is genuinely stupid about some things, just not as stupid as he can come across. I think his ability to absorb something and apply it to a given situation right away is also what makes him one of the best counter-punchers out there.

  • @jonathonthomits1322
    @jonathonthomits1322 2 роки тому +9

    Rich used experience and wisdom, not intelligence, to offer practical advice to a friend in need. Louis took that advice and expressed it in a way Vos could never do because Louis is a hyper-intelligent person. This was amazing

  • @Women_Rock
    @Women_Rock 3 роки тому +5

    “Here’s da ting looey”

  • @SparksDrinker
    @SparksDrinker 9 років тому +27

    "Why would I want to talk to you? You wear a gold rolex and you don't have any money."

    • @paul_bellini
      @paul_bellini 7 років тому +8

      "I've got a silver one, too" is the best response.

  • @darkreyule
    @darkreyule 6 років тому +5

    Never heard this, this is awesome! Love Vos even more.

  • @Ranimir
    @Ranimir 10 років тому +19

    Rich Vos giving good advice...its official Hell froze over

    • @mrbucket75
      @mrbucket75 10 років тому +3

      I gotta give you +1 on this.

  • @85privatejoker
    @85privatejoker 6 років тому +8

    Vos should name his special "here's the thing

  • @joeytrimble1558
    @joeytrimble1558 6 років тому +22

    vos is a damn good dude .. jimmy wouldn't have wrote 6 chapters in his book bout his trip up to his stupid wedding if he wasn't decent .. lmfao

    • @dinoradja2980
      @dinoradja2980 3 роки тому +3

      They all shit on vos but they very obviously love him

  • @mrniceguy7168
    @mrniceguy7168 3 роки тому +4

    The Copts are the indigenous people of Egypt, they’re not Arabs or even Muslim. DeRosa is correct if that’s what he meant.

  • @bsklasika
    @bsklasika 3 роки тому +4

    this is what most people miss out on in Rich. they make fun of him because he lets them. in reality he is very wise life-wise. just look on his relationship with ex-wife and his daughters. they make him look so stupid when they joke about him, but in reality everyone loves Rich and everyone respects him a lot because he is genuinely good human being. they all wish they would have personal life of Rich Vos.

  • @deisal273
    @deisal273 Рік тому +1

    “I got a silver one too” Vos is the best

  • @ecoao80
    @ecoao80 10 років тому +6

    Wow, respect to Rich Vos.

  • @alexanderbean7737
    @alexanderbean7737 2 роки тому +2

    Intelligence takes many forms

  • @jordanrioscreations
    @jordanrioscreations 8 років тому +5

    Joe Derosa was actually pretty darn funny here.

  • @TheSlimDuffyShow
    @TheSlimDuffyShow 10 років тому +7

    "I have a big affinity for rich vos" ....Louis is always right, so....

  • @joeytrimble1558
    @joeytrimble1558 6 років тому +2

    "mortgages aren't what you think they are"

  • @BrianScalabrineMVP
    @BrianScalabrineMVP 5 років тому +1

    I love vos so much

  • @frankanderson6339
    @frankanderson6339 10 років тому +6

    Have they ever asked Vos what the "thing" is?

  • @DexFlames
    @DexFlames 10 років тому +2

    I laughed so hard when Louis said "Yeah... on 9/11."
    Why did I laugh? What the fuck.

    • @SparksDrinker
      @SparksDrinker 10 років тому

      because you're a dummy? thats my best guess.

    • @BXBZ88
      @BXBZ88 10 років тому +15

      Ant made the joke.

  • @OFFICIAL863JLS
    @OFFICIAL863JLS 6 років тому +4

    How can one not love vos

  • @andreaholcock8992
    @andreaholcock8992 Рік тому

    You ever sheen the inshide of a BMW, Louishhh?

  • @Michael-hw5wk
    @Michael-hw5wk 20 днів тому

    I don't need this as I will never get married. I have been objective enough to assess my previous relationships and know what type of lady I am compatible with, and I can safely say that such a woman does not exist in my state (and even if she did, I would not be able to get her as I am retired and will NEVER work the types of jobs others wish to force me into).

  • @Amp1771
    @Amp1771 10 років тому +1

    Wow they really took this one seriously

  • @NJRIII
    @NJRIII 4 роки тому +2

    He's an important person. Legend

  • @newtoy7791
    @newtoy7791 3 роки тому +1

    Ant: "Like locusts in a pussy field." 3:40

  • @furnacefire
    @furnacefire 10 років тому +4

    Hmm...My advice to you is get married: if you find a good wife you'll be happy; if not, you'll become a philosopher.
    Socrates
    Any other philosophers out there?
    In all seriousness, anyone who SUBMITS for a LICENSE to get approval to engage in a relationship is terribly misguided. Religion ( the church ) and Legalese ( the state ) are one in the same. Until one becomes a self responsible adult, one should never be involved in a relationship. There are far too many adult BODIES walking around with the minds of spoiled rotten children. If you let go of your ego, you will know this to be true.

    • @merces47letifer4
      @merces47letifer4 9 років тому +4

      You are a lonely dude with most likely a good bit of flab.

