Andrew Schulz Reviews Barbie & Oppenheimer After HISTORIC $235 MILLION Box Office Opening

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 26 лип 2023
  • Watch Full Episode - • JiDion on Meeting Trum...
    Flagrant is a comedy show that delivers unfiltered, unapologetic, and unruly hot takes directly to your dome piece. In an era dictated by political correctness, hosts Andrew Schulz and Akaash Singh, along with AlexxMedia and Mark Gagnon, could care less about sensitivities. If it’s funny and flagrant it flies. If you are sensitive this podcast is not for you. But if you miss the days of comedians actually being funny instead of preaching to a choir then welcome to The Flagrancy.
    Join the Patreon Army:
    bit.ly/2xQwHYf
    #AndrewSchulz #AkaashSingh
    Find Andrew Schulz at:
    / andrewschulz
    / andrewschulzny
    / @theandrewschulz
    andrewschulz?lang=en
    www.theandrewschulz.com/
    Watch his Special 'INFAMOUS' at: • Andrew Schulz - INFAMO...
    Watch him in 'You People' starring Eddie Murphy & Jonah Hill on Netflix
    Find Akaash Singh at:
    / akaashsingh
    / akaashsinghcomedian
    / @akaashsinghcomedy
    akaashsingh?lang=en
    www.akaashsingh.com/
    Watch his Special 'BRING BACK APU' at: • White Male Privilege i...
    Find Mark Gagnon at:
    markygagnon...
    markygags?lang=en
    / @markgagnon
    Find AlexxMedia at:
    alexxmedia...
    alexxmedia?lang=en
    www.alexx.media/
    Book studio time at WTF Media Studios here: www.wtfmediastudios.com/home
  • Комедії

КОМЕНТАРІ • 474

  • @sirdoobiehowzer3888
    @sirdoobiehowzer3888 11 місяців тому +221

    Andrew went into Oppenheimer expecting a batman movie 😂

    • @jr5993
      @jr5993 11 місяців тому

      All of these guys are mentally challenged.

  • @chrism.728
    @chrism.728 11 місяців тому +408

    Christopher Nolan did an awesome job with Oppenheimer, Andrew, you're off on that critique.

    • @PedroTorres-ky2yx
      @PedroTorres-ky2yx 11 місяців тому +21

      Nah, I watched yesterday and felt exactly the same. Also no one's saying Nolan did a bad job, just that it was good/solid, but not as amazing as expected.

    • @Dawg476
      @Dawg476 11 місяців тому +15

      @@PedroTorres-ky2yxIt’s a historical movie plus idk how someone can watch this movie and say Oppenheimer was a bad or immoral egotistical dude. Oppenheimer never had an ego.

    • @PedroTorres-ky2yx
      @PedroTorres-ky2yx 11 місяців тому +4

      @@Dawg476 ok, then. Agree to disagree.

    • @tomsmith2277
      @tomsmith2277 11 місяців тому +7

      He's bang on about his analysis of the bomb scene - contrast of celebratory yet eerie.
      The movie was never meant to be about the making of the bomb - it's about what the making of the bomb does to the person who made it. No one with no ego makes it, yet no one with sound judgement does (hence the Germans going after it) - I felt that was beautifully explored in the film and you felt a sense of genuine conflict.
      If you study history, you realise there are no good people - it's like Warhammer.

    • @db2ez_
      @db2ez_ 11 місяців тому +2

      @@PedroTorres-ky2yxI thought it was amazing

  • @ticoman90
    @ticoman90 11 місяців тому +353

    Never underestimate Schulz & his clown posse’s ability to have the wrong take on just about any issue possible.

    • @cjspyker
      @cjspyker 11 місяців тому +22

      Jidion isn't right either this is the most dumb conversation about Barbie I ever seen

    • @timkinley1779
      @timkinley1779 11 місяців тому +2

      Another grown man puking out "like" six times per sentence.

    • @403.FORBIDDEN
      @403.FORBIDDEN 11 місяців тому +2

      What lame hater takes on their takes

    • @jr5993
      @jr5993 11 місяців тому

      The guy is an absolute tart.

    • @jamk2668
      @jamk2668 11 місяців тому +6

      "Hollywood is so unoriginal but doing lame pranks on youtube or producing incredibly shallow conversations on a podcast is the mark of something groundbreaking." I mean, Hollywood has never been unoriginal really but it's not whatever these two are doing requires much skill or talent. Also, there's a whole world of international/arthouse cinema these guys won't touch.

  • @SuperCreyson
    @SuperCreyson 11 місяців тому +432

    Never seen 2 people misunderstand movies so hard.

    • @myka4337
      @myka4337 11 місяців тому +50

      Andrew usually has bad takes on movies

    • @kartinmarl.7804
      @kartinmarl.7804 11 місяців тому +53

      Thinking Oppenheimer is “aight” genuinely feels like an insult

    • @cf644
      @cf644 11 місяців тому +2

      I don't think he means any disrespect

    • @ChampionOfHammerfell
      @ChampionOfHammerfell 11 місяців тому +11

      @@kartinmarl.7804nah, first its an opinion so who cares. Also, yeah the movie after the bomb went of dragged for so long with RDJ’s character. I liked the movie, but wouldn’t watch it again. And Barbie had good jokes but overall terrible 🗿

    • @ArmyofDrag343
      @ArmyofDrag343 11 місяців тому

      ​@@ChampionOfHammerfellyou're too opinionated, ur scaring the hoes

  • @stat4x
    @stat4x 11 місяців тому +336

    honestly after seeing Oppenheimer at first i was like it was alright but rethinking it, it was an amazing movie. such beautiful shots and a great way to tell the story

    • @Dawg476
      @Dawg476 11 місяців тому +3

      Some people just think surface layer which ruins the movie.

