Trigger Warning: Ash'aris | Clip | Abu Mussab Wajdi Akkari
Вставка
- Опубліковано 4 вер 2024
- Divine attributes mentioned in the Qur’an and Sunnah are to be affirmed (as understood by the early generations (salaf) of this ummah, namely the Sahaabah, Taabi‘een, and leading scholars) without discussing how or likening Him to His creation, and without denying any of His attributes or interpreting them in a way different from the apparent meaning.
Imam Abu Ja‘far Muhammad ibn Jareer at-Tabari said:
If someone were to say: What is the proper approach with regard to the meaning of these attributes that you have mentioned, some of which are mentioned in the Book and revelation of Allah, may He be glorified and exalted, and some were mentioned by the Messenger of Allah (salla'Allaahu 'alayhi wa sallam)?
Our response is: The correct approach in our view is to affirm the meaning in a real sense, without likening Him to His creation, as Allah said of Himself in the Qur’an: “There is nothing like unto Him, and He is the All-Hearer, the All-Seer” [ash-Shoora 42:11]. So we affirm all of the meanings that we said are mentioned in the reports and the Qur’an and the revelation according to their apparent meaning, and we reject any likening of Him to His creation. Hence we say: He, may He be glorified and exalted, hears all sounds, but not through a hole in an ear or through any physical faculty like those of the sons of Adam. Similarly, He sees all people with vision that is not like the vision of the sons of Adam, which is a physical faculty of theirs. He has two hands, a right hand, and fingers, but not in a physical sense; rather His two hands are outstretched, bestowing blessings upon creation, not withholding good. And He has a countenance or face, but it is not like the physical faces of the sons of Adam that are made of flesh and blood. We say that He smiles upon whomever He will of His creation, but we do not say that this is showing teeth (like a human smile); and He descends every night to the lowest heaven.
End quote from Tabseer fi Ma‘aalim ad-Deen
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
❌TYPO: minute 03:03 Soorah Al-Ikhlaas 112:4
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Clip from:
🎧 #10 Tafseer As-Sa'di: Soorah Ash-Shu`arâ' | Aayahs 218-227
👉 • #10 Tafseer As-Sa'di: ...
RELATED VIDEOS:
🎧 Aqeedah Class | 36 Allaah's Face
👉 • Al-Aqeedatul-Waasitiyy...
“Everything will perish save His Face” [al-Qasas 28:88].
“And the Face of your Lord full of Majesty and Honour will abide forever” [ar-Rahmaan 55:27].
🎧 Aqeedah Class | 38 Allaah's Eyes
👉 • Al-Aqeedatul-Waasitiyy...
“Allah is not hidden from you, He is not one-eyed.” And he pointed with his hand towards his eye, adding, “Indeed Al-Maseeh Ad-Dajjāl is blind in the right eye and his eye looks like a protruding grape.” [Bukhāri]
“…In order that you may be brought up under My Eye.” [20:39]
“[It was] sailing under Our Eyes, a reward for him who had been rejected.” [54:14]
🎧 Aqeedah Class | 37 Allaah's Hands
👉 • Al-Aqeedatul-Waasitiyy...
“(Allah) said: ‘O Iblees (Satan)! What prevents you from prostrating yourself to one whom I have created with Both My Hands’” [Saad 38:75].
🎧 Aqeedah Class | 58 Affirming Allaah's Foot, Speech, and Voice
👉 • Al-Aqeedatul-Waasitiyy...
Anas ibn Maalik, according to which the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) said: “Hell will keep saying, ‘Are there any more (to come)?’ until the Lord of Glory, may He be blessed and exalted, places His foot on it, then it will say, ‘Enough, enough, by Your glory!’ And all its parts will be integrated together.
The Prophet (salla'Allaahu 'alayhi wa sallam) said: “Hell and Paradise disputed, and Hell said: ‘I have been favoured with the arrogant and proud.’ Paradise said: ‘What is the matter with me, that no one will enter me except the weak, humble, and downtrodden?’ Allah, may He be blessed and exalted, said to Paradise: ‘You are My mercy by which I will show mercy to whomsoever I will of My slaves.’ And He said to Hell: ‘You are My punishment with which I will punish whomsoever I will of My slaves. And each of you will be full.’ As for Hell, it will not be full until Allah, may He be blessed and exalted, places His foot on it and it says, ‘Enough, enough.’ Then it will be full and all its parts will be integrated together, and Allah will not treat any of His creation unjustly. As for Paradise, Allah will create a creation just for it.” Bukhari & Muslim
Ibn ‘Abbaas said: “The Kursiy (footstool) is the place of the two feet, and the size of Throne cannot be known.”
Classed as saheeh by al-Albaani
In Fataawa al-Lajnah ad-Daa’imah it says: What we must do is affirm that which Allah has affirmed for Himself, such as two hands, two feet, fingers and other attributes that are mentioned in the Qur’an and Sunnah, in a manner that is befitting to Allah, may He be glorified, without distorting the meaning, discussing how, likening Him to His creation or denying any of His attributes.
🎧 Aqeedah PLAYLIST:
• Al-Aqeedatul-Waasitiyyah
#aqeedah #onewaytoparadise
Alhamdulillah. I thought I was dumb for not being able to comprehend their philosophical arguments but Allah made Islam easy to understand.
How many were there inside the cave in surah kahf ? or where is yajaj majaj iron wall?
@@captainjackuniversal we do not need to concern with the unseen. We hear and we believe. Simple as that.
@@ibnamanot so basically not using your unused brain?
Allahuma Barik, what a wonderful clip. The last video about Daniel was also very informative and beneficial. May Allah increase you in knowledge, bless you and your family and have mercy on you
Attentive From Senegal. May Allah grant us His Ma'iyah and His Ridwaan. Aameen
BaarakalLaahu fiikum brother.
Ameen
Alhamdulillah u for the dua'at sticking to the authenticity of the religion including Sheikh Assim al hakeem. May Allah keep u all and us steadfast............
May Allah bless you and keep you firm. بارك الله فيك
Allah*
May Allah grant you best of both worlds for preaching authentic Islam without sugar coating or watering down ameen 😊👌
Great editing job Mussab! Baarakallahu feek.
Excellent explanation brother Abu Musa'ab, always keeping it real and simple, Baarakah Allahu Feek ‼️
JazzakAllahu khairan Abu Mussab
Jazak Allah kheir ya Abi Mussab. Please speak of this more because I am afraid many are being deviated by these greek philosophical approaches to understanding Allah instead of relying on the manifest truth which can only be found in the Quran and Sunnah.
Ustad Abdur Rehman got criticism for arranging debates with ahlul biddah. He invited bro Hajji to a debate for example. No one is safe akhi. Even the salafies are criticizing eachother. Its the issue we all face so its better to relax and keep quoting sources.
Debating is okay the salaf debated ahlul bidah too but there are conditions and principles.
Tragically there are some people who claim to subscribe to the ‘hanafi fiqh’ (they are mainly from the south part of a large continent) and they are spreading the view that athari and ash’ari creed nowadays is ‘very close’ because ‘finding’ the ‘pure’ athari creed is very difficult to find today and so it’s ok to stick to ‘ash’ari’ or ‘athari’! The people who are attached to these ‘institutions’ are typically non-Arabic speaking masses who don’t have the expertise to counter these ‘mawlanas’ and tell them that there is indeed a big difference between ‘athari’ and ‘ash’ari’ methodologies. They are also doing a big dis-service to the ‘hanafi fiqh’ because imam Abu hanifah (RA) was a hero and intellectual giant and never ever got confused about such imp aspects!
Imam Abu Hanifah was a giant Athari Imam.
@@MuhammadAli-mz4pq agreed 100% his master piece in this regard was the doctrine ‘we don’t question ‘how” as in how does Allah descend, how are Allah’s hands etc.
@@Quantum-1157 But you now have people like HY, who literally adds words in his books of Aqeedah like Fiqh ul-Akbar.
@@Quantum-1157 Akhi never let an Ashari hijack the deen of Islam, nor any Imams of ours.
@@MuhammadAli-mz4pq but the immams like malik shafe humble bukharee thawri dont accept him as a aalim.
immam malik opinion about abu hanifa is that he was from ahle rai
abu fallanah this name was given by immam ahmed bin humble to abu hanifa.
immam bukharee called him kufee and you see at the time of immam bukharee he don't accept narrations from the people of kufa.
he was a munker hadees and he used to stop people from ahadees there is a book by immam wakee in this book immam wakee explains how abu hanifa told him to stop working in the field of ahadees.
immam shafee and muhammad ibnul hassan as shebani ooinion is in the musnad sheuba and both agrred that if he doesn't have the knowledge of ahadees knowledge of the seerah of profet muhammadur rasoolullah sal lal lahu alie hi wasalam don't have the knowledge of the seerah of narrators on what basis he can go for qiyas and in end they gave both equal opinion that he was not qualified to give rulings in the matters of islam.
Asharis: "We need to understand the Quran and Sunnah through the lenses of theological sophistry because the intellect is the overall judge even though Allah said otherwise."
Although the elder of them will say this directly, the junior will espouse this in an indirect manner.
Where does Allah say otherwise. Allah tells us in the Quran to use the Aql and ponder
@@Hamza000h Don't you understand the difference between the two.
The quran tells us to use ‘aql’ . What are you talking about
@@Hamza000h Yes use the aql and ponder does not mean "well my aql tells me x-y-z therefore Allah cant have certain attributes, we must interpret them or leave their meanings because my aql tells me to and Allah said use your aql." Where will you stop?
"What kinda ludicrous, mumbo-jumbo, chickiddy-chick-cheese chicken are you french-frying in your oven!?"
Best clip intro EVER! 😆
Lol yes 💀😂
😆😆😂
True that. Lol
Lool
Best intro to catch listeners 🤣🤣🤣🤣
Thank you Abu Mussab. It's always a pleasure listening to you!
