Every US Army Ranger Squad in 80 Years

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 24 лип 2024
  • Become a Patron to support us & get exclusive perks: / battleorder
    Or Sign-Up as a UA-cam Member: youtube.com/@BattleOrder/memb...
    Check out our merch shop for new prints, apparel and other stuff!: battleorder.myshopify.com/
    If you'd like to make a one-time donation to Battle Order: www.paypal.com/donate/?hosted...
    Other Platforms
    • Website: www.battleorder.org/
    • 2nd Channel: / battleorder2
    • Twitter: / battle_order
    • Instagram: / battle.order
    • Facebook: / battle.order
    • Tiktok: / battle.order
    Sources:
    -World War II-
    • TO&E 7-85 "Ranger Infantry Battalion" (29 Feb 1944) via warestablishments.net
    • TO&E 7-85 "Ranger Infantry Battalion" (7 Aug 1945) via warestablishments.net
    • Sayen, J. "Battalion: An Organizational Study of the United States Infantry"
    -Korea-
    • "Reference Data: Infantry Regiment" (May 1951) published by The Infantry School, pp. ix, 43
    • TO&E 7-87 "Ranger Infantry Company (Airborne) (Tentative)" (17 Oct 1950) via warestablishments.net
    • Sayen, J. "Battalion: An Organizational Study of the United States Infantry"
    -LRRP/Vietnam-
    • TO&E 7-157H "Airborne Infantry Ranger Company" (1 Nov 1973) via warestablishments.net
    • TO&E 7-157E "Infantry Long Range Patrol Company" (28 September 1964) via Joseph Trevithick
    • FM 31-18 "Long-Range Reconnaissance Patrol Company" (August 1968)
    • FM 31-18 "Infantry Long Range Patrol Company" (January 1965)
    • Burford, J. "LRRP's in action"
    • Gebhardt, J. (2005) "Eyes Behind the Lines: US Army Long-Range Reconnaissance and Surveillance Units"
    • Terry, B. (2018) "Maintaining Capability and Options: Dismounted Reconnaissance in the Division and Corps Deep Area" p. 25
    -1974-2001-
    • TO&E 7-85H "Ranger Infantry Battalion" (30 May 1974) via warestablishments.net
    • FM 7-85 "Ranger Unit Operations" (June 1987), version approved for public release
    • Sayen, J. "Battalion: An Organizational Study of the United States Infantry"
    • Examination of photos posted by NARA
    -Present Day-
    • Conversations with two Late 2010s Rangers (2nd Battalion and 3rd Battalion) and one current serving Ranger
    • Examination of photos posted by 75th Ranger social media and DVIDS
    • FM 4-0 "Sustainment Operations" (July 2019) for the Ranger Support Company
    Chapters:
    0:00 - Introduction
    0:40 - WW2 (Merrill's Marauders & Rangers)
    3:50 - Korea (Ranger Infantry Companies)
    6:05 - Vietnam (LRRPs)
    9:06 - Late Cold War (Modern Rangers)
    11:03 - Current 75th Ranger Regiment
    11:32 - Ranger Battalion Organization
    14:28 - 75th Rangers Purpose
    17:40 - Current Ranger Squad
    18:50 - Ranger Tab vs. Scroll
    19:44 - Ranger Squad (cont'd)
    25:10 - Ranger Platoon
    25:14 - Weapons Squad
    26:37 - Platoon HQ
    27:09 - Attachments
    Music:
    "Thirty Seconds Out" - Medal of Honor 2010 OST
    "To Guadalcanal" - Medal of Honor Pacific Assault OST
    Medal of Honor Allied Assault Main Theme
    "Falaise Road" - Call of Duty 3 OST
    "Behind the Dusk" - Trailer Worx
    "Machiavellian" - Wendel Scherer
    "Are You Ready" - Philip Ayers

КОМЕНТАРІ • 395

  • @BattleOrder
    @BattleOrder  7 місяців тому +71

    There is a Patron-exclusive video live on the evolution of British Army Infantry Battalion organization during the Napoleonic Wars: www.patreon.com/posts/exclusive-video-90287180
    Also there are designs on the shop, including a poster depicting the current US Army Ranger Squad: battleorder.org/shop

    • @pyeitme508
      @pyeitme508 7 місяців тому +4

      Rad 😊

    • @nathanmartin9640
      @nathanmartin9640 7 місяців тому +4

      Do royal marine next please

    • @alandesouzacruz5124
      @alandesouzacruz5124 7 місяців тому +2

      Make a vídeo about australian sasr

    • @declanmurphy6427
      @declanmurphy6427 6 місяців тому +2

      Do they get supplied with body bags as well as bullets?

