Thank you for the video. This was the information I was looking for. I know a couple of investors that are looking to build a solar farm. This video explains the general idea of the project development and finances. Thank you again.
I am ramping up on Renewables. This is a Great preso; fresh, relevant and very timely. I (other viewers too?) would love to get a pdf of the the slide deck. Who may I ask?
Thank you for your effort. It was a wonderful insight in the world of Project Finance. I would like to know more about the EPC point of view for Solar and wind. How their models look like?
If EPC is not investing or taking equity, then there no model for them. If they need working capital facility or other short term loan, that does not require a financial model.
The US electric power grid has been greatly clean since the mid 1980s when acid rain from sulfur dioxide, particulate soot and unburned hydrocarbons had been addressed from coal fired electric power plants. Wind and Solar generated wild AC that is not charging storage or similar is mostly worthless because the dips of their energy output having to made up instantly typically by natural gas turbine generators running at high service idle consuming 70% of the fuel of full throttle, but producing little electricity. Worse, the public power grid has to pay for the grid use from homes with enough solar panels producing wild AC that it counters at a 1 to 1 exchange of buying electricity from the grid, but the public power grid has about the same cost for supporting that home as if it was supply all the electricity. In more extreme cases neighborhoods of large solar panel use where home owners are trying to push 24 hours of electrical use onto the public power grid in 4 - 5 hours of solar use it can overload the local neighborhood power grid with wild AC of little use, but the public power grid has to buy and support with upgraded power handling, but gets no revenue from it. This means that persons with good credit can finance their subsidized solar panels at a breakeven amount to them, but person's of lower financial means can not and are faced with paying in their electric bills for their better off neighbors electric grid use. It is scientifically impossible for greenhouse gas behavior to cause global warming. All the greenhouse radiant energy from the earth is completely absorbed in earth's greenhouse effect by greenhouse gases within 20 meters of the radiating surface that is always in saturation from the strong greenhouse gas water vapor. This video has the United Nations Climate Change disclaimer. Global warming was officially stated at 1.1°C in 1991 and 1.06°C in 2022. The cause of global warming is not known as of 2024. The back of the United Nation's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) science report states it took its greenhouse gas samples at 20,000 meters altitude where it is common high school level knowledge there is no greenhouse radiant energy. This is typical practice for deceptive marketing to state legal data transparency protecting the perpetrators from fraud prosecution. The IPCC has been transparent with its data acknowledging it is not dealing with active greenhouse gases. Earth's greenhouse effect is frequently used as a primary example to high school students of a system always in saturation from the strong greenhouse gas water vapor absorbing all the greenhouse radiant energy from the earth with greenhouse gases within 20 meters of the radiating surface that is all around us everyday and can't have its overall effect changed. There is no further greenhouse radiant energy to interact with greenhouse gases. At 1% average tropospheric water vapor over 99% of earth’s greenhouse effect is from water vapor. Water vapor would hold earth's greenhouse effect in saturation if it were the only greenhouse gas in the atmosphere. The overall average temperature gain to the earth from the earth’s greenhouse effect is 5.55°C (10°F). Arctic warming is taking place with the proving mechanism being warm Atlantic Ocean waters migrating deeper and more frequently into the Arctic Ocean warming it and the region. That warmer water is causing a few weeks less of reflective snow and ice coverage resulting in more solar heat gain to the Arctic region surface. Atmospheric CO2 levels of 1200 ppm about three times what they are today would greatly invigorate C3 plants the majority of plant life on earth greatly greening the planet. 0.4% of the atmosphere is CO2 and on average 1% is H20 water vapor. (1% H20)/(0.4% CO2) = 25. Water vapor is 25 times more present in the atmosphere on average than CO2. Water vapor has an CO2e of 18, 18 X 25 = 450 CO2e total for water vapor to 1 CO2e for CO2. The Earth’s oceans have 3-1/2 million sea floor volcanic vents warming the water and changing it’s chemistry that have not been systematically accounted for.
They’re not profitable enough and even if they were they would need the cash immediately to build more, as opposed to waiting for the tax credit to be applied on their return.
Excellent presentation! Thank you very much
Brilliant, sincerely grateful
Thank you for the video. This was the information I was looking for. I know a couple of investors that are looking to build a solar farm. This video explains the general idea of the project development and finances. Thank you again.
This was very helpful to me as investor in renewable energy. Thanks.
I am ramping up on Renewables. This is a Great preso; fresh, relevant and very timely. I (other viewers too?) would love to get a pdf of the the slide deck. Who may I ask?
Thank you for your effort. It was a wonderful insight in the world of Project Finance.