Jazaakumullaahu khayran
Jazak'Allah Khairan. The editing is on point.
جزاك الله خيرا
The people who deny Allah’s attributes are committing the major sin of و ان تقولوا على الله ما لا تعلمون to say about Allah that which you don’t know. They have become one with this sin as they say it with their mouths and believe it with their hearts. May Allah protect us from falling into such grave error. May Allah reward all the scholars and callers who teach the proper belief found in the Quran and sunnah.
Ameen
Denying attributes of Allah is kufr akbar, meaning denying Tawheed
Assalamu alaykum, the reference for Soorah Al-Ikhlaas needs to be corrected at 3:04. Barakallah feek
What was wrong?
@@OneWayToParadise Qur'an reference of 42:11 is shown for Soorah Al-Ikhlaas
I am not gossipping, but Jake the meta what what, that guy came from Quran only but he is now philosophy only. Calling out Br Saajid for nothing. I watched his video about Saajid and he downplayed the Quran and Sunnah by saying philosophy is not for the layman. Wallahi the arrogance if the egoistic people of Ilm ul kalaam
Basically undermining the Quran and the Sunnah. By preferring other tools as there alternatives.
He did not downplay the Quran and Sunnah, he said that there are double standards with brothers being ok with “scientific miracles” of the Quran, or linguistic miracles of the Quran, but being against philosophy
@@nabeel8194 scientific miracles are not philosophy
@@anonymousnoticer Do you even know what science is? It seems you need to watch some videos about the philosophy of science and what it actually is. Laughable. You have exposed your ignorance.
@Ismail AH yes, but neither are direct arguments found in the Quran and Sunnah. Hence, the double standard
6:02 And according to you, scholars from the past and present ascribing themselves to the Asha’irah have all erred in their aqeedah while at the same time authoring great beneficial works for the ummah in Fiqh,Hadith etc. Allah bestowed them with sooo much of Ilm to author books which benefit the ummah but didn’t bestow the correct understanding of aqeedah on them. Is that what you’re suggesting? Or are you suggesting ignorance on their part for not understanding the Islamic doctrines properly before delving into other fields? You may say that authoring beneficial works is not a sign of being on the right aqeedah. Ok fair enough. But what about the vast number of scholars ascribing to the creed of Ashairah. Have all of them erred?
The reply to your last question is, yes. They did great in fiqh, hadith and other fields. But what has to be said, is said in the end. They had erred. We don't judge the right path based on how many great scholars followed that. We judge it according to the Quran, the sunnah and the understanding of the salaf. Funnily enough, asharis can never find any evidence of our prophet or the sahabas believing in a creed like that of asha'irah. They believe that the salaf were mufawwidheen, and thus they attribute ignorance to our Prophet and the sahaba.
Just ask yourself some simple questions, did Allah find it hard to describe Himself? Was our prophet ignorant and spoke about what he didn't know? Did he and his companions believe in what was said to them by being ignorant of it?
Bringing up how many scholars were upon asha'irah won't help akhi
@@ibn_karim “They believe that the salaf were mufawwidheen,” the salaf didn’t do tafweedh at all???
abul hassan ashrai the founder of this group.
why he makes ruju of his own aqeeda.read the book al ibanah and the writer of this book is abul hassan ashrai.
@@95Gred Oh man, the ignorance of this statement. Ibn Abbas did tafweed and ta'wil of so many of the sifat such as saq and kursi. Read tafsir al Qurtubi.
The thumbnail 😭👍
Absolute Gold.
The shake of shakes killed me. The editing is just خير 😂😂😂
Assalamu alaikum wa Rahmatullah WA barakaathahu.
For ease of understanding can we just say Allah has something that serves the purpose of face, hands etc. Meaning Allah uses something to touch and hold like we use our hand?
So when Allah has hands it's only based on its purpose.
Wa Alaykum Assalaam Wa Rahmatullaah wa Barakaatuh
No we don't. We affirm what Allaah affirmed and we do not use words that were not used. Please refer to the Aqeedah playlist and watch the classes so you can better understand what to believe.
ua-cam.com/play/PLxQ71pF_GAtHJYlz6c2VsmbKdDiBVuEVQ.html
Why does your Shaykh Uthaymeen say that Allah has two eyes??
You have no leg to stand on when it comes to Aqeedah. Your scholars are mujasimah giving Allah body part naudhibillah.
Go correct your iman before trying to critique the asharis, matiridis or atharis
Because Allah does
Lol wait now ....
Abu Bakr Ibn Khuzaymah, died 311H (رحمه الله) stated:
“We say: Our Lord, the Creator, has two eyes and He sees with them what is beneath the soil, and what is beneath the seventh and lowest earth, and what is in the highest heavens, and whatever is between them, whether small or great…” (Kitāb At-Tawheed p. 52, Dār Al-Kitāb Al-Ilmiyyah)
Abu al-Hasan Alee ad-Daraqutnee (d. 385H), brings in his "Kitaab us-Sifaat, with his chain of narration:
Muhammad bin Makhlad narrated to us: Muhammad bin Muhammad bin Umar bin al-Hakam Abu al-Hasan al-Ataa said: I heard Muhammad bin Mus'ab al-Aabid saying:
Whoever claims that you do not speak and will not be seen in the Hereafter, then He is a kaafir (disbeliever) in your Face, and he does not know you. I bear witness that you are above the Throne, above the seventh heaven and it is not as your enemies, the zanaadiqah (heretics) say.
Muhammad bin Mus'ab was one of the pious worshipers and reciters, he was praised by Imaam Ahmad bin Hanbal who described him with being upon the Sunnah, and Abu al-Hasan al-Attaar narrated from him. He was thiqah, and a reciter of the Book of Allaah. He died in 228H, refer to Taareekh Bagdhaad (3/279) of al-Khateeb. And al-Khateeb al-Baghdaadee also reported this athar with the same isnaad in Tareekh Baghdaad (3/280). And it is also found in as-Sunnah of Abdullaah bin Imaam Ahmad (1/182).
Source: "Kitaab us-Sifaat" of ad-Daraqutnee (tahqeeq Alee Naasir al-Faqeehee), no. 64, p 72.
وَلَمْ يَكُن لَّهُۥ كُفُوًا أَحَدٌۢ
112:4
There is absolutely nothing like Him
Rather than obscure quotes which go against sound aqeedah and can be easily contested. I don't need to bring any other evidence except the above Quran ayah.
Giving Allah a description of two eyes LIKE that of humans and beasts goes against clear verses of the Quran and clear hadith. Nauzibillah
@@nasmoh7182 ok innovator
Asha'irah are prevalent in Indonesia and some Malaysia and Singapore, these creed are mostly what the Muslim in Nusantara is practising
Narrated Hudhaifa bin Al-Yaman:
The people used to ask Allah's Messenger (ﷺ peace and blessings be upon him) about the good but I used to ask about evil lest I should be overtaken by it. So I said, "O Allah's Messenger (ﷺ peace and blessings be upon him)! We were living in ignorance and in an (extremely) worst atmosphere, then Allah brought to us this good (Islam); will there be any evil after this good?" He said, "Yes."
(Mutzailah? - Prophet Muhammad peace and blessings on him said best generation is the first 3, avg. age is 60 - 70 year. 11h. + 70 x 3 = 220h. when the Mutazila Mihna took place, Imam ibn Hanbal lived through is why Ibn Kathir states his mathhab is strongest with the Sunna...)
I said, 'Will there be any good after that evil?" He replied, "Yes, but it will be tainted'' I asked, "What will be its taint?" He replied, "Some will guide others not according to my tradition? You will approve of some of their deeds and disapprove of others."
(Asharis? - as Imam Ashari raised mutazila and as he aged became more Athari but his old views still spread mixing truth & falsehood - they had 3 cycles, Suljuks to cross - aids aided by shi'a, Ayubids to Monguls aided by shi'a & Uthmanis to europe aided by shi'as...)
I asked, "Will there be any evil after that good?" He replied, "Yes, some people calling at the gates of the Nar, and whoever will respond to their call, will be thrown by them into the Nar." I said, "O Allah s Apostle! Will you describe them to us?" He said, "They will be from our own people and will speak our language."
(Ikwanis? - a response to the fallen Ashari sufi Uthmanis with the same bida that fell them & more when Ibn Adbul Wahab's dawa could of saved them, ikwanis mix sufism, shi'aism and masonry - as Sh. Albani said they treated the illness with illness)
I said, "What do you order me to do if such a state should take place in my life?" He said, "Stick to the group of Muslims and their Imam (ruler)." I said, "If there is neither a group of Muslims nor an Imam (ruler)?" He said, "Then turn away from all those sects even if you were to bite (eat) the roots of a tree till death overtakes you while you are in that state."
- Sahih al-Bukhari 7084, Afflictions and the End of the World
...
Enter Banu Tamim, name of the tribe of Ibn Abdul Wahab, the in laws of Aal Saud... (Hadith on Banu Tamim is the hardest on dajjal and there will be a group on truth until the descent of Jesus in end times...)
@@awatcher19 well the ikwanis were founded by sufis... and the sufis have mysterious origins, some say much of it is pre Islamic too.
@Rose Kakkarot
But not all Nusantara are Asha'irah
Bukan semua Nusantara adalah Asha'irah
@@faizal85z I know THAT'S why I said MOSTLY not ALL.
💯
2:55 Can someone cite the hadith about the shin?
The shin is mentioned in an Ayah of the Qur’an.
Holy Quran 68:42
------------------
يَوْمَ يُكْشَفُ عَنْ سَاقٍ وَيُدْعَوْنَ إِلَى السُّجُودِ فَلَا يَسْتَطِيعُونَ
(Remember) the Day when the Shin shall be laid bare (i.e. the Day of Resurrection) and they shall be called to prostrate (to Allah), but they (hypocrites) shall not be able to do so,
Did Mussab do the editing, it's DOPE!!
Allahuma barik lahu
Someone's talking about himself...