    • @TennesseeOperator
      @TennesseeOperator 6 місяців тому +3

      Make a smaller video on MAC-V-SOG, not just the recon teams but also the Supply and Rear Enders

  • @ViktoriousDead
    @ViktoriousDead 7 місяців тому +325

    Something to consider is that modern Ranger regiment is basically never at full strength. Most of the time you’re lucky to have 7-8 guys in a squad, we deployed and did isometric HVT night raids with platoons of 20-25 rangers, especially in the winter time when the birds lift capability is hindered by the cold.
    Typically everything we do now is platoon level, but the way late GWOT was we often did things at the squad or team level, my fireteam went to northern Afghanistan to imbed with RRC and worked soon as a three man team for sometime.

    • @Soulseeker223
      @Soulseeker223 7 місяців тому +59

      To elaborate, NO modern US Army unit is at full strength lol

    • @kekistanimememan170
      @kekistanimememan170 7 місяців тому +25

      Recruitment crisis.

    • @guglielmotranchina249
      @guglielmotranchina249 7 місяців тому +34

      Also remember SOF cannot be mass produced

    • @clonescope2433
      @clonescope2433 4 місяці тому +2

      ​@@kekistanimememan170Which can be traced back to several things, but including the major one a lack of pay crisis. There's only so much benefits can make up for.

    • @kpkp-hc1hq
      @kpkp-hc1hq 4 місяці тому +6

      In my era 5-7 men squads were common. The only time I remember we were at full strength was right before Panama. When we got back, within a few months, about 20 percent of the battalion quit. Because they could go anywhere they wanted with a CIB and coming from the Regt.

  • @jarodaffygaming276
    @jarodaffygaming276 7 місяців тому +96

    The fact he called ranger school a suckfest means he has done his research lol

    • @publiusscipio5697
      @publiusscipio5697 7 місяців тому +3

      I thought it was a leadership school 😮

    • @thewhiteknightman
      @thewhiteknightman 7 місяців тому +41

      ​@@publiusscipio5697Kinda sorta. On paper, it is the "premier leadership school of the Army," and it is highly recommended for officers and senior NCOs in the infantry to attend. In practice, it's just 62 days of Vietnam LARPing with sleep deprivation and hunger thrown into it. Basically, it's a way for the Infantry top dogs to haze you into the Club. That being said, if you want to prove you can do it and think you have what it takes, do it. Just know that a tab doesn’t automatically make you a superior leader, no matter what some colonel or general says. I've met lieutenants without tabs that were absolutely awesome and their guys would follow them to the ends of the Earth, and I've met lieutenants with tabs that were huge POS's and treated their platoons as stepping stones to higher positions, and everything in between. Sincerely: a tabless MI Captain who was branch detailed into the Infantry and still managed to get solid OERs as a PL and XO.

  • @Killerpixel11
    @Killerpixel11 7 місяців тому +273

    Regarding the AT-4 dud rate; I've recently seen a thread by a volunteer EOD tech currently in Ukraine, who pointed out (since he has to deal with them) that the high dud rate is specific to the American M136 variant, which seems to be significantly cost-cut.
    Original Saab AT-4s from Sweden (and other NATO allies) are apparently much more reliable.

    • @Kishuun
      @Kishuun 7 місяців тому +88

      I think the dud rate is high for the American variant as many of them are past or about to be past their service date. These launchers are very old and the only time they were used in the past 20 years is to occasionally shoot at a building. During one of our first deployments we had to shoot our entire battalions stock of them before we rotated out as they were not going to be used after we left the country.

    • @jb76489
      @jb76489 7 місяців тому +14

      citation needed
      and given the changes the americans made were to the bumpers, sights and sling, i doubt this is true

    • @chinesesparrows
      @chinesesparrows 7 місяців тому +32

      All ammo become less reliable overtime, they are consumables. Even 155mm arty shells and nukes require parts replacement and recheck to be reliable.

    • @MandolinMagi
      @MandolinMagi 7 місяців тому +6

      Really? You'd think after dud 2.36" stuff in Korea and the terrible early M72 the Army would have learned

    • @thebigmon
      @thebigmon 6 місяців тому +9

      “I read somewhere on Reddit…”

  • @jason12518
    @jason12518 7 місяців тому +85

    Super accurate, I saw you got "snot" right too which is cool, but another thing is weapons sl is called "weasel" (wep squad leader), batt moved to Glocks before the sigs hit regular army which is why I figure most still run Glocks never understood why it wasn't the 17, and saw gunners can be untabbed if they're a competent and strong "private." The person who carries sked or seeker ect is who they like the least (and isn't carrying belt fed) basically

    • @wehrwxlf2
      @wehrwxlf2 6 місяців тому +9

      I’ve heard that when procuring the first run of glocks into the military they were not able to get authorized for a pistol the same size of the beretta so they were forced into getting the 19 because it fit a “different role.” Whatever that means.

