ATN X Sight II HD [review] - [Part 5] - Is it HD Quality ?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 14 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 19

  • @paulomachado2610
    @paulomachado2610 4 роки тому +1

    Hi Allan, my name is Paulo and I got the same scope and is a joy listening about the x sight and is a enormous help (at least 4 me), thank you. At least I learned a lot about something I didn't now about cos the scope atn is new for me to work with, I got different ones but still learning and you are a big help. Thanks

  • @davejalenderki
    @davejalenderki 4 місяці тому

    Howdy from Texas. Thank you for a very interesting series on the ATN scope. I have one on an AR that I built for my wife. I've learned a few things I didn't know about the optic by watching your series. I currently own many firearms but have ever owned an air rifle. I am very intrigued by yours and am curious what brand it is. It seems to be very accurate and your marksmanship is impressive. I assume that an air rifle at 25 yards would be comparable to a traditional firearm at 100. You completely obliterate the center of that target. It takes a good rifle, good optics, and a steady hand to make cosistantly accurate shots like that. Thanks for the videos and have a great day.

  • @180del
    @180del 8 років тому

    Great videos just bought the same scope and has been a fantastic tutorial on it.thanks

    • @airgunology
      @airgunology  8 років тому

      180del thanks and glad it has helped. please share

  • @airgunology
    @airgunology  8 років тому

    Part 6 and final part of the series is in the process of putting together all the good and bad points. Will try and get it recorded this week as a final conclusion. Been a bit busy with other things, but it is coming.

  • @carrida2010
    @carrida2010 8 років тому

    Great review series Steve. Question: How does the internal screen that you use as the eyepiece compare to the actual quality of the video? Is it 1:1 (i.e. the eye piece shows at the full quality that the video is recorded at) or is the monitor that acts as the eyepiece a lower resolution than the HD video that the sensor takes? Thanks.

    • @airgunology
      @airgunology  8 років тому

      David Carrico hard to say as it is so small. but if o had to answer, what you see in the video is what you see in the eyepiece and scope recordings. pixelated at zoom as only a 2.1mp ccd.

  • @hoppobun7
    @hoppobun7 8 років тому

    Great vid Steve your vids are very heloful ,i appreciate all the work you have put in.
    any chance of you doing ahunting vid with the X-sight??!!!
    ,atb brian

    • @airgunology
      @airgunology  8 років тому

      hoppobun7 working on it. dont have any proper shooting rights though

  • @jimmiller8389
    @jimmiller8389 7 років тому

    Pigeon was "13 inches" away? In the US that amounts to 1 foot plus an "inch". What does an "inch" represent in your part of the world if converted to yards and/or feet?

    • @airgunology
      @airgunology  7 років тому

      Not what you mean, the text at bottom says 30m and I said the pigeon was 30m away at about 8mins in the video
      . Perhaps my accent

    • @jimmiller8389
      @jimmiller8389 7 років тому

      Thans. I expected you may have meant meters. :)

  • @theg-man7868
    @theg-man7868 8 років тому

    Thanks Steve. What about battery life?

    • @airgunology
      @airgunology  8 років тому

      Yup as Wm Napier says, batteries suck, you need external USB battery pack with this scope.

  • @glenhurst5408
    @glenhurst5408 8 років тому

    Have you tried a more powerful IR? Wondering what the distance you can see? It would be good to see targets at night out to like 300m. I am seriously thinking about getting one just to test the waters.

    • @airgunology
      @airgunology  8 років тому

      Yes, swap out the free IR torch for a better one and you can see much further out. Check the other videos in the series on this ATN scope and I think I explain it in them. Thanks :)

  • @smucka1
    @smucka1 7 років тому +1

    Have enjoyed watching ur vids but u are comparing optical zoom vs digital zoom. Surely u weren’t surprised that u loose quality as u zoom. Since mobile phone had cameras we all knew digital zoom is abit pants. Now if they released one with a optical zoom. That would be good but the price would be Uber high. Keep making the videos.

    • @airgunology
      @airgunology  7 років тому

      No i was not surprised, but I was surprised at how bad it was and how slow the processing is.