Can I attend the classes because I don’t know arabiy
Yes, of course. He just reads the Arabic text, then translates and explains in English.
@@OneWayToParadise 👍🏽🤝
Asharis may have some mistakes in their Aqeedah, but they don't amount to shirk.
But some salafis and wahhabis say Allah has limbs. This could amount to shirk and it's worse.
We don't say Allaah has limbs. Stop lying. We simply affirm what Allaah affirmed for Himself. Who are you to deny Allaah's own words and His choices? How dare you reject what Allaah said about Himself? You don't think that constitutes Shirk? That is just like the Jews.
@@OneWayToParadise I didnt say you specifically, but I've seen many of your viewers saying Allah has limbs. Many wahhabis share this idea and the others ignore them.
I never rejected what Allah has said for himself. I'm not an ashari, and I accept whatever Allah affirmed for himself. You have falsely accused me of something and you will be accountable for this slander.
6:33 Important point.
Allah can interact w/ His creation has will. Tawhid is balanced path!
To deny Allah's Siffat due to Aristotle substance theory is another din, & call bias logic is a lie. To say Allah's siffat are idol parts is Quran 53 :19 paganism. To deny He exist over His Throne is atheist firaun, Quran 40:37, it isn't a limit, Quran 4:126.
Pagan Qayraish : Praise Al-lat wa Al-uzza.
Belal : AHAD, AHAD
He rejects pagan Qayraish ideas of Allah's Siffat are parts like sadly Asharis view, see Tafsir Quran 53 :19 & he knows Allah is ONE! - Ibn Majah 150, Book of Sunna!
---
I was watching a debate with Shamsi and josh the yeahood, he kept saying God has this description but he has no attribute, sounds just like the jahmiyah who say the Quran is created... and Allah has no attributes, o Sunnis take the middle course, affirm and don't liken!
Technically Yes. This was one of the reasons why the Ahul-Kitab were misguided.
Internet canexion. Arab humor is mind-blowing.
6:33 this part, LoL 💀😆
Lol. He's really good with imitating accents
@@achrafagermoune2417 yupp 😂
Allah is also noor ?
Who is he referring to?
We live in a time where an ashari would affirm Allah rose over the throne(so far I only met one ustadh) and someone who called themselves salafi while at the same time trying to justify philosophy.
What they will do about the tens of thousands of statement from the Salaf than? The Ashariyyah just puts a blind eye to them and pretend they do not exist.
Statements like.
"Whoever claims that you (Allah) do not speak, nor can You be seen in the hereafter, then he has disbelieved in You and does not know You. I testify that you are above your throne, above the seven heavens, not as your enemies the heretical apostate say".
(Muhammad Bin Mussab Al-Abid 228 A.H)
"Whoever claims that Allah is here (on this earth) is a filthy Jahmi. Verily Allah is above the throne and His knowledge encompass everything in the earth and the Heavens".
(Abdul Al-Warrraq 250 A.H)
"Verily Allah is above the throne, separate from his creation. His knowledge encompass everything. No one differs from this except for a Jahmi who mixes Allah with His creation".
(Yahya bin Muadh Ar-Razi 258 A.H)
"They have said worse than the Jews and the Christians. Indeed the Jews, Christians and the people of religion have agreed with the Muslims that Allah is above his throne. And they (Jahmiyyah) say that there is nothing over the throne".
(Saeed bin Ammir Ad-Duba'i 208 A.H)
"Beware of the opinions of the Jahm, for indeed they try and say that Allah is not above the heavens. This is nothing but inspirations from the Shaytaan, it is nothing but disbelief".
(Wahb bin Jarir 206 A.H)
"It was said to Jahm, describe for us your Rabb that you worship. He (Jahm) entered his house and didn't leave. Than after a few days he came out to them and said, He is the air with everything, and he is in everything, and nothing is hidden from him. Abu Muadh said, the enemy of Allah has lied. Indeed Allah is above his throne the way he describe himself".
(Abu Muadh Khalid bin Suleiman Al-Balkhi 199 A.H)
"Indeed the Jahmiyyah want to negate that Allah spoke to Musa (May Allah be pleased with him), and that Allah is a above his throne. I believed they should be asked to repent, they either repent or they are beheaded".
(Abdur Rahman bin Mahdi 197 A.H)
"The beginning of the speech of the Jahmiyyah is honey, and the end of it is poison. Indeed they are trying to say that there is no Illah above the heavens".
(Jabir bin Abdul Hameed Ad-Dabbi 188 A.H)
Abu Mutee al-Balkhi said, "I asked Abu Haneefah about the one who say, I do not know if my Rabb is above the heavens or on the earth. He said, he has certainly disbelieved because Allah said,
Ta Ha 20:5
ٱلرَّحْمَٰنُ عَلَى ٱلْعَرْشِ ٱسْتَوَىٰ
The Most Gracious (Allâh) rose over (Istawâ) the (Mighty) Throne (in a manner that suits His).
I said, if he then say, I do say he rose over his throne but I do not whether his throne is above the heavens or in the earth, He said, if he denies that Allah Allah is above the heavens then he has disbelieved".
Abdullah Ibn Mubarak said, "We do not believe this statement like the Jahmiyyah, who says Allah is on the earth, whoever he is above his throne, just as he described himself".
He further said to a Jahmi, Is your stomach empty from him (Allah), and he was shocked (and could not answer).
Imam Al-Bukhari said Quran is the Kalam of Allah (in the mushaf as well its recitation), and he presented this ayat.
Al-A'raf 7:54
إِنَّ رَبَّكُمُ ٱللَّهُ ٱلَّذِى خَلَقَ ٱلسَّمَٰوَٰتِ وَٱلۡأَرۡضَ فِى سِتَّةِ أَيَّامٍ ثُمَّ ٱسۡتَوَىٰ عَلَى ٱلۡعَرۡشِ يُغۡشِى ٱلَّيۡلَ ٱلنَّهَارَ يَطۡلُبُهُۥ حَثِيثًا وَٱلشَّمۡسَ وَٱلۡقَمَرَ وَٱلنُّجُومَ مُسَخَّرَٰتٍۢ بِأَمۡرِهِۦٓۗ أَلَا لَهُ ٱلۡخَلۡقُ وَٱلۡأَمۡرُۗ تَبَارَكَ ٱللَّهُ رَبُّ ٱلۡعَٰلَمِينَ
Indeed your Lord is Allâh, Who created the heavens and the earth in Six Days, and then He rose over (Istawâ) the Throne (really in a manner that suits His Majesty). He brings the night as a cover over the day, seeking it rapidly, and (He created) the sun, the moon, the stars subjected to His Command. Surely, His is the Creation and Commandment. Blessed is Allâh, the Lord of the ‘Âlamîn (mankind, jinn and all that exists).
@Turkish Salafi yeah..that's why i say only one,
Regarding about other attributes of Allah? I still do not know that guy's specific view on it.
These ahlul bid'ah is oddly stubborn..
@@MuhammadAli-mz4pq assalamualaikum brother thank you for sharing this...I hope this will help my muslim friend to get out of thinking that sufi and ashari is the sunnah. I fear he be among the lover of story teller instead of those who calling other to Allah truthfully.
@@hakimibnasri3224 May Allah guide him to the straight path.
what is your views about:
Al-kulabiyyah
Al-Karamiyyah
Al-Mu'tazilah
Al-Jahmiyyah
Al-Jabriyyah
Al-Qadiriyyah
Watch the Aqeedah Playlist.
please help, Im worried and sleepless when I met one guy who embraced / reverted to Islam but his words are weird to me - he stated that 1. Aqeedah & Tawhid is not found in Quran & sunnah. no. 2 we can make another Kaaba and practice circumambulating on it because we also make practicing how to pray. no. 3 wahabbi time lots has been killed and oppressed during his era no. 4 he supports Ibn Hajar Al Asqalani and maulana ilyas, he support Ashairah, sufi and tablighi jamaat. no. 5 he mentioned that Saudi Arabia is not following the 4 respected Islamic scholars (Hanafi, Maliki, Shafi'i and Hanbali). no. 6 if tawheed is oneness, why tawheed becomes 3 like trinity in chistianity (uluhiya, rububiyah, asama) what shall we do with this man?
My advice would be learn more about islam that revert is full of misconceptions. But there is an answer to all of that and that happens to recent reverts they tend to ask too much especially after learning from deviant scholars. Read (kitab al tawhid by Mohammed ibn abd al wahab. And the 3 principles.) get more knowledge. So you become more firm in the belief.
Because that revert may allah guide him is full of misconceptions.
Go back to the scholars of the salaf. May allah help you.
These Ahl sunnah wal jama'ah guys have great skills in magnifying the minutiae of our Deen and trivializing the important aspects. Forget focusing on the despots and kleptocrats that rule many Muslim countries, forget the fact that children in Gaza don't have access to clean water and are dying because of it, forget that families in Afghanistan are dying of thirst and hunger, let's totally ignore the rape and killing of Muslims in China... Lets focus on whether or not people are keeping their pants above their ankles, growing out their beards, and whether they believe Allah to be exactly as we think.
So woe to those who pray, but are heedlless of their prayers. Those who are all show and withhold common kindness. --Al Ma'un
What is more important than aqeedah?
@@muxishine Aqeedah is our creed, the foundation of what we believe. The prophet related it to us simply in the hadith of Jibraeel.
I feel grape🍇😅
يا اشعرية هل شعرتم أنني ... رمد العيون وحكة الأجفان
أنا في كبود الأشعرية قرحة ... أربو فأقتل كل من يشناني
translation please
Assalamualaikum akhi, I hope you would address Bro Hajji, he's been talking non stop about MIAW as Khawarij in the early Najd.
He has addressed him in various Q/A sessions of his classes because he said that he only wants attention to seek fame through this
If you want an excellent biography on MIAW, I'd recommend 'Biography and Mission of Muhammad Ibn AbdulWahabb' by Shaykh Jalal Abualrub. It's and excellent biography that completely refutes all the lies and slander against the great Imam with vast amount of historical references and footnotes.