    • @jason12518
      @jason12518 6 місяців тому +5

      Oh that makes a lot of sense. "different role" is kinda funny when talking about a handgun but it rings true haha.@@wehrwxlf2

    • @oneiljunior9837
      @oneiljunior9837 2 місяці тому

      What is ect?

    • @jason12518
      @jason12518 2 місяці тому

      @@oneiljunior9837 just meant etcetera like ladder, hoolie tool, hammer, stuff of the sort

    • @Muddy_Reviews
      @Muddy_Reviews 19 днів тому

      ​@wehrwxlf2 They were able to justify the "need" for the Glock 19 for a concealable hand gun for low visibility and clandestine operations where the M9 would prove to be too bulky. That's how I understand it anyway.

  • @Tekisasubakani
    @Tekisasubakani 7 місяців тому +30

    "Oh, you're a Ranger, that's cool. What do you do?"
    "I'm a SNOT."
    :D

  • @jackseaward2330
    @jackseaward2330 7 місяців тому +697

    PLEASE do Royal Marines next.

    • @abrahamgn3614
      @abrahamgn3614 7 місяців тому +18

      No

    • @MNWilfriedII
      @MNWilfriedII 7 місяців тому +55

      OH YEAH!!, ROYAL MARINES AND/OR PARA REGIMENT (UK)

    • @jackseaward2330
      @jackseaward2330 7 місяців тому +38

      @@MNWilfriedII Both is good. Royal Marines peak my interest a big more with the reignited interest in raiding in recent years. A video about Paras' doctrine could be nice since they fly around in Chinooks and rovers with Javelins to hit enemy tank formations from behind. But then again, same goes for Royal Marines and their raids.

    • @Spuggky45
      @Spuggky45 7 місяців тому +13

      I'd definitely watch that

    • @zeus866
      @zeus866 7 місяців тому +5

      No.

  • @thebashar
    @thebashar 7 місяців тому +128

    This is fascinating. A video that I would love to see would be one on army support and logistics. My wife is a food safety officer and thus part of the vet corp and I would love to learn how that came about.

    • @jabber1990
      @jabber1990 7 місяців тому +10

      would she still have to go to RASP if she wanted to go Ranger?
      I've always wondered how that worked

    • @BattleOrder
      @BattleOrder  7 місяців тому +31

      I have a video on my second channel that goes over the main Army logistics units: ua-cam.com/video/scbJZjQncqE/v-deo.htmlsi=yqjXEL4JYRMHjhcI
      And a more in depth one about fuel logistics: ua-cam.com/video/cgeVuwxOkAo/v-deo.htmlsi=UzSQkzpTV6zj6m2m

    • @k53847
      @k53847 7 місяців тому +8

      @@jabber1990 Supposedly everyone goes through RASP. Officers go through RASP2, which is less physical but supposedly even harder and more sucky in some ways than regular RASP.

    • @thebashar
      @thebashar 7 місяців тому +5

      @@jabber1990 Just asked her, she says yes she would have to go to RASP.

    • @defions4208
      @defions4208 6 місяців тому +1

      @@jabber1990everyone in Regiment is a Ranger meaning they have gone through RASP to wear that scroll doesn’t matter if they are infantry or a cook. Everyone goes. That’s why Regiment has the most bad ass cooks out there.

  • @Soulseeker223
    @Soulseeker223 7 місяців тому +34

    As a general rule of thumb (at least currently) US military units are under strength with leadership positions often being taken by soldiers of a rank lower than the position is supposed to have. Hell I've even seen Specialists in Staff Sergeant positions before.

    • @Omnia-Via
      @Omnia-Via 7 місяців тому +6

      In some guard units, they have cadets as "interim" PLs because of how understaffed many are.

    • @qreepyQT
      @qreepyQT 4 місяці тому

      @@Omnia-Viapeople reject to be called hero and be thanked for their ‚service‘ for unaliving children somewhere far away in stranger countries

  • @punn213
    @punn213 7 місяців тому +56

    Everyone knows the Ranger squad of D-Day had six men; four with thompsons and two with bazookas

    • @m1garandMUSIC
      @m1garandMUSIC 7 місяців тому +26

      They can also run really really fast for about 10 seconds every minute

  • @Dikranovski
    @Dikranovski 7 місяців тому +74

    Good to have you back and we do appreciate the longer videos like old times.
    One minor request though, could you bring back the old design when you cover Second World War topics? Just like the Soviet Artillery video for example. That aesthetic was amazing.

