Canucks This Week: Feb. 1

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 13 вер 2024
  • Patrick Johnston joins Paul Chapman in this week's video to tell you about the Elias Lindholm trade. Did the Canucks give up too much? What's the best and worst case scenario for this deal? What does it mean for the roster and how the team plays? And perhaps most importantly, is there another shoe to drop with another trade? Canucks This Week is brought to you by Paragon Roofing.
    ______________
    For up-to-the-minute B.C. news and the latest on the Canucks, B.C. Lions and Vancouver Whitecaps, bookmark The Province: theprovince.com/
    Sign up for our free Canucks Report and other newsletters: theprovince.co...

КОМЕНТАРІ • 22

  • @LittleBagofRice
    @LittleBagofRice 7 місяців тому +1

    After several months, I have clearly come to enjoy this duo of Patrick and Paul as the mos genuine, most informative and the least likely to deliver fluff

    • @paulchapman6750
      @paulchapman6750 7 місяців тому

      much appreciated. If you have a topic you'd like us to cover or a specific question to ask, go ahead.

  • @philinbangkok
    @philinbangkok 7 місяців тому +4

    I always enjoy watching you both talk about the Canucks, great discussions and information, straight to the point.

    • @patrickjohnston2352
      @patrickjohnston2352 7 місяців тому

      appreciate the feedback! glad to know you're enjoying these.

  • @dougkormilo3236
    @dougkormilo3236 7 місяців тому

    Good job boys sensible talk
    16:17

  • @theevilascotcompany9255
    @theevilascotcompany9255 7 місяців тому +1

    If you go on social media, both teams got screwed on this trade. That's gotta be a first.

  • @semiwindup
    @semiwindup 7 місяців тому +1

    Thanks guys. Great discussion.

  • @CashMacGregor
    @CashMacGregor 7 місяців тому +2

    always leave me wanting more.

  • @kentnilsson465
    @kentnilsson465 7 місяців тому +2

    I enjoy two people talking instead of shouting....... Also woulld Duclair be a fit?

    • @paulchapman6750
      @paulchapman6750 7 місяців тому +1

      Lol, you should hear us in our meetings.

    • @patrickjohnston2352
      @patrickjohnston2352 7 місяців тому

      Duclair certainly could be an interesting option as a depth forward...but at this point who would he be replacing in the lineup?

    • @kentnilsson465
      @kentnilsson465 7 місяців тому

      I see him as a low cost lottery ticket that could pay off given better surroundings. If traded for he would play with Pettersson and Lindholm due to Mikheyev not playing very well, putting him on the 4th line. Either Åman or Lafferty comes out.

    • @braydoncharltin2664
      @braydoncharltin2664 7 місяців тому

      Duclair doesn’t fit with Lindholm on board, can see Col or Eddy after him possibly

  • @trippinout.
    @trippinout. 7 місяців тому

    Lot's of speculation on Tanev being part of the deal but Van balking at a 1st rounder. Who was moving out to absorb the 4.5 for Tanev? Someone had to go.

    • @patrickjohnston2352
      @patrickjohnston2352 7 місяців тому

      yes i think that part was a big sticking point. just looking at the cap, Canucks would need Calgary to retain salary, so you're paying a price for that too.

  • @chriskozma3507
    @chriskozma3507 7 місяців тому +2

    They should get a defenseman

  • @alh466
    @alh466 7 місяців тому

    More to come, they still need depth in blue line and bottom six

  • @davideaston6944
    @davideaston6944 7 місяців тому