    • @amandanorris8
      @amandanorris8 11 місяців тому +5

      Yes! I found it to be one of the best biopics ive ever seen. The directing REALLY were stellar

    • @immanuelcunt7296
      @immanuelcunt7296 11 місяців тому +1

      That's not enough to make a movie great, the characters were flat and robotic. Actors were great but the characters weren't written anything like real people

    • @ArmyofDrag343
      @ArmyofDrag343 11 місяців тому

      I think that means you're slow, but you got there

    • @peterparker9954
      @peterparker9954 11 місяців тому +2

      The music is one of the greatest ever

  • @xivi13ix
    @xivi13ix 11 місяців тому +48

    Oppenheimer is Nolan's masterpiece...its a 3hr movie and wow it kept me at the edge of my seat and Cillian Murphy was born to play Oppenheimer

    • @intello8953
      @intello8953 11 місяців тому +5

      It’s Nolan “Masterpiece”? Bro what? Freaking Inception and The Prestige is a way better movie then Oppenheimer 🤦🏾‍♂️. I swear every time a major movie comes out from a good director you guys are like “this sh*t is a masterpiece” smh🙄. I can just tell you guys are not a Nolan fan but are just generic fans of movies

    • @inthevoidreality
      @inthevoidreality 11 місяців тому +1

      @@intello8953 hm but thats ur opinion.. for me Oppenheimer is on par with prestige.. and prestige is my favourite

    • @intello8953
      @intello8953 11 місяців тому

      @@inthevoidreality lol it’s 100% not but ok I guess

    • @jean-pierremestanza8186
      @jean-pierremestanza8186 11 місяців тому +1

      Nah, his masterpieces are Inception and Interstellar. Oppenheimer was great. But those films are 10/10

    • @redarrowhead2
      @redarrowhead2 11 місяців тому +1

      ⁠@@intello8953nah it’s not. This movie trumps inception although not by a lot. Inception explored perception of reality and the dream within a dream concept but the acting was worse. This movie just explored deeper philosophical questions and the acting was overall better. They’re both great movies though

  • @wizzzer1337
    @wizzzer1337 11 місяців тому +6

    The whole point of the of Barbie is the inverse of the "morale" you thought it was.
    It's satire on how women get so few seats in congress, so similarly Kens are only in the beginning stages of their rights.

  • @JamesDescutido
    @JamesDescutido 11 місяців тому +44

    The problem with people seeing Oppenheimer is that they expect to be entertained, as if it was an action-packed blockbuster (that’s how I went into it). But the fact is, it’s a complex character study about a man who’s faced with a huge moral dilemma and how he deals with that. That’s what the film does best. It’s absolutely not for everyone but I think part of the negative criticism of the film is that people expect it to be something that it’s not.

    • @kyhxx
      @kyhxx 10 місяців тому +1

      . etc- 70more days till out of theaters^

  • @shaggyfeng9110
    @shaggyfeng9110 11 місяців тому +72

    As someone who like science and history and politics and cinema and music, Oppenheimer is my favorite film of all time. The first 2 hours and 15 min felt like an hour. The last 45 min felt like 1.5 hour. Already watched 2 times, both on the best seat, IMAX 70mm and digital IMAX. I will watch it again when IMAX 70mm is not fully packed. Oppenheimer felt like a piece of real memory.

    • @lucasgarcia8986
      @lucasgarcia8986 11 місяців тому

      Agreed his style of film making was perfect for this type of subject matter. I feel if anyone else but Nolan made this film it would of been mundane. He really knows how to make any situation impactful.

  • @zombie4129
    @zombie4129 11 місяців тому +8

    Not every movie is for everyone but man did these guys completely miss the points of each movie

  • @GRR1MN1R
    @GRR1MN1R 11 місяців тому +30

    the major issue was people went to get a Dark Knight treatment for a biopic type movie

    • @jr5993
      @jr5993 11 місяців тому

      All of these guys are garden variety retards.

  • @Mintleton
    @Mintleton 11 місяців тому +49

    professional comedians utterly incapable of recognizing or understanding basic satire

    • @beebs_magoo
      @beebs_magoo 11 місяців тому +1

      I understand the Barbieland parts of the movie were used as an engine for satire, but it's not satire to beat the drums of "The real world is a horribly oppressive patriarchy." They believe that, and they don't sugarcoat it. It's in every atom of feminist art. Barbie gets ogled, cat-called, and sexually assaulted within 5 seconds of being in LA. Mattel is run by evil patriarchs even though the real Mattel has always been largely ran by women. All men are depicted as absent-minded, stupid, manipulative, evil.

    • @user-kb1hw2yq2f
      @user-kb1hw2yq2f 11 місяців тому +1

      How so? Im a bit ignorant to that statement and I'd love to know what you meant by that.

    • @taliavelazquez358
      @taliavelazquez358 11 місяців тому +2

      @@user-kb1hw2yq2fThey are talking about Barbie, it was a satire on gender roles. They changed Barbieland so Kens could have more influence on the territory. I think they are saying that people are seeing Barbie on a surface level.

    • @validatedclassified2564
      @validatedclassified2564 11 місяців тому

      Nah he gets it. He's uncomfortable with it because of his politics.

  • @yampipampi
    @yampipampi 11 місяців тому +89

    The thing with Oppenheimer - I thought it was a 8/10 watching it - but I spent the whole next day thinking about it, government, the military industrial complex, etc. (yeah it may sound corny - but the film makes you think.) Which is why I think it is a crowning achievement - It's not the most entertaining film, but it makes you feel something.

    • @M-O-Z
      @M-O-Z 11 місяців тому +6

      I find that with most of Nolans movies tbh, i think about them for a wk after. Not seen Oppenheimer yet tho.

    • @michaelotis223
      @michaelotis223 11 місяців тому +1

      it stayed with me on the ride home....I think that was its job

    • @apocalypsepow
      @apocalypsepow 11 місяців тому

      It's corny to think?

    • @garethconner1009
      @garethconner1009 10 місяців тому

      Ya know what? That silly Barbie movie also made ya think. Crazy. Can't wait to see Opp.

  • @nathanpitek3177
    @nathanpitek3177 11 місяців тому +13

    Oppenheimer has already made more than twice it’s budget worldwide and it’s going to be in theaters for 100 days, longest time in like 10 years. It’s gunna crush everything

  • @VEILmscx
    @VEILmscx 11 місяців тому +8

    Schulz saying Oppenheimer was “alright” is indicative of his choices with his run as an actor.