  • @aaroncook2052
    @aaroncook2052 7 місяців тому +35

    Great video as always. Although I'm shocked that you didn't mention the whole issue with how officially the LMG team was supposed to have a 1919 by the 1944 TO&E, but after the various exercises in preparation for D-Day they realized how impractical assaulting across the beach or up a cliff face with such a weapon was.

  • @richardnoah2922
    @richardnoah2922 7 місяців тому +16

    Colonel Darby is one of my personal favorite historical Army Officers, a front leader and in my opinion, a massive badass.

  • @wyattredman4747
    @wyattredman4747 7 місяців тому +14

    The Medal of Honor theme hit me hard...

    • @czwarty7878
      @czwarty7878 5 місяців тому

      I absolutely love this, the soundtrack is masterpiece. This is how WWII sounds to me. Nothing else will ever come close, this position is solidified forever

  • @nikyfgh
    @nikyfgh 7 місяців тому +55

    I'm happy to see a video on the Rangers, always loved the gear they have and was curious about their organization throughout their time. Great video!
    (Also would it be possible to add music list to description please? Some of the tracks used sound really good.)

    • @BattleOrder
      @BattleOrder  7 місяців тому +9

      I've added the music to the description

    • @nikyfgh
      @nikyfgh 7 місяців тому +3

      Thank you!

  • @ericb.4358
    @ericb.4358 7 місяців тому +12

    75th Rangers will be among the very first units to get the new M7 6.5 x 51 battle rifle with the M157 Vortex sight "system" andthenew M250 in the same cartridge. That should give then :overmatch' against any Com Bloc infantry weapons.
    As thatch improves likely Rangers will utilize electric motorcycles for scouting in some situations.

  • @BlindMonk93
    @BlindMonk93 7 місяців тому +24

    Wow, might be your best video yet. Great visuals, ace detail and explanation. Worth the long bake.

  • @michaelmcgraw1536
    @michaelmcgraw1536 7 місяців тому +24

    Great video! I would love to see a similar breakdown of US Army SF groups!

    • @aaroncook2052
      @aaroncook2052 7 місяців тому +7

      I think they have changed very little at the lowest level. Been based around the 12 man ODA since the 50s.

  • @seeleagent
    @seeleagent 7 місяців тому +6

    the m72a7 has a breakaway rail mount meant for an LAM PEQ. This enables use at night. once used, you can snap the mount off.

  • @charlessmith9903
    @charlessmith9903 7 місяців тому +4

    I know a guy who was a Ranger during Vietnam. He doesn't talk about it AT ALL. My old DS once told me thats how i know we wasnt lying. Every time I asked as a kid we went back. To add insult to injury my names Charlie. I've seen pics of him in country though and he had a M3 Grease Gun.

  • @LRRPFco52
    @LRRPFco52 7 місяців тому +6

    Awesome video. I was in F Co 52nd Infantry LRSC, among many other units. I wanted to add that Ranger Regiment got M4A1s in 1994.

    • @LRRPFco52
      @LRRPFco52 7 місяців тому

      A Raid is a Deliberate Attack with a planned withdrawal, designed to capture or kill enemy forces, destroy enemy weapons & equipment, or rescue friendly hostages/POWs.

    • @rockylewis5218
      @rockylewis5218 4 місяці тому

      Yeah, I was going to mention that when I got to 1st Batt in '96 the only soldiers still carrying the M16A2 were junior riflemen. Even my M203 was the M4 variant.

  • @polkbritton
    @polkbritton 7 місяців тому +9

    Very well done. My grandpa was in the Mars Task Force (formerly Merrill's Marauders) in WWII. He became a battlefield-promoted squad leader with the rank of technician 3rd grade (T/3). According to his discharge he was issued an M-1 rifle.
    Merrill's Marauders was divided into combat teams roughly based around a battalion and meant to have assets allowing them to be more "self-sufficient" -thought to be an asset in jungle fighting.
    The MTF went back to regular infantry regiment organization and featured pack artillery, signals, and a mobile medical unit. This structure, with its support elements, proved to be much better at sustaining long range penetration missions.

  • @janhoffmann7454
    @janhoffmann7454 7 місяців тому +13

    thanks god battle order is back. great video, probaly the best yet. keep up to good work and show us some more sof / infantry related conent

  • @toysoldier6093
    @toysoldier6093 7 місяців тому +11

    This was an absolute treat. Excellent work.

