Yeah, that sort of thing can work if the play is moving more and you can wrong foot the defence. It relied on the slow hand offs to at the start to confuse the back and failed utterly. Without that, it's the worst sort of kick possible slow and loopy enough to be easy to predict and catch and shallow enough that the rinners chasing the ball can't catch up. At least a grubber kick can have a tricky bounce.
You should have had a cut from the Italy/England game a few years ago when Italy refused to form a ruck over the tackled player, and England were consistently blown offside! And you should have included Eddie Jones crying about it at the press conference. So intelligent, they changed the rules!
Wait why was the first girls kick included. ( 1:00 ) She had an almost certain try but kicked it over her head straight into the oppositions hands. It's one of the dumbest things i've ever seen. Why include something like that?
the one at @2:00 wouldn't count as he kicked the ball into the players foot in front of him whilst taking the tap, therefore making him offside... however, very clever idea
Isn't Sopoanga's play at 1:17 not legal (anymore at least)? To prevent a kick from going out for a line-out like that you have to have come from inside the field of play. If your starting point (where you jump from) is on or outside the line, then the line-out occurs.
I think quite a lot of the moves in this compilation are illegal. The Argentine flying wedge for example (2:00). I'm sure when I was refereeing it was illegal to bind onto another player from your own team who had not already been tackled by the opposition. It was also illegal to tap the ball over an opposition player (2:30) and then regather it.
18.2b The ball is not in touch or touch-in goal if: A player jumps, from within or outside the playing area, and catches the ball, and then lands in the playing area, regardless of whether the ball reached the plane of touch. So he's fine.
@@michaelhaddock8636Kolbe's one isn't illegal. The laws (11.4) say that if you have a reasonable chance of gathering the ball then it's ok, otherwise pretty much *every* interception attempt would be a knock on.
@@NiallMcKenzie an intentional knock-on *is* illegal though - he's not knocking on while attempting to gather the ball, he's batting it past an opponent.
@@RichLancs74 the hall hits his chest and goes forward, from the moment on, he’s in the process of regathering the ball until a) he catches the ball cleanly (play on) B) the ball hits the deck (scrum for the knock on) C) opponent catches it (scrum advantage for the knock on) D) kolbe makes contact with the ball again without catching, then we restart this process. You can’t just run up to a player and pop it forward over their head as you were in possession of the ball and that is a deliberate throw forward. However, caveat here, as kolbe is trying to gather the ball (from him knocking the ball forward), tackling him is completely legal here.
Every single one of these has one thing in common - high-speed decision making. The skill of a good rugby team mostly comes down to how quickly they can make and enact decision, and how much all the team mates are on the same wave length
I watched the play at 4:18 live at my school we beat our rivals that we haven’t beaten in over 10 years watch PBHS vs Affies to see how intense the game really was
Fun fact: the kick at 0:55 technically isn't a kick. The definition of a kick explicitly excludes the heel: "Kick: An act made by intentionally hitting the ball with any part of the leg or foot, except the heel, from the toe to the knee but not including the knee."
@@Heathen.Deity. its the Barbarians, they routinely do low-percentage, flashy plays for the entertainment value. I don't watch women's rugby but its nice to see the tradition is being kept
Thank you very much for the amazing video and awesome job on putting some women Rugby clips in the video. We need more women sport videos and I don’t mean “women highlights video clips” but a “highlight clip” and in this video there’s men and women sport clips.
3.29 James Simpson-Daniel takes Percy Montgomery out with a pass to himself, goes around Lomu and beats Cullen in the corner. Pity there's not better video of that.
Surprised you didnt include Peter Stringer just walking up to a converson and picking the ball up when the kicker started to move setting up the shot .