@@SuperShend and here's it's video summary podcast with Abu Mussab Wajdi Akkari :ua-cam.com/video/lxpYYGbpuTA/v-deo.html
Your translation of the aya is a ta'wil
This is a bida akhi.
What do you say about this aya?
﴾كُلُّ شَيْءٍ هَالِكٌ إِلَّا وَجْهَهُ ۚ ﴿٨٨
Watch the Aqeedah playlist and you shall find the easy answer.
@@OneWayToParadise Thank you, I watched the video in your playlist. at minute 18:00 you mentioned that you only take the apparent meaning. However, at minute 57:00, regarding the aya that I mentioned, you mentioned an interpretation of what the apparent meaning is. How is this not a ta'wil? that apparent meaning is Wahj, however you went further to explain what wajh could mean and could not mean. this is clearly an interpretation that of which the salaf did not do.
Additionally, after you answer the above question... I would like to hear your explanation (or if you have another video you can refer me to) as to why translation is not an interpretation in and of itself. The salaf did not translate ayat, and therefore translating using english or even the modern arabic is an interpretation that is a bida'.
No answer? The salaf would never make such large claims and not defend them
Who cares brother, just u do ur thing and be more strong and spread ur knowledge with us! May Allah bless you
Let's feel grape 🍇
5:33
“The prophet never bothered to explain..”
Maybe the prophet did but those ahadeeth were not transmitted to us
So Allaah doesn't know how to manage preserving His religion?
@@OneWayToParadise But allah never said he will preserve Hadith Allah only says he will preserve the Qur’an
At any rate most of scholars of Islam were Ashari and all of our isnaads for the books of the salaf, Hadith and teaching all have ashariyah in them so are u going to be consistent and remove yourself from every one of these fields of knowledge
@@maalikserebryakov No they don’t, which Ashari is in Musnad Ahmad? Don’t think Abu Hassan was even born yet. And no, the majority of scholars aren’t and weren’t Ashari, this is a bogus claim made by Subki which got spread.
@@maalikserebryakov Do these scholars look Ashari to you from the time of the Salaf. "Whoever claims that you (Allah) do not speak, nor can You be seen in the hereafter, then he has disbelieved in You and does not know You. I testify that you are above your throne, above the seven heavens, not as your enemies the heretical apostate say".
(Muhammad Bin Mussab Al-Abid 228 A.H)
"Whoever claims that Allah is here (on this earth) is a filthy Jahmi. Verily Allah is above the throne and His knowledge encompass everything in the earth and the Heavens".
(Abdul Al-Warrraq 250 A.H)
"Verily Allah is above the throne, separate from his creation. His knowledge encompass everything. No one differs from this except for a Jahmi who mixes Allah with His creation".
(Yahya bin Muadh Ar-Razi 258 A.H)
"They have said worse than the Jews and the Christians. Indeed the Jews, Christians and the people of religion have agreed with the Muslims that Allah is above his throne. And they (Jahmiyyah) say that there is nothing over the throne".
(Saeed bin Ammir Ad-Duba'i 208 A.H)
"Beware of the opinions of the Jahm, for indeed they try and say that Allah is not above the heavens. This is nothing but inspirations from the Shaytaan, it is nothing but disbelief".
(Wahb bin Jarir 206 A.H)
"It was said to Jahm, describe for us your Rabb that you worship. He (Jahm) entered his house and didn't leave. Than after a few days he came out to them and said, He is the air with everything, and he is in everything, and nothing is hidden from him. Abu Muadh said, the enemy of Allah has lied. Indeed Allah is above his throne the way he describe himself".
(Abu Muadh Khalid bin Suleiman Al-Balkhi 199 A.H)
"Indeed the Jahmiyyah want to negate that Allah spoke to Musa (May Allah be pleased with him), and that Allah is a above his throne. I believed they should be asked to repent, they either repent or they are beheaded".
(Abdur Rahman bin Mahdi 197 A.H)
"The beginning of the speech of the Jahmiyyah is honey, and the end of it is poison. Indeed they are trying to say that there is no Illah above the heavens".
(Jabir bin Abdul Hameed Ad-Dabbi 188 A.H)
Abu Mutee al-Balkhi said, "I asked Abu Haneefah about the one who say, I do not know if my Rabb is above the heavens or on the earth. He said, he has certainly disbelieved because Allah said,
Ta Ha 20:5
ٱلرَّحْمَٰنُ عَلَى ٱلْعَرْشِ ٱسْتَوَىٰ
The Most Gracious (Allâh) rose over (Istawâ) the (Mighty) Throne (in a manner that suits His).
I said, if he then say, I do say he rose over his throne but I do not whether his throne is above the heavens or in the earth, He said, if he denies that Allah Allah is above the heavens then he has disbelieved".
Abdullah Ibn Mubarak said, "We do not believe this statement like the Jahmiyyah, who says Allah is on the earth, whoever he is above his throne, just as he described himself".
He further said to a Jahmi, Is your stomach empty from him (Allah), and he was shocked (and could not answer).
Imam Al-Bukhari said Quran is the Kalam of Allah (in the mushaf as well its recitation), and he presented this ayat.
Al-A'raf 7:54
إِنَّ رَبَّكُمُ ٱللَّهُ ٱلَّذِى خَلَقَ ٱلسَّمَٰوَٰتِ وَٱلۡأَرۡضَ فِى سِتَّةِ أَيَّامٍ ثُمَّ ٱسۡتَوَىٰ عَلَى ٱلۡعَرۡشِ يُغۡشِى ٱلَّيۡلَ ٱلنَّهَارَ يَطۡلُبُهُۥ حَثِيثًا وَٱلشَّمۡسَ وَٱلۡقَمَرَ وَٱلنُّجُومَ مُسَخَّرَٰتٍۢ بِأَمۡرِهِۦٓۗ أَلَا لَهُ ٱلۡخَلۡقُ وَٱلۡأَمۡرُۗ تَبَارَكَ ٱللَّهُ رَبُّ ٱلۡعَٰلَمِينَ
Indeed your Lord is Allâh, Who created the heavens and the earth in Six Days, and then He rose over (Istawâ) the Throne (really in a manner that suits His Majesty). He brings the night as a cover over the day, seeking it rapidly, and (He created) the sun, the moon, the stars subjected to His Command. Surely, His is the Creation and Commandment. Blessed is Allâh, the Lord of the ‘Âlamîn (mankind, jinn and all that exists).
@@maalikserebryakov Imam Abu Hassan Al-Ashari was not himself an Ashari. Funny thing. Most Ashari today just turns a blind eye to his Ibanna or when he affirms the Athari Aqeedah, that say Nah.
Ustadh which is better: praying in masjid where they worship graves or an mu'tazili masjid?
Difficult question. One believes Allah to be everywhere the other believe Allah to be nowhere.
They are both on Kufr, I really think one could pray by themself or have to repeat the prayer... ut you should really ask a person of knowledge.
Bro are you claiming those who use the contingency argument are asharis?
Idk bro but I don’t think if you use logical or philosophical arguments that you are Ashari. It’s if you base your entire faith on logic & philosophy first then use it as your measuring stick of the Quran and Sunnah.
And the wrong beliefs they hold about Allah’s attributes. That’s what makes you Ashari.
If you just use contingency or Kalam arguments as a thought experiment idk if there is anything wrong with that. So I hope someone can answer that question for me too.
What is wrong with you? Do you think new muslims or any muslims are gonna be asked about whether Allah had two eyes, two hands, onw foot, fingers etc?
It's not important and to get obsessed with these so called attributes is a disease. Concentrate on the clear beautiful names mentioned hundreds of times instead or the benefit in the hadith.... Like when Allah descends to the last 3rd of tue night .... Its n9t tye descending that is important, its the fact Allah is informing his slaves to worship him while other people sleep.... He is listening and getting closer to his slaves.
Only sick people are beimg obsessed about these things which are of no benefit and not important
And who may you be to make such an outrageous statement? You know how many books have been authored on this topic by hundreds of heavy-weight scholars of this Ummah? Are we supposed to assume they are all sick since "you" an absolute nothing but a UA-cam commenter felt otherwise!! Turn off you internet and go to a cave now!
@@OneWayToParadise so you follow all giants of islam when it suits.
Ibn hajar and nawawi? Bayhaqi?
The ahlul hadith are not companions
They don't make something right or wrong. The Companions never got in to these issues, follow them
I follow the companions. That's the whole point.
@@OneWayToParadise no, you follow later fabrications lile lalikaees book, which says companions discussed khalq al quran.... Please use your mind
Even the salafi publishes know those narrations are lies.... None of these points are important, even moreso in our age.
Aqidah should be simple
@@stadiamak692 These two quotations from the Salaf, which should clarify this issue to you.