  • @sleepingninjaquiettime
    @sleepingninjaquiettime 7 місяців тому +9

    Recondo school was legendary. The Ranger and Airborne infantry LRP/LRRP and Marine Force Recon troops had the longest missions outside the wire, and by most were considered the craziest troops in Vietnam. Thats a good thing in combat arms.
    As someone who deployed with an M4 and pistol, the pistol was annoying. We figured if we were down to just using pistols we were already dead. But pistols do have an advantage in breaching if you're that brave.

    • @nikitachirich7985
      @nikitachirich7985 6 місяців тому +2

      Yessir , there was a whole segment of MACV that used nothing but a 1911 and a flashlight. Go in there and don’t come out till 1800 hours! ✌️🎖️

  • @TheForgeFather
    @TheForgeFather 7 місяців тому +8

    Congrats on the marriage. Here's to it working out and a happy future to you both.

  • @RandomGuy-hr8sb
    @RandomGuy-hr8sb 7 місяців тому +4

    This is your best video yet. Didn’t even feel like half an hour, loved it. Please do more on ARVN or the Bundeswehr.

  • @TheCerebralDude
    @TheCerebralDude 7 місяців тому +5

    The book “The Soul Patrol” is an excellent book about the first all black LRRP team in Vietnam

  • @saturnv2419
    @saturnv2419 7 місяців тому +6

    I just read the news the other day Rangers are also testing the new XM7 and XM250 NGSWs alone side 101st, wonder if that would change things up a bit.

    • @BattleOrder
      @BattleOrder  7 місяців тому +7

      I feel like if they had a choice at the personal-level, they'd use the XM7 like the Mk17 and not like they currently use the URGI

  • @jheinrichk
    @jheinrichk 7 місяців тому +1

    Awesome vid, very informative. Thanks for doing this piece!

  • @MiklRngr
    @MiklRngr 7 місяців тому +3

    During Late Cold War (from formalization of the Ranger Battalions in modern day through Regimental stand up and likely past the invasion of Panama), Rifle Platoons consisted of 4 squads. The 4th Squad was an organic weapons squad consisting of machine guns (M60). The squad had three teams (gunner, assistant gunner (AG), and ammo bearer (AB)). Squad leader was the senior E-6 (assistant Platoon Sergeant) and gunners were senior E-4s and sometimes Sergeants. AG was an E-4 and AB was a private. Each gun team was attached to a rifle squad unless operating in support of the platoon as a whole. ABs would carry M14 (using same ammo as M60) or an M16 while both the gunner and AG carried M1911s.

  • @johnkennedy619
    @johnkennedy619 7 місяців тому +1

    Fantastic video, a lot of work went into it. Thank you.

  • @HumbleDirtMerchant
    @HumbleDirtMerchant 7 місяців тому +3

    All good info, Mr. Order. I had no idea the Rangers rode around in Strykers.

  • @Kaebuki
    @Kaebuki 7 місяців тому +1

    Video was really good and content-filled, I like the new transitions! Belated congratulations on your marriage!

  • @geewee1geewee197
    @geewee1geewee197 7 місяців тому +3

    Hey man, it's been awhile! Great to see you back!

  • @endercraft4976
    @endercraft4976 7 місяців тому +5

    Once again an awesome video, keep up the good work! If possible I would love to see more videos on European Armys like Germany, Poland or Sweden in the future

  • @CraigLYoung
    @CraigLYoung 7 місяців тому

    Thanks for sharing and Merry Christmas to you and your family 😅

  • @ShadowRaids666
    @ShadowRaids666 7 місяців тому

    Exceptional video explaining the regiment in detail.

  • @PilotCFIWesHead
    @PilotCFIWesHead 7 місяців тому +2

    Dude in the middle school of the thumbnail was my platoon leader when I got to 1st Batt in '83. The photo is from Granada.

  • @JohnDoe-rw5um
    @JohnDoe-rw5um 7 місяців тому +2

    The Field Feeding Section (food service) at 13:30 utilizes a Pac Man logo.

  • @GoalsBYMen
    @GoalsBYMen 4 місяці тому

    W Video so informative keep them coming especially the shorts I love them so much Thank You and God Speed

  • @ElMachoMucho
    @ElMachoMucho 7 місяців тому +12

    I was in and the best way to describe how weapons were given out as dumb as it sounds wasnt where they were implemented best but through seniority. Tabbed guys have first dibs on what they want and most of the time pick shortys. When I was new I couldnt even choose my optic till I was tabbed.