    • @mjz667
      @mjz667 11 місяців тому

      More indictive of his retarded mental state.
      I don't mean that as a throwaway slur. His mental state is literally held back if he cannot appreciate the greater context and history of this film

  • @ZeppelinPotts-kl2rb
    @ZeppelinPotts-kl2rb 11 місяців тому +19

    OPP was a 3 hr movie... for the sheer length, it kept me engaged; which says alot; for a movie that long..
    And the ending scene. Or the revelation about what Einstein actually said. Nice bow on the whole thing

  • @camerontessier6850
    @camerontessier6850 11 місяців тому +44

    you can always count on Andrew and his crew to have the most smooth brain opinions on any topic

    • @jr5993
      @jr5993 11 місяців тому

      The guy is a an absolute fool. Just as vapid as most comedians.

    • @MoeDoe1
      @MoeDoe1 10 місяців тому +2

      Are y’all BOTS? You and other comments are repeating almost the same thing word for word. Weird.

  • @rhysdavidso.n
    @rhysdavidso.n 11 місяців тому +6

    Honestly y’all it felt tongue in cheek and satirical. I don’t think you should be taking it SOOO literally

  • @BigSexyWizard
    @BigSexyWizard 11 місяців тому +26

    Barbie was one of the funniest movies I’ve seen in the last few years. I was howling laughing multiple times throughout the theater. Ken was the best part of the movie. Oppenheimer was absolutely fantastic and I think everyone should see it atleast once but it’s something to watch multiple times and take it all in.

    • @eswag153
      @eswag153 10 місяців тому

      There hasn’t been a funny movie in like 10 years lmao

    • @K39751
      @K39751 10 місяців тому

      ​@@eswag153 Have you seen the movie RRR ?

  • @DeRussellMasina
    @DeRussellMasina 11 місяців тому +33

    Oppenheimer is for people who can follow dialgue & story telling.
    It's the best film I've seen since Flight with Denzel & eclipses it by a county mile

    • @redarrowhead2
      @redarrowhead2 11 місяців тому

      It’s in the top 5 Movies for me. But it’s not for everyone and it’s not a perfect movie. If you’re not into philosophical thought provoking movies and ur not looking at interesting cinematic shots then it’s not for you

  • @Rjmc19
    @Rjmc19 11 місяців тому +14

    expecting anything batman from oppenheimer is the most ridiculous thing. i loved it. its about the then current political climate, the heavy decision making between whats right from wrong, from the personal, professional, social, and political level. it was meant to put us there in the shoes of everyone and feel it deeply, very anxiety inducing and amazingly done. expectations are the biggest enemy of pleasure. I'm always excited for a nolan movie but i can't compare movies directly because they're usually different. his movies are his children in a way and i woundnt compare my children. sure its not for every one, but the right mindset and context can put you off

    • @kyhxx
      @kyhxx 10 місяців тому

      . etc-

  • @knospeapex4570
    @knospeapex4570 11 місяців тому +62

    I feel like to fully appreciate Oppenheimer you have to have some knowledge of the physics behind it. Seeing all of the famous physicists who’s equations you use almost every day of your life gave the movie more depth and caused me to be truly excited throughout.

    • @ericks9284
      @ericks9284 11 місяців тому

      I also feel like you need to know more about history. Why in the scene where they get the reports that the Germans are closer to a reactor and not a bomb was because heisenberg and others were deliberately sabotaging the project. Or why we actually dropped the bomb on Japan. Sure we could’ve won without it but the Japanese are on record that they would never have stopped and made it a war of attrition. This isn’t a patriotic film it’s a biopic depicting the events around oppi and the knowledge he held . Imo the message of the movie is to be wary of a nuclear war and to not use those weapons lightly because you can legitimately set the atmosphere on fire

    • @tykeboy16
      @tykeboy16 11 місяців тому +2

      you definitely don't. Anyone can fully appreciate it.

    • @henrynguyen5343
      @henrynguyen5343 11 місяців тому

      If you have some knowledge about the topic, you would enjoy it more for sure. Like when Oppenheimer found out that splitting the atom was possible. I understand how important it was and it's more impactful for me.

    • @intello8953
      @intello8953 11 місяців тому

      Bro that made me hate the scientists even more 🤦🏾‍♂️😂. “Wow we found a way to split the atom…………… let’s make a weapon out of this to kill other human beings” not a good look. But I do understand learning the science behind it is amazing

    • @tykeboy16
      @tykeboy16 11 місяців тому

      @@intello8953 Unfortunately the world is not a friendly place at the highest levels. Having stronger weapons than your enemy is incredibly important. It is sad but that's reality.

  • @jamestzilvelis8639
    @jamestzilvelis8639 11 місяців тому +12

    imax isnt just visual lol and i was locked in watching it. flawless imo

    • @jamestzilvelis8639
      @jamestzilvelis8639 11 місяців тому

      ps- i dont think jidion is funny tbh

    • @redarrowhead2
      @redarrowhead2 11 місяців тому +1

      Not a flawless movie at all but still incredible. Id say pulp fiction is close to a flawless movie but this movie still beats pulp fiction for me despite imperfections

  • @etLOVEall
    @etLOVEall 11 місяців тому +9

    Oppie has rizzzz

  • @CURTAINS_
    @CURTAINS_ 11 місяців тому +14

    I enjoyed seeing everyone in the theater wearing pink more than the movie itself. I wish it was a bit more fun

  • @maverick3069
    @maverick3069 11 місяців тому +3

    6:24 Dude says "I'm not a woman". My brain instantly looks at how Aakash is sitting😂

  • @apocalypsepow
    @apocalypsepow 11 місяців тому +5

    Oppenheimer was amazingly well paced. Didn't look at phone at all

  • @RoyalFizzbin
    @RoyalFizzbin 11 місяців тому +2

    I see the dude on the left is cosplaying as one of the priests from Conan the Barbarian.

  • @dan12con
    @dan12con 11 місяців тому +1

    Schulz is cosplaying as Prison Mike from The Office.