‘Imam Uthman ibn Sa‘eed ad-Daarimi (d. 280 - may Allah have mercy upon him) said:
Praise be to Allah, may He be exalted, we know about the concept of metaphors from the language of the Arabs, which you have taken and used to confuse and mislead the ignorant. By means of this concept you denied the reality of the divine attributes, on the basis of the metaphor argument. But we say: It is wrong to judge the most common style in the Arabic language on the basis of its rarest style; rather we should understand the statements of the Arabs on the basis of the most common style, unless you can produce proof that what is meant here is the rarer style (namely metaphor). This is the approach that is most fair, and it is not right to approach the divine attributes that are well known and understood as they appear to be by people of common sense, and twist the meaning on the grounds that these are metaphors. Source: “Naqd Ad-Darimi ‘Ala Bishr al-Mireesi” of Al-Darimi 2/855
He said:
"And we also Takfir them because of what is known from their Kufr by everybody: that they don't acknowledge that Allah Exalted is He has a Face or that He can Hear and See and Speak or that He has Knowledge or any other attribute except when they give an erroneous interpretation (i.e that Allah spoke without sound and other things audhu billah)." Source: “Al-Radd ala Al-Jahmiyyah” of Al-Darimi p199 nr367
Imam Hammad bin Zayd (d. 179H) said:
The similitude of the Jahmiyyah is like a man when it is said to him: 'is there a palm tree in your home?’ and he says, 'yes', and it is said to him: 'does it have palm leaves?’ and he says, 'no'. And it is said to him: 'does it have palm branches?’ and he says, 'no', and it is said to him: 'does it have trunks?’ and he says, 'no'. And it is said to him: 'does it have a stem'? And he says, 'no', and it is said to him: 'does it have a root?’ and he says, 'no'. It is then said to him: 'there is no palm tree in your home'. It is (similarly) said to those Jahmiyyah: 'do you have a Lord?’ they will say, 'yes', and it is said to them: 'does He Speak?’ and they say: 'no'. And it is said to them: 'does He have a Hand?’ and they say, 'no', and it is said to them: ‘does He have a Foot?’ and they say, 'no'. And it is said to them: 'does He have a Finger?’ and they say, 'no', and it is said to them: 'does He get Pleased & Angry?’ and they say, 'no'. It is then said to them: 'you have no Lord'. - Sharh Madhahib Ahlul Sunnah of Ibn Shaheen (nr. 32)
3:05 the number should be 112:4 not 42:11 Jazakallah
Atharis say this is rejecting the Quran and the Sunnah. Asharis say this is Tashbih. Can we all just get along? Please?
The Salaf were quite hard on those who did said that Allah is not above his throne. So it is difficult and complicated Akhi.
Like For example.
"Whoever claims that you (Allah) do not speak, nor can You be seen in the hereafter, then he has disbelieved in You and does not know You. I testify that you are above your throne, above the seven heavens, not as your enemies the heretical apostate say".
(Muhammad Bin Mussab Al-Abid 228 A.H)
"Whoever claims that Allah is here (on this earth) is a filthy Jahmi. Verily Allah is above the throne and His knowledge encompass everything in the earth and the Heavens".
(Abdul Al-Warrraq 250 A.H)
"Verily Allah is above the throne, separate from his creation. His knowledge encompass everything. No one differs from this except for a Jahmi who mixes Allah with His creation".
(Yahya bin Muadh Ar-Razi 258 A.H)
"They have said worse than the Jews and the Christians. Indeed the Jews, Christians and the people of religion have agreed with the Muslims that Allah is above his throne. And they (Jahmiyyah) say that there is nothing over the throne".
(Saeed bin Ammir Ad-Duba'i 208 A.H)
"Beware of the opinions of the Jahm, for indeed they try and say that Allah is not above the heavens. This is nothing but inspirations from the Shaytaan, it is nothing but disbelief".
(Wahb bin Jarir 206 A.H)
"It was said to Jahm, describe for us your Rabb that you worship. He (Jahm) entered his house and didn't leave. Than after a few days he came out to them and said, He is the air with everything, and he is in everything, and nothing is hidden from him. Abu Muadh said, the enemy of Allah has lied. Indeed Allah is above his throne the way he describe himself".
(Abu Muadh Khalid bin Suleiman Al-Balkhi 199 A.H)
"Indeed the Jahmiyyah want to negate that Allah spoke to Musa (May Allah be pleased with him), and that Allah is a above his throne. I believed they should be asked to repent, they either repent or they are beheaded".
(Abdur Rahman bin Mahdi 197 A.H)
"The beginning of the speech of the Jahmiyyah is honey, and the end of it is poison. Indeed they are trying to say that there is no Illah above the heavens".
(Jabir bin Abdul Hameed Ad-Dabbi 188 A.H)
Abu Mutee al-Balkhi said, "I asked Abu Haneefah about the one who say, I do not know if my Rabb is above the heavens or on the earth. He said, he has certainly disbelieved because Allah said,
Ta Ha 20:5
ٱلرَّحْمَٰنُ عَلَى ٱلْعَرْشِ ٱسْتَوَىٰ
The Most Gracious (Allâh) rose over (Istawâ) the (Mighty) Throne (in a manner that suits His).
I said, if he then say, I do say he rose over his throne but I do not whether his throne is above the heavens or in the earth, He said, if he denies that Allah Allah is above the heavens then he has disbelieved".
Abdullah Ibn Mubarak said, "We do not believe this statement like the Jahmiyyah, who says Allah is on the earth, whoever he is above his throne, just as he described himself".
He further said to a Jahmi, Is your stomach empty from him (Allah), and he was shocked (and could not answer).
Imam Al-Bukhari said Quran is the Kalam of Allah (in the mushaf as well its recitation), and he presented this ayat.
Al-A'raf 7:54
إِنَّ رَبَّكُمُ ٱللَّهُ ٱلَّذِى خَلَقَ ٱلسَّمَٰوَٰتِ وَٱلۡأَرۡضَ فِى سِتَّةِ أَيَّامٍ ثُمَّ ٱسۡتَوَىٰ عَلَى ٱلۡعَرۡشِ يُغۡشِى ٱلَّيۡلَ ٱلنَّهَارَ يَطۡلُبُهُۥ حَثِيثًا وَٱلشَّمۡسَ وَٱلۡقَمَرَ وَٱلنُّجُومَ مُسَخَّرَٰتٍۢ بِأَمۡرِهِۦٓۗ أَلَا لَهُ ٱلۡخَلۡقُ وَٱلۡأَمۡرُۗ تَبَارَكَ ٱللَّهُ رَبُّ ٱلۡعَٰلَمِينَ
Indeed your Lord is Allâh, Who created the heavens and the earth in Six Days, and then He rose over (Istawâ) the Throne (really in a manner that suits His Majesty). He brings the night as a cover over the day, seeking it rapidly, and (He created) the sun, the moon, the stars subjected to His Command. Surely, His is the Creation and Commandment. Blessed is Allâh, the Lord of the ‘Âlamîn (mankind, jinn and all that exists).
Nu`aym bin Hammad Al-Khuza'i, the teacher of Imam Al-Bukhari, who said, *"Whoever likens Allah with His creation, will have committed Kufr. Whoever denies what Allah has described Himself with, will have committed Kufr.*
Why would Asharis Assume Affirming Allah's Siffat is Tashbih, they are following the pagans in Quran 53 :19 in saying Allah's Siffat are idol parts.
We don't need kalam, or its greek baggage, we have Qiyas Islam for logic.
We don't need Sufi batini baggage, we've Sunni Zhud & Dawa for tazkiya!
Ashari Kalam bida on Allah's Siffat divides, shirk in Quran 7:32, opens dream prophecy sufi misuse, grave worship & colonies. Tawhid ties to safety in Nur 55.
Oh Khulab Asharis. To deny Allah is over His arsh is way of firaun (Quran 40 :37)
To say Allah's Siffat (Qabr or others) are parts is pagan Qaraish (Quran 53 :19)
To deny Allah's speech can be heard is of idolaters of Ibrahim. (Quran 21 :65)
To say Allah doesn't change rejects Allah's will & hadith intercession (Muslim, Kitab Iman).
---
Qur'an 2 : 25 - ... Every time they will be provided with a fruit therefrom, they will say: "This is what we were provided with before," and they shall have therein Azwajun Mutahharatun (purified mates) and they will abide therein forever.
Tafsir Ibn Kathir : Ibn `Abbas said, "Nothing in Paradise resembles anything in the life of this world, except in name.''
Quran 16 : 60 - For those who believe not in the Hereafter is an evil description, and for Allah is the highest description. And He is the All-Mighty, the All-Wise.
[Allah's description is highest above tashbih, & tied to Akira (Ruya?), see Quran 75 :22)]
---
lmaam Ahmad (d. 241] said, “These ahaadeeth should he left as they are ... *‘We affirm them and we do not make any similitude for them. This is what has been agreed upon by the scholars.”* - 136 Reported by Ibn al-Jawzee in Manaaqib lmaam Ahmad, pp. 155-156.
Imaam at-Tirmidhee (d. 279H) said, “It has been stated by more than one person from the People of Knowledge about such ahaadeeth, that *there is no tashbeeh (resemblance) to the Attributes of Allaah, and our Lord, the Blessed and Most High, descends to the lowest heaven every night. So they say, ‘Affirm these narrations, have eernaan (faith) in them, do not deny them, nor ask how.’*
However, the Jahmiyyah oppose these narrations and say, ‘This is tashbeeh!’ However, Allaah the Most High, has mentioned in various places in His Book, the Attribute of al-Yad (Hand), as-Sam’ (Hearing), and al-Basr (Seeing), but the Jahmiyyah make ta’weel of these aayaat, explaining them in a way other than how they are explained by the People of Knowledge. They (the Jahmiyyah) say, ‘Indeed, Allaah did not create Aadam with His own Hand,’ they say that Hand means the Power of Allaah.” 138 - Sunan at-Tirmidhee, 3/24
Abul-Hasan al-Ash’aree (d. 324H) said, “If it is said, ‘Why do you deny that His saying: “Do they not see that We have created for them what Our Own Hands have created.”
And His saying:
“Whom I have created with My Own (Two) Hands.” 165 are rnajaaz (metaphorical)?’
To him it is said, *‘The ruling concerning the Speech of Allah, the Mighty and Majestic, is that it is taken upon its dhaahir (apparent) and haqeeqah (real) meaning. Nothing is removed from its dhaahir (apparent) meaning to majaaz (a metaphorical) one, except with a proof ...*
Likewise, the saying of Allaah, the Mighty and Majestic:
His saying: “Whom I have created with My Own (Two) Hands.” 167
*It is obligatory to affirm two Hands for Allaah, the Most High, in its haqeeqah (real) meaning, not with the meaning of ni’matayn* (two bounties of Allaah).”
- Al-Ibaanah ‘an Usoolid-Diyaanah, p. 133.