  • @TheVioletMongrel
    @TheVioletMongrel 7 місяців тому +1

    Love seeing more recognition for LRRP/LRS, great video!

  • @GeorgeKovacs-re2qo
    @GeorgeKovacs-re2qo 7 місяців тому +7

    I am quite pleased with the accurate historic explanations especially concerning the 5307th Composite Group legacy. I would be very interested in a discussion of the OoB and TO&E of the 1st Special Service Force experience as a precourser to the modern SOF.

  • @happyboygogo
    @happyboygogo 7 місяців тому +4

    great video as always! would love to see a breakdown of the MIB and STB as well (maybe on the second channel?)

  • @jhosk
    @jhosk 6 місяців тому

    Very informative, thank you!

  • @drunkmasterOK
    @drunkmasterOK 7 місяців тому +4

    Wow, very impressing! Great military history and tradition. Excellent trained and equipped units.
    Although, I got zero information about UAVs in the US Ranger teams.
    E.g., nowadays in Ukraine many of average infantry platoons, companies have some small civil UAV (DJI Mavic Mini or Mavic 3 for better observation of a battlefield or some anti-armor first person view UAV 7" size or more with some mounted RPG ammo or other explosives). Almost in every infantry, motorized, and mechanized brigades we have UAV companies (mostly strike anti-armor FPV UAVs 7-10" quadcopters or bigger, including planners).
    SOF units operate strike/anti-armor FPV and other UAVs in a regular basis.
    As you may know, we have some big continental war with a huge amount of artillery, armored vehicles, unmanned systems, radio-electronic warfare, and hundreds of kilometers of trenches. Fucking new reality, folks...

  • @Callsign_Hayley
    @Callsign_Hayley 6 місяців тому +1

    My great grandfather was one of the first US Army Rangers one of the original Darby’s Rangers so it’s really nice to see a video about the history of them ty for making a video about this 🫶❤

  • @trundelingporpoise2404
    @trundelingporpoise2404 7 місяців тому +1

    That MOHAA music activated ALL the nurons in my brain

  • @KonradAdenauerJr
    @KonradAdenauerJr 7 місяців тому +1

    Thank you for featuring that 1980s Army recruitment ad.

  • @violetxiv367
    @violetxiv367 7 місяців тому

    Glad to see you back

  • @GreenBlueWalkthrough
    @GreenBlueWalkthrough 7 місяців тому +2

    Good to have you back! Which I had no idea that Rangers where only a thing on ocastion... That they like Marines had a clear line of use since the founding on the US.

  • @jeffsilverman6080
    @jeffsilverman6080 7 місяців тому

    This was all some great work

  • @Key_highway
    @Key_highway 7 місяців тому +2

    “Babe wake up battle order just uploaded”

  • @crimsonking4151
    @crimsonking4151 6 місяців тому

    amazing work here dude

  • @GuidoMillonezz
    @GuidoMillonezz 6 місяців тому +1

    What a quality of videos! 6 stars! thank u! I donated already...

  • @bobsagetbillboard1876
    @bobsagetbillboard1876 7 місяців тому

    About time you cover the regiment 😃

  • @SemperFiRblx
    @SemperFiRblx 7 місяців тому +2

    quite nice and informative

  • @heleenstander2361
    @heleenstander2361 7 місяців тому

    Thanks!

  • @Bigcat726
    @Bigcat726 7 місяців тому

    2:12 the Medal of Honor music brings back memories of the old games

  • @GAJake
    @GAJake 7 місяців тому +5

    This is a little different of a video idea, but what about making a fictional squad/platoon organization for a militia for a "red dawn" scenario? How would citizens be able to organize and what weapons could we find if we had to fight a guerilla war against a foreign occupation? I'm sure you could find lots of references from Ukraine, the Viet Kong, the war on terror, etc.

  • @yorkiesa
    @yorkiesa 7 місяців тому +1

    That MOH Allied Assault music gets me right in the nostalgia.

  • @joewozniak711
    @joewozniak711 6 місяців тому

    Great Video!!!🎉❤

  • @Filip7370
    @Filip7370 6 місяців тому +3

    Why there is no mentioning about colt 653 appropriately called rangers Carbine?