  • @SumtingWong343
    @SumtingWong343 10 місяців тому +4

    I don't understand how someone can't see the beauty of Oppenheimer. This movie is a complete cinematic experience. Tension, great dillema, complex characters, amazing cinematography, visuel storytelling at it's best, the sound editing and soundtrack is INSANE.
    Saying you went to that movie expecting "The Batman trilogy" experience is one dumb way to anticipate a biopic movie about an historical figure and invention.

    • @Fred131_
      @Fred131_ 5 місяців тому

      Ppl can disagree with you lmao

  • @sunilrana5521
    @sunilrana5521 11 місяців тому +60

    Andrew's perception day on day is going down

    • @user-kb1hw2yq2f
      @user-kb1hw2yq2f 11 місяців тому +16

      His perception isnt the only thing going down. It seems like alot of these "professional" comedians, their standup is weak! Rogan is weak, Andrew, Tom just took a dive imo, Bert was NEVER funny (he just laughs at his own jokes) and dont get me started on female comics. The only pro comedian who is still funny is C.K.

    • @visca5821
      @visca5821 11 місяців тому +9

      @@user-kb1hw2yq2f "I don't find it funny so it's not funny" crowd is always weird, I wonder if it is stupidity or narcissism.

    • @2-bitsampler841
      @2-bitsampler841 11 місяців тому

      ​@@user-kb1hw2yq2f when did this happen?

    • @mr.yellowstrat3352
      @mr.yellowstrat3352 11 місяців тому +3

      They've been pretty cringy since they got into big money. All of them including my favorite Mark

    • @Thebearmre7
      @Thebearmre7 11 місяців тому +2

      @@user-kb1hw2yq2fyup is cas they buddies of joe and have gained big following Because how big he is. Anyone who sucked up to him has blown up.

  • @theweekendwheeler660
    @theweekendwheeler660 11 місяців тому +75

    "There is not one good character in the movie" has gotta be the most wack take ive ever heard. Oppenheimer is fantastic.
    EDIT: I realize he’s talking about character morality but dude still made wack takes 😂

    • @casual4560
      @casual4560 11 місяців тому +29

      I think he meant morally good , not good as in performance

    • @willsintheair
      @willsintheair 11 місяців тому +8

      I think he meant good as in good vs evil. None of the characters are clearly "good" people. Everyone's complicated.

    • @theweekendwheeler660
      @theweekendwheeler660 11 місяців тому +1

      @@casual4560 That’s gotta be the case. Cause all these actors delivered some PERFORMANCES.

    • @theweekendwheeler660
      @theweekendwheeler660 11 місяців тому

      @@willsintheair you right!

    • @dandragonmc
      @dandragonmc 11 місяців тому +1

      He explained himself at 9:25. It was about morality

  • @affiliatetips
    @affiliatetips 11 місяців тому +76

    Timestamps:
    00:00 - The video expresses a negative sentiment towards the lack of originality in Hollywood and the current state of the entertainment industry.
    00:03 - The video discusses a scene from a Barbie movie that surprises the speaker with its moral message.
    00:35 - The video describes a scenario in the Barbie movie where Barbie and Ken are depicted in different worlds, highlighting the influence of the patriarchal system.
    01:06 - The video suggests a scenario in Barbie land where Barbies emotionally manipulate individuals, causing conflicts and manipulations among them.
    01:40 - The video discusses a scene involving a bomb explosion and questions the necessity of atomic bombs in war.
    02:27 - The video discusses a movie scene where a military base is pitted against a town, creating confusion and ambiguity.
    03:35 - The video expresses mixed opinions about various movies and characters, including admiration for filmmaker Christopher Nolan and disappointment at the absence of a Batman trilogy from him.
    04:11 - The video emphasizes the significance of creating immersive and identity-driven experiences for fans and discusses the marketing strategy employed by a particular movie.
    04:49 - The video describes the author's experience at a movie theater and comments on the effectiveness of the marketing strategy for a specific movie.
    05:27 - The video discusses the perception and reception of the movie Barbie, including the expectation of numerical scores and the verification process for audience ratings.
    06:30 - The video discusses a movie scene involving Ryan Gosling's performance and expresses admiration for his humor and comedic timing.
    07:04 - The video mentions conservatives' reactions to the movie Barbie and speculates about their concerns regarding its influence on children.
    07:43 - The video discusses jokes in movies, the cultural relevance of toys like Barbie and Super Mario, and the popularity of dressing up for Star Wars events.
    08:11 - The video discusses the movie Brothers, including positive reviews and the speaker's personal enjoyment of it.
    09:10 - The video mentions the movie Oppenheimer and the absence of likable characters in it, highlighting the involvement of individuals associated with creating nuclear weapons.
    09:43 - The video presents fragmented thoughts and opinions about Oppenheimer, expressing a critical perspective on his actions and beliefs.
    10:14 - The video features a casual conversation discussing various topics, including communism, nuclear weapons, Russia, Russian women, and actress Margot Robbie.
    We've crafted timestamps to help you time! Show your support by subscribing to this video and our channel. If you'd like to go the additional mile, you can buy us a coffee at besaw.me/thanks Your generosity means everything to us! ☕
    Donators can have access to our Facebook Group, learn top-income strategies, and test apps like the instant chatbot creator below.
    Unlock the full potential of ChatGPT-4's advanced features for your chatbot projects! Bypass the normal restrictions after signing up for our free trial - only email is needed. Experience the magic now at: besaw.me/trial
    Video Description:
    The video discussed in this conversation covers various topics, including movies, characters, and cultural references. It begins with expressing a negative sentiment towards the lack of originality in Hollywood and the current state of the entertainment industry. The conversation then delves into a discussion about a scene from a Barbie movie that surprises the speaker with its moral message. It describes a scenario in the movie where Barbie and Ken are depicted in different worlds, highlighting the influence of the patriarchal system. The conversation suggests a scenario in Barbie land where Barbies emotionally manipulate individuals, causing conflicts and manipulations among them. It further discusses a scene involving a bomb explosion and questions the necessity of atomic bombs in war. The video also touches on a movie scene where a military base is pitted against a town, creating confusion and ambiguity. Mixed opinions about various movies and characters are expressed, including admiration for filmmaker Christopher Nolan and disappointment at the absence of a Batman trilogy from him. The significance of creating immersive and identity-driven experiences for fans is emphasized, along with discussions about marketing strategies employed in movies. The video describes the author's experience at a movie theater and comments on the effectiveness of the marketing strategy for a specific movie. It also discusses the perception and reception of the movie Barbie, including the expectation of numerical scores and the verification process for audience ratings. The conversation covers a movie scene involving Ryan Gosling's performance, conservatives' reactions to the movie Barbie, jokes in movies, the cultural relevance of toys like Barbie and Super Mario, and the popularity of dressing up for Star Wars events. The video mentions the movie Brothers, positive reviews, and personal enjoyment of it. It also discusses the movie Oppenheimer and the absence of likable characters in it, highlighting the involvement of individuals associated with creating nuclear weapons. Fragmented thoughts and opinions about Oppenheimer are presented, expressing a critical perspective on his actions and beliefs. The conversation concludes with a casual discussion about various topics, including communism, nuclear weapons, Russia, Russian women, and actress Margot Robbie.