  • @hisoj
    @hisoj 5 років тому +1

    I wonder what CK stands for. does the K stand for King? I wonder what the C stands for.

    • @fro_e
      @fro_e Місяць тому

      Cock

    • @AlexSmith-dh1oz
      @AlexSmith-dh1oz Місяць тому

      It’s roughly how you pronounce his real last name (Szekely)

    • @fro_e
      @fro_e Місяць тому

      Cock

  • @Hallucinato444
    @Hallucinato444 4 роки тому +1

    This clip is going well and randomly in the middle of it you hear Joe derosa in studio

  • @adolphsanchez1429
    @adolphsanchez1429 Рік тому

    I'm glad I never had kids. I have had some wonderful girlfriends (regardless of what they think about me), but I had one awful ex and...Jesus, some people are just evil and completely unthinking.

  • @Heavilymoderated
    @Heavilymoderated Рік тому

    I think the Anthonys parents divorce was totally his fault.

  • @franceshaypenny8481
    @franceshaypenny8481 10 років тому +4

    All this wisdom Louie and Rich learned from divorce, if it had been applied during the damn marriage like it's supposed to be, would have saved the marriage and created a harmonious life for all concerned. People too often think marriage is all about fickle romantic feelings - but being in love doesn't even make the top 5 in terms of what makes it work, especially where kids are involved. Both parties are supposed to act with love, regardless of what you actually feel because feelings change - that's why we take vows - to promise to behave a certain way for the sake of the health of the whole family. Children need a mother and a father [see: evolution] - they were 'born that way', if you will, and we need to stop putting our own shit ahead of their needs if things are ever going to improve in this fucked up country. Just sayin'.

    • @potsos
      @potsos 10 років тому +11

      Children still have two parents after divorce if they are reasonable people. If they're not, they could remain married and be just as useless. Vows are a pleasant notion, but the fact is that miserable people can make miserable parents. If people were more practical about their relationships and were honest with themselves about whether or not they really want to be with one person for the rest of their lives, maybe they wouldn't rush into marriage so quickly.

  • @godihateyoupeople7173
    @godihateyoupeople7173 9 років тому +12

    Louis can come off as really condescending sometimes.

    • @14degreesoc78
      @14degreesoc78 9 років тому

      Yes he does

    • @killingjokeonmeth
      @killingjokeonmeth 9 років тому

      Because everyone Jones he is the funniest Guy in the room

    • @stazi7532
      @stazi7532 9 років тому +1

      Playing a character

    • @seph_f
      @seph_f 9 років тому +2

      you humorless fuck

    • @HarbleSnarf
      @HarbleSnarf 9 років тому +5

      I love louis but he does this pretty often. He has that smug liberal new yorker thing for sure.