The ascription of this book to Abul-Hasan al-Ash’aree, and that it was his ‘final book concerning‘aqeedah, has been testified to by a number of Scholars, from them, al- Haafidh Ibn ‘Asaakir in Tabyeenul - Kadhabul - Muftaree, p. 152, al- Bayhaqee in Al-I’tiqaad, p. 31, Imaam adh-Dhahabee in Al-Uluww,
@@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543
SubhanAllah Wahhabis worship 2 hands a face 2 shins, a piece of clothing, and a side (definitely not idol worship)
Mujassima are like those gays who act gay and then say no homo.
assalaamu 'alaikum.
not muss'ab. my guess
Wa 'alaykumus-salaam wa rahmatullaahi wa barakaatuh
thats straight up anthromorphism brooo... the fudge?
That straight up being a Jahmi brooo.
I will mention you two quotations from the Salaf, which should clarify this issue to you.
‘Imam Uthman ibn Sa‘eed ad-Darimi (d. 280 - may Allah have mercy upon him) said:
Praise be to Allah, may He be exalted, we know about the concept of metaphors from the language of the Arabs, which you have taken and used to confuse and mislead the ignorant. By means of this
concept you denied the reality of the divine attributes, on the basis of the metaphor argument. But we say: It is wrong to judge the most common style in the Arabic language on the basis of its rarest style; rather we should understand the statements of the Arabs on the basis of the most common style, unless you can produce proof that what is meant here is the rarer style (namely metaphor). This is the approach that is most fair, and it is not right to approach the divine attributes that are well known and understood as they appear to be by people of common sense, and twist the meaning on the grounds that these are metaphors. Source: “Naqd Ad-Darimi ‘Ala Bishr al-Mireesi” of Al-Darimi 2/855
He said:
"And we also Takfir them because of what is known from their Kufr by everybody: that they don't acknowledge that Allah Exalted is He has a Face or that He can Hear and See and Speak or that He has Knowledge or any other attribute except when they give an erroneous interpretation (i.e that Allah spoke without sound and other things audhu billah)." Source: “Al-Radd ala Al-Jahmiyyah” of Al-Darimi p199 nr367
Imam Hammad bin Zayd (d. 179H) said:
The similitude of the Jahmiyyah is like a man when it is said to him: 'is there a palm tree in your home?’ and he says, 'yes', and it is said to him: 'does it have palm leaves?’ and he says, 'no'. And it is said to him: 'does it have palm branches?’ and he says, 'no', and it is said to him: 'does it have trunks?’ and he says, 'no'. And it is said to him: 'does it have a stem'? And he says, 'no', and it is said to him: 'does it have a root?’ and he says, 'no'. It is then said to him: 'there is no palm tree in your home'. It is (similarly) said to those Jahmiyyah: 'do you have a Lord?’ they will say, 'yes', and it is said to them: 'does He Speak?’ and they say: 'no'. And it is said to them: 'does He have a Hand?’ and they say, 'no', and it is said to them: ‘does He have a Foot?’ and they say, 'no'. And it is said to them: 'does He have a Finger?’ and they say, 'no', and it is said to them: 'does He get Pleased & Angry?’ and they say, 'no'. It is then said to them: 'you have no Lord'. - Sharh Madhahib Ahlul Sunnah of Ibn Shaheen (nr. 32)
6:37 it sounds like someone we indians are very familiar with lol
I lost a few brain cells watching this nonsense.
So now you are left with none.
@@OneWayToParadise a typical literalist response
@Pensive Soul Maybe you had a weak nafs to begin with. I am not a fan of philosophy nor am I averse to the simplicity of the truth but having said that I think it is important to engage atheists and others using philosophy.
@Pensive Soul I think I and you have a very different understanding of philosophy so lets agree to disagree :)
@Pensive Soul Be content brother, because Someone asked him (i.e., Imam Abu Hanifa), "What is your opinion, about that which he has innovated for the people with regards to Kalam about accidents and bodies?” He said, "Principles of philosophy!!! Stick to the way of the Salaf, for every novelty is a Bidah (innovation in the religion).”
Manaqib Abi Haneefah of al-Kurdi
The "Shake of the Shakes" and clown 🤡 animations were hilarious 😂
On a serious note, I never had doubts about Allah(swt) having hands or shin or any other "supposedly" humanly body part if it's mentioned in the Quraan and Sunnah. The real problem is, when we as humans think of these terms, the immediate notion or image of that body part comes to our head and we immediately start to wrestle with our mind. However, if you know that Allah(swt) is beyond whatever we can imagine, all these imaginary bodily notions inside our head go down the drain. The moment one has this type of bodily notions in your mind, ask yourself, "Did anyone say it's like a human hand or shin or whatever bodily part you can think of?"
The problem lies in the heart and mind Akhi, it is the heart were this doubt exist, the rest Sifdat game that the Ashariyyah play is just camouflage.
Quran 42;11- - There is nothing like, similar, alike, comparable to Allah.
Quran 16:74- Don't invent, try to find likeness, similitude, comparison, resemblancefor Allah.
The end of debate.
"Chickity chick cheese 🐔 French fried" sounds delish, especially deep fried in 🥥 oil. 😅😅😅🤦🤦🤦
Were ibn hajar and al nawawi shady?
In this regard, they were off for sure.
Why is metaphor so difficult to accept? Not to take things literally is chaos?
Because you’re not affirming what Allah told explicitly and you didn’t accept the apparent meaning.
It is He who has sent down to you, [O Muḥammad], the Book; in it are verses [that are] precise - they are the foundation of the Book - and others unspecific. As for those in whose hearts is deviation [from truth], they will follow that of it which is unspecific, seeking discord and seeking an interpretation [suitable to them]. And no one knows its [true] interpretation except Allāh. But those firm in knowledge say, "We believe in it. All [of it] is from our Lord." And no one will be reminded except those of understanding. (3:7)
@@FufuZ I find seating on the throne as a metaphor
@@cmsacademy1673 did the prophet Sallallaahu Alayhi wasallam or the companions think the same?
@@FufuZ I think they did as it was simple understanding of language.
@@cmsacademy1673 I think there is a need to rebuke your Jahmi tendencies.
I will mention you two quotations from the Salaf, which should clarify this issue to you.
‘Imam Uthman ibn Sa‘eed ad-Darimi (d. 280 - may Allah have mercy upon him) said:
Praise be to Allah, may He be exalted, we know about the concept of metaphors from the language of the Arabs, which you have taken and used to confuse and mislead the ignorant. By means of this
concept you denied the reality of the divine attributes, on the basis of the metaphor argument. But we say: It is wrong to judge the most common style in the Arabic language on the basis of its rarest style; rather we should understand the statements of the Arabs on the basis of the most common style, unless you can produce proof that what is meant here is the rarer style (namely metaphor). This is the approach that is most fair, and it is not right to approach the divine attributes that are well known and understood as they appear to be by people of common sense, and twist the meaning on the grounds that these are metaphors. Source: “Naqd Ad-Darimi ‘Ala Bishr al-Mireesi” of Al-Darimi 2/855
He said:
"And we also Takfir them because of what is known from their Kufr by everybody: that they don't acknowledge that Allah Exalted is He has a Face or that He can Hear and See and Speak or that He has Knowledge or any other attribute except when they give an erroneous interpretation (i.e that Allah spoke without sound and other things audhu billah)." Source: “Al-Radd ala Al-Jahmiyyah” of Al-Darimi p199 nr367
Imam Hammad bin Zayd (d. 179H) said:
The similitude of the Jahmiyyah is like a man when it is said to him: 'is there a palm tree in your home?’ and he says, 'yes', and it is said to him: 'does it have palm leaves?’ and he says, 'no'. And it is said to him: 'does it have palm branches?’ and he says, 'no', and it is said to him: 'does it have trunks?’ and he says, 'no'. And it is said to him: 'does it have a stem'? And he says, 'no', and it is said to him: 'does it have a root?’ and he says, 'no'. It is then said to him: 'there is no palm tree in your home'. It is (similarly) said to those Jahmiyyah: 'do you have a Lord?’ they will say, 'yes', and it is said to them: 'does He Speak?’ and they say: 'no'. And it is said to them: 'does He have a Hand?’ and they say, 'no', and it is said to them: ‘does He have a Foot?’ and they say, 'no'. And it is said to them: 'does He have a Finger?’ and they say, 'no', and it is said to them: 'does He get Pleased & Angry?’ and they say, 'no'. It is then said to them: 'you have no Lord'. - Sharh Madhahib Ahlul Sunnah of Ibn Shaheen (nr. 32)
So you are wahhabi
No we are Muhammadi, Abu Bakri, Umari, Salafi!
And Allah's exclusive name is Al Wahab you junkie, the imam's name was Muhammad and his dad's name was ibn Abdul Wahab, the imam says his opponents don't know Tawhid and they prove the point saying Wahabi.
@@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543 technically, sunnis, ahlul hadeeth, ahlus sunnah, ahlus sunnah wal jama3ah, salafis, wahhabis, etc… are all same right?
Hadn't you figured that out until now?
@@FufuZ Yes, Prophet Muhammad peace & blessings be on him & Sahabas taught pray to Allah only & follow sunna, shia & extreme sufis like pagans pray to imams and reject practice of sunna, as hadith predict they copy yeahood & nasara to the ummah.
Laa habibi, no clowns. All clowns are bad.
If you feel great promoting the pagan beliefs about Allah, then congratulations! But please don’t say that it’s the belief of the Sahabah, because it’s a lie. You mistook the era, it’s a bit before the sahabah: the time when people thought of their gods as beings with human characteristics.
You prove the belief of the Sahaaba with textual evidence. We're waiting.
The wait is still not over?
Frying a chicken but that chicken has no mithl 😂
Take the Middle course!