@@timjones7482 0:32 - Law 16.11 c - players must not take action to make opponents believe that the maul has ended when it has not. 0:56 - Law definitions - Kick - “an act made by intentionally hitting the ball with any part of the leg or foot, except the heel” 1:25 - exact same as 0:56, unless Red 6 (i think, the player that hit it with his heel) catches it, then it would be fine 1:50 - under current laws, illegal, but fine at the time (based on quality of video and referee kit!), though the flying wedge law (9.22) has been in for some time. 2:01 - player taps the ball forward into his team mate, therefore offside 2:49 - 15.16g - exact same as 0:32 above. 3 minutes in and that’s 5 instances of illegal play
@@Gazmaz they really haven’t. Many of these laws have been in place for years. The only one that I’m not sure on is the flying wedge, when that became law.
"Look at that back kick off the heel!!!".
Ball goes straight to opponent 😂😂😂
Yep it didn’t really achieve anything
Yeah, that sort of thing can work if the play is moving more and you can wrong foot the defence. It relied on the slow hand offs to at the start to confuse the back and failed utterly. Without that, it's the worst sort of kick possible slow and loopy enough to be easy to predict and catch and shallow enough that the rinners chasing the ball can't catch up. At least a grubber kick can have a tricky bounce.
You should have had a cut from the Italy/England game a few years ago when Italy refused to form a ruck over the tackled player, and England were consistently blown offside! And you should have included Eddie Jones crying about it at the press conference. So intelligent, they changed the rules!
4:45 was a knock on, Murray rolled it forward to pick it up!
After he assaulted the opposition halfback.
He used his foot bro
@@notyoureverydaycultist2579 It's after it hits his foot, he rolls it along the ground with his hand to gather it up when he's in front of the ball
Rolling the ball is not a knock on.
Wait why was the first girls kick included. ( 1:00 ) She had an almost certain try but kicked it over her head straight into the oppositions hands. It's one of the dumbest things i've ever seen. Why include something like that?
Because of the skill of the kick many of these moves don't lead to tries
spot on, the basis of these clips is not only the skill but the cleverness - that wasn't clever...
@@nickc5417 It was also illegal as you cannot kick the ball with your heel
@@joedennehy386 read the title of the video.
@@joedennehy386 also, how was it better than a normal kick?
the one at @2:00 wouldn't count as he kicked the ball into the players foot in front of him whilst taking the tap, therefore making him offside... however, very clever idea
Great vid. Shocking music.
Anyone know if the baba's lineout at 5:37 was given as not straight? Looks like it was caught at least 5 yards ahead of the throw
Isn't Sopoanga's play at 1:17 not legal (anymore at least)? To prevent a kick from going out for a line-out like that you have to have come from inside the field of play. If your starting point (where you jump from) is on or outside the line, then the line-out occurs.
I think quite a lot of the moves in this compilation are illegal. The Argentine flying wedge for example (2:00). I'm sure when I was refereeing it was illegal to bind onto another player from your own team who had not already been tackled by the opposition. It was also illegal to tap the ball over an opposition player (2:30) and then regather it.
18.2b The ball is not in touch or touch-in goal if: A player jumps, from within or outside the playing area, and catches the ball, and then lands in the playing area, regardless of whether the ball reached the plane of touch.
So he's fine.
@@michaelhaddock8636Kolbe's one isn't illegal. The laws (11.4) say that if you have a reasonable chance of gathering the ball then it's ok, otherwise pretty much *every* interception attempt would be a knock on.
@@NiallMcKenzie an intentional knock-on *is* illegal though - he's not knocking on while attempting to gather the ball, he's batting it past an opponent.
@@RichLancs74 the hall hits his chest and goes forward, from the moment on, he’s in the process of regathering the ball until a) he catches the ball cleanly (play on)
B) the ball hits the deck (scrum for the knock on)
C) opponent catches it (scrum advantage for the knock on)
D) kolbe makes contact with the ball again without catching, then we restart this process.
You can’t just run up to a player and pop it forward over their head as you were in possession of the ball and that is a deliberate throw forward. However, caveat here, as kolbe is trying to gather the ball (from him knocking the ball forward), tackling him is completely legal here.
Every single one of these has one thing in common - high-speed decision making. The skill of a good rugby team mostly comes down to how quickly they can make and enact decision, and how much all the team mates are on the same wave length
The play at 2:03 is offsides right? Kicked into a player in front of the kick.
What I thought too!
Yeah! Thought the same!