  • @LegacyTeams
    @LegacyTeams 11 місяців тому +1

    I am excited these two movies did well!

  • @kartinmarl.7804
    @kartinmarl.7804 11 місяців тому +4

    He’s a Nolan fan and he thought it was “aight” haha… okay bro

  • @ManuelMartinez-hx8gs
    @ManuelMartinez-hx8gs 11 місяців тому +38

    If you really know about the story of Barbie you would know that the original creator of the doll Barbie is Ruth Marianna Handler the wife of one of the co-founders of Mattel Elliot Handler. The original doll was named Bild Lilli doll. Which was based off a old comic that portrayed a blond promiscuous woman who was not afraid to use men to her advantage. Mattel later bought the rights to the doll and
    Redesigned it to be Barbie. The doll was named after Ruth's daughter Barbara and then the made the ken doll and named it after her son
    Kenneth.
    Now to the movie which if you've seen it you can clearly see there are hidden messages and imagery. That being said in the beginning it has little girls discovering barbie in a reference to a movie called 2001 A Space Odyssey it, it shows them happily destroy their boring and oppressive baby dolls in violence and destruction. An obvious visual metaphor of little girls destroying the embodiment of motherhood to focus their lives instead on a shallow materialistic piece of consumerist trash and if this is lost on any of you people to realize then you guys are basically their target audience for this movie. The movie is basically about Barbie living in a fantasy land called Barbie land a place portrayed as a peaceful feminist utopia where all the important jobs are done by the Barbies and the kens just exist and give no inherent value, that they contribute nothing that they have no power or say in how their society is run and they're basically looked down on as silly and irrelevant by the Barbies.

    • @lurker993
      @lurker993 11 місяців тому

      I considered that to be the message of the film, but considering the hyper-modern-feminist director and Mattel's oversight, it seems unlikely that they were intentionally criticizing Barbie's influence as a product. Though, obviously I'd love for what you're saying to be true.

    • @hawaiianrussian1047
      @hawaiianrussian1047 11 місяців тому +7

      ….it’s basically like a movie for female incels 😂😂😂

    • @YassinePineapple
      @YassinePineapple 11 місяців тому

      @@WEAPON-MRX the opposite is true for men. So you have 0 value, you fuckin virgin 😂

    • @CD-bn7el
      @CD-bn7el 11 місяців тому +2

      Thank u. I am a woman but will not go c that bashing on men n making them look stupid. N kinda erasing family life. But that what feminist do. I had a hard working dad n amazing mom who was there everday caring for us a job in itself. The movie makes me sick to my stomach.

    • @Adriana-eu6ty
      @Adriana-eu6ty 11 місяців тому

      But then little girls go and rip head of their barbie dolls, cut their hair, put weird make up on them. Girls like to destroy things just as boys do.

  • @hunterm2799
    @hunterm2799 11 місяців тому

    “You like the dark knight?” Like bruh 🤣

  • @FEWEDZI
    @FEWEDZI 10 місяців тому

    Andrew in a durag though hahahaha

  • @mkader2494
    @mkader2494 11 місяців тому +5

    albeit small, Einstein was a 'good person' character in the film.

  • @Channel-lj1zx
    @Channel-lj1zx 11 місяців тому

    4:10 Exactly how I felt about Schultz Netflix show lol

  • @dalnim4294
    @dalnim4294 11 місяців тому +4

    Oppenheimer was fantastic

  • @matt554
    @matt554 11 місяців тому +34

    Andrew needs to rewatch the movie, bad takes. Also, needs to relearn his history as to why we dropped the two bombs.

    • @mjz667
      @mjz667 11 місяців тому +9

      Precisely. Japan was not surrendering short of a complete occupation of their land. The casualties required for that invasion would have been astronomical for both sides.
      Also, for anyone wondering about the need to stand up to Japanese imperialism in the Pacific and South East Asia, Japan exterminated somewhere between 3-30 million people during their occupation. To cry about 100 000-200 000 Japanese deaths without considering the horror they inflicted on others is disingenuous