Nu`aym bin Hammad Al-Khuza'i, the teacher of Imam Al-Bukhari, who said, *"Whoever likens Allah with His creation, will have committed Kufr. Whoever denies what Allah has described Himself with, will have committed Kufr.*
sufi asharis are like half shia mutazili, one deny sahaba who compile Quran, other deny Aqida of 4 Mathhab & 6 Hadith imams who compile fiqh & hadith, yet claim Islam or sunna & enjoin ext. taqlid of Quran 9 :31, not Quran 21 :7 to learn dalil like Quran 12 :108 & divide umma & persons from revelation. See quotes of the 4 mathhab imams, a good compilation was made by Sh. Albani.
Keep in mind the quotes of the preistly sufis who say be like a corpse and not asking questions... maybe that is why deviant Yasir Qadhi though yajuj and majuj were zombies... they hought they were sufis or from the book of mathew. Asharis error on Sifat mixed with sufi error on hadith of dreams in a preistly bida manner compiled over time to their seularism. the kitabis of the umma, or recal the hadith some will follow the greeks and majewsis!
---
They have no dalil to differ one Siffat of Allah for another or aka Siffat Qabr, they interpret like pagans interpret Allah's Siffat as parts or physical idols.
Quran 53 : 19. Have you then considered Al-Lat, and Al-'Uzza
, Tafsir ibn Kathir - Ibn Jarir said: They derive name for their idol Al-`Uzza from Allah's name Al-`Aziz.
Ashari errors on Tawhid Siffat are of old pagans. Quran 2 :143 - we are the middle nation, in running from idolatry, asharis fell in. Allah not speaking is of idolators of Ibrahim (Quran 21 :65), to say Allah isn't over His Arsh is of Firaun/atheism (Quran 40 :37), to say Allah doesn't change denies hadith of intercession, Allah is angriest on Qiyama (Sahih Muslim, Kitab Iman). The Salafis when they say Ashari imply Tashbih to deny the Siffat is clear from their pattern of error matching the pagans of old who affirmed it in a way they do. Allah's highness doesn't limit Him in Quran 4.126 as explained by imam Tahawi in Aqidah tahawiyah.
Quran 16 : 60. For those who believe not in the Hereafter is an evil description, and for Allah is the highest description. And He is the All-Mighty, the All-Wise.
- Ties Allah's Siffat's high description, clearly above tashbih to the hereafter, like Seeing Allah in Quran 75 :23, refutes Jahmiya who error on Allah's Siffat who Asharis follow, who maybe deprived of seeing Allah as a penalty!
---
Other errors, we don't need greek kalam baggage but Islamic qiyas for logic. True Aql conforms with the Naql as Ibn Taymiyyah teaches.
We don't need Batini sufi preist baggage zhud (Quran 58) but Sunni Zhud for dicipline!
Ahad hadith are taken in creed as Sh. Albani wrote in his book with that name, even Ibn Hajr and Nawawi were salafi in hadith science in this affair!
Many of their imams, Imam Ashari himself repented as did Juwaini i think and ghazali but didn't know what to repent to due to the post salaf mihnah situation of the day.
Sunni scholarship is Athari.
Micropooohne, labtob,…
Okay this time, your wife edited this video right?
Let's not mention about his (or anyone's) wife.
@@xenomorphisisdilage472 my dear brother. He himself told us in a live stream to guess if his wife edited the video, or his son when he posts videos.
@@hooman467 he mustn’t discuss anything related to his wife
@@Fadedfrost1 please provide me with a good reason. Not ur reasoning. Actuall dalil (Quran, sunnah). JazakAllah khair
@@Fadedfrost1 he can if he want to, it’s halal. He isn’t showing his wife off he’s just giving her credit
//allah has two eyes//
So is Allah a hot blondie with pearly blue eyes? Or does Allah prefer brown eyes? Or maybe Allah has divine magical contact lens that allow Him to change eye color? And which gender is Allah? male? female? or maybe trans?
how many fingers on each hand? 3? 5? 10? or does Allah have octopus tentacles?
//chickety-chick cheese//
So does Allah prefer mcdonalds or kentucky? And do the Angels deliver Allah regular supplies of his favorite foods? And where does Allah p*op? or maybe everytime Allah p*ops He creates a blackhole? And which flavor camelp*ss does Allah consume with his fries?
Enough blasphemy or do you want more?
maybe the reality is Allah and Iblis have hots*x every tuesday to celebrate abu lahab not being tortured so intensely. iblis then gives birth to another human soul. Allah becomes jealous of iblis being the mother of humankind with paradise under her feet, and subsequently declares iblis the enemy of humankind since Allah doesn;t want humankind honoring iblis to which iblis reacts strongly
we can have so much fun with this mr ahlus sunnah wa'al jamah
If you only knew who wrong what you are saying is and how close you are to Kufr, if you have not fallen into it already. Ya doorbell, even if you do not agree, can you not be smart enough not to make Allaah the subject of your mockery!!?
The amount of errors in this video are too numerous. Let’s just start with one fact, you do not have to be a mutakallim to affirm the tanzih of Allah that the Ahlus Sunnah and the Salaf have affirmed. You can be an Ashari without doing Kalam, but most of you Salafis can’t even define Kalam properly. By your definition of Kalam even Ibn Taymiyyah is a mutakallim since he uses rational arguments to support his creed in Bayan Talbis al Jahmiyyah and for his believe on Hulul al Hawadith of the Quran. If Salafis were to see At Tadmuriyyah by Ibn Taymiyyah, without seeing the authors name, they would call it “Greek philosophy”. This is why Salafiyyah is not taken seriously by the real Ahlus Sunnah, you do not even know our beliefs. Alhamdulillah Allah guided me away from this incoherent and confusing path. May Allah guide us all to Ahlus Sunnah.
The real Joke is you. I will mention you two quotations from the Salaf, which should refute your claim.
‘Imam Uthman ibn Sa‘eed ad-Daarimi (d. 280 - may Allah have mercy upon him) said:
Praise be to Allah, may He be exalted, we know about the concept of metaphors from the language of the Arabs, which you have taken and used to confuse and mislead the ignorant. By means of this concept you denied the reality of the divine attributes, on the basis of the metaphor argument. But we say: It is wrong to judge the most common style in the Arabic language on the basis of its rarest style; rather we should understand the statements of the Arabs on the basis of the most common style, unless you can produce proof that what is meant here is the rarer style (namely metaphor). This is the approach that is most fair, and it is not right to approach the divine attributes that are well known and understood as they appear to be by people of common sense, and twist the meaning on the grounds that these are metaphors. Source: “Naqd Ad-Darimi ‘Ala Bishr al-Mireesi” of Al-Darimi 2/855
He said:
"And we also Takfir them because of what is known from their Kufr by everybody: that they don't acknowledge that Allah Exalted is He has a Face or that He can Hear and See and Speak or that He has Knowledge or any other attribute except when they give an erroneous interpretation (i.e that Allah spoke without sound and other things audhu billah)." Source: “Al-Radd ala Al-Jahmiyyah” of Al-Darimi p199 nr367
Imam Hammad bin Zayd (d. 179H) said:
The similitude of the Jahmiyyah is like a man when it is said to him: 'is there a palm tree in your home?’ and he says, 'yes', and it is said to him: 'does it have palm leaves?’ and he says, 'no'. And it is said to him: 'does it have palm branches?’ and he says, 'no', and it is said to him: 'does it have trunks?’ and he says, 'no'. And it is said to him: 'does it have a stem'? And he says, 'no', and it is said to him: 'does it have a root?’ and he says, 'no'. It is then said to him: 'there is no palm tree in your home'. It is (similarly) said to those Jahmiyyah: 'do you have a Lord?’ they will say, 'yes', and it is said to them: 'does He Speak?’ and they say: 'no'. And it is said to them: 'does He have a Hand?’ and they say, 'no', and it is said to them: ‘does He have a Foot?’ and they say, 'no'. And it is said to them: 'does He have a Finger?’ and they say, 'no', and it is said to them: 'does He get Pleased & Angry?’ and they say, 'no'. It is then said to them: 'you have no Lord'. - Sharh Madhahib Ahlul Sunnah of Ibn Shaheen (nr. 32)
@@MuhammadAli-mz4pq Subhan Allah #May Allah Azza'wajal have mercy upon all the salah (Authentic) Ulaama's AMEEN ALLAHUMMA AAMEEN
“...what are you French frying in your oven”...pretty much sums up the aqeedah of the asharis etc. French frying in an oven lol
Salafi: Meanings are known
Ahlus Sunnah wal Jammah:
قال شيخ الحنابلة الموفق ابن قدامة المقدسي (ت620هـ) :
The Shaikh of the Hanbalis, Muwaffaq ud-Din Ibn Qudamah Al-Maqdisi رحمه الله(d.620), may Allah be pleased with him,:
)وكل ما جاء في القرآن أو صح عن المصطفى عليه السلام من صفات الرحمن وجب الإيمان به، وتلقيه بالتسليم والقبول، وترك التعرض له بالرد والتأويل والتشبيه والتمثيل. وما أشكل من ذلك وجب إثباته لفظا وترك التعرض لمعناه ونرد علمه إلى قائله( {لمعة الاعتقاد ص6}
And all of what came in the Qur’an or is authentically narrated from the Chosen One, peace be upon him, is from the Attributes of the Merciful. It is compulsory to have Iman in it, meet it with submission and acceptance, leaving seeking to refute it, interpret it, liken it or give it semblance. And whatever is ambiguous of that, it is compulsory to establish and affirm the wording and leave seeking the meaning while returning the meaning of it to the One who said it.[26]
وقال :
The Imam also remarked:
( ومذهب السلف رحمة الله عليهم الإيمان بصفات الله تعالى وأسمائه التي وصف بها نفسه في آياته وتنزيله أو على لسان رسوله من غير زيادة عليها ولا نقص منها ولا تجاوز لها ولا تفسير ولا تأويل لها بما يخالف ظاهرها ولا تشبيه بصفات المخلوقين ولا سمات المحدثين بل أمروها كما جاءت وردوا علمها إلى قائلها ومعناها إلى المتكلم بها) {ذم التاويل ص11}
And the way of the First Three Generations, may Allah have mercy upon them, is to have Iman in the Attributes and Names of Allah, Exalted be He, which He has described Himself with in His Ayat or the Revelation in total or on the tongue of His Messenger without addition or subtraction from it. And one does not transgress them, give meaning to them or interpretation that opposes the text, likening them with the attributes of the creation or qualities of ephemeral things; on the contrary, one is to let them pass just as they came, return the knowledge of it to the One that said it and return the meaning of it to the One who spoke it” Dhamm ut-Ta’wil, p.11
imam al-Zarkashi- may Allāh have mercy upon him-sald.