Had to look at it a few times but pretty sure you're right
100% offside, was just about to post the same
I watched the play at 4:18 live at my school we beat our rivals that we haven’t beaten in over 10 years watch PBHS vs Affies to see how intense the game really was
That was fantastic Rugby. The best tactics in Rugby is miss direction.
Fun fact: the kick at 0:55 technically isn't a kick.
The definition of a kick explicitly excludes the heel:
"Kick: An act made by intentionally hitting the ball with any part of the leg or foot, except the heel, from the toe to the knee but not including the knee."
Also just a stupid decision
@@matthofmann7517 I was going to say, is needlessly giving the ball away on a decent attack a “smart” or “high IQ” move?
@@Heathen.Deity. No. And not taking that as a free kick ~7 meteres is a -200 iq play. Everything not to do in that one.
@@Heathen.Deity. its the Barbarians, they routinely do low-percentage, flashy plays for the entertainment value. I don't watch women's rugby but its nice to see the tradition is being kept
@@philipeafroboy1 I get the Baa-Baa mentality, but picking this play as a “High IQ” example is a tad misguided
best rugby channel out there
Thank you very much for the amazing video and awesome job on putting some women Rugby clips in the video.
We need more women sport videos and I don’t mean “women highlights video clips” but a “highlight clip” and in this video there’s men and women sport clips.
3:45 cool American style overhand throw
Really enjoying your videos. Thank you
Isn't 1:49 just a flying wedge? That's not really high IQ, it's just foul play.
1:58 is illegal now tho
3.29 James Simpson-Daniel takes Percy Montgomery out with a pass to himself, goes around Lomu and beats Cullen in the corner. Pity there's not better video of that.
1:49 Le echaron el camión encima
Surprised you didnt include Peter Stringer just walking up to a converson and picking the ball up when the kicker started to move setting up the shot .
I inserted this moment in the first part:
ua-cam.com/video/2TtCeTqd4SE/v-deo.html
haha how bout Finn Russell's he-does-it-with-the-eyes pass in the match against England. What a game that was.
Wich is beter soccer or rugby
Top video!
Good video
find some better music
Nice video good
Look at that kick with the heel. Aaaaand... It s gone .
見ていて気持ちいいどす！
would have prefered to see the actual clips from one angle instead of conatantly-changing camera and cut-offs every second.
So many of these are just poor refereeing 🤷♂️
no there not
Name more than one…fool
@@timjones7482 0:32 - Law 16.11 c - players must not take action to make opponents believe that the maul has ended when it has not.
0:56 - Law definitions - Kick - “an act made by intentionally hitting the ball with any part of the leg or foot, except the heel”
1:25 - exact same as 0:56, unless Red 6 (i think, the player that hit it with his heel) catches it, then it would be fine
1:50 - under current laws, illegal, but fine at the time (based on quality of video and referee kit!), though the flying wedge law (9.22) has been in for some time.
2:01 - player taps the ball forward into his team mate, therefore offside
2:49 - 15.16g - exact same as 0:32 above.
3 minutes in and that’s 5 instances of illegal play
Problem is many of these clips are of instances before many of the law changes stopping the action being taken.
@@Gazmaz they really haven’t. Many of these laws have been in place for years. The only one that I’m not sure on is the flying wedge, when that became law.
After the back kick off the heel followed vy a no look pass i knew this was going to be an eh video lol
2 forward passes at 0.53 ? 🤔
Not allowed to kick with back of heel, its a knock on
How did the terribleness on 51 seconds get into this video?
An average day in the life of a footballer
Heel kick in the beginning blew a try. Not smart play.
Not bad re graphics explaining what will happen but too many with no result
So slightly smarter than toddlers.
get ride of the rubbish music!!!!
Some of these are pretty ordinary skills and you're not even including stuff like BOD's over the player pass to himself?
nope, still doesn't make any sense.
Pas une fois Dupont, Ntamack, Ramos pfff... It's a joke :)))))
Lose the annoying music!
Awful sound track.
Not allowed to kick with back of heel, its a knock on
Not allowed to kick with back of heel, its a knock on