  • @CrossOfBayonne
    @CrossOfBayonne 7 місяців тому +2

    M1 Carbines were also used in the Rangers ranks during WWII, Before D Day one of the Thompson SMG's was replaced with a Carbine for the Normandy invasion

  • @CanukIsNotAGoose
    @CanukIsNotAGoose 6 місяців тому

    This was truly a wonderful fucking video, gave me the answers to all my questions, man you’ve got a sub from me, holy, this video was amazing

  • @batjackjohnson252
    @batjackjohnson252 7 місяців тому

    Good work

  • @farrazaulia2917
    @farrazaulia2917 7 місяців тому +2

    Cool video man

  • @tensortab8896
    @tensortab8896 7 місяців тому

    Great video.

  • @true_shermanator1129
    @true_shermanator1129 7 місяців тому +2

    Love the video's, have you thought about doing a similar video on Marine Recon Battalions?

  • @jeffreyholdeman3042
    @jeffreyholdeman3042 6 місяців тому +1

    90’s era . Well done on this video! RLTW.

  • @noodles5438
    @noodles5438 7 місяців тому +10

    I thought Ranger MG teams had 3 men like the USMC on paper. The Rangers now use the MK48 Mod 1 and no longer the Mod 0, I’m not sure if that was for contrasting the look so it’s easier to showcase the M249 v the MK48 in the video as different as the two look almost identical. The MK17 can also be seen using the 5.56 Caliber kit by some NCO in the Battalions despite the MK16 being removed.
    That’s but some nitpicking to boost the algorithm. Good job on the vid. 👍

    • @BrianT175
      @BrianT175 7 місяців тому +1

      Size of a Ranger MG team literally just corresponds with how many excess Privates that particular platoon has. AG and ABs are considered cherry positions until they gain the experience to move on to a rifle squad or come back as a gunner usually after RS. Though a cherry can certainly go straight to a rifle squad as well.

    • @ViktoriousDead
      @ViktoriousDead 7 місяців тому +1

      @@BrianT175different per company, the Gunners were always the privates and the AG’s the gun team leaders typically

    • @BrianT175
      @BrianT175 7 місяців тому

      @@ViktoriousDead my info probably old. In my day we almost exclusively used mk48s and TL was always the gunner.

  • @wyattmull9436
    @wyattmull9436 7 місяців тому

    I respect the fact that you are using the Call of Duty 3 soundtrack in the first part of this!

  • @officercat7907
    @officercat7907 7 місяців тому +5

    LOVE your videos! Do you think you’ll ever do Soviet Spetsnaz of the 70s or 80s?

  • @czwarty7878
    @czwarty7878 5 місяців тому

    This is perfect, the best video on Rangers history. With how much they were changed, disbanded and recreated I always wondered how close today's Rangers even remain to original WWII units, and this video answered it 100%. And congratulations on marriage too!

  • @hellbreaksloose5536
    @hellbreaksloose5536 7 місяців тому +6

    First of all congrats on your wedding. Wouldn’t the 11.5’’ barrels get priority for the suppressors. Also there was the one time where one battalion ( I think it was 3rd. Btn) had SCAR-Ls instead of M4s. Great video keep it up.

    • @GTAC13
      @GTAC13 7 місяців тому +6

      1/75 tested them in Afghanistan but found that there was no significant benefit to switching to them, especially with the Block II program starting at the time. SOCOM has conversion kits for the MK17s which rechamber them into 5.56 which are rarely used, but there have been some photos of rangers with them in the last few years.

  • @themilkman5401
    @themilkman5401 7 місяців тому +9

    Currently enlisting as a Navy BU rate, and the son of a CM (My old man was NMCB 5, served in Helmand Province in 2009 - 2011 and took part in the Battle of Marjah). Would it be possible to see a future video on the United States Navy Seabees (Construction Battalions for those who don't know) and their formations?

  • @kalimakalima5536
    @kalimakalima5536 7 місяців тому

    Glad to see it

  • @jairustheadventurer3935
    @jairustheadventurer3935 7 місяців тому +2

    If I were to serve, I'd want to be a Ranger.

  • @YuccavdHeide
    @YuccavdHeide 7 місяців тому +1

    Would love to see a video on the armor of the Royal Netherlands army

  • @pyeitme508
    @pyeitme508 7 місяців тому

    Amazing 🤩 hope Green Beret videos soon

  • @conneranderson219
    @conneranderson219 6 місяців тому

    Your channel is cool man

  • @AppalatchieRaised
    @AppalatchieRaised 7 місяців тому

    Outstanding

  • @michaelgriggs395
    @michaelgriggs395 2 місяці тому +1

    Loved the video. Civilians and a lot of regular army soldiers just have no clue how badass the Ranger Regiment has become the last 20 years during GWOT. Their equipment, training, funding, and support has went through the roof. I would any size Ranger element against any other non special forces element of the same size any day of the week and the Rangers will come out on top. They might come out on top against a lot of other countries special forces also. They are THE premier light infantry unit in the world. #RLTW

  • @PresidentsPlayhouse
    @PresidentsPlayhouse 7 місяців тому +1

    Good video, how about a video for the 1st Special Forces Operational Detachment-Delta or SEAL Team Six/DEVGRU ?