    • @intello8953
      @intello8953 11 місяців тому +3

      @@mjz667so they had to drop the Bomb on civilians 🤨

    • @mjz667
      @mjz667 11 місяців тому

      @@intello8953 Wasn't a big enough Military target to demonstrate the bomb's power. This is a well known and documented discussion if you study history.
      They also mention it in passing in the film
      The military dictatorship of Japan had done a fantastic job of creating a cult of personality around the Japanese Emperor, even though they controlled him. You can see the utter devotion of Japanese soldiers to their country's cause demonstrated by the existence of kamikaze pilots, the culture of Sepukku and the fact that whole platoons did not surrender at the end of the war and carried on fighting in certain places.
      The Americans understood Japan's desire to fight to the bitter end, a fact many are forgetting to history in their quest to be nice rather than objective. They knew nothing short of a completely successful invasion and take-over of Japan would end the war. The cost of securing this objective would have been utterly devastating in terms of casualties to both sides. It would have also been a very protracted phase of the war. The Japanese civilian populace would have fought a guerilla war on the next level (Emperor worship, remember?).
      The sheer efficiency of the nuclear bombings demonstrated clearly to the Japanese the stakes of continuing the war and thank God, for the sake of the Japanese people, they made the right decision in surrendering. It was also the right decision for the Americans because of the lives saved on their side. The action also saved Japanese lives because an invasion would have been far more devastating. Which is why America would also have been justified to keep on bombing Japan.
      I will also add context to the historical situation. Enola Gay dropped the first bomb on Hiroshima on the evening of the 6th of August 1945. This was announced by President Truman the next morning, the 7th of August. The Japanese had two days to surrender but did not. The bombing of Nagasaki followed on the 9th. This further demonstrates Japan's unwillingness to surrender. It was not a fog of war situation. Eyewitness accounts in Japan document that the Japanese realization of a single, city destroying bomb was, within minutes, shortly after the bombing and even before Truman's announcement the next day. This demonstrates the cost of prolonging the war far outweighed the cost of the bomb.
      In my mind, it was a small price to pay based on the havoc Japan inflicted on South-East Asia and the Pacific in the form of 'the Asian Holocaust'. By which they killed an estimated 30 million people in those countries.
      We need to study history to ensure we do not repeat the mistakes of the past. We have had relative peace following WWII thanks to nuclear weaponry. History teaches us the path to peace is deterrence and the path to war is diplomacy. I pray America has been using her superior military spending to develop her best weapons even further and as strongly as possible. There are too many bad actors in this world who would curtail the relative freedom that Pax Americana has bestowed on the West. I also hope more countries such as Ukraine and those held in the bondage of Eastern suspicion and superstition can experience it. This will only happen if America can demonstrate further supremacy. Especially in areas of powerful weaponry

    • @intello8953
      @intello8953 11 місяців тому

      @@mjz667 so because there was a “cult following” and not enough “military target” that killing civilians was rational? When Americans and the British *the Soviets is a different thing* that killing is ok now? I hate hypocrisy so much maybe that’s why I’m confused by this whole thing. But thank God I wasn’t in that position
      Edit: also America has used its military horrendously around the world and became a Neo Empire 🤷🏾‍♂️

  • @Beatgrade
    @Beatgrade 11 місяців тому

    Oppenheimer was OPPENOVERRATED

  • @mirandam5746
    @mirandam5746 11 місяців тому +3

    I’m a woman and thought the Barbie movie was boring

    • @byyouthgonewild
      @byyouthgonewild 10 місяців тому

      Same. All the “funny” parts were in the trailer, and weren’t even that funny? I was honestly let down. I was expecting better.

  • @remixisthis
    @remixisthis 11 місяців тому +8

    Saw Oppenheimer opening day on 70mm and thought it was just alright. They speed run through so many things certain events are awkward (like a scene with his newborn) and most people aren’t fleshed out. You need to provide the context to give the movie meaning

  • @Thebearmre7
    @Thebearmre7 11 місяців тому +7

    Like I would ever go to these numpties for movie review. Specially of film like Oppenheimer.

    • @Dawg476
      @Dawg476 11 місяців тому +1

      It’s one of those movies that make you think beyond the movie, not surface level stuff. Plus Andrew saying all the characters were not “good” people just shows he never understood the movie.

    • @frankiecampos8909
      @frankiecampos8909 11 місяців тому

      @@Dawg476that’s what I found disappointing about the movie, I feel like it didn’t evoke further thought. What kind of questions did it make you ask?

    • @ibot2157
      @ibot2157 11 місяців тому

      You're literally here.

    • @jr5993
      @jr5993 11 місяців тому

      ​@@Dawg476hes a garden variety retard.

  • @marshallmarthes
    @marshallmarthes 11 місяців тому

    I didn't know that Andrew and I have so much in common. He mentioned exactly what I was thinking.

  • @Akame4514
    @Akame4514 11 місяців тому +2

    Rotten tomatoes verified just means people who bought the tickets so it’s more accurate than all audience

  • @JC-nt6pq
    @JC-nt6pq 11 місяців тому +2

    It did less than Batman vs Superman. Let's chill with how historic it is.

    • @lukebk12
      @lukebk12 11 місяців тому

      That movie was mid as hell

  • @ramonmartinez7775
    @ramonmartinez7775 11 місяців тому +1

    Take a shot everytime JiDion says "Like" and you will be drunk in no time.

  • @darrellhenry9152
    @darrellhenry9152 11 місяців тому +1

    Somehow they missed the point of both movies.

  • @alexandrabelloso2176
    @alexandrabelloso2176 10 місяців тому +1

    Jidion couldn't even properly say what happened at the end of the movie and completely missed the mark with his take. Also, seems like he didn't get the message of the movie. While it was heavily politicized, the point of the movie wasn't "screw all men". It's funny that Barbieland was trying to be a mirror of the real world (but with women in power), and some men got super offended by it. Very ironic.

  • @issaggg1087
    @issaggg1087 11 місяців тому +5

    Andrew thought The Idol was great so his opinion on movies/shows is alil ehh 😂

  • @alazkaalazka6087
    @alazkaalazka6087 11 місяців тому +2

    You include the Hiroshima nuke scene and the movie is 10/10. I understand why they didn’t show it.. because it’s all Oppenheimers pov. It’s his story. But still. I wanted more scale from the nuke scene. The score was intense asf tho

    • @redarrowhead2
      @redarrowhead2 11 місяців тому

      They could have done more with it I agree but it didn’t take away that much from the movie. Still thought the movie was incredible

    • @alazkaalazka6087
      @alazkaalazka6087 11 місяців тому

      @@redarrowhead2 100%. I’m just nitpicking a lil.