“The people differ regarding what is cited from them [the ambiguous texts] in the verses and Hadith reports, and they are three groups:
1. Those who believe that] there is no room for figurative interpretation of them, rather [they posit], they should be relayed according to their outward meanings and nothing of them should be interpreted. They are the ANTHROPOMORPHISTS .
2. [Those who believe that] the [ambiguous texts] do have an interpretation, however, we are to refrain from that, while at the same time not believing in any resemblance or outright denial. [According to this view] we are to say: (None know its interpretation except Allah.› This is the view of the Salaf.
3. [Those who believe that] they are interpreted. They interpreted them according to what befits Him. The first position is false, and the other two positions are recorded from the Companions, and those who have been reported using figurative interpretation include Ali, Ibn Mas'ud, In 'Abbas, and others.”
[Al Burhān Fi ‘’Ulūm Al Qur’ān 2:207]
Two quotations from the Salaf, which should clarify this issue to you.
‘Imam Uthman ibn Sa‘eed ad-Daarimi (d. 280 - may Allah have mercy upon him) said:
Praise be to Allah, may He be exalted, we know about the concept of metaphors from the language of the Arabs, which you have taken and used to confuse and mislead the ignorant. By means of this concept you denied the reality of the divine attributes, on the basis of the metaphor argument. But we say: It is wrong to judge the most common style in the Arabic language on the basis of its rarest style; rather we should understand the statements of the Arabs on the basis of the most common style, unless you can produce proof that what is meant here is the rarer style (namely metaphor). This is the approach that is most fair, and it is not right to approach the divine attributes that are well known and understood as they appear to be by people of common sense, and twist the meaning on the grounds that these are metaphors. Source: “Naqd Ad-Darimi ‘Ala Bishr al-Mireesi” of Al-Darimi 2/855
He said:
"And we also Takfir them because of what is known from their Kufr by everybody: that they don't acknowledge that Allah Exalted is He has a Face or that He can Hear and See and Speak or that He has Knowledge or any other attribute except when they give an erroneous interpretation (i.e that Allah spoke without sound and other things audhu billah)." Source: “Al-Radd ala Al-Jahmiyyah” of Al-Darimi p199 nr367
Imam Hammad bin Zayd (d. 179H) said:
The similitude of the Jahmiyyah is like a man when it is said to him: 'is there a palm tree in your home?’ and he says, 'yes', and it is said to him: 'does it have palm leaves?’ and he says, 'no'. And it is said to him: 'does it have palm branches?’ and he says, 'no', and it is said to him: 'does it have trunks?’ and he says, 'no'. And it is said to him: 'does it have a stem'? And he says, 'no', and it is said to him: 'does it have a root?’ and he says, 'no'. It is then said to him: 'there is no palm tree in your home'. It is (similarly) said to those Jahmiyyah: 'do you have a Lord?’ they will say, 'yes', and it is said to them: 'does He Speak?’ and they say: 'no'. And it is said to them: 'does He have a Hand?’ and they say, 'no', and it is said to them: ‘does He have a Foot?’ and they say, 'no'. And it is said to them: 'does He have a Finger?’ and they say, 'no', and it is said to them: 'does He get Pleased & Angry?’ and they say, 'no'. It is then said to them: 'you have no Lord'. - Sharh Madhahib Ahlul Sunnah of Ibn Shaheen (nr. 32)
@@MuhammadAli-mz4pq Salafis love to quote but never understand what they quote nor do they look at the commentaries.
@@ReturningRuh What Ahl al-Sunnah wa al-Jama'ah actually say, and how they affirmed the apparent meanings:
_________
Sufyān ibn ʿUyaynah (107-198) said:
"Regarding all (the Attributes) that Allāh described Himself with in His Book, the explanation of its meaning is reciting it and then remaining silent upon it (i.e., its meaning is what is apparent and clear from the text itself)."
[Al-Asmāʾ wa al-Ṣifāt 725]
Al-Ḥāfiẓ ibn Ḥajar al-ʿAsqalānī (773-852) said, "Reported by Al-Bayhaqī (384-458) with a ṣaḥīḥ isnād (authentic chain of transmission)."
[Fatḥ al-Bārī 13/407]
_________
The Imām of Ahl al-Sunnah, Aḥmad ibn Ḥanbal (164-241), said in regards to affirming that Allāh will be seen in the Hereafter:
“Discussing (the howness of how Allāh will be seen) is bidʿah (blameworthy innovation). Rather, we believe in it as it has come, upon its apparent meaning (ʿalā ẓāhirih), and we do not discuss it with anyone.”
[Uṣūl al-Sunnah li Aḥmad ibn Ḥanbal, p. 3]
_________
Imām al-Mufassirīn ibn Jarīr al-Ṭabarī (224-310) said in his book:
When a questioner asks you, “What do you say about the meanings?” Say to him, “The meaning is that which is apparent (ẓāhir) in the report.”
[Kitāb al-Tabṣīr fī Maʿālim al-Dīn, p. 146]
_________
The early Arabic grammarian, Abū Manṣūr al-Azharī (282-370), said:
“What is intended (by 'pass over the aḥādīth as they have come') is to leave them upon their apparent meanings (ʿalā ẓāhirihā) as they have come.”
[Tahdhīb al-Lughah 9/56]
_________
Abū Sulaymān al-Khaṭṭābī (310-378) wrote in his book:
“The methodology of the Salaf in regards to the Āyāt pertaining to the Attributes of Allāh and the aḥādīth (pertaining to them) is to observe them upon their apparent meanings (ijrāʾuhā ʿalā ẓawāhirihā).”
[Kitāb al-Arbaʿīn fī Ṣifāt Rabb al-ʿĀlamīn, p. 93]
_________
Al-Qāḍī Abū Yaʿlā (380-458) said:
"The Ṣaḥābah and those who came after them from the Tābiʿīn observed them (i.e., the Attributes of Allāh) upon their apparent meanings (ʿalā ẓāhirihā), and they did not reject its meaning through taʾwīl, and nor did they divert them from the apparent meaning.”
_________
Al-Khaṭīb al-Baghdādī (392-463) said:
"As for the Attributes of Allāh, and as for what has been narrated regarding them from the authentic aḥādīth, then the methodology of the Salaf is to affirm them and observe them upon their apparent meanings (ʿalā ẓawāhirihā)."
[Mukhtaṣar al-ʿUlū, p. 272]
_________
Imām al-Baghawī (433-516) said about the Attributes of Allāh:
“It is obligatory to believe in them and pass over (i.e., affirm) them upon their apparent meanings (imrāruhā ʿalā ẓāhirihā).”
[Sharḥ al-Sunnah 1/170]
_________
May Allah guide you. Tafwid al-ma'na is not the way of the Salaf.
Al-Ḥāfiẓ ibn ʿAbdil-Barr (368-463) reported:
"Ahl al-Sunnah are all unanimously agreed (majmaʿūn) in affirming all the Attributes of Allāh mentioned in the Qurʾān and Sunnah and believing in them, and taking them upon their literal meanings and not metaphorical ones-however, they do not delve into the nature, (or howness), of any of them. But as for Ahl al-Bidaʿ (people of innovations) and the Jahmiyyah and the Muʿtazilah and the Khawārij, then they all rejected this, and they did not affirm the Attributes upon their apparent meanings. They claimed that whoever affirms these Attributes would be a mushabbih (anthropomorphist)! But the truth is with those who say what is stated in the Book of Allāh and the Sunnah of His Messenger ﷺ, and these are the Imāms of the Jamāʿah, and to Allāh belongs all praise."
[Kitāb al-Tamhīd 7/145]
_________
And Imām al-Dhahabī (673-748) said:
“The ones who came later, amongst the speculative theologians, have invented a new understanding, and I do not know of anyone who had preceded them in this. They claim that these Attributes are passed over as they have come without giving it any meaning and while believing that the apparent meaning is not intended.”
[Al-ʿUlū li al-ʿAlī al-Ghaffār, p. 251]
Imām al-Dhahabī explained tafwīḍ of the meaning to be a false innovation and misguided understanding that was made up by the speculative theologians who came later on.
So leave the way of the deviant Mufawwidah and come to the way of the Salaf. May Allah guide me and you.
@@mahmudibnabidin this is what happens when you obviously don’t know how to quote texts nor do you have any isnad. It shows a lot. Anybody can quote, but correct quotes and fahm matter immensely. Taking from people who actually have asanid is essential, but it’s highly apparent you study on your own and falsely select quotes that are changed and twisted to suit your corrupted beliefs. That stuff doesn’t work around here.
@@ReturningRuh I am confused. I have brought quotes of the scholars saying we affirm the apparent meanings. They said this explicitly. I don't understand how you could reject this. If you want asanid, I'll give you them. I have the one for Sufyan ibn 'Uyaynah, and Ibn Hajar literally authenticated it. As for the other quotes, they are found in the books of the authors. Now I would like for you to explain: how I am twisting these quotes? How are these quotes changed? How am I misunderstanding these statements? Explain this to me, as I don't understand why you think I'm misinterpreting these *explicitly clear statements.*
6:27 to 7:07 😂
no one convinces me more than u
Lool
Asharees are mordern day jhamees
Jazaakumullaahu khayran