  • @matthewbrowatzke6024
    @matthewbrowatzke6024 7 місяців тому +1

    Congratulations

  • @The_Faceless_No_Name_Stranger
    @The_Faceless_No_Name_Stranger 7 місяців тому +7

    It interesting that the rangers evolved from a quasi shock unit to a recon unit to a quasi SOF unit that’s bigger than SOF so they hit harder

  • @christopherphillip9506
    @christopherphillip9506 5 місяців тому

    Fantastic breakdown of the Rangers. Keep up the good work.

  • @matthewfox1561
    @matthewfox1561 7 місяців тому +1

    A video like this would be great on TV.

  • @brycebuchanan1138
    @brycebuchanan1138 7 місяців тому +3

    I wouldn’t mind seeing video on coast guard outfits

  • @brdd514
    @brdd514 7 місяців тому

    @BattleOrder you should prepare to do a lengthy video on the new Army Restructure about to drop

  • @steveaustin2686
    @steveaustin2686 7 місяців тому

    13:32 Please tell me the icon for the Field Feeding Section is the official one. LOL
    A Pac-man symbol is too funny!

  • @Chenillecosmique
    @Chenillecosmique 7 місяців тому +1

    Great job, as always. Could you add in the s of you videos the musics you used ? Thanks Mr Order.

    • @BattleOrder
      @BattleOrder  7 місяців тому +2

      I've added the music to the description

  • @11BRelo
    @11BRelo 7 місяців тому +1

    Awsome content wasn’t a Ranger but reg 11B within a Stryker Battalion (damn metal coffins) these dude are FR the top of the game in terms of light Infantry.

  • @solidspooks8689
    @solidspooks8689 7 місяців тому +1

    The squad leader probably carries the M72 just so he can tell the privates he actually IS the law!

  • @matheeson
    @matheeson 7 місяців тому +1

    Amazing warriors 🙌🏾

  • @peterbui3733
    @peterbui3733 6 місяців тому +1

    The symbol for class 1 - rations looks like a crescent moon. The video has it shaped as Pac-Man haha.

  • @fridrekr7510
    @fridrekr7510 7 місяців тому +39

    I've always been a little confused about the Rangers. It basically seems like just another light/airborne infantry unit that has been classified as "elite". In other armies, the light and airborne forces are normally already considered elite and the special forces are organised in small teams sigficantly different from the infantry. I guess it's just because the U.S. forces are so big, that they can afford to pick the best from their "regular" light forces and group them together in a special regiment.

    • @BattleOrder
      @BattleOrder  7 місяців тому +51

      The regular airborne units are generally considered somewhat higher quality on the personnel level, but they don’t have that many special skills outside of airborne infil. The Rangers have much more time/money to train, focus just on warfighting, and have a lot higher standards. People that get kicked out of the regiment or fail selection (provided they have gone to airborne school, which isn’t actually the case for new entries now) go to the regular airborne units typically. The Rangers also have a real role within JSOC, whereas regular Army airborne units don’t

    • @personalaccount8914
      @personalaccount8914 7 місяців тому +10

      They are an airborne light infantry unit, but they're an elite one, the best in the history of the world.

    • @V.B.Squire
      @V.B.Squire 7 місяців тому +4

      ​​@@BattleOrderare the rangers still the closest US equivalent to the British Commando in the WW2 concept?

    • @ViktoriousDead
      @ViktoriousDead 7 місяців тому +3

      @@V.B.Squireno, the US version of the SAS is essentially CAG, they filled the role of the original WW2 Rangers

    • @V.B.Squire
      @V.B.Squire 7 місяців тому +6

      @@ViktoriousDead sas and commandos were 2 different things

  • @formwiz7096
    @formwiz7096 7 місяців тому +3

    Wrong on the WWII stuff. First, the 1st Special Service Force was part of the Ranger heritage and basically was structured in the same way, albeit with 3 platoons to a company instead of 2. This remained so until 1969when the Combat Arms Regimental System was split to give the Rangers and SF separate lineages.
    Second, Ranger sections were originally patterned after the Army rifle squad with 12 men, but split into identical squads with the ranking squad leader as section leader (see James Altieri's The Spearheaders).

  • @ellists3163
    @ellists3163 6 місяців тому

    My guytism loved this video