  • @TheEmpireHaxor
    @TheEmpireHaxor 10 років тому

    "We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, ensure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America." - Preamble to the Constitution
    The Constitution of the United States of America is the supreme law of the United States. Empowered with the sovereign authority of the people by the framers and the consent of the legislatures of the states, it is the source of all government powers, and also provides important limitations on the government that protect the fundamental rights of United States citizens.
    Read the full text of the Constitution
    Why a Constitution? | The Constitutional Convention
    Ratification | The Bill of Rights
    Why a Constitution?
    The need for the Constitution grew out of problems with the Articles of Confederation, which established a "firm league of friendship" between the states, and vested most power in a Congress of the Confederation. This power was, however, extremely limited - the central government conducted diplomacy and made war, set weights and measures, and was the final arbiter of disputes between the states. Crucially, it could not raise any funds itself, and was entirely dependent on the states themselves for the money necessary to operate. Each state sent a delegation of between two and seven members to the Congress, and they voted as a bloc with each state getting one vote. But any decision of consequence required a unanimous vote, which led to a government that was paralyzed and ineffectual.
    A movement to reform the Articles began, and invitations to attend a convention in Philadelphia to discuss changes to the Articles were sent to the state legislatures in 1787. In May of that year, delegates from 12 of the 13 states (Rhode Island sent no representatives) convened in Philadelphia to begin the work of redesigning government. The delegates to the Constitutional Convention quickly began work on drafting a new Constitution for the United States.
    The Constitutional Convention
    A chief aim of the Constitution as drafted by the Convention was to create a government with enough power to act on a national level, but without so much power that fundamental rights would be at risk. One way that this was accomplished was to separate the power of government into three branches, and then to include checks and balances on those powers to assure that no one branch of government gained supremacy. This concern arose largely out of the experience that the delegates had with the King of England and his powerful Parliament. The powers of each branch are enumerated in the Constitution, with powers not assigned to them reserved to the states.
    Much of the debate, which was conducted in secret to ensure that delegates spoke their minds, focused on the form that the new legislature would take. Two plans competed to become the new government: the Virginia Plan, which apportioned representation based on the population of each state, and the New Jersey plan, which gave each state an equal vote in Congress. The Virginia Plan was supported by the larger states, and the New Jersey plan preferred by the smaller. In the end, they settled on the Great Compromise (sometimes called the Connecticut Compromise), in which the House of Representatives would represent the people as apportioned by population; the Senate would represent the states apportioned equally; and the President would be elected by the Electoral College. The plan also called for an independent judiciary.
    The founders also took pains to establish the relationship between the states. States are required to give "full faith and credit" to the laws, records, contracts, and judicial proceedings of the other states, although Congress may regulate the manner in which the states share records, and define the scope of this clause. States are barred from discriminating against citizens of other states in any way, and cannot enact tariffs against one another. States must also extradite those accused of crimes to other states for trial.
    The founders also specified a process by which the Constitution may be amended, and since its ratification, the Constitution has been amended 27 times. In order to prevent arbitrary changes, the process for making amendments is quite onerous. An amendment may be proposed by a two-thirds vote of both Houses of Congress, or, if two-thirds of the states request one, by a convention called for that purpose. The amendment must then be ratified by three-fourths of the state legislatures, or three-fourths of conventions called in each state for ratification. In modern times, amendments have traditionally specified a timeframe in which this must be accomplished, usually a period of several years. Additionally, the Constitution specifies that no amendment can deny a state equal representation in the Senate without that state's consent.
    With the details and language of the Constitution decided, the Convention got down to the work of actually setting the Constitution to paper. It is written in the hand of a delegate from Pennsylvania, Gouverneur Morris, whose job allowed him some reign over the actual punctuation of a few clauses in the Constitution. He is also credited with the famous preamble, quoted at the top of this page. On September 17, 1787, 39 of the 55 delegates signed the new document, with many of those who refused to sign objecting to the lack of a bill of rights. At least one delegate refused to sign because the Constitution codified and protected slavery and the slave trade.
    Ratification
    The process set out in the Constitution for its ratification provided for much popular debate in the states. The Constitution would take effect once it had been ratified by nine of the thirteen state legislatures -- unanimity was not be required. During the debate over the Constitution, two factions emerged: the Federalists, who supported adoption, and the Anti-Federalists, who opposed it.
    James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, and John Jay set out an eloquent defense of the new Constitution in what came to be called the Federalist Papers. Published anonymously in the newspapers The Independent Journal and The New York Packet under the name Publius between October 1787 and August 1788, the 85 articles that comprise the Federalist Papers remain to this day an invaluable resource for understanding some of the framers' intentions for the Constitution. The most famous of the articles are No. 10, which warns of the dangers of factions and advocates a large republic, and No. 51, which explains the structure of the Constitution, its checks and balances, and how it protects the rights of the people.
    The states proceeded to begin ratification, with some debating more intensely than others. Delaware was the first state to ratify, on December 7, 1787. After New Hampshire became the ninth state to ratify, on June 22, 1788, the Confederation Congress established March 9, 1789, as the date to begin operating under the Constitution. By this time, all the states except North Carolina and Rhode Island had ratified - the Ocean State was the last to ratify on May 29, 1790.
    The Bill of Rights
    One of the principal points of contention between the Federalists and Anti-Federalists was the lack of an enumeration of basic civil rights in the Constitution. Many Federalists argued, as in Federalist No. 84, that the people surrendered no rights in adopting the Constitution. In several states, however, the ratification debate in some states hinged on the adoption of a bill of rights. The solution was known as the Massachusetts Compromise, in which four states ratified the Constitution but at the same time sent recommendations for amendments to the Congress.
    James Madison introduced 12 amendments to the First Congress in 1789. Ten of these would go on to become what we now consider to be the Bill of Rights. One was never passed, while another dealing with Congressional salaries was not ratified until 1992, when it became the 27th Amendment. Based on the Virginia Declaration of Rights, the English Bill of Rights, the writings of the Enlightenment, and the rights defined in the Magna Carta, the Bill of Rights contains rights that many today consider to be fundamental to America.
    The First Amendment provides that Congress make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting its free exercise. It protects freedom of speech, the press, assembly, and the right to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
    The Second Amendment gives citizens the right to bear arms.
    The Third Amendment prohibits the government from quartering troops in private homes, a major grievance during the American Revolution.
    The Fourth Amendment protects citizens from unreasonable search and seizure. The government may not conduct any searches without a warrant, and such warrants must be issued by a judge and based on probable cause.
    The Fifth Amendment provides that citizens not be subject to criminal prosecution and punishment without due process. Citizens may not be tried on the same set of facts twice, and are protected from self-incrimination (the right to remain silent). The amendment also establishes the power of eminent domain, ensuring that private property is not seized for public use without just compensation.
    The Sixth Amendment assures the right to a speedy trial by a jury of one's peers, to be informed of the crimes with which they are charged, and to confront the witnesses brought by the government. The amendment also provides the accused the right to compel testimony from witnesses, and to legal representation.
    The Seventh Amendment provides that civil cases also be tried by jury.
    The Eighth Amendment prohibits excessive bail, excessive fines, and cruel and unusual punishments.
    The Ninth Amendment states that the list of rights enumerated in the Constitution is not exhaustive, and that the people retain all rights not enumerated.
    The Tenth Amendment assigns all powers not delegated to the United States, or prohibited to the states, to either the states or to the people.