  • @rahultiwari.95
    @rahultiwari.95 11 місяців тому +1

    why is everyone wearing durags

  • @kirikanjau5065
    @kirikanjau5065 11 місяців тому

    why did they all say hmmmmm😂

  • @johnnypaycheck7727
    @johnnypaycheck7727 11 місяців тому

    Idk if I would’ve went in expecting dark knight Nolan

  • @josuesvlogs6360
    @josuesvlogs6360 11 місяців тому +3

    Andrew we have to have a chat

    • @ednamode2334
      @ednamode2334 11 місяців тому +2

      If it's about the doorag you've obviously not watched the start of the podcast

    • @josuesvlogs6360
      @josuesvlogs6360 11 місяців тому

      @@ednamode2334 nope haah

  • @ricky93100
    @ricky93100 11 місяців тому +2

    Yeah Oppenheimer is top tier Nolan

  • @cjspyker
    @cjspyker 11 місяців тому

    Jidion got the line from the movie completely wrong

  • @IceKoldKilla
    @IceKoldKilla 11 місяців тому +1

    I'm planning to smoke a lot before I go see Barbie. I wanna be stoned af. I think I'll really enjoy it like that. Otherwise I'm not wasting my time. Christopher's movie is definitely something I wanna go see.

  • @andimoraru5539
    @andimoraru5539 11 місяців тому +8

    I can relate with Andrew when he is saying that Christopher Nolan is the greatest director alive. Sometimes I am so emotional and passionate talking with someone about his movies that I almost cry 😅😅😅

    • @yisanimasa3050
      @yisanimasa3050 11 місяців тому +1

      Me with Kanye’s music🥹. And Nolan films of course

    • @intello8953
      @intello8953 11 місяців тому

      What is your favourite Nolan film?

    • @yisanimasa3050
      @yisanimasa3050 10 місяців тому

      @@intello8953 Interstellar, if I had to pick one. You?

  • @soundwave803
    @soundwave803 11 місяців тому +1

    Oppenheimer has Black Widow's kid sister in a nude scene. One time for Historical Heavies!!!!!

  • @kushal777
    @kushal777 11 місяців тому +8

    I think the fundamental point that Schulz is missing, and it’s not to his fault, that you need to be educated to appreciate this film. Not everyone has the aptitude for science and grounded films. At the end of the day, Schulz is a comic from the superhero fandom generation, and that’s how his expectations from every film is.

    • @kingjah6420
      @kingjah6420 10 місяців тому

      This is entertainment and Andrew is college educated

  • @Anon-yy6wm
    @Anon-yy6wm 11 місяців тому +1

    I enjoyed watching Oppenheimer, but I think for those who didn't enjoy the film as much was because of how the movie was promoted. In short, if you are into history you will love this film, if you are expecting shit to blow up every 15 minutes because it's a Nolan film, then you will be disappointed.
    **Small Spoilers ahead**
    It was promoted as if the movie was going to be about the Atomic bomb and the world causes and consequences of creating it (I also thought it would be about this). Half of the movie is about how Oppenheimer ended up leading a group of scientists to create the bomb but in actuality the movie is about Oppenheimer trying to keep his government security clearance. As one of my friend's put it "there was too much diologue". The film does take some time to show Oppenheimer's regrets once it's created. It also shows his regrets before it was created but he only agreed to do it because the Nazi's were already working on it and it was seen as "It's best if we have it before them".

  • @PenskeMaterial
    @PenskeMaterial 11 місяців тому +2

    My take away of Oppenheimer wasnt that he was a “piece of shit person” and i didnt think everyone in the movie were bad ppl. Had a way different perspective than andrew

    • @intello8953
      @intello8953 11 місяців тому

      So your gonna say it’s “complex” also? 🙄

  • @arunsalwan8558
    @arunsalwan8558 11 місяців тому +2

    my daughters r in college so i have no reason to see the movie but to be fair the barbie doll universe always made ken a side character with really no development

    • @jr5993
      @jr5993 11 місяців тому

      Yeah because men have action men. Small soilders is a great movie.

  • @RighAlban
    @RighAlban 11 місяців тому

    The only thing historic is they had to use two movies to claim anything historic, we're not even top five but if we add them together 🤔

  • @albinsaji1592
    @albinsaji1592 11 місяців тому +2

    Damn I really understood Oppenheimer different from Schulz. I didn’t think Oppenheimer was portrayed as a piece of shit more just as a flawed person who tried to do what he thought was best for the world, especially since it was wartime. The most POS thing he did in that movie was probably cheat on his wife but everyone back then cheated on their wife anyway

  • @SSJBenjie
    @SSJBenjie 11 місяців тому

    Im guessing people expected Oppenheimer to be a action pack movie, li everyone expected the latest Batman movie to be a action packed! Nigguh Batman is a mf detective 😂

  • @starwaving8857
    @starwaving8857 11 місяців тому

    At first I thought all wearing white socks like making white socks cool again, but just cups…

  • @KhanyoMjamba
    @KhanyoMjamba 11 місяців тому

    Oppenheimer is a great film. Dunno what you lads are on about.

  • @cameronhampton1315
    @cameronhampton1315 11 місяців тому

    Now I need to see the whole episode to see the lead up of them putting on these Durags. Lol

  • @AnthonyGarcia-sy3yk
    @AnthonyGarcia-sy3yk 10 місяців тому

    That is the whole point, dude, the famous Oppenheimer line ..I become death the destroyer of words , the dude feel like shit after make the bomb... one Andrew sounds like smart asf the next one like a dork. Haha, the dude is confusing ..

  • @christianpanizza2546
    @christianpanizza2546 11 місяців тому +3

    Commentary about originality coming from a prankster UA-camr is comical.

  • @Sunny.27
    @Sunny.27 11 місяців тому +11

    What Endgame was to guys, Barbie is to girls.

    • @Ambu557
      @Ambu557 11 місяців тому +1

      endgame??? u mean children ?

    • @immanuelcunt7296
      @immanuelcunt7296 11 місяців тому

      Lol you think the MCU had a gendered audience?

    • @apocalypsepow
      @apocalypsepow 11 місяців тому

      WTF does MCU have to do anything

    • @Jhon_wick03
      @Jhon_wick03 11 місяців тому

      you should replace endgame with dark knight

    • @AmaraQuellcrist
      @AmaraQuellcrist 11 місяців тому

      endgame is The Godfather of super heroes. but women literally have Kill Bill movies. Barbie is bad for kids and lots of toxicity for adults.