I would like to know more about the EPC point of view for Solar and wind. How their models look like?
If EPC is not investing or taking equity, then there no model for them. If they need working capital facility or other short term loan, that does not require a financial model.
Appreciate the insight.
Is it possible to get the slides from this presentation? thanks
Hi Matt -- yes! If you go to dartgo.org/EnergySeminars and scroll down to Josh's talk, you will find a link to the slide deck.
@@IrvingInstitute Hi, I have the same question. I cannot find any link, though. Could you please share the link to the PowerPoint again? thanks!
The US electric power grid has been greatly clean since the mid 1980s when acid rain from sulfur dioxide, particulate soot and unburned hydrocarbons had been addressed from coal fired electric power plants. Wind and Solar generated wild AC that is not charging storage or similar is mostly worthless because the dips of their energy output having to made up instantly typically by natural gas turbine generators running at high service idle consuming 70% of the fuel of full throttle, but producing little electricity.
Worse, the public power grid has to pay for the grid use from homes with enough solar panels producing wild AC that it counters at a 1 to 1 exchange of buying electricity from the grid, but the public power grid has about the same cost for supporting that home as if it was supply all the electricity. In more extreme cases neighborhoods of large solar panel use where home owners are trying to push 24 hours of electrical use onto the public power grid in 4 - 5 hours of solar use it can overload the local neighborhood power grid with wild AC of little use, but the public power grid has to buy and support with upgraded power handling, but gets no revenue from it.
This means that persons with good credit can finance their subsidized solar panels at a breakeven amount to them, but person's of lower financial means can not and are faced with paying in their electric bills for their better off neighbors electric grid use.
It is scientifically impossible for greenhouse gas behavior to cause global warming. All the greenhouse radiant energy from the earth is completely absorbed in earth's greenhouse effect by greenhouse gases within 20 meters of the radiating surface that is always in saturation from the strong greenhouse gas water vapor. This video has the United Nations Climate Change disclaimer. Global warming was officially stated at 1.1°C in 1991 and 1.06°C in 2022. The cause of global warming is not known as of 2024.
The back of the United Nation's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) science report states it took its greenhouse gas samples at 20,000 meters altitude where it is common high school level knowledge there is no greenhouse radiant energy. This is typical practice for deceptive marketing to state legal data transparency protecting the perpetrators from fraud prosecution. The IPCC has been transparent with its data acknowledging it is not dealing with active greenhouse gases.
Earth's greenhouse effect is frequently used as a primary example to high school students of a system always in saturation from the strong greenhouse gas water vapor absorbing all the greenhouse radiant energy from the earth with greenhouse gases within 20 meters of the radiating surface that is all around us everyday and can't have its overall effect changed. There is no further greenhouse radiant energy to interact with greenhouse gases.
At 1% average tropospheric water vapor over 99% of earth’s greenhouse effect is from water vapor. Water vapor would hold earth's greenhouse effect in saturation if it were the only greenhouse gas in the atmosphere. The overall average temperature gain to the earth from the earth’s greenhouse effect is 5.55°C (10°F).
Arctic warming is taking place with the proving mechanism being warm Atlantic Ocean waters migrating deeper and more frequently into the Arctic Ocean warming it and the region. That warmer water is causing a few weeks less of reflective snow and ice coverage resulting in more solar heat gain to the Arctic region surface.
Atmospheric CO2 levels of 1200 ppm about three times what they are today would greatly invigorate C3 plants the majority of plant life on earth greatly greening the planet.
0.4% of the atmosphere is CO2 and on average 1% is H20 water vapor. (1% H20)/(0.4% CO2) = 25. Water vapor is 25 times more present in the atmosphere on average than CO2. Water vapor has an CO2e of 18, 18 X 25 = 450 CO2e total for water vapor to 1 CO2e for CO2.
The Earth’s oceans have 3-1/2 million sea floor volcanic vents warming the water and changing it’s chemistry that have not been systematically accounted for.
Wild AC? 0.4% CO2? 😂
I'm stupid. How do I double cash flow in the next 45 days
We need more attractive videos on possitive carbon projects.
Thanks
Why wouldn't developers have "tax appetite" or sufficient taxable gains to fully utilize tax attributes
They’re not profitable enough and even if they were they would need the cash immediately to build more, as opposed to waiting for the tax credit to be applied on their return.
we have solar plant projects in the philippines with 8 sites at 100MW production each site. could you help us get financiers to fund the project?
Comment vous contacter pour avoir notre performance attendus selon la date prévue
good
The timeline for myself
9:18