  • @shitsedits1875
    @shitsedits1875 11 місяців тому +13

    Anyone not getting the point of the Barbie movie is just beyond fathomable.

    • @lessforloans
      @lessforloans 11 місяців тому +3

      What is it?

    • @immanuelcunt7296
      @immanuelcunt7296 11 місяців тому +1

      No, we get the point, it's terrible, needlessly cynical, stupid, and pretentious

    • @NavjotSingh-lz5do
      @NavjotSingh-lz5do 11 місяців тому +1

      What's the point bro??

    • @Jhon_wick03
      @Jhon_wick03 11 місяців тому +1

      what is the point femboy

    • @jr5993
      @jr5993 11 місяців тому

      ​@@Jhon_wick03acting like males are hard done by is more feminine. Being a victim is not masculine.

  • @codysmiff222
    @codysmiff222 11 місяців тому

    Why the durag Schulz..

  • @christianlucas91
    @christianlucas91 11 місяців тому

    he shot it in imax for a reason.. but hey.. it was alright i guess

  • @joaquinibarra8886
    @joaquinibarra8886 11 місяців тому

    Wow this maybe was the worst trying of an analysis of a movie in history

  • @Greg9819T
    @Greg9819T 11 місяців тому +1

    Shultz is quite a bit off on this take . It’s not supposed to be like Batman

  • @alpaxdis9805
    @alpaxdis9805 11 місяців тому

    Hollywood has been epic fail

  • @davegriffiths2256
    @davegriffiths2256 11 місяців тому

    I went to see transformers and the flash. Dead set if I’d waited another week I could be in on all this, but what can I say, I live in a different time/world…

  • @suvann540i
    @suvann540i 11 місяців тому

    want legit critic vs public ratings now. metacritic is your best shot now. 5.3/10 public score currently

  • @X45018
    @X45018 11 місяців тому

    The audience verified score on rotten tomatoes means they bought tickets not verified from Twitter. Why is this guy just making stuff up ? 😅

  • @Abhishek-1985
    @Abhishek-1985 11 місяців тому

    I agree with Andrew on Oppenheimer. Did not understand a thing !

  • @markbeats9699
    @markbeats9699 11 місяців тому +1

    Would a fucking spoiler warning hurt?

  • @alexandercooley5982
    @alexandercooley5982 11 місяців тому +5

    I liked op ngl

  • @AbhaySingh-ty8vd
    @AbhaySingh-ty8vd 11 місяців тому

    Oppenheimer was a great movie , not every nolan movie is a batman movie....

  • @SpaNkeee
    @SpaNkeee 10 місяців тому

    so barbies used the lover girl method?

  • @sharpaycutie2
    @sharpaycutie2 8 місяців тому

    I never understood how whoever decision it was to drop a bomb on CIVILAONS?!? Didn’t end up in jail?!? Them…the pilot ect

  • @Berdymadafakas
    @Berdymadafakas 11 місяців тому

    I stole barbie and paid for openheimer

  • @westcoastkidd17
    @westcoastkidd17 11 місяців тому

    Technically speaking, Oppenheimer was brilliant, but it fell short in the storytelling and the emotional aspects of a true masterpiece. I think Nolan could've focused less on the pace and theatrics of it and explored more of Oppenheimer's inner conflict of developing the bomb and the emotional struggle from the accusations of him being a communist. He was clearly the protagonist and rightfully so, but Nolan overall fell short of having the audience fully root for Oppenheimer and pity him for wrongfully being a target of the US, despite being a loyal patriot.

  • @lovetownsend
    @lovetownsend 11 місяців тому

    Only 3 things I didn't like about Oppenheimer: The nuke scene was silent at explosion, like an anti-climax. Also didn't show the 2 bombs on Japan. And last hour of movie was commie bullshit.

  • @MineCraftRetarded
    @MineCraftRetarded 11 місяців тому +1

    5 straight dudes talking about the barbie movie and shitting on it even tho only 1 of em seen it is wild

  • @natethegreat7821
    @natethegreat7821 11 місяців тому

    Jidion is based af

  • @martthesling
    @martthesling 11 місяців тому

    "Hearing this, His Majesty stated that the advent of the new weapon like the atomic bomb made it impossible to continue the persecution of war and steps should be taken to end the war without delay." August 8th, 1945 Gaimusho (Ministry of Foreign Affairs) ed. Shusen Shiroku (The Historical Records of the End of the War), annotated by Jun Eto, volume 4, 57-60 [Excerpts] [Translation by Toshihiro Higuchi]

  • @Gabe-cv4yr
    @Gabe-cv4yr 11 місяців тому +3

    the entire movie(barbie) was satire, lol...dont take it too seriously, its hilarious.

    • @jr5993
      @jr5993 11 місяців тому +1

      Andrew ain't too smart.

  • @Itubersays
    @Itubersays 11 місяців тому +1

    jeeez did andrew even watch the movie, what is he talking about ?!? Clearly his ADHD brain was in the barbie land, you gotta watch Oppenheimer again my dude, you really missed the plot if that is your takeaway.

  • @ShahYT.Official
    @ShahYT.Official 11 місяців тому +13

    Hear the review for both movie from The Critical Drinker 👌

    • @user-kb1hw2yq2f
      @user-kb1hw2yq2f 11 місяців тому +4

      Hate him or not, watch Ben Shapiros 45 min breakdown of the movie. He breaks down the movie very very well imo.

    • @anoopjprakash
      @anoopjprakash 11 місяців тому +9

      @@user-kb1hw2yq2f lmfao 40 year old man whines about the barbie movie for 45 minutes 💀

    • @cameron9359
      @cameron9359 11 місяців тому +2

      @@anoopjprakashif he liked it would you laugh and say a 40yr old man praises it 45 min?? No, you would be telling everyone how much he likes it and supporting his review. Barbie did a amazing job hiding what the story was in the promotions to get ppl to see it when opened.. but regardless of what you think it’s a very woke movie..

    • @ibot2157
      @ibot2157 11 місяців тому

      ​​@@anoopjprakash You people only say that when they don't like a movie that you like.
      Wake up fool, movies are tools of propaganda.